MHR University - How to Watch Preseason Games
The season is just around the corner! But first comes the mysterious and controversial preseason games. Controversial, because coaches have to weigh the value of getting players ready or evaluated versus injured. Controversial, because the League, networks, and even fans can't agree on issues surrounding ticket prices and revenue for games that "don't count". But mysterious, because we as fans have to balance cheering for our team to win knowing that the team isn't going all out for a win. So what do we watch for?
Here's a guide to watching the preseason games in a manner that allows you to learn about the team, evaluate players, and gauge the team's success moving forward, regardless of what the scoreboard says.
Read on...

Different coaches approach the preseason differently, but all coaches are a little more vanilla than they would be if the game counted. They aren't going to show every wrinkle of a system. They are also going to call plays to test a team in a situation, even if the situation doesn't exist (such as a two minute drill at he end of a half even though the team leads, or going for it on fourth down, even though the game condition calls for a punt).
Some coaches, like Shanahan, believe in the school of thought that you "train like you would fight". Mike might take it easy on the players in camp (compared to most teams), but in the PS he generaly calls the game the way he might in a regular game. For this reason, he also gets a lot more PS wins. Does this count against his ability to evaluate? Not at all. Mike is also a coach that has his mind pretty much made up near the start of camp who is going to be on the roster, so he is ahead of the curve. Still, he'll make some calls to try out scenarios that he wouldn't do if the game counted.
But what do we watch for in a Denver PS game? The coaches are still holding back, and the competitions are more settled than most fans might think, right? Well, there's a lot to watch for. Here's what I'll be watching for if I'm lucky enough to catch a game.
The Players
Some position things to watch for:
- Our receivers coach, in concert with our OFF coord., is going to emphasize more of a power/possession approach over speed. On run plays, watch the receivers (if the camera angles allow it) to see which receivers block well, particularly the receiver away from the play.
- Of the receivers new to the team, which ones have chemistry with Cutler?
- The safety's first movement is towards an assignment or a zone. His second move indicates how well he's read the play. That's the move to watch.
- How well do the halfbacks protect Cutler if held back to pass block?
- Boss's background is zone. See if he goes man coverage on TEs, or if the SS gets the assignment. Whoever gets the assignment, how well do they do? Does the SS play back, or closer to scrimmage?
- Does the MLB track the halfback, or does he take a center zone? If the team runs a "show blitz" like Coyer did, the MLB will play man. But most "shows" run a zone. The MLB is key to see which variation we run.
- Do the DTs get penetration on the run plays? Yes, I wrote "run plays". We will shoot gaps on pass plays, but with a predominantly one gap style at DT, do we disrupt run plays in the backfield?
- It's almost too obvious to write, but who are the first eleven players on the field for the first plays on offense and defense? But here's something else to consider: who plays STs on the kick-off?
- How does the OL do in pass protection? Most vanilla calls by the defensive coords. will be simple slants designed to get to the QB.
- Who looks tired at the end of each quarter? When a play is blown, how well does a player shake it off?
- Does Young get spelled, rotated, changed for pace, or play every down?
- When a pass play for the offense goes for long yardage, was the error made by the CB or the SAF?
The Systems
Denver is going to stick with a zone blocking, one cut run scheme paired with a west coast passing scheme on offense. While I'm thinking that the team is being built to run a "show blitz" system on defense (based on statements and personnel moves), there is nothing certain. Here's what to look for in terms of the systems.
- If (on several plays) Denver crowds the line with defensive players, than either brings a massive blitz or backs everyone off, we are running the old "show blitz". Another possibility is to watch if our DEs drop back into coverage here and there. This would indicate a "zone blitz" system. If Denver does neither, the keys to watch for to classify the system being run include:
- Is the MLB playing man or zone?
- Is the DL evenly spaced, and if not, how is it spaced?
- CBs in man or zone? (We'll be in man at CB, no doubt about it).
- Where is the SS positioned?
- 1 or 2 gap play by the DTs? (We'll be in 1 gap).
- How often do we blitz?
- Do the #2 and nickleback CBs play tight, on, or off in their coverage? (Bailey is allowed to always play off, which fits his personal style).
- Is the defense playing "bend, don't break", "hold the line", or aggressively? How much blitzing is there?
- Is the 4-3 the base formation? Is it a standard 4-3, or a variation (staggered, heavy, weak, over, under, etc)? [We'll run a 4-3, probably a base unless we have a major weakness at a LB position].
- Is the defense trying to force the pass or the run, or playing it even?
- Are there certain plays that have more prominence?
- Who is covering the TE, the SS or the SAM?
- On plays where the SAM plays a zone, is it towards the sideline most of the time, or toward the center?
- Does the WILL play more "zone and blitz" or "zone and man"?
- On offense, how much misdirection will we use this year? Is the boot still in use, does Cutler run a few options, or does he stay in the pocket more?
- How smooth does Cutler sell the play action pass, and how often is it used?
- Do we see Cutler making audibles on the line? How much leeway is he getting from the coach on the sideline this year?
- When Cutler throws an INT, was it a bad decision on his part, on the part of the receiver, or good defense?
- How much does the TE figure into the pass game this year? Does it seem to be planned, a safety valve, or the absense of Marshall (if that becomes the case).
- Does Cutler have favorite targets, or does he spread the ball?
- How do the cheerleaders look? Are they as hot as last year?
A lot of fans will watch to see who makes the big plays. My opinion is that this isn't the way to go. The coaches are probably more interested in who plays consistently well, and less on who makes a game changing play. But that's just my opinion. I think the decision (in Denver's case) is made before the pre-season on who will make the team. The decisions left are for a few players on the bubble, or if a player really blows it time after time.
Another thing that I consider is that I don't get excited by how many wins or losses we have. Good play can be indicative of how the other team runs their preseason, and losses might have been wins if the team were going all out. However, if the team loses and played very poorly, that is something to watch for (ala last year).
Denver's goal is to get the players up to speed, and to give the players some confidence heading into the season. Let's hope for the best, but let's take the preseason into its proper context and watch it with a studious eye.
What will you be watching for?
4 recs |
13
comments
| Add your comment
Read Related
Comments
The Cheerleaders
are HOTTER than last year ha ha ha!
Until Terrell Davis makes it into the Hall of Fame, I refuse to acknowledge the existence of such a place other than the Ring of Fame at Mile High!
Davis to the Hall!
by Jon Tollerud on
Aug 4, 2008 4:21 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
You got me that time HT
I was reading along very intent on the content when I hit that bullet about the cheerleaders. Now I know what those monster rainbow feel like when they rise to slurp in a juicy fly only to discover it is an artficial. Excellent post in spite of the chicanery. I notice we have numerous new members and some long time members who might have missed your epic post on Defensive Gaps and Techniques. If any members care to read it, click here. You have given us another excellent post. You must have read my comment asking for such a post. Thanks.
What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us. - Emerson
by firstfan on
Aug 4, 2008 5:05 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
Thanks HT
Hey-
how does one (I guess how do I...one might already know) tell if the DTs are playing 1- or 2-gap?
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on
Aug 4, 2008 5:30 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
Good question!
First, read the link that FirstFan gives above to give you a good idea of what you’re watching for.
Then keep in mind that despite the predominant ability of a player (and the type of scheme implemented) that not every DT will play 1 or 2 gap every down. With that in mind, on obvious running plays, start watching the line instead of the QB on each play (it’s also an excellent way to pick up on elements of the game that most fans never clue into). Watch to see if a DT immediately hits a specific gap, or seems to be involved in the tussle going on in the trenches before making his move (when the RB does). The longer you watch the fight in the trenches, the more obvious the difference becomes.
Even an obvious running play may go pass, but for now just focus on short yardage plays. I say this because it’s hard to enjoy the game only watching the lines clash, especialy when you want to watch the Broncos in their winning efforts. Another way to go is to watch the lines in a non Broncos game so you don’t feel you’re missing anything.
Different people watch different elements of the game. Most fans (and cameras) watch the QB, then the ball. I like to watch the area just between the LBs and the safeties to see how the defense moves as a group. With camera angles, this isn’t always possible. In that case, I watch the QB and the ball like everyone else.
Let us know when you start seeing a difference in how the DTs play the gaps!
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Aug 4, 2008 5:59 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
And by the way...
...”I” tell how the DTs are playing is proper grammer, and so is “one”. “One” is the formal, and would be proper if writing an academic paper where the author is insignificant to the material. “I” is the informal, and correct in almost every other setting.
In your case, either would have been correct, but “I” would have been considered slightly more correct as we are not communicating in a formal manner. You get an “A”!
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by hoosierteacher on
Aug 4, 2008 6:04 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
I rarely disagree...
I like this article but i came away with it as you severly underestimating the importance of preseason games on the roster. Sure the coach knows most if not all of who will make the roster. But the depth charts cant even begin to be thought up until you see them in preseason. Shanny has stated in his press statements that he doesnt feel you can even decide on a RB and Saftey until you see them in preseason.
On the Broncos’ running backs:
"I feel good. Like I said before, the running back position and the safety position I usually save the evaluations for the preseason games. Thus far, I am very happy with both."
Id like to name a few decisions i truly think have the possibility to go many ways. Im sure Shanny knows which WR’s make the team, but id bet he could use some game situations to hammer out a depth chart. Our O-line could change alot once Holland returns and they are playing in game situations, We have hyped all our rookies (and other youngins) on both offense and defense, who have never been in any nfl game preseason or other, including but not limited to, royal, barret, beck, Hillis!, If any of these don’t pan out in preseason then expect other assurances to be signed, such as Sapp and Engleberger Vaughn or Ekuban, or maybe dare I say Vanderjagt. And lets not forget our back-up QB who at any point could become the leader of this team. I also like to site that if i remember correctly Brandon Marshall wasn’t listed on the first depth charts last season (but id have to check sources there).
So i still agree the coach knows who will make the cut for the most part, for teams shouldn’t change that drastically anyway year to year, and they know what is invested in who, So i think there are just more bubble spots then you are thinking, especially with our youth.
Keep up the good posts…
by GreasyQtip on
Aug 4, 2008 6:38 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
Great post HT
and I thought I would let anyone who hasn’t tried it know that the print function (located just above where the comments start) works beautifully!
It even prints the comments which may or may not be desirable, but on an HT post, they usually are…
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by styg50 on
Aug 4, 2008 6:56 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
Did you guys hear..........?
Brandon Marshall could be suspended.
Michael Fabiano really knows nothing about football outside of regression analysis and stat extrapolation. If it doesn’t have to do with fantasy football, his opinion is worthless.
by kwool79 on
Aug 4, 2008 7:06 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
well played my friend!
well played indeed!
by UnarmingMermaid on
Aug 4, 2008 8:49 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
Keeping with the theme:
Where are the Snowdons of yesteryear?
"The angel is no more than the shark well-governed." -Herman Melville
by jadunn on
Aug 5, 2008 5:25 PM MDT
up
reply
0 recs
A couple comments about the 11 on the field
I was gonna make a similar comment in the depth chart post, but it makes sense here too. I think Coach Shanahan will sometimes move (usually younger) players up to the first team so he can evaluate their play with/against other first teamers even if that player has not moved up to number one on the depth chart.
For that same reason it is important to keep an eye on who the players are competing against. As an example, Colt Brennan put up great numbers against Indy yesterday. But he made at least one pass that likely would have been intercepted had he been playing against the first team defense because the linebackers would have been quicker to close the hole the ball went through.
by MattR on
Aug 4, 2008 8:08 PM MDT
reply
0 recs
















