2008 NFL Draft - Grade The Broncos Two First Picks
Before the draft I expressed my deisre for the Broncos to trade down. I kept hope alive all the way until Roger Goodell said Ryan Clady's name. It isn't that don't like Clady. Just the opposite. On MHR Radio the other night, I called Clady the safest pick for the Broncos if he was there, and by the sounds of Mike Shahahan he thought the same thing.
There were plenty of trades, which speaks to the sheer fluidity of this draft. That doesn't mean it is easy to get a deal done. It was becoming clear with all the movement around the Broncos that they weren't going to be able to get something done. At that point the Broncos had no choice but to punt and take the best fit.
Clady gives the Broncos something on the O-Line they haven't had in a long time. Natural, God-given talent. The Broncos have gotten so much out of guys drafted in the late round, so much over-achievement, that at some point you need to add real talent to the equation. Clady is that guy, the 2nd best OT on the board, behind only Jake Long, the #1 overall pick.
The Broncos have tried this before, we all are still trying to forget George Foster, but Clady is different. To hear him talk, to see his answers to the meda after the selection, shows an intelligence that Foster never had. That intelligence, along with his comfort in a zone-blocking scheme, should help Clady come right in and make an impact.
The Broncos most important asset is Jay Cutler. Cutler needs protected and Clady should give Cutler that protection for the next decade. For that, I can't help but be satisfied.
In the 2nd Round, the Broncos drafted the KR/PR we have been clammoring for. Eddie Royal might be a name that you aren't familiar with, and it may have been a bit of a reach, but with no 3rd round pick the Broncos had no choice but to get the guy the needed right at #42.
Royal was a 4-year player at Virginia Tech, a big-time football school, and made significant contributions all 4 season. Again, what was most impressive to me, and Styg did a nice job talking about this, is this kid's character. He was very well-spoken, spoke of being a team player, of doing whatever he could do for the team.
Royal will instantly improve our return game and that alone makes him worth it. Remember, in the SBNation Mock Draft I selected Chris Johnson at #42. We needed a guy to make plays day 1. Royal will come in and do that. He also provides insurance for Brandon Stokely, whose injury history speaks for itself. Only DeSean Jackson could have provided the same spark. The difference? Character.
Overall, I give these first two selections a solid B. The Broncos have several needs and both of these picks are attempts to address them. There was no surprise. There, was no reach for a guy with a questionable past. It is time the Broncos brought in players we could be proud of. It looks like that has started today.
0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
Eddie Royal
I can’t believe we drafted a special teamer at the top of the 2nd round. Don’t we have other more glaring holes to fill? I would even have hesitation about drafting Devin Hester at the top of the 2nd round. I mean these guys aren’t even every down players. I can’t think of one top team who has spent a 2nd round pick to solve a special teams problem. Why don’t we draft more position players who play frequently and who can contribute on special teams coverage? Maybe some defenders who can also play special teams. It’s just so frustrating to waste picks when we need more depth.
I do like the Clady pick though. I actually love that pick.
by Mr. Irrelevant on Apr 26, 2008 10:31 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
A guy like Royal
is going to be, at worst, Roscoe Parrish of the Bills, and at best, Steve Smith of the Panthers. he’s stronger than Parrish, and looks to be a bit quicker and a bit better in the return game. As much as I wanted a DT or other player in a major area of need, I’ve already grown to like this guy. His good personality and athleticism will make him at least an above-average slot reciever, allowing for us to eventually drop the inhury-prone Brandon Stokely. I don’t see this guy being as good as Devin Hester (when Hester is actually good…), but I do see his special teams contributions as a major upgrade needed for all great teams.
For the record, I HATE Devin Hester. The guy muffs too many times to be considered so great. In the Denver-Chicago game last season, Hester actually reached behind himself and stretched out to touch the ball, just to see it bouce away and get picked up by a Bronco. IMO, Josh Cribbs of Cleveland is the best all-around KR/PR in the NFL.
"I could never quite get the hang f Thursdays..."
by FlaBroncoFan on Apr 26, 2008 10:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
In fairness to Stokely
He was hurt playing for Indy in ‘06, yes. But when injured in Denver it was only after being forced to be an every down receiver after Walker went down. Putting Stokely in that position was forced, but Shanahan went so far as to admit it wasn’t fair to Stokely.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Apr 27, 2008 12:11 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome aboard amigo!
Is that like the 5th Ramone?
Seriously though, I look at where Denver was and none of the guys who followed really seem like great picks (of course, I’m a guy who wouldn’t look at a player like Trevor Laws outside of the late 3rd round, what traditionally would be a late day 1 pick). There is no way that Denver crowds the outside LB depth at this point, since Winborn and Webster aren’t going anywhere.
I will say that Denver probably felt like they would get a shot at ILB Curtis Lofton here, but alas, it was not to be. But when life gives you lemons, you gotta make lemonade. Royal is a day one contributor to one of the three most important needs for this team: field position. Round one we dealt with red zone offense (not solved, mind you, but invested in, no doubt) and now we need to see what options exist for Denver to stop the run. DT Red Bryant with the #109 would be a pleasant surprise…
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 26, 2008 11:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you like the 5th D-Bag?
You talk too much pretty boy.
by stud on Apr 27, 2008 7:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
B/B+
I love the pick of Eddie Royal, and I don’t think it was a reach at #42. Just take a look at the run of WR/KR guys that ran off the board during the 2nd round (heck Dexter Jackson was a 4th rounder everyone thought, and he went at #58). We got a guy who will make an impact this year in the return game – both KR and PR. If he’s able to add and average of 10 yards to every starting position we have it will immensely help both our offense and defense. He’s also a guy who can learn from Stokely in the slot (assuming the usual year or two progression from drafting a WR). He’s strong and loves to block, and best of all, he’s a good character guy who can develop into a team leader.
I wasn’t as high on Clady as others were, mostly because I wanted us to trade down (though looking at the trade down value, it was WAY less than even I thought it would be), but it’s a solid pick and it shouldn’t take as much time to work him into the starting job. I am hoping that he develops into an elite LT and is protecting Cutler’s backside for the next 12 years. Shanahan already came out and said he expects Clady to start from day one. WOW.
The surprise for me in this draft was that there wasn’t any surprises. After all the wheeling & dealing of the last few years, we just sat there and drafted the guys we wanted as they fell to us.
by Darin H on Apr 26, 2008 11:13 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I like these picks
For better or worse, I always root for our draft picks until they prove me wrong. Building the O-line is overdue and we FINALLY have a threat in the return game. All season I have been lobbying to balance the receiving corps by having a Steve Smith type WR/returner and if Royal has a best case scenario development potential of being another Steve Smith then he is very welcome.
Punt returners are special receivers, anyone remember our last WR that also returned punts, a guy by the name of Rod Smith? PRs are tough and have nerves of steel, lots of WRs with speed and moves can’t be PRs (anyone remember Ashley Lelie or Chris Cole or Herb Haygood?). We need to be glad that we have a young WR who can help the team immediately in the Special Teams capacity while he is learning play receiver at the NFL level.
by Arctic Bronco on Apr 26, 2008 11:27 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Would there have been
anyother scenario that would have made you happier today?
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 26, 2008 11:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
A better scenario would have been
seeing John Madden get traded for Jarod the Subway Hero.
by Arctic Bronco on Apr 27, 2008 1:22 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts are all too well documented
throughout the draft day threads, but I wanted to pop in here and let everyone know that we amassed 1238 comments for the draft today. I haven’t checked any other blogs to see how they fared, but that’s still a whole of participation considering it’s approximately 6 hours of watching guys sit at a desk and talk. The support at MHR is just fantastic. Hoping for another good turn-out tomorrow!
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 26, 2008 11:46 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
SlamDTF, Zap, Phantom, Silverblood
and so many more! You guys really made today’s threads a success! Kudos to the community!!
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 27, 2008 12:00 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am going to surprise alot of you, but I voted to give us an
A thus far for Day 1. Yea, I hate the Clady pick…but not because he isn’t good but because I wanted a top tier runner. I will call Clady “George Foster II” until he makes a Pro Bowl. :P
I love the Eddie Royal pick. I think he has the character and heart to develop into a Steve Smith type of threat.
I’ll be on tomorrow a little late…went to a friends house(dolphins fan no less LOL) and drank some more so I need some sleep. :)
by Tim Lynch on Apr 26, 2008 11:59 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Go to bed zappa....
long day tomorrow. Oh wait, you’re west coast. nevermind. :)
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 27, 2008 12:00 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea, but that means I gotta get up at 6am!!!
West Coast sucks for Day 2 draft times. lol I guess its good we dont have a third rounder…extra sleep for me! :)
by Tim Lynch on Apr 27, 2008 12:01 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Royal Reach
Eddie was a Royal reach here. Hey Shanny, ever heard of safeties? You needed one there, like Johnson or Reggie Smith. A MLB might have been good there as well.
by PABlzrfn on Apr 27, 2008 12:47 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Three thoughts...
1. No, Shanny has never heard of safeties. (Re: Nelson in 2007)
2. What MLB did you have in mind? I was hoping Lofton would be around, but that didn’t work out.
3. Royal doesn’t look like as much of a reach if the Broncos were putting top priority on high character guys, since he has one of the best attitudes among the receivers in this draft.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 27, 2008 1:09 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the kid from Arkansas State
was a strong Cover 2 type of safety, not necessarily a fit for our system. Also, I’m not sure which MLB you would have advocated us taking at that point, but I think Denver stuck to their guns and went with guys of value over targeting (thus probably reaching) specific positions. In a game of chess, this was the more conservative approach where you let the situation come to you, and you read and react.
In terms of Reggie Smith, the guy is one of those hybrid CB/S types. I’m not sure we want to keep going that route. Yeah, versatility is nice, but taking a guy based on positional needs and not what your evaluations (and as such, value of a player) dictate is a way to fail in the draft.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 27, 2008 1:11 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Forgot to add
That Reggie Smith IS still on the board, so it’s not like the possibility is dead. It’s not like the chance to grab is has long passed us by. We have the ammo to move up if we feel like there’s a kid we need.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 27, 2008 1:14 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
Safety is my favorite position. But no way DEN takes a safety in the second round. THe best safety in the draft was Phillips, and that’s only in a weak safety draft class. We still have Hamza and Lynch, and went out and picked up two safeties in FA. Even though they are both stop-gaps until the draft next year, they are upgrades over Ferguson (whom we cut in ‘07). Either way, next year is projected to be deep at safety, and that’s when DEN will likely pull the trigger.
At MLB we have a starter already. Seatle hated to lose K2, who would have been a starter if it wasn’t for their current ace. He was a team captain (even as a back-up), so he has the leadership. He also has the speed to play in either projected system that Slowik will run (zone blitz or show blitz). He was a steal of a FA acquisition.
I like the idea of getting rid of Beck and bringing in a decent back-up at MLB, but with Royal we get a starter at punt returns (and probably kick returns), and a player that will back Stokely at slot, but is good enough to be a slot receiver.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Apr 27, 2008 1:15 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ark. St Kid
I didn’t know Tyrell was a Cover-2 type safety. People had the Giants taking him, and I don’t think they run Cover 2, but I could be wrong. As far as an MLB is concerned, maybe Johnathan Goff of Vandy might have been a fit to give Niko some competition. But if character is why they drafted Royal, then it makes sense. I agree that Denver needs to start looking at that a lot more.
by PABroncofan on Apr 27, 2008 1:15 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't know much about him
but it was mentioned that he would likely excel in the Cover 2, so hearing that it made sense we didn’t grab him. When our pick came up, I wondered if we might be thinking of him. Also, Goff is also still on the board, and likely will be in the 4th when we pick. He’s slotted right in that area. If he goes in the 3rd, I think it will be a reach.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 27, 2008 1:18 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
For the record
I’m only still up because I’m making up a list of players I think Denver might target (and would like them to target) and where they might be available. Ahhh, this is great fun. I love the draft. It’s coming along pretty well. There is an awful lot of talent left to be had, and I’m looking forward to seeing it head to the Mile High City.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 27, 2008 1:25 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
You and me both
Is it just me or does it look like we have DT in our VERY near future. ;)
And if Chauncey Washington isn’t on your list, please add him. Not that Denver is going to target a RB, but I can’t let a thread go by it seems without throwing his name out there…
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 27, 2008 1:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
With DRob signed to a 5 year deal....
...is it possible that DEN thinks the DT situation is solved? The deal was great, but DRob isn’t a sure thing either (at least in my book).
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Apr 27, 2008 1:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey
I’ve a ton of your stuff, but I don’t believe I’ve ever directly responded to it. You do fantastic work here and it’s always a pleasure reading what’s on your mind. As to your question…
I don’t at all think they ignored the position today, just they stuck to their draft board and were true to it, as opposed to the past approach of “this position is a need, let’s play off that instead of our board”. I think they believe it wasn’t as pressing an issue because I think they have more confidence in Robertson and Thomas than we’ve given them credit for.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 27, 2008 1:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks so much for the kind words Slam!
It does seem that Denver is looking at “best” over “need”, though the Clady pick was both in my opinion. Still, I hope DRob works out. The deal for him was excellent, but Thomas isn’t a dominator and DRob is still a question mark. If DRob works out then both Thomas and McKinley will look much improved.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Apr 27, 2008 1:49 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
no to Washington
Even though he has shown flashes he was injured way too much.BEing here in SD I force fed USC, and he has been hurt since day 1 at USC. The Broncos dont need any more injury prone RB’s. As much as I like Selvin Young, he also has an injury problem. I hope they shore up their defense in day 2. Man thats early here in SOCAL.
by broncfanstuckinsd on Apr 27, 2008 3:09 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hahaha, oh Styg
I started with RB, and Chauncey Washington is at the top of my list. And As I read this, DT is the list I’m working on now. To be honest, I’m not totally interested in the 7th round projections, because it seems like an absolute crapshoot. Any other players you might wanna recommend, so I can see if I already have him? Also, what DTs do you have in mind? I see 3 that really intrigue.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 27, 2008 1:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agonized
over whether to give an A or a B+. I think the selection of Royal is in a way a tribute to styg50’s championing of Chris Johnson, because the Broncos did go for that type of player on their second pick. In fact, I suspect they would have taken CJ if he’d been available. He’s even faster than Royal and at 15 lbs heavier should be a little more durable. That’s why I thought of giving a B+. But if we’d traded up to get him we’d have given up too many chances to get lucky on the second day. In a crap shoot there’s strength in numbers. I’m also impressed by Shanahan saying he targeted Royal all along (although I don’t believe him enough to assume he wouldn’t have taken CJ if he’d been available), Royal’s outsize strength for his size, and Shanahan’s opinion that he was the best WR in the draft at getting off the line in press coverage. So I gave the Broncos an A.
Clady was flat-out who we wanted and in retrospect the best choice for us. I had Williams shaded ahead of him but in re-comparing their SN ratings I’ve rethought it. I’ve got three other browsers open in adjacent virtual desktops with SN’s analyses of Jake Long, Ryan Clady, and Chris Williams, the order in which most experts ranked them, although SN actually has it Clady, Williams, and Long. Even if Long is the best of the three, he’s not the best for Denver’s system. His strength is straight-ahead drive blocking, his weakness is mobility and pass protection. In run blocking SN grades him at 8.0, Williams at 8.0, and Clady at 7.5, but both Williams and Clady are better at the kind of blocking Denver’s system demands. In pass blocking Clady ranks 1st, Williams 2nd, and Long 3rd, but their grades are Clady and Williams 8.5, Long 7.0. Since the next person down, Otah, is also 7.0, it suggests that Clady and Williams are head and shoulders above the other OTs in pass blocking. In strength Long grades out at 8.5, ranking 1st, Williams 7.5, ranking 4th, and Clady 7.5, ranking 10th, suggesting there’s not much difference from 4th to 10th in that category. (The 3rd ranking player, Otah, is 8.0.) At this point Williams is slightly ahead. In mobility, however, Clady is 8.5, ranking 2nd, Williams is 7.5, ranking 3rd, and Long is 6.0, ranking 9th and suggesting how relatively unsuited he is for Denver’s system. (Auburn’s Dunlap is 1st, at 8.0, but doesn’t block well on the move.) At this point Clady and Williams are essentially tied. I’ved saved initial quickness for last, because it’s the tie-breaker, and because I think it might be especially significant. Clady is 9.0 and ranks 1st, Williams is 7.5 and 2nd, Long is 7.5 and 7th. The 3rd best guy is too far down in the overall ranking to have a numerical category rating, but Otah at 4th is also 7.5, suggesting that Clady is head and shoulders above all OTs in this category. For reasons given in my post Information Processing Speed I suspect that this category suggests how well a player will adapt to the next level. Even if Clady was middle of the pack in the other categories this ranking might have tabbed him as a potential mid-round sleeper. But he’s not middle of the pack in the other categories. He’s the best tackle in this year’s draft. Period. That’s primarily why I gave the Broncos an A.
Got to get ready for work now. Should have been sleeping during the two hours it took me to write this, but who can sleep on draft weekend?
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Apr 27, 2008 7:28 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






































