MHR Chalk Talk -- Week 10 - Denver at Cleveland
YOUR SOURCE FOR THE VERY BEST
IN DENVER BRONCO PRE-GAME ANALYSIS
MILEHIGHREPORT.COM 

Check Out DawgsByNature for all things Cleveland Browns!
Shake it off Denver fans! Denver lost to two good teams (NE and JAX) and has lost two games to underdogs (MIA and KC). Still, they have beaten good teams like TB and NO, while beating divsion rivals SD and OAK.
Already, members of the Blue and Orange Faithful are floating ideas of dropping the head coach, giving up on the season, or fighting with outher fans over trivial matters. We don't expect teams to fall apart when the going gets tough, and I expect fans to buck up too!
Where are we? 4-4. With that ugly record we still find ourselves where it matters - at the head of the division. All that matters is getting to the post season. The slate gets wiped clean, and every team there is in a single elimination tournament for glory. Do I think we have a shot at SB glory? No, of course not. That's not the point though. This team is rebuilding (like it or not), and a playoff shot would be valuable experience for a young team learning to play together as a team.
This game against the Brown presents th team with many interesting issues. Let's explore them together, and see why this game is worth watching...

Which team will show up Thursday? Will it be the team that had Royal making a 95 yard return, featured Hillis making multiple catches and yards as a secret FB weapon, and displayed a deep pass for a (onverruled) TD, or will it be the team that continues to turnover the ball, gained under 15 yards in rushing, and blew a game that most fans would have expected to be a win?
Here is what you should be watching and considering going into the game.
Denver's RB situation could go either way
Pittman and Hall are both on injured reserve for the season. Pittman has been steady as a power RB, and Hall (despite a couple of terrible fumbles) provided depth and a weapon for returns.
Now the team must rely on Torain and Young. Young is injury prone, and hasn't played much for Denver lately, so much of the job is up to Torain.
Some fans may worry about Torain's abilities. He carried the ball three times and got only one yard against MIA in his first game since college. He has also spent the last several weeks recovering from an elbow injury. I'm not worried.
First, against conventional wisdom, I wouldn't be surprised if Hillis gets some carries as a halfback. He can catch out of the backfield on screens, but he can also run downfield for catches. Shanahan made a comment that he still needs to work on blocking, but this may indicate that Hillis is more ready to run the ball and catch it than to block. Also, Hillis got a taste of experience, but not enough to showcase what talent he has. If you've been waiting for the train to arrive, this is the game to watch. MIA's game was just an easing in period.
B. Williamson sneaks in a decent article at ESPN (no, really) about the limited, but not all bad possibilities in the free agent market if Torain doesn't work out:
Another reason Torain is being asked to produce is because there aren't many running backs remaining on the open market. So help isn't necessarily on the way. Former Denver running backs highlight the list of available rushers. They include Tatum Bell, Mike Bell and Ron Dayne. Other running backs available are Anthony Thomas, Vernand Morency and Wali Lundy. Denver has visited with some of those players in the past. Morency visited Denver a few weeks ago. The team also could promote running back P.J. Pope from the practice squad.
The Browns should have issues in passing and catching
The Browns did something incredibly foolish in my opinion. They switched QBs in a short week. A QB switch is a move to be made during a bye week, or a long week (such as after a Thu game). But in a short week?
WR Jurevicius is out for the season with a staph infection to the knee. How is the rest of the pass offense doing?
From the Akron Beacon Journal:
Quarterback Derek Anderson made an outstanding play to avoid the rush and to find Edwards deep down the middle. Edwards dropped it...
Late in the game, fans were chanting for Brady Quinn, as if Anderson didn't throw a perfect pass that easily could have led to a game-changing play. The chant was predictable, and it now appears the Browns are going to give Quinn a chance Thursday...
Anderson's main receiver has a league-high 13 dropped passes. Coach Romeo Crennel basically said Monday that if he had another receiver worth squadoosh, he would play him instead of Edwards.
He doesn't — unless someone is seeing something in Syndric Steptoe and Steve Sanders that I'm not. Anderson's second receiver? Donte' Stallworth was on the inactive list.
Kellen Winslow had five catches but also ranted and gesticulated after every little block (a tight end is supposed to block, right?)
The offensive line had a tough time with the Ravens' defense, especially when guard Eric Steinbach left with a rib injury.
I spent a year in Akron where I experienced Browns fans firsthand. Some things I liked (a passion for the team). But one thing I couldn't stand was there desire to throw QBs overboard. In the year I was in Ohio, Cleveland's offensive line couldn't protect their QB at all, but the locals blamed the QB for everything that went wrong. They were yelling for a change then, and doing it now. I expect Quinn will get the same, sorry treatment.
Somehow, someway, Denver's defense is improving
You can watch a game for purely the wins and losses. If you want to be analytical, you also need to watch for the good and the bad, as well as trends. Something to like is the recent improvements on defense.
Sure, Denver's defense has been trying to defend a short field do to interceptions and fumbles. But in terms of pure yards given up, the defense has been terrible. They overpursue, don't tackle, and don't get pressure on opposing QBs. But the last couple of games have shown improvements.
The RMN makes this observation:
Expectations weren't high for the Broncos defense, with All-Pro cornerback Champ Bailey out because of an injury, but until Miami's final eight-minute-plus scoring drive Sunday, Denver's defense kept the Broncos in the game, while the offense kept giving it away.
Miami scored 13 points off Denver turnovers, all generated by quarterback Jay Cutler's interceptions.
Cutler threw interceptions on two of the Broncos' first three drives, helping put the Broncos in a 13-0 hole 10 minutes into the game...
But the Broncos defense, which fast was becoming a leaguewide joke, curtailed the damage, holding the Dolphins to 75 rushing yards and 4-of-14 third-down conversions, giving Denver a fighting chance until the final quarter.
Denver has a new star
Hillis went over 100 yards recieving for a RB (fullback or halfback), something done by Floyd Little twice and Bobby Anderson once in Denver's history. Wow!
Hillis led all Broncos receivers in the game against MIA, and showed me (as I pointed out earlier) that we are fine at RB if injuries are lack of production continue.
The bottom line
Ok, Denver has lost four of the last five games after a very enjoyable start to the season. Even after the bye week, Denver remains banged up and bloodied. Why should Denver win this away game?
- I'll take a short week of preparation by Shanahan over the same time period for Crennel.
- While Denver seems to be teetering on the edge, the Browns are in an all out collapse.
- Promoting your number two QB in a 3 day prep week? No Way!
- Cutler is in a funk with INTs. It's a part of development. He'll recover. Quinn doesn't even have Cutler's experience yet, and he certainly doesn't have Cutler's O-Line or recievers (I'll credit CLE for Winslow at TE)
- Denver's defense is starting to gell. The Browns defense showed a total implosion against the Ravens.
This is a key game for Denver for several reasons. They either move forward with a winning record, or a losing record. They'll also get another bye (in effect) by being able to rest until the following week. This is also a game that Denver should win, so a loss would be devestating, but a win will help the team refocus and look ahead.
I consider this game the gut check. The guys have a great opportunity to make their stand Thur night in front of a national audience an audience of the few people with the NFL Network. It's a chance to pocket a win, and go into a semi-bye week with a good attitude, and a lot of time to prepare and heal up for the rest of the season. This could be a turning point for a young team, but it's up to them which way it will turn.
Comments
I agree
Great Post!
I especially agree about the defense. For so many weeks were were talking about our defense playing horribly and not having an identity etc. Now the focus has shifted to the ineptitude of the offense protecting the ball but something happened in the background that has gone un-noticed.
