Mile High Report: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

MHR University - RB Depth Schemes

As Denver looks at how to use their RB depth, let's take a brief look at the different ways that teams use RB depth. Each has advantages and disadvantages, and one isn't really the "best" way to go. It's a matter of what the team has available. Today we'll focus on roles of a RB with respect to depth (not roles in respect to player talent, like "power" or "speed"). These depth roles include primary, spell, change of pace, and rotational.

I figured this very short article would be good because we are focused on camp right now (and Guru's great updates), and because battles for depth positions are key right now. Enjoy!

Primary

The advantage to having a primary back is that a team has a back they can count on to play most downs in a game, and to excell in his position. The drawbacks is that he costs more, and if he goes down there is rarely someone good enough left to take his place.

Teams like Denver have the advantage of a system that negates the need for a primary back. If a RB goes down, any one cut runner can be put behind the zone block OL and do a credible job. In Denver's case, credible means a 1000+ yards season.

Spell

A spell back is used mostly with a primary back. If the RB tires out, the spell comes in to give him a break. Often, the number one consideration for a spell back is to just not give away the ball. When Mike Bell came in as a spell last year and fumbled, he committed a cardinal sin.

Change of Pace

Some folks look at this role as an insult to a player. It's not. It's a key role filled by a specialist. A change of pace RB is typically a power guy that is brought in for short yardage situations (remember the Bears and the Fridge?).

In other systems, especialy committee back systems, a power RB wears down the defense, and a speed specialist is brought in to tear up the field. Often the fans see the exploits of the speed back, and demand that he plays a greater role, forgetting that it was the power back who made the long, flashy run possible by wearing down the defense.

Rotational

A rotational back is one of two backs that trades equal time as a starter. In coach speak, the second player on the depth chart is called the rotational (even if he is on an equal footing with the #1).

The criticism of using rotations is that the team must not have a back good enough to be a primary back. This may or may not be fair, depending on the system. Rotationals extend the playing life of a RB, and keep the RBs fresh. It also makes scheming by the defense more difficult. It's downside is that a RB may not get into a "rhythm" during the game.

As always, fire away with any questions on this, or any other subject relating to the great game of football!

1 recs  |  Comment 63 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I know the particular instance might be "rotational"

but I submit we forward the “Primary Rotational” system as a candidate for the list :P

I am, of course, referring to the Bells that graced Bronco uniforms together a few years back. Shanny decided to go with whoever was “the hot back” game in and game out. Boy, what that fun. Gotta love the pounding Shanny took from fantasy football owners for that.

As long as the zone blocking system survives, this new replacement youth on the line could very well cement the rotational or spell system in Denver for years to come as the old O-Line had done successfully for a few good years. Correct?

Furthermore, would you say a zone blocking system is one that is the most conducive to that type of depth usage?

by phantom818 on May 29, 2008 3:15 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes, and yes.

The zone block system helps to ensure that the rotational system will be used at RB. It isn’t required, but the ability to rotate instead of paying a primary back is considered an advantage of zone blocking.

And yes again, the zone block system is probably one of the best examples of facilitating a RB by committee approach.

Remember also that the terms I used in this article can also apply to other positions, like the DTs and DEs.

Good questions!

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 29, 2008 5:24 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

You describe the Raiders situation perfectly here........

Fargas and Bush will be in a roughly equal rotation, favoring Fargas slightly, with Run DMC providing the change of pace HR hitter that the Raiders have been lacking. All of these backs are tailor made for the ZB scheme, and having them all fresh, all the time, is going to go along way towards the Raiders leading the league in rushing.

OakFoSho

S&BP > Mile High Mules ............ Like Sharks? http://mvn.com/nhl-sharks/

by 0akFoSho on May 29, 2008 10:28 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never really thought of the spell back in that way, but now that you mention it, it does make sense. If you are coming in because the primary back is tired, any yardage you make is gravy, just don’t cough up the ball!

by poorboywilly on May 29, 2008 3:25 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Almost every FanPost right now...

Has to do with depth. In baseball, the best depth is in the farm system, but there isn’t an equivalent in football, so they obviously have to create depth in the team itself. What positions are the best to have depth at? (sorry for the horrible wording there). Do the really good teams have a ton of depth everywhere or just at the positions that really matter? Is it better to have less depth at more positions or more depth at certain positions?

Another great lesson, by the way!

www.notthisday.com ....coming September 26th and 27th at the Pinnacle Event Center, Denver.

by Squeaky on May 29, 2008 3:45 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

That's a good question.

And the answer comes down to style. A team might spread the salary over a lot of depth, but not have the money for a few great players. Another team spends a lot of money on some great players, but has terrible players in depth.

What I like about Denver this year is that they have a few very good players that are developing, and we bypassed the tempting “big money” names to get solid depth.

Right now we have great depth at several positions, including WR, CB, SAF, RB, DE, and OL. Look at last year. We had a few big names, but when injuries hit, we went downhill fast.

Where the depth goes and how the talent (and money) is spread is a function of good management and coaching, and I imagine there are several approaches.

At the high school level we only had the pool of players that went out for the team. However, the “reloading season” competition for me was with the the offensive coordinator (friendly, of course). We often argued (in a professional way) over who got which player. My goal was to help the team, not just the defense (and the other coordinator felt the same way). So what I tried to do was this: Fill the defense with good players at every position. Not great players, just good. As long as I didn’t have any weak starters, I felt I could do anything. I’d give the best player to the offense, if the other guy just let me have two or three good players.

Obviously I’ll never coach at the college or pro level. But I like to think that my initial approach would be “I don’t care if I have a few or a lot of great players, as long as none of my starters are poor”. In such a system, I could also (I imagine) afford to have good players in depth.

Shanahan and co have done a great job in signing contracts at affordable rates, bringing in young talent, building depth, and still managing to cull some excellent players. I really think we are positioned to be respectable this year, but great fro the next several years thereafter.

I hope that helps answer your question.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 29, 2008 5:17 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

A question still lingers...

Your statement about the Broncos bypassing “big money” names raised a question that I’m not sure anyone might have an answer to, but I’ll post it anyway.

Why did Denver bypass “big names” this year?

I’m not second-guessing their decision. In fact, I am more excited about this season than almost any other season in the post-Elway era. I have two possible reasons, but can’t decide which one is more reasonable. Heck, it’s even possible that both are true.

1) Free agents were receiving huge salaries this year and Denver did not see any “valuable” free agents.

2) Injuries last year made Shanny realize that he better add some depth to his club in case of a similar scenario this year.

"On the Plains of Hesitation bleach the bones of countless millions, who, at the Dawn of Victory, sat down to wait, and waiting--died!" - George W. Cecil

by Bronco Billy on May 30, 2008 12:03 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see a few reasons.

For one, you can bring in a big name and that name can be hit or miss. But with depth, only one of the players has to be a good pick.

Depth also fosters competition, which brings up the effort of all players.

Depth (as you mention) is insurance against injuries (something we didn’t have last year).

Depth also provides more good players in more positions, while targeting a few very good players can leave holes in other positions.

Depth is more helpful in brining along young members, versus targeting big names (which pushes youngsters down the chart).

Depth also costs less than targeting big names, which allows money to be spent on other positions.

I think your second reason is a good one. In your first reason, I don’t think the issue was a lack of valuable FAs. I just think Denver needed to make up for a few poor draft years.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 30, 2008 2:51 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks.

I like your rational better!

"On the Plains of Hesitation bleach the bones of countless millions, who, at the Dawn of Victory, sat down to wait, and waiting--died!" - George W. Cecil

by Bronco Billy on May 31, 2008 11:19 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know that every team wishes for that rare running back that has both

speed and power. Franchise running backs that play a majority of the game are preferable to running backs by committee, because whenever a committee approach is employed there are invariably conflicts with egos. Being “The Man” is an ego thing, and when you are not considered able to be “The Man” then that bruised ego might result in poor performance. I want “The Man” to be in Denver, whose back we can ride to another Championship! I just can’t stop talking about a franchise back…I am tired of running back by committee that Shanny has fallen in love with. It’s time to shake things up a bit!

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 29, 2008 4:08 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Of course, I like the committee approach. lol

Either is good. Egos can be an issue in either system. At least we seem to have high quality, character guys who leave the ego to the side to help the team (like Henry taking a pay cut).

There are advantages both ways, and the nice thing about the zone block is the ability to play committee. I guess one thing I like is the ability to extend the playing life of your HBs. This also allows us to spend less money on big name HBs, and allows us to spend the money elsewhere.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 29, 2008 5:20 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Henry took a pay cut because he knew he had no alternative...

if he isn’t “The Man” this season he will demand a trade come next offseason. You can take that to the bank!

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 29, 2008 5:32 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree.

Javon could have taken a pay cut to stay with the Broncos and he didn’t. We are critical of him for that (and rightly so). We should be consistent, and praise Henry for doing what many players wouldn’t do. The only thing he has ever done to hurt this team was getting injured, and that certainly wasn’t his fault.

He had a choice (in my opinion), and I think he came through with flying colors.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 29, 2008 5:39 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Javon didn't because he was no longer "The Man"....Travis Henry took it

because he still thought he is “The Man” at RB. It’s all about perception! ;)

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 29, 2008 5:45 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really disagree.

If Henry thougt he was the man, he might have been like Javon and figured he could play anywhere. When Denver brought a cut proposal to Javon, he took his ball and left. Henry stayed.

I guess my question is, what has the guy done to deserve any scorn? All I’ve seen from him is praise for his coach and team mates, and accpeting a pay cut. I just don’t get why anyone would have a problem with him at this point. It sound like you are upset with him for something he might do down the road, but so far I don’t think he’s earned that.

It’s just my opinion. But I think the guy has been upstanding since he’s gotten here.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 29, 2008 6:02 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have scorned him because I see him as

the Brian Griese of our time, trying to fill the shoes of Elway(TD in his case). I demand better. No, that’s not fair. He is more like the Jake Plummer of our time…good, but not great. I want GREAT!

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 29, 2008 6:29 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Henry was doing "great"

Henry was leading the league in rushing yards, if I’m not mistaken, before getting injured. Plus, he still tried to go out and compete through the pain. What shows up on the TV is a player coming off the field every game. But, I think he has heart. After seeing him take a pay cut to help the team, I am even more convinced of that now.

If nothing else, Henry has what he deserves, another chance to prove he’s the #1 back in the organization. There’s some real competition, so it won’t be a cakewalk. If he’s starting at the beginning of the season, it’s not because Shanny gave it to him – he earned it.

"On the Plains of Hesitation bleach the bones of countless millions, who, at the Dawn of Victory, sat down to wait, and waiting--died!" - George W. Cecil

by Bronco Billy on May 29, 2008 11:53 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

No one would remain a Donkey......

with Al flashing all that cash. Then you want him to take a pay cut on top of leaving all that money to remain a Donkey? Dreaming! Lets get realistic man, its called Free Agency, and he would have to be a fool to leave the deal he got with the Raiders to take a pay cut with the Donkeys.

You can say the Raiders over payed to get Javon, but I tend to believe his production will determine whether the Raiders made a good deal. To ask a guy to leave that much money on the table is ridiculous and would never happen.

OakFoSho

S&BP > Mile High Mules ............ Like Sharks? http://mvn.com/nhl-sharks/

by 0akFoSho on May 29, 2008 10:34 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not called FA.

Javon wasn’t a FA. He left the team under contract.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 30, 2008 2:54 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can you explain how this is possible........

w/o the Donkeys releasing him. The Donkeys did release him right? Does that not make him a FA? He took offers from all around the league. I’m serious, if he is not a Free Agent, how does that work?

OakFoSho

S&BP > Mile High Mules ............ Like Sharks? http://mvn.com/nhl-sharks/

by 0akFoSho on May 30, 2008 1:20 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

In context

While Javon was a FA, he wasn’t a FA in the sense that most FAs are (players that have finished a contract to the team and go out looking for a better deal). Javon was under contract with Denver, made some foolish, public remarks about being unable to start for the team, and was unwilling to continue playing for the team. He basicaly did the same thing to GB.

Did he become a FA through his actions? Yes. But I inferred from your remarks that Javon left the team in a “FA” manner, which is that another team “flashed cash” at him and he just made a decision anyone else would (which would break the rules while Javon was under contract). No cash was flashed until Javon refused to continue as a player and Denver chose to release him.

(It is worth noting that while oakland was quick to overpay a player that hasn’t seen much of the field the last 2 out of three years, no one else was even willing to trade for the guy).

Enjoy Javon all you want. When healthy he really is a terrific player. But he has a habit of stabbing his teams in the back, and he is only on the field every three years. I think he’ll fit in well.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 30, 2008 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok, I'll be the guy to ask the dumb question.

Given our roster, wouldn’t it make sense to pound like hell with Henry (or Torrain if Henry goes down) and then insert Young? All of Young’s carries come in the series before half and in the second half of the fourth quarter.

What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us. - Raplh Waldo Emerson

by firstfan on May 29, 2008 5:21 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Denver did exactly this in the Indy game last year and had over 150 yards rushing (I think) in the first half. Henry came in and ran hard. Then, they brought in Selvin for change of pace later. They even ran a “delay reverse” to Young which confused everyone. I have a hard time calling a hand-off to the RB a reverse, but that’s about the best way I could describe it.

As for doing this every week, Shanny has set his precedence on changing up the offensive game plan every week to throw off not only the team they are playing, but future opponents as well. You will not see Henry pound the ball like you describe, week after week. The game plan is almost always coordinated so our offensive strengths capitalize on that defense’s weaknesses.

"On the Plains of Hesitation bleach the bones of countless millions, who, at the Dawn of Victory, sat down to wait, and waiting--died!" - George W. Cecil

by Bronco Billy on May 30, 2008 12:12 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's not dumb at all!

There are several ways to soften up a defense.

You could go the “FirstFan” approach, which is to hit hard for a little over a quarter in each half, then pull the starter for a second RB. This is called “Late Power” running.

You can also hit with a power runner, then use a change up runner every few plays (either another power guy, or a fast guy). This is simply called “Change of Pace” running.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 29, 2008 5:29 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

If nothing else, training camp will be interesting.

Thanks for the explanation ht!

What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us. - Raplh Waldo Emerson

by firstfan on May 29, 2008 6:33 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Great job

as usual, HT. Thanks!

by BornOrange on May 29, 2008 9:57 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

franchise backs...

if shanny is right about torain’s first-round talent, then by next season you may have your franchise back. he has to be GREAT for that scheme to succeed, though. of course, you won’t see much of young then in that scenario, which would be a waste of his talent. i would be very happy with a torain/young combo next season, if torain proves he can be the man. i just don’t believe he is going to be healthy enough or knowledgable enough this season to take over the rb position.
young as a franchise back would be suicide-by-pigskin. ht noted above-”Often the fans see the exploits of the speed back, and demand that he plays a greater role, forgetting that it was the power back who made the long, flashy run possible by wearing down the defense. ” there are countess examples of change-of-pace guys getting to start, and the odds are they will not succeed. i always like to use lamont jordan as an example, because he was so highly touted, a sure thing. curtis martin just made him look good.
tiki barber is an example of an exeption to this rule, but there are very few.

give it some time, and remember, “td’s and mccafferey’s don’t grow on trees”.

by davecheffy on May 30, 2008 1:10 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Al Davis and his Riches

0ak, you crack me up. Al Davis had to sell a 5% stake in the Raiders to even raise the cash to overpay the free agents he signed. He’s the least personally wealthy owner in the NFL, and didn’t acquire the team by excelling in another business, like 30 of the 31 other ownership families (Mike Brown in Cincinnati also being a relative poverty case.)

The Javon Walker signing was universally considered to be insane league-wide. Nobody else was offering within $25 million of what the Raiders offered, but I guess that’s a dysfunctional-franchise premium. Then there’s Tommy Kelly, a slightly below-average DT coming off an ACL tear. Paying that guy $50 million is just absurd. Gibril Wilson? Remember Larry Brown? They haven’t even paid McFadden yet, either, and he is more like Reggie Bush than he is like Adrian Peterson. Have fun overpaying for him, too. The NFL is not a league for tall, skinny-legged, upright runners, and picking one 4th overall puts your salary structure in a tough spot. Raiders fans will be moaning about how they could have had Glenn Dorsey for the next 10 years, you watch.

0ak, thanks for making me laugh on a Friday morning before work. We’re all pretty optimistic and happy to be Broncos fans around here, which I suspect is why you visit us. Maybe the Raiders will get a new owner for Christmas one of these years, and rejoin the ranks of the viable, and y’all can feel good too.

"I wouldn't ever set out to hurt anyone deliberately unless it was, you know, important --like a league game or something." DICK BUTKUS

by Ted Bartlett on May 30, 2008 6:04 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

As styg50 would say, Classic.

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 30, 2008 8:10 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

What works for Denver....

is having an attack like we had in 2005. Mike Anderson to pound and Tatum Bell to hit the “HR” runs. Unfortunatley, losing Anderson to the Ravens and Bell flopping in 2006 led to the run failures in 2006 and 2007. TD was a special player that had both power and speed, but it is a rare combination to find. At this point, they need to find players that will fill the role (circa 2005). Will it be Henry and Young? or could it be someone else?

fader nation is a conquered nation

by mdierk on May 30, 2008 8:38 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Commitee approcah versus Franchise back approach

Great topic. How about proof that the commitee approach is better (at least in the current version of the NFL)...

Look at the history of recent NFL Champs:

Giants-commitee
Colts-committe
Steelers-committee
Pats-committe
Pats-committe
Bucs-commitee
Pats-commitee
Ravens-Franchise
Rams-Franchise
Broncos-Franchise
Broncos-Franchise

The top franchise backs currently and their playoff wins as the starter:

LaDanian Tomlinson-2
Larry Johnson-0
Adrian Peterson-0
Steven Jackson-0
Bryan Westbrook-2
Frank Gore-0

Joe Addai has 2 playoff wins, but he was part of a ‘commitee’ approach that year w/ Dom Rhodes, who consequently had the big Super Bowl and was overpaid the next season by the Raiders.

by super7 on May 30, 2008 2:11 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

The pendulum will swing back the other way...you'll see!

Although you are very convincing…but I need to keep hammering home the franchise back position or I wouldn’t have much to debate with HT anymore. :)

I still think a TD or LT type back in Denver would bring us a World Championship.

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 30, 2008 2:26 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have to agree Zappa

I think we could use a commitee but we wont have the threat we need until our backfield has one guy that everyone gameplans against!

Until Terrell Davis makes it into the Hall of Fame, I refuse to acknowledge the existence of such a place other than the Ring of Fame at Mile High!

Davis to the Hall!

by Jon Tollerud on May 30, 2008 2:28 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

super7 shoots...

...and he scores!

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 30, 2008 2:47 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually not really.

John Elway + TD = Championship
John Elway + Committee= Blowouts
Jay Cutler + Committee = Zero Playoff Appearances
Jay Cutler + Franchise RB = ?

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 30, 2008 2:49 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

In fact, in the Mike Shanny era...

Playoff Wins with Franchise RB = 7
Playoff Wins with Committee = 1

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 30, 2008 2:50 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

One step further

Playoff Losses with Franchise RB = 1
Playoff Losses with Committee = 4

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 30, 2008 2:51 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

One step all the way.

Putting your numbers together with super7’s numbers tells me that Denver did well in another era, before the back by committee scheme took off. In the last seven years the franchise back scheme hasn’t won a SB, but before that it was always the franchise back scheme.

I think we are just moving into a new era is all. I wonder how much longer we might have kept TD if we had protected him in a committee system?

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 30, 2008 3:21 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was not always a franchise back scheme...

The Giants of the 80’s and 90’s used two backs. Redskins in the late era 80’s-90’s. Dolphins of the 70’s had multiple bruisers. Which is why I dont think the issue is as cut and dry as that, I think it varies from team to team.

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 30, 2008 3:30 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

A couple of points

1. There are exceptions, but the trend in SB championship teams is pretty clear.

2. Another point is that Denver hasn’t won or lost based soley on running. You’ll perhaps note too the amazing string of 1000+ yard runners since TD, and Denver’s great winning record even without Elway.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 31, 2008 3:18 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zap, my comment was a little tongue in cheek

but you know what I mean…

Football is cyclical, and yes, the franchise back will make a triumphant return to the Super Bowl champion’s stage.

Shanny Super Bowl wins w/ Elway = 2
Shanny Super Bowls w/o Elway = 0

Again, look at the list of the teams who’ve recently won the Super Bowl. If the secret sauce was top flight QB and top flight RB, I think somebody would have done that in the last 8 years. Except for the Rams (99), the other champs with a franchise back were all teams that had drafted their own franchise back.

I think this boils down to economics, if you ask my opinion.

Denver was lucky enough to have drafted Davis in the 6th round.
It seems like the teams that are have a top RB drafted them, and typically, drafted them in the first round or two.

What I’m trying to say is, yes, I’d love to have Cutler, Marshall, Champ, Bly, Moss, Doom, Nalen, Graham, and add an LT, or someone like that, to the team, but they’d either have to release a few of their big-money starters just to be able to afford him, and even then, they’d only have a year or 2 to get the job done.

The Broncos draft RBs and pull RBs off of the undrafted list every year to try and find their next T.D. They just haven’t gotten it done yet (although my gut tells me that Selvin Young could be Brian Westbrook 2.0)

by super7 on May 30, 2008 3:33 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent point...it does all come down to economics.

If BMarsh, Doom, and Schef have big years this year then they are all going to get a sizable contract next season…I remember Elway took a major paycut just so Shanny could bring in all those FA’s to make one last push to Super Bowl back in 95-96

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 30, 2008 3:49 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

John Elway...he had a running back by committee most of his career

and all he has to show for it is 3 Super Bowl blowouts.

If you look at those years, many of the Super Bowl losers had running back by committtees and the ones that didn’t were Super Bowl pretenders in my opinion(Seattle for example).

It’s easy to see a shift when most teams are doing the committee style running attack…but mark my words, it will change again in the near future. The committee approach has been around a long long time…it all depends on the team and the personnel.

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 30, 2008 2:48 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zap, you're right, the popularity of the committee system is cyclical.

But Denver’s defense and general lack of offensive talent was to blame as well in those SB’s. We can’t pin it on poor Sammy Winder, Gerald Wilhite, Melvin Bratton, and Steve Sewell. Although, Sewell did fumble at midfield in Buffalo in the 1991 AFC Champioship Game (after we recovered an oinside kick!) as Denver was driving at the end of the game (with Kubiak because Elway got hurt, all of this after Treadwell missed 3 fg’s, I’m getting mad typing this right now).

Anyhoo…sometimes it also depends on the popular defense. 3-4 was big in the mid 80’s thru early 90’s and then 4-3 got popular. Maybe there’s a “chicken vs. the egg” post in there somewhere about defensive scheme and franchise running backs, and which changes first and prompts the other. BUT it’s Friday and I need a 6 pack and NFL films.

I’ll get back to you on that…

by super7 on May 30, 2008 3:48 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

That 1991 AFC Championship game used to bother me too,

but really…what chance would we have had at winning that Super Bowl? Screw it…We are only two Super Bowl wins away from a .500 record. If we had gone to that Super Bowl and lost, we’d be 3 wins away from a .500 record. Eek!

I need the pre-season to start. I had fun “debating” the issue with you though.

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 30, 2008 3:55 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well done super7

You get the A+ for the day!

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 30, 2008 2:38 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really am at the top of my game right now...

let the blood letting continue!

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 30, 2008 2:51 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

fyi, everything I say is all in good clean fun.

debate can be lively, but in the end just know that I am always right. ;)

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 30, 2008 2:56 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

a little off topic, but i got one...

denver defense – jim bates = hope

by davecheffy on May 30, 2008 3:29 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I Find it odd that we have all embraced this plays over players philosophy with the running game, RB is the only position on the team where we dont try and bring in superior athlets, think about it we go and get a good tight end, in the draft a good WR a top QB, linemen on both sides of the ball DBs line backers. Shany has spent top draft picks on every position except running back. All because he found a steal wit davis, I mean scouts make mistakes all the time look at tony romo, Ryan Grant, tom brady, marquis colston, tj hushmanzada, hell rod smith wasnt drafted.

But because great players are found in late rounds dosnt mean thats where you should be lookin for the building blocks of your franchise. If you have a chance to get a good RB why not take em, we wont let a good player at any other position pass us by but when it comes to RB we think we can pull any bum off the streets and he’ll have 1000 yards.

I dont understant draftin a bottom feeder at the RB position this year when there where plenty of better players available in late rounds…..TASHARD CHOICE. unless one of these late round guys pans out im afraid my super bowl dreams wont come to fruition unless we get a top rated RB in one of the future drafts.

by mc821 on May 30, 2008 7:49 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

We drafted Clinton Portis in the second round...that's probably what

scared Shanny away from top running backs. lol

I was a big fan of Xavier Omon…yours was Tashard Choice. I doubt we’ll ever know why we passed on those guys in favor of Ryan Torain.

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 30, 2008 10:02 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a good thing we looked for "bottom feeders"...

...when we went for TD.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 31, 2008 3:21 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

From the DenverBroncos.com

We got a teaser that bears on this – it seems that although Eddie Royal has gotten a lot of well-deserved good press in the past few days, Torain has been impressing the Coach:

After seeing Torain perform during the last two weeks, Shanahan expects the fifth-round selection to contribute in the Broncos backfield this season.

“He’s done a great job,” Shanahan said. “He’s picked things up very quickly. As we all know at the running back position you really can’t tell until you have some live ammunition out there and people are trying to tackle you. But I have been impressed with the way he has worked so far. You can see his cutting ability and his ability to catch the ball. He’s looked good.”

Torain was surprised with how smooth quarterback camp went.

“The offense is rolling,” he said. “It is coming pretty easy. The coach is working with us so much, I feel good about it.”

Torain said the formula for competing at the NFL level is pretty easy—it all comes down to having confidence, a hard work ethic and utilizing your talent.

There is a backfield full of running backs trying to apply the same formula.

“It is great competition,” he said. “This is the top level of football so you just have to work hard and get a spot.”

Although some of us, including myself, have wondered if Torain might not start the season on the IR, perhaps he’s going to be the back that we are looking for to either work the commitee, or to excel in the tradition of TD. Since Pittman can also move to FB, where we might see Hillis solidify that weakness, we are looking at both the best group of receivers in recent memory and also a potentially lethal backfield to both guard Cutler and to give opposing players fits.

It can all change overnight, but from here it looks like the pieces are definitely coming together.

O'Brien's Law states that Murphy was an optimist.

by Emmett Smith on May 30, 2008 11:16 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I would prefer the set up that has Pittman and Hillis as our FB

and Henry, Young, Torain, and Hall are out RBs.

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
Win the Division. WIN THE DIVISION!

by Tim Lynch on May 31, 2008 12:13 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

defense wins championships, kickers lose them

super7, i actually have this game on dvd. i bought it to torture myself. sewell was hit/stripped from behind inside the bills’ 35-yard line. i think there was a minute and a half left at the time. a few short runs, we could have tied it, and we had the momentum. elway was knocked out of the game, but not before he was hit/stripped by cornelius bennet at our own 5-yard line, leading to the only buffalo td.

after an off year, this wast our last hurrah with that group. we went pretty heavy with the defense that year, under wade phillips, and played a masterpiece of a game defensively. the k-gun was putting up like 40 points a game that season, and we held them to basically nothing. we were running the 3-4, lots of movement, blitzed like mad, and buffalo didn’t have an answer. they actually looked afraid and confused.
but alas, treadwell did miss 3 field goals, and then the sewell thing at the end sealed our fate. i actually thought this team had a chance in the sb, only because our d was the best it had been in the era, and wade was a brilliant coordinator. i believe he parlayed this performance into the head coaching job the next season, after shanny informed us he wasn’t ready to be a hc again. great team, painful loss, but i’m glad there’s people out there that remember this team in ‘91.

this was the season we beat houston in the playoffs 26-24, in “the drive” fashion. they pummeled us in the regular season 42-14, by the way. the oilers were the only team to score more than 20 points on us ALL SEASON. the bills game ended up 10-7, with no elway. this team had a shot, believe me, but much like karlis, treadwell did us in. we better find a good kicker quick, i’m starting to get worried about that now. here’s the d:

DEFENSE
LE 91 Warren Powers
NT 71 Greg Kragen
RE 90 Ron Holmes
LO 73 Simon Fletcher
LI 77 Karl Mecklenburg
RI 51 Mike Croel
RO 56 Michael Brooks
LC 34 Tyrone Braxton
RC 24 Wymon Henderson
FS 27 Steve Atwater
SS 49 Dennis Smith

by davecheffy on May 31, 2008 12:53 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

oh...

i forgot jim turner and his 2-3 misses in the ‘77 sb. great kicker, awful game

by davecheffy on May 31, 2008 1:02 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Torain?

Zappa – We chose Torain based on what the scouting team considered to be his perfect skill set for and familiarity with the one-cut system. I can’t speak about Omon or Choice since I liked both and was surprised at Torain. However, the Goodman’s have been refining their analysis tools for what they consider to be the ‘right’ running back for our system, and seem to know their business.

They did well on Young, and I was encouraged at Shanahan’s recent comment that “There is a big difference between years 1 and 2”, as well as Young’s gain of 15+ lbs of muscle and his admittedly high expectations of his coming year. Perhaps what they saw in Torain will give us the thunder to Young’s lightning. I’m open on Hall – camp will tell us how or if he has matured and developed. What do you think?

O'Brien's Law states that Murphy was an optimist.

by Emmett Smith on May 31, 2008 3:48 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm thinking Hall ends up losing out to Young...

I dont see us keeping both guys beyond this next season. Shanny brings in new running backs each year in his never ending quest for the next “TD”. Tell me of one two year stretch where we kept all of the same running backs on the team…never? lol

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
The Quest ~ TSG 5/19/08

by Tim Lynch on May 31, 2008 11:03 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another agreement!

: )

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jun 2, 2008 6:28 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dead on

I ran into a strange stat – Scout.com ranked Hillis as the 78th player avvailable in this years draft. Value pick or what?

Even stranger – Eddie Royal was ranked 83rd.

O'Brien's Law states that Murphy was an optimist.

by Emmett Smith on Jun 1, 2008 6:04 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

if you like the rankings, try this...

...from “sporting news draft”-may issue, based on position rank. special mentions included:

anthony allridge-#12 rb
ryan clady-#1 tackle, best pass blocker
peyton hillis-#1 fb, best receiver
brett kern-#1 punter
spencer larsen-#11 ilb, sleeper pick
kory lichtensteiger-#2 center, best run blocker, on the rise pick
carlton powell-#17 dt
eddie royal-#12, on the rise pick, best undersized player list, #3 top return men list
ryan torain-#30 rb, #1 priority free-agent list
jack williams-#17 cb, sleeper pick, best undersize player list
wesley woodyard-#24 olb

not bad, considering some of the injuries here. josh barrett is nowhere to be found. i think he was the one who took a 2-year hiatus, and also was injured. must have slipped through the cracks, i guess. looks like a solid draft, though

by davecheffy on Jun 2, 2008 12:41 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Great stats, Dave

Thanks

O'Brien's Law states that Murphy was an optimist.

by Emmett Smith on Jun 2, 2008 1:01 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!
Start posting about the Broncos »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ah-64_apache_helicopter_small
Ryan McBean, the difference maker?
Hpim2076_small
UPON FURTHER REVIEW - The Chargers Part 2
The-big-lebowski_small
The Dude Abides...It's Charger Limerick Time...Again
Milehighstadium_small
Terror Alert in Chicago
Small
Understanding the NFL Running Game

Recent FanPosts

Sao_paulo_fc-maior_small
Chris Simms will start for the Broncos (Chris Mortensen )
Logo_alternate_large3jpeg_small
WTH Did Our 13-3 Chant Go??
Rod_smith_small
Why so nervous??
Clay-davis2_small
Is Anybody There? We will win on Sunday - here's why
Broncos-1024x768_small
The Art of "The Deep Ball"
Wall1_small
First Upset of the week!
Small
Should Orton Start If Healthy?
Walter_drawn_small
Momentum: The Potential for Potential
Small
How short the leash?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

MHR Radio

SPONSORS

Web Stuff


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

Cyborg_small Jeremy Bolander

Asst. Head Coach

Mhr_small Steve Nichols

Tahoetim_small Tim Lynch

J_elway_870111_640_small Douglas A. Lee

Plato_bust_small Emmett Smith

Denver-broncos-button_small Ted Bartlett

The-big-lebowski_small TJ Johnson

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk