Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2012 Africa Cup Of Nations Final

Seeking Your Thoughts -- Simon Fletcher vs. Andre Tippett

Now, I personally try to minimize the amount of time I spend obsessing over the Hall of Fame's indifference to the Broncos. But as a grown man who had to live in Boston for one painful year (fun details below) the following issue drives me to distraction:

Why is Andre Tippett in the Hall of Fame when Simon Fletcher hasn't got a sniff?

That's an honest question. There may be unmistakable reasons why Tippett was head-and-shoulders better. Their heydays in the NFL coincided with Junior High School for me, so I make no claims to possessing a holistic interpretation of their overall contributions as 3-4 linebackers. What I do have is stats. And the stats say that Tippett recorded 100 sacks in 12 seasons (8.33 per), while Fletcher notched 97.5 in 11 (8.86 per). We also know that Fletcher was an excellent tackler through the middle of his career (average better than 100 per year from 88-93), although his final 12 sacks over the '94 and '95 seasons came primarily in a specialist's pass-rushing role.

Can anybody out there who watched the game with an eye for detail in the late '80s and early '90s explain the difference between the two players? I'm not alleging a theory of media bias here. I just want to know what made Tippett such the clearly superior player.

OK, and while I'm at it, does anybody have stories to share about so-called Patriots fans? In the one year (2007-2008) I did time in Boston, I watched a lot of football games in bars. And I talked to lots of self-declared life-long Patriots fans. True exchanges from those conversations:

Chibronx: Now that I moved here, I've looked into Patriots history. I didn't know that Jim Plunkett was originally drafted by the Pats.

Die-Hard, Hardcore Pats Fan: Jim Plunkett?

Or:

Chibronx: So tell me, who all was on that '85 Pats team?

Hardcore Lives-and-Dies-by-the-Pats Fan: Um, Steve Grogan?

Chibronx: Right, and Craig James and Irving Friar and Andre Tippett. But somebody else must have had a really good year for them to make the Superbowl, right?

Rabid, Slobbering Pats Fan: I don't know.

And on and on....

Feel free to weigh in on either topic!

This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Andre Tippett is in the hof?

WTF is up with that?!? Did he retire as a Cowboy or 49er or Steeler or Raider or Dolphin?

This is my GAP, there are many like it but this one is mine. Without my GAP I am useless, without me, they will run through my GAP. I will protect my GAP and have my brothers back on his. I will not be moved from my GAP, I am a crazed dog that patrols this area and will defeat all who entire it. I own this GAP, it is mine. I bought it with blood and sweat. I will not be pushed. I will not be moved. This Sunday I will make a stand and a statement.

by Tim Lynch on Jan 28, 2009 2:40 PM MST reply actions  

Didnt you know

The Pats didnt exist until 2001. Well to most of the Pats fans. They probabaly didnt even know they use to be called the Boston Pats until 1970 or they are the only team to lose to the Chargers in a championship game (63 AFL title SD 51 Bos 10). Or that Stanley Morgan was a WR there before Wes Welker, Moss, Branch, et al. They are one of the most ill-informed fan bases ever. But until 2001 all Pat fans cared about was the Red Sox

somethings wrong, Trying to conquer these fears i thought were gone. And it's been so long, I'm dying to live in a world i don't belong

by broncfanstuckinsd on Jan 28, 2009 2:54 PM MST reply actions  

I wouldn't go that far

There are far more ill informed fans, I give you Raider, Cowboy, and Charger fans as good examples. I will admit that most New England fans are Red Sox fans first and foremost and then probably Celtic fans and then Pats fans, there are a good group of New England fans that are die hard Pats fans, but they are in the minority.

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman

by Broncoman on Jan 28, 2009 4:47 PM MST up reply actions  

Sure, they're well-informed about Brady and Welker and Vrabel and Bruschi....

….and Larry Bird and Kevin McHale and Kevin Youkilis and Dustin Pedroia and, OK, everyone on the Bruins…. I’m not being very subtle in my point here, but then again, these aren’t subtle people we’re dealing with.

by Chibronx on Jan 28, 2009 6:29 PM MST up reply actions  

I have ran into more

Pat fans than not that dont know squat about the history prior to 2001 of the Pats. This is not even close to an exaggeration. Its just like when Dallas won their 3 Bowls in 4 years I use to hear I was with them when they were 1-15. Pats fans for the most part are serious wagon riders. Look how many jumped off when Brady went down, then when they started winning they all of a sudden knew they Pats were gonna do good. But until I run into more than 3 that are actually knowledgeable I will change my mind, with where I work I am bombarded with people all over the country who have migrated for one reason or the other to SD, and I am unimpressed. 9 out of 10 couldnt even tell you who the coach was before Bellichick. (Hint: for you Pat fan that doesnt know he is at USC)

somethings wrong, Trying to conquer these fears i thought were gone. And it's been so long, I'm dying to live in a world i don't belong

by broncfanstuckinsd on Jan 28, 2009 7:00 PM MST up reply actions  

As Broncoman said, Boston fans are Sox and Celtics fans first, and rightfully so. Those two teams are ingrained in the city’s history, while the Pats are a much newer team, their real successes are more recent, and they don’t even play in Boston. So, as much as I cannot stand Ma$$holes and listening to them talk about their Sawks and Pats, I absolutely understand why they know more about the Sox and Celts than the Pats.

Consider Denver…I would have to think that those of you who live in there are Broncos fans to a much more intense level than you are Rockies or Avs fans. Obviously, there will be exceptions…but if the Avs aren’t doing so hot, don’t you think most folks in Denver will be paying closer attention to the Broncos? The Broncos are to Denver what the Celts and Sox are to Boston. I may be stretching things here a bit (I’m not sure), but see my point?

Here in NYC, I see a lot of Ma$$holes – worked with some, friends with some, and I even have friends who grew up elsewhere yet are somehow fans of all teams Boston. Obviously, as a native Long Islander it’s a bit strange that I root for the Broncos and not the Jets or Giants, but at least I’m a Mets/Islanders fan and not a fan of all teams Denver. But, I digress. I would say that from my experience, Pats fans are not very knowledgeable.

Couple weeks ago while watching the Giants/Eagles game I asked my buddy who’s a Pats fan what he thought of McDaniels going to Denver, and he asked, “Who?”. Another of the guys we watch football with every week is a Ma$$hole. I can remember back a few years when he asked “Who’s number 83? Is that Branch?” And the response, naturally, was “Why are you asking us?” Those sorts of things are pretty common…

by Douglas A. Lee on Jan 29, 2009 7:55 AM MST up reply actions  

In all fairness, also

Many Bronco fans are people who liked Elway and jumped on during the Elway years, I don’t fault them if the don’t know much about the Broncos pre-Elway or pre-Super Bowl wins. I can’t say that I know that much about the Broncos pre-1977 since I was 5 at the time. I know the history (Little and Tombstone Jackson and some of the others), but most of that has been derived from speaking with my dad and grandpa, but I can’t sit there and say Little was better than someone else in the same era because I don’t have another reference for it, I couldn’t tell you who the other top backs were in those times other than OJ Simpson.

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman

by Broncoman on Jan 29, 2009 11:24 AM MST up reply actions  

I have a friend who is from Boston and a Pats fan

Granted there is not the mass fanhood pre-2001, but there is a strong minority that have been die-hard fans. I think the big thing is that there obviously are more band wagon fans since 2001, but that is the same for any team, look at the Chargers, how many bandwagoners there are there, to me I see more Raider and Cowboy fans that are ignorant, go into most bars and most of the Raider fans are fans because of the black and silver makes them feel tough or as they are a rebel, they can’t name who their starters are other than McFaden or Russell, let alone tell you anything about any older players.

Me and my friend went to the Pats Broncos game in 2005 and we actually sat with about 8 other Pats fans in the south stands (like that would ever happen in old mile high), and they were all pretty knowledgable, a little rowdy, but they were definately more geeked about the Soxes winning the World Series, but that is understandable granted the history. But they knew their football and gave respect to the Broncos beating the Pats, and they were pretty knowledgable on the Broncos, even though most of them flew in from Boston.

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman

by Broncoman on Jan 29, 2009 11:12 AM MST up reply actions  

One would expect travelling fans to know there stuff....

….but I don’t think that makes them indicative of the fan base as a whole.

Sure, every team has its die-hards. And if I ever met a hardcore Pats fan, my respect would be through the roof. They were sustained by some awfully thin gruel for a long time.

Look, I understand if nobody wants to go there, but Ma$$holes sure do love them some Tedy Bruschi and Mike Vrabel and Wes Welker and Jason Varitek and Youk and McHale and Bird and my my what do all of those players have in common? As people out there like to put it (really): “I can relate to them. It’s like they’re normal people, not athletes.”

Forward-looking place, New England.

by Chibronx on Jan 30, 2009 8:15 AM MST up reply actions  

I wonder if part of the problem was...

that Simon played a few years as DE and apparently hof voters are pretty picky about positions, even arbitrarily re-assigning players to a new position as they see fit (see my FanPost, lol)… so they remove some of Simon’s sacks from his LB’ing total. Confused? Good… seems like the voters way of not getting Bronco players in.

But seriously, you bring up a good comparison. I can’t say I ever remember seeing Tippett play, but its more than a bit strange that Tippett is in the hof and has Simon ever even been a candidate???

You can see another issue here by going onto Wikipedia and doing a search on these two. Tippett’s is like 2 pages long, while Simon’s is around 2 sentences long. Simon was extremely under the radar; if you polled non-Bronco fans, you’d probably get many a “Simon Who?” response. Simon quietly went about his business and collected 12-15 sacks a year… meanwhile never getting any of the accolades he arguably deserved (no Pro Bowl births).

We’ll probably be having this same conversation in 5 years, when Rod Smith is snubbed for the hof.

by tunga77 on Jan 28, 2009 4:00 PM MST reply actions  

I think part of the problem is that Fletcher never went to the pro-bowl

And I think you are also correct in that Fletcher I think was seen as more of a DE than LB, and he never was what I would call a dominant guy, just a very good player and very consistent, he just never had that dominant year to have the rest of the league and media notice him. Plus he wasn’t a loud mouth or jerk so that won’t get you noticed. I didn’t think Tippett belonged in the HOF (especially when guys like Gradishar, Jackson, and Mecklenberg) are not in it. The only thing you can say about Tippett is that he played with less talent around him than Fletcher did.

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman

by Broncoman on Jan 28, 2009 4:51 PM MST up reply actions  

That's the question: What separates HoF from not even worthy of consideration?

I’m receptive to all of the arguments made here. Tippett was seen as a pure outside rush LB, where Fletcher was a tweener. The Broncs were the team of Orange Crush fame (wow, is that a distant memory) and the Pats were on nobody’s radar in particular.

I’m receptive to the idea that the HoF is more for players with a few extraordinary years than for being consistently very good. Tippett had back-to-back years in which he rolled up 18.5 and 16.5 sacks (wow), where Fletcher’s best back-to-back years were 13.5 and 16. Don’t even get me started on the consistent Pro Bowl snubs of one of the league’s top sack men. It’s not evern ire-raising. It’s just….. weird.

But still, there must be something else that places one guy in the Hall and doesn’t even get the other a ticket to the discussion.

by Chibronx on Jan 28, 2009 6:27 PM MST up reply actions  

tippett was good

but not hof worthy, in my opinion. fletcher had a comparable career, and isn’t hof material either, just an excellent play-maker. karl mecklenburg, again, is the most underrated player in the history of sports, period. unfortunately, having no defense in multiple super bowl losses really hurt his case. 1 win, and he’s probably in. same with the rest of the old broncos. unfair, yes, but elway got all of the credit for the sb runs, unfortunately. tippett, i honestly don’t know the politics behind his selection, but there are 10 broncos more deserving than he. sad

taste my blintzkrieg!
2009-year of the defense.

by davecheffy on Jan 28, 2009 6:17 PM MST reply actions  

In defence of Tippett

Thought I’d start my first ever post with a bit of hopefully good natured disagreement with you good fellows on the other side of the pond!

I don’t care so much for pro bowl selections as they tend to be too populist, but there are a lot of other things you could look at when comparing players.

All-pro picks say a lot to me. Tippet was All-pro LB twice, he was also AFC defensive player of the year once, he ranked seventh on the all-time sacks list, and third among linebackers, at the time of his retirement. He is still 4th.

I loved Fletcher – hey I grew up watching the Broncos during his time at DE – but Fletcher was never a dominant DE like Tippett was a dominant pass rush LB of his era.

To be in HoF in my opinion you need to be the best of your era and of course LT was the man for that in the 80’s. But Tippett was not far behind.

With the offensive bias the HOF committee show towards offensive skill positions + offensive numbers (Warren Moon anyone? ugh!) , I’m just grateful to see any linebacker in there at all!

The exclusions of Mecklenburg and Grandishar are far more galling then Fletcher.

by British Bronco on Jan 29, 2009 4:40 AM MST reply actions  

I agree

Especially Gradishar. When I heard last year that Tippett and Dean got in and Randy didn’t, I couldn’t believe it. That was a great weekend because Zim and Monk got in and the Pats lost, but it would have been perfect if Randy would have gotten an honor that he should have received by 1993.

by PABroncofan on Jan 29, 2009 5:40 AM MST reply actions  

Simon should get consideration

based solely on that awesome handle bar mustache of his. ;)

by tunga77 on Jan 29, 2009 9:11 AM MST reply actions  

It's simply a bias....let me esplain Lucy

As a franchise that has been as succesful as Denver has, what other reason could there be? Since the merger in 1970, Denvers winning percentage is among the top 5 in the NFL, and that is still with poor seasons in the early 70’s. I believe it all starts with the AFL. The MSM regarded the AFL as the lesser, weaker Pro Football League. Certainly they couldn’t match up with the NFL. Then when the Jets won SBIII, the country was crazy about the AFL. Question asked: “If the Jets could beat the Colts, who else can win a SB from the AFL?” Answer: “Ahh Duh, mabey the Chiefs or Oakland, or the Bills, those are the only other AFL teams right?”
Reason being, the teams that never did squat in the AFL were considered insignificant and without merit; Which brings up the Denver Broncos. It’s interesting that the Broncos were the first AFL team to beat an NFL team, but they were also the second to do it a week later. Of course as some have said here before, “Denver was just a Cow Town, hell, it probably didn’t even have a Post Office back then.” (I grew up here and the only cows I remember seeing in town were at the Stock Show in January or the meat department at the supermarket)

My point is that the Broncos were never any good in the AFL, so they were never considered as contenders. Not until 1977 when they made their first Playoff appearance and Super Bowl. I believe that perception stayed with many people and still does. But like everything else with the “No Respect” monikers, Denver fans didn’t care. We supported this team inside and out. We knew they sucked, but they were our team and we lived with it, and learned to like it or else deal with it, and if you didn’t like it, then you could ride your cow out of town (providing you could find one).

The original question of Fletcher vs Tippett, is classic of what I just stated. Nobody respected Denver, thus Fletcher never got the pro Bowl nod. Without Pro Bowls and All Star Teams, a player has zero shot at the HOF, which is essentially the same chance as a former Bronco has. Fletcher never once got voted to a pro bowl in 11 years. Whats up with that. He will never even be a finalist.

And another thing while I’m ranting, It irks me when people think the Broncos became popular when Elway got here. The hell it did. Broncomania was alive, well, and kickin long before Elway showed up. He started a new chapter in the franchise, but this town was nuts long before. The Broncos have sold out every game since 1970, and was pretty packed for a lot of games in the 60’s. Elway was 10 years old in 1970, so don’t believe he is everything that the Broncos ever were. Far from it.

I’m going to do a seperate post on the history of the Broncos Pass Rushers, please check it out.

"If Denver beats us, I'll walk back to Detroit" - Alex Karras

by Denver Diehard on Jan 29, 2009 8:05 PM MST reply actions  

I talked to John Tarver

who was a Pat’s RB after graduating from CU. He said that Plunkett threw a nice soft pass that you could reach up and grab out of the air.
The day before the Pats met Chicago in the superbowl after the ’85 season, Tony Eason (from Illinois – the great ’83 class) their starting QB was talking about how great the Bears were. I knew right then what the outcome of the game would be. The Pats did better when Grogan came in – but they were behind by what – 20-30 pts by then?
Simon Fletcher: what a great player to watch! He played hard, tough and smart.

by Blackknigh on Jan 29, 2009 11:56 PM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Zozobra_small
Explaining What "IT" Is that Tebow Has: An Analysis of the Art of Miracles
Pumpkin_small
The risk/reward analysis on drafting RBs earlier vs later
Images-2_small
Calling out IAOFM
Fabio_elway_grade_small
What the Broncos have already made this offseason
Me_as_a_simpson_small
The State of the Roster (Offense)

Recent FanPosts

Small
Mock Offseason 2.0
Images_small
outsider look on some potential Denver FA targets
Ph_small
2011: MHR I Need Your Help With An Upcoming Post
La_la_land_small
1st Round Mock-Don't Read It If You Don't Like Mocks
Small
Needs based FA and Draft by position
Small
It Might Be Time to go Poaching
Work___family_062_small
I Hate This!
Work___family_062_small
The Question Of Leadership!
Work___family_062_small
Vanity, Vanity! All, is Vanity!
Small
Only my opinion

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

Dadndaughter_small Tim Lynch

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Position Coach

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Flag_canada_small Colby

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Small zsheely

2011-12-10_23 IanHenson

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk