Does history repeat?
Broncos Fast Starts Usually Equal Faster Fades
I pulled numbers for the past ten years because based on my memory I seem to recall that Denver perennially start their seasons fast. The numbers I found support that. In 7 of the past 10 seasons (including this one) the Broncos came out of the gate quickly with records of 4-1 or better in every one of those years. Here are the numbers.
In 2009 they started 6-0 and are currently 6-1 riding a one game losing streak.
In 2008 they started 4-1 and finished 4-7 to close the season 8-8 and miss the playoffs
In 2006 they started 5-1 and finished 4-6 to close the season 9-7 and miss the playoffs
In 2005 they started 5-1 and finished 8-2 to close the season 13-3. They were 1-1 in the POs.
In 2004 they started 5-1 and finished 5-5 to close the season 10-6. They were 0-1 in the POs.
In 2003 they started 5-1and finished 5-5 to close the season 10-6. They were 0-1 in the POs.
In 2002 they started 4-1 and finished 5-6 to close the season 9-7 and miss the playoffs.
Out of all those quick starts, the Broncos only managed to make the post season three times. In 2003 and 2004 they went one and done in the POs and in 2005, despite hosting the AFC Championship game, they were destroyed by the Pittsburgh Steelers. So (not including this season) the past six years the Broncos started fast to the tune of 28-6 they struggled to the finish line by playing .500 football (31-31) with only three postseason appearances and one postseason win. That’s downright pathetic. If you exclude 2005 which is the only time they have had a winning record after starting fast their closing record dips to a dismal 23-29.
The other three seasons where they did not get off to such good starts were:
In 2007 they went 7-9 after starting 2-0 and missed the playoffs.
In 2001 they went 8-8 after starting 2-0 and missed the playoffs.
In 2000 they went 11-5 after starting 2-1 and were one and done in the playoffs.
Denver regularly starts fast. This years results are very much in line with what they’ve been doing year in and year out for the past decade. Until they prove that they can sustain their play for an entire season they have done nothing. That’s just the way it is. You would think that Broncos fans would temper their enthusiasm a bit to see if this team is any different than the numerous teams before them. Until they get it done in November, December and January, when it counts the most. I don’t see this year’s edition being any different than the faltering Broncos teams of the past decade.
The jury is still out. However, there is historical precedent to back the theory that this team will struggle down the stretch. It happens on an almost annual basis. Why wouldn’t it happen again this season. Especially when you factor in the remaining schedule.
I do think the Broncos will win their division. Why? Because KC and OAK are incapable of winning 6 games between them and SD has proven that their D is next to nonexistent. That should get the Broncos a first round home game against the likes of the Ravens or Bengals. Good luck with that Broncos.
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
0 recs |
50 comments
| Add comment
Comments
This years team is diferent
we have a solid D, that will games for us. Our O will get it going, McD will not let THIS team fall on its face. GO BRONCOS 13-3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
live and die blue and orange
by jerry251 on Nov 5, 2009 8:48 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Is everybody in agreement
That Josh McDaniels is a better head coach than Mike Shanahan? That’s fairly surprising to me. It seems a bit early to be annointing McD the next coming in the coaching ranks. Historically Patriots assistants have struggled after leaving. Crennel and Mangini have not fared well in the professional ranks and Weiss continues to struggle at Notre Dame. I would think there would be a bit more skepticism about the coach and the remainder of the season based on the aforementioned second half struggles the Broncos seem to have on an almost annual basis.
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 8:54 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Whether McDaniels ends up being a better HC than Shannahan...
remains to be seen IMHO. But, during the Shannahan years of the past decade by midseason the league in general figured out the Shannahan offense and began shutting it down. 2005 is the exception not the rule on that. Most years the Defense couldn’t keep us in most of the games we lost. That and the conditioning of the current team seems to be much better that what it was with Shannahan and that will play a key role in how the Broncos fair down the road.
And really who cares what Crennel, Weiss and Mangini are doing anyway, different men in different situations period.
by bchiper on Nov 5, 2009 9:01 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Please, stop comparing
McD and other “Patriot’s assistants”. Each is their own man, and each makes their own history. None of them are dependent for success or failure on anything other than themselves and the scheme they have learned. If they had all succeeded, it would say othing about McDs potential. The scheme itself should not be in question, as it works well for the Pats. It is up to each of those who have been apprenticed in it to amend the lessons learned to fit his own strengths, weaknesses, and character in a manner to assure success for their team.
As to it being early in the process, of course it is. I like what I see so far. I would be surprised if we “fade”, although the record may not look as shiny over the next several weeks. I do consider it possible we will struggle with the stronger teams on the schedule, but doubt we will fall the the weaker ones. As the process of our make-over is still early, this is all I ask…… I was impressed with the personnel upgrades in the off-season and expect to be equally impressed with next year’s.
by idahobronc on Nov 5, 2009 3:52 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we should remember that starting fast and fading is a Mike Shanahan trait
Remember, our teams were part of a “country club” where training camp was not as physical as it should have been. We would start great and fade because our guys were not conditioned well enough.
McDaniels has changed that…there should be no fade late. Our guys should get stronger as the season wears on. I am not worried about any historical trend because the only basis we have is this year, since its a new coach, new training regimen and new everything.
Ask me against in three years. :)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
by Tim Lynch on Nov 5, 2009 9:11 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Smells like
A Steelers fan is in the house. Welcome to MHR. Good statistics and enthusiasm. You really can’t compare this team though. New coach, over 30 new players from last year, and new attitude in the building.
And there was a good article in the National Football Post about Mangini that highlighted McDaniels rise in the Patriots organization. I think it’s safe to say he’s a much different coach than Crennel, Weis, and certainly Mangenius. The article was posted on the MHR and I’m sure someone can link to it for me.
I for one would love to play the Ravens and Bengals at home. Mile High will rock!
"No more my bad just make the play"-McJedi
by RockyMountainThunder on Nov 5, 2009 9:12 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
You are correct
I am a life long Steelers fan. I post somewhat regularly at BTSC. I noticed a number of Denver fans showing up on that site and making bold, unsubstantiated predictions about this weeks game and the remainder of the season. I tend to find that a bit annoying.
I thought I’d reciprocate a bit, but try to base my post around some factual evidence and not solely on my opinion. The facts suggest that the Broncos have struggled on an annual basis. They also suggest that ex Patriots assistants tend to struggle after leaving that organization. Because of that, I’m going to adopt a wait and see approach with regards to this season’s Bronco’s team. After all, championships aren’t won in September and October. I think fans of both team’s should know that by now.
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 9:30 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
"Bold Unsubstantiated Predictions"
No offense, King Coebra, but you also have made some “bold predictions” in here concerning the fate of the 2009 Denver Broncos based on substantiated facts, sure, but failing to acknowledge that the recent Bronco fades occurred under a totally different coaching regime. Furthermore, perhaps, Broncos’ fans making predictions on the Steelers’ page are basing their opinions on the fact that the Steelers have failed to win in Denver during the regular season since 1990 and that Denver owns a lifetime record of 16-9-1 against Pittsburgh including winning at Denver in 2007, 31-28, in 2006 at Pittsburgh 31-20 and at Denver in 2003, 17-14. I will concede that Pittsburgh has beaten the Broncos more recently in the most important matchup between the two clubs, that being the 2005 AFC Championship Game in Denver’s backyard by returning the favor for the 1997 AFC Championship Game loss at the hands of the Broncos. Regardless of the past history, this is a different Broncos team than the one that has had recent success against the Steelers. It will be a good game and the Steelers could very well win. We’ll see come Monday night.
by RSH089 on Nov 5, 2009 10:01 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
You're right
I should have stuck to the facts and not thrown out a prediction at the end of the post. However I did predict you’d win the division and host a first round playoff game. It’s not as if I was predicting you won’t win again this year. As far as I know that’s the only prediction I made. Please correct me if I’m wrong on this.
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 8:50 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
That there Sir is why we hired a new coach...
"So tell me what happened."
"Well, the last thing I remember is seeing this flash of Blue and Orange and the #22... then everything just went black..."
by HillisRanUover on Nov 5, 2009 9:13 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
The Broncos are off to a great start
Because of that there has been a ton of praise heaped on McDaniels. I just want to see if everybody in Bronco land is drinking the kool aid. I have seen unbridled enthusiasm and, pardon the pun, mile high expectations based on the unexpected quick start by much of the fan base. I haven’t really seen a single person who has come out and admitted that starting fast is nothing new for this organization. Or a “let’s wait and see if the team and coach can keep it up.” I completely understand supporting your team and having high expectations. I’m just somewhat amazed that more of you don’t have a “let’s wait and see” attitude because of the team’s past failures down the stretch.
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 9:15 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Every Game
You are excited for a win and dissapointed for a loss. We have a lot to be excited about 6-1 is 6-1. If they fade down the stretch sure will be dissapointed but what’s the point of having a wait and see attitude. Just be excited for what they are right now and enjoy the ride for as long as it lasts. I’m not going to “root scared” or cautiously because of past failures. But I don’t smack talk either.
"No more my bad just make the play"-McJedi
by RockyMountainThunder on Nov 5, 2009 9:24 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Even your own coach Tomlin said...
Last year was last year… this year is a new team… seeking to establish it’s own legacy. I think he was right.
You can tie together historical events, when you have common contributing factors… such as the same Head Coach. The way Mike Shannahan developed his team and game plans had a consistent result toward the end of the season. You can certainly see that by looking at History.
But this team has a different coach, and a completely different philosophy… so you don’t have common contributing factors to compare.
Think of it this way…You can plant an apple tree in the ground, and year after year you will get apples. But if you plant an orange tree in that same ground, you can’t expect to get apples, just because “historically” you got apples from the tree in that ground. It really makes no sense.
Based on history, we knew what to expect from a Shannahan led Bronco’s team… history has proved that point.
However, with McDaniels, we have no History to base any kind of assumptions or expectations on, so to do so would be foolish.
"So tell me what happened."
"Well, the last thing I remember is seeing this flash of Blue and Orange and the #22... then everything just went black..."
by HillisRanUover on Nov 5, 2009 10:03 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a solid argument
You may be on to something there when comparing apples to oranges. Then again it might just be another illusion. At this point in the season, all anyone is doing is prognosticating and hoping that things will be different. Maybe it’s more like apples and apples? They may be different types but essentially they taste the same. Who can say for sure?
I didn’t come on here to berate your team and insinuate it’s a forgone conclusion the Broncos will falter down the stretch. I took the time to do some research on a team I’m not that intimately familiar with and based on the facts I found developed a post pointing out what is an historical fact. You don’t have to like what I posted, but you also can’t deny that it has happened. Over and over and over again.
Clearly most on here are going to disagree with me. I don’t blame you. Some have pointed out possible reasons this season will be different and others apparently just cling to wishful thinking. My point is that there is no way to know for sure how this season will turn out. It’s possible the Broncos have turned the corner and will dominate the league for years to come behind the genius of Josh McDaniels. But it’s also just as likely they haven’t and won’t. I don’t know for sure and neither do any one of you.
Many outside of the Broncos fan base have seen this type of start out of this team before. Is it really that unreasonable that we should be a bit skeptical?
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 9:01 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I welcome your comments
They start an interesting debate and probably prick at a few unspoken fears too here for some.
Others have outlined the reasons why we have reason to be more positive right from better conditioning through to varied week by week game planning.
We know there will be setbacks on the way from time to time, we might not like them but begrudgingly accept them. However we are an entirely different team, with an entirely different philosophy to the previous years.
You are absolutely correct that we not accurately predict the outcome of the season even now. Not at least in the W-L sense. We can speculate that we should win the two KC games, the Raiders and the Skins but by that very speculation we would court disaster.
However what we do know without fail as we see it on game day and what we hear from the likes of McD, Nolan, Orton and BDawk that this team is different. It is focused, has no egos and the whole atmosphere at Dove Valley has changed.
There is a calm assurance in what we this organization is trying to do and achieve in the long run.
If history were to repeat itself it would be coincidence and not history per se. This is the first season of our new history. What history DOES teach us in that you have the best and most competitive side in the NFL. One that demands respect by its very achievements over decades performing for the majority of that time at the highest level. That is something to envy.
If we were not to win another single game this year though we know that whatever weaknesses we have will be fixed in time. It is unlikely that we are going to build the start od a dynasty over a single night.
In essence history is rightfully yours, but however this season plays out for us, it is going to take a lot of convincing that the future isn’t ours.
Enjoy Monday KC, it is going to be a treat for us all
I have so many friends some I haven't even used yet
by BlobTheMagnificent on Nov 6, 2009 12:25 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent reply
Very well thought out and nicely written. I appreciate your insight. The game on Monday should, indeed, be a good one.
by King Coebra on Nov 6, 2009 8:37 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
something to consider
I read in a couple of different places (one of them being here at MHR) an analysis of the Broncos’ tendency to fade during the latter half of the season, particularly in the last 3-5 years.
Those reports attributed the fade, at least in part, to the size and conditioning of the offensive and defensive lines. In the past, the Denver lines have been undersized (by NFL standards) and relied on quickness rather than bulk to beat the opposition. The problem became that by the end of the season, the lines were worn out by going up against heavier opponents.
Somewhere else I saw a story that told how the players on the Broncos teams of the last several years lost an average of something like 9 lbs per player over the course of the year last year. McDaniels and his staff took steps to address nutrition and conditioning.
It’s factors like that the bring the optimism that you’ve alluded to.
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by BShrout on Nov 5, 2009 9:24 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
I'd be interested
If you find the link please post it. I’ll definitely read it.
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 10:00 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Well Cutler brought are average down when he lost all of that diabetes weight.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 6, 2009 6:34 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point if
Shanny was the coach and we had allot last years players on the team. You can only evaluate a new coach and team on the current year and trends. Which have been 6 wins 1 loss. Thats about all you can evaluate. You can not apply old trends to a new caoch and basicly new roster. It just doesn’t work out. But your right we need to keep thing in perspective. Lets not get ahead of ourselves as Broncos fans. First, lets kick the Steelers A_ _ ! Monday night. Then you can go away like every other teams fans Trolls that come in here week in an week out. Thats what I am waiting for. One game at a time.
Go Broncos!!!!!!
by NoCALbronco on Nov 5, 2009 9:34 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Every year
The players change. Clearly there has been a bigger overhaul this off season than in most prior years. That still doesn’t prove anything. Maybe this team is better conditioned, better coached, better defensively and better overall than they have been in years past. Maybe not. There are still a lot of games on the schedule. You need to get it done down the stretch and in the playoffs before claiming you’ve turned the corner and all is right in Bronco Land. Does anybody seriously disagree with that statement?
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 9:06 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
I’m a troll because I posted a logical argument based on historical fact? Solid argument.
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 9:40 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
You're not a troll
Just a hard-core Steelers fan poking back at a rival. :D
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by BShrout on Nov 5, 2009 9:42 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
My bad
not a troll. You are entitled to be a passionat fan. Understand, my argument was not if you are a troll. It is if you can compare previose years to a current year under a new coach? I just don’t think you can. Especialy when you have allot of new players. We will see.
by NoCALbronco on Nov 5, 2009 9:51 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
absolutely agree with you NCB
we’re comparing apples to orange
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by BShrout on Nov 5, 2009 10:25 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Historical fact ...
Well … a look into the past is not necessarily a look into the future. This is interesting reading but hardly compelling.
by Hank44 on Nov 5, 2009 10:05 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
I was pretty surprised by the results my research turned up. I knew the Broncos had struggled the past couple of seasons but wasn’t aware it had been going on for as long as it actually has.
I’m also not saying that McD and this team won’t turn the tide around this season. It’s certainly possible. But until they actually do it, I, like most non Bronco’s fans, am going to just have to wait and see. The schedule down the stretch is fairly difficult and I could definitely see this team going 5-5 down the stretch. You still have PIT, NYG, PHI, IND and a number of divisional games that are never gimmes.
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 9:52 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Sorry about the replies
I don’t know what is going on. I have hit the reply on every one of my posts but for some reason is does not seem to be working very well. My “Actually” post was in reply to “You’re not a troll”. My “Really” post was in reply to “Good point if” and “The Broncos are off to a great start” was in reply to “Whether McDaniels ends up being better…”
I have to get ready for work. I’ll check back later to see how many others I have offended with historical reality. ;)
I hope everybody has a great day. Seriously.
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 9:58 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Historical reality
is that a cach was fired becase of these stated failures. Historical reality also states that Broncos are 16-9-1 lifetime against the Steelers. I am not offended by historical reality that is applied correctly and is relevant to the current year and situation. Like we Got our A_ _ handed to us by the Ravens. The current historical reality is that the Broncos are 6-1 REALITY! the Steelers are 5-2 REALITY! We will play Monday night REALITY! I am wasting my time REALITY!
by NoCALbronco on Nov 5, 2009 10:15 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
actually
I’d be impressed if we go 5-5 down the stretch, given that we only have 9 games left. ;-p
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by BShrout on Nov 5, 2009 10:26 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Me too
There are actually two ways you can go 5-5 down the stretch.
1. If you include the loss to the Ravens, then 5-5 would put you at 11-5 and most likely in the playoffs.
2. If you don’t include the loss to the Ravens then 5-5 would imply finishing the regular season 5-4 and losing in the first round of the playoffs.
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 9:12 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I personally think we lose on Monday
And I’m as big a fan as they get. I’m also slightly realistic and know that our team has a lot to prove and the Steelers won the SB last year. If we win, that would be awesome.
As to your historic fact, it’s a new year, new coach, I think those problems were mostly from the previous regime as we would often fade in the second half of games as well. I’m giving our new coach the benefit of the doubt.
As to your historical reference to other Bellichek disciples, I think that’s horse sh*t. You can’t apply the same broad brush to McD. Each person is an individual and will create their own unique legacy.
This is our team, let's have fun with it! - dmitchell624
Nothing sucks more than that moment during an argument when you realize you're wrong.
by solace on Nov 5, 2009 9:53 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Clarification
The stats and facts I have presented are not “my” historical fact. They are real results that did occur during each and every year that I documented them. They are indeed historical fact and can not be disputed as much as you would all like them to go away. They are also the primary reason that the majority of the rest of the football world outside the Broncos fan base is not yet sold on this year’s team.
There have been some solid arguments and theories presented as to why the results of the past decade are no longer relevant. However, until Denver actually puts together a solid stretch run and makes some noise in the postseason, the doubters are not going to go away.
Let’s not try to spin my post into some wild figment of my imagination. The results are there, in black and white. I did not create them. Your franchise did.
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 10:22 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I finally get your point
Which I believe lies in the phrase “They are also the primary reason that the majority of the rest of the football world outside the Broncos fan base is not yet sold on this year’s team.”
And of course you are right. We might know this is entirely different situation to the previous years but until we prove it the rest of the football world will remain skeptical. They after all will only consume the fodder that is given out in the MSM and not look at the what is actually going on.So I guess until we do it in hard cold Wins and Losses then that is what people will think.
It is probably something we are all guilty of when looking at a new season’s fixtures where ultimately we decide who is going to win or finish bottom of each conference.I know I am. We make those judgments based on the little we know and without a thorough examination of the current facts.
I guess we have to reeducate an entire footballing nation outside Broncoland, and the quicker the better.
I have so many friends some I haven't even used yet
by BlobTheMagnificent on Nov 6, 2009 12:53 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Fascinating ... but irrelevant
If the players were basically the same … the coach was the same … the schedule the same … then you would have a case. I am not saying that McDaniels is better than Shanahan or that Orton is better than Cutler … but I am saying that there has been a lot of change. It is what it is.
by Hank44 on Nov 5, 2009 10:04 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
It does appear you signed on ...
You signed up today (November 5) so that you could post this article … show a little character please … sign up, interact and establish yourself in the community. The troll accusations seem to have substance.
by Hank44 on Nov 5, 2009 10:12 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the welcome
I have interacted with the community just not on this site yet. I don’t follow the Broncos closely so I don’t show up to post about a team I know little about. Because PIT is playing DEN this week and because we had a bye week and because I had some time off from work and because there has been some legitimate trolling of the Steelers site, I decided to do some research.
Clearly your definition of trolling and mine differ. I would define a troll as somebody who showed up making outlandish comments based merely on opinion. A troll would contribute such incredible insight along the lines of “Donkeys suck!” “Our coach is better than your coach!” “Steelers rule!” blah, blah blah.
Clearly your opinion is that anybody who shows up during the week of a game is a troll no matter what they bring to the table. I haven’t belittled you personally because I find that type of innane behavior cowardly and childish. The only negative words I recall using in my orig post are that I thought the stretch run results of your team over the past decade has been pathetic and that a 23-29 record after the perennial quick starts was dismal. Do you disagree? Are you happy with the second half of the season performances your team has put up over the course of the last decade?
I guess I’m a troll because I dared to doubt the legitimacy of the mighty rebuilt broncos franchise until they, gasp, actually prove it on the playing field for an entire season.
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 9:39 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Read what I posted
I said the accusations SEEM to have substance (although you said “CLEARLY” my opinion is that anybody who shows up – please read!)… I urged you to interact and establish yourself first. But you simply began with a fanpost on the day you signed up and failed to acknowledge (or even mention) in your “research” that the Broncos have a different coach and a different system in place in Denver. That is a FAIRLY significant factor to include or exclude in one’s “research”. It is not just an incidental bit of trivia. Yet you tell us that you “don’t see this year’s edition being any different than the faltering Bronco teams of the past decade”. That is like saying I deserve a big raise this year because it has happened in the past and ignoring the present economy. You say there is “historical precedent”. Yet, you failed to point out the “historical precedent” of the Steelers record against the Broncos. As a Bronco fan I would quickly say that what Denver has done against Pittsburgh in the past has no bearing on this year. Why? Different players … different coaches … different setting. No, your response to my post adds to the suspicion … it does not detract. You are not a troll because “you doubt the legitimacy of the mighty rebuilt broncos franchise” … I would probably say you are probably a troll because of the dripping sarcasm of that statement, the paragraph above it and the closing paragraphs of the original post.
As a side note … I think Monday’s game will be close. I am not expecting the Broncos to win. I am a fan but I recognize that the Steelers are a very good … yet unpredictable … team. I am also not expecting the Broncos to fade away this season. They will be there at the end.
by Hank44 on Nov 6, 2009 6:35 AM MST up reply actions 1 recs
My post
Has nothing to do with the MNF game that is about to be played. If it did then I would have freely admitted that Denver has an advantage historically as I did in a reply later in this thread.
I originally made the post on BTSC in response to the myriad trumpeting taking place over on that site in an attempt to temper their overzealous enthusiasm. Perhaps I should have cleaned it up a bit more before reposting it, but I didn’t. Therefore it is what it is.
And my response, much like your original reply does drip of sarcasm intentionally. Whether that makes me a troll or not is for you to decide. I’ve certainly been called worse. Most here put little to no stock in what has happened with this franchise recently. Why that’s certainly within their rights, I find it a bit shortsighted. By ignoring your past mistakes and mishaps and failing to admit they have occurred it is possible you will be setting yourself up to repeat the same failures.
I didn’t feel a need to address this year’s team in detail. For one, as already admitted, I do not closely follow the team closely, so coming over here and babbling about something I do not know much about would set me up for sure failure. On the other hand, looking up historical trends is relatively easy by nature. It is based in fact and real world results and does not call upon someone to have to accurately predict the future.
Finally, I will reiterate a recurring theme. UNTIL this year’s team continues producing on the field for the rest of the year, I am not going to be sold that all is “fixed” with the Broncos. That shouldn’t be that difficult to understand.
I also agree that this coming weeks game should be a good one. I don’t know who is going to win and don’t frequently make predictions. Good luck the rest of the year. If the Broncos prove they have turned the corner I will be sure to stop back, admit that I was wrong about this team, and eat my crow with a glass of kool aid.
by King Coebra on Nov 6, 2009 8:34 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I have one thing to say to a steeler fan..*BULL SH!T*
Go peedle your act somewhere else!
by bfree2bronc on Nov 5, 2009 10:24 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
That's two things. :)
Am looking forward to a difficult contest Monday night, and hope that both team’s fans can enjoy it.
"I believe the game is designed to reward the ones who hit the hardest. If you can't take it, you shouldn't play." Jack Lambert
by LongTimeSteelersFan on Nov 5, 2009 11:26 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
no doubt.
Hard to argue with fans with six championships.
Good Luck! (Not really.)
by precisiontint on Nov 5, 2009 11:56 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
2006
That is the one season that is scary at this point. I am sure we all remember that one. Dominant defense that gave up NFL record (I believe) least points to begin the season. After 6 games defense was giving up 7.33 points a game. Then gave up 34 points in next game and finished giving up 26 points a game for the last 10 games. The current trend is a little unsettling, Defense has given up 7, 6, 3, 10, 17, 23, then 30 points. That trend needs to be reversed starting Monday night.
Of course as pointed out by other fans, history favors Denver against the Steelers and the Steelers are doing what most teams that are about to lose to Denver do. They are spending the entire week talking about and worry about playing at altitude.
by AKfan on Nov 5, 2009 12:19 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Maybe more fair to compare new England record versus steelers
Since 2002 (I’m using that time since any earlier probably wouldn’t include experience for McD), the Patriots have won 5 of 7. Since McD is using the same system and has a history of beating the Steelers, perhaps we should use that historical perspective. It’s no more illogical than your comparison. this years team (which has had a massive overhaul of personnel at coaching, defense, and offensive scheme) is an unknown. It’s like comparing the Titans tendencies with that of the Oilers of the past to look for trends.
by NDbronco on Nov 5, 2009 12:30 PM MST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
It might be
The Broncos have had solid success against the Steelers. So have the Patriots. It doesn’t bother me to admit that we have struggled against either team. I do think your comparison would hold more water, though, if the Broncos had Brady at QB, Welker and Moss at WR and a team full of multiyear champions on your roster. Was there a trade that I missed?
As to your reach in comparing the Titans to the Oilers, let’s try to be reasonable. We’re talking about a gap of how many years between the Oilers and the Titans? Whereas I am comparing this years Broncos team to last years and all the years immediately preceding it.
I haven’t once stated the Steelers are superior to the Broncos. I haven’t made a prediction for this week’s upcoming game. I don’t know who will win. I hope PIT wins, but you are right. Historically PIT struggles with the Broncos. Of course PIT has also finished 39-8 (38-4 if you discount 2007) down the stretch over the past five seasons with an 8-2 postseason record. Whatever that means.
by King Coebra on Nov 5, 2009 9:58 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Luck
Time will tell if the comparisons to previous year’s hold any water. As I already stated, should the Broncos regain their previous form and finish the season strong I will be back to admit I was wrong and to give credit where credit is due. Not to mention feast on a little crow and kool aid. There is still a lot of football to be played this season and the remaining schedule does not appear to be as daunting as the schedule already completed.
I appreciated the lively discussion. You folks came up with a lot of reasons to think that this season will end up differently than it has in recent history. Time will tell if those theories hold up. I also appreciate the fact that the discussion remained civil for the most part. I am, however, curious if anybody has changed their mind about this season’s team and coaching staff based on the “offensive” performances the past two weeks? If anybody cares to chime in on that I’m all ears.
Lastly, good luck the rest of the season. I, for one, would love to see the Broncos meet up with the Patriots in the playoffs and give them yet another lesson. Peace.
by King Coebra on Nov 10, 2009 9:12 AM MST reply actions 0 recs

by 



























