Mile High Report: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cowboy Altitude for Wyoming Fans!

To balance all this PDA with Colts fans

First, I want to say that the Colts fans who've posted here have been cool guys, and probably some of the classiest visitors all year. Right on! However, screw the Colts. I hate that team with a passion only rivaled with the Chargers (right now). The team has owned us for far too long, and almost everything about the franchise annoys me. Let me count the ways (briefly)

Star-divide

1) I loathe the goody two shoes garbage. The fans (and people like Manning and Dungy) are obnoxiously nice, and there is this I'm-Better-Than-You-Because-I'm-So-Nice arrogance that simply boils my blood. Kinda reminds me of the South Park episode with the annoyingly nice Mormons. This is football, and while I can't stand the way the Raiders and Raiders South fanbases do things, I almost hate the super nice guy crap worse. Seriously, stop it! Talk some smack like a real fan!

2) Their uniforms are hideous, outdated and childish. Any team sporting tired threads like theirs should be shipped off the the arena leagues (more on this later). Seriously, a horseshoe on the helmet? Still? And have you seen the horse mascot they have -- almost as bad as the Colorado Rockies' Dinger.

3) Peyton Manning is not clever. Not funny. He is annoying and was over exposed 10 years ago. And I HATE having to see his ugly face on every commercial during anything football related. I hate his brother too, but we beat him.

4) They play in Indianapolis. No offense to anyone from Indianapolis (my girlfriend is actually from around there), but that city sucks! It is boring and simply lame.

5) The fans are mostly bandwagoners. Sure, some have been loyal, but most people in Indiana didn't care about the team before Manning. Now, that isn't automatically bad, but something for me to hate them over. Even the Broncos had some bandwagoners in the late 90s, but Denver and Broncos nation has ALWAYS been there for the Broncos. We live and die for the Broncos. They only live for the Colts when things are swell.

6) They play in a dome. Any team that plays in a dome shouldn't be in the NFL! They should be in the arena league (whenever it opens back up) because real football teams play in the muck and don't play track meet!  

7) They are the Baltimore Colts, and Elway hated them so I hate them.

8) And last but most importantly, they always kick our butt! Watching this annoying franchise beat the Broncos (especially as bad as they have) is like watching the most annoying guy in high school beat up your brother and you can't do anything about it because you only catch a glimpse of it as you're driving away on the bus ride home.

Arg! We shudda beat them this year!

Again, I hope it's obvious that I am not trying to be mean spirited or anything like that. But seriously, SCREW THE COLTS!!! Let's not forget that!  

Go Broncos!

 

This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR

2 recs  |  Comment 64 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

when manning retired

in 7-to10 years they will see how the other haif lives

okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule

by j-man on Dec 14, 2009 8:16 PM MST reply actions  

exactly

Because Montana has no professional sports, I gotta support the land of my birth.

Socrates was once executed for 'trolling'.
^Needs explaining: don't call someone asking uncomfortable, slightly antagonistic questions trolls. In all odds they probably just want to learn. It's real easy to differentiate a 'Socratic' post from a trolling one (unless you're a resident of WCG).
^Needs further explaining: I have yet to post anything on WCG, don't worry, I'm not trying to rationalize anything I've done. I've just lurked over there and man, they are the model of post-peloponnesian war Athens.

by Drizzt396 on Dec 15, 2009 7:35 PM MST up reply actions  

They are the Baltimore Colts, and Elway hated them so I hate them.

Can’t argue with that logic. Nice job, man.

If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
Girl, you don't need to be a 10, as long as you have a good smile and smell like bacon.

by kentuckybronco on Dec 14, 2009 8:19 PM MST reply actions   1 recs

Well

If they’ve been around for any amount of time (and many of them haven’t) they would know that other side. There is a reason they got Manning

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 14, 2009 8:20 PM MST reply actions  

+1

Are you NOT entertained!?!? -Maximus

by c2c75 on Dec 14, 2009 8:32 PM MST reply actions  

++++1

It is no fun to hate Baltimore Indy because they are so Maybury Down Home kinda nice. At least the Oakland fans are obnoxious …… they know how to play the villian role properly!

by Flunkie on Dec 14, 2009 9:09 PM MST reply actions  

I guess I am a bit dense

but what does the +1 stuff mean? I am guessing it is better than a -1

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 11:00 AM MST up reply actions  

Well, I always thought it meant Rec'd and when I say +1, I hit the Rec'd button immediately.

However, some people say +1 without recommending anything. So, it still means that someone agrees with a comment or post, but sometimes it is more of a verbal “atta boy”, than anything else.

In this case, the math adds up. There are two recs for the posts and two +1’s in the comment section.

If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
Girl, you don't need to be a 10, as long as you have a good smile and smell like bacon.

by kentuckybronco on Dec 15, 2009 11:12 AM MST up reply actions  

Oh

haha thanks! I am still a bit new to blog culture. :-)

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 11:18 AM MST up reply actions  

The commenters at the Colts Blog always do +18 for Peyton. Or + whatever the player's number is

and is relevant to the discussion.

Would this give you another reason to hate us? If you need more. Because really eight isn’t enough. We prefer 18 reasons for most things. Or 19 if you’re going old school.

by diagenesis on Dec 15, 2009 12:55 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

nah!

There are corny things Broncos fans do. Especially with 7. I think its a cool little fan sub culture thing.

How about this, though, I will add another number if you lose to San Diego and I have to tolerate the Raiders South either going to or (worse) winning the Super Bowl. You HAVE to beat them if it comes down to you and them (which I think it will in the AFC). Losing to them would be the most unforgivable trangression and would be second worse only to preventing us from going to and winning the Super Bowl.

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 2:49 PM MST up reply actions  

My point has always been, how can the NFL allow a team to have a dome?

There is only three in the league and that is a clear advantage as far as weather and elements. Sure their going to be a good team if they play half of their games in a house! Give me a break! Ant they talk about Mile Hile being such a great advantage, just ask Pittsburg how they feel about that. I have never understood how anyone [in their right mind, mind ya] could like a team like that? Cream-puffs. That’s it.

by bfree2bronc on Dec 14, 2009 11:22 PM MST reply actions  

Actually..

….there are 8 domes in the league – Undee, Arizona, Detroit, New Orleans, Atlanta, Dallas, St. Louis and Minnesota. But the new one in Undee is the ugliest, hands down (from the outside).
Interesting though – I just noticed that only one of the 8 is in the AFC.

We will now discuss in a little more detail the Struggle for Existence.
Charles Darwin. (The Origin Of Species)

by bradley on Dec 15, 2009 11:57 AM MST up reply actions  

Should have remembered Houston

They had to mess with their schedule a year ago because of hurricane damage to the roof. And I admit that the “Drum” looks great on the inside, but the pics I’ve seen from the outside look squat and, well, squat. Big and impressive though.

We will now discuss in a little more detail the Struggle for Existence.
Charles Darwin. (The Origin Of Species)

by bradley on Dec 15, 2009 12:45 PM MST up reply actions  

Well, and San Diego

I know it isn’t a traditional dome, but 65-70 degrees year round essentially acts as a dome. Thus, ship those losers to an arena league too ;-)

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 12:51 PM MST up reply actions  

Domes are not an advantage

Domes teams have a historically bad record in the Superbowl, and in the playoffs. Games get tougher and dome teams are “soft” in general. I am so glad McD makes them practice outside!

Indescision is the key to flexibility

by akbroncosfan on Dec 15, 2009 12:51 PM MST up reply actions  

Exactly

“Soft.” Thus, they don’t play football and should be gone. That said, the Broncos have had some soft teams lately, but that is more of a result of them sucking than where they play their home games.

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 12:53 PM MST up reply actions  

Against a GROSSman-led team

I still think if the Bears had a pee-wee league starting quarterback that year they would’ve beat the Colts. That wasn’t exactly the most impressive Super Bowl performance ever.

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 1:56 PM MST up reply actions  

I think we all agreed that the Super Bowl was the AFC championship that year.

Our most impressive performance during that run was the game in Baltimore against that Baltimore defense.

All I said is we’ll try and improve on the dome Super Bowl record. We’re the only dome team to win the Super Bowl outside a dome. And we shall strive to do better. Hopefully, the NFC will try and send us a better opponent this time? Although four out of the five best teams in the NFC are dome teams, so it’s likely we’ll be facing another dome team.

by diagenesis on Dec 15, 2009 2:52 PM MST up reply actions  

Colts and Saints

Would be a helluva show (though I’d have to root for the Aints). And I agree that if Indy beat them it would cement them as a dominant team of this era. Right now they are red headed bastards to Pitts and NE. Honestly, I think Indy is under a lot of pressure — probably more than any team, and if I were an Indy fan I wouldn’t want the undefeated crap hanging over my head.

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 3:08 PM MST up reply actions  

"Soft"

That may be true. The only dome teams to win a SB are the Colts and the Rams. Plus Dallas a couple times, if you want to count the old Texas Stadium a dome.

We will now discuss in a little more detail the Struggle for Existence.
Charles Darwin. (The Origin Of Species)

by bradley on Dec 15, 2009 1:02 PM MST up reply actions  

Texas stadium was not a dome

more like an open arena with a life preserver set on posts above it.

"Never give up! Never surrender!" Captain Peter Quincy Taggert in "Galaxy Quest"
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It

by BShrout on Dec 15, 2009 2:09 PM MST up reply actions  

don’t be surprised that in a point in time they all will be played in a DOME

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 1:26 PM MST up reply actions  

Ugh

If that’s true. I hate dome games.

We will now discuss in a little more detail the Struggle for Existence.
Charles Darwin. (The Origin Of Species)

by bradley on Dec 15, 2009 1:30 PM MST up reply actions  

Only someone with a corny horseshoe

as an avatar would say that. Garbage. Won’t happen! Real football towns will ALWAYS play outdoor in the grass. Fluky trend teams where the fan bases won’t attend unless a) the team is winning and b) they play indoors so they don’t get their precious piggies cold. I’d rather see two leagues if we keep this dome (and half dome) trend up: A) the National Football League (played outdoors in the elements and 2) the Powder Puff League, featuring the indoor delights of the Indianapolis Colts and their ballerina all stars.

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 2:03 PM MST up reply actions  

Powder Puff League? hmm, ok if that is how you want to describe the team that has won against your team ………………..not really saying much about your team then, is it?

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 2:08 PM MST up reply actions  

The Broncos have been VERY weak

the last few years, and we weren’t able to out finesse the Colts in all these recent matchups. We don’t have a Manning. That is one of the reasons I am glad to have McD and Shanny is gone. We got soft.

This year we’re still soft but getting much tougher. Mostly we’re inconsistent and finding an identity. After the Undees got 21 points they were lucky we didn’t capitalize! We should have won that game or at least had the lead in the 3rd quarter. Once we got tough Peyton looked like JaMarcus the Hutt. Did you watch that game? Do you really want to play us again after we figured you out? Are you seriously THAT stoked on your team and their victory? If I were you I would worry.

This ain’t the Broncos’ year, and I am okay with that. But it ain’t the Colts’ either. The best you can hope for (I think) is to get worked in the Super Bowl by one of the all-time best finesse teams: The Saints.

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 2:16 PM MST up reply actions  

Ok you brought it up so yes I would like to see them play each other again.
After the Colts got 21 on you they played the cover 2 the way they always play it, keep all plays in front of them and NO long plays.
Do you really think your man BM 21 catches bothered the Colts, how many points did he score on all those catches, O, check his ypc on those he averaged less than 10 ypc, thirteen was for less than 10 yards and seven were for five yards or less.
As for your childish bait about if the Colts get to play the Saints, that is yet to be seen.

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 2:37 PM MST up reply actions  

Look at the stats

It wasn’t just Brandon Marshall. The Colts won because we melted down on 3rd down and in the Redzone, which is common with a team learning a new system and forming a new identity. Again, this isn’t Denver’s year. But look at the stats. Other than the scoreboard (which , granted, is most important) the only place the Colts beat us was in rezone (Undee 4 for 4, Denver 2 for 4).

As much as the Colts have tormented us, I would love that game in the playoffs and think that redemption would be SUPER sweat. If we lose it would be expected. Bummer. Thus, we have NOTHING to lose in that matchup. We can play out of our minds and with a thirst for revenge. Do you really want that? I know you have nothing to fear because Denver hasn’t rarely even competed with the Colts, and you’re bathing in your own arrogant overconfidence, but as you saw Sunday this is a different Denver team.

Finally, I think you’re letting your fandom and media hype blind you to how great you think this team is. Aside from NE (maybe Denver) who have the Colts beat. Your division played the NFC West this year and because you didn’t win the division last year you’ve had no division winners. NE was stupid and should’ve beat the Colts. So should Houston and Denver. Now, good teams find a way, and the 98 Broncos had to play some weak teams tough. But I would worry if I were you. Remember the last time a Colts team went 13-0. Where were they when the Super Bowl was played? The same place we were: on the couch watching!

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 3:04 PM MST up reply actions  

in 2005, the then 13-0 Colts played their starters for the entire game against ( the Chargers, then quarterbacked by Drew Brees. The Colts had locked up homefield the week before, and were playing the game despite it meaning “nothing” in the standings. Again, with the starters playing, the Colts lost 26-17. The next week, Tony Dungy’s son hanged himself in his apartment, creating a horrible (but understandable) distraction for the team and then-coach. The Colts then lost in the division round to the eventual world champion Steelers.

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 3:09 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes

They lost! As in they didn’t win the Super Bowl. Very good! ;-)

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 3:12 PM MST up reply actions  

Well you can dance in memory lane all you want the fact is the Colts have won more games than ANY team in the last decade, most 12 game a season or more than any team in history, longest winning streak in history and with skill and some luck a new SB ring

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 3:20 PM MST up reply actions  

Good enough for Elway, Good enough for me, man!

"But I hate the way our identity has changed..Kyle Orton might not be the flashiest quarterback, but the guy is a winner, and that formula worked for us. I hate to say it, but that’s the truth." --Brian Urlacher

by TJ Johnson on Dec 14, 2009 11:55 PM MST reply actions  

haha

as long as it makes us feel better! :-D

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 12:47 PM MST up reply actions  

after all it’s human nature to hate what you envy is it not?

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 1:29 PM MST up reply actions  

I envy the Colts because they are better than we are right now

But in terms of tradition and success, I do not. And remember, the BALTIMORE Colts had a tradition; the Indianapolis Colts have the last 10 years, a half empty stadium until recently and a nice tradition of losing to tougher teams (N.E., Pitts) when they had/have the best quarterback of this generation.

After you win two super bowls and boast some of the other accomplishments the Broncos have, then let’s rap on this topic. Until then enjoy this year when there are no tough teams to challenge you because this may be one of your last opportunities. And as much as it pains me to say, the Raiders South will probably beat you again in the playoffs — and I don’t say that to talk smack because TRUST ME I don’t want that to happen. But this years Colts aren’t as impressive as you think.

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 2:08 PM MST up reply actions  

Well they sure are impressing quite a few, check the sports articles.

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 2:52 PM MST up reply actions  

-18

for using sports articles in an argument. :)

by diagenesis on Dec 15, 2009 2:53 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

lol, better than the so called sports media.

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 2:56 PM MST up reply actions  

-18

For letting the hype machine cloud your judgement. They want to sell magazines, and they’re invested in Manning because they bring $$$

And for not addressing the core of my logic. ;-)

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 3:11 PM MST up reply actions  

And as much as it pains me to say, the Raiders South will probably beat you again in the playoffs — and I don’t say that to talk smack because TRUST ME I don’t want that to happen. But this years Colts aren’t as impressive as you think
-——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
They may very well beat us, who knows till they play, and for someone who is trying very hard to convince someone that you’re not trying to talk smack, it’s failing.

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 3:30 PM MST up reply actions  

I am talking smack ;-)

Just not with what you quote! Or, rather, with the point about Raiders South beating you. I don’t only say that to smack it up. Colts not being impressive? That’s a bit smackish!

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 4:19 PM MST up reply actions  

Honestly, when you keep on doing what you've done for seven straight years, it's not very impressive.

I understand. We will have to win the Super Bowl in an exciting fashion to impress the league. We accept this challenge.

/Goody-two-shoes-Colts-fan-answer

by diagenesis on Dec 15, 2009 4:21 PM MST up reply actions  

I am not sure impressive

is the word I would use, but when a team like Indy is hyped soooooo much every year. And every year they are the Super Bowl team. And every year they are the best team. And most often than not they flame out, it does get old and people doubt that they are the dominant team the hype machine media make them out to be. That ain’t the Colts fans fault or even the Colts themselves — but when you have to constantly have to hear about a team that hasn’t accomplished what the hype would suggest, it gets annoying. And no team is more guilty of this than the Raiders South; they’ve NEVER accomplished anything yet we always have to hear about how great they are.

But look at it this way: this is only because the Colts are compared against the Patriots and Steelers. That’s not a bad place to be and I would LOVE Denver to be in that discussion.

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 4:30 PM MST up reply actions  

Well in all honesty if they keep going down the road that they are they may very well be hard to beat.

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 4:33 PM MST up reply actions  

Denver that is,post is somewhat confusing

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 4:34 PM MST up reply actions  

Only someone with a corny horseshoe
as an avatar would say that. Garbage. Won’t happen! Real football towns will ALWAYS play outdoor in the grass. Fluky trend teams where the fan bases won’t attend unless a) the team is winning and b) they play indoors so they don’t get their precious piggies cold. I’d rather see two leagues if we keep this dome (and half dome) trend up: A) the National Football League (played outdoors in the elements and 2) the Powder Puff League, featuring the indoor delights of the Indianapolis Colts and their ballerina all stars.
-———————————————————————————————————————————————————-
This is what I was talking about when you kept saying you weren’t trying to talk trash or smack, which ever you want to label it.

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 4:43 PM MST up reply actions  

Oh that was smack!

And I hope so (referring to road comment).

And I hope that we can beat up on you guys the same way NE beat up on you and the same way you have beat up on us over the last 10 years. ;-)

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 4:56 PM MST up reply actions  

lol, ok have a great night and keep them dreams going.

by Ufanforreal on Dec 15, 2009 5:25 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes

I hate it that there are Domed stadiums. When the Vikings moved inside, it was the downfall of the league. It was real touch to play them at home in November and December and the NFL took away that homefield advantage. Football is supposed to be played in the rain and snow and mud. I mean C’mon, you don’t see a dome in Green Bay.

Here is another reason for your list vince. The Super Bowl will be played in INDY next year.

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks

by KaptainKirk on Dec 15, 2009 3:31 PM MST reply actions  

"Here is another reason for your list vince. The Super Bowl will be played in INDY next year."

Ooh! Imagine all the revelry in the Unplace!

We will now discuss in a little more detail the Struggle for Existence.
Charles Darwin. (The Origin Of Species)

by bradley on Dec 15, 2009 3:56 PM MST up reply actions  

You're right of course

I got carried away. My bad.

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks

by KaptainKirk on Dec 16, 2009 9:34 AM MST up reply actions  

Good call!

Super Bowls in cold climate domes is simply unamerican and WRONG! :-)

~me

by vincerelli on Dec 15, 2009 4:21 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!
Start posting about the Broncos »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bill-hicks-smoking_small
Better Know the Jacksonville Jaguars: Ask Big Cat Country
Legend_of_the_seeker_small
Five Inconspicuous Reasons the Broncos Have a Bright Future
C1060ltp4_small
Bushido: the Soul of a Bronco
Mhr_shirt_small
Broncos Vs Vikings Studs and Duds
Throwback_orton_small
Tebow's Throwing Motion Sickness

Recent FanPosts

Agentj_small
TOP 5 Q from 2010 Preseason
Studs-terkel_small
Better or Worse in 2010? Chibronx brings the Nerdy Tables. You Bring the Debate
Uncle-sam_small
2010 Schedule Analysis and Prediction Final Part & Hold Yourselves Accountable!
Mhr_shirt_small
Roster Analysis
Broncos_small
Ryan Harris
Images_small
The Questions "I" Want Answered Can the Broncos make the Playoffs?
399_small
Broncos add 5 to practice squad
Small
2008 V. 2010

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Next Game

SPONSORS

Web Stuff

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, Baltimore Ravens: It's Joe Flacco's Turn

New York Jets wide receiver Darrelle Revis signals to the fans during football practice at the new Meadowlands Stadium, Wednesday, June 16, 2010 in East Rutherford, N.J. (AP Photo/Bill Kostroun) +22 updates

When You're A Jet: Darrelle Revis Agrees To Terms With New York On Extension

Photo +9 updates

Matt Leinart Reportedly Signs One-Year Deal With The Houston Texans

More from SBNation.com >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
LeGarrette Blount Claimed by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Mocking The Draft
Rock out with your mock draft out: Scott Wright
Mile High Report
Broncos Add Three More to Practice Squad

General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

Superstock_253-215_small Jeremy Bolander

Asst. Head Coach

Coach_pic_small Steve Nichols

Tahoetim_small Tim Lynch

Tjpic1_small TJ Johnson

Broncos_camp_2_054_small Sayre Bedinger

Position Coach

Bronco-pride_small BShrout

Me_as_a_simpson_small ejruiz

Mmgg_004_small KaptainKirk

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small kentuckybronco

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk