Horse Tracks 11/12/09 - Hochstein replaces Hamilton as starting LG; Broncos sign CB Moulton to PS after losing D.J. Johnson
Good Morning, MHR Friends! Just to clarify my standpoint on the Krieger/Legwold columns I challenge below - I'm not disagreeing with the premise that the Broncos need more big plays out of their passing game; of course they do. However, the way they went about trying to prove their point was sloppy and incomplete...
DB - Week 10 - Wed: McDaniels - Broncos TV
DB - A Little Perspective - Jim Saccomano
"You have to look at the whole picture, all the time. Very tough to do, but that’s the challenge."
DB - Forward Thinking - Gray Caldwell
"Four players appeared on the Broncos' injury report on Wednesday. Josh Barrett (hamstring), Ryan Harris (toe) and Brandon Marshall (back) did not participate in Wednesday's practice. Ryan McBean (knee) had limited participation in the session."
DB - Getting the Ground Game Going - Chris Gentilviso
"The Broncos announced the signing of cornerback Rashod Moulton on Wednesday to their practice squad. That roster spot became available once the New York Giants signed cornerback D.J. Johnson off the Broncos’ practice squad and onto their active roster on Wednesday."
DPP - Briefing: Hochstein new starter, ahead of Hamilton - Lindsay Jones
"Running back Peyton Hillis was back at Dove Valley after spending several days with his family in Arkansas. His grandmother, Margaret Ann Justice, died Friday." Our thoughts are with #22 and his family...
DPP - Law willing to put off retirement for a nickel - Jeff Legwold
LTC - Right Track: Despite setbacks, Broncos strong at season’s midpoint - Brian Howell
LTC - Broncos’ recent slide no cause to say season’s been scrambled - Brian Howell
CBS4 - 'Terrible Towel' Doesn't Sit Well With The Broncos - Matthew Buettner
"One thing I noticed when they were walking off the field they had a huge crowd of people on their side by their tunnel. That doesn't sit well with me," said DE Kenny Peterson.
DB - Week 10 - Wed: Orton - Broncos TV
DB - Week 10 - Wed: Dawkins - Broncos TV
DPP - Krieger: Deep ball high on Orton's wish list
"I don't have the coach's game film, but it didn't look to me as if Polamalu and Carter were playing 35 yards off the line of scrimmage very often. In fact, we can document where they were the three times they intercepted Orton:" What a bizarre bit of research. As I recall it, 1 if not 2 of Orton's INTs came under duress. So how, exactly was Orton supposed to throw deep on these plays where (according to Krieger not watching film but considering where the actual INTs took place) the safeties were supposedly playing up? I'm baffled...
Next up - "That might help explain why more than half of the Broncos' pass plays this season — 54.7 percent — have gone for 10 yards or fewer, according to a breakdown by my colleague Jeff Legwold." This is also puzzling. You can't measure pass plays for aggression by looking at their result. You have to look at how far the ball was thrown. To wit, Kyle Orton has thrown 191 of his 269 attempts (71%) 10 yards or shorter, relative to the LOS. In 2008, Jay Cutler threw 380 of his 616 attempts (62%) 10 yards or shorter. When considering those players' personalities and skill sets, combined with the systems they play(ed) in, these numbers make sense to me. If Josh McDaniels wanted to chuck it downfield all day, he would have kept Jay Cutler.
DPP - Q&A: Orton needs new bodyguard - Jeff Legwold
DP - Woody's Mailbag: Tickets a hot topic
DPP - Analysis: Few big plays in Broncos' passing game - Jeff Legwold
"Most teams consider "big plays" to be runs more than 10 yards and pass completions more than 20 yards. In their eight games the Broncos have had 11 pass completions go for 21 to 30 yards, one play between 31 and 40 yards and one play between 41 and 50 yards." Come on Legwold - this is such incomplete research - these numbers don't mean anything without comparing the Broncos to the rest of the league!!! (I'm not saying his point is incorrect; I don't know the answer because Legwold didn't provide the proper evidence to support his theory!)
DB - Tough Night Under the Lights - Mark Cooper
DPP - Broncos game a big draw - Dusty Saunders
DPP - Numbers: Opposites attract
CSG - Poor running game creates turmoil on offensive line - Frank Schwab
CSG - Orton shaves beard in effort to help break losing streak - Frank Schwab
DB - Steelers Postgame: Report - Broncos TV
Sorry, Friends - forgot to post this link yesterday...
AP - Broncos' Low-Risk Offense Stuck In Low Gear - Arnie Stapleton
KDVR - Denver Broncos vs. Washington Redskins Preview - Chris Tanaka
TW - Was the 6-0 Start Just an Illusion? - Carlos Cagin
AP - Shanahan Chosen For Colorado Hall Of Fame
Redskins News
WP - Battered Redskins dig further down depth chart - Rick Maese
WP - Portis called 'very, very doubtful' for Sunday - Jason Reid
WP - Zorn rules out LJ; Haynesworth says he was fined - Cindy Boren
WP - Bailey's return puts new focus on old deal - Barry Svriuga
AFC West News
ESPN - Midseason AFC West Report Card - Bill Williamson
SDUT - No dash for cash - Kevin Acee
SDUT - Vick brings alarming talent - Chris Jenkins
KCS - Raiders won't gloat over Johnson's departure from the Chiefs - Adam Teicher
KCS - Goff will miss remainder of season - Kent Babb
SFC - Without Larry Johnson, Chiefs minus star power - David White
OT - Raiders DB Chris Johnson: 8-0 second half is possible - Steve Corkran
WOW.
OT - Raiders lineman Matt Shaughnessy improves despite adversity - Steve Corkran
NFL News
NFL - Quinn back at QB for Browns in Monday night game vs. Ravens
NFL - Bills QB Edwards will start vs. Titans, but ailing T.O. might not
NFL - Bengals' Lewis nixes Ochocinco's plan to send mustard to Steelers
NFL - Kampman played with concussion but absolves Packers of blame
NFL - League suspends Eagles CB Hanson four games for using diuretic
NFL Opinion
NYT - Thursday Matchup: Bears at 49ers - Mike Tanier
NYT - Looking at NFL Network’s Lineup of Games - Toni Monkovic
NFL - Manning-Brady duel leads a solid Week 10 list of matchups - Gil Brandt
FH - Dirty Dozen: Are Pats, Colts NFL's Best? - Dave Goldberg
FH - Coach Killers, Week 9: Packers ST - Tom Mantzouranis
SI - Marvin Lewis won't allow Cincinnati Bengals to rest on success - Paul Daugherty
NFP - Tavern talk: Phillips still has lots to prove - Mike Lombardi
NFP - Diner morning news: Quinn needs playing time - Mike Lombardi
NFP - Where is the love for Big Ben? - Matt Bowen
NFP - Wednesday whys: A string of losses for NFL - Andrew Brandt
NFP - Vick win is another issue for owners - Jack Bechta
NFP - ‘For cause’ termination: Last refuge of scoundrels - Robert Boland
NFL - Ware the key to Cowboys' resurgent defense
FH - Introducing an Athlete of the Rarest Kind - Kevin Blackistone
NFP - NFP senior position rankings - Wes Bunting
Midseason Awards, etc.
PFW - AFC midseason team reports
"Fearless prediction: Despite their thrilling start, the Broncos will have to fight off a late surge from the Chargers for the AFC West title and will finish just one game better than San Diego before exiting the playoffs in the second round."
PFW - NFC midseason team reports
SN - NFL Midseason Report: New Orleans dominates players' first-half poll
1. Josh McDaniels, Broncos (44) "I just don't think anybody expected that outcome from the Broncos in the first half. He just seems like a blast to play for and a great game-planner who puts you in great situations." — Bengals QB Carson Palmer
SN - NFL Midseason Report: 99 players provide take on league after 8 games
"I don't think anyone expected (Dumervil) to have this many sacks. He's played extremely well for them this year. He's given their defense a real presence on the edge." — 49ers C Eric Heitmann
SN - NFL Midseason Report: Tackling five big questions - Clifton Brown, Dennis Dillon, Vinnie Iyer and Russ Lande
Brown and Iyer expect the Broncos to keep sliding.
SN - NFL Midseason Report: SN's All-Pro Team - Clifton Brown
Y! - Midseason awards: Favre dazzles, Browns fizzle - Charles Robinson
FOX - Week 10 Cheat Sheet: NFL picks and predictions - Peter Schrager
FOX - NFL midseason report card: AFC grades - Alex Marvez
FOX - NFL midseason report card: NFC grades - Alex Marvez
ESPN - John Clayton looks at the best games of the second half
NFL - Best free-agent moves also were the most understated
USAT - Insider: Analysts' MVP picks split Brees, Favre, Manning - Jim Corbett
0 recs |
110 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Thanks Doug!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Nov 12, 2009 6:12 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, Doug
Bummer about Hamilton, but even as sentimental as I am I could see it was time. Hochstein can’t play worse than Ben’s been playing.
Phyllis? Phyllis? Are you there? I can't hear you anymore.
by pubkeeper on Nov 12, 2009 6:44 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Doug
Real Power, comes with the realization that One cannot change the Moment;
only ones perception of it: Atitude! JQM
by UB3 on Nov 12, 2009 6:57 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, Doug.
"All by their heads, he places crowns."
by Tempestuous Binary on Nov 12, 2009 7:24 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
The 3 picks.
Orton’s 1st pick was a bit of bad luck because their NT pushed Moreno off his route and into the official. Moreno would have gotten him hands on that pass if not for running into the ref.
The 2nd pick was just an inaccurate pass that would have been picked off 10 times out of 10. All QBs make bad throws from time to time. It’s the guys that make more of them that are cause for worry (like Jake Delhomme).
The 3rd pick occurred in garbage time and is not worth evaluating. IMO, nothing (other than effort) is worth evaluating when looking at what transpires in garbage time.
This is my favorite website.
by McGeorge on Nov 12, 2009 7:24 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for clearing that up
Seeing the game in a bar, where I couldn’t go back and look at the play, I had assumed the first INT was the result of a defender popping up where Orton didn’t expect him (even though, in retrospect, that was a good place to expect a safety). I didn’t see a replay, and have been wondering what happened.
by Chibronx on Nov 12, 2009 7:52 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Bad luck played a much bigger role in Orton’s 1st pick than any other factor. It would have been a short completion if the ref and Moreno hadn’t collided. If anything, it was illegal contact or PI on the NT.
I wasn’t expecting a call. Those officials sucked.
This is my favorite website.
by McGeorge on Nov 12, 2009 8:39 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd have to look at a replay, but the first pick was the one I was most upset with
It appeared as if he had a receiver running a deep curl that was far more open than Moreno. I think Kyle’s worst throw of the night was when he got Buck laid out at the end of the game.
by legendarywalton on Nov 12, 2009 9:19 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
They needed 5 for a first down
Orton stepped up in the pocket, avoided pressure, and threw the ball to Moreno, who got picked by the ref after being bumped by the NT. Otherwise that’s a first down completion.
If somebody was open on a deep curl, I didnt see it (it’s possible); but Orton had Moreno for the first down, which would have kept the clock going. It’s a much higher percentage throw than a deep curl on 3rd and 5.
Listening to both McDaniels and Orton, I’d say that neither were very upset with the throw — though McD noted that on such throws you have to keep the ball low. That’s something they’ll work on — but from my vantage point, it looked like Orton was trying to hit Moreno in stride.
I saw (aside from the final interception) only 2 or 3 bad throws all night — and most of those were on pressures.
All that said: the game this week scares me more than any since the Cincy game. Washington’s pass D is very, very good — and our running game has really struggled.
If we can run, that’ll open up the pass and we win the game. If not, we lost 13-10.
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 10:07 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we will get the run game going
Wash is ranked 25th in the league on run D. Establish the run and then get some play action going off of that. I think we are going to take some serious frustrations from the last 2 weeks out on the Redskins.
We confide in our strength without boasting of it; we respect that of others, without fearing it. -Thomas Jefferson 1793
by c_style on Nov 12, 2009 4:53 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Orton had pressure on him when he made that pass. You can’t throw deep with defenders nearly on top of you. That is how QBs get stripped of the ball or Cutler throws into thriple coverage.
The 2nd INT was an awful awful throw. Orton had no pressure on him and just sailed a pass wide and high of Marshall that even the gigantic WR had no chance of getting his hands on. Orton missed that throw by a good 5 yards. That was his worst throw of the season. A pick 10 out of 10 times.
This is my favorite website.
by McGeorge on Nov 12, 2009 12:53 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Doug
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
by KaptainKirk on Nov 12, 2009 7:54 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Why the CONSTANT Defense of Kyle Orton?
Alright,
I read Horse Tracks every week and find most of the commentary very insightful and accurate untl it relates to Kyle Orton. I just can’t take it anymore. I don’t know if Orton has you on retainer to be his public defender or not….but c’mon man! Just because you run a website dedicated to Bronco glory does not mean you have to sugar-coat the QB situation. I love my drunken aunt, but just because she’s my aunt, doesn’t mean I overlook the vomit on the carpet. The offense is terrible and predictable. Not only that, it lacks power and passion. If you cannot clearly see that McDaniels has put the kid gloves on to protect Kyle then you are truly lost. Quarterbacking in the NFL is not about how well a guy throws it when everything is perfectly blocked….or the offense has the perfect play called….or the coverage is ideal for short throws….or the running game is churning…blah, blah, blah. A QB is defined by how he does under duress. When the blocking is good, Kyle is efficient. When he get’s pressure, or has to throw on the run HE FLAT OUT SUCKS. I don’t blame Kyle for being a coward, or un-athletic, but we need to acknowledge it and move on. Pressure makes some men crumble and other men focus….and Kyle is crumb-cake. If you want to be credible to your readers Mr. Writer, you can’t keep shoveling your B.S. to a fanbase that grew up watching the greatest improv QB in history work his magic for the better part of two decades. I don’t know how Simms would do as a starter in this offense, but his potential ceiling is much greater, and if we are yanking J.Williams, B.Hamilton, B.Kern without a second thought, why not Orton? The team will lose confidence in the coach if the QB continues to suck but the blame goes elsewhere.
by j_ledger2003@yahoo.com on Nov 12, 2009 9:09 AM MST reply actions 2 recs
unfortunately...
u are right. some qbs do well under pressure. cutler did well most off the time under pressure. not always, but most of the time. just not orton. def sucks under pressure. an int is an int. doesnt matter how you sugar coat it. a better qb wouldnt have made that throw.
now i would say the writings bad tho.
i dont know if its orton or mcdaniels but i have yet to really see a ball tossed downfield other than a couple over throws to marshall. but man it needs to be done more often. until its done our passing is gonna be predictable. (maybe we can get shanny as our off. coord) just kidding… but not really.
by s.west.railroader on Nov 12, 2009 9:34 AM MST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, but..
Shanny’s gone for good. I personally think it’s for the best.
by CaliBronco20 on Nov 12, 2009 9:50 AM MST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Luvd the guy but the team became stale with him. I am happy to see that we are headed int he right direction. Defense, miracle in my eyes after all of the non movement in the offseason and to have them playin the way they are is outstanding. They hung in there even this week (except for 3 long runs, which will hurt any time). I saw effort almost every play. From last year to this year is great. Our offense needs a kick start, Establish the run damn it, Knowshon needs to hit the hole and hit it hard. Its there but only for a split second and he has the skillz to do it. One thing I did notice about him in the last couple of games is that he doesn’t pop up after the play and run back to the huddle with that youthful enthusiasm he had early. BUT all is not lost brothers and sisters. I still have a good feeling we can bounce back. Washington came at a good time to get tuned for the stretch run. RUN IT DOWN THEIR THROATS BOYZ!!!!!!!!!!!
by TDavis for prez on Nov 12, 2009 3:47 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
JC is an enigma.
I was watching the Chicago game against Cincy and the color guy had an interesting stat— one that I didn’t even know they tracked. Anyway, the crosstabs indicated that JC’s QB rating is something like 20 points higher under duress. He makes more mistakes with a clean pocket, when his head interferes with his arm. I personally favor the athletically limited cerebral QB (like Tom Brady) or the pure athlete. The league seems to favor that also, if history is an indication.
by PredominantlyOrange on Nov 12, 2009 10:09 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Did You Read
The Player’s poll articles today? #1 underrated player = Kyle Orton; Biggest Surprise = Kyle Orton.
by Endzone on Nov 12, 2009 9:46 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd love to know...
just where above I am defending Kyle Orton. I thought I made it quite clear at the header that my issue was with how Krieger and Legwold went about proving their points. I did not take issue with what they were trying to prove…
Nowhere have I written that Kyle Orton is a great quarterback. If you’ve been paying attention, I have actually wondered here if the Broncos will re-sign him – part of me thinks Tom Brandstater will be the Broncos’ QB in 2010. However, the last two games were lost not by Kyle Orton, but by failings along the offensive line. That does not mean Orton has been without fault; but nobody has/will accuse him of being the type of player who can win without a respectable running game (which the Broncos have been without for these past two weeks).
FWIW, I do not run this website, I am not told what to write, and I do not make any money off of doing this.
formerly known around these parts as nycbroncosfan
by Douglas A. Lee on Nov 12, 2009 9:47 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
And I certainly agree...
that Kyle Orton is not an effective QB when on the move or under intense pressure. But why in the world does that have anything to do with the premise of those above articles (which say the Broncos should try to pass downfield more)?
formerly known around these parts as nycbroncosfan
by Douglas A. Lee on Nov 12, 2009 9:58 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
all i was saying...
was in reply to ledger that under pressure orton makes some mistakes. ala o line i suppose.
and to his predictability of the offense passing game. until we can get the ground game going and chuck it down field more oftwn they are gonna stay predictable.
i, by no means, said your defending orton (which i know ledger did).i was just replying to ledger and do not by far agree on everything he stated. i shouldve been clearer in my first post. sorry for misunderstanding.
by s.west.railroader on Nov 12, 2009 10:12 AM MST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
No worries, SWR
My replies were not directed at you. I understood what you wrote.
formerly known around these parts as nycbroncosfan
by Douglas A. Lee on Nov 12, 2009 10:16 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Hate to break up the love-fest.....
Alright Lee…..
Nobody is questioning your credentials as a not-for-profit humanitarian. I’m sure you recycle, drive a Prius, donate to “save the baby fur seals foundation”, and are a wonderful human being in general. I don’t mean to make this a personal attack.
Back to crumb-cake: you ask what this has to do with the discussion of passing downfield more? It takes nerve to stand in the pocket and a strong arm to effectively make the deep pass. The exception to this is obviously if you have a QB who is athletic enough to buy some extra time and get out of the pocket to set up second-routes with WR’s. Kyle has none of those attributes. All this talk of Denver needing to throw the deep ball more is nonsense if we don’t have the trigger-man.
And don’t get me started on the whole we need to run the ball more effectively to open up the passing game garbage. The concept is common sense, but McD has totally scrapped what is universally accepted as the most effective running scheme in the NFL over the last 10-years. How can we effectively run the ball if we are only using draw plays or shotgun traps? What happened to the zone-blocking landslide that produced multiple 1000-yd rushers from nothing? We still have Dennison and Turner to bust the plays out of mothballs…but are we so entrenched in this dink and dunk scheme that we can’t incorporate a little of it? So what if it was Shanahan’s creation?
My inquiry is that if we aren’t going to commit to the power run game to take pressure off Orton to allow him to be who he is, why don’t we go with the guy with the better tool kit and have McD pour all of his energy into him? I think McD could work with Simms to limit his mistakes (although he refused to do the same with Cutler). I would have loved to have McD hound Cutler relentlessly to improve as a QB. I think the result would have been spectacular just like Farve was when Holmgren was busting his chops.
by j_ledger2003@yahoo.com on Nov 12, 2009 3:50 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
With all due respect...
…your post reminds me a lot of the growing pains experienced in the transition to the Shannahan philosophy. He brought in players that were widely doubted— Eddie Mac and Rod Smith (Rod was already around but hadn’t been given much of a chance or a shot) come to mind (especially since they unseated proven guys like Anthony Miller and Mike Pritchard), and he had this wacky idea that he could build a running game with smurf offensive linemen and late round running backs. His ‘ineptitude’ was somewhat proven by his 8-8 start. I remember this, because I was one of the Shannahan detractors. His unconventional ideas split the grain of then conventional wisdom….and everybody knew that his way wasn’t the way you did business in the NFL. It wasn’t long before Dave Logan was screaming “Can you believe it!?!? They’re going to win this thing!!! You can go ahead and say it: The Broncos are world champs!!!!” I was very happy to be so wrong about the the doofus with stupid ideas.
So I get the sentimentality for what we are used to. The fact is, this is a new philosophy, and no matter how much we all rattle the cage for what we are accustomed to, this franchise is headed in a different direction and driven by a new way of thinking. I would have liked to see McD stick with the status quo in the running game— it certainly worked. But thats up to point where I realize that it doesn’t mesh with the direction he wants to go. He does not believe, for example, that the QB transcends the team and that the position is the alpha and the omega of a great offense. He likes cerebral, disciplined drop back passers that make solid decisions. Moving the QB or the pocket— which is a necessity when you have small offensive linemen— does not mesh with the type player he wants pulling the trigger. He passes to set up the run. He is not interested in forcing his will on a defense, but rather exploiting what the defense offers. I could go on and on…but it leads to to the same point.
Which is, in the words of Bill Parcells: “Stop kicking the dog, its already dead.” This isn’t Shanny ball anymore— this isn’t old school NFL thinking anymore— this is a different philosophy and as soon as ‘Bronco Country’ reaches a level of acceptance on that matter, its going to be very difficult and frustrating to enjoy your favorite team.
I say a 6-2 start should bring at least a level of optimism and patience. The kid seems to know at least a little bit about what he’s trying to do. I can’t wait to see what happens when all the personnel fit his philosophy, but I think its unrealistic to expect that to happen in one off season and half a regular season.
by PredominantlyOrange on Nov 12, 2009 5:00 PM MST up reply actions 2 recs
Nobody is questioning your credentials as a not-for-profit humanitarian. I’m sure you recycle, drive a Prius, donate to "save the baby fur seals foundation", and are a wonderful human being in general. I don’t mean to make this a personal attack.
If you truly didn’t, then why even post it at all? Surely you recognize, at least, how snidely this comes across?
As to the rest of your post, I’m with PO- Shanahan’s gone. I, as one long-time fan, am glad for that. I appreciate what the man did for the team, but the fact was that it was time to move on, and I’m glad we are.
by AllBroncsallday on Nov 12, 2009 5:11 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Quite obviously, Ledger...
You’re just looking to express your opinions (entitled) and have chosen to pick some sort of fight with me over it. Why? I have no idea. I’m not going to get into one with you. As I mentioned in my original post, and in my first response to you above, I don’t really think I was defending Kyle Orton or making a ton of excuses for him.
I was criticizing Legwold and Krieger for the sloppy manner in which they went about trying to make their points about the passing game. That’s it. Notice, that has nothing at all to do with Kyle Orton or what I think of him.
You’re welcome to share your feelings on Orton here. I just don’t know why you’re trying to get a rise out of me in doing so…
formerly known around these parts as nycbroncosfan
by Douglas A. Lee on Nov 12, 2009 7:10 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
for someone who 'doesn't' mean any disrespect
You achieved it pretty effortlessly.
Nobody is questioning your credentials as a not-for-profit humanitarian. I’m sure you recycle, drive a Prius, donate to "save the baby fur seals foundation", and are a wonderful human being in general. I don’t mean to make this a personal attack.
I understand that you’re new to MHR. Please take a moment and read the Rules of Conduct that you agreed to when you signed up. This isn’t within those rules.
All personal remarks are out of bounds. Period. Your views on the Broncos are welcome, but setting them up with personal snark isn’t. Thanks.
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 13, 2009 11:14 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
"If you cannot clearly see that McDaniels has put the kid gloves on to protect Kyle then you are truly lost."
Oh, to be one of the Enlightened ones! TEACH ME, OBI WAN!
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 10:09 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Potential ceiling ????
Chris Simms’ potential ceiling is “much greater”? Are you Phil Simms? Obviously, you have information that has slipped under the radar.
by Hank44 on Nov 12, 2009 10:10 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
j_ledger
You said,
A QB is defined by how he does under duress.
The team will lose confidence in the coach if the QB continues to suck but the blame goes elsewhere.
Interesting concepts. I always thought a QB is defined by how he performs overall, not just under duress. The great ones of today’s game (Brees, Manning, Brady) perform well and get rattled under duress. Roethlisberger is perhaps the best under duress given that he is sacked so often. And if the blame properly goes elsewhere, as it does with our team right now, then why would the team lose confidence in the coach because he does not stupidly think of changing the highly-rated high-performing most underrated biggest surprise of the season QB of a 6-2 team at midseason.
by Endzone on Nov 12, 2009 10:10 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Potential is a fancy french word for somebody who hasn't done anything yet....
Yes Endzone,
A QB is defined by how he performs under duress. It’s called being “clutch”. Look it up…it has nothing to do with a manual transmission. It’s what separates the Mark Bulgers of the world from the Tom Brady’s (both immoble, both have big numbers, only one registers as a top QB).
I’ll put it to you like this: If the heat is on and we have to produce an 80-yard two-minute drive to get a TD against a good defense, where would you rank Orton among the 32 starting QB’s in the NFL to bring you home?
As for you Hank44….yes, Simms has more potential in every way: size, speed, arm-strength and balls (look up Simms last game with Tampa for reference on his “set”). These factors are no guarantee he would do better than Orton. But since this is a re-building effort, and before we potentially commit to draft a QB next Spring, shouldn’t we find out what we have? Last time I saw Simms he was ripping it up pre-season.
by j_ledger2003@yahoo.com on Nov 12, 2009 4:00 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
A QB is defined by his ability to win
Orton has helmed several comebacks this season. When the Broncos are playing a complimentary game, he performs well.
The Patriots have one of the league’s best defenses, statistically speaking, and Orton put together a 90+ yard drive to tie the game, then put together an overtime drive to win it. The offensive line gave him a pocket, and he delivered.
Are there certain hypotheticals we could conjure where having Orton as the QB wouldn’t be one of our top 20 choices? Certainly. I can envision a number of scenarios where Michael Vick gives you the best chance to win.
But that doesn’t mean I’d want Vick as my QB — only that I’d like to work hard to avoid the kinds of situations in which his kind of skills are necessary in the first place.
And that is by putting together a team.
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 5:21 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
j_ledger??? Are you by chance, Jen Ledger from the band Skillet?
I just thought of that, seeing your name.
To your question, there has been lots of discussion on MHR lately about this. You can pretty much pick any article written this week and find something about it in the article or comments. It’s basically a “chicken or egg” situation. Is it the line not giving him time? The recievers not getting open? The running game not getting established which makes the team one dimensional? or is it orton? Or is it the two amazing defenses we played the last two weeks coming off of their bye?
There’s lots of variables here, so to peg it all on Orton is irresponsible.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 12, 2009 10:24 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
It baffles me that the Denver media just doesn't seem to understand the topic.
I mean, misguided opinions based in logic can be annoying. But these guys truly have no grasp of this system or the factors beyond the QB that affect it. I have to admit, I don’t read them, so I have to go by what I pick up here and at the other sites I utilize…but the fundamental lack of understanding they display is baffling to me. They have better access to resources than anybody that isn’t inside the league and they can’t pull all the strings together for the life of them. I guess they could be either playing Devil’s Advocate or dumbing it down— but a man willing to to shelve his pride and integrity for a paycheck is altogether a different kind of cat…a kind I can’t relate to.
by PredominantlyOrange on Nov 12, 2009 9:11 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Remember,
the media is in the business of selling newspapers/advertising, not providing competent coverage and analysis. One would hope that competent coverage and analysis would lead to selling newspapers, but it’s not as effective as lathering up the masses. If you spend a lot of time studying an issue closely, whether it be tax policy or offensive football philosophy, then watch the cable news analysis of the subject or read a Woody Paige column, and you’ll see this cynical phenomena. I refuse to think that people like Keith Olberman, Glen Beck, or Woody Paige are dumb, or fail to put the effort into researching what they are talking about, they just have to do what they have to do to get people to tune in. More often than not, it’s taking a disingenuous stance on something to get people fired up.
Oh, and those paychecks are really, really big. Not to justify it, far from it. I veiw these folks at the bottom of the barrel. It’s just not suprising to me that people in our society would go there.
by ButteBronco on Nov 12, 2009 9:25 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
…this idea that a bigger arm or more athleticism solves Denver’s offensive woes is pure ignorance. The ire, if deserved, should be directed at McD and not KO. If gold stars were to get handed out at Dove Valley, a Denver QB throwing away the ball or dumping in order to save it for a better situation would earn them. The disiplined player would get double stars. The QB who loses his head and forces balls into two-high safeties or unfavorable coverages would get his ass chewed and, if he consistently did it, he’d find the bench. Orton has flaws, but he’s doing what his boss wants him to do. The idea that Simms would be free to go all JC for us is absolutely ridiculous.
by PredominantlyOrange on Nov 12, 2009 9:39 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
It's the legacy of the Duke
I’ve found the last decade to be embarrassing. Around the Super Bowl years, fans and the local press were fairly sophisticated about line play, schemes, etc. They understood that a lot of play happened away from the ball. But the town has gradually been seized by a stupid, boring obsession with quarterbacks.
Remember when Brian Griese was run out of town, to great cheers, after 2002? The Broncos scored 392 points that year. They’ve only scored more (395) in one season since: 2005. The first two years of Jake, when we felt so great about the offense, were marked by lower scoring and higher turnovers. But hey, he looked good rolling out and we felt like he was money on broken plays, so most of us, including me, felt much, much better about the offense.
It’s gotten to the point where I want to defend Orton out of principle. He’s been lousy the last two games. You know who else has been lousy? The linemen and the running backs, who’ve stunk royally at blitz pick-up (especially you, Peyton Hillis). The idea that a quarterback should be evaluated on his ability to make $1.00 out of nickel when everyone else on the offense fails to do their jobs is Elway’s legacy for us. And I don’t think it’s any coincidence that Shanny’s reign went downhill when he pulled the plug on Plummer and started chasing that dream again. It’s a beautiful vision, it really is. The same goes for peace and goodwill among the earth’s citizens, 75 degrees around the clock, and perfectly charred/rare steak on your discount Sears stove at home. Beautiful, glorious dreams that just aren’t going to happen.
I want Brandstater to run this offense long-term. I have my problems with Orton. But good grief, people, there are no magic fixes. The broncos are swapping out the majority of their infrastructure on the fly, and all at once. The Steelers stop one out of three runs behind the line of scrimmage, everyone yells about the quarterback. Hillis misses his blitz pick-up, everyone yells about the quarterback. Ben Hamilton ages beyond his years, people yell about the deep ball. That’s the kind of garbage we’ve seen in Chicago for decades — a drooling obsession with a magical quarterback. Hey, they finally got one, and how’s that working out?
by Chibronx on Nov 12, 2009 9:33 AM MST up reply actions 11 recs
Agreed!
Orton helps us wins six games in a row with us, did what Jay Cutler could never do in beating the Chargers in San Diego. And now that we’ve lost two in a row due to our blocking up front, so many people are willing to drop him.. I’m sorry, but the Monday Night game against the Chargers showed me a lot.
by CaliBronco20 on Nov 12, 2009 9:40 AM MST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Orton can be just as good as Brady
I truly believe that. They are very similar QBs.
But he needs a line to give him a pocket and a running game to balance the attack out.
To my “eye test,” I thought he played VERY well the first half last week — and in fact, he (and Royal) were the two stars of the offense. But the Broncos can’t score points, and that falls to the QB — even though it has more to do with the failure of the gameplan, which relies on a certain kind of consistent execution, and which seems to fall apart when one of the components is seriously off.
Orton will never be great on the run throwing off his back foot — at least, until he gains a bit more confidence.
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 10:18 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Orton cannot be as good as Brady. That is outrageous.
I will never understand why some people won’t give Brady the credit he has earned. Brady was the QB on three Super Bowl winners and one loser. He also was the QB the best offensive in the NFL history during 2007. His team has been good to amazing every year he was the starting QB. It’s not lucky at this point.
Brady is one of the best QBs ever to play in the NFL. He has got the rings and stats to prove it.
Brady > Orton.
Don’t be a homer to the point of embarrassing. Sheesh.
This is my favorite website.
by McGeorge on Nov 12, 2009 1:20 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
There's nothing outrageous about it, McGeorge
And I give Brady all the credit in the world. He’s a great quarterback in the system he runs, just as Joe Montana was a great QB in the west coast offense.
What’s outrageous to me is people thinking a guy playing his 3rd full season — with his second team — has somehow peaked as a QB. There’s no reason Orton can’t run this offense the way Brady learned to run the NE offense. No reason at all.
Brady’s arm isn’t stronger than Orton’s. He’s no more mobile outside the pocket than Orton. What he has is better pocket presence, one of the games best deep threats, and an offensive line that consistently gives him a pocket from which to run the offense.
And he has mastered the offense he runs.
Tom Brady would be pedestrian in a system that asked him to throw rolling out all the time. He’s not that kind of QB.
In a system that asks him to read the defense, find the open man, and direct the team from within the pocket — a system that depends on a strong o-line — he is great.
In other words, Tom Brady’s skillset is being maximized by the system he plays.
Orton has that same skillset, albeit he is no where near as good as Brady moving within the pocket. But I think that comes with experience and familiarity with your offensive line. And Orton has only 8 games under his belt.
So, while you may disagree with me, you really shouldn’t worry for my embarrassment. I can take care of myself, and I’m not at all embarrassed making this argument.
Brady’s measurables coming out of Michigan were similar to Orton’s. He’s thrived because he is super competitive, is willing to work extra hard, and he found himself in the perfect system for his particular talents.
Put Orton in that same boat and he, too, will thrive, in my opinion — just as Matt Cassel did in his limited time at the helm of NE’s offense.
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 1:33 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
It's outrageous comparison
I’m not on board with the Orton bashing. He has exceeded my expectations by quite a bit. I’m much more disappointed in Moreno and the O-line.
But Tom Brady or Montana material Orton is not. Not even kind of close. Not even 100 miles close. Those two are Hall of Fame guys and Orton is maybe a Top 15 QB in today’s NFL.
Tom Brady and Montana would have been awesome on most NFL teams. Both were guys any GM would build a roster around. No more supercrack for you today.
This is my favorite website.
by McGeorge on Nov 12, 2009 2:53 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
It's no more outrageous
…than saying, in 2001, that Brady could be as good as Montana or even Bledsoe. I’m sure those kinds of pronouncements would have been met with similar responses to yours.
Listen, you’re entitled to your opinion. But I’ve laid out the skillsets and the reasons for my thinking. Your answer seems to be that Orton can’t ever be as good as Brady because he’s not yet as good as Brady’s been.
Which isn’t really an answer.
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 5:25 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Kyle Orton is in his 5th season, he turns 27 on Saturday. He is not a rookie, he is a vet.
If you are holding your breath hoping that Orton turns into a player as amazing as Tom Brady, you are going to die a young man.
But then again, Brady is one of the best NFL QBs of all time, a Hall of Famer. Most QBs are nowhere as good/talented/successful/incredible as Tom Brady. So I don’t really care that Orton is not even close to Brady as far as being an elite NFL player.
Orton makes the most of what he has and I appreciate him for that. We get more out of Orton for $950K than a lot of teams are getting out of their $7.5MM per season QBs.
This is my favorite website.
by McGeorge on Nov 12, 2009 7:25 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Nicely said on the Orton/Brady comment, McG
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 13, 2009 12:31 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
You haven’t laid out realty. Or considered history when you make these absurd comparisons.
Brady was amazing from day 1 as an NFL player. He has been an elite player throughout his entire career.
Orton has not been an elite player at any time in his five year career.
Brady had won a few Super Bowls by his fifth season.
What’s next. Comparing Moreno favorably with Emmitt Smith.
This is my favorite website.
by McGeorge on Nov 12, 2009 7:36 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Nah
He was terrible in his first game – as I recall, his first pass was an INT. But it certainly didn’t take long.
In addition to his physical skills, he’s an unbelievably hard worker. They had to give him his own key to the facility, because he arrived before the janitors in the am and was often there after them at night. It’s odd how the harder you work, the better things go. It’s almost like there’s a connection or something ;-)
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 13, 2009 12:33 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
ROFL
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
by KaptainKirk on Nov 13, 2009 2:49 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Orton can be just as good as Brady
And I am as good looking as Brad Pitt. Seriously, there are times where a reality check is warranted. And this is definitely one of them.
And with the 32nd pick in the 2009 NHL draft, the Red Wings select: Someone other than Ryan O'Reilly. LOL@Detoilet.
by Bob in Boulder on Nov 12, 2009 2:27 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
True ...
you aren’t as good looking as Brad Pitt … isn’t that what you meant? :)
by Hank44 on Nov 12, 2009 2:37 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
if you say so.
But tell me: at what does Brady excel that Orton can’t possibly excel as well?
Is movement in the pocket something that can’t be coached? Because that’s where Brady’s physical skills exceed Orton’s.
Or are there other instances? You tell me, BiB.
Otherwise, as I wrote in response to McGeorge’s incredulity, your response was likely similar in kind to those who back in 2001 that Brady could ever be as good as Montana — or even Bledsoe.
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 5:29 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Something that really bothers me is that our offensive skill players have not improved one iota this season. In fact, Hillis and Royal have noticeably regressed. I’d say Scheff has regressed as well. Marshall looks about the same, but he missed training camp so what does that say. Moreno has not improved. Not even a little bit. What the freak is up with that.
This is my favorite website.
by McGeorge on Nov 12, 2009 1:24 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
They are running a new system
With a new QB.
They haven’t regressed; they’re learning something new entirely.
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 1:34 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Then our guys are very slow learners.
This is my favorite website.
by McGeorge on Nov 12, 2009 2:55 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Why do you say that?
Everyone from NE keeps saying this offense takes several years to truly master. The Broncos offense has had 8 games.
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 5:30 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
It didn’t take Randy Moss or Welker long. They were awesome in year 1. Record setters actually.
This is my favorite website.
by McGeorge on Nov 12, 2009 7:27 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
McG – while I’m with you on the Brady/Orton disparity, Jeff has a key point here. Moss and Welker were plugged into a pre-existing offense – most importantly, one in which the QB was already well-versed.
The 2009 Broncos are not only learning a new scheme, many players are learning about each other still and their tendencies.
formerly known around these parts as nycbroncosfan
by Douglas A. Lee on Nov 12, 2009 7:51 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd comment, Doug
The lack of recognition that the Broncos are still early in a huge changeover amazes me.
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 13, 2009 12:34 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, with one exception: Brandon Marshall. For my money, he has been much better this year. He’s dropped fewer balls, catching 67% of passes thrown to him, vs. 57% last year. Even if you’re not statistically inclined, the eyes confirm the evidence. He’s been better in the red zone (On pace for 3 more TDs in a much less pass-happy and lower-scoring offense). No fumbles (vs. FOUR last year). And he’s really starting to use the system to his advantage. Fewer overall yards, sure, but the logic of the system says to spread the ball around. He’s a very efficient player within the system.
I’m as baffled by Hillis as anyone. I mean, why wouldn’t you send short passing plays in his direction, then see who’s strong enough to tackle him?
Royal has looked lost. But he’s shown improvement of late. And in general, he seems like a sound enough player that I’m willing to guess it takes some time to learn the new system.
by Chibronx on Nov 12, 2009 1:37 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Eight games in is a pretty big sample size in the NFL. The average NFL career is like 3 or 4 years. You don’t have years to learn a system in the NFL. These guys are professionals, not college players.
Randy Moss and Welker were awesome in year 1 as Pats.
If you don’t hit the ground running in the NFL, you don’t last long.
This is my favorite website.
by McGeorge on Nov 12, 2009 3:38 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Moss and Welker were awesome
Because the QB knew the system and had been running it before they got there.
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 5:31 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Or they were awesome because their QB is one of the best NFL QBs to ever play.
This is my favorite website.
by McGeorge on Nov 12, 2009 7:29 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Everybody knows
that the QB makes the Receiver. Just ask Cutler.
Ba da Bing!
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
by KaptainKirk on Nov 12, 2009 7:53 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Have they regressed?
Or are they not being utilized correctly? Even Moreno, the 12th pick in the draft, hasn’t set the world on fire. Does it also have to do with utilizing a blocking scheme, and other schemes, that don’t fit the skills we have?
I still think McD must be one heckuva coach to have started 6-0 and put together such a competitive team so quickly. However, we have yet to see too much of his offensive genius on display.
And with the 32nd pick in the 2009 NHL draft, the Red Wings select: Someone other than Ryan O'Reilly. LOL@Detoilet.
by Bob in Boulder on Nov 12, 2009 2:30 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
There goes the last of our mountain men..
Haha, Tom Nalen, now Hamilton.
by CaliBronco20 on Nov 12, 2009 9:44 AM MST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
There goes the last of our mountain men..
Haha, Tom Nalen. Now Hamilton.
by CaliBronco20 on Nov 12, 2009 9:45 AM MST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
I love this
After polling a few defensive coordinators in the NFL, the consensus is that the best percentage play when facing the Broncos is to play off of their receivers
So the solution for the DBs playing off receivers is to throw deep? Let me tell you a thing about spatial relationships here….
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on Nov 12, 2009 10:15 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Shhh
You’ll confuse Woody, and Davey, and all the armchair coaches over at the DP message boards who constantly repeat the proposition that we need to “stretch the field” in order to win — but who don’t really much understand or care how difficult it is to stretch the field when the defense isn’t honoring the run, and the offensive line is collapsing on the interior and you have a pocket passer at QB.
They’d rather you replace Orton with a guy who hasn’t played in 3 years (or a rookie) than address the problems on the line. After all, Simms and Brandstater can get the ball deep at will. We know that, because they did it in preseason — against vanilla defenses manned by bunch of second and third tier guys, many of whom are not even in the league any more.
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 10:23 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
This is exactly what I'm talking about above.
Teams are playing S’s two high and also showing off-man in the majority of looks. Therefore, one might conclude that they are very concerned about Denver stretching the field, which might indicate that the paid professionals are pretty sure that Kyle Orton is more than capable of making these types of plays. But of course Krieger seems to suggest that McD is inventing this safety and coverage stuff out of thin air…as if he’s a meathead that doesn’t understand that its all been caught on film…
It the old principle that you should never let facts interfere with a predisposed opinion.
So the only the way that Denver can logically stretch the field is to go to seven step drops so that our speed limited WR corps can magically become who they aren’t, while our undersized and overmatched interior (at least the last two weeks) will somehow become guy that can hold ground in protection…
I mean, it baffles the freakin’ mind….
by PredominantlyOrange on Nov 12, 2009 10:51 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Even Frank Schwab got confused
He claimed, “Poor running game creates turmoil on the Offensive Line” Actually, it’s the other way around. Complain all you want about the run game and I’ll agree with you. But when the O line can’t block, you aren’t going to gain yards.
I’m just curious – who are these magic men who create thousands of yards, rushing and passing, with no line or receivers? Last I saw, there are perhaps 2 QBs who even come close and we played on on Monday. Brady? live in his face and he can’t pass well – anyone remember a certain SB? Peyton Manning? Same thing. A couple of years back there were several injuries along his line and he struggled mightily when it happened. RBs? Walter Peyton, Barry Sanders and a few others, maybe. The rest of the known universe requires that NFL football be a team sport.
I was around for the Elway years, and yes, the obsession with Elway has actually gotten to the point where it’s embarrassing. John was achieving wonders with no protection? Horsefeathers. Elway struggled like heck, most seasons, until he got an Oline and a run game. Believing otherwise is complete revisionist history.
Look at 1992. Completion percentage 55.6%. Sack percentage 10.2%. QB rating 65.7. What happened to all those magic completions where he eluded all rushers to force victory? IT NEVER HAPPENED. If Orton has those kind of numbers, everyone will have written him off, terrible player, uh-huh, uh-huh…Except that he’s still leading the league in 4th Q QB rating, among other notables and his home win record is still the best in 3 decades.
Like most, I see lots of areas where Orton can improve. Unlike some, I don’t have blinders on. He’s not going to suddenly take over games, but even Elway did that much less than many of these posters would like us to believe. What’s even more embarrassing is that the forerunners of these same fans were calling for Elway’s head back them – I was there.
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 12, 2009 10:37 AM MST reply actions 1 recs
Bear... one thing I'll argue with you here is...
He was achieving wonders. Sure, he struggled stats-wise in all of those categories you listed… except for one very important one: wins.
But yes, there is a problem. The problem is that we were spoiled (as so many have stated). In so many cases back in the mid to late-80s we saw Elway struggling through 3 quarters, throwing picks, taking sacks, what have you. There were multiple reasons that can be attributed to that as we all know, potentially less than stellar line play, 3.0 ypc RBs, WR’s that no one outside of Denver fans can name, a coach who’s supposedly shackled Elway’s playmaking ability, and of course Elway himself.
But then we watched in amazement as in the 4th quarter this QB, this… deity (wink), essentially WILLED our team to win after win after win.
And that’s the problem! We got spoiled by all that winning and now every (and I mean EVERY) QB that comes through Denver, we hope, we pray, sometimes we expect him to be shades of Elway. I’ll freely admit, I have this problem from time to time. It’s part of the reason I was so enamored by Cutler… I thought that he had the best chance of “shades of Elway”.
Hi, my name’s Tunga, and I have a problem… I want another Elway.
So yes there is an obsession, but I argue that it is far from being unjustified and I don’t think it’s too embarrassing. The guy was simply amazing. If we want to blame anyone, we should blame Elway. Hehe…
by tunga77 on Nov 12, 2009 11:43 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
We all want another Elway
However that isn’t going to happen unless we can clone him.
2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
by weazel on Nov 12, 2009 11:47 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Right... don't worry, I'm working on that as we speak
I need a cloning machine for work anyways… =P
by tunga77 on Nov 12, 2009 11:48 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
On Elway
A few seasons that we love to forget:
4-6 (1983)
8-7 (88)
5-11 (90)
9-7 (93)
7-7 (94)
8-8) (95)
See? Sure, folks are going to jump up in arms and claim that it wasn’t his fault, but that’s the trap. At the time, many fans wanted Elway benched in favor of Gary Kubiak, Bubby Brister or other, lesser names that we’ve forgotten. The idea that you DON’T keep jumping from one player to another because you’ll never develop consistent play that way and because often the player who’s starting is really the best at his position on the team is comfortably ignored. That’s the snare that many of our fans are in.
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 12, 2009 1:11 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh sure, there were a few bad seasons sprinkled in with his 15 total
But what I was just trying to say is that it’s unfair to label some fans’ obsession with another Elway as being unreasonable or embarrassing. It’s not… it’s in my mind still perfectly understandable, even if we are a decade removed from #7 stepping off of Mile High for the last time.
And I can freely admit that I myself am still guilty of this from time to time… he was the greatest ever, it’s hard to let go.
FWIW, I was never one of the fans that ever called for Elway to be benched or traded. No matter the odds, I always felt like we had a chance to win with him under center (or guard even, lol).
by tunga77 on Nov 12, 2009 1:17 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not unreasonable to want to get rid of every QB who isn't Elway?
Uh, okay. But you and I have a very different idea about what IS reasonable, then.
Also, whether you want to admit it or not, by expecting the next Elway year in and year out you are actually diminishing Elway as a player — the underlying assumption every year being that there are other Elways out there, if only we can find them and plug them in to our offense.
Truth is, there aren’t many. Which is why Elway is always on the short list for greatest QBs of all time.
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 1:39 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Uh.... did I say that?
And I’m not saying this problem is a good thing… notice I said I’m guilty of this from time to time? I’m just saying it’s understandable that people can feel this way.
by tunga77 on Nov 12, 2009 2:02 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, you did say that
in so many words.
And I responded that it’s not understandable at all. What it is is predictable. Which isn’t the same thing.
by JeffG on Nov 12, 2009 5:33 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
No, what I asked was where did I say I wanted to run every QB out of town?
I’m definitely willing to give Orton a chance… I may not be the biggest fan of his and am concerned about certain limitations that I perceive him as having, but I have not ever said “bench the guy, put in Simms”. But this wasn’t even what I was saying…
All I am saying is that calling other fans’ penchant for wanting another great QB like Elway as embarrassing or unreasonable is a bit harsh. Be a little more understanding of your fellow Bronco fans, is all.
by tunga77 on Nov 13, 2009 9:46 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually it is unreasonable imo
Because there won’t ever BE “another Elway”, and as you say, it’s been 10 years already. Let it go, I say. Let the man be unique, as he should be.
by AllBroncsallday on Nov 12, 2009 5:21 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
It's interesting that we ...
… call players like Elway “one of a kind” and then look for another one.
by Hank44 on Nov 12, 2009 8:13 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
"That's MR.Styg..."
by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 12, 2009 8:37 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Guys, I'm merely saying...
it’s natural for some of us fans. Sure he was a once-in-a-lifetime QB, but that doesn’t preclude us from having hope against hope that we can strike gold twice in our lifetime.
Also, you don’t think Miami fans have been pining for another Marino since he retired, or that Steve Young didnt’ have doubters all the way up until he won that elusive SB?
Again, my point, was simply that calling these fans as embarrassing is a little harsh.
by tunga77 on Nov 13, 2009 9:51 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Ha, I am trying...
That’s why I made the joke as if I’m at a “AA” meeting for fans trying to get over Elway:
Hi, my name’s Tunga, and I have a problem… I want another Elway.
It’s a 12-step program from what I hear… 1 step per year… I’m almost there… almost there.
by tunga77 on Nov 13, 2009 9:47 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Cool
So, what’s step 2? lol
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 13, 2009 12:35 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not just a river in Egypt anymore, my friend
lol
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 13, 2009 4:14 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I just had to laugh when I saw this.
Ok, what in the world is he smoking? I mean really?
Cornerback Chris Johnson said the Raiders have a shot at running the table after a 2-6 start.
“If you really want to look at it, you can go 8-0 and you might end up 10-6,” Johnson said Wednesday. “There’s a possible way you can actually do it.”
Some things are possible, the Raiders going 8-0 in the second half isn’t one of them.
2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
by weazel on Nov 12, 2009 11:46 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
lol, well Seymour guaranteed the playoffs. So.........
I guess we have to believe them. Right?
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 12, 2009 11:47 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess those two were in the same room
2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
by weazel on Nov 12, 2009 11:49 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
probably. Honestly, I hold out about as much hope for the chiefs making the playoffs as I do for the raiders making the playoffs.
Unless that pigeon comes back. That is the Raiders’ secret weapon.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 12, 2009 11:56 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
the pigeon!
agreed! he was surely their lucky friend. He looked better than most of their coverage team.
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on Nov 12, 2009 12:34 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
So many rediculous statements in the league...
I think my all time favorite was by Roy Williams (I think), when he was on the Lions, where he said something along the lines of “we were so close to scoring 70 points, it was rediculous”… when in fact they scored something like 10 in a blowout loss.
by tunga77 on Nov 12, 2009 11:51 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
"Terrible Towel" article
Ok, I thought I was over this… but after reading that article, I’m back to being mad at our fans for letting so many Steeler fans get their grimy hands on our seats. =/
I’ve always thought Denver had the #1 fanbase of all of sports, but now I can see we’re a farcry from the Steeler fanbase’s rabidness.
I hope this article and more articles serves to light a fire under our fanbase’s collective arses to get to the game and support our team!!!!!
by tunga77 on Nov 12, 2009 11:47 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
No
The Broncos, Redskins and Steelers have longer sellout streaks than anyone in the League. The reason there are always a lot of Steelers fans at other games isn’t because they travel en masse, like Jon Gruden and Mike Tirico would have you believe, but because they move out of western Pennsylvania for less crappy locales—like, say, Denver. Same with Green Bay. I know a ton of Steeler fans who live here full-time, several of whom consider the Broncos their “second team.” Boo on that, I say, but there it is.
We’re just as “rabid” as any of them. There just aren’t as many of us.
by Remember Keith Kartz! on Nov 12, 2009 3:53 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent point
It’s the transplants- I know those folks too.
by AllBroncsallday on Nov 12, 2009 5:24 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
A lot of Denver fans are spread out
throughout the rocky mountains too. And of course there aren’t any other NFL teams in those environs for us to invade, to show how many of us there are.
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
"That's MR.Styg..."
by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 12, 2009 8:40 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Ha, I see... I did not know that.
I was basing my concept of Steeler fans traveling well due to have 2 close friends who are Steeler fans. They are absolutely nuts though and rabid. They go to insane lengths to get their hands on tickets… one of the guys has been to both SB’s, flying to Detroit and AZ with no game tickets. Then once there, paid an insane amount of money to get his hands on some scalped tickets.
He’s a great friend of mine, but boy is he crazy.
by tunga77 on Nov 13, 2009 10:05 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Bears v 49's
Here’s hoping for another Bears loss tonight! :-)
by Endzone on Nov 12, 2009 12:35 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Here's to Alex Smith and Crabtree having their breakout game!
"Take what you can. Give nothing back!"
by Colorado_Kitten on Nov 12, 2009 2:09 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Anytime any of us wants to worry about the Broncos OL
just watch the Bears’ or Niners’ and then you’ll feel better. ;-)
Btw that was weird that there was no sound for the announcers for the start of this game on NFLN. It was like being at the game, except without the drunks.
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Nov 12, 2009 6:44 PM MST reply actions 0 recs

by 






























