2008 NFL Draft - Quick Thoughts
Random thoughts from the weekend.
I watched almost the entire draft. It's harder to watch the draft buzzer to buzzer than it is not to. I really liked the 10 minute clock switch this year. More than in years past, I felt like I had an idea when a team was scrambling to make a trade, come to a consensus on one guy, or when they knew exactly who they wanted.
On that note, Denver got their man at pick 12. You had to feel good that Denver was able to pick their top guy of everyone that they could have hoped would be available. Clady, Williams, Albert, Stewart, and Mendenhall were all available at 12. Denver did their homework on this pick, and they seemed to pick fairly quickly, which tells me that they had no second thoughts about Ryan Clady. Anytime Coach Shanahan tells the media he's starting a rookie offensive lineman the same day he drafted him and guaranteed him $11 Million dollars, it's obvious that this is the most confident he's been about a #1 pick for a very long time.
In round 2, I'd be lying if I said that I thought we'd take Royal over DeSean Jackson. I think that Royal is less of a risk than Jackson and can contribute as a slot WR more immediately than Jackson. However, Jackson was absolutely electric at Cal, although he wasn't the best WR on the Cal roster, just the best return man. Jackson's slight build is so unattractive from an injury and getting a clean release perspective. From what I've read, Royal was the best WR in the draft at getting off of the jam at the line. He's a very strong guy, and it seems to me that getting a clean release is a huge deal for Denver, especially considering that it's not Brandon Marshall's strength.
I thought there were some huge gambles in day 1, too. The Rams passing up Dorsey and trade offers from Atlanta were nuts. Dorsey was #1 on thier board. They took Long, even though Dorsey was available. What? Why did they even have a board? Color me clueless on that one. They also needed to take a quarterback. Not only did they pass on Henne, but they should have take a flier on John David Booty, who fits their system. Had to be disappointing for their fans.
I thought the whole "Brandon Albert flying up draft charts" thing would have scared me off. I'd never take a guy who was relatively unknown to most fans outside of UVA and then shot up draft boards after a great combine.
If Denver takes DeSean Jackson, local and national media gives them an A for day one. They took Royal, and I think most would give Denver a B or C. It's pathetic that if an NFL team takes big name college guys, their draft is considered a success: ie the Chiefs.
Todd McShay is a tool. He actually said "War: Me" at one point. I though I hated Kiper until I saw McShay argue with Kiper. They are like two kids battling for affection. Both are ridiculous.
Detroit traded way too much for Kevin Smith. I loved Kevin Smith, but Detroit basically took him with the last pick in the 2nd round. Matt Millen continues to kill me. I thought they could have gotten him later in Round 3, but who knows, maybe someone else wnated him just as bad. I guess I subscribe to taking RB's later in the draft.
Jerry Jones is crazy. Parcells built a team around grit and guts. Jones is turning into Al Davis. He's a sucker for flashy ability. He could (should) have taken Mendenhall. He said that their deal breaker was that, as a backup, Mendenhall's work ethic suffered and he didn't 'flip the switch' until he became a starter. Obviously Felix Jones performed well as a backup, so he was their guy. How can you draft a BACKUP Runningback with your first pick!? Horrible logic. That shows me that he thinks Dallas wasn't any players away from a Super Bowl. This is me disagreeing.
The Jets don't like Kellen Clemens or Chad Pennington. Neither do I.
The Pats reached on multiple picks. Aside from Mayo from Tennessee, I thought their draft was below average.
The Colts didn't get anyone who's going to make an impact for at least a year or two. If I'm a Colts fan, I'm disappointed they didn't get a kick returner or DE who can bring some speed and depth behind Freeney to the turf there.
The Chargers waited too long to address their RT needs. They took a guy in the 7th round, but they're an injury away from reshuffling their team's biggest strength.
The Browns had a great 'under the radar' draft. Did anyone notice that they traded in front of the Broncos in the 4th round and nabbed the player that Denver wanted? In round 4, Cleveland got Oakland to trade with them 4 picks in front of Denver and took Beau Bell. My guess is that Cleveland knew (or thought they knew) that Denver had him in their sights. It happened again later in the 4th round. I thought Denver was eyeing Dre Moore, and then suddenly 4 picks before Denver's pick, Philly traded their pick to Tampa. I knew they'd take Moore, and sure enough, they did. Denver had a good 4th round, but I don't think it was what they thought it would be.
I loved Denver's 7th round. For what it's worth, Kiper had Joshua Barrett listed as the #3 safety in the draft and Hillis as the #2 Fullback in the draft. They're both a steal in round 7. If Barrett (big if) can stay healthy, he could be a great player and future defensive star in Denver.
Spencer Larsen seems like a guy the Pats would take. He's versatile, the leader of the defense, and willing to do anything to make a play. He was all Pac 10 and I'm shocked that he wasn't drafted higher. I saw that he might get some reps at fullback. Sound like Mike Vrabel 2.0 to me.
Do you think that Denver finally realized that they needed a power back to get red-zone yards? I think so. Denver took one of the best 'between the tackes' runners in the draft with Ryan Torain. He's a Jamal Lewis/Mike Anderson type. He doesn't do anything pretty and I think that'll work great in the red-zone.
Denver will have better depth when Tom Nalen retires or Hamilton has to hang 'em up, now they are two-deep behind him with Lichtensteiger and Casey Weigmann. It looks like they can each play gurad too. Smart move by Denver.
I don't know a ton about Carlton Powell, but from what I've seen and read, it looks like he's a great run stopper and plays with a great mean streak. He's not a Warren Sapp/get to the QB type, but he's a tough guy who can hold his ground and gobble up a Center and a Guard on any given play. He's much needed depth with tons of experience at DT. He started (38 games) at V-Tech for close to his entire career there. That's more experience than just about any other DT on the market.
Jack Williams is a Darrent Williams clone. He has good experience and a very competitive streak. He's a burner. He can return kicks too. I think he's an eventual starter. It sound like if he was 2 inches taller, he'd have been a 1st day pick. He could potentially be a 1st year player in specialty secondary packages.
All in all, I'm very happy with Denver's draft. At every need position, they filled their need with upside, versatility, and potential. They aren't gonna hit .1000 on everyone they took, but if 5 or 6 of the players Denver selected in this draft end up starting inside 2 years, which I think is probable, Denver has done a great job being conservative and looking for versatile talent.
immediate playing time: Clady (starter), Royal (returner), Torain (short yardage, special teams), WIlliams (dime, special teams)
9 recs |
48
comments
| Add your comment
Read Related
Comments
Nice post
Nice post. It’s clear you put a lot of thought into watching the draft the past two days. I recommended it.
"I wouldn't ever set out to hurt anyone deliberately unless it was, you know, important --like a league game or something." DICK BUTKUS
by TedBartlett905 on
Apr 28, 2008 1:38 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
Great Stuff...
Carlton Powell sounds like a straight up dude. I think he’ll take up 35% of Robertson’s positional playing time this season. ;) The J-E-T-S can kiss our third rounder good bye next year. :)
by Zappa on
Apr 28, 2008 2:03 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
You've got it
Exactly right, zap. The Broncos will be VERY cognizant of that mark all season. The only question is whether they have the number of DT’s needed to do it. The only other viable DT’s on the roster beside Robertson and Thomas are McKinley and Harris. They must feel pretty good about Harris.
Or so I'm told.
by MN Bronco on
Apr 28, 2008 2:14 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
I have said in the past that....
Jerry Jones is Al Davis with a smile.
fader nation is a conquered nation
by mdierk on
Apr 28, 2008 2:06 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
Eeww!
That is a pair of pretty disgusting dudes!
Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of our own mind. - Emerson
by firstfan on
Apr 28, 2008 2:14 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
I was hoping that
we’d draft a guy with a mustache. You know, the Craig-Wheelihan-gun-slinging-type. There is always next year.
by mrgoodbarker on
Apr 28, 2008 2:33 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
Agreed
I didn’t see many players that were really bringing a slack-jawed wispy moustache to the table, but of all of Denver’s prospects they picked up, I think our new center has the chops to pull off a Craig Wheelihan “white trash moustache” off.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/kory-lichtensteiger?id=274
Broncos also signed Polumbus today from CU, btw
by super7 on
Apr 28, 2008 2:43 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Wishes, Dreams, Wants and Needs
I was hoping we would draft someone with an “arm bar” tattoo or their own name tat’s down the back of their arm. Turns out Pears are already has that position filled. I just hope we never again have to hear the words “Holding, Number 50.” Hamilton makes me want to punch my TV sometimes. Most times.
by Ketchup N Husstard on
Apr 28, 2008 3:05 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
K&H, you are right..I was so happy that...
We didn’t take that Owen Schmitt guy. 
He reminds me of old-school Darren Drozdov, the nose tackle that used to throw up on the o-line.
by super7 on
Apr 28, 2008 3:13 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
didn't he break his neck....
while pro wrestling?
fader nation is a conquered nation
by mdierk on
Apr 28, 2008 4:02 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Seen the new Viking lately?

Or so I'm told.
by MN Bronco on
Apr 29, 2008 1:42 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Are you thinking handle bars?
I agree that facial hair is VASTLY underrated! I was a fan of Jake’s Mountain Man beard, and his porn ‘stache was hilarious (I firmly believe that he grew it just for picture day, then took it off!)
The Fu-Manchu needs to have a presence on the team…and if someone could pull off the whole “aged kung fu master 3’ beard”, said player should be going to the Pro Bowl every year.
~Uffdah
by Disco_Stu on
Apr 28, 2008 3:09 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
I'm reading that Shanahan
says that his top two targets fell to him (Clady and Royal), and that this is the first time he’s gotten both in one draft. He thought there was a good chance that neither Clady or Royal would fall to them. That’s an endorsement if I ever heard one! I also agree the 7th rounders were both steals. I’m reading some boards having Hillis as #1, not two, and even a board that had Clady as #1 (amongst OTs).
Great write up!
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Apr 28, 2008 2:53 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
Agree, HT
Shanny’s glowing about these guys. He’s usually poker faced about this kind of stuff until mini-camp. Keeping in mind that this is his first draft without Sundquist in a long time, I think he genuinely got who he wanted, especially at the front of the draft.
by super7 on
Apr 28, 2008 2:58 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
I brought this up
in Darin H’s (now-legendary) post as something I’m still trying to wrap my head around: did Sundquist really hold more power than any of us gave him credit for? This draft felt so much different than previous ones, and Shanahan is two steps away from giggling like a school girl (creepy)...was Sundquist the one who liked to take flyers on character-concerns, and this draft was the backlash reaction from Shanahan? Or did Shanahan just have a huge change of philosophy over last year, and decided to “clean house” and make a fresh start?
I just don’t know…but I can’t imagine that the firing of Sundquist and the change in draft philosophy was purely coincidental…
~Uffdah
by Disco_Stu on
Apr 28, 2008 3:07 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
My take
I don’t think it’s a matter of power so much because it’s well known Shanny has the final authority. I believe it is more that Shanahan will listen to the input of those he has entrusted to certain responsibilities. This is the big area where I see the media as missing it. There is FAR too much for one person to do everything in pro football. Shanahan delegates to his people and expects them to come through. In the past, I think he listened to Sundquist and others and made the final decision after weighing all arguments. This year, without Sundquist, the arguments were markedly different so the end result was different.
We’ll see how it pans out.
Or so I'm told.
by MN Bronco on
Apr 28, 2008 3:42 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
MN, I think that you're right...
for the most part. Shanny doesn’t do it all, but there’s not as much of a “bipartisan” system as it has in years past.
Shanny can’t be looked at as “the one who was wrong (or right)” any more. With Sundquist there, there was another party with a potentailly differing opinion. For that reason, there are guys that ultimately Sudquist was a big proponent of that either did or din’t work out. This year, that wasn’t the case.
by super7 on
Apr 28, 2008 3:50 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
I now wonder if Sundquist was the mastermind behind
all the wheeling and dealing the past couple of drafts…
by Zappa on
Apr 28, 2008 8:57 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
I would like to know
but I doubt we ever will. Neither Sundquist nor Shanny will ever say. We do know that Shanny isn’t afraid to go all in. He obviously knew the key to success for Bates’ scheme was D line so he spent 3/4 of last year’s draft on D line. I think he realized how bad the character issues had become and this draft speaks for itself. I am excited for this season to begin.
Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of our own mind. - Emerson
by firstfan on
Apr 28, 2008 3:49 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Sundquist was a risk taker
by his own admission. Beyond that I don’t think we will ever know anything about the dynamic in the warroom, except that Shanny and sundquist weren’t getting along anymore.
I too think thsi draft (and offseason really) had a much different feel to it. There will be a lot of new faces just like last year, but this time, those new faces really feel like Broncos to me!!
Nice sig first fan. :)
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by styg50 on
Apr 28, 2008 6:35 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Kiper
I agree about Kiper. He gave Denver’s draft a C+. What is he talking about? I wonder if he gave the Patriot draft a higher grade. From some of the picks of theirs I saw, that draft wasn’t very good. Jerod Mayo probably won’t be that great, and Terrence Wheatley seems like a Ellis Hobbs clone. They deserve some busts, though. Cheaters never prosper.
by PABroncofan on
Apr 28, 2008 7:09 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
Along with the big-name trap, I think that
there is a trap to not rate a draft based on the team doing the drafting. New England’s picks seem like reaches and ho-hum, but they’re mostly guys who will fit well, fill the (very) few needs they have and have a reasonable expectation to contribute. With that, it really doesn’t matter if they were “reaches” – especially if there was nobody better available at that particular position. It’s not like a team has the luxury of arbitrarily lowering a draft position so they can get their guy at a more “appropriate” position.
Also, I’m a UTennessee guy (so color me biased if you like) and I think that Mayo is a terrific fit for the Patriots. It really stinks, because I grew tired of the Pats long before the videotape stuff and I really didn’t want to see a guy I used to cheer for in person play for them. But he fits their style very well and is a dedicated learner of the game. I’m big on the pick despite the divided loyalty.
It’ll all depend on how the players work out, but I really like the prospects of this draft for the Broncos. There are no absolute head-scratchers or forehead-slappers like the past few years.
by hooper on
Apr 28, 2008 8:37 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
Dorsey
I don’t agree with your opinion that the Rams made a mistake by passing on Dorsey. I do think he was probably the best player in the draft, but the Rams played the 3-4 a lot last year, and Dorsey isn’t a nose tackle. If they were willing to give up any aspirations towards being a 3-4 team, then it would be the right pick, but otherwise it would be a mistake. I do, however, think Atlanta and Oakland made mistakes in passing on him. I was really hoping he’d go to Atlanta since otherwise he’d end up in our division. Oh, well.
by jack_ on
Apr 28, 2008 9:00 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
The Rams should have traded their
pick to Baltimore…the Ravens appeared to be offering nearly their whole draft to move up 6 spots. lol Chris Long isn’t THAT great imho. Maybe he is…we’ll see.
by Zappa on
Apr 28, 2008 10:06 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
super7
i actually met drozdov’s dad, while drozdov was playing in the preseason for denver . he was a gym teacher at atlantic community college here in new jersey. i went to a really good culinary school that was literally attached to it. i thought he would be a little more gracious to meet a bronco fan(and a fan of his son at the time), here in n.j. there aren’t many of us. after meeting him, i soon realized growing up under this guy would make me puke, too. the sargeant at the beginning of “full metal jacket” would be the best description i can think of. this kid probably had all kinds of issues. too bad, because on the field he was a terror-he reminded me of brian bosworth in his first year(i know, we hate him, but he was really good at first), playing like he was shot out of a cannon. i can’t believe anyone remembers this guy besides me. great stuff
by davecheffy on
Apr 29, 2008 12:58 AM MDT
reply
0 recs
Oh my Gosh!
That’s scary. You had to think that they were just a bunch of crazies in that family. He is an “essayis” now. Whatever that means.
by super7 on
Apr 29, 2008 10:03 AM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Fantastic column
Well thought out, and I agree this draft had a different feel. Obviously, none of us know how it will pan out, but I at least like what I’ve learned about our picks. Great job, Super!
by nycbroncosfan on
Apr 29, 2008 8:30 AM MDT
reply
0 recs
thanks nyc!
I hope the Broncos have a different feel this year too. It seems like they just want consistent guys. I loved that most of the guys Denver took were versatile and willing to play wherever.
by super7 on
Apr 29, 2008 10:06 AM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Dorsey
The Rams drafted Carriker last year and so I thought taking Chris Long was a smart decision. They needed the pass rush from the edge. I maybe in the minority but after watching J.D. Booty for the past couple of seasons, I am totally unimpressed with him.
Plus I think Ellis is going to be more of an impact than Dorsey. Again I could be off base here. But Dorsey IMHO took too many plays off. You cant do that in the NFL. He could get away with that in the NCAA. Plus look how teams that could really run the rock like an Arkansas always ran right at him. I dont remember any team doing that to Ellis. Even when Mendenhall had that great game in the Rose Bowl most of his yards came going outside
by broncfanstuckinsd on
Apr 29, 2008 12:55 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
I don't have a problem with the Long decision by the Rams either
I had them going in that direction in the first place, and if they don’t want to move Carriker back outside again after moving him to DT, they can give him a chance for another year. Long could still be a good pass rusher, but this STL team does need A LOT of defensive help in the few years to come. O.J. Atogwe is very nice as a corner though!
by phantom818 on
Apr 29, 2008 1:27 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Chris Long
I have mixed feelings on this guy. He’s the classic “if he wasn’t insert FORMER PLAYER name’s kid, would he be a top 5 pick?” guy.
He has all of the intangibles. Tough guy, great motor, good instincts, smart. I think he warrants a high pick in the draft. But I don’t think he warrants the #2 pick overall.
I don’t think the Lambs are screwed, but they could be in better shape. Long should have a good career and contribute for a long time, but I can’t see him going to 8 straight pro bowls. I could be VERY wrong.
I’ll have my buddy who’s a Lambs fan chime in on this, but he wanted Dorsey all the way.
As far as JDB goes, I don’t blame you, but you can’t go into a season with Green backing up Bulger, who hasn’t been great recently. Honestly, I don’t think Bulger could start for more than 7 or 8 of the teams in the NFL, and they have no youth at QB. JDB seems like a project who understands his reads and is fairly accurate.
by super7 on
Apr 29, 2008 2:14 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Bulger did get sacked 30 some times last season
While he might not have been great recently, STL should at least try to give him a chance to throw…right? It could be even harder now that Bruce is gone…who knows? I do like Steven Jackson though when he’s not injured.
by phantom818 on
Apr 29, 2008 2:45 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
SJ is AWESOME
Jackson is the ideal NFL back right now unless you have LT. Jackson, when healthy, is the one of the 5 best backs in the NFL in my book. I’m always shocked that the Rams don’t just commit to a 5 yards and a could of dust offense and find a few O-line thru the draft and FA. There were plenty of OG’s in FA this year, and they could have traded with the Ravens and taken andy of the “other” OLT’s. In the NFC south, a ball control offense could do wonders!
by super7 on
Apr 29, 2008 2:51 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
YEAHHHHHH
:-D
He certainly helped my fantasy team last season ;-)
Because of him and the departure of Mike Martz, the Rams are definitely gravitating towards running the ball. However, last season was a shame, because due to SJax’s injury and the team falling behind early, there wasn’t much chance to cash-in on the running game.
by phantom818 on
Apr 29, 2008 3:02 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Rams Thoughts
Okay…. I know the Lambs had Dorsey #1 on their board. And during “hot dog friday” I revealed to Super 7 that Dorsey is my choice. I really do think the Rams had Dorsey as #1a, Long#1b. The Rams drafted for need, pure and simple. Their greatest need is a DE, not DT. I am certainly not going to blast them in drafting for need. But I do think Dorsey has the greater upside to be a impact and special player, mainly why I wanted him #1. And looking back at the Rams draft, they did not draft any additional D-linemen…. which was shocking to me. Looks like Carriker is up to 315 and is staying inside. I thought they would go after a DT at some point…
I also don’t blame them for not trading down…. the Jets called about Long but didn’t have enough ammo. The Ravens gave them a solid package to drop down to 8. But when it was all said and done they didn’t feel like they would get they same type of player at 8 and even with the additonal picks, I agree. Plus, do not underestimate this pick as a marketing tool for the Rams. Attendance lagged last year… don’t think for a minute that Long was drafted for as much as the player as it was also for the marketing strategy. St. Louis, the city, LOVES “scrappy” white guys….
I do disagree with Super 7 on Marq Bulger. I think the Rams are fine with Trent “ice cream headache” Green at #2. Sure, the Rams are old at QB, but look at some of the #2 QB’s in the league… Kellen Clemens? Jim Sorgi? Spurgeon Wynn? Ryan Fitzpatrick? Tim Rattay? Seriously, the Rams have more pressing needs than a #2 QB, and I do believe Mr. Green got clearance to play if needed. Why waste a 5th on Dennis Dixon or a mormon from Tennessee? The OL injuries were a fluke. 80% of the line was banged up for multiple games in the 1st month. 3 starters out for the season at the bye. I have to think they will recover this year. I love the John Greco pick in the 3rd… can play RT and both Guard positions. And the Guard from Ore St in the 5th looks to be a solid depth pick as well.
I thought I’d see you all blast the Rams for taking Donnie Avery as the 1st overall WR? He’s a bigger and faster Desean Jackson, without the baggage. I guess the Martz and the Niners wanted him 5 picks later and was a fast mover on most boards after the combine. I like the pick as there were no clear cut stud WR’s from 1-10 this year. If they had him #1, why the F not?
Terry-o OUT!!!
by Lambs Fan on
Apr 29, 2008 3:16 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
hilarious, lamb kebab
I know what you’re syaing, they’re sticking w/ their plan. My opinion is that StL needs to focus on Run D and Run Offense. Bulger’s fine for that and eventually, they can find his heir. They may be doing this right now though, and if the O-Line was as banged up as it sounds like they were, maybe they’ll have a good shot in a year or two at competeing for the NFC crown. If that’s the case, and they are for sure keeping Carriker at DT, then Long probably was a great choice.
by super7 on
Apr 29, 2008 3:27 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
new
I am new to this. Yesterday I learned how to make a comment and that blog is the right word. I have so enjoyed the kind way you people behave and the writings in this place that I am tempted to try a blog. How do I do this?
by Mike Clark on
Apr 29, 2008 6:48 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
Do you mean your own website blog or MHR blog? :)
To do an MHR blog is easy, you start a FanPost.
To do your own website blog, I would suggest using Blogger at www.blogger.com
by Zappa on
Apr 29, 2008 6:59 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
If you're looking to make a "Blog" on Mile High Report
There’s a link for “New FanPost” near the top of the page (right under the Roster tap.) Click on that, and let us know what you have to say!
Mile High Report is the Blog, so the FanPosts are, effectively, Blog posts. Don’t get too hung up on the terminology…it all serves the same purpose. :o)
~Uffdah
by Disco_Stu on
Apr 29, 2008 7:02 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
And if you need any help and get stuck...
...please feel free to e-mail any of the editors. On the main page look at the panels on the right and scroll down. You’ll see the staff listings there. Click on a name (that hoosierteacher guy is a big helper) and get the e-mail address for that person. We’re here to help and to make your MileHigh Report experience as easy and as enjoyable as possible.
I’ll be starting a series soon on assisting members with using the tools found at MHR. More on that soon…
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Apr 29, 2008 8:42 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Yea, HT's the dude to call...
He is better at teaching than I…unless your used to being instructed like this:
“See that thingie up at the top, click on it. Then when the whatchamacallit pops up, start typing in stuff you want to say, then click the other thingamajig and you are good to go!!”
I’m just being dorky again, but definitely hit styg, HT, me, or pretty much anyone else that posts here for how to’s within the site. You’ll find everyone here quite friendly…I guess thats what happens when everyone on the site are of the same Bronco clan. ;)
by Zappa on
Apr 29, 2008 10:08 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
The ironic thing...
Of all the editors and contributors, I have the least tech knowledge. Guru works in the industry, and Styg has an engineer’s grasp of IT/IS knowledge. You of course are one of those young guys that grew up with these computer things! : ) But I’m still the guy that seems to have fallen into doing a lot of the MHR Tech Tips section stories that you’ll see coming up. This is good tough. With a teaching background I feel I can help, and it also gives me a good opportunity to learn (since I need to learn the material well enough to turn around and pass it on).
I’m pretty comfortable with just about all of the features at MHR 2.0, and the ones I’m not up on I’ll be learning with the crowd.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Apr 30, 2008 10:32 AM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
That is why you are the perfect teacher
You understand where the “average joe” is coming from. If you let any of the techies (and I am one by trade as well) try to explain things, they skip over things they assume everybody knows and they dive into pointless details that only other techies find interesting.
by MattR on
Apr 30, 2008 3:34 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
I am the same age as styg. :P
But I get what your sayin’. My dirty little secret is that I steal Styg’s code regularly and use it to make my articles look better. ;)
I still have a ways to go, but as long as I steadily improve then I don’t worry about my shortcomings.
by Zappa on
Apr 30, 2008 4:14 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs













