The Alphonso Smith pick - Good or Bad?
Of all the moves Josh McDaniels has made this season, the only one that I have the most difficulty coming around to is the one that sent our 2010 first round pick next year to the Seattle Seahawks in exchange for the 37th overall pick in the 2009 draft, which was used to select Alphonso Smith.
Any idiot will tell you that a first rounder for a second rounder is a stupid move, no matter how you look at it, but perhaps that not true.
Let's discuss the pros and cons of this list after the jump:
First of all Josh McDaniels and Brian Xanders have both claimed they felt that Alphonso Smith was a first round talent. What they failed to consider is that there are many different kinds of first round talents. There are Top 10 talents, and then there are Top 30 talents. Depending on how things go in a draft, you can have a guy with top 10 talent fall to the middle or end of the first round.
We traded what will most likely turn out to be the 19th to the 25th pick, depending on how things go these next few weeks. Of course one of the best parts of this trade is that we get a player a year earlier. Alphonso Smith should be exceptionally better next year, than he was this year. The Corner back position is one that takes time to learn at the NFL level.
However, who knows what might be available when that pick comes around, it could be that a top 10 talent might fall that far, perhaps the next Antonio Cromartie might be there (the 19th overall pick in the 2006 draft). Sometimes really great players fall back that far.
Another consideration is that the salary cap hit we take for a middle second round pick is a fraction of a late first rounder. This seems to me to be one of the major factors in the trade. This move reeks of "Bill Bellicheck cap manipulation".
The question becomes thus: Will Alphonso Smith actually become a worthy selection? I don't think we should judge him until the end of next season, but I have a feeling he is going to fill in as a starting CB at some point for either Champ or Andre Goodman, who are both getting old, and thus injury-prone, and he will prove his worth many times over.
My prediction: Alphonso will become our breakout player next year and gain national attention for his 12 interceptions with as many pass breakups. Remember where you heard it first!
Go Broncos!
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hopefully
That happens, but Smith has regressed since his injury. I’m still wondering what happened. One thing Smith can do is tackle so If smith can digest all of the info he’s learned from the vets then I can see him becoming sort of like Winfield.
"Pleased? We are excited about the proposition of going forward from where we are right now. Pleased? I don't know if you want to say pleased. You may want to hang your hat on pleased. I don't want to hang my hat on nothing right now."
-Brian Dawkins, on the play of the defense
Once he gets his hands on you, there's not much you're going to do. Then you can't outrun him, you can't run around him, you can't really run him over -- so you've just got to deal with it."
Elvis Dumerville, on Ryan Clady
A.Smith will probably a good pick when it is all said and done.
I look for him mostly in the nickle set and wouldn’t use him against the taller WR’s.
I agree, this will end up being a good pick.
The guy has talent, no doubt. Once he’s healthy, he should be the ballhawk he was in Wake Forest.
"Really, I'm a high-motor guy. Tough, hard-nosed, a hard runner, can make you miss at times. And just competitive. I love to play the game and I bring that energy to my team. So, we'll see how that goes." - Knowshon Moreno
Knowshon Moreno=ROY
Where is this analysis of his talent coming from, last year's college tape?
He hasn’t been out on the field enough to tell what kind of talent he has, unless you’re at the practices every day.
by legendarywalton on Dec 24, 2009 3:29 AM MST reply actions
His struggles may be due to high ankle sprain...
which he sustained early in the season. Let’s wait for his second year
In my opinion...
He will be a great player, but not yet. You can’t judge a player yet, not for a couple years. Smith has struggled this season, but will be improved next year. Maybe someday he will be the next Champ Bailey, maybe not, too soon to tell. The trade was questionable, but if we had traded a first rounder for the opportunity to draft Champ in the second round do you think the same questions would have been raised? Asomugha of the Oakland Raiders was drafted 31st, only a few spots earlier (albeit a different draft) if we had traded a 25th overall pick for him would anyone mind? Point is, give the kid some time… we could have a star in the waiting
when i saw that we had traded up
I was so psyched because Rey Maualuga was still on the board to my disbelief, I started shoutin and holarin at my friends watchin with me. Then we picked some cornerback I never heard of before, now I did do some research on him and started to like him a bit more. Yet after this year I still say we should have gone with Rey Rey at that spot, who many wanted us to pick up in the first round I might add.
You can hope, but I have my doubts
Smith was hailed as NFL ready, “he had so many int in college”, he was a senior, yada, yada, yada. The fact are that Smith is small and slow, too things that aren’t good qualities in a CB, all the coaching in the world won’t change those facts. He is not what I would consisder a number 1 CB by any strech of the imagination, maybe, maybe he can become a decent number 2 CB, but when you loss your starting job as a nickle back to the likes of Jack Williams, Ty Law, and now Tony Carter…chances are you aren’t that good. I hope he turns the corner (no pun intended) but this was a bad trade and it still is, it was a gamble that McDaniels ws making and it does not look like it payed off.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
Small and slow?
He’s a bit over 5’9, but he weighs in at just over 190 lb so it’s a bit of a stretch to say that he’s ‘small’. Let’s agree on ‘short’. He’s very muscular and hit hard.
As far as slow – his combine times averaged at 4.47, which is hardly slow. He’s been timed in the 4.3 range several times and simply doesn’t have a lot of practice at running track, which makes no difference – one of his scores was quite high and moved the average. Even if you argue that, almost every one of his predraft scouting reports had something similar to the War Room, which commented
Closing speed: Has the explosive closing burst to consistently make plays on the ball. Shows the playing speed to stay with receivers on deep routes. Grade: 8.5
He has played this season with a couple of leg injuries – high ankle and hammie – which may also be of issue. We’ll find out next season. In the meantime, let’s be accurate about the claims that we make.
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
I have to agree with Emmett.
I was at Camp and got his autograph. He may be slightly smaller in stature to me (I’m 5’10"), but the man is ripped and chiseled. He also looked pretty fast on the PR unit at Camp.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
By the way
Some sites show him at 4.51 instead of 4.47, but they also note that the fastest CB time during this Combine (in which the overall times were universally slow for reasons that no one has made clear) was the 4.46 average shared by Darius Butler, L. Webb and B Johnson. .05 – maximum – is a pretty small difference.
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
etiology of attitudes concerning the trade
What’s apparent about many people’s attitudes concerning Alphonso Smith is how they were developed. Strangely, the ‘why’ of attitudes is usually as important as the ‘what.’ Attitudes are rarely simple empirical observations about events — they usually reveal underlying beliefs and emotional predispositions. As such, many people’s opinions about Smith are expressions of their feelings about the Cutlergate issue, and about the direction the team should have taken in the face of what appeared would be a losing season.
Attitudes about the Smith trade are inextricably interwoven with the belief that our best course of action was to accept our fate and bank a high draft pick that was in the offing. That high pick would be ‘earned’ after we failed miserably because we had traded away a franchise QB. The clear course of action — in the eyes of many — was to accept this terrible fate and gradually build a team with high picks, which was an inevitable outcome for a team with so few prospects for success.
‘Why’ many people dislike Smith (or what he represents), is easy to analyze. They disliked numerous aspects of how he became a Bronco. Namely; the terms of the trade that brought him here, the ‘fact’ that we had foolishly traded an expected high pick, the ‘fact’ that we were willingly blind to our fate, the ‘fact’ that we had foregone rebuilding for another year, the ‘fact’ that our HC has so foolishly slighted our franchise QB by discussing a trade for him, and so on and so on.
What can be said about attitudes is that people rarely give them up, and they hold to them even when the apparent facts make them untenable. People — speaking in general — often defer from voicing their beliefs when doing so would expose them to ridicule or social sanctions, but for many people those beliefs continue on and lie just below the surface, only to emerge at a later time when the situation allows for their expression.
Oddly, the ‘why’ of beliefs is often best answered by ignoring what people say about why they believe what they do. People have a strong motivation to appear reasonable, so what they say about why they believe is often the spin that they put on the belief to make it appear acceptable in the eyes of others. Moreover, it’s not always the case that people are aware of why they believe what they do. Emotion and logic go hand and hand in the brain but what’s spun as a logical decision is often an emotional one, and the holder of a belief is a very poor judge of the emotional processes that generate that opinion.
There are some objective metrics for first year CBs and first year players in general, but before examining those it’s interesting to note the roster moves that were made at the CB position this year. Curiously, the signing of Ty Law was greeted in many quarters as confirmation of Smith’s failure even though Jack Williams was cut immediately before Law was signed. Normally, releasing one player and signing another at the same position is considered as a comment on the released player, but many chose to interpret the move as comment on Smith instead.
There is a diagnostic value to the fact that many chose to interpret Jack Williams’ release and the concomitant signing of Law as a comment on Alphonso Smith’s performance. On one hand, there was reason to believe that Smith had performed inadequately since there would be little reason to sign Law if Smith had excelled. On the other hand, Law’s signing in itself could be merely an indication of the staff’s desire to bring in a former pro-bowler who still had value and, even more importantly, experience, which was highly valued where McDaniels has formerly coached. If people had seized upon the cut & signing as a comment on Williams’ performance then it would have made sense. The fact is that the cut of Williams only elicited some surprise and very little commentary on why he wasn’t kept.
The ‘natural’ conclusion was that Williams had failed rather than Smith, but many saw it as a sign that Smith had failed instead. Although it’s arguable whether those who took that position were critics of the trade that brought him aboard initially, but there are sound reasons for believing that this is the case. Underlying disapproval of many of the changes during the off-season had remained but — often — in a dormant state, only to re-emerge once again when the circumstances favored voicing that disapproval. It would have been unseemly to criticize the Broncos during their six-game winning streak at the beginning of the season, and very few people did, but the losses after that point opened the door once again and many who had stuck to their guns, or nowt returned to them, were free to criticize once the team’s fortunes had changed.
DraftTek recently posted an evaluation of how the 2009 draftees have performed. It looks like a fairly accurate appraisal although people may find parts that they don’t like.
Synopsis: many of the higher picks have become starters, but many of those draftees have also played on poor teams (thus the high pick), which put them into starting positions where they could stand out. This is in no way a rationalization, but disentangling the player’s performance from favorable circumstances is difficult. For instance, LBs dominate the league’s defensive statistics so it’s hardly surprising that some of the LBs in the draft have succeeded. And some of those clearly earned their success, too, such as Aaron Curry. However, some of the other LBs have also produced but it’s not clear how much of that success is merely the product of playing a position that produces performance metrics rather than a sign of something truly exceptional.
Performances at the CB position have been mixed. Earlier in the season, Vontae Davis, Miami’s pick at #25, was lost and appeared to be a major disappointment. He has since excelled and is one of the top success stories of the group. Sean Smith, also of Miami, whom many liked, has also performed quite well. Another success story would be Jairus Byrd, although he’s used more like a Safety, as well as playing in a situation that’s conducive to high numbers, so there’s a problem with comparability. Many of the successes are surprises, which virtually nobody had predicted, not even the teams that drafted them or they would have picked them higher. Not many people here advocated taking Derek Cox so it’s tough to figure out what to say when he’s cited as a good example by someone who had never heard of him at the time he was drafted.
Many of the CBs that we’re discussed before the last draft haven’t quite fulfilled expectations. Curiously (or perhaps not), fans of their respective teams often place higher expectations on them than fans of other teams. What we might consider a success is not considered a success by the team’s own fans. This also works in the opposite direction, too, and points to the fact that popularity and success (as defined by the coaches) are often very different things.
Grading:
* 1 – Established NFL Star player
* 2 – Solid Starter
* 3 – Promising future, a significant contributor
* 4 – NFL capability not yet proven. A slight disappointment, or plays at a position which requires a few years to develop
* 5 – Definite disappointment
* 6 – Flat out bust
Finally, the grades that DT gives our picks in the first three rounds are: Moreno ( 2), Ayers ( 3 ), Smith ( 3 ),
McBath ( 3 ), Quinn ( 4 )
Overall, our grades a slightly below normal but close to the average. One can argue with the grades they’ve assigned but one of the things that makes this evaluation accurate and objective is the fact it’s not produced (presumably) by a fan of the Broncos. Rather than being caught up in Jaygate and all of its associated issues, a view from afar can be more accurate, even though there’s less information at the author’s disposal. Whereas fans here at MHR are experts on everything about the Broncos, what’s often missing is an overview from around the league. Interestingly, one attitude that’s common around the league is the belief that many of their draftees are disappointments, although in many cases the opposite is true. What many fans don’t realize is that bias exists for every fan base, whether pro or con, and debates swirl about how certain players are worse than expected and others are better than expected, but still fail to win playing time for some odd reason.
no goats, no glory.
by Colinski on Dec 24, 2009 5:01 PM MST reply actions 2 recs
I found their take on Moreno interesting
Particularly since there have been so many negative comments about him this week. I have heard from some posters that he hasn’t improved, which I found odd — it looked like he had on the film I saw:
Moreno is getting better every week. He is a solid starter, is leading all rookies in rushing yards, stays in on 3rd downs, and does everything one could hope from a rookie. He has 4 fumbles, but is showing improvements here as well.
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
And cant block worth a crap in the last 3 weeks...his inability to read a blitz and block has cost us the last 3 weeks IMO. He will improve, but they were costly mistakes!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
re: Moreno
Some arguments reveal their underlying emotional predisposition because they’re too good — so to speak. The “the accident was actually his fault …. besides I wasn’t even there at the time” defense, is an example of when an argument goes too far in its attempt to avert blame.
Attempts to critique Alphonso Smith flounder when they bring Smith into the argument, in much the same way as “besides I wasn’t even there at the time of the accident” hurts the overall argument rather than aiding its goal.
Critiquing a 4-time rookie of the week is difficult when phrased in hyperbolic form because the rest of the NFL clearly disagrees. Moreover, the emotional roots of the argument are exposed when additional elements — which are obviously motivated cognitions — are seized upon to embellish that side of the argument.
Going back to the scouting on Moreno, which has now been shown to be the case — Moreno is/was a complete back whose abilities as a pass catcher and blocker add to his value. It’s also why he held even more value to us, because of his utility in a 1-back set.
Frustration over our recent losses spurred a play Hillis movement, and I admit to being one of its proponents. The underlying psychological dynamic is clear — Hillis is a mostly unused resource, thus an untried solution to our problems in the run game. Hillis’ scouting shows a West Coast FB with strengths at pass catching and downhill running but a weakness at blocking, which also explains how Larsen, who hadn’t played as a back since H.S., could start over him. In other words, what Hillis lacks as a FB is the primary task he’s needed for. Looking at his utility as a RB, he’s clearly not the running threat that Moreno and Buckhalfter are, and his ability as a blocker in pass protection is once again an issue. The idea of playing Hillis still has appeal but he’s even more vulnerable when caught in the backfield by penetration so his downhill ability never comes into play since he can’t gain a head of steam.
I’m willing to entertain arguments but it’s hard for me to ignore obvious instances of motivated cognition.
no goats, no glory.
Thanks ski and doc.
I have faith in what our coaches are doing as far as player wise, some of the play calling has me saying hmm, but all in all in the first year as head coach I would give McDaniels a B+. Not an A because an A would be perfect and there is room for improvement.
On the Smith subject, it is ludicrous to even think this kid is a bust or even a mistake pick. Those questions haven’t been answered yet and won’t be for some time. Why Jack Williams was released was a mystery to me and had me scratching my head. I though he had a couple of good games at the first part of the year, we saw he defense a couple of passes and his man coverage was it suspect? I don’t know and I am not sure if he was picked up by anybody else. So there must be a problem.
by bfree2bronc on Dec 25, 2009 10:55 AM MST up reply actions
Hope Smith
turns out to be a great player but I hated the trade on draft day and I still do. Xanders and McDaniels better not trade a future 1st rounder for a 2nd round pick again or I will personally write Mr. Bowlen a letter and ask him to fire both of them and start over again with a new general manager and coaching staff!
That's funny, because at the moment that happened there were 50,000 other people thinking the same thing.
This may be one way to look at it, since I am not an analyst but don’t you think if McDaniels thought he was giving Seattle a top ten pick he wouldn’t of done that? That move he made spoke volumes of how smart this coach really is. He had faith in his judgement that the Broncos were going to be more successful than the Bears. He saw right through jay cutler from the beginning and in his own mind probably figured why should I waste my and the franchises valuable time trying to coach a player that might not be coachable.That’s two brilliant moves. next, McDaniels saw in Smith a first round quality player that no one wanted because (in their opinion) he was too short. Guess what, he got a first rd player in the 2nd rd 37th pick. Not bad as far as value goes is it? I’ll take quality over value any day of the week and if the Head Coach decides to make another decision like he made, I would have to trust his judgement that he knows more about the ins and outs of this game than we’ll ever thank about knowing. I hope Smith turns out to be a great player on the Darrell Green scale, but only time will give us that answer.
by bfree2bronc on Dec 25, 2009 11:09 AM MST up reply actions
I would have taken Rey over Smith any day. But Smith does have upside!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
I would of too boydy and wondered why Rey went so low.
You just brought to my mind a case we have in DJ Williams. DJ is a good player, but he makes mistakes that cost the team sometimes. He’s been around for a while now and you would think he would start to get it. No one on here says much about DJ and I’ve wondered why, he is not a top 5 ILB IMO and probably never will be. I notice he did get a mohawk haircut to mimic merriman so that’s not a bad thing I guess. But, watch him in the games we lost and you will generally find him soemwhere away from the play, either by overplaying or miss reading the play. I hope McD/Nolan address the ILB position this upcoming spring.
by bfree2bronc on Dec 25, 2009 11:23 AM MST up reply actions
remember Beckwith or Ellerbe?
You should read this.
Over the past 10 years (2000-09), only four inside or middle linebackers have been drafted in the first round of the draft — the only position with less first-round picks over that time is fullbacks with none (not including punters/kickers).
The reason for this is because unless a prospect can play all three downs as an inside linebacker or can rush the passer and create big plays, teams are waiting to the later rounds to fill a need at the position.
Over the past two years, only 15 inside linebackers have been selected over the entire draft. In 2002, just two were taken in the first four rounds while only four were chosen in the first four rounds in 2006. In the 2009 draft, two very good players James Laurinaitis (Ohio State) and Rey Maualuga (USC) did not get picked until the second round by the Rams (35th overall) and Bengals (38th), respectively.
I wonder what former great Hall of Fame linebackers like Dick Butkus, Sam Huff, Jack Lambert, Willie Lanier, Ray Nitschke, and Joe Schmidt think of this present trend.
no goats, no glory.
re: reflections on the trade
I appreciate your admission concerning your feelings about the trade, broncorob.
One of the points I wanted to address in my earlier post but omitted is the framing of it. The frame of the pick we used to obtain Smith as potential high 1st rounder is contentious. Obviously, there’s no way the pick could still be worth a high 1st rounder since the worst we can do places it in the last half of the 1st round. Moreover, considering it as 1st rounder at all misleads since Smith was chosen with a 2nd round pick.
No team trades away future picks without charging interest. Time is a valuable commodity. And we can’t pretend that the passage of year doesn’t exist in order to apply a same-year draft standard to Smith, nor can we ignore the value of finding a experienced starter at CB before Goodman and Baily retire.
The use of expedient frames is evident in many of the posts. Frames are partly an arbitrary choice so the use of a negative frame reveals that the person is looking for a way of criticizing McX, which is more a choice on their part rather than a reaction to objective events. For example, the Broncos signed the #1 rated UDFA crop after the draft and the strength of that group was at CB. A possible interpretation of this is that McX were clever and hadn’t placed their eggs all in one basket, which is clearly true, they hadn’t. What many people chose to see was a sign of failure, since Tony Carter’s elevation from the PS could be taken as a reflection of what Smith wasn’t. In the “glass is half full/half empty” world of framing, the choice was to find the negative. There haven’t been any posts lauding McX’s foresight at obtaining help at CB through college free agency, nor have there been any posts applauding McX’s ability to find a 5-time pro bowler at CB who still had something left in the tank. Again, to reiterate, the choice was to attack Smith and ignore the cut of Jack Williams, as if his cut was somehow irrelevant yet Smith’s performance was, even though he remained on the roster while Williams didn’t.
no goats, no glory.
By the way,
I agree with yall on the point that it takes 2 or 3 years to judge players but it doesn’t take that long to judge every player. Steve Atwater was great from early on in his rookie season. He was making plays all over the place and that is what worries me about Smith and Ayers-you have to look real hard to notice when they are in the game because they rarely make a good play but seem to play a big part in giving up big plays. Smith should have made the tackle on the Raider wide receiver that made the winning touchdown play Sunday but he didn’t and Ayers has made only 1 big play all year that I can remember and that was picking up a fumble for a huge return. Like I said, I hope Smith and Ayers turn out to be great but so far they are “busts” and I still think Moreno will be a great running back.
And there are players like Steve that come out ever year,
but they are few and in between. It takes time to develop players in a new system, and soe who come out of college and profit right away are the ones who came out of the same type of system generally. Not saying all though and there are the rare play every once in a while you just have to say, wow, that guy is awesome. Troy Palomalu’s are rare, Steve Atwater was rare.
by bfree2bronc on Dec 25, 2009 11:16 AM MST up reply actions
physical talent V. knowledge of the system
Here’s a diagnostic question: Is Smith overmatched physically or has he had mental errors?
Most of what we’ve been talking about regarding the 2009 draft is a learning process that requires time. There’s no guarantee the any of the draftees will ultimately emerge as a star but there’s a difference between a draft pick who’s physical ability was mis-judged by scouts and a player who’s struggling to function within a scheme that has levels of complexity well beyond anything he was acquainted with in college.
All of the 2009 Broncos draftees who have played have shown that they possess physical skills. The fact that they have played — even if it’s only on STs — shows that the staff has some confidence in them. Errors can be corrected, it’s when they stop correcting you that you need to worry. There aren’t many obvious busts who’ve been revealed so far in the NFL’s 2009 draft. And the ones who have shown problems, such as Darrius Heyward-Bey, have shown the same problems that scouts saw in them initially.
The point of the mental V. physical distinction is that mistakes can be corrected and schemes can be learned. Players who are willing to learn can master their position & scheme through hard work. It’s the players who lack a work ethic or are in some way resistant to learning that are bust candidates. And that’s not considering the physical misfits — who are in some way not physically capable of playing their position.
BTW — do you suppose Cutler qualifies as an intransigent learner now?
no goats, no glory.
Ayers has been VERY good...you need to wtch him closer Rob. I agree on Smith, but Ayers is a bees dick away from a break out game!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
BTW
He’s learning from two of the best; Champ & Goodman. Wait and see he’s a big time player and will be for many years I hope in Orange & Blue.
oc60
AS hasn’t played enough snaps to determine if he can become a good player. He needs more time and more reps to get familiar with the speed of the league. He shows some flashes and the fact that he has good instintcs gives him the opportunity to be a true playmaker. This year unfortunately is a bit of a write off for him, but the experience he has received will be very valuable for years to come.
Then again..I thought Jack was showing similar signs and he got cut….
Rey
Does anyone not remember exactly why Rey dropped in the draft?
There are three main issues that were raised. First is that some of his behavior was childish and even troubling, including the nation TV incident that bordered on sexual harassment. Since that happened at the end of the season and made the national news, lots of scouts perked up their ears. Then there were the reports that he had to have a ‘sitter’ when the team was on the road. I never thought that was proven, but the rumor certainly was active. He had a fighting incident or two in college – they didn’t help the matter.
Second,. Rey was pegged as a two down player. I never agreed with this one, but many folks were very forthright with the opinion that he wasn’t a third down guy. I think that he’s proven them wrong, but that was also a common comment.
First, the team believed that Andra Davis and Mario Haggan would do well and that DJ would love his new slot. He’s leading the team in tackles and he has, overall, played well. Davis has been a wonderful surprise and Haggan has joined Doom, Reid and Ayers on the OLB. All are playing well. But Rey is a MLB and we don’t run a 4-3. Even more so, Rey was not known as a disciplined player. McD and Nolan would not have that on their team.
I’m glad for Rey that he’s played well. I liked him them, I like him now, but he was, without question, a risk. The fact that this risk has turned out well doesn’t mean that hindsight is useful or that he would fit our scheme. Neither is true.
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
by Doc Bear on Dec 25, 2009 10:37 PM MST reply actions 1 recs

by 