The defense played well! I still didn’t see an identity on the defense but who knows; maybe that is the identity. Shanny called for a more unpredictible defense and if even the players don’t know what they are doing, that’s pretty dang unpredictible.
I still saw a mix of 3-4, 4-3, and show blitz with 8 in the box but there was something that I was so used to seeing and I didn’t see against MIA. The defense was in position on all but one play. That one play was the 30 yard run by Ronnie Brown and I’m sure as he lined up in the back field he was licking his chops. If you go back and watch replay of that run, you’ll see a DT lined up in the 1 gap, and a DE playing outside the the tackle. I was screaming at the TV hoping Webster would hear me to tell the DE or DT to shift but alas – the FB and G got through to block LB’s and you had a long run.
Other than that, the Broncos played great run defense. They completely shut down the Wildcat, players maintained their gap discipline and did not over pursuit and we held the running game in check.
You summerized everything that I felt about the defense:
Denver’s defense is starting to gell.
There is no 'Ctrl' button on Chuck Norris's computer. Chuck Norris is always in control.
Chuck Norris destoryed the periodic table because he only recognizes the element of surprise.
by nickt84 on
Nov 5, 2008 6:56 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Great comment nick
Your analysis complement the post well. You are up there in a league with the editors!
That’s ok with me. We’re playing for wins, not media publicity....HT 9/11/08
by firstfan on
Nov 5, 2008 10:18 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
First off, Congrats to Barack Obama...even though I had voted Third Party. ;-)
I had the Browns beating us this Thursday. Then Crennel switched quarterbacks and guaranteed victory. Oh hell no! Shanny is gonna have our team come out and bust some dudes in the mouth. Broncos 37, Browns 27(a generous 27 if I might add).
If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
by Zappa on
Nov 5, 2008 7:49 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes!! Come on guys...let's turn this DAMN thing around!
There is only One Moment—this moment—the Eternal Moment of Now
by sirsam on
Nov 5, 2008 9:46 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good for you
I also voted for Barr. 1% of the popular vote man!
There is no 'Ctrl' button on Chuck Norris's computer. Chuck Norris is always in control.
Chuck Norris destoryed the periodic table because he only recognizes the element of surprise.
by nickt84 on
Nov 5, 2008 10:14 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I had to write in Chuck Baldwin. California doesn't like the Constitution (Party). lol
Solid comment above as well dude.
If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
by Zappa on
Nov 5, 2008 10:34 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Uhm,
Ahem! (Clearing throat).
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Nov 5, 2008 11:38 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was not intending to discuss any politics. Only to congratulate Obama on his victory.
I ask that no one else post any political crap on this thread. We got a GAME tomorrow!!!!!! Besides, I think we are ALL about finished with politics for at least 2 years. lmao
If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
by Zappa on
Nov 5, 2008 11:45 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thank God
to everything you said above!
"It's all over Fat Man" - Tom Jackson to John Madden 1977 AFC Championship Game
"I love your analysis of our team. Its kinda like watching a spider monkey trying to figure out a jar of peanuts.. you know whats going on.. you know whats in there, but to actually figure it out, is just a bit beyond your mental skills..."
- Bronco Dano
by DesertBroncoFan on
Nov 5, 2008 12:20 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Here here!
No congrats, no “who I voted for”, no nothin’ (except why I love the Broncos and why the Browns should lose).
lol
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Nov 5, 2008 1:02 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Title is wrong, says "Miami"
But other than that. Agree 100%. I thought the defense played admirably last Sunday.
by DeadDrunk on
Nov 5, 2008 8:55 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Great Post HT
The best defense is a good offense!
I hope.
by Mike Clark on
Nov 5, 2008 9:56 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
hillis
completely agree, and mentioned before, he should be getting some carries, especially now with pittman out. we need some sort of power running game to take the heat off the pass offense. the defense appears to have abandoned the 3-man rush, or perhaps it is the fact we are trailing all the time now. either way, it is reason to celebrate, and improvement came immediately. the players don’t like it, and it was surely killing us. someone woke up, thank god. st’s are definitely improving, and now, even with the injuries to the defense, it is the offense that needs to stop beating us. OUR offense.
well, here we are at 4-4, with a 1 game lead in the division race. the only race, as there will not be a wild-card team from the afc west, obviously. shanny has guaranteed the playoffs, and that is still within reach. this is the softer part of our schedule, even though we are banged up, making mistakes, and on the road for the most part. so what. we have many winnable games in the second half, and hopefully we get some players back for the home stretch, which will be huge heading into the playoffs. playoffs? playoffs? yes, i still believe we can take this sorry division, and turn things around. we have half of a season to do it, and we still control our own fate. this browns game is pretty much as close to a must-win as you can get at this point in the season, not only for the standings, but for the mental health of our young, struggling players. to me, it is as simple as this: IF we can turn the ball over 2 times or less, or have less than a -2 in the turnover department, we win the game. we have still been in games at that point, but the 3rd one is too much to overcome. also, anything close to 10 penalties cannot happen again. but we even overcame back-back penalties to throw a long td pass, but you all know what happened there. if we don’t attack on defense in this game, with quinn’s first nfl start, then we never will. i’m afraid we won’t, and we’ll keep him in a comfort zone all game long. but with the injuries we now have on defense, i don’t see another option but to try and force the issue. we simply don’t have the time to let our backups get beat repeatedly by their starters. it is time to see what kind of intestinal fortitude this team has, and if they come to play, we have a good chance of a one-and-done playoff appearance. i believe that is a reasonable goal, and a good experience for a team that has been through what they’ve been through. if we are a penalty-driven, sulking, turnover machine again, you can kiss this season goodbye. i’m hoping for the former, so let’s bring it, already
hear me, perpetrators of bread crime, your punishment is at hand.
taste my blintzkrieg!
by davecheffy on
Nov 5, 2008 10:37 AM MST
reply
actions
1 recs
I'm not sure I agree with our upcoming schedule being soft
Before the season started, I would have said that it was the softer half of our schedule (other than 5 of the games are on the road). But, after Cleveland, we’re at Atlanta (which has become the surprise of this season, I believe) where they are very tough. We also face the Bretts in New Jersey (whether we get the good Brett or bad Brett, no one knows), Carolina in Charlotte (they are playing tough this year) and finally in San Diego (where they will be looking for revenge for the Hochuli fiasco).
Our only home games are against the faders, chefs and Bills. The faders and chefs should be pushovers (but there is a reason they play the games) and Buffalo could be tricky, though they have slipped lately, it could still be a tough game.
"It's all over Fat Man" - Tom Jackson to John Madden 1977 AFC Championship Game
"I love your analysis of our team. Its kinda like watching a spider monkey trying to figure out a jar of peanuts.. you know whats going on.. you know whats in there, but to actually figure it out, is just a bit beyond your mental skills..."
- Bronco Dano
by DesertBroncoFan on
Nov 5, 2008 11:34 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i'll take that
over new england, jacksonville, new orleans, and tampa bay. raiders and chiefs at home, as opposed to the road, and the bills are fading. atlanta and the jets are beatable, although we could get “favred” again, as you pointed out. the only games i see as definite losses are the panthers and chargers on the road. we should be in every other game if we can stop beating ourselves(debatable). tougher schedule than it appeared at the beginning of the season, but we have an opportunity to get 6 out of 8, maybe 5. hopefully, that’s enough to take the division, and we do get back champ, dj, and mccree for the stretch run. young and scheff are almost back, too, so we just have to hang in there and things should improve
hear me, perpetrators of bread crime, your punishment is at hand.
taste my blintzkrieg!
by davecheffy on
Nov 5, 2008 12:05 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Cleveland's Front Seven
One aspect of the game I have grown to enjoy is watching our young O-Line compete each week against the opposing defensive front seven. Many thanks to you HT for the MHR University articles and the weekly Chalk-Talks for explaining so much. On to this week’s look at Cleveland.
It looks to me like Cleveland’s front seven is exactly where the Broncos want to be in two or three years. They run a 3-4 anchored by Sean Rogers. The Detroit game last year still makes me want to throw a brick at the TV. We gave a hard look at Mr. Rogers (who never has a wonderful day in the neighborhood) but he landed with Cleveland. He is 6’4" 350 lbs. and quick. He is in his eighth year and in the middle of his prime. He plays the two gap 0 technique as well as anyone in pro football. If he could only maintain a high intesity level each week he would be a force for all teams to fear. Fortunatey for Denver, he does not seem to be able to bring that intensity week in and week out and he had a monster game last Sunday. He is sporting some tender ribs this week and did not practice yesterday. He is flanked on the right by Shawn Smith who is 6’2" and 325. Smith is in his fifth year and also very quick and experienced. If Mr. Rogers cannot go due to the ribs Smith will slide over to NT with very litle drop off in performance. The third NT on this very deep front seven is Ahtyba Rubin who many on the MHR coveted as a high value player in last spring’s draft. Rubin is 6’2" and 330. If Smith does indeed move over to NT he would likely be replaced by # 97 Thomas who is a pass-rushing specialist at 6’4" and 305 and the smallest man on the entire front three. At left Defensive End Cleveland starts Cory Williams who is 6’4", 320 lbs. and is in his fifth year and came to Cleveland via Green Bay. In summary, Cleveland has a strong, fast, large Defensive front three with outstanding depth all across the line.
Cleveland’s Linebacking core is equally impressive. On the outside they have Willie McGinnist and Kamerion Wembly. Even though he is a little long in the tooth (15 years in the league from NE) at 6’5" and 270 lbs. McGinnist is a monster LB. Even though he has slowed a bit, he is still cat-quick and very effective against the run. Wimbley is 6’3" and 255 and in his third year. They are both backed up by rookie Alex Hall who is 6’5" and 255 lbs. Do you see a pattern here? Big, fast, tough Linebackers are the strength of the Cleveland front seven. On the inside they have D’Qwell Jackson, a third year player, at 6’4’ and 240 and Andra Davis at 6’0" and 250 who is a seven year veteran.
I am not smart enough to tell for sure, but I think they run a Phillips 3-4. This seems like the fourth time in the last five games we have faced a 3-4. Even though opponents have not had success in getting to Cutler, the bump and run in blitz packages seems to contribute somehow to Jay’s tendancy to lock on to a reciever and I would bet my old sweaty socks we see more of the same this Thursday.
Things to look for this week will be how our zone block does against #92 Sean Rogers and #55 Willie McGinnist. Even though this is a pretty physically impressive front seven, if we can really learn from our mistkes against NE and MIA I think we can give these guys a game. GO BRONCOS!!!
That’s ok with me. We’re playing for wins, not media publicity....HT 9/11/08
by firstfan on
Nov 5, 2008 12:09 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Great stuff First.
I’m not sure about whether CLE runs a Phillips or a Fairbanks. I tend to think it might be a Fairbanks, but didn’t put it in my wrote up because frankly, I just don’t know.
Crennel came from NE, so that’s an argument for the Fairbanks, and the size of their front 3 tends to make me think it is a Fairbanks-Bullough too. I haven’t seen much of the Browns, so I can’t be sure.
While McGinneist and Andra Davis are favorites of mine, it seems that our Dawgs by Nature guest thinks the LBs haven’t been up to snuff this year.
I look at CLE as a team with the talent to perform, but not getting it done. Part of the reason may be the staph infections running rampant on the team. They brought in a company that deals in clearing out staph from facilities, and this has to be taking a toll on the players (even the ones not infected).
Cleveland just strikes me as a team that has given up on the year, while we are on the edge of going either way.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Nov 5, 2008 1:13 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll bet it is a Fairbanks
We got a good dose of that before the bye. We should be prepared. I think you are dead right on as to talent. Very talented men greatly underperforming. I hope that is not part of our scheme in 2-3 years!
That’s ok with me. We’re playing for wins, not media publicity....HT 9/11/08
by firstfan on
Nov 5, 2008 5:47 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I believe the Phillips system is the one-gap, blitz happy, and the Fairbanks is the two-gap, read & react, keep the OL off of the LBs?
If so, we run the Fairbanks.
by rufio on
Nov 5, 2008 11:36 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes.
You can read more here.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Nov 6, 2008 5:49 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
“It looks to me like Cleveland’s front seven is exactly where the Broncos want to be in two or three years.”
REALLY!?!?!
Dude our LBs are BAD. And not the good kind of bad but just plain bad. On paper, they could be decent, but they are not living up to their potential. Davis is a guy who makes a lot of tackles, but is too slow to make them less than 4 yards the wrong way of the LOS. McGinest is really old. He is fairly smart and plays the run well but he can’t cover and he can’t rush the passer anymore. Jackson is solid but probably doesn’t actually weigh 240 and is undersized without a corresponding boost in speed. Wimbley should be a monster, but he only has one move. My guess is that Clady will be able to neutralize his rush with his long arms and agility. All Wimbley does is go wide around the LT and try to duck his left shoulder under the LT’s arms. He is Zoolander; he can’t go left.
Smith is pretty good but has been slowed by a broken bone in his hand(?). Williams has not lived up to his billing thus far. He has done a good job two-gapping and from what I can remember has taken up blockers well and been an ok run-stopper. I was really excited about his ability to two-gap, then choose one and make a play by shedding his block and attacking. Haven’t seen that yet.
Rogers is an absolute animal, though. He has played every game thus far this year with a high motor.
by rufio on
Nov 5, 2008 11:35 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think your front three is why your LBs even have a chance.
I agree with your thoughts. The DL is the heart of your defense. The LBs are getting old. Our DL isn’t good enough to buy our subpar LBs any time to do much, though there is some improvement recently.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Nov 6, 2008 5:51 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Potential
I had a boss once who asked about a new salesman I had hired. I replied that he had a lot of potential. The boss said “In other words he hasn’t sold shit”. It reminds me of your linebackers. They look great on paper, but they just haven’t done much. When you look at the size, speed, experience, agility and depth of this group you wonder how in the world Cleveland could be 3-5. I guess is what I meant is that in 2-3 years we have a group of men with these attributes who produce at the top of their ability.
Even though your comments are harsh, there is a ring of truth to them. Thanks for the comment.
That’s ok with me. We’re playing for wins, not media publicity....HT 9/11/08
by firstfan on
Nov 6, 2008 1:39 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
BTW
I really appreciate the well thought out comments from Dave, Desert, and nick.
That’s ok with me. We’re playing for wins, not media publicity....HT 9/11/08
by firstfan on
Nov 5, 2008 12:13 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
It's okay. I still like you. :)
If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
by Zappa on
Nov 5, 2008 12:55 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Aw shucks
I was just mentioning the fans who talk football instead of that political stuff.
That’s ok with me. We’re playing for wins, not media publicity....HT 9/11/08
by firstfan on
Nov 5, 2008 5:38 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks firstfan
I tried to get him to stop earlier!
"It's all over Fat Man" - Tom Jackson to John Madden 1977 AFC Championship Game
"I love your analysis of our team. Its kinda like watching a spider monkey trying to figure out a jar of peanuts.. you know whats going on.. you know whats in there, but to actually figure it out, is just a bit beyond your mental skills..."
- Bronco Dano
by DesertBroncoFan on
Nov 6, 2008 8:40 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ya gotta love Zappa's passion.
Sometimes I wish a few of our players had a little Zappa in them.
That’s ok with me. We’re playing for wins, not media publicity....HT 9/11/08
by firstfan on
Nov 6, 2008 1:42 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well...
..if our players look like chicks from a distance….
(LOL)
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Nov 6, 2008 2:10 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't forget...
Our special teams core has well been…pretty special this year. With Prater booming kicks and only missing 2 FGs so far…Royal running like a mad-man. So with defence the way it is and our offence stumbling a bit, which will turn around this week (I hope). Field position becomes key and the special teams guys have really become( for me at least) a unusually bright spot this season. I also want to thank Mr.Cornell for givin some fire to a flame that need it…GO BRONCOS!!!!!!
by Maj.Havok on
Nov 5, 2008 1:01 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Perhaps I haven't done well...
…in explaining the why’s. That’s a failure in my football savvy. But I’ve been saying for several games now that I’m not as worried about the defense as I was. They really are getting better with each game. I recall many of you saying as much earlier in the season, that it would take the defense time to gell, that the goal would be to put at least a middling defense on the field by the middle of the year. It sure seems like they’re getting there.
And I don’t think there’s any doubt that special teams has come a long way. They were my major concern at the begining of the year, but now they’re begining to bite back.
So that leaves the offense. I’m going to predict that this part of the team is about to turn things around. Remember at the begining of the season when everyone outside the organization (and the MHR faithful) was saying that the Broncos were thin at receiver and nobody was impressed with our tight ends? Everybody expected a big drop off from the o-line. Well, they were surprised by the level of talent and the Bronco offense blew their defenses away.
But other teams learned quickly and made adjustments, taking advantage of the very young Broncos offense. But now those players have seen some of the tricks the old pros employ. I like to think Cutler and Marshall will not be surprised the next time around. I especially think Cutler is going to sneak a peek at inside coverage from now on. I also think the offensive coaches have a few counter measures they can teach Cutler to exploit those tendencies in the future. I really believe we’ll see some real offensive improvement this week and watch it steadily grow from this point forward.
I also think it wouldn’t be a bad time for Shanahan to start complaining loudly about the officiating. Yes it’ll probably draw a fine but it might be worth it. Somebody needs to say, “Enough already! We’ve paid for our sins. How many bad calls to we need to suffer to make up for one bad call that went our way!” Not that it really is happening. I don’t know, but I bet it’ll make some of them think twice when they’re trying to decide whether to reach for the flag or not.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on
Nov 5, 2008 2:43 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
BTW, good job HT, as always.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on
Nov 5, 2008 3:39 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree, but pat yourself on the back as well. Excellent comment dude!
If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
by Zappa on
Nov 5, 2008 4:16 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Great comment Jack.
I sure hope Scheffler is full speed as I think we might see a heavy dose of two tight end sets on Thursday. Pass, block and keep that 3-4 in place for a fraction of a second longer than they want to be.
That’s ok with me. We’re playing for wins, not media publicity....HT 9/11/08
by firstfan on
Nov 5, 2008 5:45 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good stuff Jack!
To me, the only reason to ever go off on the refs is to motivate the team. Otherwise I think it is counterproductive.
But I agree on improvements with the defense and STs this year. I remain confident in the entire offense (though the sheer number of RB injuries bothers me). Two thoughts to follow yours…
1) I think the offense will improve if we can build the running game. Teams are going after our pass heavy spread offense because we are one dimensional in our play calling (in my opinion).
2) While our defense is improving, I don’t think we have the pieces to be a “good” defense with our current roster. I think we have excellent CBs, and I even think our safeties are good enough. The problem is the front seven. The DBs will all look better with pressure up front and with a safety tandem instead of a “one in the box” look. Once we build an effective young core for the defense (as we have for the offense), this team will rock.
A quick aside: I believe in Moss. Many folks wanted to throw him overboard, but this is (in effect) a rookie year for him. He is starting to produce at the right time for a “first year” player, and I think he’ll be solid.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Nov 6, 2008 6:10 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks HT, Zappa and firstfan.
It means something coming from you.
And I agree that there is usually no good reason to go off on a referee. I think what i was trying to say is that a little creative complaining could go a long way. With as many kids as I have, I’ve literally been to hundreds of games. I’ve learned you can work referees/umpires/etc. You’ve just got to be smart about it.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on
Nov 6, 2008 4:57 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I am going to have to disagree about your analysis on Cleveland QBs.
Yes, plenty of Browns fans are too impatient/unintelligent/bloodthirsty and attempt to run coaches, GMs, and QBs out of town way too soon and way too often.
But, a lot of them have a decent point.
Honestly, have the QBs we have had since the expansion really shown you anything to make you think a team could win with them? Especially early on? Couch never had a shot because of his line. By the time fans were calling for his head, he was too damaged to be good. He doesn’t count. The people in the front office then were just dumb.
Holcomb?
Dilfer?
You can make a case for Garcia. But he is only a good QB in the West Coast Offense. No one on our coaching staff knew the West Coast at the time. It was a bad fit, and he shouldn’t have been playing for us.
Before we drafted Joe Thomas, you might argue that none of those QBs had a shot and that placing the blame on them was wrong. Fair. But do you really see any of them being so talented or good that they were irreplaceable? I don’t.
Maybe DA is a good NFL QB. Only time will tell. Maybe anyone blaming him for our losses after the Giants game is wrong. But I think we are in a situation now where we HAVE to find out what we have in Brady. How do you make a decision at QB with half of the equation unknown? I also don’t know if we are totally selling out to Quinn right now, I still think there is room to go back to Anderson.
Also: You underrate our offensive line. They aren’t healthy right now, and maybe being healthy is a part of being good, but Tucker, Steinbach, and Thomas are all great linemen when they are healthy.
Also: If Broncos fans are talking about firing the coach at 4-4 that is crazy. Do you know how many seasons Browns fans would have killed to go 8-8?
by rufio on
Nov 5, 2008 11:50 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Is Thomas not healthy right now?
i certainly consider him to be at the top of his game if he is. in fact, i am comparing his stats from 2007 directly to our own Rookie LT Ryan Clady ina n attempt to prove that Clady will deserve a vote or two int eh OROTY campaign at the end of the year.
As a Thomas fan, maybe you can weigh in on how Clady compares after you see him in this game.
You may have to watch very closely, as i have a feeling we will not be hearing Clady’s name this week… :)
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by styg50 on
Nov 6, 2008 1:36 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good points Rufio.
(By the way, is “Rufio” a tip of the hat to the character in “Hook”?)
I was in the Cleveland area when Couch was being blamed for everything, as well as Holcomb. I think the offensive lines at that time ruined those two, and they would have been fine at the position with a halfway decent OL. Garcia is doing well in TB, but the fans didn’t care for him either (and you’re right; he was a system mismatch). So I stand by my assertion that Cleveland fans blamed those three, even though the fault was elsewhere.
I have zero problem with bringing in Brady. My issue is the timing. You just don’t do it in a short week if you want him to have a good shot in his first game. It looks to me like the coach let the fans influence him, which is a terrible thing for a coach to do.
Last, I don’t have a problem with the current OL in CLE. At least I don’t think I made a statement to tht effect.
I also agree that firing a coach at 4-4 is beyond foolish. The reason the subject even comes up is because Denver fans are used to seasons where they win about 9 or 10 games. The foolishness of Denver fans is that we are spoiled, and don’t realize that most teams would kill or die to have the consistently good records that we have. Most Denver fans (fortunately) roll their eyes at talk of firing Shanahan. Bowlen (owner) is too smart to ruin the franchise by taking a chance on another HC.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Nov 6, 2008 6:23 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs




























