Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Raiders' GM Begins The Purge

Knowshon Moreno & The Tiki Barber Slip 'N Slide Index

Is Knowshon Moreno prone to fumbling?

This is a question I've been asked many times in the last several weeks.  Given that the Broncos invested the 12th overall pick in this year's draft on Moreno, it's an important question.  Moreno--barring injury--is going to be this franchise's primary running back for several years to come. You want this guy dropping jockstraps and jaws, not footballs.

So where does Moreno stack up?  Does he fumble more than the league average?  More than other rookies? More than other great Broncos running backs?

We can answer all of these questions with a handy little contraption called the Tiki Barber Slip 'N Slide Index.

Star-divide

Tiki Barber, for those that may not remember, was known as a fine running back for the New York Giants until his early retirement after the 2006 season.  But he was also known for a few other things.  First, he liked to criticize his former teammates and coaches--Eli Manning, specifically.    Second, the Giants won the Super Bowl the year after he left. Third, and most important for our purposes, Barber was well-known for having trouble holding onto the football.  In fact, his problems were so severe that during one 4-year stretch between 2000-2003, Barber put the ball on the ground 35 times. He was truly the Slip 'N Slide of NFL running backs.  So this Index is named in honor of him.

The Tiki Barber Slip 'N Slide Index is simply the number of fumbles as a percentage of total carries.  It's quite easy to follow. However, there are two things you´ll want to know about this index.  First, we use Fumbles as opposed to Fumbles Lost, because it's a better predictor of a tendency towards fumbling, since recovering fumbles is almost completely random.  And second, we are presenting the stat as a ratio instead of a number so that we can compare running backs with more carries to running backs with less.  Just as it's silly to say one quarterback has more touchdowns than another because they have more attempts, it's both incorrect and insidious to suggest another running back fumbles more often if they have more carries.   Thus, the stat has to be a ratio.

Let's walk through a simple example using the man himself, Tiki Barber:

Career Carries: 2,217

Career Fumbles: 53

Career Fumbles Lost: 22

Tiki Barber Slip 'N Slide Index:  2.39% (53/2,217)

Frequency: Every 42 carries

So Barber fumbled the ball in his career 2.39% of the time, or on average, every 42 times he carried the ball.  This may not seem like a lot, but it really is, as we will soon see.  Lucky for Barber, he fixed his fumbling problem late in his career.  During the bad four-year stretch mentioned earlier, this ratio was a whopping 3.64%.  This was every 27 carries.

Now we can perform the same calculation with Knowshon Moreno.  Keep in mind that this is a relatively small sample size, but it's not so small that we can't compare it to other running backs.  Again, this is the reason for the ratio.  Here is the up-to-date statistics for Moreno through Week 12.

Total Carries: 161

Total Fumbles: 4

Fumbles Lost: 4

Tiki Barber Slip 'N Slide Index: 2.48%

Frequency of Fumbles: 40 carries


League Averages

One way to judge Moreno is to compare him to the rest of the league.  Here are the league averages over the last two seasons, along with 2009 (through Week 11).  I restricted my analysis to those players with a minimum of 100 carries.  

4140422004_2530f77618_medium

The League Index varies between 1.16%  and 1.39%.  Given Moreno´s Index of 2.48%, we can reasonably conclude he´s turning the ball over more often than he should be--when judged against the league.


Rookie Averages

But don't all rookies struggle with the learning curve of the NFL?  The kinds of carries that they get in space during their college careers simply don't exist in the NFL.  Therefore, wouldn't it make sense that running backs fumble more often during their rookie season?  

We can answer that question as well.  Here are the Indexes for the rookie seasons of running backs with at least 100 carries from 2004 until 2009 (excluding Moreno,of course) :

4140134840_d0e3f7158c_medium

It appears that, on average, rookie running backs tend to fumble at the same rate as the rest of the running backs in the league.  Certainly, there are some interesting rookie exceptions like Darren McFadden, Adrian Peterson, and Beanie Wells, but most rookies seem to do a decent job.   From this list, we can maintain with confidence that Moreno has been fumbling at a rate higher than the average rookie.  However, there certainly have been rookies who have fumbled more in the past several years.

Lessons from Davis, Portis, and The Marine

Despite Moreno's numbers, one shouldn't be overly concerned.   That's because we are probably judging him a little too early. His current number of carries (161) averages out to approximately 14.6 carries per game.  If he keeps up this pace, he'll have 234 total carries for the season.  If he doesn't fumble during this time, his Index will drop from 2.48% to 1.71%. Even if Moreno fumbles once during this stretch, the Index will drop to 2.14%.  Neither is perfect, but manageable.

But more important than this is what we can learn from former successful Broncos running backs of the recent past.  Here are the TBSNS Indexes of the rookie seasons of Terrell Davis, Clinton Portis, and Mike Anderson when compared to their entire careers.

4139523777_5e0e0d007d_medium

For all three, their fumble stats tended to drop as they continued through their careers.  In fact, these Broncos greats aren't uncommon.  I found the same trend with others like Marshall Faulk, Edgerrin James, Brian Westbrook, Jamal Lewis, and Fred Taylor.  After their rookie seasons, they tended to fumble less often, eventually fumbling at rates closer to the league averages we've seen.  

So if we looked at Terrell Davis during his rookie year, we might say he had a tendency to fumble more often than he should. But by the end of his career, there was no such worry.  The same was true of Clinton Portis.  Mike Anderson didn't fumble as often as Davis and Portis, but the trend was still there.

In other words, Moreno has time to regress to the mean.  Or better.

And, like Barber, he's got coaching.   In Barber's case, Tom Coughlin taught him to hold the ball with his arm higher and tighter in a curl position.  This made his arm stronger and his fumbles disappeared almost overnight.  For Moreno, things aren't nearly as dramatic (he had no fumbling history in college), but if a problem does develop, it can be fixed by Bobby Turner and Josh McDaniels.

We all saw the other night against New York how special a runner Moreno can be (for a fine analysis of Moreno's yards/carry and comparisons to other backs, check out legendarywalton's excellent post here).  A runner like this doesn't come around every year.   And Russ Hochstein's knee won't be waiting for him after every goal-line run.

Go Broncos!!

Comment 123 comments  |  9 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'll give him a pass on the last two.

I agree, Hochstein’s knee won’t always be there(ha ha), but he did have both hands on the ball until the last moment. In that situation, I would expect him to stretch the ball out with no defender close enough to knock it away.

Also, who wouldn’t fumble when getting pasted by Ed Reed moving at warp speed?

by jayrockstone on Nov 28, 2009 9:41 AM MST reply actions  

Jay, agreed. One could argue as well that the Reed hit wasn't a fumble.

I think the reply disputes whether or not he had control. But it was ruled that way.

With that beard, Ed Reed looks like a freakin’ gladiator as well.

Thought experiment: What would happen if Ed Reed and Brian Dawkins ran into each other at warp speed? Would the world cease?

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 12:02 PM MST up reply actions  

nah the world wil be okay...

… we might get shifted to a different universe though, preferably one where the broncos haven’t lost a game in 10 years :)

by march20 on Nov 28, 2009 3:38 PM MST up reply actions  

There are some who believe that if this occurred, the Universe would cease to exist and would be replaced by something far more strange than it is now

There are others who think this has already occurred.

"I only know as much about myself as my mind can work out under its current conditions. And its current conditions are not good." -- Zaphod Beeblebrox

by Sharpe as a Tack on Nov 28, 2009 10:23 PM MST up reply actions  

It happened once millions of years ago

and the universe was created as a result. I heard Chuck Norris was also involved though.

by T.Dot_Bronco on Nov 28, 2009 11:48 PM MST up reply actions  

Thanks, Dude

These are good numbers. I know you said this above, but it’s worth reiterating that we’re dealing with a small sample size with Knowshon. He hasn’t carried the ball many times yet, and freak accidents like smacking Hochstein’s knee up his fumbling rate coincidentally. Over time, we should expect fewer outliers, not more.

It’s still worrying, though.

by Chibronx on Nov 28, 2009 9:47 AM MST reply actions  

Worry not!

Moreno will be a stud in this league.

by jayrockstone on Nov 28, 2009 10:00 AM MST up reply actions  

Bobby Turner will address it, I have no doubt.

"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.

by broncosmontana on Nov 28, 2009 10:54 AM MST up reply actions  

Chibronx, exactly, and thanks for pointing that out again.

I really appreciate your comments as a statistician. And if you ever have any ideas for stats pieces that you want me to do, please let me know. I’m saving the offseason for the “heavy lifting” of multi-variable regression and monte carlo simulations.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 11:59 AM MST up reply actions  

We should do the decomposition of the determinants of starting field position in the offseason. You know, do the Broncos have crappy field position because their defense forces 4th down in inconvenient places, because poor punt coverage, poor returns, poor prior punts and offensive stall-outs? I’m not a stats professional, but I’m happy to work on it with, or put the assignment in your inbox.

by Chibronx on Nov 28, 2009 1:53 PM MST up reply actions  

Great stuff TJ

I think he’ll be fine long term. He’s learning that there are things he got away with in college that just don’t work in the pros.

Thanks for putting this together.

"A great pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do" Walter Gagenot
"Hope sees the invisible, feels the intangible and achieves the impossible."

by bchiper on Nov 28, 2009 10:15 AM MST reply actions  

Thanks, bchiper.

I noticed he’s not doing as many spin moves at the middle of the line…save for last game:-), so I agree with this.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 12:00 PM MST up reply actions  

11 games...

One cruise missle strike, one fluke.

Maybe its just me, but I’m not exactly losing sleep over KM’s ball security issues.

by PredominantlyOrange on Nov 28, 2009 10:15 AM MST reply actions  

nope

Not when he’s being coached by the best RB coach in the NFL. He’ll be fine in the long term. It is a little eyebrow raising, though, to see how he’s falling on this index at present. It’s worth mentioning that Tiki was a helluva back, drops or not.

Nice job Dude!

"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.

by broncosmontana on Nov 28, 2009 10:31 AM MST up reply actions  

I'm actually much more nervous when Buckhalter has had the ball.

If a scale existed, his fumbles would most certainly be entrenched in the ‘simply can’t do’ category. He is scary when he tries to juke for extra yards, as he tends to forget that defenders are closing from the back side.

by PredominantlyOrange on Nov 28, 2009 10:34 AM MST up reply actions  

the math on Buckhalter

when using the stats at nfl.com:

Career Carries: 569
Career Fumbles: 11
Career Fumbles Lost: 7
Tiki Barber Slip ’N Slide Index: 1.93% (11/569)
Frequency: 52 carries

"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.

by broncosmontana on Nov 28, 2009 10:40 AM MST up reply actions  

Color me surprised

I guess I can breathe a little easier when he has the ball.

by Royal_Fan on Nov 28, 2009 10:43 AM MST up reply actions  

Just goes to show that my gut...

…doesn’t do math. Maybe I’ll calm down a little, but I sure didn’t like to see him returning kicks— and I’m more comfortable with KM wrapping up and head hunting over CB trying to stop and reverse field.

by PredominantlyOrange on Nov 28, 2009 1:10 PM MST up reply actions  

except wait

you’d have to account for receptions, as well, right?

Career Carries and Receptions: 678
Career Fumbles: 11
Career Fumbles Lost: 7
Tiki Barber Slip ’N Slide Index: 1.62% (11/678)
Frequency: 61 carries

Looks better. Suppose we should do the same for Knowshon and Tiki?

"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.

by broncosmontana on Nov 28, 2009 10:45 AM MST up reply actions  

So Knowshon would be ~2.26% (4/177), or every 44 carries, when also accounting for receptions.

Tiki would be %1.89 (53/2803) or every 53 carries.

Assuming that fumbles on receptions are part of the makeup of total fumbles?

"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.

by broncosmontana on Nov 28, 2009 10:52 AM MST up reply actions  

Montana, I should pay you as an assistant! :-) Thanks man!!!

Baby’s got backk……

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 11:57 AM MST up reply actions  

Even white boys have to shout. ^^

"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.

by broncosmontana on Nov 28, 2009 4:06 PM MST up reply actions  

Nice quote Montana!

When did you add that to your signature line? I was going to do it, but I procrastinated too long!

by ncm42 on Nov 28, 2009 12:06 PM MST up reply actions  

Thx, and feel free! There’s no exclusivity deal for proclaiming the truth of Josh MF McDaniels!

"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.

by broncosmontana on Nov 28, 2009 4:07 PM MST up reply actions  

besides

as Coach MF mentioned the other day, it’s not like Knowshon has a history of this prior to coming into the league. He just has to adjust for faster, harder hitting opponents than he saw when playing for Georgia.

"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.

by broncosmontana on Nov 28, 2009 10:33 AM MST up reply actions  

and faster, harder hitting knees from his OL. ; )

"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.

by broncosmontana on Nov 28, 2009 10:34 AM MST up reply actions  

It's not just you PO, I didn't make this point as bluntly as you, but I subtley suggest as much.

Great points.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 12:00 PM MST up reply actions  

I hope I didn't come across as antagonistic..

I think I get misread that way sometimes…even when I’m not.

I like your stuff, but I’m not yet of the crowd that thinks any trend can be discerned from any of our rookies…except Shuelter of course.

by PredominantlyOrange on Nov 28, 2009 1:20 PM MST up reply actions  

Oh, no way, PO, I really enjoy your comments

Trying to bring stats that are meaningful, or can at least point out some “markers” isn’t easy or perfect. I really do appreciate it. When I get comments, it helps me to incorporate them into the next piece.

I should have said, “I thought the way you put it was funnier!” I only mention Russ’s knee. Why didn’t I think of the “missile” line????!!! ha

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 1:24 PM MST up reply actions  

Better rookies fumble more?

Looking at the list of names, I’m liking a lot of the higher percentage fumblers more than the lower ones. Maybe this is just because they get a lot more yards after contact and have more people working to strip the ball. After all, Knowshon does lead the NFL rookies in yards.

by Royal_Fan on Nov 28, 2009 10:36 AM MST reply actions  

Royal...not totally certain, but on first blush

I would agree with this general statement. You have given me another idea for a piece. Looking at guys like Earl Campbell and Walter Payton., etc. Thank you very much!

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 11:57 AM MST up reply actions  

Just be careful about comparing the different eras

it’s almost impossible to compare any of the older backs because of rule changes and the increased size and athleticism of today’s players.

by legendarywalton on Nov 29, 2009 12:35 PM MST up reply actions  

Going for extra yards seems to lead to more fumbles.

Marshall is a good example. So is Buck. I’d still like to have that extra effort, but a little ball handling coaching wouldn’t hurt.

by jayrockstone on Nov 28, 2009 10:46 AM MST reply actions  

I'd agree with this.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 11:52 AM MST up reply actions  

Because turnover differential is the nmber one stat in winning his fumbles are a concern

There is no more important stat than turnovers. When you have a back you cannot trust to hold onto the ball it is a great problem. It will dramatically decrease his carries if he continues. It will also destroy his confidence at fighting for yardage and he will start to go down like a receiver avoiding the hit. Like Bill Parcels said, “I don’t have any guys that fumble on my team, If they fumble, they are on someone elses team”

by mauibroncofan on Nov 28, 2009 10:59 AM MST reply actions  

Good quote from Parcells.

I think that Parcells might have actually benched Moreno for a little while, given how Parcells handles things. I don’t agree with it, but I suspect he would have.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 11:51 AM MST up reply actions  

Thank you.

Great post. This makes me feel better. Go Broncos!

All Ready!

by precisiontint on Nov 28, 2009 11:04 AM MST reply actions  

thanks for taking the time to read it, precision

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 11:50 AM MST up reply actions  

Coming into the NFL is a dramatic change from college.

Stronger tacklers and a faster game. Knowshon will get better as he grows with the system. We have already seen improvement with him each week, and hopefully he doesn’t have a debilitating injury like TD had to end his career. Only time will tell if Knowshon will be as good as TD or even Mike Anderson. Let’s just hope he is as comparable to them.

by bfree2bronc on Nov 28, 2009 11:08 AM MST reply actions   1 recs

Thanks for this!

I have great hope and confidence that he will get this straightened out. I have to get something off my chest, though, and I hope I don’t sound too much like an ass…

I hear a lot of people giving Knowshon a pass for fumbles where he was hit by Ed Reed, or where Hochstein’s knee got in the way, etc. Not to be overly simplistic, but it’s a defensive player’s job to try and separate Knowshon from the ball. It’s Knowshon’s job to hold onto it. Granted, Reed made a big play, but it’s still on Knowshon for putting the ball on the ground. It’s that simple. I see it the same way with Hochstein’s knee. Granted, I only made it through HS ball, but one of the biggest rules of plays at the goal line…especially running plays…is that it’s going to be chaotic, there will be body parts everywhere, and ball security is priority 1.

I just think Knowshon is a pro, and giving him a pass for poor ball security does no good. I love the kid, and I hope he develops into the special back it looks like he can be. As long as Bobby Turner is his RB coach, I know his fumbling issue…and the occasional habit of dancing…will get straightened out.

by ncm42 on Nov 28, 2009 11:10 AM MST reply actions  

thanks, ncm, I know you were looking for the answer to the question

while “fumbling too much” is subjective, at least these numbers can help to get your hands around the problem.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 11:49 AM MST up reply actions  

Very thankful for this article!

In the last week +, I have been given a lot to chew on regarding the fumbling issue, and I also had enough of an introduction to the mystery that is QB rating to keep my tiny little brain spinning. How did I live before discovering MHR?!?!?

by ncm42 on Nov 28, 2009 11:59 AM MST up reply actions  

Another set of meaningless stats

The percentage of career fumbles does not give you a reasonable way to compare a veteran to a Rookie. This is pretty obvious when even within a single game it is misleading if the total number of carries vary widely. Imagine a running back with 4 carries who fumbles one of them. That is 25% fumbles. Now consider the back with 20 carries who fumbled four times. That’s only 20% fumbles. So which back would you consider more fumble prone?

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 11:32 AM MST reply actions  

Warmick, always nice to know you are lurking around the block

Everything you mention is said within this piece. I mention the small sample size, and it’s the reason I used 100+ carries, not 20. Moreover, I don’t mention anything about using a single game, so your last example is flawed, other than to try and paint the piece as an extreme example of something that I haven’t even suggested.

It’s a completely reasonable piece. It reflects both the trend of what happens at the league level with backs and rookie that have at least 100 carries. Further, it suggests that Moreno will indeed trend better over his career.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 11:48 AM MST up reply actions  

TJ Johnson

Everything you mention is said within this piece. I don’t mention anything about using a single game.

There’s a funny contradiction but you are faulting me for suggesting I’m trying to "paint the piece as an extreme example of something that I haven’t even suggested," and then you turn right around and do that to me but maybe that is unfair? Perhaps you recognized that I used the single game as an analogy to help illustrate why you can’t compare the stats from a long career to those of a player with limited data (hence my "This is pretty obvious WHEN EVEN WITHIN a single game…….."). But if so, why would you say "I don’t mention anything about using a single game"? This is a conflict of terms as muddy as some of these stats that do the exact opposite of what is the reason for justifying their use.

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 12:39 PM MST up reply actions  

Warmick, my response was a bit hasty and did contradict itself.

I should have rephrased it to say, “Most of what you mention here is pointed out in my piece, specifically, the sample size and the reason for using 100+ carries.” So I do apologize for this. I mean that I recognized the potential for a small sample size to skew data.

Clearly, the single game example that you bring up is a good example of why one wouldn’t want to get carried away with one game of analysis. I would suggest, however, that at 12 games and 100 carries, which is 5 times that of the 20 carry example, we can begin to clarify and get an understanding of the bigger picture. Could I have drawn that line at 150? Perhaps. 90? Maybe.

I strongly disagree with you, however, that this piece is meaningless. Just as if Jay Cutler throws 18 interceptions in 11 games, we would consider this a meaningful trend, I would say the same about fumbling.

So I suspect I will simply have to respectfully disagree with you on that premise.

Regarding the vet. vs. rookie comparison. I don’t think I claimed that I was comparing him to a veteran. In fact, I believe I was suggesting that judging a carrier only from the rookie year is hasty and that indeed, over the course of one’s career, they tended to fumble less often.

At any rate, it’s not my intention to fire off a hasty or contradictory reply, my friend.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 1:07 PM MST up reply actions  

You are always reasonable TJ Johnson

and certainly always interesting. The disparity between two players having respectively 4 and 20 carries in a single game is directly comparative to two players having played half a season and 2-1/2 year (except, of course, for the fact that the longer a career the more has been learned and the less statistically significant is the impact of the veterans rookie mistakes). As such, my analogy to Moreno vs. an experienced veteran would have been even more illustrative if I had compared 1 carry to 20.

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 1:32 PM MST up reply actions  

Warmick, I think we are finding some common ground here.

Regarding stats in general, I imagine that we have more in common about how they are used than these exchanges would suggest. Individual football plays are so complex, and their are so many variables (some that we may not even be aware of like whether a guy has a pinched nerve and that’s why he missed his block), that it’s never easy to be a “stats guy.”

Yes, I agree about the statistical significance going up as carries go up.

We will certainly learn more about Moreno when he has 600 carries. My attempt at suggesting that we don’t judge him too quickly as we look at guys like Davis (rookie vs. career) is my—perhaps too subtle way—of saying as much.

I would still say that even though Jay Cutler hasn’t had a larger amount of passes, as say, someone who is a ten year vet, we can at least take a stab at the general idea that he throws too many INTs. I’m attempting to do the same here.

Still getting used to your style, Warmick. On my next post, I’ll be bringing out a “Gunslinger’s Index.” Please check it out and get after it. We can have a great exchange about QBs. I really look forward to it, mate.

Off to do some X-mas shopping. Now that’s a stat that lies to me constantly.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 1:52 PM MST up reply actions  

Common ground to be sure

When it comes to Cutler I’m of the mindset: To hell with the stats. Any criticism is justified. :o)

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 1:58 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Having you guys vetting each others arguments

makes me supremely confident in what we’re reading at MHR. Thanks for your efforts, gentlemen!

"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.

by broncosmontana on Nov 28, 2009 4:18 PM MST up reply actions  

sorry, ¨there" instead of "their" ...I swear I´m no reflection of my public education:-)

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 2:01 PM MST up reply actions  

You read enough blogs

the distinction gets blurred :)

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 2:09 PM MST up reply actions  

I think the larger the sample size the more solid the argument is.

I’d discard any argument that came out touting single games or tiny tiny sample sizes,…

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The guy formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 28, 2009 3:14 PM MST up reply actions  

You are making the same mistake as many others

I hate having to explain what ought to have been perceived as obvious but here you go: Don’t get hung up on the single game thing. That was merely the scenario used to set up the argument the gist of which was: In the hypothetical example given it would be reasonable to suspect the player with 20% fumbles is more fumble prone than the player with 25% fumbles. In other words, looking at the stats only leads you to the very opposite conclusion than what is warranted.

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 4:07 PM MST up reply actions  

So how would you quantify the issue, warmick?

You know, in a way that isn’t meaningless.

It seems TJ went to great lengths to explain the use of the ratio of fumbles to carries. I don’t see a better way of getting all of the players into the discussion when the number of carries varies as much as it does. Also, it obviously depends on the sample size here, specifically in terms of time. All of which was addressed by the OP.

Poking holes in things is easy. Offering meaningful contributions is more difficult.

- Jason

I gather speed by you f***ing with me - EV

by jubei on Nov 28, 2009 11:51 AM MST up reply actions  

Here is how I would have answered my own question Jubei:

The guy with four fumbles does seem to be fumble prone. Regarding the player with one fumble, there just isn’t enough data to say one way or the other. As to your

Poking holes in things is easy. Offering meaningful contributions is more difficult.

I can only say that your own post is a good example. If that is true, however, then yours is indeed a successful contribution in which case calling it "a good example" does not hold true. The dichotomy between these options just makes one’s head spin.

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 12:44 PM MST up reply actions  

Speaking of meaningless...

What was your point? That we shouldn’t do a stats analysis of fumbling or that no statistical form is perfect? Since Knowshon has had 11 games, the point regarding a single game doesn’t apply. Anyone who fumbles 4 times in a single game has major problems unless he doesn’t fumble in others. If the second applies, then the stats will reflect that, just as TJ has shown.

I’m fine with a rational argument regarding how helpful a particular stat is, but this seems like knee-jerk snark.

Moreno/Buckhalter in '09

by Doc Bear on Nov 28, 2009 12:05 PM MST up reply actions  

Talking about knee-jerk snark

The purpose for using stats is that the broad picture will help you see the overall picture in a clarifying light. When a stat implies unreasonable or even false deductions, then they are not only without value but actually harmful i.e. doing the exact opposite of what is the reason for using them in the first place. Sometimes not bringing up comparisons is more helpful than bringing up comparisons that are misleading.

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 12:51 PM MST up reply actions  

Sorry, but I'm not buying it

This isn’t the first time you’ve come onto one of TJ’s posts with a rude comment. Coming up with a far-from-realty example like the one you cited has little or nothing to do with the value of TJ’s post. You opened up this can of worms with the way you started your first comment:

Another set of meaningless stats

There’s no respectful disagreement there, just another rude statement. The fact that you can twist an extreme example that has nothing to do with the analysis that was done here has not bearing. If you want a civil, rational debate, this isn’t the way to achieve it.

Moreno/Buckhalter in '09

by Doc Bear on Nov 28, 2009 1:10 PM MST up reply actions  

Another set of meaningless stats

is an opinion. I could have said “Another set of meaningless stats IMO.” Would that have alleviated the impact or should I have gone all out with something like “I am not convinced these stats paint the full picture.”?

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 1:16 PM MST up reply actions  

I respectfully disagree

with your opinion that the game of basketball has any merits whatsoever but it appears a forceful opinion is the more likely to solicit a response.

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 3:36 PM MST up reply actions  

I'll give you that.

I’ve noticed the simple phrase ‘IMO’ alleviates a lot of tension around here. Yet I’m always left wondering: Who’s else would it be? Do people think I’m so arrogant as to confuse my layman’s interpretations with fact?

I generally like MHR, but what you gain from avoiding brain dead trolls, you pay back by dealing with hypersensitivity and a healthy dose of political correctness. When it comes down to it, we are talking about a game, not hammering out the scales of justice or some other similarly righteous pursuit. This is a fan site, not an academia think tank. Our passions, at the end of the day, are largely meaningless— which is actually a large part of the appeal to me. I’d rather save the anger and bruised egos for the stuff that really matters in my life.

…but that’s just IMO.

by PredominantlyOrange on Nov 28, 2009 4:28 PM MST up reply actions  

PO, You are warmick and anyone else are welcome to withold IMO are preface to your comments

I’ll keep on chucking the ball to be sure.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 5:16 PM MST up reply actions  

I'm happy to be as respectful as the community prefers...

I’ll take this environment over pretty much any fan forum out there.

I’ve just noticed that I (and some others) have the tendency to offend when I never have the slightest intention to do so. I can’t speak to anybody else motive or intent, but sometimes I find myself wishing I’d applied an extra filter or just kept my mouth shut all together. What I think of a certain player of situation is never intended to disrespect an article a comment or the author behind it.

by PredominantlyOrange on Nov 28, 2009 6:00 PM MST up reply actions  

In otherwords...

…it can be tricky proposition to disagree with somebody. You don’t word it just perfect, and add all the appropriate qualifiers, then you’re calling out the person or somebody the person likes and not the idea.

I wasn’t thinking of you at all, T.J.— in fact nobody in particular. Its more of a general observation.

by PredominantlyOrange on Nov 28, 2009 6:05 PM MST up reply actions  

I can't seem to spell today in my replies:-), but one thing about the wrriten word

is that it’s hard to apply context….I’ve never thought you had that tendency in your posts at all…even warmick explained to me in another post his style of disagreement…If I ever get a thin skin, just say, “Duuuuuude. It’s not nam.” That will take care of it for me!

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 6:25 PM MST up reply actions  

Colinski, good point on Buckhalter

Although I agree with your general point regarding his performance being overshadowed by the fumble, the fumbling was worth exploring, if nothing else, to point out that it should not be a concern going forward.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 5:21 PM MST up reply actions  

because we can't get

a sense of context here, we can’t see your face or hear the inflection of your voice.
example: Hey, (upper lilt in voice) Nice haircut! Or Hey, (snarling lip curve) Nice haircut! (snicker)

So since you can’t give verbal or physical “intent”, we, as your readers rely on a bit more text to get our inferences from you.

May I just add that I think to statistitians debating a statistical post is only mildly interesting. I found the article to be very interesting. Warmick, your original comment came off as rude to me and the follow up posts could have been ended much earlier, before this decended to a whose right debate.
Read my sig……

Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.

by Sean in Pa. on Nov 29, 2009 4:24 AM MST up reply actions  

context is everything

so I agree folks should take care that their comments aren’t read as being rude, etc. when not intended. Its something I ned to keep in mind at times as well. That said, I also interpreted Warmick’s original post as kind of rude and condescending, which obscured some of his very valid points re-affirming TJ’s points about sample size, etc.

Continung with the “context is everything” theme, I too am much more worried about C-Buck’s ball security than I am about Knowshon’s. Knowshown typically has the ball tucked high and tight, unless its a crazy fluke like Hoch’s knee where he was reaching for the goal-line. C-Buck’s fumbles often seem to be when he gets loose in the open-field and is trying to make a move, where he gets sloppy with his technqiue and the backside pursuit takes advantage of him…. much less forgiveable in my opinion, and over time, I think will result in in a comparatively greater ratio of fumbles than Knowshon’s good technique.

by cjfarls on Nov 29, 2009 11:08 AM MST up reply actions  

I’m not here to make friends

I’m not here to create animosity either. Rather, my purpose is the same as what I would expect from everybody else: To express my opinion to the extent that I think it worthwhile for others to contemplate. You are right that blogging has inherent restrictions because of the lack of intonations, expressions and body language. It does, however, also offer you liberties beyond what you enjoy in your daily life. If we met, I might indeed think you have an ugly haircut but I probably would not tell you so. Here, on the other hand, I can tell you if I think you have an "ugly" opinion without worrying about whether you end up not liking that duck guy with the weird name. So yes, blogging is limiting in many ways but it also offers you an opportunity to express an opinion you might not be quite as honest about in a social setting.

by warmick on Nov 29, 2009 1:23 PM MST up reply actions  

agreed

However.

The same freedom to express your opinions also leads to a cliff. It is easy to fall off of in the name of expression.

Opinions are varied. each is valid.. it is a slippery slope and filled with danger.

Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.

by Sean in Pa. on Nov 29, 2009 2:39 PM MST up reply actions  

why are'nt you

here to make friends?
I can’t say that I am but I am not against it. Let us make friends, you and me… Let’s be friends :-) Why not?

Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.

by Sean in Pa. on Nov 29, 2009 4:15 PM MST up reply actions  

where does

TJ cite a back with four or 20 carries on this post? While not ideal (ideal statistical analysis would be pointless anyways…well, if we already knew the answer, why would we need statistics to predict it?), I think TJ does a sufficient job of putting a lower bound on the number of carries while still being able to compare Knowshon’s numbers so far to other rookies.

He also pointed out how fast this percentage can fluctuate if Moreno goes on a “fumbleless” streak, the converse being how it could also balloon if he puts a few more on the ground. Your argument here has no bearing on dude’s analysis, because no such players would be included therein.

by poorboywilly on Nov 28, 2009 12:06 PM MST up reply actions  

As you can see above Poorboywilly

The 20 vs. 4 carries example is entirely mine. Your post provides a great example though on the pitfalls inherent in misinterpreting the available information as presented.

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 12:57 PM MST up reply actions  

Obfuscation,

thy name is Warmick.

Several times the point has been made that your contention is immaterial since the data and the methodology prevent the very problems you bring up.

Yet, your only response is to project misinterpretation into the part of the respondent.

If your point has been misconstrued, then please clarify. Constantly saying, “nobody understands me” doesn’t help the situation.

by Ace O'Dale on Nov 28, 2009 1:03 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

I wouldn't say

“nobody understands me.” I might be tempted to say “nobody understands you” but that may be statistically incorrect. I can say with conviction, however, “I don’t understand you.” Hence, I can’t respond to your post. Then again, I just did. Confusing, isn’t it?

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 1:10 PM MST up reply actions  

Confusing, isn’t it?

That appears to be your intent…

by Ace O'Dale on Nov 28, 2009 1:13 PM MST up reply actions  

Oh, I'd say most understand

Exactly what you’re trying to accomplish.

by AllBroncsallday on Nov 28, 2009 3:45 PM MST up reply actions  

Thank you AllBroncsallday

Your support is greatly appreciated. My only (small) issue is with your use of the words "trying to." They imply a struggle while the reality is that I manage to express just about exactly what I wish to convey.

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 3:53 PM MST up reply actions  

Stirrin' the pot

It’s all good, just as long everybody remembers to be respectful. Just sayin’

by AllBroncsallday on Nov 28, 2009 11:03 PM MST up reply actions  

I think I’m interpreting just fine. Again, I ask, does TJ cite any backs like those you’ve asked us to imagine? No, in fact he explicitly rules them out of his analysis, and thus the question you pose has no applicability to the original post. You’ve provided a nice “straw man” argument by showing two players with an insignificant number of carries in the context of TJs statistics.

by poorboywilly on Nov 28, 2009 7:21 PM MST up reply actions  

Do you know what an analogy is?

Since you have now asked twice I shall (respect that enough to) give you an answer. No, Tj has said nothing like what I said. That is precisely why I said it. If all I was going to do was repeat what he had already said, I would not have bothered.

by warmick on Nov 28, 2009 9:57 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes, I know what an analogy is. Perhaps you don’t know what I am getting at, thus I will be less subtle. Is 20 or four greater than or equal to 100? No. Did TJ put a lower limit of 100 on the carries in his analysis? Yes.

As I have said three times now, since the players in your analogy do not fit the limits of TJs statistics, they are pointless for discussion of its merits. Your analogy is fine, however the two players you’ve offered are not difficult to choose between based on their juxtaposition, they are difficult to choose between because they both have a statistically insignificant number of carries (in the context of TJs analysis).

by poorboywilly on Nov 29, 2009 10:50 AM MST up reply actions  

Analogies are different from the subjects at hand.

THAT is precisely why they can be helpful. If they were just the same, they wouldn’t help you see the issue from a different and hopefully illuminating angle.

by warmick on Nov 29, 2009 1:27 PM MST up reply actions  

broncosmontana

Kind of touched on this up above, but I think I would prefer if receptions were included so that it is fumbles as a percentage of “touches” instead of carries. Likely this won’t change the comparative merits of the backs too much (although Forte and Smith had quite a few receptions I believe while Adrian Peterson had few), but I think it would be more fair to count all of a RBs touches. It’s kind of like in baseball how walks just don’t count in batting average. Well the guy got on base didn’t he? He was up to bat wasn’t he?

by poorboywilly on Nov 28, 2009 11:53 AM MST reply actions  

Jason, Excellent request.

Perhaps I can gather than information later today and bring it to light.

I’m guessing the general trends won’t change too much, but I really would like to know the answer just like you!

Thanks again, mate. Appreciate the feedback.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 12:05 PM MST up reply actions  

Again

I mentioned something I didn’t like…but forgot to say great job overall and I like this compilation of information!

by poorboywilly on Nov 28, 2009 12:11 PM MST up reply actions  

sorry man

Didn’t mean to give you a bunch more work like that. Maybe you should pay me not to be your assistant. ^^

"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.

by broncosmontana on Nov 28, 2009 4:14 PM MST up reply actions  

+1

Great thought.

Wouldn’t mind seeing something like this for Marshall/Royal/Sheffler either. Apples and oranges, but still…

- Jason

I gather speed by you f***ing with me - EV

by jubei on Nov 28, 2009 12:07 PM MST up reply actions  

Nice post, Dude.

One thing I have seen from Moreno over the last few games is better vision. That goes beyond just finding the crease, it also involves him seeing the approaching tackler and making the decision of when to cover the ball with both hands. Not being a RB, I can’t really speak to the issue directly, but that decision of when to go from one hand to two is a pretty big deal. Wait too long, and you run the risk of losing the ball. Play it too safe and you may not have the speed to take advantage of a hole opening up.

The point is, at first this season, that decision seemed to come late, which I would chalk up to not being used to the speed of the pro game. Now, if anything, he’s a bit over-cautious. As he gets more experience under his belt, his instincts will take over, and that transition will happen a lot closer to the ideal moment.

My gut tells me the kid is not only going to be fine, he’s going to be special. You can see his running improving, and his pass-catching and blitz pickup will come along with time.

Nice article!

- Jason

I gather speed by you f***ing with me - EV

by jubei on Nov 28, 2009 12:03 PM MST reply actions  

If Moreno only has one more fumble, then this number will drastically lower.

Let’s see how he does moving forward.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The guy formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 28, 2009 12:16 PM MST reply actions  

+1

One factor we haven’t discussed is the holdout, and how that may have put him behind the curve as far as getting game-speed (even in preseason) carries and hits. Do we think that could have anything to do with the fumbling? Maybe the kinks are being worked out a little late because of the late start?

- Nick

"We got 'em right where we want 'em!" - Keith Bishop, right before John Elway orchestrated The Drive. 'Nuff said.

by ncm42 on Nov 28, 2009 12:23 PM MST up reply actions  

Tim, I think if we removed the "missile" Reed hit and the Russ knee, his numbers would be right in line

…of course, we can’t do that. But I’m not overly concerned.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 1:27 PM MST up reply actions  

Great stuff 'Stat Man'

Being one that was not on the ‘draft-Moreno’ bandwagon, I felt at first we had made a mistake. I’ve changed my mind after watching him run the last several games. I think the fumbles will be less of a problem from here on out (I don’t think he wants ‘The Beast’ to give him any more shoves…lol).

The one thing I would like to see in Moreno is that weired zone Davis went into once pass the line. Its seems like Davis would somehow become this 4.35 / 40 guy that no-one could catch. Other than that I like Moreno.

Guardian of the Gate to La La Land!
Gonsoulin, Taylor, Little, Wright, Gradishar, Atwater, Davis, and Sharpe...
Why are they not in the Hall...I just don't understand.

by Mike Clark on Nov 28, 2009 1:00 PM MST reply actions  

MIke, I think if Moreno could get to the 2nd level without clutter, he could break one..

like the 1998 Dallas Thankgiving game that Davis had…..I remember that game well…you are exactly right. Davis had “wheels” that day.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 1:29 PM MST up reply actions  

Thanks again TJ

Your stats articles are a nice addition to MHR and I love how you explain them and how you write. We’ve got a good set of writers here at MHR, and you jumped in and kept bringing the quality stuff as well.

by studbucket on Nov 28, 2009 1:16 PM MST reply actions  

Don't have time to read everyone's comments...

So give me a freebie if someone’s already said this but:

Even the cause of fumbles themselves is sometimes a completely random thing. Granted, there are many times that it is the runner’s fault the ball hits the turf, but there are also quite a few times that no matter how well you protect the ball, its going to come out. I know I have seen it happen many times. Take Brian Dawkin’s spear last night for an example. I don’t care how strong you are, or even if you held that to your chest with both arms, a hit that precise will jar any ball free.

I want Moreno to have a bit better ball security, but as for how that impacts my opinion of him as a runner, its not a big deal right now. He’s a rookie, he’s got time to learn. If the ball is still coming out this much in a couple years (and it looks to be more his fault than just stellar defensive plays) than I will consider changing my opinion a little.

Great post though, love it!

ORANGE CRUSH! ... need I say more?

by USMCWall on Nov 28, 2009 2:18 PM MST reply actions  

Good post, dude

I don’t want to see Moreno dropping jockstraps or footballs…just jaws.

I have faith in him and Bobby Turner.

"All credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses." Friedrich Nietzsche

by Horsepower on Nov 28, 2009 2:27 PM MST reply actions  

  • snort!! ** ^^ Omg, milk through my nose HP!

"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.

by broncosmontana on Nov 28, 2009 4:16 PM MST up reply actions  

HP..haha

I should clarify…..metaphorically speaking:-)

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 5:33 PM MST up reply actions  

Other than our lady posters, no one does
I don’t want to see Moreno dropping jockstraps or footballs

We will be well off without him having a ‘Hester’ moment, too ;-)

Moreno/Buckhalter in '09

by Doc Bear on Nov 28, 2009 3:04 PM MST reply actions  

Nice piece, TJ.

Someone mentioned the holdout at the beginning of Training Camp as a possible factor in his holding onto the ball. I wouldn’t discount that as it has something to do with him adjusting to the speed of the pro game. If I remember correctly TD and Portis really started carrying the rock about game 6 in the season. Both of them were there at the start of TC. Game 11 – Knowshon ran with his eyes. May be something there.

Thanks for your time, TJ. Good perspective.

by Blackknigh on Nov 28, 2009 3:19 PM MST reply actions  

Great post, Dude...

Except one of your tables has a typo. I don’t think TD ever put the ball on the ground. :-)

"People who work together will win, whether it be against complex football defenses, or the problems of modern society." - Vince Lombardi

by broncospriestess on Nov 28, 2009 5:04 PM MST reply actions  

I should have re-checked that one. As I recall, his average yards/carry was like 12.5, no?

Also, I think his 40 time was 4.2 and he breathed fire and snorted thunder.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 5:17 PM MST up reply actions  

BALL SECURITY

Fumbling the ball is undesirable but ball security is primarily an issue of prevent-ability. Moreno can be blamed for his initial fumbles because he carried the ball too loosely, or at least he been earlier in the season. Neither of the first two fumbles, against Dallas and New England, were the result of true carelessness, though.

And, as others have pointed out here, the fumbles against Baltimore and San Diego also weren’t the result of lax ball security.

Moreno has taken steps to increase ball security, such as holding the ball with both arms, so the issue of his fumbling is somewhat overblown. As we saw during Cutlergate, issues are often as much about the controversy that develops once an issue is raised. The issue of Moreno fumbling is about the argument over Moreno fumbling rather than the event itself — it’s a Moreno fumbling simulacrum.

Please note that Buckhalter has fumbled 3 times (2 were lost) for his 93 carries whereas Moreno has 161 carries. The perception of these two RBs is quite different despite the statistical evidence the suggests otherwise.

Again, to reiterate, I see this issue as one of ball security. The only fumble that I don’t blame partly on Moreno is the one that Ed Reed caused. However, Moreno can do better, and apologizing for his fumbles only obscures the extent to which he can improve in that area. Moreno can indeed improve in this area and in his last game, against New York, he showed that he’s learning to wait on blocks and lessen the number of opportunities that defensive players have to make unexpected hits that dislodge the ball. He’s made progress in areas of his running but it’s largely gone unnoticed — apparently. The issue of fumbling has dominated discussion on his performance and preempted discussion of other facets of his game.

We can only reasonably ask that Moreno take steps to prevent fumbles. I wouldn’t want to see him become so cautious that he substantially reduces his yards-gained ave., just so he can avoid fumbles. We have to accept some fumbles as part of the price of having a successful running attack, just as some interceptions are incidental to having a successful passing attack. We can minimize what’s preventable as much as possible but to dwell on it excessively invites ineffectiveness. I’d rather we focused on the positive than the negative. Steps that avoid the negative often cost more than their worth.

no goats, no glory.

by Colinski on Nov 28, 2009 5:05 PM MST reply actions  

Colinski, good point regarding Buckhalter

Although I agree with your general point regarding his performance being overshadowed by the fumble, the fumbling was worth exploring, if nothing else, to point out that it should not be a concern going forward.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 5:22 PM MST up reply actions  

Thoughtful contribution, as always

As far as your statement below, I had a question I’d like to pose:

The only fumble that I don’t blame partly on Moreno is the one that Ed Reed caused.

Are you saying that the blind-sided flying tackle, delivered by Ed Reed was somehow preventable? I don’t mean to dwell on this, especially since it’s impossible to change the result of that game, but I do wonder how you believe that KM could’ve prevented a fumble on that play. If memory serves, he hadn’t even turned yet, and #20 was on him.

Otherwise, I agree with your conclusion that to make a RB play in ways that nearly gurantee ball security and maintain possession for the next down are conservative to the extreme, to the point where the gain through its execution is negligible, if not “ineffective,” as you stated.

"All credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses." Friedrich Nietzsche

by Horsepower on Nov 29, 2009 12:28 AM MST up reply actions  

re: Reed caused fumble

No, I was saying the opposite.

It says: "The only fumble that I don’t blame partly on Moreno is the one that Ed Reed caused. "

That section was poorly worded for the context.

What I was saying is that fumbles are still the responsibility of the ball handler even though we recognize that some are unavoidable. Getting hit by Reed under those circumstances wasn’t an instance where Moreno can be blamed. All other instances can be placed partly on Moreno’s shoulders even though he didn’t carry the ball loosely on those three occasions. The point is that you hold the RB responsible instead of looking for excuses every time there’s a fumble. Good RBs learn how to avoid fumbles while reaching a happy medium between ball security and gaining extra yardage.

Interestingly, NFL statistics only lists 2 fumbles for Moreno, and even if we argue with the accuracy of those statistics, he’s still well within the statistical norm. Therefore, since visual analysis of each fumble doesn’t reveal ball security issues, the issue is overblown. Fumbles are only an issue when preventable and ball security is an issue. The goal is to play optimal football, which entails eliminating unnecessary mistakes, but also gain extra yardage whenever prudent.

no goats, no glory.

by Colinski on Nov 29, 2009 10:19 AM MST up reply actions  

Gotcha

You’ll have to excuse me, I’m an engineer and if anyone can split hairs on a gnat’s rear end, it’s a person like me =)

Again, it’s not important as we have much to look forward to, but the way I read it was, if Moreno wasn’t blamed partly, then that means the blame falls squarely on his shoulders. Reading your response, I understand now what you meant and thanks for the explanation.

Good RBs learn how to avoid fumbles while reaching a happy medium between ball security and gaining extra yardage.

I fully agree. What amazes me in the NFL, is the sheer speed of the game. These players did not walk off the street and put on a uniform – these guys are world-class athletes/players. Doing the basics such as protecting the football, reading the field ahead, making a decision, and acting on it while covering up the ball sound so elementary, yet are so easy to abandon in haste, due to the anticipation of what a good defense is capable of.

In other words, no matter how talented a RB is and how effective an offensive scheme can be, a great defense can still neautralize that strength, making that great player look very average.

Finally, Hochstein’s contribution to Moreno’s last fumble to date was unavoidable, as a man with his speed ought not expect a 300 lb. offensive lineman to “catch up to him” on any given play. Much less expect it to be knee-kicked right out of his hands, as that has to be a one in a million type scenario. This is a great example of your statement:

Fumbles are only an issue when preventable and ball security is an issue.

Agreed, as well. Moreno simply did what RBs do in that situation: he stretched out with both hands on the ball to break the plane. I’ve heard the argument that KM should’ve taken what the defense was giving him, especially since it was only 1st and goal, but it’s a moot point now.

"All credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses." Friedrich Nietzsche

by Horsepower on Nov 29, 2009 10:42 AM MST up reply actions  

a few more comments

Speaking from a logician’s perspective — being “partly to blame” is a subset of being “fully to blame.” He was therefore in no part to blame. “Not” modifies “blame” rather than “partly.” English grammar doesn’t express this distinction very well any more (it did once). Older grammars (such as Latin) are precise and eliminate potential confusion.

Moreno shares some of the blame on the other fumbles even though his ball security wasn’t an issue. The reason I used “partly” is because it’s necessary for the RB to understand that it’s his responsibility to prevent fumbles. Whether or not the fumble appears to have been unavoidable, his actions are inextricably interwoven with how the play unfolds.

The Ed Reed hit happened before Moreno had the chance to react. The loophole in the rules establishes possession after a few steps but this isn’t enough time to adequately “secure the ball.” Possession has been defined as an extremely brief period of time in order to qualify certain catches as receptions — such as going out of bounds — but this is too brief a period to retain control under many circumstances.

My solution would be to create an equivocal standard for possession. Possession could be established quickly (two steps) but wouldn’t transfer to the defense in the event of hit occurring while the receiver is still “gathering it in.” A hit at this point that dislodges the ball would determine that the reception was incomplete (i.e., reverts to an incompletion). I think we’d see less emphasis on destroying the receiver and more on preventing the catch. Champ Bailey is a master at this technique, so it wouldn’t hurt the quality of the game.

no goats, no glory.

by Colinski on Nov 29, 2009 12:20 PM MST up reply actions  

Since English is my 4th language, I’ll take your word for it. The use of negative logic in speaking now versus long ago is interesting. I guess this language has been bastardized so much over the last few centuries, it’s probably unrecognizable to the classic logician, historian, writer, or philosopher.

Prior to the Reed tackle, I think it’s safe to say that Moreno had possession of the football, as he had control of it with his hands and both feet were down (well inbounds.) So to call it a fumble after possession has been established was the right call, as much as it pains me to admit it.

To be truthful, my opinion of Moreno’s fumbles appear to be quite the opposite from yours. If a RB has a chance to use his vision, then at that point, one can at least partially blame him for a fumble, as he at least had time to secure it in some way. In the case of his blind-sided hit from Reed, where he did not even have a chance to use his vision to then process his next move, I give him a pass. In the game where he lost the football over the goal line, I believe that first, it was a touchdown and second, since the refs did not see it that way, the fumble was at least partially his fault.

I do like your idea of establishing a standard for possession. It certainly would protect the players from being injured on certain plays as well as disallowing the defense a chance to take possession away from the offense. Fumble recoveries by defenses would then be attainable only by punching it loose. I now understand your angle – you just want Champ to get more INTs this year! Now there’s a campaign I can get behind =)

"All credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses." Friedrich Nietzsche

by Horsepower on Nov 29, 2009 1:52 PM MST up reply actions  

I would guess

that english is your first language

Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.

by Sean in Pa. on Nov 29, 2009 2:48 PM MST up reply actions  

Thank you sir

"All credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses." Friedrich Nietzsche

by Horsepower on Nov 29, 2009 8:38 PM MST up reply actions  

HP, what are your other 3?

Que interesante si hablas español, amigo.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 30, 2009 12:00 AM MST up reply actions  

Currently bilingual

My ethnicity’s Hungarian, which was the first. I was born in Transylvania (yes, that place) and spoke Romanian, which is another derivetaive of Latin, like Spanish and Italian. The third was German before this one, but as they say, if you don’t use it, you lose it.

Are you fluent in Spanish?

"All credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses." Friedrich Nietzsche

by Horsepower on Nov 30, 2009 7:15 PM MST up reply actions  

El duderino es genio.

If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.

by Troy Hufford on Nov 30, 2009 9:44 PM MST up reply actions  

final comment, on language

Linguistics is clearly out of my field but my understanding is that English lost many of it’s case forms in the course of cultural/business interchange because it interfered with understanding. Slight differences between modern English and neighboring languages (Frisian) were an obstacle to communication and thus were dropped in a lowest common denominator phenomenon — it’s believed (from The Story of English). What’s surprising is that grammar in general — (I believe) — has moved from the complex to the simple, rather than the opposite as might be expected. The result is imprecision and occasional confusion.

Regarding this:

“To be truthful, my opinion of Moreno’s fumbles appear to be quite the opposite from yours.”

Actually, we seem to agree, so I must have communicated the idea poorly.

Regarding my suggestion on establishing possession. There is a binary prejudice that leads people to believe that possession must be an ‘either or’ phenomenon. I think the game would improve if DBs went back to focusing on preventing the reception rather than making a big hit and dislodging the ball. The infrequency of CBs “sighting the ball” nowadays might be partly attributable to the tendency to hit after the catch rather than prevent the catch.

no goats, no glory.

by Colinski on Nov 30, 2009 7:35 PM MST up reply actions  

Oops

I need to rephrase the quoted sentence: To be truthful, my opinion of Moreno’s fumbles appear to match yours.

 

It’s amazing how we fundamentally agree, yet due to the message construct in your sentence, I reference a negative to draw my conclusion, while you seem to use two to address yours. From a technical point of view, when you state: "’partly to blame’ is a subset of being ‘fully to blame’" and "He was therefore in no part to blame" is interpreted by me in a very different way. My true source of confusion seems to stem from your conclusion. My neo-scientific brain tells me that if a subset is false, and it is the only subset, then the set must be true. You’ve concluded that both the subset and the set are false. So basically, your logic originating in English grammar makes the subset and your conclusion mutually exclusive – fascinating. I guess I’ve learned to speak but not think in the way English was originally intended.

 

I believe my original interpretation of your reasoning above is an example of the following, from Wikipedia: "Nietzsche addresses the concept of simulacrum (but does not use the term) in The Twilight of the Idols, suggesting that most philosophers, by ignoring the reliable input of their senses and resorting to the constructs of language and reason, arrive at a distorted copy of reality."

 

If Nietzsche was right, I would make a poor philosopher. So I guess I’d better stick to my senses then.

"All credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses." Friedrich Nietzsche

by Horsepower on Dec 1, 2009 6:20 PM MST up reply actions  

Thanks Dude...nice post. Moreno is becoming the player I saw in college and I am stoked....fumbles normally a slip in concentration....

He needs to be on top of that, but clearly is taking the correct steps!

Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.

by boydy2669 on Nov 28, 2009 5:40 PM MST reply actions  

Boydy, thanks, homie.

I concur, his history and the percentages suggest he’s just fine.

"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

by TJ Johnson on Nov 28, 2009 6:25 PM MST up reply actions  

Very nice TJ

I thought your analysis here had validity and it was quantified well, even though it appears that you can’t please everyone. ;-)

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks

by KaptainKirk on Nov 29, 2009 12:19 AM MST reply actions  

Why...that would be futile, Kaptain =)

"All credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses." Friedrich Nietzsche

by Horsepower on Nov 29, 2009 12:20 AM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Zozobra_small
Explaining What "IT" Is that Tebow Has: An Analysis of the Art of Miracles
Pumpkin_small
The risk/reward analysis on drafting RBs earlier vs later
Images-2_small
Calling out IAOFM
Fabio_elway_grade_small
What the Broncos have already made this offseason
Me_as_a_simpson_small
The State of the Roster (Offense)

Recent FanPosts

Work___family_062_small
I Hate This!
Work___family_062_small
The Question Of Leadership!
Work___family_062_small
Vanity, Vanity! All, is Vanity!
Small
Only my opinion
_62_broncos_small
View from section 125 free agent guess
Dive_small
Tim Tebow's 2011 Turnaround Theme Song
Small
Target this DT
Notamused_small
An insight into John Fox's Quarterback philosophy
610x_small
FA, Who we should be taking a hard look at.
Sift_heads_world_act_5_300_small
Should Tebow start at MLB?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

Dadndaughter_small Tim Lynch

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Position Coach

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Flag_canada_small Colby

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Small zsheely

2011-12-10_23 IanHenson

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk