Broncos Shopping Foxworth!
According to this article from ESPN (BW warning!), D. Foxworth is being shopped out by the Broncos. It might be hard to believe, except that their are some direct quotes.
<!-- begin whole table --><!-- end sidebar table -->The Denver Broncos are in the process of trading nickel cornerback Domonique Foxworth.
<!-- begin top part -->
The cornerback was told by the team that he is close to being traded and to go home and wait to be traded. Foxworth said that he was told that there are several teams Denver is talking to and that he has no clue where he will play next week only that it won't be with the Broncos.
Foxworth said the Broncos are handling the situation with class.
"They didn't have to give me a warning," Foxworth said. "They are being classy about it. I'm not upset about it at all."
The Patriots, Redskins, Saints, Rams and Browns are among the teams that need a cornerback.
Foxworth, entering his fourth NFL season, has been Denver's nickel cornerback. With him on his way out, Denver's backup cornerbacks behind Champ Bailey and Dre' Bly are Karl Paymah and rookie Jack Williams.
Bill Williamson covers the NFL for ESPN.com.
What's the bright side to giving up such a solid nickleback? It means a few good things.
- Denver is confident in the CB depth we have (including a new rookie),
- We're likely to get something of value in return.
As much as I don't like the idea of Foxy leaving, maybe his trade value will net us something equaly as valuable.
Thoughts?
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
1 recs |
76 comments
Comments
Williams
I think that the key was watching Jack Williams grow into the pro game faster than anyone expected. Fopxy, although I like him, didn’t have a great preseason – partially, as HT points out, due to their scheming, but there were weaknesses in his game as well. Williams is a ball hawk with a feasrless attitude. How he will due against the next level of receiver I don’t know, but I think that the coaches feel good about it.
I wish Foxworth well in his career, and I’ll root for him anytime he doesn’t play the Broncs.
Atwater for the Hall!
by Emmett Smith on Sep 1, 2008 1:47 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I am stunned
That leaves us with just four corners. Foxworth was also a back up safety. Broncos better be getting something good for him. I was expecting a trade or two, but not this.
while yet unspoken, you are master of the word. After it is spoken, the word is master of you.
by bradley on Sep 1, 2008 1:48 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
With depth at SAF...
..I think Foxworth’s value fell (very slightly). The value might come in trading a great nickleback (while retaining a very good one) for a pick-up elswhere (DT? LB? etc) might be the thinking. I think we have the depth at the position where we have no weaknesses. In dimes (assuming we have an injury), it isn’t unusual to put a back-up SAF in the mix at CB.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Sep 1, 2008 1:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What this tell me
is that the Broncos are even higher on Williams than I thought. Maybe his second preseason interception is what sealed the deal. As much as I like Foxworth, this is probably the best time to trade him, with his value still high. NewEngland needs help at corner. Maybe we can get Vince Wolfork!
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Sep 1, 2008 4:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahahahah
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Wolfork. I wish. I hope to any and all dieties that I’m wrong when I say, Wolfork will NOT be part of this trade.
"I could never quite get the hang of Thursdays..."
by FlaBroncoFan on Sep 1, 2008 4:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I know
Glad you enjoyed my joke.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Sep 1, 2008 8:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
DT DT DT DT DT
A DT with the same value as Foxworth would be great. I think that foxy could potentially be a starter in the NFL, but that he gives too much cushion to be a starter in Denver.
by Jeeeeens on Sep 1, 2008 2:00 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
In fairness...
I think he gives too much cushion (in the preseason) because he is told to. He was playing against 1st teamers, and the call to play off, on, or tight is typicaly made by the coordinator. I think he could play #2 CB for many teams.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Sep 1, 2008 2:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Foxworth played off Terrell Owens all night in the Dallas game. He didn’t do that because he wanted to, but because that’s what he was told to do. Owens had zero YAC’s that night. Foxworth wrapped him up right after the catch. IMO, it was a great game by Foxworth.
while yet unspoken, you are master of the word. After it is spoken, the word is master of you.
by bradley on Sep 1, 2008 4:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
For all I heard
about Foxworth doing well in camp, I never felt like it showed up in the preseason games. He’s best suited to be a Cover-2 corner, and I think he needs to go to a team that plays a lot of zone.
I’m very high on Jack Williams, and I think the only reason he lasted until the 4th round is that he’s about 5 foot 6. He’s a guy who jumps off the screen at you when the game is being played, though. I think he will supplant Paymah pretty quickly as the 3rd cornerback.
"I wouldn't ever set out to hurt anyone deliberately unless it was, you know, important --like a league game or something." DICK BUTKUS
by Ted Bartlett on Sep 1, 2008 2:17 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope you're right...
Paymah didn’t impress in Arizona. He looked fair in coverage, but very timid in tackling and hardly ever made a play on the ball. J Will looks much more aggressive towards making plays on the ball. Just my .02
by donbok1 on Sep 1, 2008 2:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
what would be a fair draft pick to trade Fox for?
by RiG on Sep 1, 2008 2:48 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s a shame, I’ve always been a big fan of Foxworth and he’s one of the classiest guys on the team. And he was born in Oxford (UK) so he’s kind of local in a distant way.
However, I’ll trust the FO on this one. I really hope we get something/one good in return. I think it’s cutting things a little fine because I would be seriously apprehensive about having Paymah as #2 if Bly were to go down. Or if the unspeakable were to happen. It wouldn’t be on the Roc Alexander scale, but I’d feel much better with Foxworth in there.
Still, I guess JMFW is turning out better than anyone could have expected. It’s just that the FO are going to have to start thinking about getting a CB to supersede Bly and Foxworth was a good safety blanket in that respect. But I’m guessing Slo’s pretty good at picking out corner prospects. If he’s still around then.
Whatever happens, I hope we send him somewhere nice with a classy organisation, I know it’s business, but I’d hate for him to end up somewhere like Cincy.
by Muse_Cubed on Sep 1, 2008 3:29 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Potentially good news!
I have been calling Foxy out as the weakest link when he has to play Corner. It has shown that he has problems covering, but he can play a Cover 2 position. I just felt he was a liability if we needed him filling in for Champ. He can be successful in other systems, and I’d rather have Jack Will in there even with the rookie mistakes that he will certainly make this year.
I like Foxworth a lot and he is a great spokesperson and leader off the field. In that end I will miss him and hope him success wherever he goes.
As far as the potential return? It will depend on what we get for him.
"If Denver beats us, I'll walk back to Detroit" - Alex Karras
by Denver Diehard on Sep 1, 2008 3:39 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Timing only surprise to me.
I predicted in an earlier post that Foxy was near his end as a Bronco, but I thought they would trade him at the end of this year.
I liked him, as he was a good character guy, and provided solid depth. But he did not have the skills to start in our defense. His lack of size and/or make up speed and/or ball skills were evident in his preseason play. Him getting beat twice (once for a TD) against a back up receiver from Dallas was probably confirmed the coaches thoughts of dealing him.
However, I think they are trading him because the Broncos think we can get someone else who can help us even more, or they think his trade value is best now. Personally, I hope we get a veteran offensive tackle to back up both Clady and Harris, cause Pears has regressed significantly. Right now, back up O-Tackle is our weakest link.
by The Gun Young on Sep 1, 2008 3:41 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm excited for several reasons now
1. I want to see this Jack Williams kid
2. I want to know who/what we get in return
3. I want to see this Jack Williams kid!!
"I could never quite get the hang of Thursdays..."
by FlaBroncoFan on Sep 1, 2008 4:08 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
05 Draft
Broncos drafted 3 corners – Darrent Williams, Domonique Foxworth, and Karl Paymah. Someone said at the time that Paymah maybe had the best upside because of size and the fact that he had only played man coverage in college (Washington State). We all know what happened to Williams, but it’s interesting that Paymah looks to be the last of these three very nice young men.
Did Paymah outlast Foxworth because of ability, or because one or the other was expendable, and Foxworth would get a better return?
Both were going to be unrestricted free agents next year, so upon reflection, that will have an effect on what we get for him (it’s not like we traded Champ).
while yet unspoken, you are master of the word. After it is spoken, the word is master of you.
by bradley on Sep 1, 2008 4:09 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
timing
We’ve written about this subject — of trading Foxy and/or Paymah — so it’s hardly a surprise, especially considering they’re both RFAs on tender offers who are free to depart at the end of the season without compensation to the Broncos.
We can argue about the timing — I stated in an earlier post that early was better than late — but the important thing was that they got it done. And it’s probably a good idea to make some arrangements regarding Paymah, too.
As I said before, I’d like to see the Broncos pick up another DT, but I don’t know that they’ll be able to get the appropriate value so I’d just as soon see draft picks, especially considering the distribution of defensive players in the next 2 draft crops. If the scouts do their homework next year then the Broncos can find DL help in the 3rd – 4th range and use the first two picks on a LB and S. Having some more picks is a windfall, and it was a waste to use Foxy as a nickle if another team considering him a potential starter and were willing to give us appropriate compensation in return.
by Colinski on Sep 1, 2008 4:36 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Ditto for me. The timing is right.
It hurts to lose a classy guy, but it is not realistic to expect to be able to keep him after this season, due to Foxworth’s higher value to other teams as a potential #2 instead of just a nickleback.
My non-concurrence with Colinski is that a DT should be drafted in the 2nd AND the 3rd round. I am tired of the lack of replenishment the D-Line has had to deal with.
by Arctic Bronco on Sep 1, 2008 6:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
draft strategy
I wasn’t a big fan of the flooding strategy.
I think the focus on filling a single position (e.g., CB in 05) is a mistake on several levels. The link is to a fairly interesting article on drafting strategies — ENJOY!
by Colinski on Sep 1, 2008 11:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Paymah’s in danger of fizzling out to be honest – in the end Foxworth is actually tradeable whilst Paymah might get a “who?” out of some bemused GMs.
I thought at the end of the 2005 season that Paymah might come on in a couple of years…but as it stands now, I don’t think he’ll ever fulfill his potential – he’s been too slow burning and whilst he may be a solid dimeback I wouldn’t want to entrust him with any other role.
It’s weird to think that Paymah’s the last member of the ’05 draft though because I thought that at least 3 of them had a long term future with the Broncos (2CBs and Myers).
by Muse_Cubed on Sep 1, 2008 4:37 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I see it much the same way, although I think getting more playing time could expedite a trade. And I do see us moving him before the end of the season, as odd as that may seem. We can function with 3 good CBs and a passable 4th, whoever that may be.
BTW, re: Myers. We did get our pick back for him, so we didn’t lose any value. I’m quite happy with how the OL is developing now, we have the ability to put a solid nucleus together that could last for a long time.
by Colinski on Sep 1, 2008 4:49 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
True about Myers. We got Larsen out of that, right?
by Muse_Cubed on Sep 1, 2008 5:27 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
YUP
And Myers was useful but I don’t think he had that much upside. I would expect someone like…..say….Kuper, who was similarly a middle round pick, to become a better player. I like the final outcome — we get Lichtensteiger, who looks like he’ll be a much better player in the long run.
by Colinski on Sep 2, 2008 4:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man...
I am really astonished by this.
Shanny better have something pretty impressive on the burner because right now this doesn’t make sense.
by UnarmingMermaid on Sep 1, 2008 5:53 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
i hope williams is ready for prime-time
paymah never impressed me, ever. but he also has little trade value, i know. let’s see what we get for foxy before we weigh that. i hope it is a player that can help out this season, though
by davecheffy on Sep 1, 2008 6:37 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
My dad and I
had a conversation about this last night. Props to him in that he knew something was going to happen to Foxy soon.
Out of five CBs on the roster, Foxworth was the third best, ahead of Paymah and Williams. But they are all to good to cut and 5 is too many to carry so something has to give in order to absorb the need for roster balance among the rest of the positions and salary cap considerations, especially next year. When it comes to a trade, it takes two to tango, so you are obligated to put the most value that you can risk on the table. That means Foxworth.
When it comes to evaluating who will help the team more, it is obvious we get more value out of Paymah and Williams than we do out of Foxy, even though he is the better corner. The problem is, like Holland, he is too good to be missing 40%+ of the plays in a game. This is yet another great move by the Broncos front office: Foxy willl get to start somewhere, and get paid for the player he is instead of the player we need him to be, and the Broncos are going to reap some serious value from a trade, that helps balance this roster.
Lastly, to analyze Foxy’s play, someone above said that he was more suited to a cover-2 or zone scheme. Absolutely right. With Bly and Champ being Aces in man coverage (which is a rarity to have two that can do it that well, so I am glad to see us taking advantage of it) we need our third and even fourth corner to be able to play man. Foxy could play man, but he is a physical mismatch with 60% of the receivers in the league, whereas Paymah, even not being as skilled as Foxy, can effectively shut his guy down by being a mismatch with him.
The reason is that the passing game is a game of options. QBs have to make decisions so fast that just giving the impression of a mismatch is often enough to prevent the throw to your guy. That is why reading the play is so important for DBs: if they are in the right spot, the QB has to look at his next option, unless of course he spots a mismatch.
Foxy will be a huge help to a team, and we will not get stuck in a bidding battle to choose between him and Paymah next year, Jack Williams can be utilized, and we will get something of value that helps balance another position somewhere, either now or next year.
This is a 100% awesome trade…
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2008 6:40 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
How can you call it awesome
When we don’t even know with whom we’re trading?!
"I could never quite get the hang of Thursdays..."
by FlaBroncoFan on Sep 1, 2008 6:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We could get screwed, true
but I doubt it. I would expect us to get the slightly worse part of the deal, but that is because we are the ones who I think initiated trade talks with these teams. Going on recent history I don’t think the Broncos will bite on a deal that hurts them.
Worst case scenario we trade for a high-risk/reward player, but we have been conservative for so many moves that I would be willing to loosen up a bit and consider it, since the conservative approach seems to have netted us a decent buffer.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2008 7:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
risk/reward such as...
Shaun Cody?
"I could never quite get the hang of Thursdays..."
by FlaBroncoFan on Sep 1, 2008 7:49 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm doing a little research on him
he is an unknown to me…
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2008 7:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
2nd round pick out of USC four years ago. I assume he played alongside Eagles DT Mike Patterson who was a 1st rounder that same year I believe. Patterson is a better player, no doubt, though not as big as Cody.
"I could never quite get the hang of Thursdays..."
by FlaBroncoFan on Sep 1, 2008 8:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'LL TAKE HIM
Sorry about the emphasis, but this is exactly the kind of player I would be loking for witha trade. It is high risk/reward, and suits the rest of my criteria perfectly: young and a DT that would provide a hedge or option if Marcus Thomas wasn’t a go.
The risk is that while he has been ok against the run with detroit, he hasn’t been penetrating and getting into the backfield against the pass.
the reward is that, like Thomas, he came into the league as a high motor, one gap penetrating DT.
Some thoughts on why he is a relative unknown:
1. He played in detroit.
2. Marinelli is a good defensive coach, but I think he plays with hsi guys from a position standpoint way too much. He likes lighter penetrating DTs, yet he lines them up like NTs. Cody got lined up as a nosetackle a lot, where he hasn’t had the impact expected of him. We have heard this before.
3. He wasn’t an unknown his rookie year. He came on very strong, and the sky looked to be the limit with him. Remember that it takes Dlineen a couple of years to get into the swing of things.
4. He dislocated his toe in 2006 (2nd year) he was inactive for about five games, practicing and trying to come back (he has a heck of a motor and will play through pain), but after returningagaisnt arizona that year he reinjured the toe and got IRed.
5. he never got going in 2007. Between switching between being an ‘undertackle’ and a NT he never got a head of steam. In an interview he said he was hesitating, and that he thought he was tentative because psychologically he wasn’t over the injury.
6. I think that a fresh start in Denver could see the reward side of the equation come through. Even if it doesn’t pan out completely, he would be a young, adequate run stopper, and thus a building block for this defense moving forward.
If this is the trade we are considering, I say go for it.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2008 8:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am watching some plays
from the 3rd detroit preseason game (torrents rock).
He is getting good pressure, and I think he might be ready to take the next step and reclaim his path to being a better player. And what kind of a revitalizing step would it be if he got to take it in Denver, working for a player’s coach with a lot of up and coming youth around him?
He needs to remember what it is like being on a successful team that depends on you…
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2008 9:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd imagine most
defensive players would flourish in Detroit, with Merinelli being a Tampa-2 man. The Bucs never seem to have a bad D, and same goes for the Colts… I can’t think of a single Tampa-2 team without a great D… unless KC counts… maybe…
"I could never quite get the hang of Thursdays..."
by FlaBroncoFan on Sep 1, 2008 9:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Detroit is the land of the "yeah, but"s
The GM was asking his coaches to work with extremely lopsided rosters, with tons of playmakers here and nothing over there. I can’t speak for much more about detroit, as I do my best not to follow them… :)
I wonder if they will confirm the rumor that they are looking at this trade? I would like to think that these last two hours haven’t been for naught, what with everybody putting their thoughts in on Cody….
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2008 9:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you styg.
I’m all for this trade, even though you don’t want to lose one of your stand up, “good guys”. You have to make the move for value reasons, if you feel you’re going to lose him at the end of the season anyway.
by donbok1 on Sep 1, 2008 6:49 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
100% awesome?
You’re telling me that if Bly or Bailey go down then you’re comfortable with Paymah or WIlliams stepping in as starting corner?
This is a boneheaded trade unless we get someone who adds real value immediately (i.e. LB, or DL).
Furthermore, I can’t imagine that the timing and the way this was handled has been good for team morale. Foxy was a very popular player amongst his team mates.
I’m really having a hard time seeing this as 100% awesome (12.8% at most)!
by UnarmingMermaid on Sep 1, 2008 7:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd give it a 56.9% Awesome.
I like Foxy, but Champ and Bly are better. Bly might not be popular among the blogoshpere at this point, but he is a ballhawk and a shut down guy who capitalizes by playing opposite Champ. Foxy was the best nickel man in the league, and now he’ll gat a chance to be where he belongs: the starting lineup. Hopefully the GMs see enough upside in him to give up someone who can be a starting caliber LB or DT.
I could be wrong, but I believe a Raider is an old, old wooden ship that was used during the Civil War era.
by papigrande on Sep 1, 2008 7:12 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I would be comfortable
with Paymah starting. The dropoff from Champ or Bly would be so steep that I think the defensive scheme would even change a little, perhaps favoring a zone or something. Even if it didn’t, I would be fine with Paymah in man coverage, he makes a good matchup. Williams as a starting nickle back would be great, not just fine. Once he gets settled into the game, I’m betting he would dominate his guy off of the line in press coverage. There is some risk there, but I think it suits our 3rd down defense perfectly.
As to immediate value, I’m not sure that would be needed, though I think it would be easier to make a comparison if we do a player for player trade. i would be fine with a draft pick too though. What I would like least is a low-ball player and a low-round pick. Foxy is definitely worth more than that and the trade shouldn’t go through if those are the terms. I would take a DE or DT but that is it. We have LBs coming out of our ears. And I would want a young player, around the same age as Foxy. What I wouldn’t want is a run-stopping DT. We have one in Powell, and when he comes back we don’t want a redundancy in that area or we are just trading one quagmire for another. I would take a backup quality penetrating one gapper that could backup DRob and help us hedge against a failure in Marcus Thomas.
Remember that we had awesome CB depth at the expense of depth in other areas of the roster. The 3 CBs we drafted were the LBs and DTs that we didn’t draft and develop. With the addition (and likely success) of Williams we compounded that void and it needs to be balanced soon, while we still have a chance and the players involved are still a high value, not just to others, but to us as well. If we wait for our depth to be less valuable to us, we will have waited too long.
As to the possibility of locker room discontent over this, I think the opposite of what you say may be the case. The team loves foxy so much, and his teammates have so much respect for him that I think everyone will be excited and relieved for him, finally getting an opportunity to start somewhere. And by keeping Foxy informed of the situation I think the rest of the players will get the feeling that if they give their best as a Bronco, if the day comes when they may get traded, they can expect the same classy treatment.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2008 8:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Player or pick?
I think a draft pick would be fine, especially if we want to get one of the stud MLB’s in next year’s draft. We’ll need all the picks we can get in case we need to move up to the top ten range where Laurinitis(Ohio St.) and Maualuga(USC) may be picked.
by donbok1 on Sep 1, 2008 6:43 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Mauy or Laury
being from NorCal I’m pulling for Rey Maualuga, but I’d be thrilled with either. Imagine our LB corps in ‘09 with DJ, Mauy/Laury, and Wesley W.? Speed we haven’t seen since Mobley, Al, and Ian.
by donbok1 on Sep 1, 2008 7:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That gives me a....
well, you know. That would be awesome!! That with Champ and Bly, with Barret over the top, we’d be a top 5 pass defense for years to come.
I could be wrong, but I believe a Raider is an old, old wooden ship that was used during the Civil War era.
by papigrande on Sep 1, 2008 7:14 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Papi
why do you sound so smart being so young?…;)
Broncos broncos everywhere and all the league did blink,
Broncos broncos everywhere think moldy faiders stink!
by Mike Clark on Sep 1, 2008 7:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I love both of these
last names. And the players are okay too.
"I could never quite get the hang of Thursdays..."
by FlaBroncoFan on Sep 1, 2008 6:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's a spelling bee.
Too bad it looks like Niko Koutouvides isn’t working.
I could be wrong, but I believe a Raider is an old, old wooden ship that was used during the Civil War era.
by papigrande on Sep 1, 2008 7:14 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think Niko will be fine
Broncos broncos everywhere and all the league did blink,
Broncos broncos everywhere think moldy faiders stink!
by Mike Clark on Sep 1, 2008 7:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
better be help now
If the trade ends up being for immediate front 7 help of comparable value to foxworth, I say go for it. A nickelback of foxworth’s caliber is a luxury and one that we don’t absolutely need if we can fill a more urgent need instead.
On the other hand, Foxworth does give us solid CB/S and would have been useful to have around. If the trade ends up being just for a draft pick, then it looks more questionable to me. My two cents anyway.
by bushwah on Sep 1, 2008 6:44 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I hate to see foxy go--but I trust Shanny knows what he's doing--I hope we get at least a 3rd round next year....
if it is less than that….there must be a reason.
Broncos broncos everywhere and all the league did blink,
Broncos broncos everywhere think moldy faiders stink!
by Mike Clark on Sep 1, 2008 7:15 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow I can't believe the rumour I just heard on the radio
It was leaked that the Lions are talking to the Broncos and the traded offered was Shaun Cody for Foxworth
he played DT for the lions but never panned out, but he was a standout DE at USC……huge move if we get Cody my guess is he’d be tried at DE first.
by KevinJames3 on Sep 1, 2008 7:22 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
that's it?
Just Cody? Crap. I want more than that! Besides, Detroit has Leigh Bodden (who still isn’t a starter there) Brian Kelly (Who they love) and Travis Fisher (meh…). Cody isn’t even strting on their D right now! Even with Shaun Rodgers gone to Cleveland!
"I could never quite get the hang of Thursdays..."
by FlaBroncoFan on Sep 1, 2008 7:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree--we need a player and a draft pick.
Broncos broncos everywhere and all the league did blink,
Broncos broncos everywhere think moldy faiders stink!
by Mike Clark on Sep 1, 2008 8:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
unless Foxy has said he wants out--Shanny would respct this.
Broncos broncos everywhere and all the league did blink,
Broncos broncos everywhere think moldy faiders stink!
by Mike Clark on Sep 1, 2008 8:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Judging by Foxy's
quote, I don’t think the trade was his idea.
"I could never quite get the hang of Thursdays..."
by FlaBroncoFan on Sep 1, 2008 8:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bodden
will be starting some time this year, and Fisher will be gone. DET has two corners… that’s it.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2008 9:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Foxworth for Cody...
…would be a major dissapointment.
From a brief search on the guy it’s clear that he is pretty much considered a major draft bust after the Lions traded up to get him in the 2nd round in 2005. We do not need another DL guy who is on the brink of being considered a draft debacle.
He seems to lack any real desire to be a great NFL player. I really hope this is just a rumor!
by UnarmingMermaid on Sep 1, 2008 8:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
he also
cares more about himself than he does about teammates (See: Papigrande’s research below)
"I could never quite get the hang of Thursdays..."
by FlaBroncoFan on Sep 1, 2008 8:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is always
more to the story.
In Cody’s case, he was fulfilling his college promise (he was getting into the backfield on passing downs, which is what we would be looking at him to ideally do), but an injury (dislocated toe) seems to have chronically derailed him.
I think he is healthy now, buried in a roster that has had to move on without him. the only question is whther psychologically he is ready to move foward and start giving it 100% again. he played his entire college career as an enthusiastic high motor guy, and I for one can’t put too much blame on him for losing that fire while dealing with an injury in Detroit of all places.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2008 8:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
^Cody isn't even being used right.......
Foxworth isn’t a starter either…….can’t be picky
by KevinJames3 on Sep 1, 2008 7:32 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Cody seems like an "I" Player to me.
He starred on a Spike TV show called Super Agent, where various agents competed to construct his contract. WTH?! He has a tattoo of his name on his arm, and his website is shauncody75.com.
However, according to his Myspace, which is set to private, he is a Barack Obama fan, so he can’t be that bad, right Zap? ;)
I could be wrong, but I believe a Raider is an old, old wooden ship that was used during the Civil War era.
by papigrande on Sep 1, 2008 8:22 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Jesus
I do NOT want this guy after reading all that. (No opinion on the politics, I meant everything else you typed.) Besides, the only good sport-related show on Spike is Pros vs Joes.
"I could never quite get the hang of Thursdays..."
by FlaBroncoFan on Sep 1, 2008 8:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The tatoo says "SC"
and is in the font of the USC logo. He tlaked about the tatoo at one time, and he said he got it when he signed his papers to go to USC. He mentioned that he liked the fact that it had a double meaning, but that because it was in the USC font, he guessed “people will probably be able to guess its real meaning.”
And if I watched football based on political affiliation I probably wouldn’t watch football. :)
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2008 8:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
There's wikipedia for you.
It said the tattoo was of his initials, which are also SC. It’s changed now… did you do that? I was kidding about the Obama thing; Zappa being the nonconformist that he is doesn’t seem to like him or McCain, and I thought I might be able to get a reaction out of him.
I could be wrong, but I believe a Raider is an old, old wooden ship that was used during the Civil War era.
by papigrande on Sep 1, 2008 8:49 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
HEH
to get the best reaction out of Zappa just get on Ron Paul’s bad side.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2008 8:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cut him some slack...he could be good for us.
Long time USC fan.
He is only 25, was a very agressive and disruptive player for USC, and a good team leader for them
He is a better DE than a DT, and NEVER suited Detroit’s style.
I maybe the lone voice here, but I think he would be a great tandem with Doom. People grow up and change and I think as part of a young squad like us, and with the help of EE adn Dewayne Robertson, he will do well for us.
Werd!
by boydy2669 on Sep 1, 2008 8:51 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you
but I think we would do fine to keep him at DT. I think he is weighing in at 290-300 these days, which could be a little light, but I think he would be at his personal best rushing the interior at the lighter weight.
Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2008 8:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed Styg
In our system which should see a lot more movement I could see this for sure Styg. With him, Thomas and Robertson rotating, and I would not be surprised to see him throiwn to End sometimes too, we would never give the opposite O Line a rest.
by boydy2669 on Sep 1, 2008 9:02 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/sep/01/broncos-add-lowry-release-rogers/
In this article it is saying Denver is expected to bring back G Dylan Gandy after Foxy is traded. Plus the Raiders acquired Ashley Lelie. Hahahaha, can’t wait to see what he doesn’t do Monday night.
by rynoz71 on Sep 1, 2008 9:51 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I trust Shanny.
I’ll be happy with whatever trade value we get.
We have been making a lot of good moves the last year or so. So I think this will turn out for the good too.
Lets just see what happens.
by The Gun Young on Sep 1, 2008 10:04 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
OMG!
Foxy traded for a seventh round pick to Atlanta?? Possible additional 6th rounder if he resigns with Atl after this year. A seventh and a sixth makes it seem like we just got owned. We got worked on that one. So hope this is a joke, or just plain wrong. :(
by donbok1 on Sep 1, 2008 11:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
dang
Better than losing him for nothing but not exactly what I thought they could get, and it sucks massively if he decides to sign with someone else next year.
by Colinski on Sep 2, 2008 5:28 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
They were going to lose him to free agency next year anyway.
He wanted to start so in order to get something they traded him.
To have striven, to have made the effort, to have been true to certain ideals - this alone is worth the struggle. - William Penn
Tom Arnold, of Fox Sports Net's Best Damn Sports Show Period, said this about Warren Sapp: "Hey, Warren, the Raiders signed you to a seven-year deal. I guess Bill Callahan was right --- they are the dumbest team in America."
by Philistine21 on Sep 2, 2008 6:52 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


























