Free Agency and the Cap Rules
There are a lot of very well thought discussions on who should stay, who should go, who we need, and who we don't need. In fact it seems to me that there are more good ideas regarding the Broncos roster on MHR than in the entire MSM. Aren't they supposed to be the pros? What does seem to be missing from some of these discussions are the salary cap issues. In the past the Broncos were not always salary cap savy, but all signs point to a new Broncos front office and personnel group that are going to be be very cap saving. Based on that let's look at how cap issues might frame some of these dicussions.
Before I get into it, MattR posted a great introduction to the cap here.
One of the key considerations for every NFL team, heading into the FA period, is the roster cap. Team can only carry 80 players on their roster heading into camp. The Broncos are currently at 72 and have 9 draft picks. So in order to bring in any new FAs, someone is going to be dropped.
Cap Situation
By my calculation the Broncos currently sit with about $92mill against the salary cap. Current estimates are that the 2009 salary cap will be around $123mill. That would seem to leave the Broncos with about $30mill to work with in FA, but they probably need to keep about $9-10mill in reserve to sign the draft class.
There are also several current players who may be released to free up roster space. Of course any of the subs or STers are at risk. In addition, Robertson, Manuel, Winborn, K2, Boss, & Engelberger could all be released if cap space is needed. This could free up another $6-8mill.
Bronco Free Agents
Probably the most important Bronco free agent isn't even a free agent. The retirement of Tom Nalen (UFA) and the performance of Casey Weigman are going to push the Broncos to sign Weigman to a starting contract. Expect something in the $4-5mill range.
The remaining FAs fall into 3 categories: Keepers - players we will try to re-sign, Goners - players we no longer want, & Tweeners - players we may keep is the price is right.
The Goners
McCree and Webster are certainly gone. Webster has already been given permission to talk to other teams. McCree just doesn't earn his pay and there are too many better options at safety this year. If Ramsey were paid more he would also be in this category. Paymah may be here or he may be a tweener depending on how the new coaching staff evaluates his performance.
Keepers
The only keepers I think we have are Ekuban because he does produce some pass rush and Tatum Bell because he is cheep and may fit well with McD's new offensive schemes.
Tweeners
There are too many here to list then all, but the key ones are: D Jackson, Pittman, and possibly Paymah. Jackson provided valuable depth at WR last year, but his $1.5 mill salary was a bit high for essentially a #4 WR. The team will probalby look at who else is avaialble in the draft and FA and decide how much they really want to pay for a #4. Pittman was productive when he was healthy, but his role would probably be reduced to short yardage. While he cost less than $1mill, he may become a casualty of numbers. The team will only be willing to carry so many RBs. Andre Hall is probably also in the group. He isn't paid much, but I'm not sure how much he adds either.
Other FAs
When all is said and done, I don't expect the Broncos to be especially active in the FA market this year. For one, once you look at all the numbers, they don't have as much cap space to work with as it looks like initially. Also, I think PB has grown tired of FA failures. In addition, this team is at least two, if not three years from a deep playoff run. It just makes more sense to rebuild a solid core through the draft, then use FA to add the final pieces for a deep run when we're ready.
Having said that, I do expect the Broncos to look for a solid DT and help at free safety this year. While it doesn't look like Haynesworth will be available there are a number of other candidates at DT. Who the team looks at at DT may give us some indications of what direction the defense is heading.Do we look at a Gabe Watson NT type or do we go for a more traditional Rocky Bernard type?
There is a particularly promising group of safeties out there as well. Given our weakness at safety the last two years, and a relatively weak draft class at S, I expect us to bring in at least one if not more safeties. Candidates include aged veterans like Brian Dawkins or Lawyer Mallow, or rising stars such as Yerimiah Bell or Sean Jones.
Bly, Bailey, Willimas
While we're talking Cap, a lot of posters have expressed the idea that we should trade or cut these high priced veterans. Looking at cap figures these three players take up $26.6mill (Bailey - $13.2, Bly - $6.8, DJ - $6.6). On the surface it would seem to make sense if we're entering a rebuilding phase and not just reloading.
Cap rules chage this completely. Think about it, how often do you read about NFL players getting traded? Compared to MLB or NBA very rarely. It's because of the cap rules. Most good players get a signing bonus when they sign a contract; these bonuses are often more than 50% of the contract value. In order to accomodate this practive, up front bonuses are spread out over the life of the contract. But, if a player is cut or traded all the bonusses that were paid out but not counted against the cap are then counted against the cap in the year fo the trade. So let's look at these three players.
Bly
3/28/2007: Signed a five-year, $33 million contract. The deal contains $18 million in bonuses. $16 million is guaranteed, including a $9 million "signing bonus" in the second year. 2009-2010: $3.25 million, 2011: $4 million, 2012: Free Agent
Bly's cap hit for 2009 is $6.8mill. But if he's traded there's over $9million in bonus that are charged against the cap. It costs more to trade him than to keep him. More likely the Broncos might bring some competition into camp, see who performs, and possible cut or trade Bly next year if he doesn't play up to expcectations.
Bailey
3/3/2004: Signed a seven-year, $63 million contract. The deal contains $23 million guaranteed, including an $18 million signing bonus. 2009: $6.5 million, 2010: $9.5 million, 2011: Free Agent
Champ is actually the highest paid CB in the league for now. He represent a $13.2 mill hit against the cap and hasn't been collecting interceptions at the rate we've come to expect. The Broncs could try to trade Champ but with Robinson and Asumugha as FAs why would a team trade? On top of that, a trade will still cost a $10mill hit. The team may extend his contract or renegotiate, but a trade doesn't seem likely.
DJ Williams
9/6/2008: Signed a six-year, $32 million contract. The deal includes $13 million guaranteed. 2009: $4.1 million, 2010: $3 million, 2011: $4.9 million, 2012: $5 million, 2013: $6 million, 2014: Free Agent
Of all the players on the team, DJ is the least likely to be traded. The team just signed a long term deal last year. While he costs $6.6mill against the cap if we keep him, he would almost $11mill to cut or trade. That's the kind of cap suicide that detroys teams.
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
25 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
SWG
did you take the Cap rollover trick into account?
How much under were we last year cause we could have another 10+ mill…..
Crap I forgot about that....
that does gives us some more cap room.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 15, 2009 11:06 AM MST up reply actions
Several sites list the Broncos...
at about $34million under the cap. Assuming they need to keep $9million available to sign their draft class that gives them about $25million to work with in FA.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 15, 2009 8:58 PM MST up reply actions
I did this calculation on another thread, I know I dont know as much as you on the cap, but where did I go wrong?
Blys contract
3/28/2007: Signed a five-year, $33 million contract. The deal contains $18 million in bonuses. $16 million is guaranteed, including a $9 million "signing bonus" in the second year. 2009-2010: $3.25 million, 2011: $4 million, 2012: Free Agent
16 million $ bonus over 5 years….1.8mil a year for signing bonus…….1.4 a year in guaranteed money.
so if hes cut now in 08 season we pay 3*1.8=5.4million +1.4 =6.8million and then 1.4 for the next 3 years.
if hes traded its 5.4million and the guaranteed money gets taken over by the other team
if he stays as is it is 6.45 million
Here's how I calculated Bly...
He has already been paid $16.5mill in bonuses + $2mill in salary.
The team has counted $9.35 mill against cap.
$9.35mill – $2mill = $7.35mill in bonuses counted against cap.
$16.5mill – $7.35mill = $9.15mill in bonus against cap if cut.
If he’s traded the whole amount counts in 2009. If he’s cut after June 1 it can be spread over 2009 and 2010.
I don’t think the future bonuses count because they haven’t been earned yet.
But that’s why NFL Teams have a team of lawyers and accountants to track this crap.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 15, 2009 11:17 AM MST up reply actions
how does guaranteed money work?
Are these correct?
1.guaranteed money gets transferred over to a traded team
2.guaranteed money does not accelerate to the year the player is cut and counts against the cap for the remainder of the contract years
I am not entirely sure...
What I think is:
Guaranteed money that has already been paid counts against the cap of the team that trades the player away.
If the team that the player is traded to takes over their contract then the bonuses count against their cap.
But, if the teams that trades the player away buys out their contract, then the bonuses count against the original team’s cap.
So it seems like it depends on the terms of the trade.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 15, 2009 2:03 PM MST up reply actions
If we ARE going to trade/cut any of those players, it ought to be this season
As you point out, Bowlen isn’t likely to spend all $30+ million of our cap room this year. So if we WANT to get rid of Bly, or get draft picks for Bailey or DJ, it would have to be in a year when we didn’t mind taking the cap hit.
I’m not advocating getting rid of any of the 3, but since we have as much cap space as we do, it IS possible.
That's what the third option is about....
One cap strategy would be to cut or trade any players who don’t fit our long term strategy and just take the hit now. At first I dismissed this option, but the more I think about it the more merit it has.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 15, 2009 11:18 AM MST up reply actions
I don't know why, but I didn't see the poll
I think we ought to cut/trade Bly just to get him off the books long term. As for D.J. and Bailey, I can’t bring myself to think we should get rid of them, but it wouldn’t be the end of the world if we did. All this in the name of open cap space next year, when, presumably, we’ll be closer to contending.
We will sign Champ to a new deal
I don’t think there is any way that Champ, as good as he is, will eat up that much of our cap space. I see us getting a new deal done with him, if not, I expect him to be traded.
Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960
Do you think we can restructure Blys contract again?
he`d probably still be making more than if we cut him
I don't think it would do much good...
He’s already been paid the bonus money ($16.5mill) so all we could do is extend the contract to decrease the amount of cap hit each year. To me that seems to just be postponing the inevitable. Next year (2010) might make more sense. To me, it was a dumn contract for the Broncos to sign in the first place, but we seemed to do a lot of that on defense.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 15, 2009 2:08 PM MST up reply actions
Both Blye and Champ, SHOULD, restructure this year, based upon two things.
Neither produced what thier sallaries indicated should be produced! If they want to win “the ring”, they need to give room for the associated tallent that we need to bring in!
It is better to keep silent, and appear to be wise, then to ramble on and remove all doubt! The Wisest Man, Solomon.
Metalman you made a great point
The main difference between Elway and Marino later in their careers? Look at this…the quote is from Sports Illustrated…
By agreeing to restructure his contract, Elway saved the team $3.1 million against the salary cap for this season and provided the room to sign (Neil) Smith. As a result Elway’s base salary this year will be less than $600,000, making him one of the league’s lowest-paid starting quarterbacks.
Meanwhile Marino was the highest paid player on the Dolphins in ’98 & ’99
Year Player Cap Hit Base Salary
1999 Dan Marino $5,500,000 $4,700,000
1998 Dan Marino $7,141,700 $6,000,000
Sometimes to win a ring you have to give back a little.
"I am not trying to start anything I am just saying that i think if you take Knowshon and draft D later you guys will be hella good next year" ...IamtheGreatest - The smartest Chiefs fan I ever had the priviledge of reading!
Thatz what a true pro does my friend. What a class act John was.
If you want to get to the HOF, its hard enough in Denver but almost impossible, without at least one ring!
It is better to keep silent, and appear to be wise, then to ramble on and remove all doubt! The Wisest Man, Solomon.
by metalman5050 on Feb 15, 2009 5:40 PM MST up reply actions
It has nothing to do with Champ or Bly...
The problem is the way their previous contracts were structured. Take Bly: he has already received $16.5 million in bonuses, $9 million of which hasn’t been assigned to the cap. Even if he restructures his contract the bonuses still have to be counted. It just not that simple.
BTW: The broncos were fined a lot of money and lost draft pick over the cap shenanigans in the late 90s.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 15, 2009 6:20 PM MST up reply actions
Take a few cap hits
SWG – great post, always well informed and rec’d.
I don’t see Champ getting traded any time soon for all the reasons spelt out in this post and in Natural Wonder’s post here. If anything, Champ will restructure and like they do in NE, McD will focus on getting the best out of a proven vet whilst bringing on draft talent.
As a general comment on free agency strategies I have to admit I agreed with Shanahan trying to shore up positions in the short-term whilst drafting for the long term – and look how that turned out. Almost to a man last season’s FAs were either busts, wound up on IR or both as we overpaid and over-evaluated talent. With McD at the helm we should go some way to fixing problems with player evaluation.
Personally, I’d be inclined to stay out of FA unless someone becomes available at the right price and take a few caps hits – McCree, Webster, Manuel, Winborn, K2, Boss, & Engelberger – to clear the dead wood and free up some roster spots.
That is one of the options...
I think a very bold move would be to use our cap space this year to clean house. The more I think about it, the better it sounds. As for the players you mention, McCree and Webster are both FAs so I think they’re gone. I also think K2 & Engelberger will be cut. Winborn isn’t paid that mmuch so they will probably keep him around until camp. Boss I don’t know about. when healthy he’s a quality player, but injuries have been an issue his entire career.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 16, 2009 11:05 AM MST up reply actions
Great comments crush....
Speaking purely from a roster stand point, and not a monetary stand point, we need roster spots for players that are multi skilled, not one trick, one scheme ponies like the guys you mentioned.
The only one worth keeping is Boss if he restructures as I like his speed and build as a OLB in a 3-4.
The other guys. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
The "Right Stuff"
Thanks.
I can’t remember who said it on MHR – but the idea was that we’d be unlikely to do any significant FA business until the team was ready for a deep run into the post season, which means a few more years of reloading/rebuilding through the draft.
With that in mind, I have a feeling that McD will try and hang onto the vets – Weigman, Pittman and Ekuban – because there’s no substitute for guys who know about professionalism, attitude and getting over the winning line every week. The “Right Stuff” is going to be crucial in a locker room full of guys who’ve mostly done 4 or less years in the NFL. The next round of cuts will show where this is all going….
Great point, OC
Creating a balance between leaders, vets and young players – some of who will lead and some of whom will follow but all of whom need mentoring – is a wonderful alchemy, and only a few clubs achieve it consistently. The Broncos did for a long time, the Steelers still do, and NE has been a leader in that regard. McD learned fromsome of the best. I’m hopeful. We have some great vets, including Champ, Ek (who is a FA) and Weigmann. Sometimes their value isn’t entirely on the field, and the best coaches know that.
Hillis in '09
I get the sense that PB is trying to model the new Broncos...
after the Steelers and Patriots. It’s hard to argue that those two teams have set the standard for excellence since 2000. What really impresses me as how well they both do with roster management. They rarely reach in the draft or overpay in free agency. They seem to take the view that building a great team is the result of making consistently GOOD personnel decisions versus making a few GREAT decisions.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 16, 2009 11:09 AM MST up reply actions

by 


























