http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9907E3D71139F93BA15756C0A960958260

First, getting DJ out of the way, yes, I was going for the dramatic effect that comes from applying philosophical axioms to football players.  As the rest of the series is put up, my purpose should become more clear, and I will hint only that the application of these laws reaffirms what you are saying about DJ, but condemn another aspect of this mess.

Now the fun:

I don't know how into this you want to get, but I will launch a preemptory salvo.  First lets consider the Law of Non-Contradiction in its corollary form, the law of Identity.  A=A  They both say the same thing, just in different manners that highlight different aspects of the Law.  To take umbrage with non-contradiction is to take umbrage with identity.

Now, the Law of Identity (and thus its corollaries) are axiomatic.  That means they are irreducible primaries inherent in all knowledge.  This isn't a matter of preference either.  The key to any axiom is that it must be used in any attempt to refute it.  In order for quantum mechanics to disprove the law of identity (which the wave-particle duality attempts to do) it has to do experiments--which relies on the law of identity.  All that they are proving is that more (in this case, MUCH more) information about the experiment is needed to explain the results.

The experiment you are linking to has been given some hypothetical explanations, and so have all experiments that revolve around the wave-particle duality.  All solutions involve assigning an identity to the environment of the experiment.  In all the mathematical models used to quantify quantum mechanical experiments, the environment needs to be equal to 0 (no effect), and in practice they conduct the experiments in vaccuums.  But vaccuum is misleading:  the STUFF of existence is still in there, and it is that stuff that has no known properties, and no means of being measured (yet).  But as quantum mechanics (and other theoretical disciplines) get smaller and smaller, they get closer and closer to seeing that STUFF's effect on their experiments.  Wave-particle duality is considered to be one of the first perceptions of the nature of that stuff.

Whew!  Is your interest in this professional or otherwise?  Just in case I'm going overboard, (or not overboard enough! ;))

1.  DJ's "natural" position.  I am with you 100% that at this point in his career draping one position on DJ and calling it a fit leaves him scantily clad at best.  I think at LB, though, you can definitely rule him out at SAM.  I'll describe the SAM situation more in the next article, but he would be misused and abused at the position.  But I think I was inbounds saying that as a rookie, WILL was a "natural" fit for DJ.  HT has been inundating me with info on the LB positions, and much of what I have absorbed indicates to me that DJ isn't just a superb WLB, but the IDEAL WLB.  Of course, hoosierteacher quickly would point out here that you don't need your greatest skillset at WLB, since any fast talented guy could have an impact there.
2.  You don't want to toss DJ aside like his contributions at MLB are an everyday occurrence.  If he wants it, he should be first in line.  I am VERY sympathetic to this viewpoint.  It was my primary outlook on the position UNTIL our FA signings.  The signings opened my eyes to not only other opportunities, but to a wider integration of what seems to be involved here.  I see a major problem with the Denver defense (that could very well affect the whole organization) and DJ and his impending move(s) are at the heart of it.  I really hope I can do an effective job of communicating what I am seeing to everybody here.