BFTB Answers Your Chargers Questions
Hey kids. If you don't know me already, I'm John Bena's doppleganger and the Managing Editor at Bolts From The Blue, SB Nation's blog community for San Diego Chargers fans.
Big game coming up in six days, for both the Chargers and the Broncos. Although you guys probably know more about the Chargers than most of our opponents, I'd still like to offer my services as a expert on all thing Chargers to answer any questions you have.
As far as my position in this year's Chargers/Broncos rivalry, I'm probably more realistic than most of the Bolts fans you're used to. I think the Broncos are playing at a higher level than the Chargers right now. I think the Chargers have the potential to be the better team at the end of the year, but a lot of things need to happen to get there (Merriman needs to get healthy, English needs to get better, Cason needs to start, etc.). I'm genuinely worried about Monday's game, but I'm slightly comforted by these 3 things:
- It's a home game
- The Chargers have had 14 days to gameplan
- The Chargers play best when they're desperate (second half of games, second half of the season)
I think the Broncos are playing a little above their heads because of the momentum gained in victories against lesser teams, and I don't know that they can prove themselves to be "elite" until they hang with the Colts, Giants, Eagles, Ravens, Steelers, etc. If they lose to them, how they come back from that loss will show if they're legitimate SB contenders this year. However, the fact that they're even on the cusp of that right now (and above where I'd rank the Chargers) shows that McDaniels isn't the knucklehead he seemed to be in the offseason.
Alright, I'll stop rambling now. Post your questions in the comments and I'll come back periodically do answer them. Please "Rec" this FanPost so that it stays near the top of the page up-to and throughout the game. Also, please keep the trash-talking to a minimum. This FanPost is to be used as an exchange of knowledge. You have a question, I have an answer. Making fun our of coach is not an exchange of knowledge and is not helpful at all.
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
24 recs |
333 comments
Comments
Oh Man...
I was reading your post , and getting all ready to type, and then you had to go and throw in that last sentence…Sigh…
by BroncoSense72 on Oct 13, 2009 5:09 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
No Norv! Denied!!! :(
"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV
by sadaraine on Oct 13, 2009 9:45 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I took a shot anyway
but only in an attempt at humor.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 9:54 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chris Chambers
Do you feel that Chris Chambers has provided value for a 2nd round pick? I don’t get to see what he does outside of the stats and I would like to have your observations on his route running, blocking etc
by CockneyBronco on Oct 13, 2009 5:36 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Meh
You have to realize how badly he was needed when the Chargers traded for him. They had no WRs at all. Vincent Jackson wasn’t polished enough, Buster Davis was a bust, etc. etc. On that 2007 team, the leading WR was Vincent Jackson with 41 catches. 41!!! So yes, Chambers was worth the 2nd round pick in 2007 and has been a very good teacher for VJ, Naanee and the rest of the Chargers young WRs.
He’s still a very good route-runner and an average blocker. Chris’ issue is that he cannot catch the freaking ball. He usually catches about 50% of the balls that are thrown at him. Part of that is him taking his eyes off the ball, part of it is that he doesn’t play strong and gets the ball knocked out if he’s hit during the catch, and part is that his hands are just not very good.
So, he was worth the 2nd rounder in 2007. However, in the two seasons since he’s just taking a spot away from one of the better, younger WRs and collecting a HUGE paycheck. I can’t wait for his contract to run out at the end of this season. There’s zero percent chance he comes back for 2010.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 6:09 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't say this is making fun of your coach
But rather constructive criticism/ honest question put forth to a chargers fan….
Do you think Norv Turner is what has been holding you guys back as a team? I’ve been one of the people on the outside looking in thinking “Man o man, the Chargers are one Norv Turner away from the playoffs.”
As an “insider” so to speak, what is your take on this?
by BroncoFanInLakewood on Oct 13, 2009 5:36 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
First off....
“one Norv Turner away from the playoffs”?? They’ve made the playoffs, and won at least one playoff game, in each season that Norv has been the coach.
I’ve always been one to point the blame elsewhere. Injuries, bad luck, Ted Cottrell, etc. However, as the team repeatedly comes out flat in the first half of games I’m finding it harder to blame anyone but Norv.
The Chargers have made it well known that if they do not make the playoffs this season, Norv is gone. I think that’s about right. If they can make the playoffs, he deserves to keep the job (which I do believe he’s been getting better at as he goes along). If they don’t, he deserves to becoming the mockery of the league.
Make no mistake though, without a healthy Merriman this team doesn’t have a very good roster. So it’s not entirely on Norv. He’s just a part of it.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 6:12 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
its bad luck
in madden sd kick my ass
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
by j-man on Oct 13, 2009 2:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
How is the health of LDT?
Also, if you could give us a rundown on the overall health of the team? I’m sure the 2 weeks helped heal some guys.
All you get from drafting the "best player available" is a team full of good football players.
Cotton McKnight: I'm being told that Average Joe's does not have enough players and will be forfeiting the championship match.
Pepper Brooks: It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em.
by orangeblood on Oct 13, 2009 5:44 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Ugh
We got a report yesterday that 5 of the “front seven” of our defense sat out practice yesterday (3 LBs, 2 DL). Considering we can’t stop any RB right now, that’s not a good sign. The offense is healthy, outside of Nick Hardwick.
Tomlinson is very healthy. I think he was very healthy against Pittsburgh, but by time the Chargers got the ball they were down big and he hardly had a chance to touch the football.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 6:15 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for coming by!
I always like to ask the following. I appreciate any time you can give to these questions….
1) What is the strength of the SD offense right now, and the strength of the defense?
2) What is the weakness of the offense? The defense?
3) What player(s) should Denver fans know about that we might not know about yet?
4) What aspect of the Denver offense and defense do you think the Chargers respect the most? What area of Denver’s team do you think SD can exploit?
I always believe a fan/blogger can give more accurate answers to these questions than what one can get from a journalist, and a guest like you coming over from another SBN site is always like pure gold.
Thanks again so much for your time, and best of luck!
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 13, 2009 6:25 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
1) What is the strength of the SD offense right now, and the strength of the defense?
Philip Rivers and the passing game (especially downfield) is probably the only strength for the Chargers offense right now. The line hasn’t been great, the running game has been abysmal and even the short passing game is erratic.
Defenses have caught on though. Miami played Cover 2 and Cover 3 all game, but Rivers threw pinpoint balls downfield to Vincent Jackson (who is completely uncoverable by CBs under 6’) and beat them. The Steelers played the same defense, and then dominated the game with their offense to give Rivers less chances.
I don’t know that the defense has a strength right now. The secondary has gone through spurts of legitimacy, but besides that they’ve been terrible. There’s an outside chance that Cromartie will be demoted to Nickel Corner before Monday’s game. No other facet of the defense is worth any praise.
2) What is the weakness of the offense? The defense?
The weakness of the offense is the running game. The offensive line has been banged up, and the Chargers are usually trailing, so the ground game hasn’t had much of a chance to do anything. Statistically, they’re last in the league in terms of running. If LT is healthy and the Chargers are in the game, they can be decent, but with Sproles starting they’ve been hampered in that way as well.
The weakness of the defense is the complete and total lack of pass-rush. Merriman’s knee is still not 100% and now he’s battling a bad groin. Larry English has been……okay at best. Behind in the game (and unable to stop the run), Ron Rivera has been terrified to call blitzes. It’s led to the same thing Chargers saw last year, which is opposing QBs sitting back in the pocket for 5-10 seconds waiting for somebody to get open before throwing.
3) What player(s) should Denver fans know about that we might not know about yet?
A tough question since Denver fans see the Chargers twice each year. I’d go with Legedu Naanee. Legedu, along with Malcom Floyd, has been taking away snaps from Chris Chambers. Naanee is fast, quick, strong and seems to have super glue on his hands. He’s been getting more time on the field in 2009 and ,outside of a boneheaded run-after-catch that may have cost the Chargers the Ravens game, he’s been fantastic.
4) What aspect of the Denver offense and defense do you think the Chargers respect the most? What area of Denver’s team do you think SD can exploit?
I won’t go with what aspect they respect most, I’ll go with what they fear the most. They have to be afraid of the Denver running game. Since Jamal Williams was placed on IR, they haven’t been able to stop anybody on the ground. In the same regard, they haven’t been able to cover anybody and have been afraid to blitz.
If the Chargers are going to win this game, they’re going to have to stop the run with their defensive line and they’re going to have to blitz the hell out of Kyle Orton. The gameplan against the Broncos has to be the same gameplan the Chargers usually have going against the Colts, which is “They don’t have any glaring weaknesses, so let’s blitz, blitz, blitz and hope that throws the QB off.”
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 6:54 AM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
Great stuff John!
I appreciate the time!
Here’s to your guys getting healthy and doing well against all but Denver.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 13, 2009 7:17 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
You state that many of these issues depend on health
Could you elaborate a little on the health of the players. I saw where you stated above that LT is very healthy.
By nearly all accounts and nearly all eyes, Sproles is a great change of pace ‘back, but certainly not an every down back. So do you expect a healthy LT to turn SD’s running game quickly around, or do you feel that the loss of WIlliams has yet to be overcome? Also, aside from him and Merriman, who are the other injuries you’re concerned with?
by elvisalex on Oct 13, 2009 9:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The loss of Jamal has not, and probably will not, be overcome. The fact that the defense can’t seem to stop anybody makes LT’s health irrelevant really. Whether or not he can get the running game going (it would certainly be a boost) matters only if the Chargers can keep the game close.
Travis Johnson was traded for to help with defensive line depth and they’re pegging him to be the starter at NT. One problem: he can’t get on the field. Texans fans warned us that they guy is never healthy and he’s been living up to that reputation. Here’s the list of defensive starters that did not practice yesterday:
-Shawne Merriman
-Shaun Phillips
-Stephen Cooper
-Jacques Cesaire
-Travis Johnson
Any of those guys not playing on Monday is a big deal, but the only one I expect might miss that game would be Johnson.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 10:45 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll second HT
Thanks for that fantastic summary. I’ve actually liked SD for years, having so many family members in the Del Mar / San Diego area. It’s just the last few years, when you’ve been so strong late in the seasons and clearly found and exploited Shanahan’s schematic weaknesses that I haven’t been able to stomach the Bolts. (I’m sure you can understand why! lol) But again, that’s just because you guys have been so consistent and formidable against us lately. Hopefully, we’ll be able to respond this time as we couldn’t for the last few years.
Hard to imagine I’d ever feel this way, but right now this is a more meaningful rivalry than Broncos-Raiders by a large stretch. That’s a credit to your team and your fans for giving it their all. Here’s hoping we just have a well played, competitive game on Monday — I’m so over the blow outs. O.o
This said, here’s are my follow-up questions related to HT’s above (which is why i’m posting here and hopefully you’ll see it lol)
1. I’m familiar with how you guys felt about Jay Cutler. As a division rival, what is your take on our new HC and how he handled the offseason controversy?
2. Now that we have let Shanahan go and adopted the NE philosophy of situational football, how do you think the Chargers will adjust? How do you feel you match up against NE’s offense over the last few years when both teams were relatively healthy and feeling good?
3. How did your offseason go this year?
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Oct 13, 2009 9:47 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
1. I’m familiar with how you guys felt about Jay Cutler. As a division rival, what is your take on our new HC and how he handled the offseason controversy?
I still think he handled the offseason like an asshole. That being said, my take on McDaniels is that his schemes are so strong that he’ll always field a good team and the players will always buy into his BS (kindof like Belichick). Winning heals all wounds.
2. Now that we have let Shanahan go and adopted the NE philosophy of situational football, how do you think the Chargers will adjust? How do you feel you match up against NE’s offense over the last few years when both teams were relatively healthy and feeling good?
You’re going to have to explain “situational football” to me. Although they’ve had more success against the Colts than they have against the Patriots, both of these teams have always been excellent matchups for the Chargers for the past few years. I’m not exactly certain why, except that Peyton doesn’t do well against 3-4 defenses. We were always able to create a pass-rush and Jamal Williams usually had huge games stopping the run.
3. How did your offseason go this year?
I could look back now and say the Chargers had a terrible draft, but who knows right now? Larry English is still developing as a pass-rusher, we still don’t have a young RB and the project pick (Vaughn Martin) isn’t ready to be getting significant time right now.
I was optimistic about the offseason because Kevin Burnett was a great FA signing, Ron Rivera was supposedly turning into a blitzing madman with his defensive playbook and everyone was finally healthy. After four games, half the team is hurt and Ron Rivera seems to think it’s still the preseason. So right now it’s not looking like it was a good offseason, but we’ll see as the season goes on and the rookies get better.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 10:52 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
???
the players will always buy into his BS
By BS, I’m assuming you mean the stuff that wins Super Bowls “(kindof like Belichik)”. Maybe your team could use a little BS, dontcha think?
Richard Seymour is a girl.
by pubkeeper on Oct 13, 2009 10:56 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
First
don’t be a jackass.
Second, every coach has BS. Since that term offends you, let’s call it “baggage”. Belichick is insanely hard on his players, but they buy into it because he’s a winner with good schemes. Same thing with Coughlin and, at one point, Parcells. That whole coaching tree seems based off “Shut up, get in line and I’ll lead us to victory.” Which is cool, but when you’re not winning (i.e. Mangini, Crennel) it gets old with the players really fast.
What I was saying is that McDaniels appears to have a bit of an ego, and seems to be a little different from your standard NFL coach. However, as long as he’s running out one of the best offenses in the league and drawing in coaches like Nolan to handle the defense, the players will deal with it. That’s what I meant.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:22 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Hey
I appreciate you coming in here and answering questions and I don’t expect you to have a rosey view of the Broncos’ HC, but you lay down the law:
Making fun our of coach is not an exchange of knowledge and is not helpful at all.
then answer a question about him in the context of the Jay Cutler situation with something as thoughtful as:
I still think he handled the offseason like an asshole.
and I’m the jackass.
OK.
Richard Seymour is a girl.
by pubkeeper on Oct 13, 2009 11:54 AM MDT up reply actions 4 recs
+1
You have to forgive John for this. He deals with a lot of kids in his forum so he might have a memory lapse when he comes here.
Words can fool men but Nature doesn't give a damn!
by MadDogExtra on Oct 13, 2009 12:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it’s funny that his response to my response was to go back 3 comments.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 1:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah
Just went to your opening post is all. You set the “rule” then break it yourself a little later, then call me a jackass for my sarcastic response to it.
Richard Seymour is a girl.
by pubkeeper on Oct 13, 2009 1:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was asked my opinion of how McDaniels handled the offseason. I suppose I should’ve said “no comment”.
Tell you what, if I ask you for your opinion of Norv Turner and you call him a buffoon then I’ll have nothing to complain about.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 3:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps you can give a comment without name calling.
I like your rule, and I think it is fair to answer a question if it gets asked. But don’t ask people not to trash your HC, then use the term “jack ass” to refer to ours. You could have answered the question without the name calling.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 14, 2009 6:44 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You need to do more reading
I didn’t call McDaniels a jackass. I didn’t even call him an asshole. I said that I felt like he acted like an asshole in the offseason (specifically in dealing with Cutler).
I then called pubkeeper a jackass, and I owe him an apology for that. I probably should’ve called him “smartass” instead, which would still deserve an apology.
I’m sorry pubkeeper, my team’s poor performance this season has made me fiesty.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 6:47 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Splitting hairs.
Saying a person is like “X” versus saying a person “is X” is the same ad hominem.
If someone were to say Turner coaches like a “X” then the clear inference is that Coach Turner IS an “X”. I would feel your coach is being maligned unfairly. (You’ll note that I was at your site, and saw one of our own guests at your site acting badly and called him on it. I’m calling it down the middle).
It wouldn’t be such an issue if you hadn’t asked people not to attack your coach, then turned around and attacked our coach, then tried to justify it.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 14, 2009 7:09 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I thought McD was an a-hole I would’ve said it. I don’t. I just think he acted like one in his odd fight against Cutler. I would never have said anything if I wasn’t asked my opinion on McD’s offseason, which is the biggest difference.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 8:02 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm on John's side on this one.
We asked what the perception was. That’s a fair assessment of what the outside world thought. I have no idea why this turned into such a big deal.
by legendarywalton on Oct 14, 2009 9:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
BTW
I like your avatar. Is that an official team logo? I don’t think I’ve seen that before.
Richard Seymour is a girl.
by pubkeeper on Oct 13, 2009 12:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It used to be
It was their AFL logo from the 60s, before they started hiding the fact that they were named after horses.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 1:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
??
I thought they were named the Chargers because of the big battery industry in San Diego?
IT is, and it is impossible for IT not to be.
Parmenides (5th Century B. C. Greek)
by bradley on Oct 13, 2009 1:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
They were named the chargers because the original AFL owner,
Barron Hilton, was president of the Carte Blanche credit card company. At least according to the AFL history show that has been on Showtime.
by jayrocksd on Oct 13, 2009 2:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Barron Hilton picked the Chargers name when he purchased an AFL franchise for Los Angeles. "I liked it because they were yelling ‘charge’ and sounding the bugle at Dodgers Stadium and at USC games."
by Endzone on Oct 13, 2009 2:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hilton later said this in a PR move
but the name chargers was origionally used because of the credit card company like jayrocksd said this is according to the Full Color Football documentary aired on Showtime
by ThunderBringer on Oct 13, 2009 9:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Charge Cards
Are the devil incarnate. I have known literally hundreds of people whose lives have been ruined by easy credit charge cards. Makes me hate the Dolts even more.
by Endzone on Oct 13, 2009 9:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Chargers = Ruining peoples’ lives with credit cards?
Barron Hilton hasn’t been the owner for quite some time.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 3:33 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought the Chargers were named after warhorses.
charger1
n
1. a person or thing that charges
2. (Military) a large strong horse formerly ridden into battle
3. (Electronics) a device for charging or recharging an accumulator or rechargeable battery
Hence the warhorse on their classic logo. Whatever, I still love their uniforms. Both the powder blues and the ones they’re wearing lately.
Man is not a rational animal, he is a rationalizing animal.
by MrFNSunshine on Oct 14, 2009 8:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So wait......
We can’t make fun of your coach but you can call ours all kinds of names?
I was really interested in all the analysis you had written up until I read that. Shame you let that fly.
Baggage or your other term isn’t offensive its your calling him an A hole.
I would hope you would support who we are. Not, who we are not. Coach Norman Dale "Hoosiers"
by dmitchell624 on Oct 13, 2009 3:35 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Referring to Mcdaniels' methods as BS
is also rather offensive. I’m curious as to how much time you’ve spent in the locker room of an elite football organization in order to make an educated comment on that sort of thing anyhow…
by ThunderBringer on Oct 13, 2009 9:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh hell
1. I was asked my opinion on how McDaniels and how he handled the offseason. I didn’t call him an asshole, I said he handled the offseason like one. And he did. He caused all sorts of problems with Cutler when it would’ve been solved with an easy phone call.
2. I didn’t refer to his methods as BS. I’ll quote myself….
Second, every coach has BS. Since that term offends you, let’s call it "baggage". Belichick is insanely hard on his players, but they buy into it because he’s a winner with good schemes. Same thing with Coughlin and, at one point, Parcells. That whole coaching tree seems based off "Shut up, get in line and I’ll lead us to victory." Which is cool, but when you’re not winning (i.e. Mangini, Crennel) it gets old with the players really fast.
What I was saying is that McDaniels appears to have a bit of an ego, and seems to be a little different from your standard NFL coach. However, as long as he’s running out one of the best offenses in the league and drawing in coaches like Nolan to handle the defense, the players will deal with it. That’s what I meant.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 3:36 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice explanation
We admire you for taking the time to respond even to the inevitable backlash. In any 1000 words a few of them are bound to piss somebody off.
That said, my condolences on the hint of jealosy with regard to head coaches that I may detect creeping into your tone….
If I weren’t a Broncos fan, I’d be jealous as hell. Who goes from 8-8 and putrid on one side of the ball to 6-0 (oops ;) ) and dominant on that same side, in one stinking draft?
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Oct 14, 2009 7:25 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would've been solved with a phone call
and Cutler didn’t make one. With that said I was ready to see Cutler go before we traded him You don’t call the owner you will be in the doghouse.
2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
by weazel on Oct 14, 2009 10:09 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
JC wouldn't answer McD & Bowlen's phone calls
Then he denied that Bowlen tried to call him, essentially calling his boss a liar. You don’t not anwer your boss’ phone calls and then call him a liar w/out consequences.
Besides, Bowlen pulled the trigger on the trade, not McD. And from how the season’s played out so far, it looked like a great move by the Broncos Front Office.
People can use statistics to prove anything, 87% of all people know that.
by c_style on Oct 14, 2009 3:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know that
I was responding to John who seems to put all the blame on McD.
2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
by weazel on Oct 14, 2009 5:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My bad
I meant to reply to John.
People can use statistics to prove anything, 87% of all people know that.
by c_style on Oct 14, 2009 7:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, OK. It's all good then.
2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
by weazel on Oct 14, 2009 7:51 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously buddy, are you friggin nuts?
1. I was asked my opinion on how McDaniels and how he handled the offseason. I didn’t call him an asshole, I said he handled the offseason like one. And he did. He caused all sorts of problems with Cutler when it would’ve been solved with an easy phone call.I apologize I wasn’t aware that you had access to telephone transcripts of guys like this. How bout’ that freedom of information act!
I can’t address point number 2. The fact that you tastelessly swallowed your pride and partially quoted your origional statement in an attempt to decieve shows that you are clearly backpedaling from some BS you said before and inadvertantly arguing with yourself. I’ll let you handle that one although I think you may win…..or lose. Do you play 8-ball by yourself often?
by ThunderBringer on Oct 15, 2009 9:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, I'm not too savvy with quote blocks
This should be the finished product:
Seriously buddy, are you friggin nuts?
1. I was asked my opinion on how McDaniels and how he handled the offseason. I didn’t call him an asshole, I said he handled the offseason like one. And he did. He caused all sorts of problems with Cutler when it would’ve been solved with an easy phone call.
I apologize I wasn’t aware that you had access to telephone transcripts of guys like this. How bout’ that freedom of information act!
I can’t address point number 2. The fact that you tastelessly swallowed your pride and partially quoted your origional statement in an attempt to decieve shows that you are clearly backpedaling from some BS you said before and inadvertantly arguing with yourself. I’ll let you handle that one although I think you may win…..or lose. Do you play 8-ball by yourself often?
by ThunderBringer on Oct 15, 2009 9:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
DAMNIT!
I guess this wont fare well for my argument…
by ThunderBringer on Oct 15, 2009 9:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why Even Argue
Can’t you just pretend it might be just an opinion of John’s and move on? Like people haven’t said things so horrible about McD before. Not to mention, wasn’t this all like 5 days ago? He’s apologized several times. Just let obviousman off the hook for F@&#$ sake!!! Wasn’t the point of this thread to promote cross site questions, not to showcase Denver douchebags?
by RaRaDonk89 on Oct 15, 2009 9:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think there's a fine line
between an opinion and the outlandish statements that come out of this guys mouth SOMETIMES. But we’ll just call it a harmless opinion for the sake of argument.
You’re right, I didn’t realize that John apologized a few days ago so I retract my hostility towards him. I was only defending myself from his reply to comments I made.
In any event RaRa, you’re correct. The point of this thread is to promote friendly cross site questions. But I won’t just sit here, while some fan from a rival team comes around badmouthing my team with no logical evidence. If that makes me a douchebag, than fill me full of vinegar, water and funk.
by ThunderBringer on Oct 15, 2009 9:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, it's fine
Just a big thread and I got tired of coming back to check new comments that were just more people yelling at John. I agree that what he said was a bit inflammatory, but he was asked to be a bit of a national opinion barometer. I mainly felt that either 1) he didn’t mean anything, don’t sweat it, or 2) he was bashing McD, I’ve heard worse. No problem with anything you said, just felt like the issue should have been dropped after an hour at the most. Mainly just a little disappointed in MHR posters’ ability to stay focused in this particular case.
by RaRaDonk89 on Oct 15, 2009 10:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks John
I’d expect nothing less than straight answers from the Bolts’ head blogger and you certainly didn’t let me down. I liked the Larry English pick — time will tell, but I think he has a lot of promise. But I’m sure glad we took KnowMo so you guys couldn’t have a chance at him. : )
Anyway, good luck this season. Except for Monday. ; )
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Oct 13, 2009 4:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and for the record
I thought the Broncos throwbacks were awesome.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 7:03 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
That's very kind of you.
I don’t think any of us did. lol
: )
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 13, 2009 7:12 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
ACtually HT...I LOVED them......but I am into ugly.....dont know how I got so lucky to have a great looking wife and kids...but go figure..
Guess the sun shines a dogs arse once in a while!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Oct 13, 2009 7:57 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
some "ugly" must be appreciated and thus it becomes beauty...
I’m so down with the throwbacks…kinda grimey, yet impactful…plus we won so they took on a that association. That bein said, I also loved the patriot throwbacks.
you already know.
by justwhytee on Oct 13, 2009 4:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah for sure...but they are so weird they are cool!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Oct 13, 2009 8:23 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
plus one and rec’d – that sums it up for me.
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Oct 13, 2009 9:54 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very true.
After seeing them several times, I actually didn’t mind the yellow jerseys. However let’s stick to orange and blue. Those for a couple of games is fine.
2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
by weazel on Oct 14, 2009 10:12 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
I think the unis were cool other than the socks. The rest of the unis were cool in their uniqueness and simplicity. The socks were just wtf.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 9:53 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only thing I'd change
is the helmet. I’d take the numbers off and put the Bucking Bronco dude logo on them. Now that’d be cool.
by bchiper on Oct 13, 2009 10:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would be man...SUPER COOL...wish i could get a hoodie with the Bucking Bronco dude!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Oct 13, 2009 12:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can!
I saw someone wearing that exact hoodie walking to the Rockies game on Sunday
by Muzia on Oct 13, 2009 2:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No way...I need to do some research!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Oct 13, 2009 5:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hoodie
I have a bright orange hoodie with the horse on acid. My wife had it commissioned for me last year – Christmas gift IIRC. At the time I thought it was cute, but never envisioned how appropriate it might become. I should post a photo of it up here one of these days…
Jeff Zepp, Kittredge CO USA
by Rzeppa on Oct 13, 2009 6:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
See, I liked the socks because they were offset by the plain helmets and jerseys.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 10:52 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, at least one of us liked them!
I like different. I’d never want to go back to those full-time, but I like being weird from time to time. :)
by BroncosBassist on Oct 13, 2009 8:25 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
totally!!!
bring them back every year! They were a big part of the drama of the NE game, imho.
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Oct 13, 2009 9:48 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
+100
LMAO
Those unis are just AWFUL
"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV
by sadaraine on Oct 13, 2009 9:49 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Says you

"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 10:53 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I …. had ….. no ….. idea
He looks embarrassed to come out of the dugout.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 11:00 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So that's the plan
Broncos subtly pull the history out from under the chargers based on geographic affinity and the honor of ignoble origins….It’s a conspiracy.
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Oct 13, 2009 11:13 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gasp I actually watched them play those
at Jack Murphy. Crap I’m getting old
by bchiper on Oct 13, 2009 12:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point with this picture
I would hope you would support who we are. Not, who we are not. Coach Norman Dale "Hoosiers"
by dmitchell624 on Oct 13, 2009 3:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I liked 'em
Those socks, I mean, they set the standard for ugly. How can you not love that?? Maybe that’s just me ;D
by AllBroncsallday on Oct 13, 2009 9:54 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man, I loved 'em!
Especially the socks! Without the vertical stripes, they would’ve just been another Jets or Eagles throwback look.
Like someone else said, a great place to visit, I just wouldn’t want to live there.
Richard Seymour is a girl.
by pubkeeper on Oct 13, 2009 10:11 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really.....
I think the Broncos are playing a little above their heads because of the momentum gained in victories against lesser teams, and I don’t know that they can prove themselves to be “elite” until they hang with the Colts, Giants, Eagles, Ravens, Steelers, etc.
So each game the Broncos win, the list of teams they need to hang with tends to shrink by one. I am getting quite sick of this. In my opinion, the Chargers need to prove they can hang with us…especially after their debacle against the Raiders. btw, the Ravens lost to the Bengals and Patriots…teams we both beat.
My question, how do you think the Chargers defense that has been gashed this season by the likes of JaMarcus Russell plans to stop the Broncos high-powered offense? Granted, Denver’s O started off slow this season, but it has started to come on as of late.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Oct 13, 2009 7:29 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
So each game the Broncos win, the list of teams they need to hang with tends to shrink by one. I am getting quite sick of this. In my opinion, the Chargers need to prove they can hang with us…especially after their debacle against the Raiders. btw, the Ravens lost to the Bengals and Patriots…teams we both beat.
You’re right, kindof. The Chargers need to prove they can hang with the Broncos, and the Ravens probably don’t belong in that group. However, the Colts, Giants, Eagles and Steelers are the elite teams in the NFL right now. Those are the four best SB contenders at this moment. If the Broncos can hang with them, they move into that group.
And no, the list will not always shrink by one. It was the Cowboys until everyone realized the Cowboys were terrible (they almost lost to the Chiefs!). The Patriots victory was legitimate, but one win does not catapult you into the “elite teams” conversation. You need at least one more against one of the four teams mentioned above. Just my opinion.
My question, how do you think the Chargers defense that has been gashed this season by the likes of JaMarcus Russell plans to stop the Broncos high-powered offense?
Gashed by JaMarcus Russell? Ouch. He completed 40% of his passes, threw 2 interceptions and finished with a QB rating of 47.6. His 200+ yards and the TD are only there because the Chargers blew an assignment and left Louis Murphy all alone for a 57 yard TD.
I have no idea how the Chargers plan to stop the Broncos offense. Jammer needs to be on Brandon Marshall, I know that. I also think Ron Rivera needs to stop playing scared and blitz like crazy. It’s really the only chance the Bolts have of slowing Denver down. If the Chargers D has shown a weakness this season, it’s against a team that can both run the ball and spread it out with lots of talented receivers (like Pittsburgh) and that’s exactly what Denver is.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 8:04 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well not to be a jerk but.....
We beat the bengals…….who beat the steelers……..one of the four teams you mentioned…..I would consider that indicative of our chances against Pit. No it doesn’t mean we WILL win but I certainly think it means we have a good chance against them……
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison
"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble
by DenBronx on Oct 13, 2009 8:33 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is going to sound homer-ish, but I can’t put my finger on the Bengals. I don’t know whether or not they’re actually good or just lucky. Also, the Bengals beat the Steelers when Willie Parker was struggling and Mendenhall was an afterthought.
While I agree the Broncos have a chance in the game, I’m going to wait until the actual game to see how it plays out.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 8:48 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is very simple
How many wins do the Bengals have? It isn’t about luck, or legitimacy…what is your record. The Bengals are a “Good Team” based on their 4 – 1 record. You can toss in some discussion about how many “good” or “poor” teams they beat, but with 5 games into the season I think you’d have to call the Bengals “Good” until they lose some more games.
Same thing with Denver…they are 5 – 0. Until they lose a game, I think you have to call them a “Great Team”. As much as that may pain a Charger fan, it is just how it is….I’m with Boydy…you can’t keep saying, “Yeah, but….” every week. This team is for real. Are we going to the playoffs? Who knows!? But we will COMPETE every week and find a way to win.
I am really looking forward to this game moreso than the New England game. To me it is like a pre-playoffs game. The implications are huge for our standing in the division…win and we have the AFC West by the throat. Lose and we let the Chargers stay in the race. Take it Broncos!!!
"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV
by sadaraine on Oct 13, 2009 9:56 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No offense
but if the situations were reversed, you would be pointing to the weak schedule as well.
Were the Rockies a “great” team when they made it to the world series? Not really, they just got hot. Is this a great Broncos team? I don’t think anybody knows yet, but at the very least they’re good. I think they’re similar to Cincinnati in that way.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 10:55 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am actually with John on this one.
I think the word “great” is overused, especially in the world of sports. I am reluctant to call this years Bronco team “great”. I think that’s something that should be left to be determined when the season is over.
I think the Broncos are playing well right now. I am still thinking 11-5, but words like “elite” and “great” I feel are a bit premature after only 5 games.
Blues. Cardinals. Broncos. Rockies (when not playing St. Louis!).
Drinkin' the orange kool-aid since the day McDaniels was hired.
Go DU hockey! Go Mammoth!
by HockeyHippie on Oct 13, 2009 11:26 AM MDT up reply actions 6 recs
Exactly
Nailed my thoughts. Rec’d
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks. And have really enjoyed perusing your site.
And the bolts on the white helmet (old school, baby) are sweet.
Blues. Cardinals. Broncos. Rockies (when not playing St. Louis!).
Drinkin' the orange kool-aid since the day McDaniels was hired.
Go DU hockey! Go Mammoth!
by HockeyHippie on Oct 13, 2009 11:43 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
-1
Read my post…I’m talking about the present…not some reflective point of view when the season is over.
My point of view stems from “Who are the great / elite teams right now in the NFL?”
"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV
by sadaraine on Oct 13, 2009 11:47 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No team can be called great/elite after 5 games.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:50 AM MDT up reply actions 3 recs
Really???
The Giants, Broncos, Colts, Vikings, and the Saints are THE elite teams right now in the NFL.
There, it has been done…not just for one team, but for five.
:P
"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV
by sadaraine on Oct 13, 2009 1:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
And look at who they've played.
Denver’s opponents have a higher winning percentage than all of the opponents of the teams that John listed. (No disrespect intended).
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 13, 2009 4:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
None taken at all
Great point if you do want to discuss strength of schedule. :)
"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV
by sadaraine on Oct 13, 2009 4:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We’re stating each other’s opinions and going around in circles. I think a team needs to be one of the best teams in the league for more than 5 games because I’m ready to call them great or elite. You think otherwise. Let’s agree to disagree.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 3:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
my definition of elite is even more harsh.
It is earned over a period of several years. To look only at Broncos history, the Orange Crush was an elite defense because it dominated for years. The same would be true of the Elway/Davis Broncos offenses, say ‘94 or ’95-’98. I think some of those Chargers teams in the past as well but don’t want to step on any toes.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on Oct 13, 2009 12:30 PM MDT up reply actions 6 recs
Symantics
I clarified mine above. If you associate “over a period of several years” with someone saying “elite team”, then yeah, I agree with your point of view. That very clearly is not what I am talking about though.
"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV
by sadaraine on Oct 13, 2009 3:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
this was my point exactly.
While I love my Broncos I am hesitant to heap the word “great” upon them just yet…..
Blues. Cardinals. Broncos. Rockies (when not playing St. Louis!).
Drinkin' the orange kool-aid since the day McDaniels was hired.
Go DU hockey! Go Mammoth!
by HockeyHippie on Oct 14, 2009 2:10 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is where I am as well HH
Our new DOOMesday Defense!!!! YOU LIKE??????????????
by Broncofan on Oct 13, 2009 12:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
rec'd this and agree
and thought i’d better leave a comment just so someone didn’t think it was a SD homer or anything
by Jenna Talia on Oct 13, 2009 2:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree too...
And no one can argue that we don’t have the opportunity to move into that elite group of teams, given that we play all of John’s fantastic foursome.
"I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today" -- Wimpy J. Wellington
by Broncs Cheer on Oct 13, 2009 3:35 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree as well.
We need to be thankful what we’ve doe so far but we need to prove this week the Chargers do not hold a mental edge over us. We got whupped pretty bad last year. New team, new coach, yes but it is still the Broncos/Chargers and its an intense rivalry!
We need to prove we can play with them this week. They are the power of the west in the last few years.
I would hope you would support who we are. Not, who we are not. Coach Norman Dale "Hoosiers"
by dmitchell624 on Oct 13, 2009 3:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
People get offended saying we have nothing to prove. It’s true we have nothing to prove to anyone. Except we need to prove to ourselves that we are mentally stronger now. We need to beat the Chargers not for league wide acceptance but for ourselves. We need to shake this demon.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Oct 13, 2009 10:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the word "great" is overused
Exactly, quoted for truth, and you get a Rec.
I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok.
Shaquille O'Neal
by tannji on Oct 13, 2009 5:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ya
Have you ever noticed that every game you watch the announcer seems to thing the QB playing is the greatest QB in the world. I hate how the media always bigs up players and teams for no real reason.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Oct 13, 2009 10:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No I actually wouldn't
You must not read me often, but I call it like it is. Yes there is something to be said for opinionated statements about competition. But that goes by the wayside at this point in the season…3 – 0 you can kinda talk about weak scheduleds…4 – 0 and you are a “Good” team…5 – 0 = “Great / Elite” until someone beats you.
If the Chargers were 5 – 0 and we were 2 – 2, I’d say the Chargers were “Elite” until we beat them.
Yes, the Broncos are a “Great” team right now. Beat us and I’ll downgrade to “Good”. The onus is on San Diego to beat us. We already have the status and need to just keep playing games week-by-week with the idea that we CAN take it.
"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV
by sadaraine on Oct 13, 2009 11:45 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
hmmmmmmm
sort of disagree but i’m loving the kool aid flavour !
but we have honestly had a little luck getting to where we are
great plays and great players making the difference, granted, but a coin toss for OT and a deflection for a game winning TD and our season looks a little different.
although i think if the Pats had won the toss our D would have held.
by Jenna Talia on Oct 13, 2009 2:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The coin toss
Our D had stopped the Pats on every drive of the 2nd half and 3 times on 1 drive alone. Losing that coin toss doesn’t mean we lose that game.
Same with the deflection. We only needed a FG to win that game. If the deflection never occurs, we still jhave a shot at moving into FG range. Not saying we would have won either game had those things occured/not occured but the deflection and coin toss were not the sole reasons we won those games. They were just how things played out, which happens in every single game played to some extent.
People can use statistics to prove anything, 87% of all people know that.
by c_style on Oct 14, 2009 3:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
actually...
the rockies had the best run differential in 2007 of all NL teams. They also had the 2nd lowest team ERA in the second half of the season (and thats before accounting for playing in an offense heavy ballpark)
SO no the 2007 rockies were not just lucky or just got hot… based on the whole season, they were one of the best teams in baseball.
Also Holliday touched home :)
by oxsnard on Oct 13, 2009 4:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You mention the Colts, Giants, Eagles, and Steelers as the elite teams
You say we need to prove we can hang on with them to prove we are elite. But that sounds like circular logic to me. Let me quickly breakdown my logic…
Colts: Have five wins against five teams that combine for eight wins, none of them have a winning record. How are the Colts proven to be a team that we have to prove we can hang on against?
Giants beat: Was, Dallas, TB, KC, and Oakland. That’s two teams Denver beat and no good teams Denver hasn’t. How are they already proven elite and we are not?
Eagles: They lost handedly to NO and beat Car, KC, and TB – teams that have one combined win between them. How is that proven elite to the point that we must prove against them?
Steelers: They lost to Chicago and Cincinatti (a team that we beat). They beat Ten, SD, and Det – teams that have a combined three wins.
None of the teams you mention as elite have beaten a winning team, let alone an elite team. We have beaten two good teams, maybe great – teams that have winning records even.
I’m going to tow the company line here and just say we have nothing to prove and nobody to worry about except that perpetual next game. Week six.
by elvisalex on Oct 13, 2009 9:56 AM MDT up reply actions 14 recs
+1
Great points elvisalex.
Here’s my wrinkle:
I would say that I would call any team that is undefeated “elite” until they get beat though…we are a quarter of the way into the season…lines have been drawn. NO, NY, IN, Den and MN are the cream of the crop so far.
"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV
by sadaraine on Oct 13, 2009 10:03 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting train of thought sadaraine, and I do see your point.
The beauty of our shedule this year is, while it may be the “gauntlet” many in the MSM and elsewhere (here?) were predicting, all these questions of semantics and definitions will inevitably answer themselves once we play the season out.
How many of those teams, looking at their schedules in the offseason, hearing all the supposed turmoil coming out of Denver in the offseason, marked the Broncos’ game down for a win? And now how many might be thinking, “Hmmmmmm, not so fast……..”
:)
Blues. Cardinals. Broncos. Rockies (when not playing St. Louis!).
Drinkin' the orange kool-aid since the day McDaniels was hired.
Go DU hockey! Go Mammoth!
by HockeyHippie on Oct 14, 2009 10:41 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
Especially the Giants, everyone has them as the best in the league and that’s who they’ve played? C’mon, that’s pathetic. That Dallas game was a shootout, too. Suddenly the shine is off them a little for me.
Richard Seymour is a girl.
by pubkeeper on Oct 13, 2009 10:16 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That makes me wonder
this early in the season, does anybody have a winning record that has played other teams with winning records more than once? It doesn’t seem like it.
Good analysis though. My point all along was a personal one. For me, I won’t be a believer in the Broncos until I see them beat a team that I consider to be one of the league’s best. That’s all.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:24 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep!
The Broncos (Dal, NE, Cin) and NE (Den, Bal, NYJ, Atl). Apart from that I don’t think so.
As elvisalex pointed out, we have had by far the hardest schedule of any undefeated team. This “They haven’t played anyone yet” argument is beyond bogus at this point. Not necessarily because we’re played the best teams (apart from NE, we haven’t) but because no one has yet (except NE). You, and everyone else, is basing their opinion of who the elite teams are on who was good last year which is IMO dumb, especially since Pittsburgh has done nothing this year to deserve the credit they’re getting.
by scannon on Oct 13, 2009 11:49 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This "They haven’t played anyone yet" argument is beyond bogus at this point. Not necessarily because we’re played the best teams (apart from NE, we haven’t) but because no one has yet (except NE).
I was not aware of that before. My apologies.
With that being said, I do not base my opinions off of who was good last year. I base my opinions off of my eyes and what I see.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:53 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Quality Standings
Cold Hard Football Facts tracks wins against quality teams, or teams with a winning record. Denver is one of three teams to have played three or more opponents with a winning record. San Diego has played two, and lost to both.
You can view the entire standings here.
by CoastalBronco on Oct 13, 2009 12:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
key quote
Only the Patriots and Saints have as many as two Quality Wins this year. So the Broncos are clearly shaping up as the class of the NFL, with wins over the 4-1 Bengals, 3-2 Patriots and 3-2 Cowboys. Those are three teams who are a combined 0-3 against Denver, but 10-2 against the rest of the league.
by CoastalBronco on Oct 13, 2009 12:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damn
Very interesting.
With that being said, the Cowboys suck (they’ve beaten TB, KC and CAR) and the win against the Bengals was lucky.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 12:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
fact check
The Bengals also have two Quality Wins (over Baltimore and Pittsburgh). Not sure why the didn’t mention them, since it’s reflected in their Quality Standings.
by CoastalBronco on Oct 13, 2009 12:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh noes
Labeling the Bengals win as “lucky” is liable to bring down a sh**storm of replies in these parts… I wish I’d warned you ahead of time.
Maybe we can just agree “good teams teams take advantage of their luck” and leave it at that, but somehow I doubt it.
by CoastalBronco on Oct 13, 2009 12:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll say what I said then
if that happened to the Chargers, I’d gladly take the win. Same thing as the Hochuli game. That doesn’t change the fact that it was an incredibly lucky play. Not one person can argue that it wasn’t lucky, since I’m pretty sure the ball bounced off a defenders chest.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 1:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually...
…the defender leaped high to get a hand on it for the deflection. Stokely being in position to catch it wasn’t just luck – both he and McDaniels said they had planned for Stokely to be nearby, expecting a lot of coverage on Marshall. Stokley was clearly on the lookout for the opportunity – it’s not like the deflected ball hit him in the face mask and got stuck there.
IT is, and it is impossible for IT not to be.
Parmenides (5th Century B. C. Greek)
by bradley on Oct 13, 2009 1:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I secretly wish that the defender hadn't got a hand on it.
(though it was a great play by him)… because Marshall would have caught it near the 50 with 20+ seconds remaining. The broncos get a field goal, then they stop saying “fluky” every time they talk about the broncos and bengals.
by SkinnyPB on Oct 13, 2009 2:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Denver earned the Bengals win, lucky play or no, by the way they played the rest of the game.
by CoastalBronco on Oct 13, 2009 4:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I agree to that, then Broncos fans have to admit the Chargers earned a win in the Hochuli game.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 3:41 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's laughable.
The call didn’t change the game. SD controlled their own fate. They still had mutliple chances to stop the Broncos from the TD, and still had the chance to stop the 2 pt conversion.
Blaming “luck” or game officials is for the raider nation, not fans of real teams. I’ve coached for many years, and never saw luck or officials as game changers.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 14, 2009 6:49 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
They did stop the TD.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 7:04 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, they didn't.
Even if you want to go that route, no SD player was involved with “the fumble”. It was a Denver error. SD did nothing to earn the win.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 14, 2009 7:10 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two things seem relevant to me
1) The team that wins is generally the one that does the least to beat itself. A lack of negatives beats a superfluity of positives. That might not sound uplifting, but successful coaches make careers out of it.
2) The outcome should be determined by the players, not the officials.
Thanks to Cutler’s decisive unforced error San Diego was ipso facto the team that did the least to beat itself . . . until Hochuli changed the outcome. Everything that happened after the game should have been over was illegitimate, in my opinion. At Cincinatti it was an error by the safety(s), not Stokley’s heads-up play, that cost them the game. Not all errors are so costly (several in the New England game went unpunished) but this one was decisive. No ref’s mistake intervened to save the Bengals, and it would have been an illegitimate win on their part if it had. Ergo, the Broncos’ win at Cinci was legitimate, the one at San Diego wasn’t. Just my opinion.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Oct 14, 2009 11:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can go with that.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 12:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously :)
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Oct 14, 2009 1:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would not say the Chargers earned that game
Because they did nothing to cause the Cutler fumble (which it was a fumble!).
I would say the Broncos would have lost that on a fluke play. Considering that I have never seen that happen to Cutler at any point in the rest of his career.
With that said, the Broncos were given a gift there and you can’t deny it.
Did they deserve to win. Probably not. Did San Diego. I give the same answer. Probably not.
They still had the chance to stop the TD and the 2 point conversion. But I’m not going to say they earned that victory.
To be honest, the following game against the Saints was the one we deserved to lose. We were offsides on 4th and 1. That would have given New Orleans a 1st down at around the Den 20. I don’t even think NO would have kicked a FG. Denver’s D had not stopped them all day. They looked like they would walk in for a TD and there would not have been enough time left for Denver.
by mjames82 on Oct 16, 2009 1:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
On Hochuli...
Sounds like the Chargers have a maturity-challenged fanbase. If your side wants to keep complaining about a bad call as the reason for the week 2 loss in 2008, then they need to also remember the following:
1. No one on the Broncos squad pretended that the call was correct. Cutler admitted it was a fumble in the press conference.
2. The Chargers should never have been down 31-17 at halftime. That’s on them and no team that is down by that margin at halftime should win a game in the NFL.
3. When the Broncos got the ball back, Cutler threw a TD pass to Royal, which was not well defended by the Chargers’ secondary.
4. When the Broncos elected to go for the 2-point conversion, they went back to the EXACT SAME PLAY and actually converted, once again, with Royal. Your team’s secondary failed on the same play twice in a row that a good defense would have stopped.
It seems to me, that the Chargers and their collective fans need to grow up and get with the program. Life is unfair – suck it up.
And oh by the way…it’s 2009, and we’re coming to town on Monday. You might want to focus on that instead of things you can no longer change.
by Horsepower on Oct 13, 2009 7:51 PM MDT up reply actions 9 recs
rec'd
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 14, 2009 6:49 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
And to put it a little more to bed
I distinctly remember the announcers in the later 2008 Denver at San Diego game referring to a questionable call as “payback” or “making it even” or something…and then the Broncos lost by 30+ points, which made even a spectacularly calculated and bad call pretty uninteresting.
Let’s call it even and start fresh. The future is where all the interesting football will be played.
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Oct 14, 2009 7:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice comment, Horsepower
But you forgot to mention that the Cutler fumble cost the Broncos a down (3rd) and 7 or 8 yards. Chargers fans don’t like to acknowledge that. Especially since the fumble wasn’t the result of anything the Chargers did.
IT is, and it is impossible for IT not to be.
Parmenides (5th Century B. C. Greek)
by bradley on Oct 14, 2009 7:54 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone's ignored the fact that if that pass falls incomplete
the Broncos still have 40 seconds and a time out to make a play and hit a long field goal. That was not a do-or-die play!
That said it worked out well for us, but there’s alot of teams in this league who may not not have even been in the position to “get lucky.”
by ThunderBringer on Oct 13, 2009 9:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Broncos WRs
practice tip drills. It’s the closest receiver’s responsibility to gallop (I couldn’t resist) over to the area where the ball is thrown, just in case it is dropped, fumbled, batted down by the defender, etc.
Stokley did his job and put himself in great position to create his own luck.
Stokley’s catch and run was great and the coaching that he is receiving is even better.
by Horsepower on Oct 13, 2009 10:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Long Field Goal?
If that pass is incomplete, there’s 30 seconds left and the Broncos are on their own 13! What world do you live in where 30 seconds and a time out makes is easy to get 60+ yards downfield and hit a FG?
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 3:44 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What world do we live in?
You make it sound like a fantasy! The funny part is, Denver didn’t dream it, they DID it! and more than score a FG, they scored the TD!
Come over and answer some friendly questions. Griping about Holuchi, griping about our TD against the Bengals, and calling our HC “BS” and a jackass (after asking folks to be civil about your own HC) isn’t the way to come to someone else’s site for a friendly chat.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 14, 2009 6:53 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You really need to read what I wrote before you start accusing me of calling your HC BS and a jackass. I did no such thing.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 7:05 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just read it again.
And it looks like several other members did too.
Stick to one defense. First you say that calling someone BS is different from saying they are full of BS. Then you deny you said anything of the sort at all.
Stick to telling folks about your team, and not insulting our coach and members (I guess Pubkeeper is a jackass, or you’ve apologized, or you’re going to say you never wrote either).
C’mon man. You’re better than this.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 14, 2009 7:14 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
1. I never said he was BS or that he was full of BS. I said he has BS, or baggage or a schtick, that players will put up with because he has a brilliant offensive mind. It was supposed to be a compliment.
2. I was asked for my opinion and gave it. I did not mean to insult your coach as a person, but I was trying to point out that I think he mishandled his first offseason. That is all.
I will continue to deny that I have some vendetta against McD or that I called him some names. I did no such thing. I criticized an action, and admittedly used too harsh of language to do so. I then responded in an angry tone when my criticism was met with insults and biting sarcasm.
Let’s straighten this out and drop it, because I feel like a high school girl:
1. I think McD mishandled the Cutler saga.
2. I think McD is not necessarily a players’ coach, but his players will continue to buy in as long as he’s having success.
3. pubkeeper is not a jackass.
4. What I said was not meant to be an insult or trash talk. It was simply my opinion, which I was asked for.
5. Fine, go ahead and take your shots at Norv Turner if it will make you feel better. However, I am not asking for your opinion of him.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 8:09 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just one little quibble.
You’ve never heard me take a crack at Turner. I happen to think he’s led a team that has topped the AFC West for a long while. I have nothing but respect for him.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Oct 14, 2009 8:47 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you've gotten more grief over this
than you deserve, John, but if you’d originally said, “I think McD mishandled the Cutler saga,” you’d have gotten a lot less than you did. Loaded terms invite misunderstanding. Mind you, I wouldn’t have agreed with you, but I can understand someone not close to the situation feeling that way. After all, many Broncos fans still feel that way even in the face of the Broncos’ subsequent success.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Oct 14, 2009 12:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed, but personally
I’m glad John responded the way I did. I would have been disappointed if he’d minced words. The man is a Charger fan, guys, what do we expect? He would love us? I think his tone is fine, and he’s been pretty diplomatic in defending himself. And I took the term “jackass” as a friendly prod, not as antagonism. Guess the rivalry has a few of us a little riled up! Oughta be fun to watch our guys take it out on the field Monday night!
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Oct 15, 2009 7:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are obviously delusional man
I said nothing about it being easy. It happens more than you think though. The first example that comes to mind is Chicago at Atlanta last year (granted the field position was more favorable). While it’s obvious that things looked grim for the Broncos if that pass falls incomplete, I only said that the play itself was not a do or die play there was still a chance afterwards. I have witnessed Prater hit from 70 in pregame warmups at three different stadiums (two open-air) while I realize this is not a gametime situation you can’t deny the guy can kick the ball some distance.
I don’t understand what world I live in when a head blogger at a fansite has communication skills that are on par with that of my brother’s children. Please stop putting words in my mouth…
by ThunderBringer on Oct 15, 2009 8:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very Very interesting.
Love this kind of stuff. Here’s hoping we are looking at the 2009 Denver Broncos as a “great” team when the season is over.
One thing, and it’s just my opinion obviously, is I don’t think Coach McDaniels and Coach Dawkins (stole that from Guru) are going to let our Broncos rest on their laurels or get too full of themselves.
I am really, really looking forward going into every game knowing our boys are gonna be incredibly focused on that game.
I didn’t always feel that way the past couple of years, 2008 especially.
Blues. Cardinals. Broncos. Rockies (when not playing St. Louis!).
Drinkin' the orange kool-aid since the day McDaniels was hired.
Go DU hockey! Go Mammoth!
by HockeyHippie on Oct 14, 2009 2:17 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's because
there are a boatload of crap teams this year…moreso than any year I’ve ever seen. It’s almost as nobody has played anybody good because half the league is garbage a quarter of the league is decent to good and the rest are good to great. Nobody knows anything yet. All teams are a question mark to be honest with you.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Oct 13, 2009 10:08 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
that is u right
john and on some lever its just but hontst if u dont count the sd game we wont play a super team utill thansgiveing and on mcd i feit the same way u did on the cutler seciaro see my jr high teacher in 8th grade called me the master of conmise whien i can see both sides of a disaggremt
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
by j-man on Oct 14, 2009 7:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
IMO those teams are considered elite because they are consistently good.
We haven’t proved anything except we are undefeated this season.
I would love for Denver to be considered “elite” next year when they come back to defend their Super Bowl victory. :)
Blues. Cardinals. Broncos. Rockies (when not playing St. Louis!).
Drinkin' the orange kool-aid since the day McDaniels was hired.
Go DU hockey! Go Mammoth!
by HockeyHippie on Oct 13, 2009 11:30 AM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
Short answer:
Indianapolis Colts: 10-6, 12-4, 12-4, 14-2, 12-4 (won S.B.), 13-3, 12-4, 5-0.
New York Giants: 10-6 (won S.B.), 12-4, 5-0.
Body . . . of . . . work.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Oct 14, 2009 10:55 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
couldn't have put it better myself
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Oct 15, 2009 7:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you wanna be
Totally clear on us, we have beaten 3 good teams. Cinci is underated, and Dallas my be overrated, but neither is a bad team this year. So Cinc, Dal, and NE. I agree though, we have nothing to prove anymore. We need only to continue at this level, while improving on offense, and staying consistent on defense. If we do that, we will be ELITE
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison
"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble
by DenBronx on Oct 14, 2009 11:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The JaMarcus Russell comment was a double pun. lol
I guess I suck at that…but I was laughing when I typed that. ;-) My point was, the chargers almost lost to the Raiders! The Raiders!
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Oct 13, 2009 11:40 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Richard Seymour was absolutely ridiculous in that game. I think that’s the best game any 3-4 DE has ever had. He almost won the thing by himself.
Also, the Raiders realized early that nothing was getting called and started playing dirty. That’s why Hardwick and Vasquez got injured in that game.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:42 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Ron Rivera
is too busy trying to sabotage Norv to worry about calling the defense. He got kicked out of Chicago for pulling that crap. He managed to sabotage Ted C to get him fired, take his job, and hire his own people. Now he is doing the same thing with Norv. I hope he succeeds. Tell Ron Thanks for Wayne Nunely if you see him. He is doing an awesome job with the Denver D Line.
by jayrocksd on Oct 13, 2009 2:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1 Zappa...
not to mention that Cinci beat Pittsburgh, Baltimore (lost to NE) and Greenbay…Chicago beat Pittsburgh (off of missed FG’s, but win a win), Pitt beat SD (no Polumalu)…we beat Cinci, Dallas and NE, other than the Colts and Giants, I think the Broncos have currently proved more this season than anyone else left on their schedule.
If we come into SD and beat you in your own house, then go into the bye week 6-0…it’s gonna be real hard to argue against our strips.
you already know.
by justwhytee on Oct 13, 2009 5:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looking at who beat who is bogus
This is a game of matchups and some teams match up better than other teams. If Cincy beat Baltimore it doesn’t have any relation to any previous or future Baltimore game. All it means is that day, Cincy had a gameplan and the personnel to beat Baltimore. That is it.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Oct 13, 2009 10:17 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
Great post T!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Oct 14, 2009 5:34 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for coming by. SHould be a good game...
Here at MHR, I volunteered to do a season preview on the San Diego Chargers. From the get go, and before the injuries, I saw you guys REALLY struggling on both lines.
I was always concerned on the health of Williams, thought the loss of Oshansky was big, had concerns about McNeill coming back and Merriman coming back from injuries. Had to scratch my head on the loss of Mike Goff (who, although, not great, was not replaced with anyone better).
You have since had a litany of injuries, and no feasible way of running the ball. LT is nothing but servicable, and Sproles is a change up back and BEAST on ST.
My point being, I am shocked at the drafting and strategy that AJ SMith has taken in the last 3 seasons. No heir apparent to Williams, not help on either lines, and lack of quality back ups.
What are the feelings of fans of the Chargers?
I think Rivers is one of the best, but that O line will get him killed and D line cant stop anyone at present.
So what is it….drafting, coaching, a mixture?
I would love your take.
Thanks again!
Boydy.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Oct 13, 2009 7:55 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
My point being, I am shocked at the drafting and strategy that AJ Smith has taken in the last 3 seasons. No heir apparent to Williams, not help on either lines, and lack of quality back ups. What are the feelings of fans of the Chargers?
You nailed it. A lot of Chargers fans are looking at the lack of depth on both lines and blaming the draft strategy. I’m looking at it a little more realistically.
You simply cannot keep 2 starter-caliber offensive lineman and a starter-caliber nose tackle sitting on the bench. The Chargers drafted Vaughn Martin to take over for Jamal next year or in 2011, with Ian Scott and Ryon Bingham as the backup defensive linemen for 2009. Unfortunately, Williams and Bingham are on IR and Scott was cut due to injuries. The injuries on the Chargers defensive line is comparable to the Broncos RB injuries last year: you simple cannot plan for that level of destruction on your roster.
The offensive line is getting a little better. Vasquez is an improvement over Goff, who was terrible in 2008 (Goff was signed by the Chiefs to be a starter and they had to trade for someone to start in front of him in training camp after realizing how washed up he is). What killed the Chargers is that they had depth for one major injury on the offensive line, not two at the exact same time. Vasquez is back and the offensive line looked much better with him in there against Pittsburgh, but losing Hardwick is a killer because he calls out the blocking assignments (his absence is why Ray Lewis almost killed Sproles). Mruczkowski is serviceable as a Center, but what the offensive line really needs is a lead so they can get into a rhythm with the running game.
I think Rivers is one of the best, but that O line will get him killed and D line cant stop anyone at present. So what is it….drafting, coaching, a mixture?
As I mentioned above, part of it is an incredible amount of injuries on the defensive line and unplanned injuries on the offensive line. I don’t know that you can blame that on drafting, but you could argue that the team should’ve kept another offensive lineman on the roster instead of 2 FBs, 4 RBs or 6 Safeties.
I blame coaching for the fact that the Chargers seem to come out flat in the first half of each game and the first half of each season. I blame negligence on the GM’s part for not having a young RB or suitable SS on the roster. I blame bad luck for the problems on the defensive line, and poor planning by the entire front office for the problems on the offensive line.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 8:17 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Thanks John...appreciate the answer. Enjoy your time here at MHR!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Oct 13, 2009 8:22 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great answer John
The injury bug is a friggin nightmare.
"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV
by sadaraine on Oct 13, 2009 10:04 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
werd
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Oct 13, 2009 10:09 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting take
I love these discussions with other teams. Thanks for swinging by John.
by rollinthunder on Oct 13, 2009 10:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I find it interesting that they have 6 Safeties on the roster, but none of them are good (suitable in John’s words) Strong Safeties. Wow. Kind of feels like us from 2008.
by BroncosBassist on Oct 13, 2009 1:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What is your take on Merriman?
I’ve watched a couple of games this year and he isn’t playing up to what he was before the injury. Do you think he pushed coming back or is it more a mental thing that he needs to work through? Before the injury he was fearsome and I just don’t get that sense at the moment.
by bchiper on Oct 13, 2009 8:38 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
My gut...he will be traded...or at least they will try....by the weekend. AJ has had enough of the guy!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Oct 13, 2009 8:45 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha
AJ has enough of Shawne a year ago. Nobody is going to offer anything for Merriman because 1) he hasn’t shown his knee is healthy, 2) he was recently in the newspapers for the wrong reasons and 3) he is unsigned past this season. He’ll play out his contract and sign somewhere else next year, unless a new CBA is not agreed upon in time.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 8:51 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
might the Pats pick him up?
Seems like they could use a little more LB action, and BB seems to be able to get guys in line and extend their football lifespans.
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Oct 13, 2009 10:14 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Next season?
It’s possible, but I don’t see them paying a lot for him.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:01 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe the Raiders sign him?
With Richard Seymore already locked up for the whole year, Merriman would be the perfect player to add for the remainder of the year. Could be the defensive addition they need to, um…sweep the Chiefs?
by Dwhite on Oct 13, 2009 5:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly, I don’t think he’d sign with them. They play 4-3 mostly, it’s not a big market and they haven’t shown an ability to win.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 3:47 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
His knee is at about 75%, his groin is probably worse and I can’t help but notice that he spent so much time in the gym when he was injured that he’s now more “bulky” than flexible. Before his groin put him on the sidelines, he was looking better and better each week. I’m hoping for a big second half of the season from him and not expecting anything before that.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 8:49 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats a good point John....
Too much gym leads to lack of speed, agility, and flexibility……BAD for a rushing OLB.
Compare to Dumervil who has LOST weight, become sleeker and built endurance to become a rushing OLB. Doom has 8 sacks, a lot of tackles, a forced fumble, a fumble recovery…he is becoming a complete player!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Oct 13, 2009 8:55 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t fault him for it. I think Shawne was dying to contribute last year and since he couldn’t he figured he’d get in the best shape of his life, but at this point he looks more like a FB or HB (Michael Pittman?) or MLB than a pass-rusher.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 9:11 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, with injuries like that it would be really hard to maintain flexibility, and hard to ease off on the weights when you are frustrated you can’t play.
"My job description is to win football games. I'm a hard worker. I'm not flashy by any means, but my job is to play football and win and I plan to do that." Kyle Orton
by odarol on Oct 13, 2009 9:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
His upper body has gotten HUGE since last season because he needed to feel like he was doing something. He should’ve been doing yoga instead.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 3:48 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or maybe zen meditation
To ease the pain of this coming Monday’s gridiron experience.
Sorry, that was (weak) smack.
You’ve nailed it, though: there are a lot of flexibility-related workouts that might have changed his season: my understanding is that a lot of teams with lower-than-average injury rates (like the Broncos this year) have some pretty cutting-edge flexibility training in their strength & conditioning.
Do you think that the Chargers may have a wider issue with offseason training (too much “strength” and not enough “conditioning”) or is this an isolated incident of a guy being too competitive for his own good?
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Oct 14, 2009 7:34 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do you think that the Chargers may have a wider issue with offseason training (too much "strength" and not enough "conditioning") or is this an isolated incident of a guy being too competitive for his own good?
Both. I think a lot of the injuries (we’ve had a rash of groin injuries) have to do with too much strength training. I think Merriman, training on his own, took it to an even higher place. He had a lot of concern for his strength and not a ton for his flexibility, and it will slow him down in his recovery from knee surgery.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 8:12 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
adhesions
They are created in the kind of surgery Merriman had. Until they break back down, the rate of groin injuries (and some others) will be higher. tough situation – usually takes another year. Best of luck to him
Hillis/Moreno in '09
by Emmett Smith on Oct 13, 2009 6:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had forgotten about the groin injury.....
and the bulk reminds of Mark McGwire one year for the A’s. He was coming off a monster home run year, bulked up in the off season and couldn’t hit anything.
Thanks for your insight.
by bchiper on Oct 13, 2009 9:07 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Super Bowl talent?
If I don’t have something nice to say, don’t say anything at all.
The Bolts have cool throwbacks, much nicer looking that what we won last Sunday.
Over the last four years, the MSM is always talking about the top shelf talent all over San Diego’s roster when the MSM is constantly picking San Diego to represent the AFC in the Super Bowl. Do you think Cromartie, Phillips, Castillo, Weddle and McNeil are top shelf talent or average NFL starters (like I do).
Love the Broncos. Mike Nolan is a genius.
by McGeorge on Oct 13, 2009 9:36 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Here’s the Chargers top shelf talent:
Philip Rivers
Vincent Jackson
Nick Hardwick (when healthy)
Jamal Williams
Luis Castillo
Quentin Jammer
There’s a bunch of guys on the verge. Weddle’s right there. Cromartie would be if he tried harder. McNeill was for his rookie season. It’s a talented roster, there’s just no good scheming behind it.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:04 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Love Weddle
He is going to be very very good
by phondonkey on Oct 13, 2009 1:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
The problem he has right now is that he’s playing FS and SS by himself pretty much. he spends so much time covering for other people that sometimes he’s not in the position to make the interception that he normally would’ve.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 1:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can agree on Rivers, Jackson, Hardwick and Jammer (totally underrated), but J Williams is on IR (and not his former dominant self).
It’s a reach to put Castillo in there with the guys above.
Even you have to admit, your roster looked a lot better in 2006 and 2007 than it does today. AJ Smith has some rather forgetfull drafts from 2006-2009.
Love the Broncos. Mike Nolan is a genius.
by McGeorge on Oct 13, 2009 3:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jamal WIlliams is definitely dominant when he’s healthy. The same for Castillo, who is having his first healthy season in a long time and demanding double-teams.
The 2006 draft was great (currently 3 starters, 2 backups), the 2007 draft was okay (1 starter, 4 backups) and the 2008 draft was pretty awful (nickel corner, part-time FB).
The problem with the Chargers roster, and it’s a problem we always knew was coming, was that it had too much talent. They couldn’t sign back everybody because it’d be too expensive. Also, most of the team’s leaders (McCree, Edwards, Godfrey, Neal, Goff) got too old to retain. Replacing each of them with a young leader with equal talent has proven to be difficult. You can even throw Jamal Williams and LaDainian Tomlinson into that category of guys who were in their prime 2-3 years ago and too old to contribute now, but there’s no decent backup plan.
I’ve never liked the “the window of opportunity is closing” phrase, but it appears the Chargers hung onto their 2007 roster too long and didn’t build enough towards the future in some key spots. That’s a real problem right now, as the Chargers are forcing young kids who aren’t ready (Nwagbuo, English, Martin, Vasquez) onto the field in hopes that they’re stars by the end of the season, is that the Bolts are trying to do 3 years of building in one season.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 3:56 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very informative answer
Thanks.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Oct 14, 2009 12:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Think Steven Colbert
Norv Turner: Horrible head coach, or worst head coach?
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 9:40 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Definitely not the worst.
Unless he breaks an assistant’s jaw and trades Rivers for J-Russ. ^^
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Oct 13, 2009 10:17 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
long live crazy Al and the gang. As long as they can keep propping him up Weekend at Bernie’s style the Faders are doomed.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 10:26 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's classic!
Blues. Cardinals. Broncos. Rockies (when not playing St. Louis!).
Drinkin' the orange kool-aid since the day McDaniels was hired.
Go DU hockey! Go Mammoth!
by HockeyHippie on Oct 13, 2009 11:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Defense
With the way your defense is going and the new coaches you brought in, do you think San Diego’s days of running the 3-4 are numbered? Is it only a matter of time before you switch to the 4-3?
When you can do the common things in life in a uncommon way, you will command the attention of the world.
- George Washington Carver
How do you keep the Broncos Humble?
"Just show them the film. Show them the film." - Josh McDaniels
by Kfustud on Oct 13, 2009 9:46 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
AHHHHHHH
My head is going to explode if I hear that one more time.
Look, the Chargers have spent a decade building a roster suitable for the 3-4. They have CBs that are good in man coverage but not in zone zoverage. They have LBs that are good at covering half the field and not an inch more. They have OLBs that can rush the passer but would be useless as DEs. They have DEs that would be terrible as 3-4 DEs and almost as bad as DTs.
To run an effective 4-3 defense, you need a couple of things. You need good safeties, CBs who can play zone, 2 DEs that can effective rush the passer and a beast of a MLB. That would require the Chargers to overhaul their entire roster, which would take at least 3 years to do and be a waste of a ton of money.
I think it’s only a matter of time before they stop letting a 4-3 D coordinator try to run a 3-4 D and they get somebody who knows what the hell they’re doing. If the Chargers don’t make the playoffs this season, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Nolan interviewing for Norv’s job in the offseason.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:08 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
You. Can't. Have. Him.
Nolan is ours. Denver fans will personally chip in $50 apiece for his Christmas bonus. You think I’m kidding?
It will take a few years for the bad taste of the first HC experience to leave Nolan, and in the meantime he is being handed the keys to the city of Denver.
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Oct 13, 2009 11:20 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
your dang right
I’ll even give $51. I don’t think Nolan is going to try for HC again for a little while anyway, especially if the seson contiues as it has.
"My job description is to win football games. I'm a hard worker. I'm not flashy by any means, but my job is to play football and win and I plan to do that." Kyle Orton
by odarol on Oct 13, 2009 9:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t understand that logic. He wanted to be a head coach and failed because of a horrible situation. If a good situation comes along after this season, why would he turn it down? Because he’d rather stay in the shadows?
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 3:57 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the light shining on the shadow is bright enough
I can’t speak for the guy, but if I were in his shoes: say, if I had tried running my own engineering company and failed (I actually run a successful one) I think I would be pretty happy with a VP-ship down the street, with someone else worrying about paying the taxes on time, etc.
Sure it may chafe eventually, but if you count the number of times he has been awarded the nonexistent “assistant of the year” on this site alone, and then compare it to the 2 years of loathing he received as a HC…where supposedly you have a chance to make your own situation (see exhibit a: Josh McD)… It just sounds nicer to be a beloved DC.
Of course, we have a vested interest in him staying and will probably go to considerable lengths to convince ourselves of its inevitability. You have a vested interest in the opposite.
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Oct 14, 2009 7:39 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
In certain respects
McDaniels came into a difficult situation, too, and he changed it, almost instantly, with exceptional coaching, shrewd personnel moves, and inspired coaching hires. A successful head coach finds a way to be successful. Mediocre head coaches are derailed by circumstances. Nolan might of course have learned from the experience enough to be a successful head coach on his next try, but I hope we have his services for at least a few more years.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Oct 14, 2009 12:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Imagine if Belicheck hadn't been given a 2nd chance and offered the NE job....
we might not have Coach McDaniels.
Blues. Cardinals. Broncos. Rockies (when not playing St. Louis!).
Drinkin' the orange kool-aid since the day McDaniels was hired.
Go DU hockey! Go Mammoth!
by HockeyHippie on Oct 14, 2009 12:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Belichick being successful
on his second try was exactly what I was thinking of!
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Oct 14, 2009 1:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
no logic involved
I just want him to stay
"My job description is to win football games. I'm a hard worker. I'm not flashy by any means, but my job is to play football and win and I plan to do that." Kyle Orton
by odarol on Oct 14, 2009 10:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not unlike Shanahan ^^
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Oct 15, 2009 7:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would be my 2nd worst nightmare...
… The first being Shanahan with Rivers and the Chargers…
by topnation on Oct 13, 2009 11:21 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Both will be considered
I don’t think you can speak for Nolan about whether or not he’d take another HC gig. The fact of the matter is that he took a job with a terrible team that drafted a terrible QB and got stuck. If the Chargers show up, he may look at Rivers and sign himself up.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:26 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Holy crap!
Imagine that! Shanny with Rivers and his latests 6th round unknown RB pick from Georgia, whoever thqat might be. Imagine the fast starts they would get off to, the first half leads, how well they would do early in the season! And then the blown leads, the late season collapses, all the defensive coordinators they would go through.
It actually is kind of sobering. Shanny always had NEs number.
by broncimo on Oct 13, 2009 11:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Somehow
I don’t think Rivers would let that happen.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rivers can’t tackle the opposing RBs that keep him off the field as they put up first downs and touch downs with relative ease.
Love the Broncos. Mike Nolan is a genius.
by McGeorge on Oct 13, 2009 3:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shanahan's defenses were pretty good his first few years here
but he responded to adversity as control freaks often do, by trying to bring more and more facets of the organization under his direct control. Shanahan as only the head coach, especially if he does better at delegating responsibility for defense and special teams than he did the last few years, will be a tough opponent. After failing and learning from it, having a year off to recharge his batteries and rethink his approach, he’ll come back stronger than ever. We’d be foolish to underestimate him. I hope he ends up in the NFC.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Oct 13, 2009 3:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on Oct 13, 2009 4:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't mean to come off too harshly towards Shanny
He is and always has been a class act and we owe him a lot. that being said, we stagnated and he refused to see or address it. It seemed that, in his later years, he adapted very little to a league that had caught up with him, and I suspect you’re right in that a lot of this was ego driven.
In part, that’s why McDaniels is so refreshing.
Just my humble take.
by broncimo on Oct 13, 2009 5:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed Spock.
I won’t ever underestimate Coach Shanahan. But, as has been said numerous times before, GM Shanahan kept letting Coach Shanahan down.
Blues. Cardinals. Broncos. Rockies (when not playing St. Louis!).
Drinkin' the orange kool-aid since the day McDaniels was hired.
Go DU hockey! Go Mammoth!
by HockeyHippie on Oct 14, 2009 12:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The best part about Shanahan...
Is that he is committed to Bob Slowik as his D-coordinator. They visited a few teams together during training camps. Good luck with Slowik!
by mjames82 on Oct 16, 2009 1:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
I like your answer
I think it’s only a matter of time before they stop letting a 4-3 D coordinator try to run a 3-4 D and they get somebody who knows what the hell they’re doing.
That would be the flip side of the coin I guess. Admitting that right now you have a mismatch and you either go all 4-3 (with new personnel) or all 3-4 (with new coaching).
Thanks for Nunnely btw.
When you can do the common things in life in a uncommon way, you will command the attention of the world.
- George Washington Carver
How do you keep the Broncos Humble?
"Just show them the film. Show them the film." - Josh McDaniels
by Kfustud on Oct 13, 2009 11:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it’s easier just to get a 3-4 coach instead of trying to rebuild the entire defensive roster. Especially with all the time and money invested in the roster against the coaching (this is Rivera’s first full season as a 3-4 coordinator).
Nunnely rocks but Rivera wanted to bring in all of his old Chicago pals. I wish he hadn’t.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:34 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Agree
Personnel wise Denver was lucky that we didn’t have the personnel to run our defense anyway so why not make the whole switch. I don’t think San Diego is in that same situation.
Just right now without your starting NT and being unable to stop the run I wonder if the coaching staff will get desperate. As you have hinted, they are playing for their jobs. Do you see a turnaround on Defense soon, honestly?
When you can do the common things in life in a uncommon way, you will command the attention of the world.
- George Washington Carver
How do you keep the Broncos Humble?
"Just show them the film. Show them the film." - Josh McDaniels
by Kfustud on Oct 13, 2009 11:37 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
A turnaround for the defense would immediately follow these things:
-Merriman getting 100% healthy and getting sacks
-Ogemdi Nwagbuo playing good enough to get double-teamed.
If those things happen (and they might), the defense will improve drastically.
The Chargers, when trying to stop the run, have actually played a lot of 4-3 this season in the Nickel package. It’s been a little better against the run and terrible against the pass.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:44 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which makes me wonder my Nunnely, perhaps the BEST 3-4 line coach, was let go by Norv and Rivera???
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Oct 13, 2009 12:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rivera
replaced just about the entire defensive staff with his former Chicago Bears defensive staff.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 12:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seems to be working...NOT.....I hate when that happens. Sorry it happened as Nunnely is good...and we are stoked to have him!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Oct 13, 2009 12:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for stopping by
With our old QB now in Chicago and Mr. Shanahan taking a year off, do you feel that the SD versus Denver rivalry has lessened? With Denver off to a great start how hungry is the SD fan base for this win? I guess I’m asking for the ‘pulse’ of the team and its fan base coming into Monday Night.
Thanks again!
by elvisalex on Oct 13, 2009 10:02 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Exploding
and it’s only Tuesday. Rivalry or not (and there’s definitely some heat there after the two HUGE games last season), this is a game that the Chargers’ entire season rests on. A lot of jobs as well. If the Chargers lose in embarrassing fashion, everybody is fired but Rivers.
The much pressure and intensity might be a bad thing, but it could also be a good thing if it’s focused properly.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:10 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Legit question
CSU alum here. I saw that Gartrell Johnson had at least one big game in the preseason and honestly think he is going to turn out to be a steal for the bolts. What is his current status on the team and what do you see his role being in the future? And, Gartrell Johnson: Great running back, or greatest running back?
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 10:11 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
GO RAMS!!
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison
"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble
by DenBronx on Oct 13, 2009 10:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
at least they beat CU
but the last two losses have been painful to watch. Up 17-3 against Utah at home and then just puke it away?
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 10:37 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gartrell is now a NY Giant
Honestly, he showed in the preseason why he slipped so far down. He had no power (surprisingly) and even less speed.
When the Chargers lines started losing bodies, he was waived and was picked up by the Giants. I think he’s doing better with them, which makes sense because of their big offensive line.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:12 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
Shows what I know. I feel shame as a CSU alum to not have known that. But the bolts will rue the day they waived The Predator! Rue the day, I say! Of course, I also thought that BVP would become the second coming of Steve Young. Maybe I’m a bit of a homer for my ex-Rams?
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 11:25 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Possibly
I used to be a MWC homer. I thought Cecil Sapp was going to be great.
There’s one play that really defined Gartrell’s time with the Chargers. It was a preseason game and the offensive line blew up a HUGE hole. There was nobody in front of Gartrell and it turned into a 13 yard carry because he was run down by a DT. I watched that Fresno State game, I thought he was amazing, but compared to NFL standards he is sllllooooowwww
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:28 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
even more OT
But the MWC has certainly gotten the shaft by the BCS. They went 7-2 agains the Pathetic 10 last season, Utah went undefeated and beat Alabama in the bowl, and nobody even mentioned them in the championship mix. What a crock the BCS is. Even fricken Wyoming, a horrible MWC team, went to Tennessee and beat them last season.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 11:40 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
gartrell was cut and is with the Giants!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Oct 13, 2009 12:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
All about drafting
Thanks so much for the mature participation.
The big shock in Denver this year is not, IMHO, that Orton turned out to be a hell of a player, or that McD turned out to be smarter than the local sportswriters… it is how stunningly effective the 2009 draft has been.
We picked: (1) RB Moreno, OLB Ayers (2) CB Smith, S McBath, TE Quinn, S Bruton, OG Olsen, WR McKinley, QB Branstater, C Schleuter
The first 8 players are all making serious contributions: some of them winning awards and national recognition. Of course the QB hasn’t played, but there was some semi-serious “bench Orton, put the rook in, what do we have to lose (sobs in beer)” talk in the preseason. Schleuter plays for Miami, I think.
You spoke above about the Charger’s poor draft logic for the past three years, but could you break down this years’ draft for us?
Oh, and by the way (whispers with head hung low): Phillis called it on Cutler. JC may be a great QB eventually, but he really was a baby in 2007. Us Broncos fans just had to suck it up and defend him because it seemed like the whole team was riding on the success or failure of a strong-armed quarterback, and the rest of the team actually suffered because of…………is this sounding familiar?
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Oct 13, 2009 10:21 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Let's review
English – Getting a ton of playing time because of Merriman’s groin injury. Seems to be improving incrementally each game. Hard to argue that he’s anything but an average OLB pass rusher at this point.
Vasquez – Starting at RG and looking great doing it. The worry with him was in his run-blocking, but he hasn’t had to do a lot of that. The trick for him is staying healthy. I think he’s recovering from his third foot-injury already.
Green – A Guard turned Center that the team is afraid to use for some reason. He played some Guard in the preseason and looked…..ok? The transition to Center does not seem like it’s going as smoothly as planned. He won’t see time this season.
Johnson – Waived and picked up by the NY Giants
Hughes – Placed on Injured Reserve late in preseason.
Ellison – The third-string SS (I know that sound ridiculous). He is atrocious is coverage and is more like a LB at this point. He’s been in on a handful of goal-line plays.
Byrd – Placed on Injured Reserve in the preseason. Recovering from head trauma from a car accident a week before the draft.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:17 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
In regards to English
I must say that I’m a fan of Robert Ayers, mostly I’m sure because he’s a Bronco, and I drink the Kool-Aid. But I think we can contribute his success to the fact that he’s been used in a rotation, not relied upon to contribute like a veteran starter, and put in situations where he can be successful.
On the flip side. Larry English has been asked to step in and be THE MAN right away. I haven’t seen much of him, but I think it is wise to hold off on evaluation of him as a pass rusher. He has a much tougher task than Ayers does (since he has Elvis Dumervil on the other side)
by SkinnyPB on Oct 13, 2009 12:35 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
they were planning on going the same route the Broncos are with Ayers, but then Merriman got hurt.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 1:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your site is admired, too
I’ve always loathed SD on principal, but after “scouting” all our opponent’s blogs this season, SD’s is the only one that has a level of discourse comparable to MHR; your membership sounds active, engaged, and thoughtful – as fun as it can be at a sports bar, capital letters and anonymous taunting just doesn’t go very far online, and ends in lethargy and disinterest.
I’m sure that, as with Mr. Bena on our (the good) side, you are setting the tone. Kudos.
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Oct 13, 2009 10:33 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I take a lot of pointers from John
MHR is one of, if not the, best NFL blogs on the internet.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:18 AM MDT up reply actions 4 recs
Thanks, John
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Oct 13, 2009 11:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Quick Draft Question...
Rumor has it that Denver’s War Room was hearing that the Chargers were set for Moreno and that is one reason we pulled the trigger on him at #12.
I know, water under the bridge, but any truth to that rumor?
Thanks for stopping by from one of the world’s most beautiful cities.
by topnation on Oct 13, 2009 11:25 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Hard to tell
AJ Smith is a dick that way. His trademark move is to bring in the players that the media says the Chargers should draft (like Moreno, Beanie Wells, Maualuga) and then he always picks somebody that the team has had no contact with.
So, yes Moreno came to San Diego and worked out for the Chargers and the media swore up and down he was headed to San Diego, but there’s a good chance AJ Smith’s heart was set on Larry English all along.
Honestly, I think they’re too protective of LT’s ego to draft a RB in the first round. Until after this season anyways.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Honestly, I think they’re too protective of LT’s ego..."
I had never really considered this side of team management before, but I was wondering if this was a recent thing with his injuries and rumors of being washed-up or if it was more to do with his play style and personality/figure.I was also going to ask, do you think this has improved his drive or ambition, or has it withheld the team to cater to one player’s ego, albeit a star? (I just realized the comparisons to you-know-who[but he’s not quite the star])
by RaRaDonk89 on Oct 14, 2009 4:47 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm confused
I’ll put the answer I think you’re looking for:
Tomlinson is washed up. Just look at the active leaders of rushing attempts…
1. Edgerrin James (31) – 3,019
2. LaDainian Tomlinson (30) – 2,677
3. Fred Taylor (33) – 2,473
4. Jamal Lewis (30) – 2,455
Would you trust any of those guys to be a “feature back” in the NFL today, when most teams have figured out that you need 2 RBs to have a good running game? It’s no wonder LT appears to be made of glass these days.
However, I think the team is scared of cutting LT, demoting him or having to play him when he inevitably signs with the Patriots. There are not many “stars” in the San Diego sports scene, and he’s up there with Tony Gwynn and Dan Fouts. That’s why they’re hesitant to move on, and it’s killing the team.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 6:45 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
When a guy is that good
and LT was unbelievably good in his prime, he becomes a security blanket. It’s hard to let that blanket go, even when everybody else can see it’s used up. That’s San Diego’s second error. The first error was riding him into the ground in the first place, milking him for all he was worth, rather than letting him share time with a lesser back and thus having him produce at a high level for a longer time.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Oct 14, 2009 12:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Honestly, a lot of it had to do with trying to feed LT the stats that he desired so much. I always looked at the Patriots, who would purposely milk an injury to someone like Maroney to keep him fresh for the playoffs, as an example of what to do. I used to try to convince everybody that the Turner should be the #1 RB and Tomlinson the #2, even though he’s more talented. Kindof the way the Titans used White/Johnson last season.
The simple fact is, every other team in the league has switched to a 2 back system. Even the best RB in the league (Peterson) splits carries. Even a pass-happy offense like the Broncos split carries. Yet the Chargers refuse to take carries away from LT because it’ll hurt his feelings. That’s why we’re left with the worst running game in the league currently.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 1:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with everything you just said
Except that Denver is a pass happy offense. We’ve had 165 passing attempts compared to 152 rushing attempts. Pretty balanced, not that pass happy at all.
People can use statistics to prove anything, 87% of all people know that.
by c_style on Oct 14, 2009 4:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
Even balanced offenses need 2 RBs.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 5:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
understandable misinterpretation
But I didn’t really want to open the washed-up can of worms. I wanted to know if LT’s ego was a thing they had been cradling since bringing him in or if it’s been a response to the harsh criticism from all outside of MSM on his downgrading play. I also was going to see if I could get you to warrant a guess on if this is necessary, and has this helped his confidence and running ability, or if it’s just made the team stagnant in drafts and FA when it comes to the RB cycle. Your answer cleared up some other cobwebs tho. Thanks for coming to answer all of our questions, and just ignore the people still complaining about one off-hand remark. I don’t care how you defend yourself, it was no big deal IMO, I’ve heard much worse Mcbashing.
by RaRaDonk89 on Oct 14, 2009 12:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LT’s ego is something that the team has been cradling since he became a star very early on in his career. It’s the only reason the Michael Turner was allowed to leave town and sign with the Falcons. It’s the reason the Chargers never draft a RB (they’re picked two in the late rounds of the past two drafts, and neither has made it to week 2 of the season). It’s the reason Turner never got a lot of carries, even when it was obvious how awesome he was.
LT likes stats. He’s a good guy and not an ego-maniac, but he wants to be remembered in the record books like Emmitt. LT wants the most yards, most catches by a RB and gets pissy when carries are taken away from him.
He, and the team coddling him, is the reason the Chargers don’t have any depth behind him and the reason he can’t make it through an entire game without getting injured.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 1:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sounds like he needed tough love
and didn’t get it.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Oct 14, 2009 1:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
read comment on 4-3 Defense above
feel for you with Turner and Rivera as coaches. You’re lucky you have what I consider one of the best QBs and by FAR the best deep ball passer……I still think V. Jackson is just riding Rivers…..a classic go someplace else for big money and do nothing player….good WR, but Rivers makes him great
What did you think of Smith firing Schottenheimer? (feel free to pass on this as its not time relevant)
If SD misses playoffs this year should Smith be fired as well? (I guess based on your comments about personnel talent and coach talent you have a love/hate feeling towards him?)
What would your Off/Def schemes focus on to beat the Denver Broncos this week? keeping player injuries/weaknesses in mind
by BideshiBronco on Oct 13, 2009 11:34 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t see how VJ could be riding Rivers coattails. The guy is a physical freak of nature. He’s 6’5", ridiculously strong and fast. Although I guess Jerry Porter and Javon Walker were also. Maybe you’re right.
What did you think of Smith firing Schottenheimer?
One of them had to go, and the team chose to stick with the Midas-touch GM who could be around for the next couple of decades instead of the 70+ year old coach who coached scared in the playoffs. It was the right move, and it was all Marty’s fault. The argument, in a nutshell, is that Marty wanted his son brought in as Offensive Coordinator after Cam Cameron left and AJ Smith didn’t want to do that. Neither guy was willing to back down and a decision had to be made.
If SD misses playoffs this year should Smith be fired as well?
I love AJ Smith. I really do. I love his philosophy and just about everything he does. I think this year he’s made some huge mistakes by leaving big holes (like SS and backup HB) wide open.
Yes I think AJ is fired if the Chargers miss the playoffs, but not because he’s done a bad job. On the contrary, he’s done a stellar job. I just think the Chargers will want to be able to offer the job to somebody like Shanahan or Cowher without them worrying about AJ Smith interfering all the time.
What would your Off/Def schemes focus on to beat the Denver Broncos this week? keeping player injuries/weaknesses in mind
Defense – Blitz. Over and over. On every play. Put two guys on Marshall (Jammer and a Safety) and blitz like crazy. We don’t stand a chance of beating the Denver offense straight-up, so we have to force bad plays and turnovers. BLITZ.
Offense – Establish the run if you can. Send Champ Bailey downfield after VJ and then work the middle with Gates and Naanee. Ball control.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 11:41 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like that idea...
Then we dump to Moreno/Gaffney/Stokely/Royal/ out in the flat for 20+ yards. Keep the blitzes coming and please double-team Marshall!
by topnation on Oct 13, 2009 12:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, Royal will be covered. I would glue Antoine Cason to him, put Cromartie on Stokely and then….I have no idea how to cover Gaffney. Maybe Weddle can take him. If we blitz 5 I think that leaves Burnett or Cooper to cover Moreno.
Man-coverage and blitzes on every play!
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 12:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope Rivera agrees with you
Cause if they do, we will eat the Chargers for breakfast with our screen game. It would be interesting to see someone try that on the Broncos…no one has yet.
"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV
by sadaraine on Oct 13, 2009 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blitz every play
And the Broncos will beat the Bolts by 50. McD will eat that scheme for breakfast.
by AllBroncsallday on Oct 13, 2009 4:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
shhhhhh guys dont tell him about........
Sheffler and Graham……hehehehehehehe..
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Oct 14, 2009 7:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What happened to DaBolts?
IT is, and it is impossible for IT not to be.
Parmenides (5th Century B. C. Greek)
by bradley on Oct 13, 2009 12:06 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Got a promotion or some deal. Real work takes him away from fake work. He’s still around. He’ll probably show up here at some point this week.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 12:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who has given up the sacks that Rivers has been taking this season? Will you be forced to leave Gates in to block? One of the ways we beat the Cowboys was that Flozell couldn’t handle Dumervil so they kept leaving Witten in for blocking support. I could see our D seeing that as a good option this week as well considering how dangerous Gates can be to a D. I am sure we will have to stay back a little because of Sproles and the screen game, is that the counter or do you think there would be something else?
My thought is that we play ball control… so far the Chargers have given up:
366 yards to Oakland [32 minutes vs 28 minutes]
289 yards to Dolphins [32 minutes to 27 — SD did get more yards total]
311 yards to Baltimore [ 28 minutes to 32 minutes [SDs favor]
497 yards to Pittsburgh [ 40 minutes to 20 minutes]
Coming off a bye week the people who had minor injuries for you all should be well rested and you should have a pretty good gameplan. I think part of the reason McDaniels brought out a different offense against the Patriots was a) to confuse them b) make SD rethink whatever they thought they learned in the week they could gameplan us.
A truth can only be expressed and enveloped in words if it is one-sided. Everything that is thought and expressed in words is one-sided, only half the truth; it all lacks totality, completeness, unity.
by Todd Jewell on Oct 13, 2009 12:42 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I also think he used the wildhorses to show off a little bit. It was kindof like a “Hey Bill, I didn’t forget when Miami shredded us last year” moment.
If McNeill needs help against Dumervil the Chargers will likely put Manumaleuna over their (backup TE/OT) and play with 2 TEs (with Gates sometimes playing in the slot). They can’t live without Gates out there catching passes and they know it.
Ball control has been a weakness of the Chargers this season because they can’t stop the run and seem to play a lot of soft zone coverage.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 1:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
John, what are the fans at BFTB thinking of...
the way AJ Smith called out the team in the press? Do they think he went to far…..and could it cause civil unrest inside the locker room? Also who (player) is the locker room glue that would keep that from happeneing?
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Oct 13, 2009 12:56 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
There’s all sorts of responses. My personal opinion is that AJ did it because Norv wouldn’t. I think it was a criticism of the coaching staff more than it was the players. Listen to how he complains about the Chargers not getting any better or making any progress. These are knocks on the coaching, and specifically on Ron Rivera. AJ was saying that Rivera is not doing much better than Ted Cottrell, and he’s right.
A player in the locker room who would keep civil unrest from happening? Combination of Tomlinson and Rivers. Those guys have so much respect and would never go against the coaching staff. I don’t think there’s a guy like that on the defensive side, unfortunately.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 1:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The chargers were very close to losing to the raidas who are one of the worst teams in the NFL.
Does that win give the chargers creedence of who they really are or was that just an off first game?
How are the chargers coping with the lose of TE Coach Clancy Barone and DL Coach Wayne Nunnely? Do you feel this is a direct affect of how the chargers defense has suffered in the first 4 games?
Now that we have a game managing type QB instead of the gunslinger type, how will the chargers defense handle Kyle and how many sacks do you project against him?
Do you believe Champ Bailey will handle Vince Jackson and if not please explain why?
Do you expect the chargers to win the division the way they are playing at this point and do you believe this game coming up will be the desiding factor of who are the Champs?
Thanks for dropping by and here’s to getting revenge for upping the score on Dec 28th 2008. 52 -21, thanks for the incentive factor, all the coaches have to do is make the whole team sit through that game. Thanks John.
by bfree2bronc on Oct 13, 2009 1:07 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Does that win give the chargers credence of who they really are or was that just an off first game?
Both. The Chargers are a poor first half team, and that showed. By the second half they were missing 2 offensive linemen and LT, so you got to see what kind of team they are in that shape as well. It was a combination of being caught off guard and then being too banged up to blow them away in the 2nd half.
How are the chargers coping with the lose of TE Coach Clancy Barone and DL Coach Wayne Nunnely? Do you feel this is a direct affect of how the chargers defense has suffered in the first 4 games?
The TE coach was let go because we brought back Rob Chudzinski, who helped to develop Gates. Nunnely is missed, but I doubt he would’ve been able to do much more with this patchwork defensive line. So no, I don’t think the loss of these guys has had a direct effect on the Chargers’ poor defense. Gates has been quite good this year, actually.
Now that we have a game managing type QB instead of the gunslinger type, how will the chargers defense handle Kyle and how many sacks do you project against him?
Considering the Chargers are averaging 1.5 sacks per game, and Denver’s offensive line is good, I’ll project 1 sack and hope for a lot more.
I hope the Chargers defense will handle Kyle by throwing a ton of blitzers at him. What I expect, unfortunately, is lots of zone coverage and 4 man rushes that give him all the time in the world to pick who he wants to throw to.
Do you believe Champ Bailey will handle Vince Jackson and if not please explain why?
Kindof. I think VJ will have a couple of catches for a couple yards, but I don’t think he’ll get any deep balls or big plays against Champ. He’s bigger and stronger than Champ, which gives him a slight advantage, but Champ plays bigger and is very physical. Honestly, I expect at least one Defensive PI call against Bailey in this game as he asserts himself against Jackson.
Do you expect the chargers to win the division the way they are playing at this point and do you believe this game coming up will be the deciding factor of who are the Champs?
Hahaha, the Chargers have been unable to stop anybody’s offense and have had to claw back just to win 50% of their games this season. Who would expect them to win the division like that?
Yes, this game is huge for the AFC West. If the Chargers lose to the Broncos, they’ll probably have to win out to win the division.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 13, 2009 1:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kyle's strength is his smarts and his knack for not making many mistakes or getting flustered
In my opinion, blitzing him is counter-productive to the blitzing team. He’s pretty good at seeing it in his pre-snap read then exploiting that weakness.
That’s a very bold prediction about Champ getting a PI call against him. I certainly respect the limb you went on, but I’ve got to disagree. Champ likes to play off the WR and bait the QB. I believe he is even more confident with that play style this year, as he trusts Dawk and Hill to be there for him if he makes-but-misses a play on the ball.
by elvisalex on Oct 13, 2009 1:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know that predicting a PI has anything to do with where he plays on the line of scrimmage. I think there will be a jump ball of sorts, and Bailey will get the PI. It may even be one of those situations where he causes the PI on purpose because the other option is a touchdown. Just a feeling.
Blitzing + press coverage then. Stay on the receivers and jam them at the line. Nobody is open unless Orton holds on to the ball for a few seconds.
For the record, I don’t know if the blitz would work. I just have more confidence in that gameplan then sitting back and trying to beat Orton with zone coverage.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 4:04 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see a problem with the idea of Blitz+press coverage......
No disrespect intended but….Who do you have that is big enough to press Marshall? They don’t call him the “Beast” for nothing……Marshall knows the play book now and has a grasp of the new offense, and is only getting better each week in the new system….sounds like a recipe for disaster to me…but that is just my opinion.
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Oct 14, 2009 7:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Quentin Jammer is the best “jammer” in the league at the line. He spends all week playing press on in Vincent Jackson, who is just as big as Marshall.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 15, 2009 3:13 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
How is SD usually coming off a bye week
Rest or Rust? Thanks for coming by to answer questions.
by phondonkey on Oct 13, 2009 1:36 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
2-0 under Turner, but last year’s win over the Chiefs was sloppy at best. I’ll go with rest, but the team really doesn’t look much different after bye weeks than they normally do.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 4:05 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doppelganger
Thank you for your insights and courtesy.
The oddsmakers give home teams an automatic 3 point advantage. Is your home turf that big an advantage to you?
by Endzone on Oct 13, 2009 2:22 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
In this game?
Yes. If only because there’s a definite 3 point swing when the Chargers aren’t playing in Denver.
Qualcomm, as crappy a place as it is, does provide at least some homefield advantage. Here’s the Chargers home record under Norv.
2009: 1-1
2008: 5-3
2007: 7-1
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 4:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
First of all, thanks for fielding questions
Just a couple more for ya:
1. Has Rivers gotten over being passed up for the pro-bowl last year (especially to JC, who really shouldn’t have gotten it)?
2. What do you guys hear about the impact Brian Dawkins has had on this defense?
Thanks!
by elwaytogo on Oct 13, 2009 2:25 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Let's not forget Favre made the pro-bowl
There’s a lifetime achievement award if I’ve ever seen one. Rivers should have gotten it over Favre any day.
by SkinnyPB on Oct 13, 2009 2:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Should've gotten it over Gutless oops I mean Cutler ;-)
I would hope you would support who we are. Not, who we are not. Coach Norman Dale "Hoosiers"
by dmitchell624 on Oct 13, 2009 4:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
1. Has Rivers gotten over being passed up for the pro-bowl last year (especially to JC, who really shouldn’t have gotten it)?
I don’t know that he ever cared and I don’t think he would’ve gone. Luckily, Rivers has no desire to be famous and no real desire to spend a week away from his family. He’s a homebody and a family man who just happens to work a job playing football.
2. What do you guys hear about the impact Brian Dawkins has had on this defense?
I live in Philly, so I was worried about this kindof impact. We know he’s a big hitter. We know he’s a smart player who is always in the right position. More than anything though, it has brought up the topic of “leadership” again. I, for one, think the Chargers regressed last year partly due to the losses of Lorenzo Neal (who was the unspoken leader of the offense) and Shawne Merriman (leader of the defense).
This year, Merriman doens’t seem to be as much of a leader because he wasn’t there last year and cannot lead by example with his play. The defensive leader was Jamal Williams, but now he’s out for the season. The defense looks lost and it needs somebody to speak up, grab the reins and take everyone to where this team can go. The problem is, nobody is standing up and leading in the way Dawkins has for the Broncos and it shows in the level of intensity for each defense.
In short, we should’ve signed Dawkins.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 4:13 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
hey john
u know i have great resept for sd just watch mon night its ok u are not a bevilie after mon night u will be begging for shanny back
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
by j-man on Oct 13, 2009 2:33 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Way to go, Broncos
You’ve turned j-man into a cocky, ass-kicking SOB.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 4:14 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
sorry john
if i was out of line i am not good at smack taik part of the reason is my dad gets me going called dener a fiuke i just am giddy that denver has won 5 games because gulling me belined in espn a littie before the season i am kind of like the lou hoitz of blogers
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
by j-man on Oct 14, 2009 5:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
A good sign of the broncos performance
is when j-man gets so excited he starts offending ppl LMAO. All the love j-man.
by RaRaDonk89 on Oct 14, 2009 5:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
by j-man on Oct 14, 2009 5:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
It was a compliment, j-man. Your team gives you the right to be a cocky, ass-kicking SOB. I know when the Chargers are good again, you’ll take whatever cockiness I’m sending your way. You weren’t out of line at all. Be loud and proud.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 6:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks
john u know i think u rule i am sure dabolts is a great guy but all i know is u and the kind thinks u have said about me means a lot to me about the who knows what will happhed i hope we get buck back soon moreno is deloning nicey but fumble too much for my taste for now this game will be hard whoever turn the over the least shouild win
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
by j-man on Oct 14, 2009 6:49 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
On Moreno's Fumble
Just a hunch, but with McD as coach, I don’t think that he can get away with that happening in the first half, I’m sure he got a talking to. Number 1, look at the halftime improvements the Broncos have shown on both sides of the ball, that probably doesn’t happen in low energy locker rooms(just a hunch). Secondly, I was very impressed with Moreno’s turnaround in that game. He came right back out and hit some critical runs, along with a 27 yard screen, and he was protecting the football a lot more when he was more than 5 yards from the sideline. I saw a young player with talent, learning quickly from his mistakes, and producing after a cooler. I’m all for the kid if we play him without Buck. Though Buckhalter IS a monster so it would be nice if he could play.
by RaRaDonk89 on Oct 14, 2009 7:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
i just worry too much at times
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
by j-man on Oct 14, 2009 8:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow…it must be a rivalry week because things are getting a little testy in here.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Oct 13, 2009 8:25 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
why? who are we playing this week?
lol jk
Bringing Bronco love from 1,112 miles away
by kentuckybronco on Oct 14, 2009 6:19 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
John, a question on the OL.
I don’t think I saw this one yet.
Can you give us a rundown of each of the OL positions and their strengths and weaknesses? I know you’ve had some injuries and some new guys are in.
Can you also give us a better idea of how well the pass protection is against a standard rush and how well they pick up a blitz? Rivers is a master at avoiding sacks and that has helped, but I have seen him pressured some.
Wherever you go, there you are.
by YosemiteSam on Oct 14, 2009 12:34 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Sure
LT Marcus McNeill – Has been bad this year. He has a broken pinky and apparently lost 15 lbs due to the flu at some point. He’s been made to look foolish by Joey Porter and Terrell Suggs, but did a decent job against James Harrison. Richard Seymour stole his lunch money.
McNeill has a high ceiling, as he showed with a Pro Bowl appearance in his rookie season, but needs to stay healthy and get more consistent. He could be great or terrible against Dumervil and there’s no way of knowing which he’ll be.
LG Kris Dielman – The perennial “rock” on the offensive line has been disappointing this season. I won’t mince words, Dielman looks fat and has played fat. Instead of holding blocks, he seems more eager to try to knock somebody off their feet so that he can relax for the rest of the play. This style of play has led to him literally throwing two pass-rushes right at Philip Rivers in the pocket. He needs to get better.
C Scott Mruczkowski – Don’t spell that name without lots of practice first. Mooch has been solid at Center, but the line misses Nick Hardwick (who called out the assignments). For the two games that Brandyn Dombrowski (our backup OT) was starting at RG, there was a lot of miscommunication and missed assignments between the two of them. That’s where you saw Rivers having to run for his life. Things are better now.
RG Louis Vasquez – A mountain of a man. Rookie from Texas Tech, who some believe can’t run-block because he never did in college. Considering how often the Chargers have been forced to pass, it hasn’t mattered thusfar. When Vasquez is in there, the line is MUCH better than when he’s not. Against Pittsburgh he sometimes blocked two people at once. Without him, the Chargers are screwed. With him, Rivers should be fine.
RT Jeromey Clary – Last year’s scapegoat, who I defended all season, has turned into the most consistent offensive lineman on the team. He allowed 2 sacks against the Raiders after Hardwick and Vasquez left the game, mostly because he was trying to block everybody instead of just his guy, and hasn’t allowed anyone past him since. If the Broncos are able to sack Rivers, it’s either coming against McNeill or up the middle.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 4:25 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
John, fantastic response on the OL. Can we get a follow-up analysis of the DL?
For some reason, I’ve had a harder time following the DL rotation this year.
by CoastalBronco on Oct 14, 2009 8:48 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
"For some reason"
I know the reason. The DL rotation has been a mess.
LDE Luis Castillo – He’s having his best year since 2006. He’s always been a beast, a unique mix of speed, strength, footwork and agility, but he’s had problems staying healthy. Lucky for the Chargers, he’s managed to stay healthy this season and has rightfully gotten double-teamed on every play since Jamal went down.
NT Travis Johnson/Ogemdi Nwagbuo/Vaughn Martin – A mess. Nwagbuo and Martin have great potential and flashes of greatness, but neither is very consistent. Nwagbuo had a great game against Miami and then got pushed around easily by Pittsburgh. Johnson should be the starter, with Williams on IR, but so far has played one half of preseason football for the Chargers.
RDE Jacques Cesaire/Alfonso Boone/Vaughn Martin – Probably even worse than the NT. This position is a total waste right now. Bingham was supposed to be the starter with Cesaire and Ian Scott as backup plans. Bingham was IR’d in the preseason, Cesaire missed the entire preseason/training camp with an injury he’s still fighting through and Ian Scott was cut because he couldn’t get healthy.
Boone is a FA signing that the Chiefs cut and who has never played in the 3-4 before. He’s looked….adequate at best. Cesaire has looked average, and has no business starting, when he’s actually been healthy enough to get on the field. Martin has a future here or at NT, but should not be on the field at this point in his career.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 9:39 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What is your take on Ian Scott?
Hillis/Moreno in '09
by Emmett Smith on Oct 14, 2009 12:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
He’s a C. An average DT. Perhaps undersized. He won’t wow anybody with power, speed or moves. Then again, he probably won’t get blown up and is about as consistent as you can get without being very good. Keep in mind, he’s another guy that has never played a regular season game in the 3-4.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 1:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
SD GM and coaches
John, what do you personally think of AJ, Norv, and Rivera? What is your take of the broader fanbase’s opinion of each (if you think it differs from your own)? If any or all are let go, who do you think the SD ownership (Spanos and Sons) would prefer as replacements?
by CoastalBronco on Oct 14, 2009 8:46 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
AJ Smith – One of the best GMs in football. That doesn’t mean he’s perfect, but he has pulled some fantastic trades (Eli for Rivers, Merriman and Kaeding) and some great drafts out of his hat. The owners trust him completely to run the team his way.
Norv Turner – Great offensive coordinator, not the best head coach. He’s not a player’s coach but he’s not a hard ass. He seems to keep a lot of distance between himself and the players, while still trying to be nice to them. It’s not even a “I’ll treat you like men” situation, it’s more like a “Run this locker room by yourself” situation. I think Norv is basically acting as the OC, but has the HC title (which was probably the plan when he was hired) and I don’t think it’s working.
Ron Rivera – I want to be patient with him. His heart is in the right place. I think he’d make for a great 4-3 coordinator and a really good HC of a team with a 4-3 defense. He reminds me of Mike Singletary in a lot of ways. I just think he’s lost/nervous about calling blitzes all the time because that’s not how it’s done in the 4-3. I think he’s also a good guy, and doesn’t want to blow a playcall that might eventually lose Norv the HC job. Either way, he’s coaching scared and the players know it. That’s never good.
The broader fanbase’s opinion is to hate all three of them. AJ because he’s too cocky, Norv because he doesn’t normally wear his emotions on his sleeve and Rivera because there’s no pressure on the QB. I don’t hate them. It’s a rough patch. They could all get through it. Unfortunately, with some great teams that never even made it to the Super Bowl, Chargers fans are very pessimistic about anything these days and ready to rebuild at a moment’s notice. It’s apparently more fun to watch a bad team get better than watch a good team try to be great.
I think if the Chargers miss the playoffs, they clean house. Rivera, Turner and AJ are all gone. A defensive, hard-nose coach who knows how to run the 3-4 is brought in. It could be Cowher, it could be Nolan. Either way, I think the guy selected will get to build fresh (like McD has). “Here’s a blank check, go sign the GM, coaching staff and players you want.”
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 9:49 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great takes on Norv being hired to be more of an OC than an HC and Rivera's possible discomfort with a 3-4
The Chargers did pretty well in the second half last year after Rivera was promoted to replace Cottrell. Injuries aside, this leads me to lay most of the responsibility for the Chargers current (pending?) demise at AJ’s desk, since it appears he’s assumed sole responsibility for evaluating and procuring talent since Marty left. Depth appears to be sorely lacking this year, which has been a significant strength in years past. AJ may be suffering from Shannahanitis, where too much power and decision-making resides in one office?
by CoastalBronco on Oct 14, 2009 10:28 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
How could too much power reside in his office? He’s the GM and nothing else.
The difference in the defense from the second half of last season to this season has to do with a couple of things, in my opinion. One, the defense from the second half of last season has tape on them and has been exposed. Two, a hobble Merriman and rookie English are not as good as Applewhite/Tucker were. Three, the Chargers were at their most desperate and blitzed without regard to what might happen in coverage and it worked.
The team is essentially the same from 2008, except they’ve lost their best player (Williams) and their defensive line is in shambles. As I said, the widespread injuries on the D line could not have been planned for. If this is AJ’s fault, it has more to do with his stubbornness with the SS position (leaving it as is when it was terrible) than whether or not he’s found depth.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 1:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re "Elite" team argument
Be patient. Regardless of you definition, we play all of those teams that are in the conversation about the top tier of the NFL. When all’s said and done, we’ll at least know what we’re made of.
by JohnElwayOverdrive on Oct 14, 2009 9:40 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Except for New Orleans.
I don’t think we’ll know about how the Broncos compare to them until they meet in teh Super Bowl.
by Dwhite on Oct 14, 2009 12:22 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
exactly Cheer. Sorry, didn't see your post when I replied somewhere in this thread. :)
Here’s for showing everyone the Broncos are one of the best teams in the NFL when it’s all said and done.
Blues. Cardinals. Broncos. Rockies (when not playing St. Louis!).
Drinkin' the orange kool-aid since the day McDaniels was hired.
Go DU hockey! Go Mammoth!
by HockeyHippie on Oct 14, 2009 12:44 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Atmosphere in Cali
May be beating a dead horse, but I think there is a nuanced change from the other questions about SD morale. I was wondering what the atmosphere over there was from the perspective of what’s causing optimism or despair for the upcoming game. When I peeked in on the raider site there was a lot of jeering about how they were going to crush the “evil” broncos, but as soon as intelligent conversation was initiated, there was a lot of questions regarding the legitimacy of this year’s broncos, but the confidence had left the room. Are fans in SD confident or dismal, and is it from denial/surrender or is it a fair evaluation in your opinion?
by RaRaDonk89 on Oct 14, 2009 4:18 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Dismal
If the Chargers were 100% healthy, even being 2-2, there’d be a lot more confidence. However, we’re smart enough to realize that our weaknesses (stopping the run, stopping short passes, running the ball) match up with Denver’s strengths.
The Chargers fans are hopeful, but scared. We want the young guys to step up and to win the game, because the season is practically over if they don’t. We want to see a strong defense and a balanced offense that can control the clock. The only way this happens is if a different Chargers team shows up for Week 6 than we’ve seen in Weeks 1-4, and we know that.
"I did not invent the wheel, I was the crooked spoke adjacent." - Aesop Rock
by John (obviousman) on Oct 14, 2009 6:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's too bad
I hope the chargers have a good season to bring the fans back into the game……I just hope it starts week 7.
by RaRaDonk89 on Oct 14, 2009 6:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




























