Broncos place Nate Jackson on I/R, re-sign Chad Mustard
Nate Jackson is headed for Injured Reserve.......again.
The Denver Broncos on Thursday signed free-agent tight end Chad Mustard to take Jackson's place.
Jackson was placed on the reserve/injured list with a right hamstring injury suffered in practice on Wednesday. Jackson, a sixth-year player, appeared in all 10 games (3 starts) for the Broncos this season and caught 11 passes for 84 yards (7.6 avg.) with one touchdown while posting four tackles on special teams.
Mustard (6-foot-6, 277 pounds) is in his fifth NFL season and third year with the Broncos, who waived him on Nov. 4. He saw time in three games (vs. Jac. 10/12, at N.E. 10/20 and vs. Mia. 11/2) for Denver this season after signing with the club on Oct. 6, and he also competed in its 2008 training camp.
In 44 career games (6 starts) with Denver (2006-08) and Cleveland (2002-04), Mustard has totaled 12 receptions for 123 yards (10.3 avg.). He entered the NFL with the Browns as a practice-squad signee in 2002 following a stint with the Omaha Beef of the National Indoor Football League.
Mustard played two seasons of football at the University of North Dakota after competing on its basketball team for two years. He finished his collegiate basketball career ranked eighth all-time in UND annals with 1,568 points scored.
Born on Oct. 8, 1977, Mustard attended Scotus Central Catholic High School in Columbus, Neb.
Comments
CRAP!!
Nate was running around like an excited junior high kid in the Atlanta game. What happened??
Well, let’s hope Scheffler is back to full speed and can stay healthy. This has become ridiculous . . .
Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy
by AZDynamics on
Nov 20, 2008 10:53 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
We like the Mustard.
Nate Jackson……………………..
If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
by Zappa on
Nov 20, 2008 11:13 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah...
…I hope Sheffler stays healthy now…and Graham will be more involved in the offense too I think.
There is only One Moment—this moment—the Eternal Moment of Now
by sirsam on
Nov 20, 2008 11:26 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Not too worried
I like Mustard, be may not be the recieving threat Jackson was, but he is good in the trenches, will allow Graham to get more involved in the passing game.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
by Broncoman on
Nov 20, 2008 11:35 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
That's a shame...
Jackson has emerged and made some very big catches this season. I doubt he will ever become a starter-quality TE, but he has played a significant role on this team. The 4th quarter catch in Cleveland stands out in my mind.
by nycbroncosfan on
Nov 20, 2008 11:39 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
crimany
I’ve been reluctant to raise the point (I’ve been thinking about it though) but we’re probably going to look at TE is the upcoming draft. We can live with what we’ve got — certainly — but constant injury concerns, as well as Graham’s age, make it desirable to find someone who can provide us with a consistent performer. It’s not a performance issue but a reliability issue.
by Colinski on
Nov 20, 2008 12:01 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't worry about Graham's age...
… He just turned 30 four days ago and he’s in excellent shape. I’d give him at least 2 to 3 more years before we even need to start thinking about a replacement.
Plus, Sirsam and Broncoman are right. Graham will become more of a threat in the passing game as our O-line gains more and more confidence. I’m rather excited about that prospect. =)
by Davus.X on
Nov 20, 2008 2:26 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We should start looking at a blocking TE in roughly the late 3rd round
What is the durability factor for the Broncos TEs? Graham is in his 7th season, Jackson his 6th, Mustard his 5th and even though Schef is only in his 3rd he has struggled with injuries.
I agree that Graham is in good health now, but we need to plan for 2-3 years from now. A blocking TE will probably need a couple of years of practice/development before they can be trusted to protect franchise QBs. During those 2-3 years, the new guy can fight for a roster spot and playing time with Jackson and Mustard.
Really a shame that Jackson won’t be able to finish the season. This season’s offense augments his skill set (receiving) more so than the previous run heavy schemes of the past.
The future looks so bright that we're going to need blue and orange sunglasses!
by Arctic Bronco on
Nov 20, 2008 9:22 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
that's right
Comments by me about seeking help at a position shouldn’t be misinterpreted; I’m not seeking to end anyone’s career prematurely, and I am identifying areas that we can add help — if it’s available at a certain point in the draft. The point is to evaluate positions that would be aided by an incoming draft pick. And there aren’t many (a minority of them) that wouldn’t, so it’s a sorting out process to compare needs across positions. In this case, TE has suffered from injury problems that rob us of a consistent pass catching threat. Ideally, we’d like to have a pass catching TE who’s ‘consistently’ in the game, and this would be particularly true if were in the playoffs.
I probably should start yet another draft topic, but a few people took offense at the idea of thinking of the draft while the season was ongoing. Some of us, on the other hand, never stop thinking of way of helping the team, and part of that process involves identifying team weaknesses along with monitoring players who might help us in that area.
Re: durability factor. Graham isn’t the problem, but he’s no longer the pass catching threat he was in college. Quite obviously, Jackson and Scheffler are injury prone. I think TE who can remain healthy would be a nice addition. It would seem to make sense to have one who’s can perform both the blocking and pass catching. BTW — I see that Wisconsin’s TE, Travis Beckum has had injury problems that might affect his draft status. We’d be adding yet another — perhaps — injury prone TE but his skill set reminds me of Shannon Sharpe. We’ve had 4 TEs in the past and it might be one more way of addressing the problem. We could use one more good pass catcher, and this crop of WRs might not give us one, so TE could be a another way of adding one more receiver.
BTW — I’m expecting about a 3/2 defense/offense split in the draft. We’ll probably be hoping to fill the S/MLB/DT positions in the early rounds but the criterion later on will be whether the player can contribute, and the ability to fill certain niches provides a way for players to help the team. A power runner (durable one) like Shonn Greene, Iowa, or a Rashad Jennings, Liberty, would help the running game. A deep threat would clearly help, see various here. And there are other ways to go, too. The point here is that the middle and late rounds contain a lot of potential niche players who could provide important contributions.
by Colinski on
Nov 21, 2008 2:00 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The fanposts are yours
just as much as anyone else’s. So far all the different draft discussions have goten plenty of comments, which means there are some people who value them. If I were you I would continue to post and contribute, since you seem to have a ton of info.
I personally don’t want to get drawn into a draft conversation, so I am exhibiting self control in not jumping in, but I certainly think that with as much information as needs to be processed for a comprehensive understanding of the ebb and flow of each years draft, it is never to early for fans to be getting a mentla image and checklist of options, potential and “lookout” scenarios.
I would only say that your post should have a focused theme, other than that, anything is fair game in the fan posts.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by styg50 on
Nov 21, 2008 2:44 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not a good sign
“Mustard (6-foot-6, 277 pounds) is in his fifth NFL season and third year with the Broncos, who waived him on Nov. 4. He saw time in three games (vs. Jac. 10/12, at N.E. 10/20 and vs. Mia. 11/2) for Denver this season after signing with the club on Oct. 6, and he also competed in its 2008 training camp.”
Whenever he plays we lose? I hope he left the jinx factor out of Broncos facility…
by isiddiqi on
Nov 20, 2008 12:11 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Not so fast.
Mustard (like Jackson) is frequently let go, brought back, let go, and brought back by the team during a season. He plays on the fringe of the depth chart. He can’t catch as well as Scheff, and can’t block as well as Graham, but he’s a solid back-up in my opinion. For a team that isn’t afraid of two TE sets, he provides excellent depth. He could be a #2 TE on several teams.
I look at him as a mirror of Jackson, but Mustard is more of a blocker, while Jackson is more of a receiver.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Nov 20, 2008 5:02 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So if we lose to Oakland, he gets cut? :)
That is a pretty weird coincidence though.
by MattR on
Nov 20, 2008 8:41 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This sucks
because he was finally making some plays for us. I hope his injury isn’t serious enough so that he is healthy next year. Lately everybody has been stepping it up so I would love to see Chad Mustard do that same.
"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan
Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 6
by weazel on
Nov 20, 2008 12:13 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
hmmmm we're getting a little thin it seems
Oh well, Mustard is a good blocker
The best defense is a good defense!
And last week's young players. Yes!
by Mike Clark on
Nov 20, 2008 2:03 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
good
line up mustard, graham, larsen, and hillis, and pound the damn ball down the field
hear me, perpetrators of bread crime, your punishment is at hand.
taste my blintzkrieg!
by davecheffy on
Nov 20, 2008 8:47 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs






























