Points of View - Why We're Winning NOW
Hey guys, I know it's been a while since I've posted. I've barely been lurking around here either. I've been so busy with school and family things the last few weeks I've barely had time to keep feeding the hungry little Bronco stampeding around in my brain. I had the chance to read several fanposts (and their comment sections, woohoo!) tonight and something popped out to me:
Early Draft Talk.
It's not bad, it's fun; and I love to enjoy reading about who we might be looking at, what we might choose to do, and who we're going to gun for. Especially with all the respectable commentary from the educated fans here that really do their homework before they open their mouths. Keep it up.
There were a few mentions about going for CBs, and O-Line in the draft; and also a great stab at stink (whom I now refer to only as: GARBAGE) by suggesting a move for D-Line. There were great points made (in the comment section of HillisRanUOver's awesome post - HERE) an all topics, but what really stood out to me was Endzone's reminder that the leaders of McNolan's X-Men (A personal nickname for our defense and team in general that I use, thanks to the inspiration from Dawkins "Weapon X", Elvis "Dr.Doom" and Marshall "Beast" 'feel free to add to my list of Comic characters') have shown a mantra of "BPA" (Best Player Available) over "Need" was used for the most part last year.
This was a great reminder of something we all talked about (ALOT) after the draft, and I personally love it. I still feel that there will be times when the Front Office will make a move for Need over BPA, because they seem to respect the importance of both methods and compromise for the best interest of the team which is: WINNING NOW.
I started to think more about the two methods and the Team Mantra we're employing, and the more I sit on it; the more the "that doesn't make sense" moves blend in seamlessly with the goals of the Broncos. The move for Law was an awesome one. I've recently noticed the teacher/student pairs of "Veteran - Apprentice/Journeyman" that McDaniels implemented with this year's draft and free agency moves, which create an internal team-building environment, that every succesful organization has going for itself. Let's start with the most obvious and work our way backwards (guys feel free to correct or add pairs in the comments section as I likely won't have the time to edit this post later)
Safeties: Dawkins/Hill - McBath/Bruton/Barrett
Corners: Bailey/Goodman/Law - Smith/Carter/Johnson
Backers (Inside): Williams/Davis - Woodyard/Larsen
Backers (Outside): Haggan/Reid - Ayers/Moss
D-Line: Holiday/Fields/Peterson - Baker/McBean/Thomas
Quarterback: Simms/Orton - Brandstater
Backers (Running): Buckhalter/Jordan - Moreno/Hillis
Receivers: Stokley/Gaffney/Lloyd - Royal/McKinley/Willis
O-Line: Weigmann/Hamilton/Hochstein/Gorin - Clady/Harris/Polumbus/Olsen/Kuper
**Note** I classified Veterans as 6+ years and listed the Apprentice/Journeymen as 3 or fewer years for the most part. I didn't include a few players like Dumerville, BMarsh, and others who are a little in between.
The purpose is to illustrate the balance of experience and youth, required to create a great learning environment. The math is simple here: aquire the most talented and suitable players for your team, make compromises to your scheme and system to fit your personnel, balance the youth and experience to create mentorship and internal leadership; and you will field a competitive team year in, and year out.
Just think logically here: If coaches can reduce the amount of information they've got to personally teach players for their specific positions by installing proven (even if old, or slower, or whatever useless adjective people used to describe good, experienced, veteran football) leaders at the player-level... how much more time will they have to utilize their own skills of position knowledge and analysis to focus on the upcoming opponent and break them down and prepare the information for the players?
People keep calling McDaniels a prodigy and genius but I don't think it even gets that far. He's just smart and practical. How often does that occur?? Most people tend to think too much, or too little. Pay attention to too much, or too little. If you can balance them both, you're going to find success. You've got to balance your own experiences with other's insight, and balance your own responsibilities by delegating what you can to the lowest levels possible. It frees up time to think and problem-solve. McDaniels is wise and has absorbed the qualities that work from his mentors. Bill has done a great job with the Patriots and I would give 50% of the credit for his success to his Business degree. It taught him the vital qualities it takes to successfully prepare 53 men for a 3-phase competition that involves rapidly expiring resources (resources being: the players' short career term, which is rookie to retired in about 10 years, all positions considered). People think you can just know a lot about football and be a successful competitor in the NFL. That you can find your way to postseason and the Superbowl consistently by just being great at coaching. Wrong. (Didn't Shanahan prove this for us? I love the guy, he was great at coaching and game planning, one of the best of all time IMO... but at being an NFL Head Coach? Good, but not great; and you can't win the SB consistantly as a good HC.)
There's more to winning than just having the talent to win and being good at what you do, coaches and players both. You've got to understand every aspect of your office/position and contribute not just 100% of what you can in your own field, but all that you can in every other field (versatility) to create the flexibility required to survive the injuries, and unexpected events of a football season and of life in general. That's a Team Philosophy.
I believe the ingredients for success here are: Passion for the Game/Winning (which helps inspire resilience, drive, and purpose), Balance of Experience/Youth Knowledge/Talent (which helps delegate authority which leads to more accountability, it also creates a fluid method of internal growth) and Secrecy (in today's game, if you show your hand early... there is very little chance you're going to have the talent, ability, or luck to find a victory). Regardless of mainstream opinion... this is still a game of strategy.
Coaches and Players alike need Passion, Balance, and Secrecy.
McNolan's X-Men are alive with passion. They are confident yet humble, experienced yet young. They keep the all doors to the past and future open, but the present is locked with Orange and Blue Staff-Only key. How far will they get this season...?
I say we let THEM be the judge of that.
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
16 recs |
30 comments
| Add comment
Comments
Well said!
Welcome back sir!
Heartily Rec’d
by topnation on Nov 9, 2009 8:38 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
What we hear from the fanbase and msm pundits is who they love in the draft.
What we really don’t know is what exactly is on the mind of our HC and I doubt if anybody does. He did give some inkling of how he sets up the draft for the team though and it is clearly best player available at the time of pick, which is the correct way to do it. They all have a list of needs in a an order of urgency but that doesn’t necessarily mean they will pick player “A” for the need when player “B” is the BPA. Player “B” will most likely be picked unless the need out weighs the BPA. We all try to guess who they will draft and that’s what makes it fun in the boring offseason but don’t try to get into the head of a HC, it won’t work. Rec’d USMC.
by bfree2bronc on Nov 9, 2009 9:46 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
If I Were Xanders
Yep. That’s right. It’s not McD’s decision. It is Xanders when it comes to the draft. He is the man responsible for player evaluations at all levels. College and Pros. OF COURSE McD has substantial input.
So, if I were Xanders, what would I do?
1. Evaluate BPA by position (eg X is #1 at WR, Y is #2 at WR, etc.) and quantify tangible and intangible values.
2. List BPA overall (eg A is #1, B is #2, X is #48, Y is #98, etc.)
3. Identify team needs (eg we really need a G, DL, CB, etc.) and quantify.
4. Identify how long it generally takes a player to make an impact (by position). For example, a RB can make an immediate impact, a DL takes two years to develop, etc.
5. On draft day, we are presented with a choice at #12. We have four BPA players identified in that general region: D at #6, E at #8, F at #13, G at #18. D is a running back, E is a G, F is a WR, G is a CB. D will cost $12M, E $8M, F $11M, G $9M. Take a peek at the salary cap and other financial issues as well as the FA market and who we currently have on the team. We do not have a “need” at RB, but we do at G. So factoring BPA with “need” we might choose player E rather than D, especially if the Dolts are looking for a G. But say we have Ryan Clady and there is a #2 ranked LT available at our #12 pick. Do we pick that guy? Maybe! We could put him at RT, we could trade him later, who knows? BPA analysis alone would dictate that you take him.
6. Love the pick or hate it in a few years. Hey! We all get lucky sometimes and often get our hearts broken.
As a fan, I often focus on the “need” of the now. As Xanders, I should focus on what is BEST for the team now and in the future. Xanders and his team put together massive research. Does anyone really think McD has the time to do that?
I am not completely on board with you on the “Secrecy” thing. I think it is more about “Execution” via coaching, repetition, planning, etc. Like a boxer, it is no secret that your opponent is going to try and knock you out. Strategy positions you to win but tactics win the battle.
PS. Thanks for the shout out Marine!
by Endzone on Nov 9, 2009 11:12 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
I heartily agree Endzone.
I wish i’d been able to incorporate “Execution” into the formula, because you are absolutely right. Excution in fact is probably at the top of the list (although you need them all). Even a team that has average talent, coaching, and passion can bring an upset with divine execution.
I guess once I get zero’d in on something the rest gets lots in my periphs.
Well now you can see why I gave you the shoutout. It sparked my inspiration, so you’re very welcome.
ORANGE CRUSH! ... need I say more?
by USMCWall on Nov 9, 2009 11:22 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Except...
.
You’re not winning now. You just got splattered by the Ravens…
by Concomitandt on Nov 9, 2009 1:21 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
6-1 is still a winning record.......... last time I checked.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 9, 2009 1:30 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
So...
the NOW part of the title, the part in capital letters, was too obvious for you?
by Concomitandt on Nov 9, 2009 2:51 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Did you read the ARTICLE?
It wasn’t about winning EVERY WEEK, it was referring to the fact that the writer of the piece thinks this team is set up to win a bunch of games and make a run through the playoffs, this season.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 9, 2009 3:28 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I just love the versatility of the word: "NOW"
ORANGE CRUSH! ... need I say more?
by USMCWall on Nov 9, 2009 11:18 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 10, 2009 7:48 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Amen brother.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 9, 2009 4:40 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Concom is right...
Maybe I should have titled it – “Why we will be winning FOREVER”
Lol.
ORANGE CRUSH! ... need I say more?
by USMCWall on Nov 9, 2009 11:26 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Where'd you go??? Just because we showed your mistake doesn't mean you have to leave forever.........
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 10, 2009 9:30 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
USMC
Great post, although I’m not ready to talk draft yet.
by bchiper on Nov 9, 2009 1:42 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Me neither. :)
I tried to curve away from it. The early draft talk launched me back into the realm of team philosophy that has been at question with the moves for Berger and Law (at least by the MSM).
Gruden had good things to say about the Broncos all night. I REALLY hated the Raiders when he was their coach. Because he was a pretty darn good coach, and had that team as close to any substantial season as Al Davis has allowed in decades.
ORANGE CRUSH! ... need I say more?
by USMCWall on Nov 9, 2009 11:15 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Have to agree I love Grudens intensity and knowledge,
I think he is one of few in the MSM that actually get what the Broncos are trying to do.
by bchiper on Nov 10, 2009 8:58 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Awesome stuff.
Gladly rec’d. This is the type of post that really gets my attention. Thinking about the abstract aspects of a football team shows what level of fans we have here at MHR.
by legendarywalton on Nov 9, 2009 2:45 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Right on, lw
That’s what brought me here and that’s what keeps me here. The level of knowledge and communication is very rare and a huge relief.
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Emmett Smith on Nov 9, 2009 3:06 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
I have a bad feeling about tonight.
by Cutler's Ghost on Nov 9, 2009 3:24 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
me too. Hopefully we can share some crowloaf tomorrow from Bronco fan tom.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by kentuckybronco on Nov 9, 2009 3:29 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
This is one of the most awesomest things I've read on this site
People keep calling McDaniels a prodigy and genius but I don’t think it even gets that far. He’s just smart and practical. How often does that occur?? Most people tend to think too much, or too little. Pay attention to too much, or too little. If you can balance them both, you’re going to find success.
by Steeplebomb on Nov 9, 2009 4:25 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for all the great feedback guys.
I can’t be the only comic fan though… C’mon, I know you’re lurking around here somewhere Kirk. ;)
You too Matt!
ORANGE CRUSH! ... need I say more?
by USMCWall on Nov 9, 2009 11:25 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I am around
Ha ha I love when you start typing with a purpose Alex. Haha! Good post here.
My favorite thing that Josh McDaniels did ,so far, is he surrounded himself with people who are better than him. Let me explain. Josh McDaniels is the best head coach on the team. Is he the best Defensive Corrdinator?? No, but he found some near the top of that list to do that job in Mike Nolan. I don’t think Josh even talks Mike during the game, at least it doesn’t seem like he does. He kept an awesome running back coach who coached all of Denvers great RB. Of course he stuck to what he is good at. Offense. My point is that he set himself up to win! And win he shall. He will do great things for Denver’s Future in the NFL
Embrace the other side, become the animal.
by mbudde33 on Nov 10, 2009 6:31 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Sometimes I just get sparked up. Then I go on, and on, and on, and on... lol. You know how it is.
It’s like Smash Bros, sometimes i’m just on fire, and the rest of the time… i’m just trying way to hard and owning myself with a down-slash on Death Blocks.
ORANGE CRUSH! ... need I say more?
by USMCWall on Nov 10, 2009 10:08 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

by 





























