Mile High Report: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

The Denver Broncos Defense - The Truth About The Kansas City Loss

It seems like every week the same people say the same thing about the Broncos defense.  We hear how horrible they are, how they can't stop the run, how they can't defend the pass, how they can't put pressure on the quarterback.  Some of that is true, we all know that, but something has become a disturbing trend, something that continues to be overlooked.  Much of the problems with the defense start with the offense and special teams.  No, really, it does. 

Specifically against Kansas City, I'd go so far as to say the defense, for over 3 quarters, played as well as it did against the Raiders Week 1.  Unfortunately, the offense didn't give them much of a chance. What is certain is the Broncos defense is by no means a dominant defense in any facet, run defense, pass defense, pressuring the quarterback, none of it.  The defense as a group is average at best, but with the offense the Broncos put on the field this team should be able to win, unless the offense, the strength of the team, let's it down.  On Sunday, that is exactly what happened.

Take a look at the drive chart for the Chiefs on Sunday --

Star-divide

 

1st Quarter
Start
Time
Time
Poss
Drive
Began
# of
Plays
Net
Yards
Result
15:00 5:55 KC 11 9 84 Field Goal
08:24 3:46 DEN 26 7 23 Field Goal
01:16 3:36 KC 48 8 22 Missed FG

2nd Quarter
Start
Time
Time
Poss
Drive
Began
# of
Plays
Net
Yards
Result
08:53 2:59 KC 19 6 23 Punt
03:26 0:43 DEN 2 2 2 Touchdown
01:18 0:43 KC 20 3 4 Punt
00:11 0:11 KC 40 1 -1 End of Half
3rd Quarter
Start
Time
Time
Poss
Drive
Began
# of
Plays
Net
Yards
Result
12:13 3:30 KC 37 7 38 Field Goal
07:32 0:11 DEN 43 1 -2 Fumble
06:29 1:25 DEN 47 3 7 Punt
03:26 5:46 KC 27 10 73 Touchdown
4th Quarter
Start
Time
Time
Poss
Drive
Began
# of
Plays
Net
Yards
Result
07:58 4:09 DEN 49 7 34 Field Goal
02:06 0:29 DEN 43 3 43

Touchdown

A couple things stand out almost immediately. First, the Chiefs average starting field position was it's own 47 yardline. Think about that for a minute. The Chiefs had the ball 12 times in the game(not counting the drive right before halftime), and basically started every possession, on average, at midfield. Not Good.

Let's look a bit deeper.  First, a bit of my own opinion.  To me, solid kick-off ocverage is determined by where the opposition starts their possession after the kick.  In fact, the key to winning football games is winning the battle of field position.  Case in point are the 2006 and 2007 Broncos who were dead last in average starting field position.

Obviously, a touchback is the best case scenario, forcing a team to start at their own 20.  Not trying to be too diificult, I'll give the Broncos another 10 yards to play with and call any drive started by an opponent inside their own 30 is solid.  That forces a team to go 50-60 yards to reach the Broncos Red Zone.  5 to 6 first downs.   Tough going against any defense in the NFL, if you have to do it over and over again.  Let's look at it.

The Chiefs started offensive possessions inside their 30 yardline just 4 times out of 11 drives.  The results of those drives -- FG, Punt, Punt, TD.  10 Points Allowed.  Acceptable.  Let's give the Chiefs 10 more yards and look at possessions started inside their own 40.  Now there are 5 total possessions out of 12.  The results - FG, Punt, Punt, TD, FG.  13 Points.  Sure, there were some big plays in there, and every defense will surrender big plays now and then.  The key to playing defense, especially against a team like the Chiefs, is to force them to have to go the long way to score.  When the Broncos, as a team, did that, the Chiefs scored 1 TD in 5 possessions. 

How about the other 7 possessions that started accross the 40 yard line.  Incredibly, 6 of those drives started in Denver territory.  SIX TIMES the Chiefs began an offensive possession across the 50 yard line.  This is where the offense and special teams really let the defense down.

The first two possessions that started in Denver territory - (Den 26, Den 2), were on the fumbles by Eddie Royal and Brandon Marshall.  Both of these came in the first half and at the point the Chiefs took possession they were already in solid field goal range.  Both possessions led to points(FG, TD).

Now it is Cutler's turn, throwing the two interceptions, giving the Chiefs the ball inside Denver territory again(Den 43, Den 47).  With the Chiefs outside FG range, the defense hold strong, forcing a turnover and a punt, keeping the game clase(16-13), a very manageable situation for the offense.  Unfortunately, the offense did little to help the defense, going 3-and-out.  The Broncos offense had the ball 4 times in the 3rd quarter for a total of 6:28.  They ran a total of 16 plays, and crossed midfield only once, on the first drive of the 3rd quarter.  Still, the Broncos appeared to be in good shape.  The offense had turned the ball over 4 times and the defense had held the Chiefs to 16 points. 

Now it was the Special Team's turn.  After the Chiefs scored the only TD their offense earned all day, it became the coverage unit that let the defense down.  The Broncos answered the Chiefs TD with a FG -- Red Zone inefficiency - 1/4 on the day - is another way the offense hurt the defense, but that has been talked about all week -- the Broncos were looking to pin the Chiefs deep.  Someone make a play!  Nope.  The Chiefs are once again able to begin a possession in Denver territory when they break open the kick-off return.  The Chiefs need only 34 yards to answer the Broncos FG with 3 points of thier own. 

Again, the Broncos drive down and score, another field goal, and hope is renewed.  Again, the special teams miss out, this time on an onside kick.  Yes, odds are against the recovery of an onside kick, but Spencer Larsen was THAT close.  Someone make a play!

The Chiefs take over and score the game's final points, a Larry Johnson touchdown.  The possession needs to travel only 43 yards.

Do you see a trend?  The Broncos allowed 33 points.  Only 13 would be what I consider "earned points" by the Chiefs.  That's not to say that the Chiefs wouldn't have scored if the Broncos didn't continously give them the ball in Broncos' territory, but the odds were in the Broncos favor.

Football is the ultmate team game.  The idea of this post isn't to lay blame at the feet of the offense.  It is meant to remove full blame from the defense alone, and educate those of you not lucky enough to watch the game on what actually happened, beyond the boxscore.  The Broncos defense has alot of work to do.  But the offense we are so excited about needs to do it's part if the Broncos are to be successful and stop setting the defense up to fail.  That, my MHR brethern, is The Quest moving forward.

7 recs  |  Comment 23 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good job Guru

I think that if we improve field position and find a way to limit big plays, the defense will show much better results. It will give them a chance to get off the field more often.

The pass rush isn’t going to happen without a change in personnel, so we will have to live with that and allow the offense to compensate that one weakness by scoring more.

Go So Cal. I am the bigger one.

by amirebram on Sep 30, 2008 9:28 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

i thought this was more obvious than it must be

this game falls squarely on the shoulders of our passing offense, our savior the first 3 games. 4 turnovers shouldn’t need elaboration, and i agree the defense is getting too much blame here for this one. i thought they played great, in fact. st’s too, as well, except for the aforementioned late return. honestly, i’m not even too pissed off at this loss, because of the improvement by the defense/st’s-the key to our playoff hopes. defensively, the only thing i can say is the continued use of the 3-man rush is killing us, even though it was used much less often. that is probably attributed to the score, though, and this will be the single biggest problem with this team moving forward, i would say. 2 key 3rd-down conversions, when we needed a stop late in the game, was a direct result of this stupidity. on st’s, the return game looked much better, and prater more than redeemed himself for the miss, i think. k.c. did a good job stripping the ball, and the receivers need to be more aware of that, but what troubled me more was the 2 picks. cutler has been getting away with zeroing in on marshall and forcing passes into tight spots until now, but k.c. took advantage of this. i believe he threw into triple-coverage for both picks, and on the second one, they were breaking on the route as soon as it was released. scheff was wide-open for 6. the coaching can be partially blamed also, getting fancy on 3rd-and-1 and a few other occasions, and then we missed the field goal. RUN the damn ball on short-yardage/goal-line. this is my single biggest problem with the offensive play-calling, and it needs to be corrected, as well. if we can’t run for a yard or 2 for a first/touchdown, then we are going nowwhere. no confidence in the rb’s/o-line, there. we probably should have kicked an early field-goal to save time at the end, too, negating the need for an onside-kick. didn’t get that one, either. was larsen interfered with on that play, anyway? it appears he was shoved before he touched the ball, leading to his bobble and loss. whatever, we didn’t deserve to win this one, and i am out of my suicide pool now, darnit! guru is correct, we have alot of areas to work on, but the defense actually kept us in this one, in my opinion. bounce-back game coming on sunday, and i like our chances of doing just that, now that the other 2 units have at least shown up on the field

hear me, perpetrators of bread crime, your punishment is at hand.
taste my blintzkrieg!

by davecheffy on Sep 30, 2008 9:55 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I think after the emotional fits we all had and the disgust with losing to the Chefs,

we came to realize that the defense played a pretty solid game. I doubt any team that gives half the field to the opposing team on average will lose 9 out of 10 times…maybe even 99 out of 100 times. Our offense didn’t get it done and our defense played valiantly in spite of it.

Great post Guru.

If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08

by Tim Lynch on Sep 30, 2008 10:29 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

No doubt a total team loss, with

most the blame on the offense for four turnovers.

But the STs definitely hurt us again, just like against SD, and I think overall we were also out coached in this game. The biggest head scratcher is “Why did they not have Prater line drive that last KO out of the endzone?” Prater could kick it deep in the endzone anytime we want him too, as long as tell him to forget the hang time and just go for distance.

The Defense is getting a lot of negative attention because they have not had a really good game yet, and people are more worried about them than anything else.

But I personally was not totally surprised, cause young teams will have games like this occasionally. Better to losing “lesson” games against a non-contender.

by The Gun Young on Sep 30, 2008 10:32 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

a long day for the D

when the defense is on the field all day long it only makes for tired players and the odds of mistakes goes ever higher as they gasp for air.

by Shiiver on Sep 30, 2008 10:48 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Straight and to the point Guru.

I totally agree with 100%. It is true our defense didn’t look good against SD and NO, yet they did make some key stops. In KC, they did a lot better by holding KC to FGs and couldn’t as we have said before…..Make a play.

"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan

Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 4

by weazel on Sep 30, 2008 11:57 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

What puzzles me is

the Broncos had a kicker that was reported to be kicking the ball into the stratosphere in camp. Then, they get into the games, and he might kick a touchback, and he might not.

I’m not throwing the guy under the bus. He’s done a good job on FGs, and that’s fine. But this is not the first time something like this has seemed to have happened . . . a player can leap tall buildings with a single bound in camp, then we see Mr. Average in games. So we have Prater, a fine FG kicker so far, but Mr. Average in kickoffs.

What’s up with that?

Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy

by AZDynamics on Oct 1, 2008 2:28 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

altitude?

hear me, perpetrators of bread crime, your punishment is at hand.
taste my blintzkrieg!

by davecheffy on Oct 1, 2008 8:04 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Even at Mile High

Kaeding (SD) was kicking them deeper than Prater and Sproles was bold enough to run them out from the end zone as well.

Against NO, Prater kicked at least one through the uprights and the rest were deep enough that they weren’t run out.

It would certainly be a help if Prater were able to consistently hit them deep. Could it be that O’Brien is telling him NOT to kick it deep?

"It's all over Fat Man" - Tom Jackson to John Madden 1977 AFC Championship Game

"I love your analysis of our team. Its kinda like watching a spider monkey trying to figure out a jar of peanuts.. you know whats going on.. you know whats in there, but to actually figure it out, is just a bit beyond your mental skills..."
- Bronco Dano

by DesertBroncoFan on Oct 1, 2008 8:42 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Consider this

Prater is kicking the ball into the end zone, 3-4 yards deep, but the return guy is electing to bring it out. Are they told to do that because a) our special teams aren’t so hot or b) they know they have to score points to beat the Broncos?

If there's gonna be a collision, you better start it. Larry Csonka..

by bradley on Oct 1, 2008 3:17 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

definitely, a)

if they thought they wouldn’t at least get to the 20, there would be no reason to try it.

hear me, perpetrators of bread crime, your punishment is at hand.
taste my blintzkrieg!

by davecheffy on Oct 1, 2008 3:22 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whereas if he kicks the ball 5 yards into the EZ

it doesn’t come back out.

Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy

by AZDynamics on Oct 1, 2008 3:26 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

seriously?

“The Chiefs started offensive possessions inside their 30 yardline just 4 times out of 11 drives. The results of those drives — FG, Punt, Punt, TD. 10 Points Allowed. Acceptable”

the in four drives, the chiefs got 10 points. If you extrapulate that out to 11 drives, the Chiefs would have put up 27 points on the broncos anyway, and that’s assuming that ALL of the drives started out behind 30 yardline, which is a bit unrealistic. 27 points allowed to the chiefs is by no way acceptable. yeah, your offense certainly put you in a hole (you can’t turn the ball over that many times on the road), but 27 points isn’t acceptable.

by captain obvi-ass on Oct 1, 2008 10:55 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

You can't assume that....

The Chiefs long TD drive came in the 4th quarter, so there is nothing to indicate that the Chiefs wouldn’t have punted if they were forced to drive the field….I could just as easily say the Broncos allowed that 4th quarter TD becuase the defense was forced to be on the field most of the game…

-TSG

SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport

Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com

by John Bena on Oct 1, 2008 11:16 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

KC Points

Is 10 points acceptable in 4 drives? That is 3 or 7 points every other drive.

Guru’s point was as long as they started behind the 30 it was acceptable because they only scored 10 points. A score of every other drive is not acceptable, and I think its valid to extrapolate that the chief’s would have had a scoring opportunity every other drive if they started behind the 30.
But they wouldn’t have had 12 drives then, it would be like 8 or 9 long drives. Which would have meant 4 or 5 scoring opportunities (if they all started behind the 30 yard line). Which might have been the difference in this game.

I think it all comes down to how long your D stays on the field. The longer they play the worse they do.

Where are the Bronco’s forced fumbles and interceptions? One fumble recovery in four games. Come on Champ!

by ThatemW on Oct 1, 2008 2:49 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

you cant be serious !

name one single running back we stopped this year?
 name one QB, besides JOAKland QB, that did not have a 60 % () comp. field day against us.
 Let’s see our D stop Graham and dunn.
 Lets see them choke off the tampa WR and defy griese to throw the ball deep.
 lets see 2 sacks in a single game for our broncos!
 spare me the extrapolations, I want to see some quality tackling by our D before I start blaming the O for their season long incompetence !

Our broncos will be fortunate to win 6 games in the 2008 season;
this will be Shanahans last as the Broncos HC.

by chef zambini on Oct 5, 2008 3:21 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent post Guru. Rec'd and buzzed.

What ever happened to Niko and Winborn on ST’s? Jamie was great for us last year and Niko was a stud on ST for Seattle. I thought that even if Webster beat him out at MLB we would have an asset on ST. I have not been able to see the games, but I have seen no mention of two players I thought would be difference makers on ST.

That’s ok with me. We’re playing for wins, not media publicity....HT 9/11/08

by firstfan on Oct 1, 2008 12:29 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Guru.

I think I’ve been trying to say something that sounds like this about the defense all week. Only you do it so much better.

If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!

by Trinidad Jack on Oct 1, 2008 4:53 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Totally agree

Those were my thoughts after the game as well. Overall I think that all Bronco fans could see this loss coming. We have never been able to win in KC, and especially if we make that many stupid mistakes. But the defense saved us from a blow out. They continually were in their own territory and did a tremendous job of not giving up touchdowns. But it was just a recipe for disaster, giving the ball to LJ the most of the first quarter will kill any defense in the league. But there is a lot of room for improvement across the board, and this defense has the potential to be a lot better later in the season. With all of the changes in the last couple of years, it seems that the talent needs to gel. Slowicks is throwing a lot of wrinkles into the defense and they just need more game action to tweak them. Once these get worked out we will be one of the few defenses in the league that can shift in between a 4-3 and a 3-4. I am really excited about the flexibility and potential that this defense has. Lets just hope that time proves me right, and Super Bowl here we come.

by telliemrich on Oct 2, 2008 12:18 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

the blame game

all this analysis is very nice but…
 the lowly, and I do mean lowly cheifs had 13 posessions and only punted TWO times?
 I dont care what the O and ST did to help the cause, our D stinks, KC was not the first team to “run amuck’ on us, just the worst team to find hope against our pathetic defensive concepts !
 few teams come back from a 4 TO game, that is true, but our team has zero hope if our "O” does not make it happen.

Our broncos will be fortunate to win 6 games in the 2008 season;
this will be Shanahans last as the Broncos HC.

by chef zambini on Oct 5, 2008 3:12 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

on further review

…make that 3 punts in 13 posessions, we still suck at defense.

Our broncos will be fortunate to win 6 games in the 2008 season;
this will be Shanahans last as the Broncos HC.

by chef zambini on Oct 5, 2008 3:26 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

It's hard to force a punt...

When the opposition gains possession in Field Goal range!!!

3 Punts
1 possession right before half which we won’t count leaves 9 total possessions.
The Chiefs started 5 of those possessions IN BRONCOS TERRITORY!

-TSG

SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport

Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com

by John Bena on Oct 5, 2008 8:27 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!
Start posting about the Broncos »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The-big-lebowski_small
The Dude Abides...It's Charger Limerick Time...Again
Milehighstadium_small
Terror Alert in Chicago
Small
Understanding the NFL Running Game
Small
Understand the Passing Game in the NFL
Tahoetim_small
The Lynch Perspective - A Crossroads Edition

Recent FanPosts

Broncos-1024x768_small
The Art of "The Deep Ball"
Wall1_small
First Upset of the week!
Small
Should Orton Start If Healthy?
Walter_drawn_small
Momentum: The Potential for Potential
Small
How short the leash?
Tahoetim_small
Il Duca
Denver_small
Orton missies 3rd practice - game time decision
Nelson_broncos1_small
Broncos Tickets
Avs_and_broncos_small
Orton or Simms against San Diego?
Hpim2076_small
UPON FURTHER REVIEW - The Chargers Part 2

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Acme Packing Company
Friday Injury Report: 49ers at Packers
Acme Packing Company
Matthews: NFL Rookie of the Week
Gang Green Nation
Another Patriot Running his Mouth (surprise)-- Moss on Revis

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

MHR Radio

SPONSORS

Web Stuff


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

Cyborg_small Jeremy Bolander

Asst. Head Coach

Mhr_small Steve Nichols

Tahoetim_small Tim Lynch

J_elway_870111_640_small Douglas A. Lee

Plato_bust_small Emmett Smith

Denver-broncos-button_small Ted Bartlett

The-big-lebowski_small TJ Johnson

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk