Oakland Raiders @ Denver Broncos Wednesday Injury Report

by John Bena on Nov 19, 2008 5:33 PM MST in 2008 Game Previews Comment 20 comments

Denver Broncos
Player	Injury	Wed. Participation	Thur. Participation	Fri. Participation	Friday Status
S Marlon McCree	Ankle	Out
LB Nate Webster	Knee	Out
LB D.J. Williams	Knee	Out
RB Selvin Young	Groin	Did Not Participate
CB Champ Bailey	Groin	Limited Participation
DT DeWayne Robertson	Knees	Full Participation
TE Tony Scheffler	Groin	Full Participation
RB Peyton Hillis	Shoulder	Full Participation
RB P.J. Pope	Ribs	Full Participation
DT Josh Shaw	Toe/Finger	Full Participation
Oakland Raiders
Player	Injury	Wed. Participation	Thur. Participation	Fri. Participation	Friday Status
LB Ricky Brown	Groin	Did Not Participate
C Jake Grove	Calf	Did Not Participate
WR Javon Walker	Ankle	Did Not Participate
QB JaMarcus Russell	Knee/Ankle	Limited Participation
WR Chaz Schilens	Ankle	Limited Participation
DE Derrick Burgess	Triceps	Full Participation
RB Darren McFadden	Toe	Full Participation
QB Andrew Walter	Ankle	Full Participation

0 recs | Comment 20 comments | Share

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Does that mean we will face Walter and not Russell?

by isiddiqi on Nov 19, 2008 5:44 PM MST reply actions 0 recs

I know it was a question...

all last week as well…

-TSG

SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport

Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com

by John Bena on Nov 19, 2008 5:45 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

I'm betting that

they play that one as close to the vest as possible.

The Broncos will prepare for both and expect Russell, because in the final analysis, Davis wants to see Russell play, not walters.

Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 19, 2008 5:46 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

What is the difference between DNP and out

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum

by Broncoman on Nov 19, 2008 5:46 PM MST reply actions 0 recs

It must have soemthing to do with

severity. The guys who are listed as OUT are also the ones who have no expectation of going right now. The DNP seems to be a player who probably isn’t doing the rehab that that the OUTs are doing, but isn’t on the practice field either…

I too am curious about what the ‘official’ difference is, if anyone knows…

Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 19, 2008 5:48 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

Answer

Out – Will not play. Too disabled to be fielded.

DNP – Did Not Practice (somewhere between “out” and "questionable"). While the player didn’t practice, he may have received some theraputic training/treatment from the staff. He did not take part in game related, physical activities.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Nov 19, 2008 5:51 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

Then how come Javon Walker is listed as DNP?

I thought we was out for the year.

"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan

Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 6

by weazel on Nov 19, 2008 5:52 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

+1

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum

by Broncoman on Nov 19, 2008 5:53 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

If he is on IR...

…then he has gone beyond “out”, which is a game by game rating. IR is a point of no return for the season.

If he is likely “out” for this game, as well as the rest of the season, Oakland may list him as “out” or even “DNP” if there is even a tiny chance they would want him back. There may be some contractual issues involved, and Oakland is likely listing Walker in a manner that best protects their financial interests.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Nov 19, 2008 5:58 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

Good point, I know there was some contractual thing about injury settlement

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum

by Broncoman on Nov 19, 2008 6:06 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

Walker has not been officially been placed on IR

-TSG

SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport

Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com

by John Bena on Nov 19, 2008 6:10 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

Well, then I guess Oakland looking at him from week to week.

"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan

Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 6

by weazel on Nov 19, 2008 6:17 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

Last year they decided to change the O/D/Q/P

into “Out/DNP/LP/FP” for Wed, Thurs, Friday. These stand for limited and full participation, as well as what HT already explained. Then, the team must also release O/D/Q/P on Friday. They haven’t “officially” ruled out Walker but it is a pretty transparent move. If they are on IR/Suspended or are not injured, they don’t need to be listed at all.

Jason
The Hanging Curve

by poorboywilly on Nov 19, 2008 6:19 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

Isn't Walker out for the year?

Well, I see Champ did practice a little bit, however we will find out Friday. Although I don’t want the Broncos rushing him back quickly. I am sure we will be fine Sunday without him. Let him be 100% for the Jets.

Russell did play against Miami despite having tendinitis (think that’s what it is) in his knee. As far as Walter, don’t really know anything about him. Hopefully we can create some havoc on either one like we did in week 1.

"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan

Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 6

by weazel on Nov 19, 2008 5:47 PM MST reply actions 0 recs

I advocate holding Bailey out this week.

Oakland has the worst pass offense in the League after ten games. No need to rush Bailey back.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Nov 19, 2008 5:53 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

I agree

No need to rush him back and make the injuryy worse, save him for the stretch run, I expect Oakland will try to run the ball early and often.

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum

by Broncoman on Nov 19, 2008 5:54 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

I agree.

Get him back for Brett Favre. Favre has shown a tendency to force it this year, and I would love to see what happens if he tries to force it to Champ Bailey.

His Highness, The Duke of Juke, Fast Easy Eddie Casino Crown Royale With Cheese!

by papigrande on Nov 19, 2008 5:55 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

Is it just me, or does it look like our guys are recovering, sucking it up, or what ever, better than the fader guys?

It must help to be playing for the BRONCOS, vs. the faders. I think that if i was a fader player, with a little bit of hurt going on, I wouldn’t want to “suck it up” to play for that team either!

GO DENVER!

A tuff bunch!

by metalman5050 on Nov 19, 2008 6:20 PM MST reply actions 0 recs

I think we will see more of Tatum than any of us expected when we started this season

The nice thing is—he seemed to be really hugging the ball when he carried last week.. maybe he’s the catch of this year—who knows anymore.

The best defense is a good defense!
And last week's young players. Yes!

by Mike Clark on Nov 19, 2008 6:42 PM MST reply actions 0 recs

I think you may be right!

He has been givven a second chance and he KNOWS it. He knows why he was traded. He fumbled the ball at some very inopportune times, and he Knows it! I think that he has learned the lesson that was needed to get back in there and to be the back that he always could have been. Just hold onto the ball, baby!

by metalman5050 on Nov 20, 2008 5:01 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs