Shannon Sharpe Talks About Broncos' Swoon
Former Bronco Shannon Sharpe didn't get the chance to talk about the demise of the Broncos on his CBS Studio Show because they had obviously signed off. He did have plenty to say, however, when contacted by the Rocky Mountain News earlier today --
What are your thoughts on the Broncos’ late-season collapse, culminated by their loss to the Chargers?
I’m disappointed. You have a three-game lead and you’ve got to take the game at home to Buffalo (a 30-23 loss Dec. 21) so it doesn’t come down to winner-take-all. The defense is not very good. Run. Pass. They need a pass rusher. And Jay Cutler, as talented as he is, he still puts the ball in harm’s way far too many times ... When you look at their defense, they always gave up 500 yards a game. That’s just a shame. I don’t know, if, in the short term, if they can get it fixed because it’s such a glaring weakness. They can’t pressure the quarterback. They can’t stop the run ... That just might be (Denver’s) worst defense in all my years in being associated with the Broncos (since 1990).
How monumental of a collapse is it considering no team ever had lost a three-game division lead with three to play, and what lingering effects might it have?
How does it get any worse? They haven’t been to the playoffs in three years so, what, they’re not going to make it a fourth year in a row? ... I just don’t think they have enough playmakers on the defensive side of the ball ... Honestly, did anybody expect the Broncos to win (Sunday)? Anybody that follows the game knows there’s no way the Broncos were going to win that game. The Chargers were better ... That’s going to hurt for a while. But 52-21. Everybody is going to remember that until September.
Some believe Mike Shanahan can be with the Broncos for about as long as he wants, but do you look at him as being on the hot seat?
I just think they need to do a better job of picking players. You set yourselves up when you take all those (former) Cleveland Browns players, when you move up (in the draft) to take players that don’t pan out ... When you constantly do that year after year, it catches up to you ... Offensively, they have the pieces ... but (not) defensively.
But Shanahan is making the personnel calls (as vice president of football operations)?
The guy’s name on his check is (owner) Pat Bowlen, and Pat Bowlen seems to think he’s doing a good enough job. Far be it for me to tell him what he should do. I just think that, if he’s going to continue in that role, he just has to do a better job of picking talent.
Can Shanahan effectively perform both roles of coaching and personnel, or is that too tough in today’s NFL?
It’s hard to say he can’t because he’s had success doing it. He’s won (two) Super Bowls doing it that way. So why can’t he? Maybe what has happened is he enjoyed so much success so early. His first year he goes 8-8 (in 1995), then we go 13-3 division (title in 1996), and then you get back-to-back Super Bowls (after the 1997 and 1998 seasons). So, naturally, with that progression, everybody thinks every second or third year Mike should be playing for a Super Bowl. Those are unrealistic expectations, but those are expectations Mike has for himself. Once you (win) that Super Bowl, nothing else matters. Mike understands that and (puts) that type of pressure on your need to perform. But there’s no question he has to do a better job of picking talent.
As one of 25 Hall of Fame semifinalists (the list soon will be cut to 15 finalists with four to seven selected Jan. 31 for the Hall), how do you assess your chances?
I’ve taken the test and hopefully the grade I got was good enough ... If somebody would have told me I would have the career I had coming out of Savannah State, I wouldn’t have believed them. Everything I received after the Super Bowls and what I have been able to accomplish in 14 years is icing on the cake ... But there’s nothing I can do about it now. I realize there are a lot of good guys that are worthy.
What would it mean to be the first tight end enshrined in the first year of eligibility?
I don’t want to say I should be a first ballot. I never measured myself up against someone else ... I will sit around antsy like the rest of the guys. I actually will be at (the Super Bowl in Tampa, where the class is announced) to do my radio show. Am I inviting 50 people down there? No.
Where are your Super Bowl rings?
I gave my brother one, and my sister (Libby) now has the other two in a safety deposit box. I don’t wear them. I know I have them. It’s kind of like Bill Gates doesn’t walk around with millions in his pocket, but you know he has it.
Hard to disagree with much of what Sharpe is saying. 2009 is shaping up to be a huge off-season for the Broncos.
1 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
He is wrong !
About taking the cleveland browns players everyone laughed or scoffed when shanny
did that . That lineup took the broncos to the AFC championship game ……..
One game away from a superbowl appearence.
So once again he is wrong.
by broncosfaninphilly on Dec 29, 2008 5:44 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
True, however nothing panned out since then.
He is dead right in the talent. The Broncos need to do a better job at evaluating talent. No more of this, “Let’s give this guy a shot when he had had injury problems or other teams didn’t want him”
"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan
Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 9
by weazel on Dec 29, 2008 7:08 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
we would have much better depth and rotation on the d-line if we kept a few of the Browncos, Gerrard Warren for one :(
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on Dec 29, 2008 7:08 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
He is right about the draft though.
We do need to pick better talent, at least on the defensive side.
by broncoholic on Dec 29, 2008 6:15 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
not really
If you look at the drafts from 2004-2007, 40% of the defensive players taken turned into starters (giving Thomas the benefit of the doubt). That’s actually better than league average. But, in the last five years we have only used 14 out of 36 draft positions on defensive players. Is it any wonder that our offensive has improved while our defense has remained stagnate?
We don’t need to pick better; we need to pick more, more defensive players; something approaching a 50/50 mix instead of the 70 offensive to 30 defensive mix we have been doing.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Dec 29, 2008 7:20 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
But our starters aren't good. If they were that good, then why isn't our defense an elite defense?
by broncoholic on Dec 29, 2008 7:22 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
the ones we drafted are
from 2004-2007 we drafted 10 defensive players (out of 27 total) including DJ Williams, Darrent Williams, Dumerville, and Thomas. DJ is all-pro caliber and the others are good enough. The problem is that we have a lot of others, like Webster, who would be subs on most other teams. BUT if we had drafted more defensive players with the same success rate we would probably have another star like DJ and two to three other starters. Even with the Darrent Williams tragedy we would be substantially more talented than we are today.
The problem isn’t that we have done poorly drafting defensively. Its that while our old stalwarts like Wilson & Pryce got worn out and injured, and other players moved on, we failed to draft replacements for them, investing only 1/3 of our draft picks on the defense. Instead we tried to fill the gaps with the castoffs of other teams (Bly and Bailey excepted).
When we’ve drafted defensive players we’ve done okay, but we just haven’t drafted enough defensive players.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Dec 29, 2008 8:56 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
as far as talent...
B-Marsh, Scheffy, Cutler, Royal, Harris, Kuper, Hamilton, Thomas, DJ (and Darrent for that matter) Williams, Woodyard….perhaps he needs to do more on the defensive side of the ball. Seems like Bates and Slowik both scrapped our d-lines and couldn’t form anything serious to show from it.
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on Dec 29, 2008 7:11 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I was going to mention
the offensive talent. Shanny has been nothing short of genius at that the last three years. But Sharpe was probably alluding more to the defensive side since that is the unit of which he was the most critical. For all the Cutlers and Marshalls Shanny picked, he really whiffed on the Manuels and Koutouvides, apparently . . .
Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy
by AZDynamics on Dec 29, 2008 8:13 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Not really a wiff
Mike Shanahan and Pat B. chose the lower cost route this year rather than the usual “spend a lot” free agency route. This time they got what they paid for – backups.
Victor Frankl:
What man actually needs is not a tensionless state but rather the striving and struggling for some goal worthy of him. What he needs is not the discharge of tension at any cost, but the call of a potential meaning waiting to be fulfilled by him.
Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms – to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.
by wyoeng on Dec 29, 2008 9:41 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Good points
I don’t think that anyone this week has mentioned that coup de grace to our defensive chances – the dreaded Bates housecleaning that decimated our stock of talent, thin as it was, on the front lines.
Shanahan bears the responsibility – he signed off on it. But Bates asked to hire and fire ‘his guys’ and that included the Warren debacle, a couple of big immobile tubs at the end of their careers and several other decisions too hideous to mention. It will take a couple – heck, a few – years to recover from that.
Shanahan has earned a rep for taking flyers on players like D. Gardener, M.Clarrett (a 3rd rounder!?) and others. It was Ok once in a while – but it caught up to us as well (as did Sundquist, IMHO). I believe that the Goodman’s will pull us out, but it isn’t going to be quick.
We can debate the Slowik issue at length, and there are factors on both sides. But until he has a front 7 that can play NFL football he will always be trying to minimize the damage the opposing O’s do to us rather than going after them and inflicting our will. That’s a Rx for failure in the NFL, and that’s where we are.
Jim Goodman for Broncos MVP!
by Emmett Smith on Dec 30, 2008 10:35 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Such a Bear-ish outlook.
Average Raider Fan's IQ = 89
Bill Williamson's IQ = 75
Find yours by clicking here.
by kwool79 on Dec 30, 2008 5:29 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

by 




































