Mile High Report: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's College Football Week 12 Alphabetical

The '08 Schedule Overview (Pt. 1)

Denver's schedule is considered an easy one, but Denver is also a team in transition.  The transition includes a change in defensive systems, and a new approach to team building.

The team building approach is perhaps the most intriguing move.  The Broncos have thrown out the model of trading up in the draft and seeking high profile FAs in favor of seeking depth, quantity (for roster competition), value, and character.

One area where this is made clear is the receiver position.  Marshall returns as the easy choice for #1 receiver.  But competition is stiff for the #2 position.  Colbert was brought in and priced to be the #2, and has been turning heads in early practices.  But D. Jackson was brought in with a very impressive resume, and the fight is on!  Not to be outdone, Royal was the #2 draft pick (intended to be a STs return ace) and has been lighting up the practices as well.  The story doesn't end there.

Stokley is likely to keep his slot position, and that still leaves KC veteran Parker and current returner / speed man Martinez to compete for a chance to even make the team.  Seven players at WR, and all of them with a chance to make the team.

Despite the positions of strength and depth, Denver also faces some questions.  Are any Denver fans really comfortable with the kicking / punting situation?  Has the biggest weakness of last year's team (DT) been addressed?

Let's take a look at the Broncos in transition while they face a schedule they might be able to manage.  If Denver can pull together an identity early in the season, they might get ahead of the curve and manage a major jump this season.  At worst, this year can launch the young players in place into victory in '09.

Read on... 

Star-divide

The first thing to notice in Denver's schedule is that 3 of the first 4 games are against division rivals.  This presents a potential problem.  Denver is a team with new faces (much like last year), and a team that is shifting in its defensive identity.  Denver needs to hold its own early in the season, until the learning curve catches up and the team plays as one.  But with three critical games so early, Denver doesn't have much time to gel.

SD won't have this problem, as they are an established and effective team.  KC may have to operate on a curve with an influx of talent from the draft, but the weakness at QB may keep them from being effective.  oak (never capitalized by the author) has brought in a lot of talent (and perhaps spent themselves into Salary Cap Hell two years from now), but faces the same issues of needing time to gel a team together.

Noraiders_medium 

Looking at the first game (DEN at oak), Denver faces two issues.  Denver's weak run defense faces an effective (and even improved) RB group that runs behind a zone block defense.  Denver also faces a good looking CB tandem.  The game is MNF, and is the rivalry that Denver fans look forward to the most.  It is also an away game.

 

Some factors play to Denver.  One is oak's weak run defense versus Denver's run offense.  We'll save the breakdown for the actual game prep, but for now let's call it a wash.  Denver will practice against the zone block in two preseason games (HOU and GB) at nearly game speed.  Watching these two pre-season games will indicate how prepared for oak the Broncos front 7 are.  (As always, look for player performance in the pre-season; ignore the scoreboard and playcalling).

This is a high stakes game.  The loser starts the season with a losing record and a negative check in the division race for a playoff spot.

Sd_medium

via i9.photobucket.com

As if the first game wasn't big enough, Denver next faces another division rival, and arguably one of the top teams in the NFL.  Denver faces another elite CB tandem, and an offense that features two future hof's (likewise, not capitalized) in TE Gates and RB LT.  WR Chambers is not an elite force, but solid enough to keep teams from planning against Gates and LT.

Denver will likely switch tactics this year, and go back to classic Broncos defense.  Blitz Rivers with the Show Blitz System (run by Slowik) and rely on its on elite CBs.  Denver will either try to keep the SD offense off the field with an effective power running game, or get into a shootout with Cutler at the helm.  Cutler should build on an impressive start (now that he has more experience, and now that his diabetes is treated) with a deep and effective stable of WRs and TEs.

Neworleanssaintslogo_medium

via www.crabapples.net

The Broncos now turn to a non-conference opponent.  While many fans focus on big names at RB or depth at CB, I see a team with an effective TE group.  Blocker Campbell's return should aid the running game (he was injured last year) and spring the better known players there.  Johnson and Miller are both effective TEs that don't get as much notice as they should.  This game will be a major test for our SAM linebacker and strong safety.

And yet, Denver has two very effective TEs.  Graham is our version of Campbell, and Scheffler is our version of Johnson.  Denver also has a better (and deeper) class at CB. 

Like Denver, NO has questions at DT.  They have a returning (injury) playmaker, as well as draft pick Ellis.  They may be the top team we face in the NFC South rotation.

Chiefs_20vs_20broncos_20logo_medium

via www.wildbillschiefs.com

And now, only four games into the season, Denver faces the third division rival.  While KC is a team that made some solid moves in the draft, they have a much deeper hole to climb out of.  They are rebuilding, and doing a solid job of it.  The key missing ingredient remains a QB.  For now, KC is building evenly and hoping to get help at QB (perhaps in '09).  It's a long term approach, but should pay dividends in a few years.  In the meantime, Denver should do well here.

KC is going to have a new offensive system (emphasis on power runs to set up the pass) and a blitz version of the cover 2.  If KC can get a win, it will be behind a dominant rushing attack.  If Denver can slow the run, their balance in every other aspect of the game will mean a win for the blue and orange.

This game will be a major test of our DTs and our MLB.

 

(Photo courtesy of Buc 'Em)

Another team with QB troubles, the big debate in TB is perhaps "Do we want Favre?"  There are some match-up issues to look at, but here again we look favorable.

061029_jacksonville_jaguars_logo_medium

via www2.whdh.com

Here is a game that should be worth watching.  I really like the way JAX has built themselves up, and the team is on the way to challenging INDY for the AFC South Crown shortly.  I like the Jags at QB, RB, and DL the most, and think there will be a lot to write about just before the game.  I very much like the balance on the DL, as I expect the Jags DL to equaly stop the run and rush the passer against most teams.

This should be a very close run affair.  At this point Denver will almost be halfway through the season.  If Denver looks competitive for a playoff spot, this is the game that will show just how good Denver is.

Patriots_medium

via www.onlinesports.com

Shanahan manages to slay the dragon more often than not, but the Patriots are arguably the top team in the NFL (if judged on the nember of recent SB appearances and wins).  It's another MNF game, and another away one at that.

It's a no lose situation.  If Denver loses, no one will be shocked.  But if the game is close, or if Denver wins, folks will take note.

Dolphinsfl_medium

via www.nflfanstore.com

We'll take a closer look at this team nearer to game day.  But for now, most football fans are going to call this a likely Denver victory against a 1-15 team.  (Quick, how many Dolphins can you name on offense?)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Halfway through the season and the toughest games out of the way.  If Denver can hold their own through the first eight, the likely improvement will help the team flourish against the remaining 8 teams.

Should be wins - I feel very good about the KC and MIA games.  TB may be a darkhorse for an upset loss, but I doubt we drop this game. 

Too early too call - JAX could go either way.  I think we are a much better team than NO, but they present some match-up issues.  oak is a terrible team, and has been for several years, but may benefit from some new blood.  I'm not taking them for granted just yet. 

Looks tough - The NE and SD games look tough on paper.  Not out of reach, but very tough.

We could easily be at anywhere from 7-1 to 4-4 at this point.  The schedule gets ven easier in pt. 2..... 

Poll
Denver wins how many games in the first half of the season?
7 or 8
2 votes
6
22 votes
5
31 votes
4 or less
12 votes

67 votes | Poll has closed

This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR

0 recs  |  Comment 26 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

.500 should do the trick.

I think that if the Broncos can manage 4-4 thru there first half of the season, then they should be set up nicely for a playoff run. However, 4-4 leaves little room for error in the second half…5-3 would really be looking pretty good (and allow for the game off the Broncos like to take now and again).

by UnarmingMermaid on Jul 14, 2008 9:58 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

I think we manage better than 4-4, but we still have plenty of room for a good season even with 4. I think we get 5 or 6.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 14, 2008 11:09 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

However

I dont like saying the uncertanty of the RB situation is overblown. Now it has been a long time since the Broncos rotated Rb’s. Too me the OL situation may have changed but not the system. Last year with an injured revolving door of an OL the Broncos still averaged 4.6 YPC. Plus they ran for 1957 yards. Also I would not say Denver is going to a new system as much as I would say they are going back to an old system. I do think the transition will be less painfull that a lot of the “experts” are saying. Plus I do believe the Broncos could really surprise the NHL and jump out to a 7-1 start or be as weak as 4-4. The Homefield is the key. 5 of the first 8 are in Denver. That leaves road games at Oak, KC and NE. It is not impossible to say Denver could be 3-0 or 2-1 in those games. The 3 biggest games in the 1st half are SD, JAX, and @NE. Denver should be at the worst 2-1 in those games. I believe Denver will be 5-0 at home and 2-1 on the road. Burt anything can happen. I also remember that Sd is a slow starter and remember Phylis is coming off knee surgery so nobody can honestly say he is gonna be 100% so that game should be a Bronco win no matter what. Remeber 41-3 should be the cry from Dove Valley

by broncfanstuckinsd on Jul 14, 2008 11:55 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Good points!

While I agree we are going back to an old system, much of our front seven is new to it (an interesting exception is Niko K2). I think there will be an adjustment period, but not nearly as severe as last year.

That leaves road games at oak, KC and NE. It is not impossible to say Denver could be 3-0 or 2-1 in those games.

I think KC is a likely win, and the odds favor NE. oak is the pivotal game here, and critical for all the reasons I listed in the article as well as the point you make (these are the 3 road games). I think we go 2-1 or 1-2.

I think the three critical games are oak, JAX, and NO. I say this because my (very premature) look at system and player match-ups makes these three game near toss-ups. (We have a slight edge against NO, oak has homefield and talent, but several weaknesses, and JAX has a good system match against us).

I know that Phylis is coming off of surg, but I’m hearing he looks like 100% by start of season. Besides, I think the SD strength isn’t Rivers at all, but the Chambers / Gates / LT trio.

Last,

Plus I do believe the Broncos could really surprise the NHL and…

I agree. The National Hockey League should really be shocked. If Denver takes the ice, WATCH OUT!

: )

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 14, 2008 12:38 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice catch...

...but nothing at all wrong with what you said. It WOULD be a shock to the NHL. Heck, even when you make a typo you still get it right! You rock!

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 14, 2008 1:08 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just have

a real good feeling on this team. Plus I maybe truly reaching by thinking they could be 7-1. But Shanny has started out 5-1 four of the past 5 seasons. So its not too far fetched.

by broncfanstuckinsd on Jul 14, 2008 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

SD
I know that Phylis is coming off of surg, but I’m hearing he looks like 100% by start of season. Besides, I think the SD strength isn’t Rivers at all, but the Chambers / Gates / LT trio.

The early word on Rivers is that he looks really good and should be 100% by then. The Broncos catch the Chargers at an opportune moment though, as of now Hardwick©, Stephen Cooper (LB) and possibly Gates will be out. Given that and the fact that the Broncos are at home, I’m a little worried about that game. Jacksonville, NE, NO and SD are all going to tough games as I see it. Jacksonville is going to be the real acid test for your defensive line.

"He's doing everything a receiver would do except catch the ball." Mike Shanahan

by Brian (DaBolts) on Jul 14, 2008 3:07 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

could be but . . .

I wanst sold on Jax last year and they have done nothing to change my mind. That team is devoid of WR’s and playmakers in the passing game. Heck SD should have won that game last year against them.
I hear the same things about Rivers also, but I heard the same things about Culpepper also after his knee. What I am trying to say is that the normal recupperation time for that type of knee surgery is 1 year. So to expect Rivers to come back and be the same moron as he was is kind of being overly hopefull. There are 2 things that are part of his rehab, its phyiscal and mental. carson Palmer said it was longer for him mentally to come back than phyiscally. Plus I think Palmer is stronger mentally that Rivers.
Do you think Cooper gets his jon back from Derek Smith?

by broncfanstuckinsd on Jul 14, 2008 3:20 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

They sold me

with their games in Pittsburgh. They are one dimensional, but its a real good dimension. They have a great O-line and Gerrard seems to come through in the clinch. You could be right on Rivers, but I’m more worried about Gates toe, they say those can be weird injuries that players never fully recover from.

Cooper is a stud as well as the field general on defense; he gets his job back period. If somebody shines while he is away, they will take Matt Wilhelm’s ILB position. I’ve heard that the coaches are so impressed with Anthony Waters, he may well get the nod instead of Derek Smith. If Waters has a great preseason that may cement it.

"He's doing everything a receiver would do except catch the ball." Mike Shanahan

by Brian (DaBolts) on Jul 14, 2008 3:57 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

true enuff

I heard an interview (either 1360 or 1090) where the though was Cooper might have hurt himself within the organization with the suspension and then being with Keil on that night. And the fact that Smith wanted to be here so bad. (Now to think of it it was Denny Green saying this). I did forget about Gates toe. As a football fan I hope its ok, as a Bronco fan I hope it bothers him only twice this year.
On Jax, I think with an entire offseason I do think the NFL will catch up to him. No predominatly running Qb has ever excelled in back to back seasons (RE:Vick, Bobby Douglss). Plus Jax should have lost to Pitt. The holding penalty that wasnt called. Plus the Jags blew that big lead.

by broncfanstuckinsd on Jul 14, 2008 5:01 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Setting aside (for a moment) how good JAX is or isn't...

...I think that from a scheme perspective they match up with us very well. I’ll cover this in detail in the week preceeding the game, but of all the “toss-up” games this one concerns me the most.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 14, 2008 5:12 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its just my thinking

That a truly one demensional offense cant thrive from year to year. If the threat of the pass inst there I dont believe a team like that can continue to win. I could be wrong however

by broncfanstuckinsd on Jul 14, 2008 5:53 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Briefly,

I think that JAX is tough as heck in the trenches, and plays a smash mouth type of system. They played tough against PITT (playing them at their own game), and are effective at covering possession receivers (read – Marshall, Stokley, Scheffler). They can bring pressure on the defensive ends and off their OLBs, and can eat clock with the power rush (little need to pass effectively). With a one-two punch, they can wear down an already suspect middle of the Denver defensive line.

I just think it’s a terrific match-up. Our strength on defensive (an elite and deep group of CBs) means nothing to a team unconcerned about frequent passing. I’m not calling this a loss by any stretch; I’m just saying that there is a lot here to look into before declareing the game a likely win or loss.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 14, 2008 9:39 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the injury heads up, DB. You still ought to get that website. We need more intellect and passion

Especially in SD :-)

Think where man's glory most begins and ends,
And let me say my glory was I had such friends
-Yeats-

by Emmett Smith on Jul 14, 2008 9:38 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

4-4 Seems About Right...

OAK - W<br />v. SD - L<br />v. NO - L<br /> KC – W
v. TB – W
v. JAX – L
@ NE – L
v. MIA – W

Those are some tough home game, facing three teams on most people’s Super Bowl short list! We also get our two weaker divisional games on the road early on and that certainly makes them tougher. I could see come of those L’s being W’s, but some of those W’s could just as easily become L’s, so I’m comfortable with the .500 prediction.

Please check out my blog at http://thefulldeck.blogspot.com/ , now redesigned and recommited!

by ejruiz on Jul 14, 2008 12:38 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I think your prediction...

...is the worst case scenario I have, but the wins and losses are where I would have them. In your scenario, I think we can perhaps pull off wins from oak, NO, and or JAX.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 14, 2008 1:07 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am a fan NOT worried about either kickers!

Hey Guys,
Elam SUCKED when he first came into the NFL. Paelscu has a big leg and will do fine. Prater WILL miss some kicks, but Elam said he is a good kicker and will get better…..and he has a HUGE leg.
I think we over-react to the kicker thing because Elam got us out of trouble last year. I feel with a better offense and line, then we should punch in TD’s and not FG’s….and this takes away reliance on a great kicker.
WE are a young team. We expect mistakes from all our new players and that includes kickers.
We will be fine if we understand mistakes will be made by our young players across the board.
Peace!

by boydy2669 on Jul 14, 2008 1:23 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with giving young guys a chance.

But the kicker and punter positions are very hard to measure before an NFL start. Great players in college can bust in the NFL, and busts in college can light up in the pros. It’s always a very frightening thing to get a new kicker or punter if he isn’t a top notch FA. (My love for Elam isn’t even so much because he bailed us out a few times last year, but because of his record tying 63 yd FG).

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 14, 2008 1:42 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with broncfanstuckinsd regarding our defensive changes. We’re not changing defenses so much as returning to what’s familiar. There will a learning curve, while players adjust to the novelty of playing together (for the first time in some cases), but there aren’t going to be the type of changes that require players to completely change the way they play the game. I’m reminded of Warren’s inability to adapt, which was largely why he was traded.

The defense should rebound from last year’s debacle, and it was probably naive (pointing the finger at myself) to believe that implementing a new scheme with aging, beyond their prime veterans was the answer. So, part of the problem was in adapting to a new scheme, and another part of the problem was in the personnel used to implement that scheme. Just to illustrate my point, here’s the starting DTs from the beginning of last year:

LT 95 S. Adams, 99 A. McKinley, 93 A. Burton

RT 63 A. Gordon 79, M. Thomas, 93 A. Burton

(sourced from theSportsGuru’s post on Sept. 5, 2007 here at MHR)

Is there any reason to be impressed by these guys? I loved Adams in his prime, but we didn’t have that guy. Our optimism colored our judgment, and we couldn’t see the coming trainwreck.

One of, in fact it may have been the biggest, problems last year was the injury situation. Not only did Denver have problems adjusting to a new defense, one ill-suited to their personnel, the offense—particularly the OL—was racked with injuries. I won’t try to find a source at this point that lists all the injuries, although I saw one recently, but it’s very hard for a team to be successful with a large amount of injuries. One of the reasons I’m enthusiastic about the Broncos chances, although I don’t have great expectations, is because a normal year injury-wise will be far less disruptive. The recent emphasis on quality depth should help insulate us from disruptive effects of injuries.

by Colinski on Jul 14, 2008 2:10 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Not to mention...

Slowik’s version of the ‘show blitz’ defense should be much easier to adapt to than the notoriously complicated system employed by Bates. Slowik’s defense should allow the natural athleticism and speed of our defense to shine and not overcomplicate things (especially for all of the younger players). Furthermore, it should force some bad decisions by opposing QBs and allow our secondary to do its thing. I think a modest improvement on defense would significantly improve the team as a whole by avoiding some of the close losses that we experienced last year. And a substantial improvement on defense? That’s an exciting prospect.

by UnarmingMermaid on Jul 14, 2008 2:20 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bates' scheme

I’m not an ‘Xs and Os’ guy, I leave that to hoosierteacher and others. I do believe, however, that we were asking too much of the defense last year. The combination of a new scheme and new personnel put the defense in an untenable position. And, from my understanding, the Bates’ scheme put more stress on the DL, which was hardly the area of defense that needed an added burden.

I’m interested in what others have to say on the preceding point, but I’d rather see a defense that stops the run first, since we have a pretty good group of DBs with Baily, Bly, etc.

by Colinski on Jul 14, 2008 2:37 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I am with you

That is the biggest difference between the 05/06 and the 07 teams. They could not stop the run. But this year they will be able to IMO. Plus when you can stop the run the Play action is rendered pretty useless. Who is gonna bite on a run fake when the team cant run the ball on the defense

by broncfanstuckinsd on Jul 14, 2008 2:53 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've already written and scheduled an MHR University...

...post about the Bates’ Run Contain Scheme. I believe that it will come out Tue. night. I hope it helps answer some questions.

While the Show Blitz scheme sounds very pass oriented (many of its major principles are focused on the passing game), it has maor elements that address the run game. The major issue is plugging up single gaps, as well as deep penetration to disrupt running plays before they get started. It’s not an advanced run stopping scheme, but (in the run game) it plays to the strengths of the type of players Denver traditionaly uses. I expect the run defense to improve.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 14, 2008 4:41 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

bingo

yes, indeed the first 1/4 of the season has 3 important division games. fortunately, we should be able to scrape by the raiders and chiefs in the early going. i still think the sd game will be trouble, being they are a solid team at this point. we are not. yet. the saints could be trouble if we don’t have our o/d-lines and st’s operating smoothly, but we should be settled in enough to take them at home. jax and ne will be the real tests after that. i don’t like either one of those. tb could also be trouble, but we should eke that one out. the fish? pencil that one in as a w. i’m guessing 5-3, and in the second half of the season we should rip off a bunch of wins. even on the road. the offense will be rolling by then, and we should win some games on that alone. i expect a strong finish against very beatable teams. i’ll say 11-5, a playoff wild-card berth, and a 34-20 beating at indy in the wc round(sorry, i had a nightmare). the big dogs will be in the playoffs, and we just don’t look solid enough in all areas. new coaches, players, injury concerns, and rookies in important spots usually doesn’t make for a playoff run. if we can steal the division, this all changes. but sd has a similar schedule, and i just can’t see them stumbling to 5-6 losses. can i?

by davecheffy on Jul 14, 2008 4:01 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with the 5 win prediction.

One area of help is that SD plays two teams with simular records from last year. That may keep us in striking range for a playoff berth. They are as good as last year (or even a little less, with potential season starting injuries), but we should be moderately improved. Relatively, our schedule should (thus) be slightly easier.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 14, 2008 4:44 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!
Start posting about the Broncos »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Mile High Report
Comcast Redzone Report - Behind the losing streak
The Phinsider
Dolphins in the red zone: Week 11
Pride Of Detroit
Comcast Red Zone Recap: Week 10

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Kyle_orton_drunk_small
What McGeorge likes about the 2009 Denver Broncos.
Charlotte_1_small
Aussie Meanderings: The Tale of Two Teams (pre and post bye).
Small
Why are we freaking out guys?
Ah-64_apache_helicopter_small
Ryan McBean, the difference maker?
Hpim2076_small
UPON FURTHER REVIEW - The Chargers Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Hpim2076_small
UPON FURTHER REVIEW-Scouting the Giants
Zoo_080_small
w 12 odds
Tahoetim_small
Upheaval
Cpfc_club_badge_small
Tales From Across The Pond Day 2
Untitled_4_small
Egads!
N1500960434_30298681_247_small
Gasp...The First Broncos Mock Draft of the Year!  Maybe...
Cutlermarshall_small
Brett Kern, the difference maker?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Acme Packing Company
November APC Jersey Contest - Game 3
Mobile Live
Pour Some Sugar On Me - Washington Redskins Show Promise, Then Break It
Mobile Live
What they're saying - Eagles beat Bears

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

MHR Radio

SPONSORS

Web Stuff


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

Cyborg_small Jeremy Bolander

Asst. Head Coach

Mhr_small Steve Nichols

Tahoetim_small Tim Lynch

J_elway_870111_640_small Douglas A. Lee

Plato_bust_small Emmett Smith

Denver-broncos-button_small Ted Bartlett

The-big-lebowski_small TJ Johnson

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk