The Quest: One Fan's Thoughts
I have to admit, when Guru coined the phrase "The Quest " to christen the Bronco's 2008 season, a shiver of anticipation thrilled through me.
In so many words, I had been trying, somewhat unsuccessfully, to frame my outlook for the 2008 season. I knew it involved great anticipation (doesn't it always?); I knew it involved the shaking of some all too mortal coil (call it character concerns, bad drafting, whatever.); I knew too that its importance tugged at my very soul, and yet its identity eluded me.
Enter Guru and "The Quest," and it seemed like something had fallen into place. But what?
The Broncos have added 36 new faces to the roster and those guys need to get to know each other a bit. For the MHR, it means time to get serious about covering the team on a day-to-day basis. I have officially termed the 2008 season as "The Quest". It is both direct and to the point, as well as general, enigmatic. I have purposfully left off what "The Quest" is for.
I leave that to you.
What Guru left me with, what he left ALL of us with, was a question: What is the Quest for?
Principles
So I answered "Super Bowl" on the poll. Easy enough to do.
I say that, because whenever I am faced with a sweeping generalization, or with an enigmatic idea, I resort to principles. In NFL football, the most explicit symbol of success is to win the SuperBowl, I want the Broncos to be successful, so... the Bronco's should set out to win the SuperBowl. It didn't occur to me to be realistic, or even to think that the SuperBowl wasn't realistic. I simply voted for the what I esteemed to be the loftiest goal in the poll, on the principle that one should always strive for the best.
But even having cast the vote, my decision felt unsettled. Was I wrong? Was I resorting to an 'emotional', baseless vote? I searched the comments looking for clues, and found only more questions. Now, I know that life is full of choices, but I firmly believe that integrating your observations, your experiences and your knowledge into abstract ideas, i.e. into principles, is not one of them: it is fundamentally, mortally necessary. If their is choice involved in the process, it is only the choice between principles that are right, or principles that are wrong. And there is only one standard to measure them against: reality.
So I guess you could say that it was time to get real.
I asked myself, If one must strive to be the best, does this mean that in the NFL one must strive to win the SuperBowl? It makes a lot of sense, and the pressure of being any of 31 teams to be considered failures to one degree or another is certainly high drama. But I know that isn't how it works. Injuries are a commonplace devestator of teams and are rarely a moral appraisal of a man, and as much satisfaction can be derived from becoming better as for being the best. Many Broncos fans are happy with divisional wins, whether its against San Diego under the guidance of Rivers, the Chiefs at Arrowhead, or the raiders anytime, anyplace. A lot of us have breathed sighs of relief just because the Broncos seem to be on the right track in free agency and the draft.
Well, I was still confused about what to make of "The Quest", but I knew two pieces of the puzzle were in place: I felt like the Broncos have already made significant strides in becoming better. But I also felt like there was still unfinished business. No, that is not quite right. I felt like there was still a missing "something."
And for the life of me, I couldn't get my mind off of a seemingly arbitrary, almost insignificant concept, which has been haunting me for the last two years and comes up every time I try to get this mess figured out:
Points.
Productivity
There is one very simple, very concrete thing which I want the Broncos to acquire this year. No amount of money will buy it in free agency. No number of bad years will earn a ticket to be first in line for it. A teams worth of coaches and players has to earn it, game by game, drive by drive, play by play.
I want points.
Specifically, I want this team to start scoring TDs in the redzone. This has been the ultimate symptom, and indictment, of the Bronco's struggles as a team. The defense needs to get better field position for the offense, the offense needs to maintain its level of determination, and the special teams needs to help put both sides in a better position to do their job. But this doesn't come cheap.
This is the virtue of productivity. It is a process of taking control of your own destiny, your own existence, and it is a constant process, both in life and on the football field. I don't want to get excited about a game because the team captains have said that the team really had a great practice. They are supposed to have great practices, this shouldn't be news, nor should it be rare or special. Remember, it is a constant process, the end of one game is the begining of the next. Unfortuanately, the only clue we as fans will have that they are exercising productivity through the week, is the results they display on gameday, which are subject to a whole host of contingencies and modifiers, from injuries to blown calls.
The more I think about this missing "something", the more The Quest comes into focus for me. The questions are getting answered and the clues are piling up. The Broncos have inconsistent practices because of a missing "something." The Broncos have lackluster games because of a missing "something." The Broncos have unfinished drives because of a missing "something."
Producing points is only the result of obtaining, of harnessing the power of this elusive "something". It is something to point to, as an indication of success or failure, and it is possible that striving to specifically finish off drives and earn points might somehow lead to a retroactive discovery of what is actually missing, but it could also result in further disappointment and disillusionment if it fails. The Broncos need this "something" and they need it now, before they just aren't Broncos anymore. I know this may seem like a horrible thing to say, that somehow the Broncos could not be the Broncos, but look at some of the disenfranchised fans around the league who are left to wait out the tenures of owners, coaches and players who represent what they despise. Look at their evasions, their contradictions, the falsehoods and pretenses under which their fanhood survives, and you will know that pity is one of the worst feelings one human being can feel for another. The Broncos are not immune to this, but they and their fans are highly resistant, like many fanbases throughout the NFL. But you can't fight what you can't identify, and the erosion of core values that we have seen over the past few years is an erosion that can devestate the greatest monuments with enough time.
It is high time that we pin down this missing "something" and I think that I just might know what it is. To paraphrase Victor Hugo:
"There is a spectacle greater than a football play, and it is the game itself. But there is a spectacle greater even than the game, and it is the interior of a player's soul."
Pride
It isn't a magic word. You don't utter it and create something from thin air. It doesn't call or conjure anything except to the imagination, because it is just a word. But as an idea, it is very powerful.
I am not speaking here of the petty vanities of prima donna wider receivers or chronically injured tailbacks. Nor am I speaking of the ponderous boasting of a self absorbed oaf. I am speaking of the quiet, confident recognition that you are your own highest value, and like all values, this recognition is something you must earn. Aristotle called Pride the "crown of all the virtues."
Just as a player must produce values on the field to sustain a drive, so he must acquire the values of character that make drives worth sustaining. Pride is part of an equation involving and presupposing all virtues--it speaks of a code where virtues are worth practicing, values are worth acheiving and that YOU are worthy of both. In a player this will manifest most noticeably as a shudder of contempt and rebellion against any possibility of failure. They will find ways to score, hold an opponent and earn their chances. Even in loss they are filled with the radiant surety that they should have been the winners and that next time they will be. In victory such souls are exalted. In defeat they burn with undeniable passion.
Pride is recognition that of all the achievements open to you, the one that makes all others possible is the formation of your own moral character, that just as you must earn your wealth, you must earn your soul. But it does not operate in the presence of its antithesis: fear and guilt. A player who fears his mistakes will never be able to put forth the immovable presence that stops an opponent in their tracks. A fan that fears his team's failure will never be able to present the indomitable will that carries the team through the exhausting work of the pursuit of greatness. The fear comes from abandoning that which is your only hope, the rational actions that could help the team in any small or large way. The guilt comes from knowing that it was you who made that choice, and no one else.
MHR has given me hope for the fans, and hope for The Quest. There is a delicate balance between the fans and the team, we feed off of them and they feed off of us. That means there is something that we can do. Zappa will be one of the lone bright spots in the darkness of oakland on Monday Night Football, and the Broncos will be sure to notice. Hoosierteacher strips himself bare to give us every piece of knowledge he can. Guru puts more time into creating and maintaining this community than seems humanly possible given the paltry number of hours there are in a day.
What we don't know, we will help to find out, and every discovery at MHR creates more of the most enlightened, fanatical and , hopefully, PROUD sports fans in the NFL.
The Quest has begun, and this time, its not all on the Broncos, and nothing is automatic. This isn't a trip to the grocery store: there is no guarantee that we are going to make it. But pride in this team won't come without pride in ourselves, so lets keep up the great work, stick together and not hold anything back.
Because we are all on the same adventure.
7 recs |
62 comments
Comments
WOW!!!
We are some tremendously blessed fans, to have such a large group of insightful dedicated & eloquent contributors on this site! So often I am treated to a new vision of Broncomania, what it is & what it can be, that I am absolutely blown away! Thank you ALL for your posts, comments & incredible knowledge!!! Great addition Styg, to a tremendous article & question by Guru! I believe you hit the nail on the head in a more precise way than I when, (in an earlier post), I said “want to” & “heart”. Thank you for putting it much better than I did!!!!
by Pmac54 on May 23, 2008 12:49 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I appreciate the comment
You said “want to” and “heart”, and another comment, from Jim Goodman, that stuck with me, was when he was talking about scouting players and he noted that the hardest things to scout is “drive to be the best”.
All different ways of looking at the same phenomenon I think: beings of self-made souls.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on May 24, 2008 12:36 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Styg,
Firstly, Epic post man. Epic.
I too have been thinking about “The Quest” and am working on something but you beat me to the punch. I got all weekend to think and write about it, since I’ll be in Lake Tahoe starting tonight enjoying some R&R after a weekend of shootin’ and drinkin’. ;)
If you don’t mind, I think I viewed The Quest differently and in more of a goal achieving Quest which I intend post about next week, but you really hit the nail on the head with the standard bearers of Bronco football. We have lost something…I hope this is the season we get it back.
PS Add “The Quest” tag to this story…like Guru did on his. Anyone else who writes about “The Quest” do the same, because I have a feeling we are going to want to revisit these discussions some time down the road. Call it a gut feeling. ;)
If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
MHR's Bronco History
by Tim Lynch on May 23, 2008 12:51 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I see the tag
has been added, so thanks to whoever took care of that.
I hope this is the season that we get it back too, and good catch noting that despite our advancements in many areas, this isn’t something that we can sign or draft.
Character is a great thing to scout for as far as bringing a free agent onto the team because it is one of the most obvious indicators that a player has the pride I am talking about. But something I didn’t really mention in the article is that this team can work together to ressurect the entire team’s pride in their work. Think of it as “Bronco’s Pride”. It was something that existed in all facets of the team for a while and really came together under the Shanny-Elway era to bear superbowl fruit, but it has been awhile since it was a teamwide phenomenon. It has been in the hearts of individual players here and there, but consistently drowned out by the lesser wills. We have definitely harvested a bumper crop of the right kind of vessels for this spirit this year, between our free agents and our rookies. Now we just have to fill them to the brim.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on May 24, 2008 12:43 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent Styg
What great write up. I think we follow general lines in our vision of the Quest. I hope that we get a treat and get that coveted super bowl ring this year but hey I could live without it this year knowing it is coming in the next few
Until Terrell Davis makes it into the Hall of Fame, I refuse to acknowledge the existence of such a place other than the Ring of Fame at Mile High!
Davis to the Hall!
by Jon Tollerud on May 23, 2008 12:55 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Super Bowl is the Quest of Quests,
but a team needs that swager, that attitude, and that maturity to become World Champions. I’m willing to give this team a year to get to know each other and start to gel. I still think they go 13-3 and lose in the playoffs, but if Guru is right and I am wrong then this team might end up going 8-8 and next year would be the year they take off. Be wrong Guru! Be Wrong! lol
If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
MHR's Bronco History
by Tim Lynch on May 23, 2008 12:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I sure hope
the gellin’ takes less than a year! I’m no coach, but I think if the level of competition in camp is high enough, then the “survivors” that make the team should be pretty close. Unlike the past two years when anybody seemed to be able to make the team, one of the best things this offseason has done is create the kind of depth that should make it a PRIVELEGE if someone makes the team, instead of attrition.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on May 24, 2008 12:58 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
the Quest
To is always about the Super Bowl. I do agree with the points of the post. But I think that with the hunger and drive of the leaders on down should make this a better team than last year. I do believe they will get that swagger back and dominate again, especially at home. One of my reasons is that Clady is a beast with a mean streak that has been missing for about 2 years or so. I also believe that is infectious for the Broncos. The running game will dominate again and JC will show he was the best QB of 2006.
Plus with the NFL the way it is anymore, its not out of the realm of possibilty that Denver cant win the super bowl this year.
by broncfanstuckinsd on May 23, 2008 1:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point on Clady and the leaders
there is no doubt that “Bronco Pride” will more closely resemble a raging fire than tide of change.
The change that is wrought will start from the embers that burn within only a few players, but unlike the past few years, instead of stocking the team with the equivalent of wet mud, Shanny and Co. have loaded up on the bone dry tinder of players with drive, dedication, and something to prove. There is no wood so incendiary as the chip off a man’s shoulder.
I suppose there is always hope that when you sign new rookies and free agents you might acquire that special player who can light a fire under others (lynch?). But I think the best strategy is to bring in players who make good tinder and will burn if that fire gets lit under them.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on May 24, 2008 1:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm hoping for the same treat, Jon
and thanks for the compliment. I would be remiss if I didn’t note that even if the SuperBowl doesn’t actually ever get realized, the real goal is to be a SuperBowl worthy team, and for them and us to know and believe that. And not in a “fan” type of way, but to really feel like you are supporting a winner.
When you know in your heart that you are good and worthy, that is an untouchable part of you. The Broncos DO NOT have that yet. Even Shanny seems to feel the weight of self-doubt, in the way he fell on his sword last year, though that can be explained many ways. Like Guru said, the first step is for this group of guys, with the 36 new faces, to create a fraternity of values so that they can move forward in the coming season and the seasons that follow without having so much goldarned turnover!!
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on May 24, 2008 12:54 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
WOW is right
Styg you use the English language like a fine craftsman uses his tools. Thank you.
I too have been mulling over The Quest and many of my thoughts and emotions were captured in this post. I can’t put it into words like you, but the addition of character guys who play hard all the time has really been big for me. The three Ps are the outward manifestation of that hard-nosed, character player that is the Denver Bronco. Great post, thanks again.
Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of our own mind. - Emerson
by firstfan on May 23, 2008 1:03 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, firstfan
your use of “hard-nosed” and Guru’s description of the missing bad-assery are a reminder that of the many manifestations of this kind of Pride, the one that is the most congruent to the BATTLE that is football has to be the steel-eyed determination to
TAKE what belongs to you
and to NEVER give an inch.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on May 24, 2008 1:13 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well thanks for addressing the generalized quest
Denver is on a great “Quest”
For what?
Oh, I don’t know, I just like saying that because it makes me feel good about the team.
:)
Great post.
by phantom818 on May 23, 2008 1:10 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Great post!
I have a comment:
Was I resorting to an ‘emotional’, baseless vote?
Actually, i think you were. You fully make up for it in this magnificent post, but woting for “Super Bowl” is worthless and i honestly don’t hope that Shanahan or Bowlen would vote “Super Bowl” if asked. To prove this, take a look at two of our most hated rivals:
If i remember correctly one were able to vote “respectability” or something like that. That is what the kansas city organisation would vote. They have seen the writing on the wall: They cannot win a SB this year or the next three years for that matter. Therefore they have basically thrown ‘08 out the window in order to have a remote chance in ‘09 and a decent chance in ‘10.
If you turn your head towards the bay area (don’t EVER look directly into it – you will suffer a slow and painfull death.), you will see the complete opposite. Much can be said about Al Davis, but he certainly strives for the best. He does it the wrong way, though. He votes “Super Bowl” every single year, with the only outcome (see my sig, for further proof) that his teams never gets a chance to rewamp. The raiders never gets the effect that kansas (and you have to respect them for this) is hoping to see in ‘09/’10/’11 and maybe a lot further. Davis is allways year to year, never thinking more than next season ahead.
To be honest i didn’t vote. I didn’t know what to vote. I still haven’t figured it out completely, but you cant expect the team to go for the best every year. One of my most beloved principles are, like yours, “You must strive for the best”. But to benefit from that priciple you must have this one by the side: “Be realistic – no use being a dreamer.” The two of them merge into
Set high, but realistic goals
In other words: If you set your goals unrealistically high, you might end up not improving at all – and that, my friend, is the worst thing that can happen!!
Remember: New England won 18 last year; Oakland's won 19 in a half-decade
/The great Dane - formerly known as Claaaaas!
by Claus Vestergaard on May 23, 2008 1:37 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Except
That Shanahan goal is to win the Super Bowl EVERY year. It is not unrealistic in this day and age of the NFL to go from5-11 to the World Champs. Ask the Patriots (2001). Ask yourself would you be more satisfied if the goal was repsectability or a championship. This team was 13-3 just TWO years ago. To Shanahans credit in 2006 he knew he could not win a Super Bowl with who he had at QB, and other positons and devcided to change during the season. They could and maybe should have made the playoffs that year but, fell short. Last year was a rough but an experience building year. 7-9 isnt the best record, however if I do recall, the current World Champions were only 8-8 the tear prior. Do you think their goal was respectabilty??
I would rather shoot for the stars than to hope or pray to get better. Then again Shanahan is not the current Al Davis or Peterson. He gambles but wins a lot more than he loses.
by broncfanstuckinsd on May 23, 2008 2:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ask yourself would you be more satisfied if the goal was repsectability or a championship.
The answer is obvious – you can’t help but to hope for a championship – i do that, everybody do that. I’m not saying that setting your sight on the grand price will be your doom, but i’m just saying it might. I, personally, think that an SB for Denver is unrealistic this year (trust me, i would love for them to prove me wrong). I just think some of you guys get blinded by your love to this franchise.
We now Shanahan goes for the big one every year – he is hones about that, but… When we kick off against oakland monday night week 1, i want him to go for the SB. I want him to think about nothing else but SB. But going for emmediate succes, when a title isn’t realistic, in reloading season, will, in the long run, kill you – again the raiders is the best example.
I’m hoping i’m making mysel clear – having some linguistical problems… :)
Remember: New England won 18 last year; Oakland's won 19 in a half-decade
/The great Dane - formerly known as Claaaaas!
by Claus Vestergaard on May 23, 2008 2:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand your point
But I think there is a HUGE difference between the franchises in Oakland and Denver. For the past 16 years or so Denver has been almost always a contendor. While the Raiders except ro a bried run in from 2000-2002 has been crappy at best. Shanny may take a run at questionable players but usually they have been cap friendly so the Broncos wont be hamstrung. Just look at the players the raiders signed this offseason compared to Denver’s. I think Shanny did a good job and it may turn out to be great. But I do disagree with you stating this is a rebuilding season. If there was on maybe last season. I am sometimes blinded but I am also realistic. While sometimes I feel rankings and little pulls of muscles are overblown in May and June I do think with the ownership the Broncos have and the Head Coach Denver will always be a factor for a title.
by broncfanstuckinsd on May 23, 2008 3:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think what you guys are talking about
is addressed best by HT down below, and by the utterly boring, but true, mantra of players and coaches throughout the season:
One game at a time.
I don’t think shanny plans, plays or coaches for the superbowl, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t his goal. The superbowl is the goal, the playoffs is how you get there, and fielding a consistent team with the dedication and drive week in and week out to perform to the best of their ability is how you make the playoffs. To go back further, the reloading season is how you assemble the team that develops the chemistry that executes to make the playoffs to earn a shot at the superbowl (that Jack built?)...
A metaphor for this would be if you wanted to write a novel. You can’t change the fact that you want to do that, and the novel becomes your goal. But if I sit down and say “I’m going to write a novel” I will get nowhere, because that is a HUGE task, beyond the scope of a human intellect to hold in its awareness at one time. I could never write a 500 page draft that is to become a 300 page novel. But I CAN write 5 pages a day. If I write enough 5 pages a day, eventually I will have a novel.
Superbowls are the same way. There is simply no way you could make a reasonable plan to “get to the superbowl.” Too many things are outside of your control, including the actions of all the other teams, and the intensity of the conflict you will have to engage in. The task would be too huge. But you CAN plan to play the next game, and the next, and in that way reach your goal. Obviously the closer you get, the easier it is to see what must be done to get there.
Greatness is the destination, Competition is the road, Execution is the vehicle, and Pride is the fuel. Onward!!
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on May 24, 2008 1:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My quest.............
Is to urinate on every car handle that belongs to a charger/ raider fan car. I also like to carry around a couple extra bars of surf wax so I can coat their windows with horrible words about how lame their football teams are.
If I see a raider/charger fan on the road, I make sure to cut them off and then proceed to slam on my brakes. Some would call this obsession with vindication unhealthy. To those people I say there’s plenty of room for vaginas like you at Qualcomm.
I love our team just a little too much.
Bill Williamson is a gelatinous tub of goo. Al Davis eats his own poop.
by kwool79 on May 23, 2008 2:12 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
now now....
we don’t condone vandalism or inciting road rage. Besides, you are no good to anyone in jail and I doubt you want your insurance rates sky high.
fader nation is a conquered nation
by mdierk on May 23, 2008 2:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah but,
You don’t know what it’s like having to listen to these talking monkeys on a daily basis. Once they resort to calling us Donkey fans, I can loose it. But you’re right, I want to keep my insurance premiums nominal.
Bill Williamson is a gelatinous tub of goo. Al Davis eats his own poop.
by kwool79 on May 23, 2008 2:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I live in norcal, I no longer speak the monkey language of the fader nation. :)
If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
MHR's Bronco History
by Tim Lynch on May 23, 2008 2:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I usually rely on a translator.
Bill Williamson is a gelatinous tub of goo. Al Davis eats his own poop.
by kwool79 on May 23, 2008 3:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually do know what it's like
I grew up in Kansas during the Marty era for the Chefs. I got ragged on the whole time. Just tell the fans out there that…
“fader nation is a conquered nation” or “how can you possibly root for Phyllis and his merry men?”
guaranteed to make them mad!
fader nation is a conquered nation
by mdierk on May 23, 2008 3:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll add it to the arsenal.
Bill Williamson is a gelatinous tub of goo. Al Davis eats his own poop.
by kwool79 on May 23, 2008 3:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Faders in our midst
I feel for you guys living in enemy territory, but things are not that rosey even in Broncoland. We have scores of idiot Fader fans in this town. I believe that it’s mostly because certain people want to piss off the local Bronco fans. Gang Bangers everywhere are sporting Fader gear. They like to start trouble at the sports bars in Denver during Fader games and are the worst of fans… well not even fans. (My perception is that they have the IQ of an average number of annual wins by the Faders)
I see them everywhere year round. It irritates me when these hoods show up at the sport bars and support a rival Bronco team because they only want to make others not enjoy watching the game. This is what gives the Fader Nation Fans and a few others a bad name. (im actually being kind here)
On the other hand, I do see a few genuine Raider Fans because they grew up in Oakland or the Bay area. They still support their team and are good football fans. Granted they are still Oakland fans, but they aren’t at my favorite bar because they simply hate the Broncos. I can have a reasonable conversation and we can banter each other without fear that they are going to pull a knife or something. Don’t worry Bronco faithfuls, I still encourage them to move back to the coast. And yes, there really are quite a few right here in our midst.
"If Denver beats us, I'll walk back to Detroit"
Alex Karras
by Denver Diehard on May 24, 2008 2:27 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know exactly what your are saying
They totally out number the Charger fans here. SD has a ticket policy if you want the raider/charger game you HAVE to buy 2 other games. Its usually the morons from LA and East SD going to the games, and Charger fans not wanting to deal with these losers. There are generally 20-30 fights. A few years ago some losers supporting the faders stabbed a dude during the game, he got 10 years. Now I dont mind the true fader fan because they are usually smart but the team is a laughing stock the black hole is a bigger joke than that fat guy in the Dog Pound in cleveland and the 90% of loser fans are idiots. I use to read the DP online and read the comments. Man, how things have changed since I left home. When I left 95% bronco fans were true Orange and Blue, now I read how this team sucks and Shanny needs to go. I know these people are most likely the minority but they are so clueless. Plus my Pops is telling me how the media is just attacking the Broncos. Sad. Thats why TJ Simers got booted from the RMN for bashing Elway now you assc clowns like Kizla and Armstrong. Pathetic. Were is Joe Sanchez and Dick Conner (may he be resting in peace) when you need them
by broncfanstuckinsd on May 24, 2008 11:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just take pictures...I will post them on charger-fader forums. :)
I do condone random acts of crime. It’s your jail term, not mine! :D
If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
MHR's Bronco History
by Tim Lynch on May 23, 2008 2:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bronco fan in So cal
I would be more than happy to some pictuers with you guys.
I was at the Bronco Charger game in SD last Christmas Eve, and let me tell you, it was brutal. I never took a verbal ass raping like that in my life. I was decked out in all my Bronco gear so I was a lightning rod for random smack talk.
I even ran into a couple college buddies at the game who couldn’t believe I was wearing orange and blue. I told them that I didn’t remember either of them EVER talking about the chargettes when we were in school. Got to love them fairweather fans.
Bill Williamson is a gelatinous tub of goo. Al Davis eats his own poop.
by kwool79 on May 23, 2008 3:17 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
San Diego is all fairweather...
I was born in San Diego and moved back there for a spell in the mid to late 90’s. I went to a game in 98, the Chargers were like 1-10 and the Broncos were like 11-0….slaughter even though Elway threw like 5 INTs.
If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
MHR's Bronco History
by Tim Lynch on May 23, 2008 3:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I went to the Broncos/Cahrger game in 1997
Tell how fair wether their fans are I was me and 2 buddies and we were surrounded by STEELER fans. About 10 rows down were the charger fans. Plus we ended moving up becuase the stadium was empty. Ahh the good ol days of Chager fans, before the doucheness became en vogue here
by broncfanstuckinsd on May 23, 2008 4:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We get a bunch of East Coast fans
Mostly because the East Coast is a good place to be from. Jeeze how do you go from a great post like this to pissing on my car doors? ;-)
"He's doing everything a receiver would do except catch the ball." Mike Shanahan
by Brian (DaBolts) on May 23, 2008 8:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wrestled with the poll myself.
I confess that I wasn’t as profound as Styg in my thinking, nor as cautious as our dear friend from across the pond Claus. My thinking went as follows.
The SB is a good goal (in fact the ultimate), but not always the most realistic. If I want a SB every year I’m in for some major dissapoinment. I know what I don’t want, and that’s a losing season. Even an 8-8 season is not respectable.
A team can have a “winning season” with a 9-7 record, but is not likely to make the playoffs. A 10-6 record typically means a playoff spot. Thus, a team winning 10 games is my minimum standard. But it isn’t my “goal”.
I believe that a team that plays each game as if it was the SB is more likely to get their than a team focused on the SB from the start of the season. I strongly advocate a “one game at a time” mentality. If a team does this, and makes the playoffs, the season starts anew. The only variable remaining from the season is home field and byes.
The playoffs are a season that I want to play in. The regular season means little if a team didn’t make it to the playoffs.
Points aren’t as much an issue to me as to Styg (perhaps becuase I love defenses). If we don’t score a lot of points, but our opponents don’t score any, I’m happy. The best regular season stretch I’ve enjoyed was a couple of years ago when the “show blitz” defense kept opposing teams with a touch down for game after game. Not as much fun for many fans, but for a defensophilliac like myself it was bliss.
Along with making the playoffs, I put equal weight on respect. If a team makes the playoffs, but is considered a lucky team that “backed in”, I’m not so thrilled. I want to make the playoffs, and I want make it in strong fashion.
Not making the SB or losing in the SB will let me down a lot, but it won’t leave the bad taste of a year in which we don’t even make the playoffs, or do it with a team that barely deserved it.
This year, if the team shows improvement, they should have a shot at a wildcard at the very least. I’ll be happy with a playoff berth. There are plenty of teams out there that shouldn’t get that far, and I believe an improved Broncos team is better than those. 9 wins or less isn’t acceptable. 10 wins is acceptable if the team makes the playoffs. Anything can happen “any given Sunday”, so I can forgive a playoff loss more readily that a poor regular season.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on May 23, 2008 4:27 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Points
I will address the idea of points again below with Mr. B. Billy, but I will say here that my concrete concern for the season is scoring TDs in the redzone, not necessarily points, and I only touched on it briefly as a way of A)Giving a little breathing room to the reader in a largely abstract discussion, and B) To try and show the process that I reasoned through to come up with Pride as my ultimate goal for The Quest.
Not to badger the defensive guys, but I will say this: If you don’t score any points, you will not be the winner after 60 minutes of football.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on May 24, 2008 1:53 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hear ya.
Of course, if the other team doesn’t score any points…
My mindset is kind of strange. I’ve never been one to hope for points, so much as I want to stop the other team. It really is a joint effort, but the vast majority of fans lean towards te offensive side of things. My thinking is that defenses normaly prevent points, set up the offense with field position, and sometimes even score points. So I’m clearly biased.
But I understand your point (which is different from “most fans”) about your answer being in the abstract, and your differentiation between “points” and the need for the team to improve in the redzone. I failed to make the distinction on my first reading.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on May 24, 2008 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
In all honesty,
I believe I stereotyped Styg in that “most fans like scoring” category and also did not make that distinction in reading his article at first. I now truly understand his philosophy and agree with it. Sorry, I stereotyped you as one of the majority, Styg.
HT, I think we may on the same page with defense. I loved watching the Broncos keeping almost every opponent to 10 or less points to start the ‘06 season. I would rather see us win 17-3 than 37-24. Even if we won 37-24, it still means the defense gave up 24 points – and that’s a problem. I guess only scoring 17 points can also be a problem, but I never see it as a glaring weakness when we win. I’m sure my opinion is biased from my faith in Elway and Shanahan all those years knowing that they would always do their job and score enough points to win. Where as, I was never as comfortable with our defense.
"On the Plains of Hesitation bleach the bones of countless millions, who, at the Dawn of Victory, sat down to wait, and waiting--died!" - George W. Cecil
by Bronco Billy on May 24, 2008 1:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed 100%
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on May 24, 2008 1:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
As Zappa said this article was epic...
This is why I have a difficult time disagreeing with one idea – points. Points, while a measure of productivity, measure primarily offense. Wins are the true measure of productivity for a team. You don’t make the playoffs based on points scored, but by wins. While it is true that the team with the most points wins, your article focused on scoring points. Holding the oppostion to fewer points was omitted.
Like Hoosier, I too love defense. Old school though I may be, I still believe in a solid running game and solid defense. My case rests with the victors of the last Super Bowl. I loved it when we blitzed one more man than the other team could block. Champ Bailey is my favorite player to watch live. He is incredible. Only he truly shuts down his side of the field and you cannot truly appreciate it on TV.
Nevertheless, your article is fantastic and inspirational. Inspiring the masses through writing is not an easy task. IMHO, you just left out one major detail.
"On the Plains of Hesitation bleach the bones of countless millions, who, at the Dawn of Victory, sat down to wait, and waiting--died!" - George W. Cecil
by Bronco Billy on May 23, 2008 7:19 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Well-Stated Bronco Billy
Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of our own mind. - Emerson
by firstfan on May 23, 2008 8:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really hope
I don’t come across as hatin’ on defense with this points discussion, because I love all aspects of football, but I really wanted to clarify my thinking on a few points:
1. I don’t believe points are primarily a measure of offense, just like I don’t believe that a shutout is primarily a measure of defense. The two sides complement eachother and rely on eachother so much that I can’t separate the notion of points out amongst them. For example, an offense can’t score points (outside of winning a toin coss) without the defense getting them an opportunity with the ball. Likewise, a defense can’t reasonably hold an opponent scoreless unless the offense can control the clock or score enough times to limit the opponents offensive options. I don’t believe that the exceptions to either case invalidate the principles behind them.
2. I think it is a mistake to think of points in the same light as we think of statistics. Statistics describe actions, preferably virtuous actions like catching the ball or tackling the ballcarrier. Points describe values. The difference is that virtues are actions you take to acquire values, and values are things you require for survival, or in the case of football, winning. I personally would never assign points as the perogative of the offense, because points are too fundamentally valuable to every player on the team. Each to the best of his abiltiy and capacity are trying to earn points. Likewise with preventing points.
3. This is really the heart of what you are saying, so I will treat it carefully: I don’t feel that i omitted the concept of holding the opposition from scoring points, but I did omit the FEWER points part. I DID explicitly advocate scoring points in the redzone, which is entirely on the offense, but that part is just my opinion of our greatest weakness, and I appreciate opinions to the contrary. However, the more abstract element of the article that dealt with points was meant to address scoring points as the height of football productivity (which I probably didn’t do very well). It is my understanding that by advocating this I would be implicitly advocating the opponent NOT scoring. Specifically, I would be saying that if we are scoring a TD, then the opponent cannot also be scoring a TD at the same time. Within the context of the events of a game, hwoever, you are right, the concept of FEWER points is very important.
This last is adressed to the defensophiliacs in the crowd: Is it ever proper to refer to the defense as having STOPPED the opposing offense from scoring points, while during a game? Offhand, and not counting the physics notion of physically stopping or redirecting momentum, I would say that the only thing that can truly stop an offense, or more accurately a team, from scoring, is the clock counting down to 00:00. In other words, the offense and defense are extensions of eachother, both charged with the same fundamental task, but different opportunities for accomplishing it…. I must be getting tired…I’m begining to wonder if ANY of this makes sense… :)
And before I forget, thank you very much for the kind words. They are definitely appreciated.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on May 24, 2008 2:25 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent reply!
There is definitely virtue in brevity, so I can see why you didn’t go into greater detail when the original article was sufficiently detailed already. Again, you made some excellent points.
I never thought that you were hating on defense and I never intended to suggest that. You ‘speak” very well and am glad I entered my “rebuttal” so that we could carry this conversation further.
I completely agree that the offense and defense are dependent on each other to fulfill their mission of scoring or preventing points. Being a “defense” guy, I loathed our run defense last year, but I also agree that scoring in the red zone is the #1 thing that we must work on for this season. I don’t think (but am not sure if) this contradicts what I stated in my earlier post because I think that’s the major thing thing we need to do to win this year.
Thanks again for our reply!
"On the Plains of Hesitation bleach the bones of countless millions, who, at the Dawn of Victory, sat down to wait, and waiting--died!" - George W. Cecil
by Bronco Billy on May 24, 2008 1:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant to say scoring TDs in the red zone is the #1 thing we must work on.
"On the Plains of Hesitation bleach the bones of countless millions, who, at the Dawn of Victory, sat down to wait, and waiting--died!" - George W. Cecil
by Bronco Billy on May 24, 2008 1:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
But. . .
The blitzing scheme can backfire, AKA the 2005 AFC title game. I would rather have an effective pass rush speedy LB’s and our secndary. Champ takes away half the field but teams will attack Bly. I am not a fan of the blitz. I think with the running game getting back to one back dominating. I know they have ALWAYS been in the 10 rushing since 1995, but I want the play action to work and get our passing back into the top 10 as well. I think with Marshall and who ever is #2 and Stokley in the slot it can happen. Look when the Broncos played Tenessee last year that was on of the games where I could see the awesome potenetial of JC and a dominate running attack
by broncfanstuckinsd on May 24, 2008 11:37 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you.
I prefer a team that can generate enough of a rush with the front four to allow the LBs to do other duties. Fans love blitzes, but I’d rather have a good pass rush.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on May 24, 2008 1:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
2 take aways
I think you take away two things from last year and we would have had a pretty good season. Injuries and Jay going undiagnosed. I would still love to see someone really step up on Defense and say okay this is my squad. I think when that happens we will start to put the smack down.
I often day dream of watching Phyllis wrything in pain on the field after John Lynch crushes him. Is that wrong?
by ThorpeBroncosfan on May 23, 2008 11:41 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm trying to think
of defensive players who could fit the role you are talking about.
We have so many quiet leaders like DJ, DOOOM and Champ. Bly is also quietly confident, as is Foxy, who is also in perhaps too limited of a a roll to be a leader. Boss doesn’t strike me as the type to take ownership, and none of the safeties, except Lynch seem ready to take on a role like that.
Lynch has the right makeup, but even Atwater, the fiercest Bronco’s safety I have ever seen, wasn’t really the vocal leader that I think you are talking about, and i think it has to do with the responsibilities inherent in the safety position, but I’m not really sure about that.
K2 is in the ideal position, but it isn’t fair to him to expect it, and frankly, until he is quite clearly a true blue-and-orange Bronco, heart and soul, game in and game out, i don’t know if i could really rally around him. I can’t wait to find out though. :)
Here’s a thought: DOOM, Moss and Crowder talked a little about wanting to put their stamp on the Broncos this year. If they could successfully bookend this line, there is a good chance that they would end up being the tonesetters of the defense, much like Strahan was in New York. I would have zero problem with the Broncos defensive Identity being wrapped up in productive edge rushers who make opposing offenses ineffective and their QBs msierable….
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on May 24, 2008 2:40 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think K2 might surprise us.
I still can’t get over the back-up MLB being a team captain. He may have the guts to come in and take a leadership role quickly. It’s hard to do (being the new guy on the block), but perhaps possible for a strong leader.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on May 24, 2008 1:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Leadership
He was a team captain in Seattle and was respected and admired by players and coaches. I think we have a real winner in K2 and I would not be totally surprised to see him step into that leadership role.
So careful of the type it seems, So careless of the single life. - Tennyson
by firstfan on May 24, 2008 1:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
NIKO!
At this point in time I’m just playing the first name/ GTA relation card with friends who aren’t fans of the Broncos and don’t follow them, but love the GTA game.
You do seem to hear “if this guy wasn’t behind Tatupu he’d be a starter in the league” a lot…well, now he’s not behind Lofa anymore. It’s time for him to be a starter and at MLB we’re gonna need that leader type personality who can get there make the tackles and/or occupy bodies. As you said we’ve got some new guys on the D, but we’ve got some new guys who are eager to prove their worth to the world…ESPECIALLY on the linebacking corps (Boss from Detroit and Niko from Seattle).
by phantom818 on May 24, 2008 3:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
RE:I'm trying to think
Clearly we would look for K2 to take that role just by the nature of the PSN. But you’re right that may be unfair right now. Maybe later in the season.
I think in Denver it has come from our LB Core for a long time. I wouldn’t mind seeing it come from the line either. I just think it needs to come from some where.
Maybe Lynch with a chip on his shoulder. Because some people think he is too old. (I think he will have a huge year because of that.) Or maybe it’s our offense that gets our D fired up this year. But I definately think our D needs to find an identity of it’s own with in the team, if that makes sense.
by ThorpeBroncosfan on May 24, 2008 6:57 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I like the way you think!
Re: Lynch’s shoulder.
To my knowledge he has never suffered through an injury plagued season like 2007. The neck injury I think could be classified differently than most injuries, since it was freak and threatened to end his career with its severity. His comments recently about wanting to prove something, accompanied by his reinvigorated training routine tells me that he learned a valuable lesson this year, when despite his desire to bring everything he had, his body failed him.
He is addressing his physical status with new workouts, and I expect that it could give him an edge performance wise next year, possibly allowing him to earn back the respect that will keep him on the field for a greater variety of plays.
On a side note, regarding lynch, I ahve been thinking about hsi comments that he felt there were “some within the organization who probably didn’t want him back”. This is profoundly disturbing to me, as the only guy I can think of who might feel this way, who has any significance, is Slowik. On the other hand, i thought Slowik was really a fan of all his DBs, but maybe Lynch isn’t one of his favorites? I will leave the conjecture at that, before it gets out of hand…
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on May 24, 2008 9:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think pride and mental toughness
more than talent, is what last year’s team was missing. All teams get out of sync and have down periods, in a game, in a season, but if a team doesn’t lose its poise and intensity it maintains contact and comes back when the momentum shifts. A team lacking toughness gives up points in bunches and goes into a losing-streak tailspin. They get too far behind on the scoreboard and in the standings to make a comeback. They crack under pressure and give up too many easy scores and winnable games. In the Detroit game and the first Chargers game the Broncos just caved in. Bringing in guys with high character is the best way to reverse that mentality. It’s not just a matter of having players under whom a fire can be lit, although that’s a very good point. It also increases the odds that from among them will emerge a fiery leader who hurls defiance at the sports gods. We…will…not...be…stopped. We…will…not...be…beaten. We haven’t had that since Wilson got hurt and Plummer lost his nerve. Cutler is showing signs of becoming that guy on the offensive side of the ball. He looks like he’s ready to take over. D.J. and Champ both have the talent but not the personality to get guys to run through walls. Can K2 be that kind of leader? If he can it will make a huge difference.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on May 24, 2008 10:04 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
What a great post and great comments
Following up on spock’s comment, I think we are missing a running back with that “I will … not... be stopped” attitude. A guy who wants and expects the ball repeatedly in the red zone even if it is first and goal from the 9; a guy who will make sure he fights forward for the extra inches on third and short; a guy who will grind out first downs to run out the clock in the fourth quarter. Since Mike Anderson left, we have not had that guy. I am willing to give Travis Henry a mulligan since he was banged up last year, but if he doesn’t step up this year then someone else on the team needs to (Torain or Hills?)
by MattR on May 25, 2008 6:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
When not injured (a big if)...
Henry led the League. If he stays healthy we’re in for a treat.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on May 26, 2008 7:09 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Champ gave an interview to nfl players Assoc.
He seems to be back with a bit of good attitude – check it out.
http://www.nflplayers.com/user/content. ... 3&pid=1168
by Emmett Smith on May 24, 2008 10:35 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Link doesn't work
Is this the one you were talking about?
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on May 25, 2008 1:52 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Champ's Article
Thanks for the link.
It sounds like both Champ and Lynch are ready to leave it all on the field this year. We definately have the depth this year to get through the season. We have the talent. But as styg50 has stated do we have the pride? I think the team is ready this year.
by ThorpeBroncosfan on May 25, 2008 3:55 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes it was
And thanks, pointy eared friend :)
by Emmett Smith on May 27, 2008 10:54 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



























