Broncos add Ty Law, Waive CB Jack Williams
The Denver Broncos on Saturday signed five-time Pro Bowl cornerback Ty Law and waived cornerback Jack Williams, it was announced.
Law (5-foot-11, 200 pounds) is a 15th-year veteran who has played for the New York Jets (2008, ‘05), Kansas City (2006-07) and New England (1995-2004). He entered the NFL with the Patriots as the 23rd overall pick in the 1995 NFL Draft from the University of Michigan.
Named to the Pro Bowl four times with the Patriots (1998, 2001-03) and once with the Jets (2005), Law owns three Super Bowl rings from his time with New England (2001, ‘03-04). He has appeared in 196 career regular-season games (187 starts), totaling 835 tackles (699 solo), five sacks (33 yds.), 52 interceptions (791 yds., 7 TDs), 164 pass breakups, seven forced fumbles and five fumble recoveries.
In the playoffs, Law has started 13 career games, including three Super Bowls. He has posted 55 tackles (47 solo), six interceptions (116 yds., 1 TD) and 14 pass breakups in the postseason for his career.
Law's 58 total interceptions (52 regular season, 6 postseason) for his career tie for 16th in NFL history and lead all active cornerbacks. His 52 career interceptions in regular-season play tie for 23rd in league annals and are the most by a current player at his position.
Law has started all 16 games in three of the last four seasons, including during the 2005 campaign with the Jets when he tied for the NFL lead with a career-high 10 interceptions to earn Pro Bowl accolades. Last year, he saw time in seven games (6 starts) with the Jets after joining the club midway through the season and had 19 tackles (14 solo), two pass breakups and one forced fumble.
A first-team All-American during his final year at Michigan, Law posted 154 tackles (120 solo) and six interceptions for his collegiate career. He earned Parade All-America honors at Aliquippa High School in Aliquippa, Pa., and was born on Feb. 10, 1974.
1 recs |
176 comments
|
Comments
wait wait wait..WHAT?!
waived jack?!! come on…i thought he looked good…we need good young talent for the future!
by march20 on Nov 7, 2009 9:16 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Waived???
Couldn’t we have landed at least mid-round draft pick for J MF WIlliams??
I’m really torn about this.
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Nov 7, 2009 9:16 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
One Word
WOW?!……..
Denver rookie head coach Josh McDaniels doesn't have a grasp on how to build a team." - John Clayton, April 23rd, 2009
by diviesti on Nov 7, 2009 9:18 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Guru, you've see Ty Law probably as much or more than any of us...
Can he still bring it? I trust McD, but I’m nervous.
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Nov 7, 2009 9:18 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Wow
I thought you knew that algebra was all razzamatazz. A Globetrotter always saves the good algebra for the final minutes.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Nov 7, 2009 9:19 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
One question, why wouldn't we waive Jarvis Moss?
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Nov 7, 2009 9:19 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Moss - Because he's doing a great job in a needed area
Jarvis Moss is in a place that no NFL player wants to be. He’s the best player that we have on the ‘ghost team’ – the group that creates the looks and tendencies of the opposing defense each week. Those guys are more important than most fans are aware – their abilities to take on the characteristics of the D that we’ll play may make a difference in the games that we play each week. In the best of all worlds,they are also players that you have confidence can come in and step up if your starters go down. He’s getting a lot of recognition for those qualities right now – more power to him.
As far as Jack – his effectiveness seemed to be fading over the past few weeks. Perhaps he’s not taking coaching well. Nolan, Ed Donatell and Josh McD are making an informed decision on a player who was, to be honest, leftover from the Shanahan era and less than impressive last year as well as more recently. Welcome, Ty Law!
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 7, 2009 11:21 AM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I guess I don't see it quite like that
My feeling is the only reason Moss is on the team as opposed to Crowder is the money we would of had to pay him if we cut him. I don’t have the confidence if our starters and backups go down that Moss would do anything to impress. He is a third stringer that doesn’t suit up, I rather have depth in the cB position with Williams because it is not like I would expect the likes of 30+ year old corners to stay heathly through the season. And Law will be coming in cold, I would like to have some depth in case he pulls a hammy or something.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Nov 7, 2009 2:36 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
yikes
Young jedi thinks he will win a superbowl this year LOL!
"3 and Out Baby" I ride the short bus!
by scottwchicago on Nov 7, 2009 9:21 AM MST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Other question, did Jack Williams play on ST, I doubt Ty Law will play any ST
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Nov 7, 2009 9:21 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Yes, he did play special teams
he had five special teams tackles last year and only two so far this year, so I don’t think he is special teams gold like Bruton, Woodyard, McBath and Larsen (two ST tackles in his one game already). He did, however, recover that fumble of Royal’s on the punt return.
I think that with Larsen back, Williams spot on the special teams became a bit more expendable.
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on Nov 7, 2009 11:10 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow! Jack Williamst isn't playing for us anymore?! What's up with this move?
"When you put on that jersey, the name on the front is more important than the name on the back." - "Miracle".
"Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else." - Vince Lombardi.
by broncoholic on Nov 7, 2009 9:24 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Not too surprised, I guess
It’s McDaniels and we know that he doesn’t mince words or actions and this really sends a message to the team that he wants to win now and will get rid of a pretty damn good nickel corner to make this team great in 2009-10.
I liked Jack and I would have rather seen a wideout or Jarvis get cut but I’ve got to have faith in McD. I think it’s great that he is trying to win now and will make the moves to do so. I hope it continues to motivate Alphonso.
The Slipper Still Fits - SB Nation's home for the Gonzaga Bulldogs!
Formerly BuffZag
Bol Kong for President!
by Zach Bell on Nov 7, 2009 9:24 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Not to beat a dead horse, but what is to stop Pittsburgh from claiming
Williams off waivers and getting an extra DB who knows our game plan?
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Nov 7, 2009 9:25 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Do they got to wait 3 day's like fantasy, lol
Denver rookie head coach Josh McDaniels doesn't have a grasp on how to build a team." - John Clayton, April 23rd, 2009
by diviesti on Nov 7, 2009 9:30 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
The waiver wire is 24 Hours
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
by KaptainKirk on Nov 7, 2009 11:01 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d think the Steelers are confident enough in their game plan (especially having had 2 weeks to prepare) that they feel they can win without messing up their roster by releasing someone to pick up Williams. As you can see by the Broncos’ move (and by looking at the roster), it’s not always easy to find someone to get rid of.
formerly known around these parts as nycbroncosfan
by Douglas A. Lee on Nov 7, 2009 9:55 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
Who would we cut, one of the 2 rookie corners that we drafted this year, who have been through our training camp, and are starting to grasp our schemes?
"I believe the game is designed to reward the ones who hit the hardest. If you can't take it, you shouldn't play." Jack Lambert
by LongTimeSteelersFan on Nov 7, 2009 10:50 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Can Pittsburgh claim Williams?
They can try, but they are probably last in line with their record from last year. That is, if all 31 teams claim him, Detroit gets him.
IT is, and it's impossible for IT not to be.
Parmenides (5th Century B. C. Greek)
by bradley on Nov 7, 2009 11:19 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point, bradley
The other reason is simple – JM doesn’t know much that LeBeau doesn’t know already. In addition to his masterful applications of the zone blitz defense, LeBeau is another of the masters of film. He doesn’t need Williams to help him out.
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 7, 2009 11:23 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Great point, Doc
IT is, and it's impossible for IT not to be.
Parmenides (5th Century B. C. Greek)
by bradley on Nov 7, 2009 11:24 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm cornfussed!
Tough times don't last.......Only tough people!
by moorebroncos on Nov 7, 2009 9:33 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
STRANGE!
The honest truth is that I thought it would be Hillis, not Williams.
I guess (still trying to figure this out) this says two things:
1) McD wants to win it all right now. You don’t make this move otherwise because JMFW would have had trade value.
2)Alphonso Smith is returning kicks again.
3) McD must see something on tape from Law (and in NE) to convince him this is the right move. Perhaps he things Law’s knowledge of WRs in the AFC will help in that nickel
"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."
by TJ Johnson on Nov 7, 2009 9:38 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Jack stepped up this year
when Zo was struggling, but he’s an average player at the end of the day. His openness on Twitter is why so many of you are overrating him and feigning disdain. He’s a cool human being, but I trust the personnel prowess of this front office.
by ELGee on Nov 7, 2009 9:39 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
player appraisals by fans
The impression that fans have of players is often based on grapevine induced enthusiam. A few plays can create an impression that is then shared, and the resultant opinion is the product of our willingness to believe the best about a player, which is a groupthink process rather than a critical examination of the player’s ability & performance.
I had been hearing bad things about Williams lately from a knowledgeable source but I chose to hope for the ‘best’ outcome, which I define as improvement by him. However, as we saw in Cutlergate, it’s a common tendency for fans to become emotionally attached to players and not be objective about their performance. We quite literally like them and aren’t objective regarding their performance.
Cutting that player is always a shock to fans. But the question should be what gave rise to that inflated appraisal? Has that player consistently demonstrated a high level of performance? I can think of one good game by Williams but “one game” points to the problem. What did he do all last season and the other six games this season? Even Webster made some big plays, it was the rest of his performance that was problematic.
no goats, no glory.
by Colinski on Nov 7, 2009 12:10 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly Colinski and the primary reason why we shouldn't get too attached to certain players.
I am attached to the team as a whole not one individual that I like or admire. Team first, all others get in line.
by bfree2bronc on Nov 7, 2009 12:16 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Nicknames
We overlook even more when they get a catchy nickname, like “MF”
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 12:19 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
MoFo will probably get picked up by somebody in need of a nickle db.
Just like Kerns caught on with Tennessee.
by bfree2bronc on Nov 7, 2009 12:21 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
we colts
really want him
As long as we have Peyton we will always have a chance to win.
by skywalker on Nov 7, 2009 3:24 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Do you know if...
the Colts tried to get Ty Law?
He felt like the man that drew the first circle. Simple, and perfect.
From The Big Law, by Chuck Logan
by bradley on Nov 7, 2009 4:39 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Patriots & Browns
Expressed some interest.
Here’s a good LINK regarding recent Ty Law history. Seems his biggest problem in recent years have been hamstring and foot injuries.
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 4:43 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
That is a wise observation Colinski
(Raises Hand) Guilty.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
by KaptainKirk on Nov 7, 2009 10:42 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Guilty?!?
Nah, I won’t give up the attachment to players. Let the coaches and, particularly, personnel guys make the cold, fully-informed decisions: I’m grateful for them.
But my wife likes Orton (uh, not that way I hope); the first Denver QB for whom this has been true. I’m grateful for her finding this, or any other reason, to be interested. So I won’t disdain player attachments, no way.
Come on, most of us feel fatherly or motherly towards BMarsh – otherwise he might just be another (reformed on again-off again) prima donna WR. But since we care about him as a person, his emotion rings true when he stomps down the sideline after clawing his way out of hell this off-season.
Guilty?
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Nov 7, 2009 11:11 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I meant this part Pos
The impression that fans have of players is often based on grapevine induced enthusiam. A few plays can create an impression that is then shared, and the resultant opinion is the product of our willingness to believe the best about a player, which is a groupthink process rather than a critical examination of the player’s ability & performance.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
by KaptainKirk on Nov 8, 2009 12:08 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
You're right, of course Kaptain
but “groupthink” is a pretty pejorative term for an inevitable human inclination: we love the Broncos, therefore we will love (perhaps not as strongly) all the component parts of the Broncos. Hard to get over that.
Colinksi’s paragraph on how we reach our “impressions” is excellent, though. I’m just not sure its a bad thing! We are supporters of a team – honesty is good, but only up until it gets in the way of supporting the team!
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Nov 8, 2009 8:30 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Here is my question
What has Jack done this year? I know he has made a few good plays, but it seems like he, and Smith, haven’t been getting it done as well as the rest of the DB’s, and I get the impression this is a clear sign that Smith, while hopefully the future, still is a work in progress
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Nov 7, 2009 9:41 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't help that anybody opposite Champ gets
100% of the targets.
by ELGee on Nov 7, 2009 9:41 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
agree, But
that doesn’t mean you should have an inexperienced player back there, IMO
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Nov 7, 2009 9:47 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Jack
Dont know everything that goes on at the dove but Jack has looked horrible our last 2 games. Vincent Jackson scored on him in the charger game, Jack wasnt even close. I know Vincent has done that 2 a lot of people and I was wondering myself why Jack was matched up against him but still. Last week K. Washington ate him up on several key 3rd down situations and he wasnt even close. Have to trust McD on this one boys and girls he obviously knows more than we do.
by johnnyurrotten on Nov 7, 2009 11:27 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Jack Williams
4th round draft pick by the Broncos in 2008 out of Kent State. 5’9", 183 lbs, 4.32-40. Often injured in college. Was battling illness this week and, if I remember correctly, had been injured earlier this season.
Negatives: Has good body lean and upper-body muscle tone, but is not the biggest and he struggles to ward off bigger blockers when working in run force…Could use additional upper-body bulk, but more weight could impact his overall quickness…Was durable until recently, battling ankle and shoulder problems throughout 2007 (shoulder still might not be fully recovered)…Plays defensive “halfback” in the Golden Flashes’ system, spending more time in the zone and attacking the ball than in man coverage…Appears to possess only adequate man-coverage skills, as he has the speed to run stride for stride with the receiver, but lacks good technique, as he doesn’t always use his hands effectively in attempts to reroute and is susceptible to double moves…His feet are often little tangled at the top of routes in man coverage, and he bails early on deep backpedals (does show good hips to turn and run, though)…Willing, but shows only adequate ability in run support, as he doesn’t separate from blockers well (needs to be more active using his hands and must learn that it is best to slip and avoid bigger blockers)…Struggles without the size needed to check elite receivers and while in run support, where he struggles to disengage when blockers get into his body …Sometimes gets overconfident with his foot speed, allowing a big cushion underneath and he doesn’t have the second gear to recover quickly when his man gets behind him…Has had good success on the cornerback blitz at this level of competition, but will likely get engulfed by blockers at the next level (must show better avoidance skills).
Jack is a decent backup CB. Very good special teams coverage player. Lacks the size and strength to beat even an average blocker. Will gamble at times to make the big play.
I confess that I am surprised the Broncos waived him. Not to the degree that I disagree with the decision. Only that I am surprised given that other roster players could have been the choice. On the other hand … we picked up a CB and waived a CB. Law is bigger and more experienced than Williams. So maybe he has lost a step, Law is still a viable player.
As for Alphonso – he is still a work in progress and has shown flashes of brilliance. Injuries have slowed his progress. And I have been a bit disappointed with his progress.
MAYBE we could have gotten trade value for Williams. But for who? Or what? It is a “water over the bridge” argument now.
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 9:46 AM MST reply actions 1 recs
This is definitely a surprise to everybody including me.
Goes to show you how much we really know about the mind of an nfl head coach! LOL
by bfree2bronc on Nov 7, 2009 9:49 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
To true bfree!
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
by KaptainKirk on Nov 7, 2009 11:02 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
denverbroncos : Back out at Dove Valley. Josh McDaniels press conference scheduled for 10 a.m. Mountain. Will help answer your questions about Law/Williams
by Calibroncoboy on Nov 7, 2009 9:52 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
also from denverbroncos twitter: I saw him in the locker room earlier this wk and he looked very, very ill.
Well maybe mcd wants to win now…..as in THIS week. however i doubt u cut a player b/c hes sick for one week
by Calibroncoboy on Nov 7, 2009 9:54 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Something doesn't add up...
I have a feeling this was more about replacing Jack Williams than about anything else. They may have just wanted him off the team for whatever reason. If this was about simply adding depth or trying to get better at nickle, they could have kept him and cut someone like Moss or Lloyd. It’s hard to speculate too much because we’re not in the building obviously, but I just have to think that the reason this went down was JMFW. Otherwise, it just doesn’t make sense.
by ButteBronco on Nov 7, 2009 10:01 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand not cutting Moss
he is the highest paid practice squad player…EVER.
by Sneaky Sean on Nov 7, 2009 10:59 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
See Emmet's point above
IT is, and it's impossible for IT not to be.
Parmenides (5th Century B. C. Greek)
by bradley on Nov 7, 2009 11:25 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm wonder if McDaniels sees a Julius Peppers type play out of Moss?
Maybe he is being conditioned just for that since we have seen him play much lately. Down the stretch a player that the other teams haven’t really had a chance to plan against? Don’t know, but something is cooking because I can smell the bacon frying.
by bfree2bronc on Nov 7, 2009 12:12 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
The only thing I don't like about this
…is that it could affect team chemistry.
Plus, there’s probably more to this story than what we now know.
by JeffG on Nov 7, 2009 10:01 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Chemistry among the twitter crew
that is mostly scrubs. Champ and Dawkins will snap them out of it.
by ELGee on Nov 7, 2009 10:18 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
This is a harsh business...
From Lindsey Jones’ Twitter, “Ty Law has Jack Williams’ old locker – and his number, too: No. 26.”
by ButteBronco on Nov 7, 2009 10:14 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Jack Stats
i tried to copy from one of the sites…but it wont do a table thingie…what i saw was no interceptions and…like…5 defensed passes…and some tackles (32 for his career – so far)
smith has 8 tackles and 2 passed defensed…pretty much came in his first two games?
soooooo…its not like he is champ
MHR...and proud of it!
by MHRsGirl on Nov 7, 2009 10:17 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Strange...
There has to be something else going on here. Jack has looked very good this year…
by aLuffabo on Nov 7, 2009 10:20 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Yes and No
I agree that “someting else is going on here.” But respectfully Jack has not looked very good this year. If anything he has looked good at times. But adding “very” is too high praise for him.
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 10:35 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
+1...whats going on is that McD wants to win now, and last weekends game was a wake up call. He wants more veteran leadership and he has brought in a Super Bowl winner. STOKED!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Nov 7, 2009 10:39 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Boydy...I am glad you said this about Berger too!:-)!!!!!
"Wait, let me explain something to you...I'm the Dude. So, that's what you call me. You know, that, or 'His Dudeness,' or 'Duder,' or 'El Duderino,' if you're not into the whole brevity thing."
by TJ Johnson on Nov 7, 2009 11:00 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I have STRONG reservations about Berger...
SLow release, no real power or distance.
As I have said hope I am wrong with Berger but he looked TERRIBLE against Baltimore. I understand about net, but when kicking from your 20-30 yard line I want some distance…..not just fair catches for a net of 26!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Nov 7, 2009 11:05 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Another good point
TWO super bowl winners in one week. Berger & Law = versatility, experience, etc. Not bad at all. AND we may have prevented the Colts from picking up Law. What did we give up? A 4th rounder from 2008 who was always trying for the “big play” instead of doing his job.
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 11:19 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Guys, lets not over react....
We all said Josh Bell looked good last year.
I liked JMFW but he is not capable of holding Ty Law’s jock strap….not even now.
I support this move.
You guys want to write off Jarvis Moss, but they are treating him like Chris Baker….a player with MAD potential for the future.
I am sorry to see him go, but welcome Law with open arms. We just got that much nastier in the back field!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Nov 7, 2009 10:36 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
It seems that DE's are more valuable to stockpile
that DB’s. Since it takes a couple years investment to develop. Perhaps Jarvis is getting a little more time.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
by KaptainKirk on Nov 7, 2009 11:06 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
And
With good coaching, finally, from Nunelly and Martindale, Jarvis just might blossom. The saw something there. I’ve been pulling for him, because I hate to see guys fail.
by BroncosBassist on Nov 7, 2009 7:02 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
strange happenings
I will start by saying I am happy it was not hillis but I thought jack had improved and was playing about as well as smith but the problem is he is too much like smith and the broncos are obviously more invested in smith and do not really need jack around for comparison because of the way we acquired smith. I thought we had players that had not played and probably will not like moss who should have been cut,
by rimrock on Nov 7, 2009 10:37 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
also
Fonzis a Josh pick Jacks a Mike pick simple enough.
by johnnyurrotten on Nov 7, 2009 11:31 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Not that simple
Smith is a better player. That’s where the simplicity comes in.
He’s been slowed by an ankle injury, but last week, eg., he blew up a screen pass that allowed Woodyard to make a tackle for a 4-yard loss.
by JeffG on Nov 7, 2009 11:34 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Should have cut Lloyd instead.
Just my opinion. Williams will be snapped up by the Colts if no one else grabs him first.
IT is, and it's impossible for IT not to be.
Parmenides (5th Century B. C. Greek)
by bradley on Nov 7, 2009 10:42 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Good point
The Colts lost Jackson and Sanders. Who would we rather see on the Colts’ D? Ty Law or Jack Williams?
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 10:52 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
That's an interesting point
I wonder if the Colts were talking to Law. (They have also lost CB Kelvin Hayden for the season.)
IT is, and it's impossible for IT not to be.
Parmenides (5th Century B. C. Greek)
by bradley on Nov 7, 2009 10:55 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
No question Ty Law
Are you comfortable with Payton Manning sitting in a room finding everything that Jack Williams knows about Mike Nolan’s defense? That is a very legitimate risk of this move. Giving a substantial strategic advantage to the smartest qb in the league who the Broncos will soon be playing and possibly will play in the playoffs.
Whoever Jack WiIliams eventually signs with will soon be picking his mind about Mike Nolan’s defense.
by AKfan on Nov 7, 2009 3:45 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely
Game strategies change every week. I think there is way too much credit given someone “knowing” another team’s tendencies. It really boils down to execution on game day. That’s why there is no question in my mind that I would rather have Ty Law on the Broncos because he is consistent and the inconsistent Jack Williams on the Colts.
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 3:48 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I liked him
but I think people are overrating JW a but here. Just my opinion.
He might’ve been the Randy Hilliard of this year’s Broncos. ;-)
Still, my first reaction to the news was… (abbreviated for family viewing) “MF!”
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Nov 7, 2009 10:45 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
WOW......................
So much for getting younger in the secondary…………
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 7, 2009 10:51 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Btw if someone is going to pick up Jack Williams
I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s the Colts. Their secondary has been decimated by injuries this month.
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Nov 7, 2009 10:53 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
I was surprised by this move
Yesterday when I heard that Law was joining the team I was very surprised but felt assured because I have faith McD knows whether or not he can contribute to the team. It was saddening to see Williams cut, because I thought he really had stepped up his game this season. However, I did notice prior to this transaction that he did have a bit of trouble against the Ravens, but I never thought his job was in jeopardy.
When thinking about it, it must be because McD knows Law is the type of player who will hold himself accountable and do his job. It seemed like Williams was somewhat of a hit or miss. Anyways, I hope Williams can use this ordeal to his advantage by learning a thing or two. Best wishes Jack and thanks for swinging for the fences.
If we cannot find a way, we will make a new one. -Hannibal
by AvalancheRescueDog on Nov 7, 2009 11:04 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
I am a little curious
We have a great Secondary back there and we just sold Jack down the river to win now. I am all for winning now but I am more for consistency. Signing a 35 yr old cornerback and dumping a 24 yr old cornerback isn’t how I would do it. I am not the coach I dont know what has been done out there in practice, but if anything, Williams potential was big and he was coachable! A Confusing move and one that screams “We need it this year” imo. Don’t mind signing Ty Law but the price (personnel-wise) is a little steep for me.
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown
by Jon Tollerud on Nov 7, 2009 11:05 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't have said it better myself.
totally agree, Jon.
IT is, and it's impossible for IT not to be.
Parmenides (5th Century B. C. Greek)
by bradley on Nov 7, 2009 11:22 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree as well
See my post below.
"All credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses." Friedrich Nietzsche
by Horsepower on Nov 7, 2009 11:57 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Was it a win-now thing
or did McD simply evaluate JW’s potential differently than we did? Don’t forget that he coached the secondary in New England before he moved to offense.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Nov 7, 2009 12:15 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I understand
and there is a lot I am not seeing I am sure. But to me a young guy who is coachable is desired over a guy who has a few left in the tank. My question is are we up for addressing the secondary in the draft again? I mean thats a lot of picks in the back field the last three years with minimal done to the front seven and on offense we need a few picks as well.
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown
by Jon Tollerud on Nov 7, 2009 2:20 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Ahhh...but was he "coachable"
That was my major issue with Williams. He did not seem to be improving with coaching. He was still the “home run hitter” looking for the big play instead of the solid, consistent player you could count on.
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 2:32 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Jack Williams MAYBE just aint that good....I am trusting the coaches on this one. I was surprised he was kept ahead of Josh Bell!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Nov 7, 2009 3:43 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Unless the 35 year old CB can cover better than the 24 yr old
and you have Alphonso Smith and another draft coming up which you see players you like. Jack Williams had a good vibe with the fans but the Pats and Ravens toasted him. We know McDaniels and Nolan well enough to know….if our arguments for Jack Williams were accurate ….. he would still be here. He isn’t.
I would hope you would support who we are. Not, who we are not. Coach Norman Dale "Hoosiers"
by dmitchell624 on Nov 7, 2009 3:49 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
True
it was a gut reaction
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown
by Jon Tollerud on Nov 7, 2009 4:27 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Too Harsh
Jon, it is too harsh to say the Broncos sold Jack down the river.
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 3:53 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
my words were slightly reactionary
sorry I meant we let him go in a win now move. thats my concern
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown
by Jon Tollerud on Nov 7, 2009 4:25 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I see what you mean
However, I don’t think “win now” is a bad move. We can still use FA & the draft to improve in years to come.
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 4:29 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah my worry is very simple
did we cut a guy who will have a Champ Bailey like Career? did we just let a guy walk that could have done great things in Denver? Time will tell
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown
by Jon Tollerud on Nov 7, 2009 4:31 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Less of a surprise when you look at 3rd wide receiver success recently
Somewhere this morning in MHR or from horse tracks I was reading the stats on 3rd wide receivers for the last several games esp Pats and Balt. and how poorly Denver defended them. Pittsburg has also done well with their third receiver packages. I think they have the number of players they want in their other groups so this cut had to come from DB’s. McD loves Safety versitility esp with the lower number of cover LB’s in a 3/4 so it had to be a CB. After sending a No 1 to get Smith he wasn’t going anywhere so the only choice was the old regimes 4th round pick of Williams. I don’t think this was just a “win now” decision either. I don’t think they feel Williams can make it on this team and that he is not a future building block at CB.
by mauibroncofan on Nov 7, 2009 11:23 AM MST reply actions 2 recs
+1
I agree with this assessment. JMFW was good for depth at corner, but like someone above said, he can’t compare with Ty Law.
Also, re the future, we still have a full stable of young and potent DBs; AND there will be a strong pool of high-potential CBs in the 2010 Draft (http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/article/2009-09-02/2010-draft-watch-top-10-cornerbacks).
"A man can fail, but he is not a failure until he blames someone else." J. Paul Getty
by SteveAssassin on Nov 7, 2009 2:25 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Ty Law
He’s a year younger than bdawk and I don’t think anybody here would complain about weapon x. He’s got the experience and should fit in nicely in the nickel, and after this last offseason I learned to keep my mouth shut about mcd’s moves and decisions now that we’re 6-1! Go Broncos!!
by tulsabroncofan on Nov 7, 2009 11:23 AM MST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
One rough game
I liked what I saw from Jack this year, but I admit I saw him get beat a couple of times against the Ravens. One tough game and a young player is looking for a new job. Its tough to lose one of your up and coming young players. I have remarked a few times this year that one good thing about our 30+ secondary was the young talent right behind it, but that’s a little less true now. But one thought I had making that better: it seems in todays NFL there is always one or two good veteran players left unsigned near midseason that can still play but seem to be holding out for the “right” team, or possibly just aren’t sure if they have enough left to get through a whole season. Maybe McD can make a similar move in future years to keep us stocked with right now talent. We’ll see how this one works out for us. We’ll miss you Jack!
Indescision is the key to flexibility
by akbroncosfan on Nov 7, 2009 11:28 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
But remember ...
WE have McBath and Bruton as wel, and Josh Barrett. McBath can play corner as well. We have plenty of youth in the backfield, and will fill up at CB in the draft.
Jack was just a watered down version of the Phonz so that made him expendable.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Nov 7, 2009 11:36 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Just for the sake of argument
I trust McD, but at this rate, if Wesley Woodyard gets the flu, are we signing Derrick Brooks?
I hope, that in a few weeks we’ll see more clearly why this move was necessary. Perhaps JMFW had a more serious illness.
"All credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses." Friedrich Nietzsche
by Horsepower on Nov 7, 2009 11:36 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Breaking down film each week
I saw both very good and awfully bad from Jack. One of the highlights of McD’s scheme is consistency. Jack hasn’t matched that.
One thing that I’m very clear on – Josh McD isn’t making a sudden move that hasn’t been considered from a variety of viewpoints. This may have caught the fans by surprise, but it didn’t just happen because Williams was exposed by Baltimore. That probably was the icing on the cake, but in all fairness – we didn’t sell JM down the river in a ‘win now’ quest and it isn’t because someone else drafted him – see our O line, DJ Williams, etc. Obviously, if he hasn’t stayed, there is something in his game that doesn’t fit the new Broncos. Something that he’s doing isn’t up to current Broncos standards. Actually, I like that. Getting better all the time appeals to me
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 7, 2009 11:37 AM MST reply actions 3 recs
re: "consistency"
You’ve put your finger on it, Emmett.
Even though it’s dis-likable to many, I can only conclude that there was a performance shortcoming that led to his being cut.
Fans become enamored with players and resist the idea — even though it’s the obvious explanation — that poor performance is the sole, or predominant, reason behind a player being cut.
A decision was reached after the cumulative evidence made that decision necessary. Also, Donatell and Nolan had a voice in that decision and it would be an error to assume that McDaniels pulled the trigger without input.
I stated previously that CB would be a target in the upcoming draft, and this news reinforces that assessment. Our success in the first six games has tended to closedown analysis on how we can, and need, to improve, although not among the staff. The team is far from a finished product. And the tendency to keep problems, while hoping to fix them through incremental change or half-solutions, is what doomed the teams at the end of the Shanahan era.
Fixing problems is a very proactive process, even though it’s usually seen as a reactive step. Not only is it not true that “you shouldn’t try to fix what isn’t broken,” and — of course — we don’t know that it wasn’t, but “why wait till it is broken?” A little foresight goes a long ways towards preventing future problems, which is far better than being unprepared when the eventual finally occurs. Wishful thinking led to rosy prospection regarding Williams. I’d like to know that we’re prepared for when Bailey is done playing. It’s a choice between what’s currently inadequate and availing ourselves of an actual solution, in the 2010 draft. Law is obviously a temporary solution to tide us through until we find Bailey and Goodman’s successors.
no goats, no glory.
by Colinski on Nov 7, 2009 2:18 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Need vs BPA
I always thought you were a BPA kinda guy. Now you think we are going to"target" a CB?
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 2:41 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
If you have two guys equally rated
…and one of them is a CB…
by JeffG on Nov 7, 2009 2:54 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
BPA v. Need
I came to the conclusion that CB would be ‘higher’ on our list come draft day for a few reasons — one, they’re plentiful; two, we’re alone in in NFL in carrying 4 CBs (so it’s a workable solution); three, we’re still looking for future starters (and even before Williams was cut); and four, CB is becoming an impact position that’s in demand.
BPA and need are misunderstood, and they’re often dichotomized (a black-and-white fallacy). I’ve tried to explain this subject though a utility function, which wed the two concepts, but it’s still a confusing subject.
What’s pertinent to the ‘Williams cut’ issue is that he wasn’t going to become the future at CB, IMO. Keeping him would have been a ‘half-solution," a less than satisfactory solution that obstructs a true solution. Finding our future CBs was important, and waiting wasn’t an option since time was running out.
My usage of the term “targeting” is easily misunderstood. I lacked a better term, and I realized it at the time. I’m saying that we will (or should, could, etc.) be heavily scrutinizing the CB crop. Partly this is because of needs but it’s partly because there’s a confluence of need and BPA in the 2010 crop. I prefer the term ‘impact’ lately since it conveys a slightly different idea. A good RB (yes, even one more) could have an impact, and that’s despite it not being a need area. I’ve suggested Jahvid Best because he compliments our current backs and is a KR, playmaker type that could contribute. I’ve also suggested Donovan Warren as a possible 2nd round pick. Position is hardly an unimportant consideration but it’s only a part of a draft selection decision. However, positional considerations are still important, and I’d strongly consider drafting Arthur Jones or Jared Odrick, as I’ve said, but I’d consider drafting them even if we were in better shape on the DL.
no goats, no glory.
by Colinski on Nov 7, 2009 5:07 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I think I understand
You advocate a modified bpa where positional need(s) is/are a factor. Makes sense to me.
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 7:10 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
mathematical functions V. the english language
Draft selections are by definition a player who can better help the team, but that utility function doesn’t translate well into the stereotypical categories of “need” and “Best-Player-Available.” A few positions won’t be of great interest to us but it’s hard to predict in advance will have greater utility. We declined to pick a NT in the last draft although there were a few available, but it’s not because it wasn’t a need. The dilemma is called a Keynesian Beauty Contest, in which the winners are the losers because they overpaid.
I define the needs of this team in nebulous terms. I’d like to see help at all three levels on defense and on the OL, and I’d consider a WR and RB if they can contribute something. The priorities would be DE, OL and offensive and defensive playmakers, but it’s easier to say who I wouldn’t consider. The truth is that position is somewhat less important than a certain kind of player. I see a number of players in the next draft who appear to meet the general criterion of team player/good character, etc. The 2010 draft is particularly strong in DL34s and that’s what I’ve been focused on.
no goats, no glory.
by Colinski on Nov 7, 2009 8:21 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Belichik was just quoted as saying something he has always believed, something like “every player has a trade price.” I guarantee that McD believes this too (see Cutlergate), and ultimately, JMFW’s long-term potential (ie – trade price) doesn’t compare with getting Ty Law for a cool US$1 mio.
"A man can fail, but he is not a failure until he blames someone else." J. Paul Getty
by SteveAssassin on Nov 7, 2009 2:28 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't cut Jack Williams
Cut LAMONT JORDAN
by Adam Manter on Nov 7, 2009 11:46 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Jordan's the grinder that doesn't fumble.
We just haven’t had enough lead in the last couple of games to use him. He’s a tool we need down the road, you’ll see.
by bfree2bronc on Nov 7, 2009 12:38 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
No can do..
..the Broncos went 6-deep on the depth chart last year at RB…need all the ammo we can find there!
"A man can fail, but he is not a failure until he blames someone else." J. Paul Getty
by SteveAssassin on Nov 7, 2009 2:29 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
with all this controversy,
watch Ty get a pick-6 on monday…
"Really, I'm a high-motor guy. Tough, hard-nosed, a hard runner, can make you miss at times. And just competitive. I love to play the game and I bring that energy to my team. So, we'll see how that goes." - Knowshon Moreno
Knowshon Moreno=ROY
by stedtfeld on Nov 7, 2009 11:46 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
I sure hope so.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 7, 2009 1:22 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
And we win
And Berger downs every punt within the 15.
Actually all three of these things are possible, bordering on likely (except for the pick 6 which a lot more people have control over than the DB)
And their accomplishment would make for a nice, light mood come Monday around 9pm Pacific.
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Nov 7, 2009 11:23 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
"And Berger downs every punt within the 15."
Punt? We’ll be punting?
He felt like the man that drew the first circle. Simple, and perfect.
From The Big Law, by Chuck Logan
by bradley on Nov 8, 2009 6:32 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
haha, I'm with you.
I’m hoping we don’t see Berger except to hold extra points.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 8, 2009 8:11 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I get it
Surprised, but I get it.
The Broncos are deep at surplus DBs. A conventional dime would now have Phonz and McBath. They have Barrett to play the TE-smother. JMFW had fallen off recently. It looked to me like he blew an assignment or two (rather than simply failing to make a play) in San Diego. Williams was the least distinguished (and lowest-upside) of many faces in the crowd for pass defense and special teams. I’ve always felt that he’s shorter than his listed height, too.
Two other bonuses I see. Ty Law, whom rumor has it is very old, will see limited action and be able to preserve himself. And the team will have a collective flame lit under it — it’s hard to feel too secure when a guy getting lots of PT is shown the door.
by Chibronx on Nov 7, 2009 12:01 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Makes our team better
That’s always McD’s mantra…whatever makes the team better. This move does. Secondly, I think there’s a message here for the rest of the team and for the rest of the season. DO YOUR JOB.
Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll eat for a lifetime.
"Losing stinks" - Josh McDaniels
by azbroncomaniac on Nov 7, 2009 12:37 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
+1
"All by their heads, he places crowns."
by Tempestuous Binary on Nov 7, 2009 4:20 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
i am ok with this. its not like they dropped phonse.
by prototype on Nov 7, 2009 12:40 PM MST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
From Schefter on Twitter:
CB Ty Law signed a one-year, $800,000 deal that includes a $200,000 signing bonus and another potential $400,000 in incentives.
Bleeding Orange & Blue in The Netherlands
by BroncosNL on Nov 7, 2009 2:20 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
vet minimum
That’s the lowest possible salary (without incentives) — I believe. And because of the rule about vet minimum salaries he counts for only half that against the cap, even though the cap isn’t a consideration right now (although it’s possible that we saved some cap room for next year since William’s contract counts produces a bigger cap hit against this year now),
no goats, no glory.
by Colinski on Nov 7, 2009 2:37 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
He'll make as much this year as our QB
…if not more.
by JeffG on Nov 7, 2009 2:56 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Jack Williams salary
4-year contract
2008 – $745,200
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 3:35 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Colts
We want Williams. I was looking through the comments here and alot of you were soundin upset they let williams go instead of someone else. How has he done for you so far?
As long as we have Peyton we will always have a chance to win.
by skywalker on Nov 7, 2009 3:29 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
He's not a starter
So it’s not all bad for us. You guys need a db and Jack is a gamer.
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 3:38 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
We liked him but as you can also see
from reading the rest of the comments a lot of us feel he wasn’t a huge loss. Broncos have too many other good DBs waiting in the wings and Williams was really erratic. That said he has some upside, is young, and could help another team. Given the Colts injuries in the D backfield, I think he could help them.
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Nov 7, 2009 3:40 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
agree
Colts, get yourself some JMFW and I think you’ll be happy you did!
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Nov 7, 2009 5:07 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
About all I can learn from this...
is that I know diddly-squat about evaluating NFL players! I was very surprised also, because I shared the same assumption as most of you: that Jack “MF!” Williams was a good young DB. Well, what was I basing that on? Word of mouth. A couple of DP articles from training camp maybe.
My first reaction was that it must be something personal. Like drugs/alcohol, or an attitude problem, something like that.
I still think it’s either something like that, or the inconsistency problem others have mentioned. If no one picks him up, then I’d guess the former.
by ZooTown on Nov 7, 2009 4:18 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Not Me
I was not one of those who thought he was a good young DB. I thought he was inconsistent and was more interested in the “big play.” Really good tackler, good speed, he is an NFL player…but only a backup and a dangerous situational player both for and against us. He was not improving and thus he may be “uncoachable.” At least for us.
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 4:27 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow we really got some people on here that flip flop their opinions a lot
Before anyone heard this news your rarely read on this anything bad about Williams play. Yes he was a fan favorite but people are not completely blinded by that as some suggest. I also think a lot of people are talking up Ty Law. Yes he is a veteran and has lost a few steps the last few years. One poster above compared him to Dawkins which is just an ignorant comment. Yes Law brings veteran leadership but he is a shadow of his former self. There is a reason he has not signed until half way through the season. Also Pittsburgh 3rd WR is MIke Wallace and the kid has speed that JW could match. Ty Law cannot keep up with Mike Wallace. This is the first move of McDaniels that I question. I think a lot people are a selling Jack short and giving Ty Law too much praise. We will have to wait and see how he plays.
by gnarlybroncodude on Nov 7, 2009 4:49 PM MST reply actions 1 recs
How can you give a 3 time SB winner too much credit...
I am sorry Jack was released. He has upside but choice between one and the other is an easy one.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Nov 7, 2009 4:55 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Its not as easy as you make it out to be
Just because he has 3 SB rings does not mean he is the same player now. There is a huge reason he was not on a team at the beginning of the year and the reason was he is old and a shadow of his former self. People are talking Law up like he is the same player he was when he was winning those SB which is not accurate. I saw a few Jets games last year when he was on their squad and he got burned repeatedly. I normally agree with you on most stuff but not this subject. I have a feeling some people are going to be wishing we still had jack when we see Law get beat over and over again on monday night
by gnarlybroncodude on Nov 7, 2009 5:01 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta hope...
….that you are wrong and McD is right.
He felt like the man that drew the first circle. Simple, and perfect.
From The Big Law, by Chuck Logan
by bradley on Nov 7, 2009 5:17 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I will put experience and the veteran presence he brings over anything JMFW brings us......and he is MORE than good enough to play in nickel role!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Nov 7, 2009 5:29 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
If we use the premise that no one had picked him up
as a rule….we wouldn’t have Vonnie Holliday either
I would hope you would support who we are. Not, who we are not. Coach Norman Dale "Hoosiers"
by dmitchell624 on Nov 7, 2009 5:32 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
The difference between Holliday
and Law is Holliday has been consistent in his play over the last few years and Law has not. I hope I am wrong about Law but he is not the player he once was based on the last few seasons.
by gnarlybroncodude on Nov 7, 2009 5:48 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus
Holliday had had offers from other teams (as I recall) but not for enough money, in Holliday’s opinion. Law signed for much leass.
He felt like the man that drew the first circle. Simple, and perfect.
From The Big Law, by Chuck Logan
by bradley on Nov 8, 2009 6:34 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
we have to agree to disagree
but you are talking him up big time
by gnarlybroncodude on Nov 7, 2009 5:50 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
So you dont think he can come in and make a positive difference as:
- A nickel.
- A team leader.
- A mentor.
Thats all I am saying.
I look at as this: Jack vs Ty as a NICKEL CB in our defense…who do you take?
Thanks s always Gnarly!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Nov 7, 2009 6:07 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't it not quite that simple anyway?
I think Williams was down to a dime back, not a nickel. It’ll be between Law and Phonso Smith, with McBath, Bruton and co adding depth. Williams had moved way down on the DB depth chart after last week. Not even sure Law will be the nickel on Monday since he’s had little time to get ready. But again I’m even more sure it wouldn’t have been JMFW.
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Nov 7, 2009 6:21 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
We will have to wait and see how he plays
I have not been impressed by his play at all the last few years. I think McD should have kept Williams and cut a player that is inactive every game such as Gorin or Lloyd.
by gnarlybroncodude on Nov 7, 2009 6:30 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you Gnarly
The other thing that people seem to be missing is that we are assuming that none of these guys who are over thirty (Goodman, Bailey, or now Law) are going to get injured. Bailey hasn’t finished a season healthy in a few years, Law also has some injury issues, I would liked to have had Williams around for depth and you would hope that he could learn from the likes of Bailey and Law and get better. I just think there were guys like Moss or Lloyd that would of been better cuts at this point.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Nov 7, 2009 6:49 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Losing young talent is always problematic.
The $64K is whether he was a legitimate talent with enough upside and whether or not he was coachable in the new D. I will have to have trust in the staff’s decisions and hope for the best.
BTW, losing Gorin, Lloyd, Jordan or even Gaffney would not have been much of a loss. For better or worse, they are basically aging career backups with minimal upside.
I agree, Larsen shouldn’t get any bigger. I am getting tired of his bone crushing hits knocking the pixels off my TV, once they fall to the floor they are very hard to find.
by Arctic Bronco on Nov 7, 2009 7:19 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Gaffney?
For better or worse, they are basically aging career backups with minimal upside.
Surely you jest? Jabar has been a very good performer for us all season.
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 7, 2009 10:10 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
He does jest, and stop calling him Shirley...........
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 8, 2009 8:21 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Loved that movie!
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 8, 2009 10:38 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Dumb & dumber
Sorry guys. I don’t recall the movie.
by Endzone on Nov 8, 2009 10:58 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Airplane. lol.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 8, 2009 11:30 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
The Shadow Knows
Law has been hampered the last few years by injuries. He is NOT a shadow of his former self and is reportedly in great shape. He was wanting a lot of money early in the year so a lot of teams turned him down. He was signed by the Jets on Nov 20 and injured his hamstring the first game on Nov 23. How could you possibly have seen him in a few Jets games last year? He only played a part of one game!
I was one of those not pleased with Williams’ play. So don’t go around accusing people here of being hypocrites!
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 5:05 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I did not say everyone did not question williams
However everyone on this thread us saying williams is an overrated player. Yes there have been a few people that have questioned him but not nearly this many so Get over yourself. Also on NFL.com it says Law played in 7 games for the Jets last year and started 6 so you are wrong about that him playing only one game. Check you stats before calling me a liar.
by gnarlybroncodude on Nov 7, 2009 5:09 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
You're right
Double checked nfl.com and he played 7 games and started 6.
by Endzone on Nov 7, 2009 6:41 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
rest does a person good
He may not be in his prime but he may have been helped by the lack of wear and tear of late. One important detail is that he’ll be called on as Nickel CB (or Dime, I assume), so we should judge him based on his utility as that. Experience helps him. It would be different if we were looking for a starter going into the season.
no goats, no glory.
by Colinski on Nov 7, 2009 5:18 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I hope the Colts sign him
He is perfect for the cover 2 system and we need depth big time with the number of injuries in the defensive backfield
by metal_militia on Nov 7, 2009 5:17 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Hes a good kid and has potential...Cover 2 would be a fit...good seeing you again MM!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Nov 7, 2009 5:30 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah havent been around here often
since I got the Colts on my mind and life has been getting in the way for me to listen into MHR Radio. Ill try to be on this monday if their is an postgame MHR Radio broadcast or on tuesday when its regularly on.
by metal_militia on Nov 7, 2009 5:56 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
This is my opinion
Jack Williams was possibly a fan favorite on this site, it seems to me, more because he was being called “Jack MF Williams” more than his on the field performance. Having watched every game several times, he did some nice things(if he couldn’t do anything he wouldn’t be on the field), but at the same time, as others have said, he wasn’t consistent. He was the weak spot in regards to the CB depth when he was on the field, and while anyone is going to be targeted more than Champ, in my opinion he didn’t fill the role and didn’t perform to the level he needed to.
It would be FAN-FREAKIN-TASTIC if we could have a backfield filled with talents like Dawk and Champ, however those players are special because they are unique. I get the impression that Williams wasn’t following the team mantra of “Do Your Job” as well as was needed, and because of that he got burned on several big plays. It is my understanding of the Patriots system (and in many ways the Broncos System) that you don’t need super star players at every position, rather you want players who are competent and consistent at each position. That was something that Jack Williams hasn’t been able to do in the years he has been with Denver, and with The Phonz being drafted this year, it was time for Williams to step up or get out. No hard feelings against the guy, but he wasn’t a fit for what Denver wanted to do.
And look at it from a different perspective in regards to the “Win Now” mentality that we have been discussing for months now. We have only a few years left with all of the talent we have, and McD is adamant about not being a rebuilding team. Bring in the hungry vets now to mentor the future, but win games now. Dawk doesn’t have many years left, Champ doesn’t have many years left, etc, etc, etc, and when those guys are gone then Hall of Fame talent is gone. There is a short window for this team to utilize the immense talent on D to go all the way. Like the Bronco’s teams of the 90’s, they need to capitalize now, and McD is willing to do whatever it takes to make it happen.
I am not sure if Law is going to play better than Jack or not, but I wish him the best of luck (except when he plays the Broncos, then I hope he goes out on the field with his shoe laces tied together)
RANT OVER!!!
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Nov 7, 2009 5:49 PM MST reply actions 8 recs
just doing what I can
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Nov 7, 2009 8:41 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
And doing it well - Rec'd comment!
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 7, 2009 10:12 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
We move on!
Ask yourself this…….Even with improved coaching – how much has he progressed?
Go watch the last two games and watch to get your answer!
This team will not carry passengers!
by vanbrugh on Nov 7, 2009 6:29 PM MST reply actions 1 recs
I agree with Boydy
on this
"Really, I'm a high-motor guy. Tough, hard-nosed, a hard runner, can make you miss at times. And just competitive. I love to play the game and I bring that energy to my team. So, we'll see how that goes." - Knowshon Moreno
Knowshon Moreno=ROY
by stedtfeld on Nov 7, 2009 11:03 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Crap
Law is probably only good for a year; Jack is a good player (beat out Alphonso) that would have been here for years and years…
by Merlin Scott on Nov 7, 2009 11:05 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Jack subbed for Alphonso
while Phonz was injured. I saw no evidence of “beating out”
Agreed that, probability-wise, Law may only be good for a year. But my wild guess is there is a 20% or so chance that we get three if he’s healthy and gells well with what our D is doing. And if he’s healthy and gels well, that will be one more positive than we were getting out of Jack, no matter his makeup speed.
I really liked the guy (Williams), though. I wonder how much stock should be put in the gut reaction of most of us (Oh Crap…), vs the considered (even if colored by a general trust in the coaching this year) opinions which bloomed in the course of this thread.
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Nov 7, 2009 11:38 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Note of perspective
For a few minutes this felt like a Dre Bly flashback. They even have monosyllabic cool names in common….
And then I realized that Dre was expected to INSTANTLY LOCK DOWN 1/2 THE FIELD STARTING OPPOSITE CHAMP!
In contrast, Law will be tasked with being put in where he matches up well, with no sense of desperation, maybe playing (actual running around time) 45-90 seconds a game.
Man this similar move feels very, very different.
"Aggression, discipline, accountability, effort" Brian Dawkins 9/29/2009
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing." Helen Keller
"He will always be a slave who does not know how to live upon a little" Horace
by PositivIntegral on Nov 7, 2009 11:53 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Dre
Dre Bly is a good player. But he was being paid a LOT of money for merely adequate play (more than Champ). I think he was a cap casualty since he was one of the first players cut.
Excellent point! Ty Law is not expected to start. He is expected to replace Jack Williams, imo, who was a role player.
by Endzone on Nov 8, 2009 7:22 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
The weakest link gone?
Everytime I see a receiver score a TD against the Broncos, I check the Broncos number that is the closest to him. This year I saw #26 twice get beat for TD’s. Based on the coverage that this team has been doing this year, could Williams have been the weakest link? He’s not as bad as Foxworthless, but the standard seems to be higher.
About playing against Joe Namath "He's the best in the Business, he can do everything, but I've never seen a Quarterback yet that can throw on his back." - Dave Costa 1969
by Denver Diehard on Nov 8, 2009 8:06 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I have to think
There is something on the practice field or in game films that McD did not like that we as a fan were not privy too.Maybe Williams was a locker room cancer and Law is a team leader.We do not know.
With all that being said I just hope that McD is not analyzing the players to death and making roster moves that he will live to regret.This is the second move in as many weeks that Denver has cut a player in his second year in favor of a player that has been around the league a few times.Hopefully these situations will work out for the best.
by OrangeCrush4082 on Nov 9, 2009 12:21 AM MST reply actions 0 recs

by 


























