2008 NFL Draft -- Denver Selects FB, Peyton Hillis
The final pick in a nine pick draft. KC will get a lot of credit for getting a lot of solid picks in this draft, but what else is to be expected of six picks on day one? Whe it comes right down to it, this pick for Denver is the "Mike Shanahan Approved" stamp that packages up this draft neatly and sends it off to training camp.
Shanny wants nothing more than to score TDs.
He knows he has the most important ingredient for success, a young QB with limitless talent and a drive to be the best. At this point it is all about building around Cutler. From LT to insurance on Henry to arguably the best center in the draft to a dynamic player who can single-handedly improve the Broncos starting field position by leaps and bounds, the Broncos are closer right now to scoring in the red zone than they were in over 25 trips insde the 20 last year.
FB is a bit of a misnomer as recent new member hooper recently pointed out:
Part of Hillis's job will be to protect Cutler.
Hillis is listed as fullback for convenience, but Arkansas played him predominantly as the wingback in a modified Single-Wing offense. That placed him right up with the TE and the strongside tackle on a lot of plays. From that position, his assignments varied widely from play to play; he was expected to block linemen, linebackers, safeties and corners routinely. But a wingback is also used a lot in deception in a Single Wing; Arkansas often used Hillis as a blocking decoy, then a pass receiver in the flat. He also made a good “end-around” candidate; run the play to the strong side and hand the ball off to the wing just as the defense takes its first following step. He’s seen a huge range of play responsibilities and handled them well.
Most importantly, he’ll be a good blocker in the backfield for Cutler as some of the new linemen get on-field experience. I would anticipate more players devoted to QB protection this year than what we’ve seen for this reason.
I’m impressed with Hillis. He was lost in the McFadden-Jones hype, but he was very valuable to their success in college. I think this was a great pickup for Denver.
The blocking can't be overrated after a season where our best backfield blocker was a an undrafted rookie named Selvin Young. And relying on Mike Bell to be an emergency FB? The thought probably gave Shanahan nightmares.
But Hillis is too versatile to be lined up like Lorenzo Neal was in SD. He can catch, even if he isn't going to blaze down the field, and he ran A LOT in short yardage sitations, where he proved he could move the chains with consistency. Add in that he is a one cut back and denver is targeting an ideal player with ideal potential. For once a FB that the offense can build around instead of collapse around.
We got the second best FB in the 2008 draft, and the reasons he wasn't #1 range from durability questions (had fractured vertebrae in his back, though indications are that it has been fixed and healed properly) to being undersized for a prototypical FB. I personally don't worry about injuries cleared by doctors, but the size issue could limit his effectiveness in a lot of situations. While very powerful for a TB, he is only adequately powerful for a FB, and is considered a dreaded 'tweener. He has difficulty maintaining driving blocks in tight quarters, but could address this easily by focusing on his leg drive and just keeping his legs churning ahead. When he starts to lag he can be washed out of the lane, and when carrying the ball there are some questions about his ability to control the ball.
One way or another, Shanahan is removing the question marks around Travis Henry. The line has been upgraded, so the holes should be there. A big back who can take a pounding has been added to share the grief. The closest thing to a true FB that Shanny will allow himself has been added to keep Henry clean in the lane and gobble up the LB. If Henry fails to live up to his end of the deal this year, there won't be a whole lot of other places to put the blame.
1 recs |
9
comments
| Add your comment
Read Related
Comments
Aw, gawrsh
Something I didn’t think about until this morning (and reading your point on the prior injuries) is that Hillis will likely follow the path of most Denver RBs – spend a couple years in the system and be used as trade bait for a proven player or draft picks. He fell very far because of the injury question, but a year or two of solid performance should make him very attractive to several teams in the league.
He definitely has some development to do, but I thought he was a great talent for the last pick.
by hooper on
Apr 28, 2008 5:49 AM MDT
reply
0 recs
Absolutely
the second best fullback with your last pick in the seventh round? Between Hillis and Barret it is a hard to imagine a more intriguing, and possibly exciting 7th round…
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by styg50 on
Apr 28, 2008 6:10 AM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
I think at 240 pounds that Hillis can easily bulk up out of
the dreaded “tweener” zone. His versatility is what excites me. We need a Howard Griffith type of full back that can catch a ball in the flat and take it for a big bruising gain. Plus he runs hard up the middle…harder than any back we currently have.
I think we scored a good one in Hillis(if he stays healthy). :)
by Zappa on
Apr 28, 2008 8:25 AM MDT
reply
0 recs
More on Hillis
I think Henry did a great job before he was injured. Heck, he was leading the league. Now with what is perhaps a real runblocker at FB (and not the hybrids we use), Henry should jump up to the next level.
K-Lich will learn behind Nalen (who I think retires at the end of this year) and Wiegmann (who retires soon after that), and Clady seems ready to jump in. We also got another RB who seems to be a bruiser. It looks like we have the makings of a terrific running game this year nd well into the future.
I hope Hillis is a part of all this. He may be better protection for Cutler (he’ll be an immediate upgrade in pass blocking over the RB hybrids we’ve used at FB) along with our OL upgrades, but I’m also looking forward to the run blocking he’ll provide us with. If he’s very tough, he’ll be an excellent option for “must have” 1 yard dive plays too.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Apr 28, 2008 8:48 AM MDT
reply
0 recs
H Back?
For some reason I have a hard time seeing Shanny lining us up in a single wing. Will we use Hillis as sort of a modfied H Back?
Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of our own mind. - Emerson
by firstfan on
Apr 28, 2008 1:52 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
No no no
Ellis will line up as a FB. As is common with big FBs, he may be used in short yardage on a dive play to pick up what should be a “sure” 1st down. And you are correct, no way that Denver goes single wing. Ellis should primarily be a blocker. I picture Hillis in a standard “I” formation or even an offset strong or weak “I”. Nothing fancy. He’ll line up in front of (or slightly in front and offset from) the HB and block for the most part.
The only thing that I think makes him interesting in terms of his relationship to classic systems (original football) is that with his ability to catch, block, and run the ball (he is versatile) he would be able to motion into position as a blocking TE or stand his ground while a TE motions to the backfield for a heavy run look. Don’t look for either event though, as that is getting “too” cute. However, I’ll bet that we continue to see occassional 3 TE sets during the season, as well as the same from PITT and NE.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Apr 28, 2008 3:12 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
I see!! Thank you.
It is fun to imagine Hillis bulked up from his current 240 clearing the way for Henry. If I haven’t completely flunked out of Mile High University I think this might result in a SAF trying to stop Henry with a full head of steam. That could be pretty punishing.
I wish my pic was as good as broncofanstuckinsd
by firstfan on
Apr 28, 2008 5:55 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Too small for fullback?
Well, after a year of Sapp (229#) and Bell (225#), I’ll take Hillis’ 240.
by AZDynamics on
Apr 28, 2008 6:04 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
I didn't mean to imply that Denver would use a single wing.
(general FYI)
However, Hillis’s single-wingish training gives him some unique situational experiences that could be very useful to Denver. And having said the post subject, I wouldn’t be entirely surprised to see him lined up as a wingback. It’d surprise defenses and give some possibilities for mismatches and situational advantages. But primarily he should fit in nicely as a blocker and fullback.
Maybe he’ll also be able to cue the Denver D on all of McFadden’s “tells” and tendencies. ;)
by hooper on
Apr 28, 2008 7:48 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
















