Mile High Report: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


The 2008 Denver Broncos - Breaking Down The Roster - Tight End


The Broncs are still trying to replace Sharpe

The Broncos have always enjoyed strong Tight End play during the Mike Shanahan era.  Sure, having a Hall of Fame player at the position for let's say, a decade, substantially increases productivity, but even without Shannon Sharpe the Broncos have been able to utilize their Tight End's in their offensive sets.  A look, however, at the production coming from the position the past 5 seasons shows a disturbing trend downward -

2002 - 61 rec. / 686 yds / 3 TDs
2003 - 62 rec. / 770 yds / 8 TDs

2004 - 58 rec. / 770 yds / 3 TDs
2005 - 58 rec. / 651 yds / 1 TD
2006 - 43 rec. / 518 yds / 6 TDs

In the stats above, 2002 and 2003 were Sharpe's last two seasons as a Bronco.  After he retired, the Broncos went to more of a platoon scenario at tight end.  In 2004 it was Byron Chamberlain and Jeb Putzier.  2005 saw Putzier joined by Stephen Alexander.  In 2006, incredibly, the Broncos had 4 different tight ends make catches, rookie Tony Scheffler, Alexander, Nate Jackson and Chad Mustard.  Sure, the TD production went up, but the number of catches and yards dropped significantly.  Also suffering was the Broncos ground game.  2006 saw the Broncos finish 8th in the League in rushing, their lowest finish in the 5 years studied.  Their rush total, 2152 yards, was their lowest of the period and nearly 400 yards worse than 2005 when they finished 2nd in the League, behind only the Atlanta Falcons.  One could easily come to the conclusion that 400 yards over a 16 game season can be the difference between 13-3 and 9-7.

Things got better in 2007, with Broncos' Tight Ends combining for their best season since Sharpe retired, a subtle sign that the health of the Broncos short passing game might be starting to improve -

2007 - 71 rec. / 891 yards / 8 TDs

The running game, however, continued to decline - 1957 yards - but that number can be misleading. The Broncos averaged a healthy 4.6 yards per carry, easily enough to be successful on the ground. Being behind, forced to throw the football to stay in games, was a major factor.

For the Broncos to be successful in 2008, the Tight Ends must play well in both facets of the game. If 2007 was any indication, the Tight End position is one of strength for the Broncos heading into Training Camp. Let's take a look at each and talk about how they'll impact the roster in '08.

Star-divide

Cmustardphoto_medium

Dgrahamphoto_medium
-- DANIEL GRAHAM (6-3, 257 / 7th Year)

Daniel Graham joined the Broncos in 2007 with alot of fan-fair. A local boy whose father played for the Broncos, Graham had won Super Bowls as a member of the New England Patriots. Unhappy with how the Patriots utilized him in the offense, the former Colorado Buffalo was set on proving to everyone that he was more than a blocking Tight End. He wanted to show that he could be a major weapon in the passing offense. After 2007, Graham did prove some things. He is exactly as advertised in the running game, one of the best blocking Tight Ends in football. A weapon in the passing game? The jury is still out.

In 6 years, Graham has 144 catches totaling 1639 yards. That averages out to 24 catches/273 yards per season. In 2007, Graham had 24 receptions for 246 yards. In other words, he did exactly what we should have expected him to do. The Patriots, it seems, used Graham the way he should be used, as a blocking TE first, a target in the passing game second.

That said, I am expecting more from Graham in 2008. The Tight End is a big-time part of the Shanahan West Coast offense, and with a year in the system under his belt, coupled with a stronger offensive line and depth at WR, Graham should get some opportunities to earn the $15 million of guarantees the Broncos gave him before last season. Look for Graham to be upwards of 35-40 catches, closer to 400 yards, and numerous crucial third down receptions in the flat.

Tschefflerphoto_medium
-- TONY SCHEFFLER (6-5, 250 / 3rd Year)

Tony Scheffler had high hopes heading into 2007.  As a rookie in 2006, Scheffler seemed to find his groove when Jay Cutler took over at quarterback.  The roomates seemed to click on the field.  That all changed a bit when Scheffler broke his foot during the off-season.  Though he was able to make it back in time for the season, and officially played in 16 games, the foot bothered Scheffler off and on all year long.

Despite the injury, and a slow start that saw Scheff make just 2 receptions through the first 5 games, Scheffler turned it on the final 2/3rds of the season once again becoming a trusted target of Cutler.  Even more impressive to me was Scheffler's improvement in the running game, a requirement to stay on the field in a Mike Shanahan offense. 

This is a big year for Scheffler.  First, he needs to prove he can stay healthy.  The foot problem that plagued him in 2007 reared it's ugly head again early in workouts forcing Scheffler to miss significant time.  Now pain-free for the first time in over a year, Scheffler has proclaimed himself ready to go.  If he can stay healthy and productive for a full 16 game season there is no reason why Scheffler can't finish somewhere in the 65 catch range and approach 700 yards.  It's a fact that Cutler looks for Scheffler when things get tough.  Let's hope Scheffler can stay on the field to help his quarterback out.

 

Njacksonphoto_medium
-- NATE JACKSON (6-3, 235 / 6th Year)

Every year seems to be the year that Nate Jackson becomes this super-hybrid, receiver/tight-end threat that no one can match-up with.  Every year Jackson is on the shelf by week 10 with a groin pull or hamstring tear.  Shanny loves the guy, however, and it looks like Jackson is a safe bet to make the 53-man roster once again.

There is little doubting what Jackson can bring when he can stay on the field.  Solid on special teams, Jackson has good speed, especially for his size, and does create issues for defenders.  Too fast to be covered by linebackers, Jackson is too strong for a corner and even most safeties.  It is a tempting and attractive package, even if Jackson has been more of a tease over his first 5 seasons.

As for 2008, this has to be the make or break year in Denver for Jackson, doesn't it??  This will be the 6th time Jackson has broke camp with the team, and if he can't stay healthy and make an impact, even if it is just as a special teams ace, will he ever be able to do it.  That is the big question, but with the Broncos likely to carry 4 Tight Ends into the season it appears Jackson will get the chance.

 

Mleachphoto_medium
--MIKE LEACH (6-2, 240 / 9th Year)

There might not be any statistics for Leach, and you could probably run into him on the street and have no idea he is one of the most important members of the team.  While Leach is listed as a TIght End, his worth to the team is in one ultra-important area - the Long Snapper - and Leach is one of the best in football.

There has been talk in the NFL recently of making a game day roster exemption for long snappers, similar to the way the 3rd quarterback is designated.  Makes complete sense to me, because you are highly, highly unlikely to see Leach ever lineup at Tight End.  Given the spotlight last year when Peter King listed him as #1000 in his Top-500 in the NFL, Leach has been just as important to the special teams in past seasons as Jason Elam, perhaps more. 

We have seen first hand what a bad snap can do to a team and a season.  Have the Bengals recovered from their botched extra point against the Broncos in 2006??  I can't remember the last time Leach blew a snap, and think about the Buffalo win last season.  Sure, Elam was clutch, but Leach had to get the ball set and snapped.  Impressive.

If you were going to list the Broncos roster by how safe they should feel, Leach would be right up there with Cutler and Champ Bailey.  Long snappers are hard to come by.  When you get a good one you simply don't ever let them go.

 

Bpiercephoto_medium
BRETT PIERCE (6-5, 250 / 3rd Year)

Pierce is the virtual no-name of the group.  Signed as an undrafted free-agent by the Baltimore Ravens in 2004, Pierce went on the spend 2004 and 2005 with the Dallas Cowboys.   Out of the NFL for 2 seasons, the Broncos signed Pierce to a futures contract on Dec. 31, 2007.  Nothing more than roster fodder or someone for the Practice Squad, Pierce will unlikely see much more than the first couple weeks of camp.

Cmustardphoto_medium
CHAD MUSTARD (6-6, 277 / 5th Year)

After doing some digging, and talking to my sources, Chad Mustard has officially been moved back to tight end.  While his versatility makes him an attractive piece to keep around, can the Broncos really afford to keep 5 designated tight ends?  Even if you answer that question, Mustard is likely out for the start of training camp with a torn hamstring he suffered during team workouts in early June.  Even if you think Mustard is valuable enough to hang onto when healthy, is he worth a roster spot at less than 100%??

My thought is no and no.  I am going to stick with Nate Jackson(call me a fool) and the injury to Mustard makes it impossible for me to think he'll break camp on the roster.  If he can get healthy, however, Mustard will surely be the first name in Shanny's rolodex should someone get hurt in camp.

Ok, time for your thoughts on the Tight End situation!  Coming up in Part 2, Defensive Tackle

 

Poll
What Grade Would You Give The Broncos' Tight End Situation?
A
238 votes
B
373 votes
C
92 votes
D
13 votes
F
9 votes

725 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs | Comment 20 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Who voted F?

It wasn’t me. We are stacked, I voted A. Scheffler is a premium receiving tight end, and Graham is a premium blocking tight end. I wouldn’t mind having both in one package, but at least between the two of them, we have it made. The advantage is that if one get’s hurt, we aren’t totally out of luck.

by unkown on Jul 9, 2008 10:43 PM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What about Mustard???

He’s certainly not as flashy as some of the other guys, but he’s versatile and a great team player. He’s filled in as an OT, so he’s got good blocking skills, and he proved at the end of last season that he also has decent receiving skills. I think he makes a good back-up to Graham.

I give them a B for now. If Scheffler can stay healthy, they could become an elite squad.

by BornOrange on Jul 10, 2008 2:16 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You said it.....

Mustard is listed as an OT on the roster so I will list him there….To me, with the depth along the O-line what it is, the question will be whether to keep Mustard or Jackson. I think Jackson will get the nod.

-TSG

www.milehighreport.com

by John Bena (aka TheSportsGuru) on Jul 10, 2008 3:26 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My God I hope not.

I know that Jackson always seems to make the cut, but I entirely agree with the statement made by BornOrange. Mustard can block, and has proved he can catch. Jackson just doesn’t seem to either very well, but blocks much less better than receives.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by hoosierteacher on Jul 10, 2008 1:27 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The injury

I failed to mention the injury, which I think will be cleared near the end of camp.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by hoosierteacher on Jul 10, 2008 1:34 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm with you on Mustard

With Graham, Scheffler, Jackson, and Mustard, the Broncos have two good receivers and two good blockers. I personally don’t see them going anywhere.

One might wonder whether the Broncos would keep five TEs, with Leach on the roster. But Leach is a TE by name only . . . he’s close to the best long snapper in the league. He has to be listed somewhere since LS is not an official position, so that is it for him. In reality, the Broncos still would have four TEs.

by AZDynamics on Jul 12, 2008 11:28 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Voted B

To be an A, a team needs a Antonio Gates/Jason Witten type of player. I dont think we have that… yet – Sheff might develop into one.

Remember: New England won 18 last year; Oakland's won 19 in a half-decade
/The great Dane - formerly known as Claaaaas!

by Claus Vestergaard on Jul 10, 2008 4:15 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What about

him catching a TD with his hamstring, when most players just injure theirs? TD!

Or what about his heads up play to uncover and get open on a play that didn’t even call for him to run a route? TD!

Or how he caught a pass with both Mannings (CHI) draped all over him? TD!

Don’t wait for the media to canonize this kid! I’m polishing up his bust for Canton even as we speak!

Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.

by styg50 on Jul 10, 2008 6:34 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

As long as Scheff is Healthy

They get a strong A for me.

Graham and Scheff are a GREAT combo. I think that Tony is a top 5 in the league recieving TE, and Daniel is one of the best blockers. It is great to have them both.

I would like to see more two TE sets

Go M's

by OBF on Jul 10, 2008 7:51 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Mustard

Mustard is a downright beast in the run blocking game and he’s got a nice set of hands on him. Normally, I’d say he’d make the roster on that alone, but the fact that he can play tackle as well makes him that much more valuable. We’ll see Chad Mustard contribute this season.

by Inkana7 on Jul 10, 2008 9:32 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Vote B

I agree with the comment made earlier about why this grade isn’t quite an A. I believe the potential is definately there; AND Scheff was impressive in last year’s remaining 2/3 season. There is no denying that Culter likes to throw to him. There just isn’t a fear inspiring TE right now, such as a Gates or Gonzo. I think Scheff could be that guy. Graham isn’t that guy in my mind. Granted he is unequaled in blocking, but his hands are medicore at best. He deserves a roster spot, without question.

I know this is a TE discussion, but I think this is important. What concerns me most is Marshall. Second who will step up and be our #2 WR. If Marshall gets into any more trouble, not only will Shanny boot him, but there is a good chance the league will suspend him. Now, how is this important? If we have no decent options for Culter at WR, he will fall back to the TE position and the running game. Suddenly Denver becomes two dimensional, where it needs to be three.

I know, I know… there is some potentially good talent at WR right now through draft and FA. Potentially. The FA pick ups all had good, but not stellar seasons before putting on the orange and blue.

Just my two cents, and with the cost of gas… one cent.

by kymerd on Jul 10, 2008 11:17 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I voted C

for now. I think they can be as good as a B+. I am concerned about health of Sheff. And the consistency of Graham. I know Graham can be on the field for all downs. I still remember him at CU he as a beast. But maybe with a better WR corp this year the TE’s will be more of a threat. I am just being a little cautious becuase of the problems the Broncos have had at that position since Sharpe retired. IMO

by broncfanstuckinsd on Jul 10, 2008 11:45 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Mustard

I have a feeling that Mustard was the #3 TE but his injury is going to make it hard to keep him on the opening day roster. It’s hard to say how attractive he will look to other teams if he’s he’s waived; he’s managed to clear before. The ability to recall a player as needed is important, oddly, and that may answer the question of who makes the opening day roster.

The question of which TE makes the roster this year bifurcates on ‘pass catching’ V. ‘blocking’ TEs. All of the TEs, with the possible exception of Pierce, fall cleanly into one camp or the other. And the question is whether the Broncos feel they need two ‘blocking’ TEs. Last year’s roster had Alexander, who combined the two, but there aren’t two blocking TEs left without Mustard. My personal feeling is that they would prefer two blockers, but that option may have closed with Mustard’s injury (at least, for the opening day roster). I think we’ll see Mustard come back aboard during the season, assuming he’s healthy and no one else claims him.

I won’t attempt to explain the virtues of having two strong blockers at TE. Hoosierteacher has already provided us with an explanation, and he could elaborate on the rationale far better than I could, but I do think its important to have two strong blocking TEs to counteract all of the defense’s strategies and this goes beyond the mere need to have a blocker for the running game.

I have a feeling that Mustard’s injury may pave the way for Hillis, even though using a FB to achieve the same function won’t be as desirable. Hillis is too versatile and adds so much to the short passing game that it will be very hard to leave him off the roster.

by Colinski on Jul 10, 2008 5:43 PM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Astute observations Colinski!

The only other thing I can think of that might enter into the roster decision is ST blocking. Tight Ends are usually pretty good open field blockers and while everybody is ready to annoint Royal as the second coming of Rick Upchurch, for us to improve field position he will need some bigger bodies out in front and the best ST blocker may get that roster spot. Great comment, thank you.

What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us. - Emerson

by firstfan on Jul 10, 2008 6:03 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Special Teams

I omitted STs for the sake of brevity, and I also defer to those members who have a better grip on the subject matter.

From what little I ‘know,’ so to speak; TEs are the best size/speed combination and thus make the best ST candidates. And I assume this primarily means coverage teams. Other obvious ST members would be LBs & FBs, who also fit into the size/speed mold. However, I admit to being almost a complete blank on ST’s responsibilities so my analysis is mostly just guesswork..

I like the number, which I only dimly recall, of STs comprising 23% of a team. That’s 23% measured in terms of importance, which leaves offense and defense at 38.5% each. I think that an unusually large number of this year’s draft & CFA class may stick with the team, but their ability to make the team, in many cases, will depend on their performance on STs—of course. For instance, a 6th LB position, or even a 7th, seems to be up for grabs between Larsen, Woodyard & Beck. STs performance is going to big part of the decision on who and how many LBs are kept, and I also think pass coverage ability is going to figure heavily in the backup LB position. Another area where STs play is going be the DBS. Jack Williams would appear relatively safe but Joshua Barrett’s ability to stick may depend heavily on how well he performs at gunner, and I expect that both will get auditioned there. Williams will probably be tried at KO return and has some experience there.

by Colinski on Jul 10, 2008 9:58 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

mustard or catch-up

if we are are planning to have and hold leads this season, then we should keep mustard. if we presume we will be behind and need to pass the ball more, it appears jackson would be a better receiving target. all in all, i like mustard. graham can catch more balls if needed(schefff injury), though he will never be great at it. now, if graham gets hurt… trouble. can we keep both? i doubt it, but maybe. jackson to me is a bit overrated, though, and mustard is a versatile, proven commodity. lock him in as a te/ol, like “house” was. was there anything that house wouldn’t do? same here

by davecheffy on Jul 11, 2008 12:02 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ball control offense

A common mistake, IMHO, that many fans make is in assuming that it’s desirable to score as quickly as possible. Although it’s true that many defenses are designed to stop an offense by forcing it to make a mistake and/or putting it in a long yardage situation, so a ball control offense can sometimes play into the defense’s hands, but an offense that can control the ball gradually wears down the defense. In essence, a ball control offense does the job of the defense by preventing the opposing team’s offense from having the ball. Another equally important function, which was apparent to Bronco fans last year, is giving your own defense a rest, rather than having them do to you what you’re trying to do to them.

Having a TE as a target in the short passing game where he provides an easy target for a high percentage pass is important, but most plays require the TE to block. It’s therefore more important on most plays that a TE can block proficiently, since this is his most valuable contribution to the success of the play.

I agree that the Broncos need 2 very proficient blocking TEs and not just one. Last year they kept 4 plus Leach (who’s actually a very important STs contributer even beyond his LS duties), and I think they’d like to keep 4 this year, too. The question is whether Mustard will be healed enough by the start of the season to provide that blocking TE, and I think it’s unlikely. Is it worth trying to find another TE at this point? Or should the Broncos hope the Scheffler is a good enough blocker for now and stand pat for a while? Depending on Mustard’s condition, he should be able to rejoin the team during the season. Another alternative, which I was hinting at, is to use a FB such as Hillis to achieve many of the same objectives while Mustard heals. Hillis is a sort of HB type, from what little I understand of the position, so he could be used in many of the same ways that the Broncos use their TEs.

I’d love to hear what anyone else thinks of this last idea, since I’m not versed enough in the ‘Xs and Os” to address whether it’s possible.

by Colinski on Jul 11, 2008 1:34 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I believe

That if given the chance Graham can be an everydown TE. Everyone knows he can block. I do believe he can catch. You dont the Mackey award without be a receiving TE. He has never been given a true chance to catch the ball in NE or last year. Maybe drops had something to do with it or the fact early in the season the run d was bad the Broncos needed to score and stretch the field and a TE not named Sharpe is not gonna do that. I think Sheff is gonna need to improve his blocking which I think will come.
Where are all the Riley Odoms when you need one

by broncfanstuckinsd on Jul 11, 2008 11:40 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!
Start posting about the Broncos »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bronco-pride_small
Well I'll Be Damned
Alinsky_small
Brandon Marshall's On-Field Problems
Small
My Brandon Marshall Scouting Report
Mcmurrylogo__1__small
The affect of McDaniels promotion to offensive coordinator
Mcd_small
A personal look at Alphonso Smith

Recent FanPosts

Helmet_small
Optimism abounds in D-Town
Mcd_small
A graphical view comparison of quarterbacks: debunking the myths.
Small
Excited about potential
Thinker_statue_small
Coach Analysis- San Diego
Small
new guy
Broncos_helmet_1_nfl
What a difference a Coach makes...
Small
Do Denver's SB wins deserve asterisks?
Ybr__paps__vaps__hate__watch_ma_back_small
Scheffler Intro, BMarsh Outro

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

MHR Radio

SPONSORS

Web Stuff


iPing-it!

Listed on BlogShares

Sports blogs Sports Blogs
Top NFL Fan Sites
Best Football Sites

Rate Me on BlogHop.com!
the best pretty good okay pretty bad the worst

Top Blogs
Sports Blogs




General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena (aka TheSportsGuru)

Victor_hugo_small styg50

Asst. Head Coach

Mhr_small hoosierteacher

Lynch_coat_of_arms_small Zappa

J_elway_870111_640_small nycbroncosfan

Grizzly_small broncobear

Denver-broncos-button_small TedBartlett905

Quality Control

Karliandnick_small nickt84

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports