Mile High Report: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Broncos Add Some Beef To D-Line, Trade For Dewayne Robertson Complete

The Denver Broncos on Thursday acquired defensive tackle Dewayne Robertson in a trade from the New York Jets, Head Coach Mike Shanahan announced.

In exchange, the Broncos sent the Jets a conditional pick in the 2009 NFL Draft. The Broncos also on Thursday waived center Norm Katnik.

Robertson (6-foot-1, 310 pounds) is a sixth-year player who joins the Broncos after playing his first five professional seasons with the Jets. New York selected him with the fourth overall pick of the 2003 NFL Draft from the University of Kentucky. In 77 career regular-season games (75 starts), Robertson has totaled 319 tackles (188 solo), 14.5 sacks (106 yds.), four forced fumbles, two fumble recoveries and two pass breakups.  He also has totaled 18 tackles (11 solo) in three career playoff games (3 starts).



Robertson has played every game in four of his five seasons and missed only three games for his career. He saw time on 75.4 percent of the Jets’ defensive snaps in 2007, 82.5 percent in 2006 and a career-high 85.8 percent in 2004.

At Kentucky, Robertson played 32 games (31 starts) for his career and received second-team All-Southeastern Conference honors as a junior.

An honorable mention USA Today All-American at Melrose High School in Memphis, Tenn., Robertson was born on Oct. 16, 1981.
Poll
Dewayne Robertson to the Broncos for a conditional pick in the 2009 draft....You Like?
Hell Yea!!
183 votes
No way....Remember the 'Browncos'?
12 votes

195 votes | Poll has closed

1 recs  |  Comment 21 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

What does a 2009 Conditional pick mean?

Is it a 1-3 round pick or 4-7? The bigger question is, Guru going to be ranting about his third round pick next year too!? ;)

by Tim Lynch on Apr 24, 2008 9:52 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Here's a clue

Denver’s offer of a 7th round pick was turned down. Cincy had offered two low picks, and those were turned down too. My guess is that the terms include next to nothing if he doesn’t play much, and if he plays “often and well” we’ll give up a mid rounder.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Apr 25, 2008 6:15 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let's see...

D-Line? That skill-level just went WAY up. Should we still draft a DT this year? Yes. Do we HAVE to do it in the second round? No. Denver could return to the Texas well (Tim Crowder and Selvin Young anyone?) and find a way to pick up DT Frank Okam later on, which could open up a play maker pick or best available pick in round two.

It’s not like they went out and got a whole defensive line from another team…it IS just one player. No matter what, D-Rob’s still an improvement over what they have now (and he has actually played in the playoffs before as well).

by phantom818 on Apr 24, 2008 10:00 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

What a Relief

Now we don’t have to draft a DT, although we surely should and will, probably even two. This really solidifies the d-line and gives us immediate help. Whoever we draft will help us down the road, but D-Rob makes us better right now. This is the icing on the cake of a very successful off-season of free agent acquisitions. Rather than sign one megastar who, after all, can only play one position at a time and would have cost us dearly, we’ve given ourselves depth at safety and center, and have upgraded two linebacker positions, defensive tackle, and wide receiver. Now we really can draft the best player available when it comes our turn, and we can draft for the future instead of for immediate needs. (Even if we take Clady or Williams as our first pick, it’s not certain either would start ahead of Kuper or Harris. If there’s one thing Shanny knows it’s the offensive line, and if he thinks we’re okay we probably are.) That means we can use the draft to build the team, not just rescue it from impending disaster. I can’t wait to see how well D-Rob performs when he’s not playing out of position. Right now I see no glaring holes, although we can still use some depth at DT. All the mags and sites have been talking about all the holes the Broncos need to fill. Now there aren’t any. Beautiful.

"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen

by spock on Apr 24, 2008 10:50 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Plus,

I believe Clady ran a zone blocking type scheme with the “Jr. Broncos” and I recall him saying that Denver would be the team that he could see himself fitting in with. Now that the Chiefs can focus on a defensive pass rush with the top five selection (which they should) and can wait until their 17th to go offensive tackle, I think that takes one more team off the board that might’ve taken Clady. Many have Clady ahead of Williams anyway on the big board, and I know comparisons have been made in the past between the two, especially by one of our own (styg).

by phantom818 on Apr 24, 2008 11:15 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Indeed

I like Williams slightly better than Clady but would be happy with either one. If they’re both available it’ll be interesting to see which one Shanahan picks. Either might start immediately, but even if he doesn’t I think chances are good we’ll end up with a perennial all-pro at LT.

"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen

by spock on Apr 25, 2008 8:06 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

In forehand

this off-season has been a thing of beauty. Maybe it’s just Bronco-fans being overly optimistic, but i looove this signing. espesially the twist, that we don’t need to pay with draftpicks from the most important draft-year since the Elway-draft. AND the pick is based on production – if he stinks (he will not!) we get him cheap!

/The great Dane - formerly known as Claaaaas!

by Claus Vestergaard on Apr 24, 2008 11:06 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I can see it now

Shanny and him have a talk and he says “son you need to suck this year so we can keep our top picks and give the jets a seventh rounder. You do that you get an extra mill” Im only kidding of course. I think the condition would be 3/4 or 6/7 thats how these things usually go. If hes good you get a 3 or 4 and if hes bad you get a 6 or 7 ie plummer!

Davis to the Hall!

by Jon Tollerud on Apr 24, 2008 11:22 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Jimmy Johnson did something similar

to the Minnesota Vikings. He benched them all and loaded up on a bunch of picks and three years later they were in the Super Bowl…of course we’re just talking about one late pick here. lol

by Tim Lynch on Apr 25, 2008 7:50 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here's what I'm thinking.

First, this is an incredible move for Denver. Denver gets a player at DT and only has to pay what he is worth in terms of a conditional pick. If he’s a bust, then we don’t give up much. If he’s great, he’s worth giving up a higher pick. I agree with Jon’s range in his comment above.

Second, I believe that there is more of a question mark with DRob than any assurance. I still think Denver should go for a DT or two in the draft. I’m not sold on DRob yet, but I’m not ready to predict that he’ll be a bust either. He could go either way.

Third, I’m starting to think that Denver is going to go hard and fast for covering the offensive line this year. If Kuper plays at OT we have Harris as a back-up. We have nothing real behind Hamilton and Holland at OG (in my opinion). I think that FA pick-up Wiegmann is a terrific back-up for Nalen, but a stop-gap that will retire soon after Nalen leaves.

Fourth, with the excellent moves in the reloading season at SAF, LB, and WR (and with the money we saved), we have much more ability to go for “best available” rather than “need”. Again, we can’t put all of our hopes in DRob for DT, but the move does give us more flexibility in the draft.

Fifth, if Denver is scared that both CLady and WIlliams might go before the 12th pick, I wouldn’t be shocked to watch them trade up to get either player. Fans would scream bloody murder, but Mike has shown before that he fears other teams taking “his guy”.

Last, I want to reiterate the old defensive axiom that “One good DT makes 2 good DTs”. IF DRob (or someone else from the draft) steps in and is excellent, that creates a dynamic on the line that makes the other DT’s job so much easier that you get the effect of two good DTs. Because our DTs have been so weak, our whole defense has suffered. In my mind, just one good DT would have a ripple effect that will increase the defense as a whole.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Apr 25, 2008 6:31 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

Denver can still go for a guy like Trevor Laws (who’s a hard worker) to develop and not necessarily right away. Pat Sims and Dre Moore are right in the discussion as well. However, they can still get decent DTs later in the draft.

Third, I’m starting to think that Denver is going to go hard and fast for covering the offensive line this year. If Kuper plays at OT we have Harris as a back-up.

We could get that “safe OT pick” in the first round this year, and develop them to work in the Denver system. I also thought that Haris and Pears were slated for the tackle starters next season, with Kuper staying inside. That would make more sense if Denver went OT in the top rounds. I was wondering what they’d do with the line-up on the offensive line.

Fourth, with the excellent moves in the reloading season at SAF, LB, and WR (and with the money we saved), we have much more ability to go for "best available" rather than "need". Again, we can’t put all of our hopes in DRob for DT, but the move does give us more flexibility in the
draft.

This is pretty nice, because that means we could go Harvey or Mendenhall early if he’s there (unless the Broncos decide to take one of the tackles, which I’ll be equally happy about). ALSO, if a guy like Chris Johnson were to be there in the second, the Broncos could even take a look at HIM. I think the DT trade may impact the second round pick more than anything (although Denver could still go DT for some young depth). Any help for Thomas and McKinley is welcomed.

by phantom818 on Apr 25, 2008 8:17 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Phantom

I thought that Harris and Pears were the OTs too. But Shanhan held a conferance where he announced that Kuper was the projected starter at weak OT (Pears on the right), and Colbert was projected as #2 receiver.

We’ll see what happens in camp. Harris (I read) looks very good in practice and camp, but has never started a game. Kuper is a solid player, and has experience at OT in his past.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Apr 25, 2008 9:00 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Woah, woah, woah

You mean Colbert was the projected number two with Marshall out…correct? Kerry’s never gone past a number two receiver I don’t believe, not even last season when Jarrett was in the house. I like the player (receivers deep in depth charts intrigue me sometimes), but I want to see how things play out in camp first.

Also, it made sense to me that with Kuper at Guard again, the Broncos would be somewhat set at the O-Line, at least in terms of a starting line-up, and could draft that offensive tackle. I’m not worried about Kuper at tackle, but I guess this means an offensive tackle in the first isn’t so much of a priority anymore (although it could still be important). If we end up needing that much help at the guard position, maybe Denver would ultimately have to go with a guy like Branden Albert in the first if he’s there. Could that make sense? I guess “projected starters” could always change.

by phantom818 on Apr 25, 2008 10:06 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nope (on the question about Colbert)

Colbert is the projected #2 behind Marshall. Marshall is likely to be ready to go by training camp. (He missed a lot of last year pre-camp too, but at least this year he got in time with Cutler and Scheff before the injury), and Shanahan seems to be confident that Colbert is a good fit for #2.

Remember also that Stokely is not an every down WR, and Martinez is not #2 quality. With Marshall, Scheff (and at times Stokely too) playing on the strong side, Colbert should be ok. Besides, I don’t think his role will be so much to catch much, but to be just enough of a threat on the weakside to keep the safeties honest.

As to Kuper, I think he’ll do well too. But now that he moves to OT we have only Holland and Hamilton at OG. Hamilton is a concussion away from retirement. We have solid starters, but nothing in the way of depth.

At OT we have Harris, who looks very good but hasn’t played a game yet. At OC we have Wiegmann, who is solid but old enough to retire soon after Nalen. Keep in mind that there is a better than even chance Nalen and hamilton retire at the end of this year. We need depth now, and a couple of years to develop future starters. That’s why I think the OL is a priority, even if immediate starters are in place.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Apr 25, 2008 10:32 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stop Gap Type Thing Goin' On, But With Our Current Players

It is only a matter of time before the last remnants of the successful Denver line fade into retirement. I was wondering if you think this could mean Denver goes guard in the draft. Harris is young, and I think Kuper and Pears aren’t that old either. No one’s discussed Albert (who’s played a little guard himself and can play tackle as well at Virginia I believe), so I was wondering if Kuper’s “switch” would change what Denver wants to do in the draft in terms of the offensive line. The strategy MN posted below doesn’t seem too terrible…however, that would only be IF a trade could be made (if).

by phantom818 on Apr 25, 2008 10:37 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

The Kuper move to OT makes us more in need of an OG. But Denver is not averse to switching players between roles either. If they go for a high OL, his position won’t be as important as if he can play the position Denver wants to fit him into.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Apr 25, 2008 11:02 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it's safe to say . . .

. . .that all of us are pretty happy with how this turned out. We’re not risking much and if he does work out, and chances are good that he will, we’ll be sitting pretty. With the other d-line players having a year of experience under their belts, and with Doom entering what might be a break-out season (scary!), it looks like our greatest weakness might be morphing into a strength. I think you’re right about Denver emphasizing the o-line, and I’ll be equally unsurprised to see them move up if necessary. Ditto about the ripple effect. Good post.

"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen

by spock on Apr 25, 2008 8:20 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Effect on the draft

With the number of reloading season pickups the Broncos have done so far, it would make sense to me that they are going to package later picks to try and move up, not from #12, but at least for a 3rd or even another 2nd or possibly even back into the late 1st.

This was not my idea, I read it somewhere else, but try this on for size: Denver takes either Mendenhall or Stewart at #12, then packages some later picks to move back into the late 1st round to pick up the tackle out of BC, Cherilus. This year’s draft is pretty deep at the OT spot (After Long, there’s Clady, WIlliams, Otah, Albert all 1st rounders), so they can afford to take BPA at #12 and still land a cornerstone guy. Personally, I’d be happy with that scenario as I still think it’d leave the Broncos with a shot at some of the 2nd tier DT’s (Laws, Okam, et al).

Or so I'm told.

by MN Bronco on Apr 25, 2008 9:31 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

That's not a bad idea either.

This recent news has certainly changed the Denver strategy and possibilities, as well as OUR outlook and hopes for the future. Go Broncos!

by phantom818 on Apr 25, 2008 10:08 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought about this too

I’m not sure what it would take to move up from early-ish 2nd round to late 1st, but it does seem to be within reach, more so now that the trade for Robertson didn’t take any picks this year (and IMO, a major tip of the hat to Shanahan for that trade!)

However, I’m not sure that moving back into the first is the right thing to do. There’s a big part of me that says, “Yes, they should do it! Pick up Stewart/Mendenhall, plus a 1st round LT!!!” But I think that leaves a hole on the team: talented depth. Dewayne Robertson is a great pickup, but he isn’t a sure thing; I still think Denver needs a DT in this draft…but now a 4th round DT gives quality depth, rather than a rookie that will be counted on a little too much. Also, Denver’s field position the last couple of years has been horrendous! The offense has put up yardarge, but when they usually start behind their own 20, there’s a lot more time for drives to sputter out (leaving field goals instead of TDs, and punts instead of field goals.) An improved defense will, of course, help this…but special teams needs a major shot in the arm (of B-12 and flax seed oil, of course…) Since special teams units are filled, for the most part, with backup players, the more talent you have in your backups, the better your special teams units will be. Give this offense a little more talent (already done with the receivers) and better starting field position, and I think a lot of problems will disappear.

by Disco_Stu on Apr 25, 2008 10:39 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmmm

I’ve felt all off-season that Denver has had some sneaky master plan going on that will result in an epic draft day and a total bomb in the first round. Personally, I’m dying for Denver to take Stewart. Okay, maybe not dying, but I’d love it very much. The idea of drafting a tackle in the first has never felt that great to me (though I’m admittedly very gunshy after the George Foster Fiasco). And I have a pretty large mancrush on Phillip Wheeler (I agree ejruiz, he isn’t the right fit for us, but I

Gah, can draft day JUST BE HERE ALREADY? I have all these notes on players I really like sitting here and a plan in place for a steady stream of pizza and wings. This is my Super Bowl. I spend every year waiting for this to come around, and hurr it is. All plans are in place, media center is properly prepped (I have the drafting of Cutler on DVD somewhere around here), and my hopes are sky-high. Please let this draft not go the way of Willie Middlebrooks.

by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 25, 2008 12:01 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!
Start posting about the Broncos »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hillis_small
When Things Don't Make Sense
800px-john_brown_painting_small
Out of hiding: Mdierk's take on the season
Kirk_and_allie_small
UPON FURTHER REVIEW - Scouting The Steelers
Hillis_small
The Weekly "I'm Tired..." Rant
Cutlerjersey_small
The Broncos Success - Is it Orton or McDaniels?

Recent FanPosts

Bronco_small
Chalk up 2 more NFC East Very winable games
Eddie-royal_small
Monday Night No-Huddle
Bronco-pride_small
Ranging Quarterbacks, A Comparison
Denver_broncos_small
Jack Williams... My opinion
Broncos-1024x768_small
Holic's Week 9 Predictions...
Turtle2_small
RiG's week 9 picks ATS
Walter_small
THE LEGENDARY SECONDARY
Hillis_small
Is There Value in Losing?
Luff3_small
More Simmons Love...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Behind the Steel Curtain
BTSC Weekly NFL Musings - Week 9 Edition
Blogging The Boys
Understudy Sunday: the Cowboys Outslug the Eagles 20-16
Blogging The Boys
Cowboys First In East, Beat Philly 20-16

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

MHR Radio

SPONSORS

Web Stuff


iPing-it!

Listed on BlogShares

Sports blogs Sports Blogs
Top NFL Fan Sites
Best Football Sites

Rate Me on BlogHop.com!
the best pretty good okay pretty bad the worst

Top Blogs
Sports Blogs




General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

Aristotle_small Jeremy Bolander

Asst. Head Coach

Mhr_small Steve Nichols

Tahoetim_small Tim Lynch

J_elway_870111_640_small Douglas A. Lee

Plato_bust_small Emmett Smith

Denver-broncos-button_small Ted Bartlett

The-big-lebowski_small TJ Johnson

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk