MHR University - Some Tricks for Reading a Defense
As a former defensive coordinator, it pains me to share how those evil offensive coordinators go after the noble defenses in football. But heck, we're all friends here, right?
There are two levels of breaking down a defense. The first level is tactical. This is looking at indivdual players to determine intent. I'm not going into this aspect today. A lot has been written and discussed about this level, and I'll save it for another day. In simple terms, a tactical read of a defense includes things like a QB or OLman reading a blitz. This might be the result of a LB cheating up to the LOS (line of scrimmage). It might be a clue from game film that when a certain player does something small (like the way his left foot is turned, or the angle at which his arm is bent) unintentionaly signals what he is going to do. Coordinators on the same team watch for these "tells" so they can inform their counterpart of the weakness.
But I want to get away from the player level reads, and clue you in on coordinator level reads (strategic reads). The booth is looking at pictures, as is the coach, the OFF coordinator, as well as the QB and his position coach. Why? You see it on TV all of the time, and now we'll tear down the mystery.
Read on...
Many of the strategic level reads done by the offense can't be done in real time. With a tactical read ("strategic" and "tactical" are my own terms to simplify the material) an offense gets immediate benefit. They know who is blitzing, or who is covering who. But the advantage is short lived, and lasts for the play.
The wider read is more difficult, but pays dividends for several plays or for the entire game. In some cases, a good read can last for several games between division opponents until the other team wises up.
One example of coordinators getting a read is using "man in motion". There are many reasons to put a man in motion, and a future University article will probably go in that direction. Sometimes a MIM is used to place a TE where he can block a rush (based on a tactical read), or to trick a team into shifting the defense to the wrong place. Maybe the TE is moving out to catch instead of block. In the case of a receiver, it may be to take advantage of a weakness in a defense. When RBs shift (either th HB or FB) it may signal an elaborate run blocking set up, or a switch between pass blocking and going out for a screen. But a MIM is not always what it appears to be! Sometimes it is used to get a read on the defense.
One of the favorite tricks in the bag of an advanced OC is to use MIM to get a read on the defense. Consider some of these reads that one can gain from a motion.
1. If a player goes in motion, and his "cover" doesn't move with him, the cover is in zone. Continuing the motion across the field, the motion player can also force other players on the defense to stand or move and clue the coordinator into who zones and who doesn't on certain plays.
2. A MIM also tells an OC if the defense is using MAN-1 or MAN-2 coverage. This has nothing to do with double coverage, and sometimes an uninformed sportswriter makes the mistake of thinking MAN-2 means such. In fact, there are two ways a defensive coordinator uses man coverage. Let's explore this in more detail.
Man-1 is a simple "man on man" coverage. If my TE motions to the other side of the line, his cover (let's say it's the SS) follows him across all of the way. AH! But if the defensive coordinator uses MAN-2, it means the defensive players switch off coverage as the TE moves across.
This is rarer and more advanced, but works for some schemes and situations. Let's say the TE is in motion from the strong side to the weakside. As he moves across, the strong safety follows him to a point. When the TE reaches the SAM, perhaps the SS drops back into zone, and the SAM now follows (and covers) the TE. As they pass the MLB, the SAM moves back to his original assignment, and covers (let's say) the FB, and the MLB now move with and covers the TE. The defensive players call verbaly to assure that everyone knows when the assignment is handed off.
The read you can get from determining MAN-1 versus MAN-2 are huge, but take some time to develop on the sideline. Perhaps the verbal handoff in a MAN-2 scheme is weak between a couple of defensive players, and the OC can advise the QB to time the snap count to "snap" at the precise moment the two (poorly coordinated) defensive players switch the assignment. Also, the read can help the coordinator figure out exactly what kind of plays and assignments come from certain formations in certain "down and distance" situations.
There are many other applications, but those are just some of the reads you can get just from a man on motion. Yes, sometimes a MIM is called for the sole purpose of getting a read, and not for an advantage on the play.
What other tricks are used? One trick used by coordinators involves using game time photos to determine the shape and size of a zone used by a defensive player. Guess what? Human beings playing in zone do not zone in a perfect circle or square, nor do they do they zone for a perfect number of yards specified by the play. No two players zone exactly alike. Want a bizzare example of just how deep this "signature zone" goes?
At one of the coaching seminars our coaches flew to, we saw a college level coordinator (not even a pro level guy folks) show us a film. It showed professional defensive players (DBs and LBs) in zone, but the body was "whited out" by computer. The film showed multiple plays where the player kept his zone or went after a target. Based on the player's moves, a computer generated line appeared that showed the player's zone limits. Get this: there were coaches in the room able to read who the player was based on the shape of the zone. This was shown with several players as examples. Another facinating point was that the same player could be shown, but using entirely different example plays (even plays he ran with a different team). The shape of the zone remained the same, and unique to the player.
The point of the demonstration was interesting. Apparently, you can't really teach a guy to change much about how he zones an area in terms of size and shape. But I took something else form the demonstration. Plays can be designed to take advantage of a player's zone limits. After the class, I asked the gentleman doing the presentation if this was the case. "No, not at the college level", he said. "But the pros sure as hell do it".
How's a defensive coach to adjust? That's for another article. For now, a few quick pointers would include
- Excellent execution, regardless of what the opponent knows.
- Sending "false tells".
- Change the playbook every now and then (Listening Coyer?)
- Ask the OC to do reads on your defense when he has time (ask the head coach to make him!)
- Use (are you ready for this?) tricks of your own to read the offense!
Entire books could be written on how offenses read entire plays. Unfortunately, there isn't a wide enough market for the books, or enough time and space for a single MHR-U article. I've just given a few examples here of reads the pros use. The HS level I was at clearly wasn't this in depth.
But the next time you see the QB looking at those photos, you'll know he isn't looking at the same formations over and over again. He's looking at a series of photos from a single play, and seeing how the defense runs the play. There are typically marks on the photos from the coaching staff of things picked up on for the QB to be aware of. These are the strategic level reads that have been generated over several plays (or games) that show tendancies (soft reads) or consistent actions (hard reads) of the other team.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Have any questions about football Xs and Os? This is the place to ask! No question is too simple. We're a big family at MHR, and we're glad to help anyone learn more about the game.
In fact, in addition to Xs and Os, we have writers and members with knowledge in salary cap rules, team history, and even medicine (related to player injuries) or law (when a League legal issue arises). In short, this is a friendly and informed community. If you're not already a member, consider registering. It's free, and your information doesn't get shared with junk mailers. We'd love to hear from you!
8 recs |
24 comments
Comments
Zone shapes
Wow, great article. Quick question- if particular players have their own unique zone-shape, are there attempts made by defensive coordinators to realign particular players on the field such that their zones will better cover a particular area. I suppose this is a similar question to asking about a players range in coverage, but with relatively fixed zone-shapes, you’d obviously want to have players on the field that are able to cover particular “hotspots” as well as possible (i.e. the sidelines during a 2-minute drill, etc.). Any thoughts on that?
by MGM on Jul 1, 2008 10:10 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Here's what I think.
The concept of overlaying zones specific to a player is a pro level technique. Even the colleges don’t apply it (or that’s what I was told). So I’m shooting from the hip here.
I know that offenses at the pro level use routes to take advantage of individual zone areas, and it’s reasonable to assume that the defensive coordinators adjust alignments. But I don’t think that this is the case. When I watch a pro game I don’t see much change in where DBs and LBs line up (outside of scheme and formation considerations). My guess is that the aplication for defenses is to know the advantages and disadvatages of each player’s zone, and to adjust play calls accordingly. It may also be a consideration in selecting players for the team (based on the area of coverage, and the player’s ability to move within that zone, such as backpeddling). An otherwise great looking player may have a singular zone that has too many blind spots.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jul 1, 2008 12:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
would Belichick be considering zone-shapes in his various subsitution packages?
HT, Thanks again for the insight. Do you think there’s a possibility that Belichick may consider zone-shapes when he comes up with his subsitution packages for the week? Since he seems to vary his defensive packages and alignments based on the opponent, do you think it’s possible that he is also scheming zones based on the particular offensive opponents he’ll be facing and the routes that they tend to run? I’m also wondering this that would make some sense of the Broncos consistent success against the Belichick-run Patriots defenses since Shanahan generally models his gameplan for the opponent, and less for his own players tendencies (i.e. his offensive gameplan against the colts last year that worked so well for one half). I’m sure I’m reading too much into this idea of zone-shapes but it really is an intriguing concept. Thanks again for any other insight you can offer on this idea.
by MGM on Jul 2, 2008 3:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My guesses.
I really think the use of measuring the shape and sizes of zones are for the purpose of offenses planning routes to take advantage of those limitations. Two examples.
1. By playing close to the edge of the zone, you might get a split second of indecision from the defensive player that goes with deciding whether to go after the principal (or target), or to stay in the zone.
2. By purposefully avoiding the zones (or “splitting them” if you go between two players who aren’t overlapping) you might get a free area for passes (such as the infamous “seam routes” against cover two systems).
Again, I don’t know of any teams using this on the defensive side for any purpose, but my knowledge of the zone mapping system that was demonstrated was limited to the one presentation that I saw. The presentation focused on coaching, and the point was that your players zone how they want, and you can’t think they are following a perfect shape / perfect radius. It wasn’t so much because there is a practical application below the pro level. One of the two guys doing this class (a college offensive guy) told me afterwards (though) that the pros “sure as Hell” use the technology to exploit defenses. I didn’t find out if defenses utilize it also.
In terms of taking advantage of the Pats, I attribute our good record to three areas.
1. Shanahan is more of a genius that we give him credit for. Without Elway, he still manages to gain double digit winning records most years. Belichick faces the best and the brightest coaches in the country, but Shanahan is perhaps the best mind he faces.
2. Oddly, in terms of systems, we don’t match well against the type of 3-4 that the Pats use ( the Fairbanks-Bullough system). But our adjustments are sound, and our defense is an excellent match-up against the Pats (pressuring Brady from the inside out with rushes up the middle, something most teams don’t execute as well. A nice reason for 1 gappers in the middle).
3. Recently it was reported that the cheating scandal of the Pats showed that the team had information on all of its oponents to some degree. All, except the Denver Broncos, who go to greater lengths than everyone else to cover up and change sideline signals. (FWIW, the scandal involved reading defenses, but Belichick’s claim to fame amongst coach watchers like me is his ability to adjust defenses, not offenses so much. Thus the “cheating” doesn’t take away from his defensive brilliance, even if I fault the man for being a cheat).
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jul 2, 2008 4:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Read!
Articles like this are why I love MHR. I can’t get enought of your articles HT. Fill me I am your sponge O wise one. :) Seriously great article thanks for taking the time to edumacate us. I look forward to hearing about the tactical side.
by ThorpeBroncosfan on Jul 1, 2008 10:16 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll get to it.
I know there is some discussion at the broadcast level and even the blog forum level about tactical considerations. Many of our members who have played HS football probably have a good grasp of what a QB or OLman looks for. We don’t hear as much about coaching level considerations.
Still, many of us haven’t played HS ball, and many of us that did played on defense or elsewhere on the offense. So I’ll make sure to touch on the issue. I also hope to do a future story on more considerations for reading defenses (and, of course, reading offenses!)
Thanks for the kind words.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jul 1, 2008 12:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent Piece
Thank-you Sensei for teaching me. I am learning so much more about football and much of it is thanks to you and MHR. I was watching the Bengals-Broncos game from Christmas two years ago and actually observed a Man-2 coverage in action without even knowing what it was. Here is a quick stat they mentioned in the game. Only two rookie quarterbacks have thrown for multiple touchdowns in their first four games. Dan Marino and Jay Cutler, not bad company our gunslinger finds himself in.
by unkown on Jul 1, 2008 10:53 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks you unk
Cutler is something special, even with untreated diabetes. Imagine what he can do healthy! This is going to be an exciting next few years…
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jul 1, 2008 12:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another great class at the MHR University!
Thorpe makes a great point.
Articles like this are why I love MHR.
I think he speaks for every member of this site and most trolls as well. Thank you HT!
OK, now I expose myself to get blasted by all blind Cutler-lovers. Every game we see Manning pouring over the pics with the OC. Almost the same thing with Brady. Both are usually engaged with the rest of the offense the entire time the defense is on the field. Jay sits on the bench with his ball cap pulled over his eyes and looks like he is about ready to doze off!! Why is that? I’m sure it is not because he doesn’t care.I like the fact he doesn’t get rattled, but shouldn’t he be more involved with the strategic reads? I don’t know. I am not saying I don’t like Cutler, I honestly don’t know why he isn’t more animated and involved on the sideline.
What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us. - Emerson
by firstfan on Jul 1, 2008 12:07 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Each QB does it different
I dont ever remember seeing Elway pour over polaroids either. That does not mean they dont do it. Its just when the cameras get them. I remember the big thing here in SD was LT sitting on the bench during the 2nd half of the AFC title game. But according to the players he was sitting on the bench during defensive series and was up rooting on the offense. The camera can manipulate how the viewer see what really going on. I dont need to see a QB animated on the sideline. Thats me though. But then again I played QB in school and I was never animated, either
by broncfanstuckinsd on Jul 1, 2008 12:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also...
Cutler was probably exhausted most of the games he played last year, especially in the later part of the year, due to the Diabetes. Also, I’d be curious to know if Manning and Brady spent that much time with the pictures in their first and second seasons? It may have been a little too much for Cutler to take at that point in his career.
by UnarmingMermaid on Jul 1, 2008 12:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
These are both good answers.
Thanks. I considered the diabetes angle, but was waiting to hear what others said.
What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us. - Emerson
by firstfan on Jul 1, 2008 12:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good points by everybody!
Here are a few thoughts. I’m guessing of course.
One is that Cutler was just dead tired from his illness. Who knows? But more likely, I think the staff doesn’t want to burden the kid too early. Right now the decisions are made for Cutler from higher up. Nalen calls a lot of the blocking schemes, and Mike calls in the plays. Rarely does a young QB run the offense. Right now our hero needs to focus on the game plan, and a few of the bliz packages and DB coverages that may get thrown at him.
As he grows, I think he’ll get more chances to read OC level analysis. The coordinator will probably sit with him to explain what the staff is picking up from the opposition. Remember that this is a multi-person job. No coordinator or coach (or even QB) is going to pick up everything at game speed. It gets filtered to the OC, and he takes the responsibility for reading it correctly and getting it to the QB. Whether he sits down and shares it (like with Manning, who is the sharpest QB mind in the game), or just passes on what to do depends on the experience and brightness of the QB.
Keep in mind that Cutler is considered one of the smartest young QBs in the game. He’ll make the jump from managing to running a system in no time. Remember too that Shanahan doesn’t hog the spotlight. He’s smart enough to let QBs loose to make their own choices. Recall that he let Elway loose after years of being “dictated to” by the Reeves’ approach. He’s also sharp enough to take away the spotlight (turning Plummer from a gunslinger to a manager, which helped us get to a Conference championship game).
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jul 1, 2008 12:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks HT
See, just reading this makes me more knowledgeable and therefore a better fan.
What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us. - Emerson
by firstfan on Jul 1, 2008 1:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Better,
...but always First!
: )
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jul 1, 2008 1:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Points, all
I was thinking about that while reading the article too. I’ll be curious to see what the switch from Heimerdinger to Bates will present for Cutler’s analysis on the sideline and general look of the offense on the field. I would guess that with a younger guy (Bates) working with a QB that he has a very strong rapport with, that they will analyze more together that Heimerdinger did.
Manning calls many of his own plays and changes many plays at the LOS and the fact that he’s always ‘hitting the books’ on the sideline is absolutely necessary. It’s obvious that he could be an OC in the NFL if he wanted to right now.
As for Brady, although he has more rings, he also has a control-oriented coach and a young OC (youngest in the NFL) with whom he has a great rapport with. So, I would then assume that Brady is reviewing reads and talking with his OC back and forth about what it means, much like Cutler and Bates may do in 2008.
by super7 on Jul 1, 2008 2:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What stands out in my mind
is that Cutler, almost from the day he was drafted, has been “hitting the books.” I think one thing Shanny loves about him is that he’s thinking football year round. Whatever his demeanor on the sideline, I don’t think there’s any question that he’s like Manning in wanting to know all the details and nuances of offensive and defensive play and being willing to apply himself to that end. Once he masters not only the Broncos’ offense but the various things defenses will throw at him, he’ll be awesome. Speaking of awesome, I loved that bit about different defenders having different shaped zones. The things I’m going to be looking for as I watch games this year . . .
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Jul 1, 2008 9:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've said it before...
...I’ve never learned so much about football from any other source. I think I’ll be watching games differently from now on. I guess you can teach an old dog new tricks.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on Jul 2, 2008 11:16 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm an old dog,
and I learn a lot of new tricks at MHR everyday. There’s a lot about football (especially the pro level) and the Broncos I learn about every time I come to MHR. I’m glad to share, but I get a lot more than I give.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jul 2, 2008 11:37 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow.
Great lesson. I loved your trick by using motion to see if they are in zone or man to man coverage.
"Hey Raiders fans!!! If you leave now you can beat traffic!"
-Rod Smith
by GarretBarnes on Jul 2, 2008 12:30 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Phenomenal topic HT
I really enjoyed the read and don’t find that I have any questions that can’t wait until I am watching a game with you in person. Being padewan from afar can sometimes be tougher than it needs to be. :)
Thought for a future article (I may even have mentioned it before):
Coach Watch: featuring David Hoosierhoff. HT’s take on the great coaches, past and present, broncos and non-broncos.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Jul 2, 2008 5:55 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
There's a thought!
Though, you’ll forgive me if I don’t take the Hoff approach. Eek Gad!
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jul 3, 2008 12:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't
watch film or highlights without using HT’s knowledge. Kudos!
Think where man's glory most begins and ends,
And let me say my glory was I had such friends
-Yeats-
by Emmett Smith on Jul 4, 2008 12:39 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Bear!
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jul 4, 2008 12:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



































