Mile High Report: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



New Blog: Five For Howling - for Coyotes fans Bar-right-arrows



spread the word

Denver Broncos Behind The Numbers - The Difference Between 2-0 and 2-0

I don't know about you, but I am ready to move on from Ref-Gate and get the focus back on the football field and "The Quest".  The Broncos have gotten out of the gate fast and sit at 2-0, with both wins coming in the AFC West, a huge advantage as we head through the rest of the season. 

With the off-day today, however, I thought I would take a look at the 2007 Broncos who also started the season 2-0 and had all of our hopes on high.  Knowing how the season turned out in '07 will likely shade your memory on how you felt after 2 wins last September, but with everyone booking their trips to Tampa for February I felt it best to take a look back and compare what we saw then to what we see now.

Let's start by taking a look back at the two games the Broncos won starting 2007 -

Buffalo -- The Broncos started 2007 in Buffalo before playing a home game against the Raiders.  Buffalo was a team that many thought might challenge for a wild card spot, though there were questions about J.P. Losman at quarterback.  In the end, those concerns were justified as Losman was only able to throw for 97 yards.  The game was marred, of course, by the Kevin Everett injury, which overshadowed a solid performance by Jay Cutler, making his first opening day start. The Broncos struggled getting into the end zone, scoring just once on a Jay Cutler to Brandon Marshall TD pass. 

Despite and solid defensive effort, the Bills had the lead late on the shoulders of a Roscoe Parrish punt return and a 23-yard run by rookie RB Marshawn Lynch.  Cutler was able to rally the Broncos in the final minutes, however, and Jason Elam kicked a game-winning 48-yard field goal as time expired to get the Broncos the win.

Buffalo was decimated by injuries in 2007 and ended up making a change at quarterback, going with Trent Edwards over Losman and finished 7-9.  The Bills have started this season 2-0 and look like they will be a tough ouot for anyone in the AFC East.

Star-divide

Oakland -- The Raiders were up next for the Broncos, coming off a bad loss to the Detroit Lions at home.  Lane Kiffin was in his 2nd game as Coach in Oakland and the match up between the old Mastermind and the young offensive Guru was highly touted. 

Early on, it didn't look like it was going to be a game at all with the Broncos dominating play.  Denver jumped out to a 17-3 lead at halftime behind a Jay Cutler to Brandon Stokley TD pass and a 4-yard run by Cecil Sapp.  It appeared the Broncos were going to put the game out of reach in the 3rd quarter when Cutler connected with Brandon Marshall for a 25-yard touchdown, but the play was called back by a penalty.  The Broncos missed the field goal and the Raiders were right back in the game. 

After a 46-yard TD catch by Jerry Porter, the Raiders used an onside kick to regain possession and the Broncos were on their heels.  After a Gerrard Warren sack of Jay Cutler in the end zone, Thomas Howard actually gave the Raiders the lead when he intercepted Cutler and ran it back 44-yards for a touchdown.  Once again, Jay Cutler was asked to bring the team back.  He did, with the Broncos kicking a game-tying 20-yard field goal, sending the game to OT.

In Overtime, the Broncos appeared to have lost the game when Sebastian Janikowski drilled a long field goal, only to find out Mike Shanahan had called a time out.  SeaBass missed his next effort and the Broncos were able to take advantage with Jason Elam kicking the game winning field goal.  The Broncos had stolen victory from the jaws of defeat two weeks in a row and sat at 2-0, alone in first place in the AFC West.

Hopefully that is a good history lesson.  At this point last season the Broncos were in the exact same spot as they are now - 2-0, 1st place in the AFC West.  There were question marks on defense, but hey, a win is a win and 2-0 was the most important thing.  We know how 2-0 finished off last season, with the Broncos going 7-9 and missing the playoffs.  Here we are today, with questions about the defense, but at 2-0 that is the most important this.  Is there reason to be concerned?

Let's start with the very general, the schedule. 

The record of the 14 opponents the Broncos played after 2 weeks last season was 16-12.  Five of those opponents were 2-0 after two weeks, while three were 0-2.

This season, the record of the 14 opponents the Broncos play after Week 2 is not nearly as good - 10-18, with only  three of our remaining opponents also undefeated.  Conversely, six of the Broncos remaining opponents are 0-2 heading into week 3.

Based on that, the appearance would be the Bronco play an easier final 14 games than they did back in 2007.  (There was much rejoice......Yaaay.)

Now let's look at some stats after 2 games.  First, here is what Jay Cutler's numbers look like after two games -

2007 Comp. Attempts Yards Comp % TD INT
Jay Cutler 46 72 573 63.9% 2 4
2008 Comp. Attempts Yards Comp % TD INT
Jay Cutler 52 74 650 70.3% 6 1

The numbers are pretty similar, with 1 glaring exception - TD/INT ratio.  Last year, Cutler was already throwing INT's at a 2/1 clip.  He finished out the season strong, however, flipping that number the other way(18 TD / 10 INT).  This season, however, Cutler is protecting the ball much better, with a 6/1 TD/INT ratio.  The result?  A much better, more efficient quarterback.

What about the entire offense?  Let's look at total offense, along with points scored -

2007 Rush Pass Total Points
Offense 352 559 911 38

2008 Rush Pass Total Points
Offense 286 650 936 80

Again, the numbers aren't that different, except for points scored. IT shows the growth and maturity of an offense, specifically at quarterback. The Broncos moved the ball up and down the field in 2007 but couldn't score touchdowns. In 2008, Jay Cutler is getting the ball in the end zone.

How about the defense?  There is an excellent post about the defensive problems the Broncos face, and there is surely going to be more talk about it, especially if the Broncos keep winning.  Let's look at the defense through 2 game in 2007 and 2008 -

 

2007 Rush Pass Total Points
Defense 312 125 437 34

2008 Rush Pass Total Points
Defense 230 498 728 52

At first glance, it would look like the Broncos defense is getting worse. The numbers are a bit misleading, however, and while there is a need for some adjustments, a definitive conclusion cannot be made.

I thing the 2008 Broncos defense has proven is they struggle once the offense gives them a lead of 17 points or more.  The Broncos jumped out to a 27-0 lead before allowing the Raiders to score, in the 4th quarter, and the Broncos took a 21-3 lead before the Chargers were able to get back into the game.  The Chargers were also helped by the Sproles kick-off return. 

Truth is, the Broncos defense has given up 17 points in the first half of football games this season.  They seem to start strong.  Secondly, against the Chargers, in a game that was still in doubt, they were able to force San Diego into kicking two short field goals while the offense could get it going.  Yes, the defense has given up some big plays, but when they needed to pick up the offense in the late 3rd/early 4th quarter, in a game that was close at the time, they did the job.

Yes, there were breakdowns, but the Chargers are a solid offensive team, a team that has won a lot of games the past 4 years.  Looking at the competition, I feel the Broncos have actually done a nice job learning how to play with a big lead, which can be tough.  Yes, there are adjustments that need to be made, but the Raiders are arguably a better offensive team than they were in 2007, and the Broncos defense did a solid job.

I guess what this is all about, all things being eqaul, I feel much better about the 2008 version of the 2-0 Denver Broncos than the 2007 version.  The competition has been tougher, and most importantly, in a League that is dominated by quarterback play, the Broncos offense and quarterback are playing at a MUCH HIGHER LEVEL than at this time last season.  That, alone, will be able to overcome alot of defensive shortcomings and will help the Broncos avoid a repeat of the 5-9 finish to the season.

Poll
Are You Concerned About The 2008 Broncos Defense?
Yes...We could be in trouble
359 votes
Nope....It's only been two weeks, they'll come around.
171 votes

530 votes | Poll has closed

2 recs | Comment 56 comments | Digg!

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I couldn't have said it better myself!

I think the poll will be a moot question. Only Charger and Raider fans will be voting for 2007. :P

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08

I got a high ankle sprain in college and it still hurts! ~ TSG 8/13/08

by Zappa on Sep 16, 2008 12:01 PM MDT   0 recs

Yeah really...

There is only One Moment—this moment—the Eternal Moment of Now

by sirsam on Sep 16, 2008 12:05 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Poll has been changed....

-TSG

SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport

Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com

by TheSportsGuru on Sep 16, 2008 12:10 PM MDT   0 recs

Ahhh...much more intriguing this time around.

Already its a split decision. Like the 2000 Presidential election.

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08

I got a high ankle sprain in college and it still hurts! ~ TSG 8/13/08

by Zappa on Sep 16, 2008 12:34 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

well, not the voting is lop sided.

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08

I got a high ankle sprain in college and it still hurts! ~ TSG 8/13/08

by Zappa on Sep 16, 2008 1:15 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

*NOW the voting is lop sided

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08

I got a high ankle sprain in college and it still hurts! ~ TSG 8/13/08

by Zappa on Sep 16, 2008 1:16 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

too early

to say the defense is horrible. This is really starting to chap my ass

Love is a razor and I have walked the line on that silver blade

by broncfanstuckinsd on Sep 16, 2008 1:17 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Go watch the video I posted today....

that is the accurate depiction of our defense “so far” this year. I’m not saying we can’t recover, but dayum!

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08

I got a high ankle sprain in college and it still hurts! ~ TSG 8/13/08

by Zappa on Sep 16, 2008 1:38 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Our pass defense was bad in 2007

and isn’t looking too good in 2008. That’s probably due to the continued lack of a dominant pass rush. I think we were ninth in the league in sacks last year when adjusted for the number of times other teams passed, but I suspect a lot of those were coverage sacks. Our secondary has been supporting the pass rush more than vice versa. The run defense appears to be somewhat better, albeit not as much better as the preseason indicated. But we’ve faced two very good rushing teams so far, so it’s possible we’ve made more progress than the stats show. The big difference so far is the offense is so much better. We’re doing much better in the red zone on both offense and defense. Last year
we played worse than our stats. We couldn’t make the big play on offense and gave up to many big plays on defense. I see that as a reflection of how dysfunctional last year’s team was. This year we’re doing a much better job of making key plays, especially on offense but even on defense as shown by our red zone performance against the Chargers. That’s what kept us in the game when they were moving the ball easily. Given our defensive deficiencies I think 10-6 or maybe 11-5 is still a reasonable expectation.

"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen

by spock on Sep 16, 2008 12:48 PM MDT   0 recs

Your logic is true

"How do the berries taste Ralph?" Bart Simpson
"They taste like burning." Ralph Wigam
Broncoman

by Broncoman on Sep 16, 2008 1:29 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm worried about the defense...

However, I really don’t think that Shanahan will sit around and allow as much time to Slowik as he did for Bates without demanding a scheme change! I would be very surprised if we don’t see a very different looking defensive scheme against the Saints.

by UnarmingMermaid on Sep 16, 2008 12:56 PM MDT   0 recs

How would you change the scheme?

The problem is that we are built for a penetrating 4-3 defense with doing zone-blitzes, obviously last years Bates experience really hampered us this year beacuse we got rid of guys that fit our scheme this year in search of the Sam Adams of the world, I think you can change how much you blitz and so forth, but if the front four can’t get pressure and penetrate consistently, then it will be tough on CB and S, because a good NFL QB is going to be able to pick us apart. I think if we improve on the running game, and realize our pass defense is going to be strained, then that’s probably going to be the best we can hope for this year. Basically we are going to have to gamble more and accept that we will get burned, but we should generate some good plays on defense also.

"How do the berries taste Ralph?" Bart Simpson
"They taste like burning." Ralph Wigam
Broncoman

by Broncoman on Sep 16, 2008 1:35 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

I posted this in response to Sakysak's "Stating the Obvious..." post:

Great Post… I do have one argument! Playing a "bend but don’t break" defense is exactly want we do not want to do!!! The only way this defense is going to be an "impact" defense is to try to force big plays by creative and exotic blitz packages and coverage schemes (similiar to Coyer and Robinson’s defenses). We do not have the personel to create pressure with the front four (wish we did but we don’t) and therefore must compensate with creative playcalling (like the offense is doing to overcome a relatively weak run blocking line). We will give up big plays with this system; however, we should create big plays as well!

by UnarmingMermaid on Sep 16, 2008 1:52 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't know if there is a scheme to change.

I just think we need to go back to being aggressive. Slowik, I think, was scared of the Chargers and game planned accordingly. Instead of the fast, attacking defense we put on the field Week 1…we played timidly and didn’t blitz. The result was catastrophic. I think Slowik needs to go back to the all or nothing strategy of Week 1. :)

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08

I got a high ankle sprain in college and it still hurts! ~ TSG 8/13/08

by Zappa on Sep 16, 2008 1:39 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Good points

I think the defense is going to have to be aggresive and try to get turnovers and live with the fact that we may have the worst pass defense at the end of the year because teams are trying to come back on us and throwing the ball all of the time, but if we can take the run game away as an option and force teams to be one dimensional, then we will do fine in the long run, all though statisically it may be ugly.

"How do the berries taste Ralph?" Bart Simpson
"They taste like burning." Ralph Wigam
Broncoman

by Broncoman on Sep 16, 2008 1:45 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

I'll take statiscally ugly wins over any kind of loss.

Hell, the blitzing will generate turnovers for us. The JaMarcus Russell fumble was generated by pressure…

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08

I got a high ankle sprain in college and it still hurts! ~ TSG 8/13/08

by Zappa on Sep 16, 2008 1:51 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

I noticed this as well.

The D during the first 2 quarters of the Raiders game look good – there we are couple little screen things that worked against them but we were getting pressure. Then we move into a more timid D in the 3rd and 4th. That timid D is what we played the whole game against SD.

Now we did get the win and I am very happy about that. However, if the D steps up we could have put the chargers to bed at the half not with last second prayers.

Over all I am not worried about the D players we have on the roster. However the aggressive vs timid D play calling. We have the offensive to create big leads. This is a D Lineman’s dream. It leave lots of opportunity to pass rush. Let loose the hounds! Seem like everyone is playing contain. Lets try staying aggressive for 4 quarter and see what happens. We all know the timid thing isn’t keeping points off the board.

Go Slowik…. Show us what we really can do on D.

My image is the Circa 1960-’61 Broncos home uniform sock. Some what folk lore to me ... but referred to as the clown sock by my Dad.

by YellowStoneBronco on Sep 17, 2008 11:05 AM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Actually, the defense has been decent most of the time.

They need to stop the big plays. For instance, until Fargas ripped off that 48-yard TD run late in the game, the Raiders had managed only a 2.9 YPC.

What did the Chargers do? Four long TDs. They couldn’t seem to consistently mount sustained drives against the defense. However, that actually exposed Denver’s relatively effete pass rush. A pass defense begins with a pass rush. Period.

A good example is what happened to the Broncos, Chargers, and Raiders CBs the past two weeks. Even though they are reputed to be perhaps the best three tandems in the league, all three were torched during that period. At the same time, none of the three benefitted much from a pass rush.

If the Broncos can muster up just one more D-lineman who can complement Dumervil’s pass rush, I think we’ll see quite a different defense.

Never pass up the opportunity to keep your mouth shut. - my daddy

by AZDynamics on Sep 16, 2008 1:10 PM MDT   0 recs

does that mean

we have a Break but do not Bend defense?

:)

by poorboywilly on Sep 16, 2008 2:47 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't buy these "subtract this play or that play and..." arguments!!!

It’s like saying “take away 10 of their points and we would’ve won”!

by UnarmingMermaid on Sep 16, 2008 3:37 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

I understand that argument

On the other hand, look at it this way. Which is easier to fix – giving up big plays or giving up 10+ play TD drives?

by MattR on Sep 16, 2008 3:48 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

They R equal. because if it takes a team ten plays to score vs. 1, then the O is right back out there.

They get tired too. Granted the D, reacting to a play, gets worn down sooner then the O, because the O knows where the play is going. Then the D has to react. It takes more energy to react then to create. On the big quick play the D gets an extra rest. Whitch is easier to fix? The ten play touchdown. You have a lot more time to create a turnover.

The problem is that you have to have a well rounded defense to pull it off! Pass rush Pass rush Pass rush! The 2, “one play for a touchdown plays”, that we saw Sunday, happened on special teams and a "short yardage throw underneith, if I’m not mistaken, and on that play it looked to me like a fantastic call by SD reading our D set up. They must have seen something because our D looked to be totally out of position!

by metalman5050 on Sep 16, 2008 6:07 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't know the answer to my own question

I can come up with argument for each side and it really depends on what the underlying cause is in each case.

by MattR on Sep 16, 2008 10:17 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Thanks for saying that

I’ve been thinking the same thing. The average is the average, and usually includes a smattering of big runs as well as losses
or no gains. Sure, if that big gain hadn’t happened their average would have been lower, and if that big loss hadn’t happened it would have been higher. Bottom line: if we had an elite run defense that big run wouldn’t have happened, or would have been counterbalanced by lots of no gains and behind the line stops.

"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen

by spock on Sep 16, 2008 9:00 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

So far a little improvement

The 2008 defense is better than the 2007, but not by much and they were really bad last year. We still miss Al Wilson, big time. I’d really like to see us draft a MLB next year, even moving up in the draft if we have to (we have been stock piling picks, so we have the ammo).

That said, I think our D is young and will get better as the season goes.

Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960

by Darin H on Sep 16, 2008 1:12 PM MDT   0 recs

MLB

I think this is on top of all of our wish lists. However, If Moss and Crowder don’t step it up we will need a play maker at End as well. Not to mention a replacement for D.Rob as his knees will not last forever. Powell will be back. But I would like a hedged bet there as we always rotate. I am feeling pretty good about SAF now. That said I think MLB is our main target for 1st round.

My image is the Circa 1960-’61 Broncos home uniform sock. Some what folk lore to me ... but referred to as the clown sock by my Dad.

by YellowStoneBronco on Sep 17, 2008 11:43 AM MDT to parent up   0 recs

agreed

regarding DTL as far as roster space goes, we are deactivating one or two and even three Dlinemen every game. One elite DT would fit in nicely and make Clemons and Shaw expendable, while helping his ends immensely.

Mountains, forest, sea: these render man fierce, but yet do not destroy the man.

by styg50 on Sep 17, 2008 1:12 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Special Teams are my concern. . .

Two games and two huge returns against our special teams – Nothing can change momentum in a game like a quick return score.

by cuprite on Sep 16, 2008 1:15 PM MDT   0 recs

Every year

Seems like every year our (new) defensive coordinator claims they’ll be more aggressive this time around. More blitzes. More pressure on the opposing QB. I’m pretty sure I heard those words before this season started. What’d I see? Three-man defensive line, dropping everyone else in coverage, which resulted quite a few times in touchdowns for the other team. Every year it’s the same old. So is Jarvis Moss officially a bust now that he’s not playing? Saw Crowder out there on Sunday, but no sign of Moss … yet again. I assume he was not active for the game?

by GaryP on Sep 16, 2008 1:24 PM MDT   0 recs

I think all D-coordinators have to say the same thing

We will be more aggresive, we will stop the run, we will get to the QB and cause turnovers, which is basically what every defense is supposed to do to begin with. It would be funny if one came out and said, yes we will play it conservative, give up long drives, and hopefully hold the opposing team to FGs.

"How do the berries taste Ralph?" Bart Simpson
"They taste like burning." Ralph Wigam
Broncoman

by Broncoman on Sep 16, 2008 1:38 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Jarvis

Is looking more and more like a B-U-S-T to me. It bothers me to say it but I haven’t even seen flashes this year of him being a starter let alone an impact player.

"There's one thing I want you to do for me. Win. Win!" - Rocky II

by MileHighFros on Sep 16, 2008 5:16 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

It is worrisome

but just remember, Drew Brees was pretty much considered a bust after three years and then he suddenly found himself in his
fourth year (I think it was).

"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen

by spock on Sep 16, 2008 9:04 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Defensive problem

I am worried about the defense and I think it has as much to do with the coaching as the personnel. Where are our blitzes? I thought we were going to a more aggressive style that the Broncos of the late 90s, early 00s used?

The pass rush still isn’t there…I think everyone would agree with that. And I’d be interested to know what the blitz ratio is. Our D is getting torn when we only rush 4. If we’re going to get torn anyway, bring in the blitz packages and take a chance! The 98 and 99 Bronco defenses weren’t shut down units…they were aggressive and opportunistic. They let some big plays go when they got caught on their blitz packages, but oftentimes they got pressure / sacks / turnovers.

PRESSURE! I’m not saying blitz the house every down, but start bringing it 2/3 of the time and keep the O-line guessing as to where it is coming from!

Who’s with me?…someone get this post to Slowik! =)

by sadaraine on Sep 16, 2008 1:37 PM MDT   0 recs

What was interesting to me...

is that when the Broncos got a lead against SD the defense got VERY conservative…which allowed SD to easily get back into the game. I think an early lead like that allows a defense to start to take chances to put the game away. That’s when we should really start bringing it to make sure a team like SD doesn’t have the opportunity to work their way back into the game.

by UnarmingMermaid on Sep 16, 2008 1:58 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

You are correct

I agree we need to put the foot on the gas when we get up on teams, the more pressure we can exert the better, I hate the play it safe mode when you are up, maybe if it is 49-10 in the 4th quarter, but otherwise, bring the house and live with it if you get burned.

"How do the berries taste Ralph?" Bart Simpson
"They taste like burning." Ralph Wigam
Broncoman

by Broncoman on Sep 16, 2008 3:32 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Great point

Exactly. Way too passive. I totally understand “Bend but don’t Break” prevent defenses at the end of half/game to force the opponent to chew clock, but that just doesn’t work as a standard. We need to find a way to keep our intensity up and defensively kick the opponents but good once we have them down.

by sadaraine on Sep 16, 2008 3:56 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm with you!

There were a couple of times that it looked like we brought the house, but the dolts O-Line was able to slow us down enough for Phyllis to get a quick pass off to whoever was in front of Paymah.

I didn’t see enough delayed blitzes or corner blitzes for my liking.

I’m hoping that when Doom is back at 100% things will change, but for now, I’m very concerned about the number of yards that we’re giving up on the pass.

"It's all over Fat Man" - Tom Jackson to John Madden 1977 AFC Championship Game

"I love your analysis of our team. Its kinda like watching a spider monkey trying to figure out a jar of peanuts.. you know whats going on.. you know whats in there, but to actually figure it out, is just a bit beyond your mental skills..."
- Bronco Dano

by DesertBroncoFan on Sep 16, 2008 2:17 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Exactly

If you’re going to be scorched either way, at least get scorched being aggressive.

by GaryP on Sep 16, 2008 2:27 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Apparently Paymah struggles in coverage, which is odd considering the job description, but maybe he would excel at blitzing!

by UnarmingMermaid on Sep 16, 2008 2:54 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

NO KIDDING!

GREAT point of view. I want to see it more often.

by metalman5050 on Sep 16, 2008 7:38 PM MDT to parent up   0 recs

70% say we're in trouble....

that’s surprising to say the least.

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08

I got a high ankle sprain in college and it still hurts! ~ TSG 8/13/08

by Zappa on Sep 16, 2008 2:56 PM MDT   0 recs

It seems to me

that both of the first two games of the past two years have contained controversy and possibly a little bit of good fortune. Controversy was definitely there in that second game against Oakland after Shanahan called the timeout. All the “experts” were wondering if the timeout should have been allowed and if the NFL should change that rule.

Sounds pretty familiar to what all the talking heads have been saying about the fumble this week…

by Greyson on Sep 16, 2008 3:40 PM MDT   0 recs

Defensive Concerns

I think we could be in trouble holding on to leads. We are doing better against the run i think because against San Diego i think we only gave up like 50-60 yards rushing.

Go Broncos!

by dbroncos78087 on Sep 16, 2008 3:54 PM MDT   0 recs

4 votes to buzz up

Mine is one of them. Thank you Guru for the comparrisons. I hadn’t really thought about it because I forgot that we won our first two last year. It’s an interesting look back and I certainly agree that this is a different team"all the way around." I certainly hope, and that is about all I can do from my desk top, that the coaching staff on the D and ST can make the nessessary adjustments to utilize the tallent that we have properly. So far, I’m not impressed.

The O, on the other hand…………….I’M VERY IMPRESSED.

by metalman5050 on Sep 16, 2008 5:41 PM MDT   0 recs

zoning out !!!!!!!!

what kind of crappy zone defense do the broncos play on third downs lately ? there always is some wide out breaks off his route ,finds a hole in the zone and the QB finds him every time. I hate it !

by broncosfaninphilly on Sep 16, 2008 6:15 PM MDT   0 recs

2007 to 2008 comparisons

It is obvious that most on the MHR feel the defense is a problem. I won’t entirely refute that but I will put forth that it may not be as bleak as it seems. In the Dallas preseason game last year the Dallas front lines, both offense and defense, threw our front lines around like rag dolls. This year they did not. We did not even have a prayer and we didn’t stop the run all year in 2007 simply because we were getting driven off the ball four and five yards every play even if we had eight or nine men in the box. This year our offensive line is doing a great job of pass protection and is continuing to improve in zone blocking. Our O line is already better than we were at our best all last year and we have reliable depth. While our D line has not put a great deal of pressure on J Russel or Phyllis (admit it guys, there was some pressure), they have held the line of scrimmage and are not getting totally physically overmatched. This year we have something to improve upon. Last year we did not and our only hope was to totally scrap our entire defensive scheme and regroup mid-year. We will not see that this year, we will see continued improvement.

That’s ok with me. We’re playing for wins, not media publicity....HT 9/11/08

by firstfan on Sep 16, 2008 8:40 PM MDT   1 recs

rec'd

"It's all over Fat Man" - Tom Jackson to John Madden 1977 AFC Championship Game

"I love your analysis of our team. Its kinda like watching a spider monkey trying to figure out a jar of peanuts.. you know whats going on.. you know whats in there, but to actually figure it out, is just a bit beyond your mental skills..."
- Bronco Dano

by DesertBroncoFan on Sep 17, 2008 8:41 AM MDT to parent up   0 recs

Time of Posession

Has anyone brought up time of possession yet? I think that would be a significant stat!

by ThatemW on Sep 17, 2008 3:54 PM MDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!