A Few Good Questions With.....Lee Rasizer, Rocky Mountain News
It's that time again, time for our weekly chat with RMN Broncos beat-write Lee Rasizer about what he is seeing, hearing and thinking when it comes to the Denver Broncos --
MHR -- OK, be honest. How far into a "Broncos win AFC West" story were you when the Chargers decided to spoil the fun?
LR -- I hadn't written anything. But as I watched the KC-San Diego game in the press box in Carolina early in the fourth quarter, I did plan on maybe doing my story on that topic, discussing all the travails Denver had been through to get to that point. At Bank of America Stadium's press box, there's a bank of TVs behind the rows of seats where the writers work, showing about eight games simultaneously. As the Chargers started their drive inside five minutes, me and about a couple other Denver-area people stood there and watched the TD, onside kick, TD, missed field goal drama, even while the Panthers-Broncos game had begun. The stadium staff had already switched the screens near where we work to the Broncos game and I expected to just see the onside kick recovered by the Chiefs and then go sit down. Oops. Bye, Carl Peterson ... and Herm will be joining you soon."
MHR -- Mike Shanahan admitted that he did a poor job getting the team ready last week, and that allowing them to know what was happening in KC was a mistake. Do you think he is still trying to gauge the best way to motivate his team?
LR -- That's what coaches always say when a team comes out flat. I think Carolina was the better team, by far, though Denver was somewhat dispassionate. I don't believe that the Broncos players were glued to that KC game. They might have watched some of the first half in the locker room and were apprised of the score. But it wasn't like they all had cell-phones showing the Chargers while waiting to enter the game from the sidelines. Far more germane to the discussion is that Denver couldn't run, putting everything on Cutler. And their strategy defensively was flawed because no one could cover Steve Smith, and to a lesser extent, Mushin Muhammad, one on one. I don't think motivation is an issue. It shouldn't be this week especially, knowing they're at home against a team ready to pack it in and a potential one-and-done scenario the following week in San Diego they want to avoid at all costs possibly looming. Shanahan won't let his team watch the Chargers-Bucs this week. But the players will find out somehow during the game, whether from a security guard, fan or someone else. They just have to be disciplined enough to focus on the task at hand. I think they will, personally.
MHR -- Jay Cutler seems to excel when he is the underdog (every week at Vandy). When and the Broncos are supposed to win, expected to even, he has struggled. Do you sense the same thing? In that regard how big was the win against KC a couple weeks ago?
LR -- I don't think it has much to do with being the underdog. These are the pass defense ratings of Denver's last eight opponents: Kansas City 30th, New York Jets 29th, Atlanta 23rd, Cleveland 18th ; Miami 20th, Carolina 12th, New England 15th, Oakland 9th. The Broncos beat the teams in that first grouping; lost to the rest. He's struggled against solid secondaries, regardless of overall team records. And if the Chiefs game was a building block, it didn't show vs. Carolina, because he should have had at least 3-4 interceptions that were dropped. But I will say this. When Cutler is having success, the rest of the team responds to his performances. When he's frustrated and turning the ball over, they follow suit, too. That's part of the youth on the team. It's only going to continue skewing that way the rest of the season because the running game right now isn't much of a threat and their defense isn't good enough, or opportunistic enough, to overcome offensive mistakes.
MHR -- What have your impressions of the team been this week? Confident? Loose?
LR -- I think they believe this is the week they need to get it done, at home vs. a team that's lost seven of nine. And I sense they're confident that will happen. This group is always loose, even during the week after losses. It will be interesting to see how the cold-weather affects things, since if there is any team that is equipped to handle such issues, it's the Buffalo Bills.
MHR -- I won't ask you to predict the Broncos game, but who do you like in Tampa on Sunday?
LR -- You can ask me to predict the Denver game, as long as no one loses money based on my selection and blames me for it. I believe this is the week the Broncos clinch, by winning it outright. I'd feel even more confident if J.P. Losman or the NFL Europe guy they were talking about playing earlier this week were at quarterback. Trent Edwards has put some pretty good games together but has been inconsistent. I don't know why, gut feeling, I believe Denver will force a big turnover or two that swing momentum. Buffalo is among the league-leaders with 29 giveaways. Yes, I know Denver's last in takeaways. The brittle cold won't help in that regard. I see Tampa vs. San Diego as a toss-up. I like the Bucs at home with Jeff Garcia at QB even more.
MHR -- Latest on the injury front?
LR -- As I sit here writing this, there isn't much evidence to go on, but I believe Chris Kuper will play with a cast on his broken left hand and Ryan Clady will work his way through a sore ankle that kept him out of practice. Champ Bailey has to be getting close. He's been running vigorously on a treadmill. The big issue is his ability to move laterally. But he's been testing himself in practice for weeks and eventually will pull the trigger, possibly this week. They could sit Brandon Stokley. He told me he was not going to play vs. Carolina as late as Saturday and was hurting during warm-ups but gutted it out. It's a bad heel bruise that makes it difficult to cut off of and put weight on. He missed Wednesday's practice while rehabilitating.
MHR -- What is your take on the Pro Bowl selections? Was Clady the ultimate snub?
LR -- I can only go on what I see, and he's played at a Pro Bowl level for a pass-oriented offense. While I don't lock on Clady with regularity, since I have to watch the 'big picture' I have only seen him knocked off balance and tossed aside once this season. Even when he's beaten, he's quick enough to recover. I will admit that I don't study cut-ups of other NFL tackles, so it's hard for me to argue with who's been chosen, since I don't have all the facts at hand. The backup, Roos, last time I looked hadn't allowed a sack all season. That's impressive. The one that seems to be most controversial is Jason Peters of Buffalo. Fans will get a side-by-side comparison Sunday.
LR -- Happy Holidays to all the Mile High Report readers ...
MHR -- Happy holidays to you too, Lee, from all of us here at MileHighReport!
3 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
For a MSM guy
I’m kinda starting to like this Lee Rasizer. Upfront, honest answers to excellent questions by Guru. Thanks to both of you.
It all starts in the trenches HT 11/11/08
by firstfan on Dec 18, 2008 11:32 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
I am the same way.
The more I have read the question and answer posts with him, I have really liked hearing what he has to say.
Thanks Lee and Guru
"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan
Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 9
by weazel on Dec 18, 2008 11:59 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Ditto
This is my GAP, there are many like it but this one is mine. Without my GAP I am useless, without me, they will run through my GAP. I will protect my GAP and have my brothers back on his. I will not be moved from my GAP, I am a crazed dog that patrols this area and will defeat all who entire it. I own this GAP, it is mine. I bought it with blood and sweat. I will not be pushed. I will not be moved. This Sunday I will make a stand and a statement.
by Tim Lynch on Dec 18, 2008 12:53 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree.
Lee was more objective today, but in the past he showed me his true skepticism and bias against the Broncos. He never thought the Broncos had a chance against the Jets or Atlanta either.
by The Gun Young on Dec 18, 2008 6:49 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
A logical observer would have said that, indeed, the Broncos were underdogs in that game.
His, along with all other reporters in the entire world all across the globe, job is to seek truth and report it. He isn’t a fan and he isn’t going to give Shanahan a nice tug after every game.
I go to a lot of the SBNation blogs and I have to say, I’m a Broncos fan to the max, but the folks here might be more full of homers than any other board in the network. It’s really quite funny, actually, particularly during challenges.
by rosenthal on Dec 18, 2008 9:39 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree....
There are other SBNation sites that are MUCH worse….
Besides, it is a Broncos site…There are plenty of “Broncos” sites that spew the negativity….
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
by John Bena on Dec 19, 2008 11:22 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I understand
that the site is filled with Broncos fans. I am a Broncos fan and I come here because you do an excellent job of compiling links.
But that doesn’t excuse the fact that, come gameday, folks around here lose logic and reason. I’m drawing a blank on specific examples, but pretty much any time the Broncos have a call reversed in a negative manner, this place goes nuts, even if it’s the correct call.
by rosenthal on Dec 19, 2008 1:53 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I know what you are talking about
I actually watch the games with no blogging, but I don’t like hearing our crowd with the big boos when a replay shows flat out that we didn’t get an INT (for instance). I for one respect when calls don’t go our way if the refs are doing their job well.
That being said, this year (and every year) there are still a good smattering of plays that get Denver gets the shaft on. This isn’t just us though…I think the referees still have a lot of room to improve their performance (see the Pittsburgh “touchdown” last week…there was NO frickin way that was inconclusive evidence…and I abhor Dallas).
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Dec 19, 2008 3:13 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
The gameday threads are totally nuts
I think a lot of guys around here would tell you that they are two different people between the gameday thread and the rest of their lives. They are literally a place to vent, but I guarantee that there are as many “WOOOHOOOOO!!! ROYAL!!!”s as there are “Sit and spin, ref!”s. The heart comes out in the gamethreads, and goes straight on the sleeve.
I really believe everyone here does a great job of trying to be fair and objective during the course of the week, and because we get to know everyone so well, it can be fun to watch yourself and others growing and changing as you learn more about what is going on.
Sometimes the attitude in the gamethreads can be frustrating to an observer, but certainly you must understand where it comes from. Some fans get very high and very low, while other fans go to great lenghts to keep an even keel.
But we are all fans, and MHR prides itself on being a place where any type of Broncos fan can find a place to feel comfortable talking about the Broncos. As Guru says, we all want the same thing….
Concision in style, precision in thought, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Dec 19, 2008 3:14 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Heck.
I’m a fan, and I can pick against Denver if that’s my honest assesment. That doesn’t mean I’m cheering against Denver, it just means I’m not silly enough to believe that Denver will win every game.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Dec 19, 2008 12:37 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he is the best of the local beat writers, by far
There were rumors a couple weeks ago that the Rocky would cease all operations as soon as January, and at the very least, the paper is known to be for sale. I hope the implications of whatever happens are favorable for Lee, because he is so much better than these other Denver-area guys.
"I am not one of those who think that coming in second or third is winning." -- Robert F. Kennedy
by Ted Bartlett on Dec 18, 2008 11:45 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Great points about the secondaries and pass defenses we have faced
We get caught up in thinking htis team can beat anybody when we are on, and not giving enough credit to the best parts of the teams that face us. It seems pretty simple in hindsight: teams in the upper half of the league against the pass have been able to dominate us when our RBs have struggled. Raiders and KC are the exceptions to the rule as we have both won and lost to each of them, irregardless of their respective rankings. I have some thoughts on this.
First, KC. I chalk the loss up to a divisional game and put the blame fully on the Broncos for not protecting the ball. And for the raiders, that first win we had all offseason to prepare a gameplan, Royal was an unknown who pounced on the faders, Hall was an unlucky SOB to draw Royal’s card, and we had a very significant threat of a running game, if for no other reason than no one pays attention to Denver anyways, so they just assumed our rushing attack was as powerful as ever, despite the signs last year that it was tailing off and didn’t have enough talent infused into it anymore. Bear in mind that MSM talking heads saying that we can plug anyone in at RB is a convoluted way of disrespecting the Broncos, since they will never have to give an individual credit for success. instead they can credit an inhuman ‘scheme’ which any team could run if they felt like it. I HATE it when people say we can plug anyone in, and in a dark place in my soul I secretly relish our RB troubles this year because it should be clear that we have great coaches and that it takes a special player to run in our system. Credit where credit is due.
Bottom line, our rushing attack looks pretty pitiful going forward. Just like for the Jets, falcons and browns I think this teams best chance at wins will revolve around teams overlooking us (Jets after the TEN game) and poor secondaries and pass defenses that won’t make Jay struggle.
Our best win of the season was versus the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, because it was balanced, and we had to beat someone at what they do best. Without a running game we can’t do that anymore.
However, we still have the playoffs to look forward to, and we are more than capable of advancing, on Cutler and the passing game alone, but I stand by the thought that we need to draw weak pass defenses to have a chance.
Concision in style, precision in thought, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Dec 18, 2008 12:15 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I hope that is the only dark place in your soul.
At least pertaining to the Denver Broncos.
It all starts in the trenches HT 11/11/08
by firstfan on Dec 18, 2008 12:28 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Run game a bigger factor,
Or the Broncos lack of a run game, was more prominent in their offensive troubles than was the ranking of the opponents pass defense. Look at the games we lost that he mentioned – New England and Miami were both pre-Hillis, and Carolina was post-Hillis. Only the Raider game did Hillis play and that game was lost due to turnovers (2-0) and giving up a special teams TD return. It does not take a rocket science degree to know that if you don’t have a decent run game to keep the defense honest than they can make any QB and passing game look bad (Even Cutler). Of course in all those games, our defense was exposed also. But give Cutler an honest run game, and time, and I guarantee you he can pick apart any defense.
by The Gun Young on Dec 18, 2008 6:59 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Not only Lee...
…but pretty much the whole crew at RMN has my respect. They do a heck of a job, and they are cool enough to reach out to the blogging community. My hat’s off to Lee and the gang at RMN!
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Dec 18, 2008 1:11 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
nice work, guys
i agree with lee(hey, that rhymes) about the missed picks by jay, not only in the previous game, but all season. i guess it’s good he throws a rocket, and only the db’s with soft hands can catch them. the receivers have helped out too, batting down balls thrown up for grabs at the last moment. i even think that “play” is part of the gameplan, to try and get a big gain in the passing game. this is not to rag on jay, because he is the reason we are playing for the division title on sunday. it’s just a ton of pressure is put on our passing game because of other problems with this team.
scheffler, to me, seems to be the key. when he gets involved, the passing game opens up. the run and the defense have been problems all season, but we still scored points through the air when scheff was a target(and healthy). stokely is injured, and basically an afterthought this year, and graham has had a few moments. but when i see scheff catching the ball, i know we are going to be hard to stop. we have 2 good te’s, and a premier, if banged up, slot receiver. once again, please try and use them, the deep stuff just isn’t there
hear me, perpetrators of bread crime, your punishment is at hand.
taste my blintzkrieg!
by davecheffy on Dec 18, 2008 3:42 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Good Points
I definitely agree on the Tony Scheffler comments. It’s amazing what one person will do for Jay’s confidence…
I do have to quibble with you a bit on the Stokley comment though. He has been injured some this year, but he seems to be the first look on quite a few third downs. He may not have many catches this season, but almost all of his have been important (ie an 8 yd gain on 3rd and 7).
by hai17 on Dec 18, 2008 4:35 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I think a LOT
of our 3rd down plays are designed with Stokely as the primary.
Concision in style, precision in thought, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Dec 18, 2008 6:12 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't doubt it
He runs such good routes that it’s hard to ignore him. He does such a good job of making sure he will get the first down, then making his move to get open.
by hai17 on Dec 19, 2008 3:23 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely
Stoke has the talent of a starter and will almost always be in a mis-match situation with a Safety or heaven forbid a LB. He is money though…I like how we use him and hope he sticks around for another 5 years (he could given how he isn’t being used all the time).
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Dec 19, 2008 9:40 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
stokely
and graham, are weapons we just don’t use enough, or complete enough passes to. i’m offering jay/bates an alternative to forcing the ball into double-coverage, something he can do, but very risky. a first down is not a bad alternative to a touchdown, and is more likely to be completed. i like stokely and both te’s in the middle of the field as a mismatch for one of the guys covering them each game. brandon is/was considered the best slot receiver in the game, more accomplished than even welker. we’re paying graham multi-bucks to be a receiving threat, as well as his blocking prowess, and he showed what he could do. protecting jay is more important, if he is still doing that. schef is the man, when healthy. we have had rb’s that can catch the ball, also, and have been. it just seems like too much marshall/royal down-field on 3rd down for my tastes
hear me, perpetrators of bread crime, your punishment is at hand.
taste my blintzkrieg!
by davecheffy on Dec 19, 2008 6:09 PM MST reply actions 0 recs

by 





























