As purging continues, Broncos need to consider ALL options
The Broncos have trimmed the fat, and now are starting to trim some bone. Seven players the past 2 days. Four of them were defensive starters and another was signed as a free agent to be a starter. Needless to say, it has left some holes and signals that the Broncos are in transition on the field after a ton of instability off it.
With $25 million in cap space, 9 draft picks in April, and several available openings, Denver will likely be a desired location for the free agent crop this spring. How much of that money the Broncos will actually spend remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that new G.M. Brian Xanders and Head Coach Josh McDaniels are setting about changing the culture of the team from the inside out. The only question I have is how far will they actually go?
Back in October, I raised what I thought was a fair question. Should the Broncos consider moving arguably their best player, Champ Bailey, if the deal is right? The outlash was severe, as I expected it to be, but it was a fair statement. Bailey is likely looking for 1 more big contract, and with 2 years remaining on his deal the request to restructure is only a matter of time. As Bailey sat out much of the middle and latter parts of the season with a groin injury, the sentiment to investigate a trade involving Bailey grew. After missing the playoffs, firing most of the coaching staff and front office and cutting most of the veteran presence on defense, the question in my mind, is more pertinent than ever.
Simply put, the Broncos would be foolish NOT to take a look at moving Bailey. Not just for themselves, but for Champ as well. Now before you start with the comments, I will say this. We do not know if Champ even wants to be moved. He may be perfectly happy playing for a team that is transitioning to younger players, a new scheme on both sides of the ball, along with a new coaching staff. If that is the case, so be it. I am fine with it. I also know Bailey desperately wants to play for a Super Bowl, and the clock is ticking.
When listening to and reading about Brian Xanders' press conference on Monday, I took notice that the Broncos are still looking to stockpile draft picks. Along with the 9 this year, the Broncos possess 8 in 2010. The correct way to build a team is through the draft, and besides, having multiple draft picks provides a team with flexibility should they want to make a move and get a player they want, rookie or otherwise. If Bailey were to net, let's say, a 2nd-round pick in 2009 and a 4th-rounder in 2010, would you take it?
Part of the problem lies with the ghosts of drafts past for Denver. With 2008 being the exception, us fans have not had a lot to cheer about when it comes to draft picks. Hell, the Broncos got into this mess in the first place because of their failures in the draft, forcing Mike Shanahan to overpay free agents. With team "McXanders" at the helm, my hope is that will change for the better and the Broncos will do it the right way. I have faith, because Josh McDaniels learned from the best -- Bill Belichick and Scott Pioli. They used the draft to their advantage, hoarding draft picks when necessary, dealing them when necessary. Look no further than 2008, when the Pats still had a Top-15 pick even though they lost their 1st-rounder as punishment for "Spy-Gate". That pick netted New England LB Jarod Mayo, and all he did was win NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year.
That kind of "draft manipulation" is what I am looking for from McXanders and why the Broncos need to at least think about moving Champ.
There are financial issues to consider, and the backlash from a fan base still shocked over what has already transpired, but the Broncos have gone young - on the field and off - and their outlook is long-term. That doesn't mean losing, it means that every move made now is done with one eye towards the future, an uncertain future in and out of the NFL.
227 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Couldn't agree with you more...
I’ve followed Champ’s career when I lived in DC with the Skins and was thrilled when we traded for him. He’s a future HOF and a guy that any team would kill to have. That being said, player loyalty can make you lose sight to your ultimate goal—fielding playoff teams that compete for Super Bowls. If the value is right, move Champ. I rather us invest in building a true D-line and usher in the Jack Williams era…
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
Do what's best for the team.
In this case, trading Champ may be the right answer—if the return in draft picks is right. I’d take a 2009 2nd and a 2010 4th for Champ. I trust that Xanders and McDaniels know what to do when drafting and using draft picks in trades.
"If we never try, we shall never succeed." - Abraham Lincoln
Purple Row - Covering all your Rockies needs!
I voted no...
…simply because I don’t think that we will get enough value in return for the leadership and level of play that he offers. I think that you’re about right on what we could expect to get for him (2nd and 4th in different years) as opposed to all the speculation of extra first rounders for eternity that you see floated when this subject comes up.
I also believe that there is value in keeping your one great player through a transition to a new regime. Besides being able to mentor some of the young guys, they have a place to rally their emotion and someone to be accountable to for their play. If we keep Champ and make a serious run in 2010 or 2011 you’ll start seeing the young guys use ‘win one for Champ’ as an extra edge. Maybe it sounds silly a bit, but there are reasons why guys feel the need to play these head games to get themselves motivated.
I agree
the leadership is way too valuable. Remember how lost our defense looked last year when Lynch got hurt? his leadership was (and still is) sorely missed. We have not looked good as a defense since we lost him. This team cannot afford to lose another veteran leader who has the confidence and experience to guide the young players.
Of course it's worth investigating
Nothing ventured nothing gained!
If Champ is willing and the offer is right (except for anything from any AFC West team – especially the faders) we should pull the trigger (for both of our sakes).
"It's all over Fat Man" - Tom Jackson to John Madden 1977 AFC Championship Game
"tough times don't last, tough people do" - Mike "The Mastermind" Shanahan
by DesertBroncoFan on Feb 18, 2009 8:56 AM MST reply actions
I voted yes....BUT
we should not move YOUNG for the sake of moving young. We are not the Chiefs. We will need to keep some of our veterans around, especially the talented ones. Though I’d consider trading Champ if the price is right…like for a first rounder this year and a second next year….anything less would seem a waste to me.
The problem I have with Champ is that he is getting hurt more often and it is irritating to pay a guy $10 million a year for half a season. Then again, he is getting hurt because he has to chase down and tackle more and more running backs because the rest of the team isn’t able to bring them down. In that regard, I cannot really blame Champ for getting hurt more on the horrible defense we have.
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
There were KC comparisons in the Bly post yesterday too,
and I don’t buy them. We have a franchise QB and they do not. Even if we scrap our defense and go very young like KC did, we will not go 4-12. Maybe we go 7-9 next year, but we’ll be much better for it down the road with an infusion of young talent on the defensive side of the ball. In addition, I think McDanials and Xandars will target a couple veterans in FA to help with leadership.
"Choose the sword, and you will join me. Choose the ball and you join your mother, in death. You don’t understand my words, but you must choose. So… come boy, choose life or death."
I'm down for whatever at this point...
if you want to blow it up, blow it up. I hope we somehow get two first round picks— take a franchise RB at 12, and a front-seven player in the 18 – 24 range (Laurinaitis?, Cushing?). If packaging Champ and another draft pick gets us back into the mid-first round, then I would be all for it.
My pipe dream right now for defense is aquireing four new, talented guys on the front seven— i.e., Laurinaitis, Canty, Scott, and Watson— to go along with our current talented guys— Thomas, DOOM, and DJ. Throw in a second round safety, a moderatly cheap corner in FA, a couple second day front-seven depth picks, and better coaching, and the defense will be much improved in 2009.
"Choose the sword, and you will join me. Choose the ball and you join your mother, in death. You don’t understand my words, but you must choose. So… come boy, choose life or death."
I’m with you Guru!I posted this same story Sunday,and slow white guy,and others had alot too say.Guess that’s why he’s slow lol hehehe!People need too open their mind’s,and see how pretty we would be sitting for year’s to come off this 1 trade.You guy’s are plenty crazy if you don’t think some team out there would’nt be ready to deal for Champ.Any one who claim’s they know football should know this!!!!
Natural Wonder
What I said was....
Your numbers were wrong and I doubted you would find a team to take over Champ’s contract AND give you the draft picks you thought you could get. It doesn’t hurt to shop around but I doubt you will find any takers given that Asomugha and Robinson are available as free agents.
Ask yourself, if you are a GM and you can sign Asomugha (or even Robinson) as a FA or trade for Champ which move makes more sense? Now if Asomugha and Robinson are both tagged maybe someone will bite on Champ, but it’s doubtful. The debate over keeping or trading players makes for interesting discussion but there are practical realities.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 10:26 AM MST up reply actions
I forgot...
McAllister is available too. That’s a lot of FA competition.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 10:36 AM MST up reply actions
+1, SWG
Exactly. Exploring a trade shouldn’t be off limits, but you’ve got to know the market as well. Thinking you can command the market just because he’s Champ Bailey when you’ve got some other CB’s of arguably even greater value already on the FA market is myopic, not to mention just plain pie-in-the-sky silly.
“Any one who claim’s they know football should know this!!!!”
aka MN Bronco
Yes, but just to have a look-see
I love the idea of building through the draft. Love it. I also love the concept of stockpiling draft choices and flooding the roster with hungry, young talent. However, there is a point where you can have too much youth. There need to be some veteran leaders, and at this point Champ is the only one (DJ is not a leader and Doom does not play enough to be a leader). A defense comprised almost completely of rookies and imported free agents does not sound like a good idea to me.
Considering Champ’s contract, I am skeptical that a 2nd and 4th-rounder could be attained, but I suppose it can’t hurt to find out. A first-rounder is outside the realm of possibility.
by Douglas A. Lee on Feb 18, 2009 9:11 AM MST reply actions 1 recs
Thats assuming that we do nothing in FA....also remember our best leaders last year were rookies in WW and Larsen!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
I did say “imported free agents.” My point was that the defense probably shouldn’t be 11 new players, no matter how many are veterans.
by Douglas A. Lee on Feb 18, 2009 9:17 AM MST up reply actions
I would agree if we were even an average D but we plain sucked. We had no passion or leadership so I am OK with having TOTALLY new personell that suits the personality of the team, the concepr and the caoching.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
Even with imported guys, leaders will emerge...
especially if the X man and Jedi go after leadership guys in FA. Targeting aging leaders like Seau and Harrison was the NE’s MO, so maybe we’ll see a litte of that in FA. How huge would bringing a guy like Ray Lewis on to a young defense be??
"Choose the sword, and you will join me. Choose the ball and you join your mother, in death. You don’t understand my words, but you must choose. So… come boy, choose life or death."
Wow now that Guru said the same thing I said Sunday everyone’s on board now!You guy’s are sad,and pretty funny!!!lol.Remember the post The reason why we should Trade’ Champ Bailey?lol
Natural Wonder
Hey Natural, nothing is personal, so let it go...
Not everyone disagreed with you. This board is about discussion and we are not going to always agree. I dont think it has anything to do with Guru bringing it up, but it might have more to do with some other points that Guru makes.
I know a lot of us have been open to trading Champ, or at least looking at it. People have even floated trading DJ.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
I've also been saying it for months...
When I first brought it up on the podcast I was nearly scalped. No worries, NW
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
You were but there was poeple open to it as well.....I think with the way the cuts have been going we are seeing a bigger turnover than what we thought, and this lends to the idea of trading some of our higher profile D players!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
That reply was more for Natural Wonder...
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
boydy2669
I have to say that I agree with you that things should not be taken personally! One of the things I love about MHR is the posts and how they are written. I read other posts on other sites (ie DP and RMN) and just shake my head at how personal they take things.
The one thing we can agree on is that regaurdless of our opinions, we all want the Broncos to return to the true contenders we all know they can be.
To all on this site, Blessings on your families, and in all things, go Broncos!
-Strength and Honor!
by kybroncomaniac on Feb 18, 2009 9:49 AM MST up reply actions
Personally, I took issue with your assertion that Denver could receive a 1st-rounder in return for Champ. I am sticking with that opinion. Looking into trading Champ though, well it can’t hurt to look.
by Douglas A. Lee on Feb 18, 2009 9:19 AM MST up reply actions
And I agree with that.....
We wont get a 1st for Champ, and in a lot of ways having a 1st in this years draft is no great deal. Parlayed into extra picks as the draft is deep but not full of premium players would make more sense.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
Hey, I was with you back then too.....
I’ve been on board with a Champ trade since early in the season last year when the defense started going to crap. We weren’t all against you and as the poll indicates the sentiment isn’t all the way either way…about 50-50.
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
You should ask yourself why
Guru’s suggestion was taken more seriously. He’s the founder of the site, has published many respected pieces, and is respectful of other contributors. If you regularly make sense and otherwise show you’re worth listening to over a period of time, thus creating a track record; if you resist the urge to throw zingers (“Guess that’s why he’s slow lol hehehe”; “You guys are sad”) or crow; if you acknowledge and respectfully counter dissenting views – if you do all that people will look for your posts and will give them a sympathetic initial reading due to name recognition. Consider also the changed landscape once Bly was released. Even Guru encountered a backlash the first time he made this suggestion, and I don’t think he snickered at anyone nor is he crowing now. Learn the culture, respect others, don’t expect to be taken seriously until you’ve built a track record of thoughtful, intelligent posts, and you’ll find people looking forward to your posts and comments.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
Huh???
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
Well said...
MS: "I'm sorry Jake. I've decided to go another direction."
JP: "But...."
by Plummer's But on Feb 18, 2009 2:15 PM MST up reply actions
Really, any well researched and thought-out post will received great attention from this community...
regardless of how long the author has been a member of the site. I’ve see first time posters get rec’d to the top right away before even posting a comment or introducing themselves. It really isn’t about building a reputation, although that helps down the road so even if your post sucks it still gets attention because of possible well written past posts. lol Basically it comes down to this; if you present a quality post with well thought out ideas and opinions then the community will eat it up regardless of how long you have been a member of MHR.
Some of the greatest posts I have seen generated almost no comments nor debate. Of course we enjoy the debate and sharing of ideas, but really, most of us are here to get as much perspectives as possible in order to increase our own knowledge and mania over the Broncos. Which is why short one paragraph posts don’t typically get much of a response because we’re looking for depth and substance in posts. One paragraph can certainly do that, but typically it takes a bit more than that. ;-)
These are the kinds of things that make MHR the best in my opinion. Anyone and everyone has a fair shot at being heard and any idea is worth hearing…but MHR is not a message board. The comment section is the message board…the FanPosts are for serious, well-thought and in depth sharing of ideas or opinion. Only place I know of that has such a platform. :)
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
+1000000
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 3:17 PM MST up reply actions
agreed
-lots of great articles that are written to cover all points of attack lose out on great discussions because there are no disagreements to bring them out.
They are still great reads though. :)
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
It's all in the wording
Saying this is why we should trade Champ Bailey, is different then saying should we consider trading Champ Bailey. I bet that many of the same people that were against the statement, “we should trade Champ”, would agree with the statement “we should see what somebody’s willing to offer for Champ”. It’s all how you frame the issue.
Interesting...
I would take a 2nd and 4th no worries.
We could parlay these picks into a lot of great options for the future of our team.
I would trade Champ for Wilfork even, grab a guy like Bartells or Robinson, and play JMFW and Josh Bell and pick up a 1st or 2nd round CB.
I will be equally stoke if Champ stays, but I can guarentee you that the Dr X and Jedi are looking at all options….we are silly not to!
Lets remember that the Patriots got Randy Moss for a 4th….this is who Jedi has been trained by!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
Got you boydy2669.Just making sure my point’s heard to bud.Just having a little fun!!
Natural Wonder
O.K.
I voted no (knee jerk reaction) because all this time and theough all the changes I have been thinking about the 09 season and the fact that I dont want it to be a total throw away. But as I thought about it more I had a hapithany, just how much worse could the defense be? The answer is not much! There is really not that much room to be any worse on defense than we were last season. The fact is we could probably feild an entire defense of rookies and not do any worse and maybe be better so in total retrospect I say go for it get what ya can for him and move on. Hell just go ahead blow it up (the defense) and start all over, because the truth of the matter is I think we well still be better in the 09 season no matter what we do.
Great comments Bust...
We need to remember this is essentially a new team….there is no loyalty to the past. If this was a normal business and we had one side of the business perfroming great (O) and the other side sucking and causing losses (D) you would come in and totally tear down the bad sisde of the business and rebuild it….thats wahts going on. You have no loyalties to the guys or practices that put the business in the tank in the first place. in fact, you want to get rid of all evidence and ties to it and start a fresh.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
We cant be worse?
I thought the same thing last offseason about the 07 defense and then we ended up being worse. We can definitely be worse. I agree with your first sentance. I dont want 09 to be a throw away season. I want to compete and I think having Champ makes this team much better than what a 2nd rounder and a 4th in 10 would bring
by purplesocks on Feb 18, 2009 10:02 AM MST up reply actions
Ummmmm
Did you take a look at our defensive stats last year? Yes we could get worse but very little room to get much worse! Hell we were at the bottom of every defensive stat in the book. If you think that going from 27th to 30th in a certain area is a huge drop then you would be right but to me that seems pretty inconsiquential in the entire outlook. I dont know maybe I am wrong but like the old saying goes to make an ommlett you have to break a few eggs!
by broncosorbust on Feb 18, 2009 10:47 AM MST up reply actions
How much worse could the defense be?
If we fielded an all-rookie team I guarantee you’d find out. I thought the 2008 defense would be better because it couldn’t get any worse. Then it did. Nonetheless I agree, if a little bit more cautiously, that we need to make big changes and, more to the point, it looks like Xanders and McDaniels do, too.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
Smart Decision
I think you look into the option starting with talking with Champ. What does he want? Where does he see things going for him (move to FS?)? If he wants big money to stay then now is the time to trade him to someone with a need. If he is a team guy and wants to play Bronco football from here on out, then there is no way you trade him.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
I love the idea,
there was a little smile on Xanders face when Bailey’s name came up from one of the media guys.. I think he will be atleast shopped, maybe a draft day trade, guess we’ll see. One thing is for certain, his best football is behind him and that ten million is pretty juicy – there’s nothing wrong with starting all over on defence, who would potentially be interested in aquiring Bailey?
Quarterhorse....
I think just about everyone would be interested in getting Bailey. I think the bigger question is what would other teams be willing to give for him.
i do not want to see bailey go…. but I am also realistic enough to know that for the right price, McJedi would probably move him.
We’ll just have to wait and see, huh?
My Angle
I come at it from this way….Just how much of a leader can a guy be from the CB position? That is why I have always been an advocate of a strong linebacking corp. D-Line can be a little too close to the ball to lead, DBs too far away. You look at the stud defenses in the NFL, and they have a stud linebacker leading the way.
That isn’t to say that DBs aren’t leaders, but they are usually surrounded with a vocal leader at the LB position —
Ed Reed has Ray Lewis
Polamalu has Harrison, Larry Foote
I know those guys are safeties, and perhaps that proves my point. There are just so many layers that go into the impact a CB can have on the game — QB pressure, gameplan, etc. Hell, a team can decide simply not to throw or run Champ’s way.
I just don’t put much stock into the “leader” argument. Case in point, the defense was never the same after Al Wilson got hurt, with or without Champ.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
what is the minimum you would trade champ for?
and doesnt taking away one side of the field be a huge benefit? if you know that a team isnt going to champs side you can gameplan your defense towards the other side. thats why I think the biggest problem our team has had on D these past couple of years has been the coaching
by purplesocks on Feb 18, 2009 10:06 AM MST up reply actions
Honestly...
I think that sentiment is the most over-used, overrated in football. Not you, but the idea of a “shut-down corner”. A defense needs to dictate to an offense what it is going to ALLOW it to do. Not the other way around. I would much rather have a team take away what an offense does best.
Unfortunately for the Broncos, they simply don;t have the personnel to make that happen, right now at least. I’m not saying we should dump Bailey by any stretch, but we shouldn’t keep him simply because he’s Champ Bailey either.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
Talented players are better than leaders
Leadership is a terrible black box. I’ll grant that it can matter in football (unlike baseball, where it’s a magic quality that somehow seems to reside only in white guys of modest talents), but from our point of view as outsiders, it’s not much of a basis for evaluating players. We know when they make tackles, hit their gaps, or blow their assignments. But when we say someone is a leader or exerts a positive influence on the team, it’s just bar-stool guesswork.
Maybe Al Wilson made a difference through force of personality. It could be; we don’t know. What we do know is that he flew around the middle of the field like a mad man and did an admirable job making for for limitations in the talent and scheme around him.
Wouldnt Champ shutting down one side of the field dictatating things?
Your forcing the opposing offense into playing on only one side of the field thus ‘dictating’ what they are going to do. And if they try to throw at Champ, well just ask Matt Leinart where that gets you.
I dont believe that Champ has lost a step. One year he gets injured and its over reaction time. Now if someone blows us away with an offer then yes I would trade Champ but not for a 2nd and a 4th.
Im not even going to go into the leadership thing because on that point I agree with you Guru. I believe that it is hard for a CB to be a leader on the field. Off it is another thing but im mainly concerned with what happens on the field. What Im talking about here is pure talent. And Champ is the most talented player on this team that I just dont think we can replace with two draft picks.
Finally, like Slow pointed out below this post, Champs trade value is pretty low. If we are going to talk about trading him lets give him a year to boost his value, help this team out, and then maybe we can get higher picks next year.
by purplesocks on Feb 18, 2009 10:56 AM MST up reply actions
Unfortunately Not...
Formation dictates. Again, this isn’t about Champ, or how good he is or isn’t. This is about personnel as a whole and getting the best 11 players on the field that will create the best defense. The New England Patriots won a Super Bowl with 3rd and 4th round picks, rookies, starting at CB a few years ago. Why? Because their Front-7 dictated. DE’s and LB’s dictate, CBs do not.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
Maybe a point to consider
is that no corner can shut down half the field if the QB has all day to find a receiver. It seems to me being able to take away half the field is a real benefit, but one that can only be realized with a decent pass rush and a shutdown corner. Without the former the latter is wasted potential. A pass completed six or seven second into the play (against Bailey) rather than three (against a less-skilled replacement) is still a completion.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
I agree....
And that isn;t likely to change. So why put so much money into that position, should the opportunity arise to improve other areas of the football team??
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
I guess it depends in part on McDaniels' and Xanders'
estimate of how long it will take to get a decent pass rush, how long (and if) Bailey is able to play at a high level, what his pay demands are, how much he’s willing to leave on the table if he buys into McDaniels/Xanders being his best chance for a superbowl, etc. I think Bailey has at least six years left at a pro bowl or near pro bowl level, and more years than that of being well above average. Lots of questions to which I don’t have answers, which is why I’m willing to consider your scenario. If the Broncos do move Bailey I think it’ll more likely be in trade for a player at a position of greater need, such as nose tackle. Would I trade even up for Vince Wolfork? You bet. Or maybe a team might have a young backup NT they’d part with plus a fourth or fifth round draft choice in order to get Bailey.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
another reason i dont want to trade champ
dont we want to compete next year? i mean, champ is our best player on defense. if we want to blow it all up and have a rebuilding year then i see the wisdom in trading champ but if we want to compete, which i sure as hell do, then i want champ here instead of a couple draft picks who might turn out decent down the road.
It depends on what you expect from Champ
The one we had in 2005 or the one we have seen in 07 and 08. Not all of it is his fault, mind you, but for a player to be truly great he needs solid talent around him. Will he have that in Denver next year?
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
It's all in your outlook.
I for one think we will have the talent, the scheme, the coaching that we will see a great improvement.
Saying to trade champ because we won’t have the talent around him to compete, is basically laying down and dying. No need to do that just yet…
by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Feb 19, 2009 1:11 AM MST up reply actions
I don't think Champ shuts anything down....he gets burned just like any corner.
He is like a family business that is living on its reputation to succeed.
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
Champs R Us... :)
but that’s the nature of the DB position… It’s always strange to hear people call DBs shut-down corners. A good DB, which I think Champ is, provides consistent coverage, rarely bite on routes or fakes, and can actually catch a football for an INT when the opportunity arrises. The best DBs have short memories, again something I think Champ has. But, as has been mentioned many times before, 1 stud DB will never solve our apathetic defensive line and sub-par LB corp.
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Feb 18, 2009 12:11 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Completely agree, Guru
Just how much of a leader can a guy be from the CB position?
Champ isn’t outspoken like a Lewis or a Porter. He doesn’t strike me as a big rah-rah guy in the locker room or on the sideline, either, although he may have tried to offer something there from time to time.
With Champ, it’s much more about how you carry yourself on the field (something he wasn’t able to do a lot this year). In that respect, he’s aligned much more as a Jerry Rice type, I think. Anyone remember Rice ever firing up his team with a lights-out sideline speech? I don’t either. Not that it didn’t happen, but there’s sort of “a way” about these guys which is, simply, leading by production. And until we close the gap on that front seven, we really can’t expect that level of leadership from our amazing CB.
I’d be very sad to see him go, not just because he’s a class act but because he gives our young guys a level of professionalism to shoot for. I remember that year we got D-Will, Foxy, and Paymah, and how they were crediting him with inspiring them to contribute right away, which they did remarkably well. That level of leadership — being a premiere player at any position — is difficult to replace.
So, my personal opinion? Just a hunch, but I think I’d wait one year and see where the D line will is headed before talking trades. At that point, when it’s time to evaluate/negotiate, the trade factor may have more value, or it may not. But at least then we can make an informed decision rather than losing one of the league’s best as a potentially needless casualty to a youth movement.
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 3:33 PM MST up reply actions
Ironically, that is typical everywhere but in Denver during the 2007-2008 seasons.
Champ Bailey has always been a “leader” with his play not his talk. Shanny sort of forced him into a linebacker type of leadership role that he had never been asked to do in his entire football career. Champ IS A LEADER, just not the kind of leader we need. We need a Ray Lewis or Al Wilson type of leader who calls the plays. A man who is the unquestioned tough guy who knows the defense and calls the play…John Lynch filled a little of the void, but to be honest, he was too “uppity” off the field for him to be very effective in the locker room. Sure he was a tough guy, but I am not sure I would call him the leader of the defense.
Frighteningly, NATE WEBSTER was the leader of the defense last year…..which is why he didn’t lose his job to Larsen when he should have. (shudders)
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
I agree with this
Look at Urlacher in Chicago as well.
Who do you think fits the bill in this year’s draft, Zap? Rey Rey? Laurinitis?
aka MN Bronco
Rey Maualuga is a Ray Lewis type of leader as far as I can tell. He is the teams tough guy and knows the defense...
whether that translates into the pro level…well that is the crap shoot that is the NFL Draft.
James Laurinitis makes me think of Dan Morgan…..not Brian Urlacher. styg50 is the expert right now on these prospects…I don’t know anyone else around here who has spent as much time studying these college prospects than he.
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
Excellent points, Z.
We need a Ray Lewis or Al Wilson type of leader who calls the plays.
Totally! But once we have that player, and that front seven, wouldn’t it be nice to still have Champ? I guess that’s what I mean by waiting a year. I’d like to see how we’re trending before turning loose of that particular skill set.
But I am conflicted. I do recognize that Champ can’t be Champ forever, and youth movements take time. And I know a CB is really more of a deal sealer than a game changer. A veteran who is anything less than a special player (Bly) really has no value to us right now at CB. But the reality is that Champs don’t come around often. If he has two more years on his contract, I just think I’d prefer to wait one more year to let him loose, BUT with this caveat: so as long as he’s not preventing us from making other critical moves.
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 4:02 PM MST up reply actions
I think Champ is the rare athlete that doesn't see much of a drop off in production after 30.
I think he will be in the Top 10 among CB’s in the league for at least another 6-7 years. Question is, do we want to pay Champ Bailey $12 million a year for Top 10 production? I think he is worth it if we are able to repair the front 7…if our defense is still ranked near dead last in 2011…I don’t think he’ll be on this football team.
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
Absolutely positively unequivocally agree
Besides, I wouldn’t wish that scenario on him. I respect him too much to keep him around if we don’t improve.
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 4:12 PM MST up reply actions
I'm wondering if larsen can't be that leader.
he’s definitely that hitter your talking about. and from all accounts he was the leader for arizona in college.
by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Feb 19, 2009 1:14 AM MST up reply actions
I think it is worth looking into.............
What can it hurt. At this point our defense is as bad as it can be. Also I think every option should be looked at, such as moving Champ to safety ala Rod Woodson. I don’t know if these are the answers or not but it is all worth looking at. I think a second this year and a fourth next year would be good for Champ when you consider the limited number of years of production he has left. If Jedi and the X-man are sharp drafters we could get some great players in the second and fourth rounds. At this stage in the game I don’t think we can hurt ourselves defensively any more, so anything is worth considering.
The player who thinks he can and the player who knows he can are two different players, which one are you???
Champ at Safety
I’m not sure if the move is needed just yet, but with his tackling ability he would make a good safety. I think probably in the next year or two. That’s where good corners go when they lose a step.
What does Champ want?
I’d be OK with a trade for a good deal, but only if Champ agrees to it. At some point you have to consider factors like team loyalty. What kind of message would it send to the Bronco players if the new regime shuffles him off to a pit like Oakland or Detroit? Champ Bailey is one of the classiest guys in the NFL so, a huge NO to any trade unless Champ is on board with it.
Truly the light is sweet, and a pleasant thing it is for my eyes to behold the sun.
Ecclesiastes
You hit the nail on the head bradley
I couldn’t vote. There are simply too many variables. Does Champ want to leave? Can we get fair compensation for him? What will the cap ramifications be? This is why we have genius X-man to weigh all of the factors. It sure is good of you Guru to get everybody talking though!
It all starts in the trenches HT 11/11/08
Hillis=Cowbell. You can’t have too much. styg 01/29/09
+1 Gazillion for the Guru
Man knows how to raise a right ruckus! Props!!
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 4:03 PM MST up reply actions
Bradley has a good perspective
Rewarding loyalty and excellence builds trust between not only the front office and the players but also with the fans. This is coming from a Cincinatti Reds fan who had to deal with the Marge Schott ownership fiascos.
I agree, Larsen shouldn’t get any bigger. I am getting tired of his bone crushing hits knocking the pixels off my TV, once they fall to the floor they are very hard to find.
by Arctic Bronco on Feb 19, 2009 5:44 AM MST up reply actions
A Couple Thoughts
1) Buy low sell high. Bailey likely wouldn’t command his actual value due to his relatively unproductive, injury-plagued season. Strike one to trading him. That said, I agree you at least discuss it and possibly shop him around. Acquiring information is always a good idea.
2) With Bly gone, we have starts and nickel roles to fill. Malcolm Jenkins is now in play at #12, although I doubt he lasts.
i'm voting no in 09 but yes in 10
ok so his best years are behind him and he’s going into next year with a doubt about his health after picking up his first major injury.
All perfect reasons to keep him.
Every offensive co-ordinator is going to test him to see if stories of his death have been greatly exaggerated and he’ll remind us why he’s worth the money. Its really tough to judge someone who didn’t really have much to do for a couple of years.
All it needs is a slightly better defense. As TSG said, all the best defenses have good linebackers as leaders. So lets get someone who can let champ be champ and be aggressive in pass coverage. No more lining him up over the tight end so he can stop a running play!
Here's the problem...
Let’s assume that the best long term interests of the team are to trade Champ (I don’t necessarily agree with this, but for the sake of argument I’ll play). There is still an unspoken qustion of WHEN to trade him. Two years ago Champ would have been an exptremely hot commodity, but he has had two years in a row where the interceptions have been way down and he just missed half a season to injury. Let’s face it, his trade value is way down. On top of that there are some very good free agents out there this year who could be had by other teams without giving up draft picks. An important question is whether you even can get decent trade value for Champ THIS year.
Even if you do want to trade him, aren’t we better off playing him another year, possibly making Pro Bowl again and generating some picks so that his draft stock rises? It’s not like we need the draft picks this year anyway.
There inlies the problem....
Fans can’t have their cake and eat it too.
Either Champ has value or he doesn’t. If not, then how good is he really? It’s funny. People will debate topics like this as “pie in the sky” because no team will want him anyway, yet say we need to get value.
This is an either/or proposition. If you think Champ has little trade value, I probably don;t want him on my team anyway because he’s no good(safe to say that isn’t the case)
Otherwise, if Champ is so good that “we need to make sure we get fair value”, I am putting him on the market to see what it holds. It’s almost like we under-value AND over-value our players at the same time!
This isn’t directed at you SWG, just responding to the idea in general.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
You can't go wrong with the Law of the Excluded Middle
Nice axiomatic stance guru!
Concision in style, precision in thought, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 18, 2009 11:21 AM MST up reply actions
point of logic solely -- fuzzy logicians disagree with the Law of the excluded middle term
I believe my initial reaction was quite similar — he’s worth more to us than we can get for him.
Champ may not have value in terms of trade value but he can still have value to the team (although I"m not arguing for this point). It’s a mundane problem called “liquidity.” Multi-valent logic doesn’t accept the Law on formal terms either.
Sometimes there just isn’t a market for a player despite his value to a team. Fungibility is assumed, as part of the mathematically idealized world where economists theorize, much like Plato’s ultimate reality of pure forms.
BTW — I’d take that trade for Champ.
Fungibility!
Don’t think I’ve ever seen that used in the context of football!!!!
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 2:09 PM MST up reply actions
and I wasn't the first either (someone else used the term here before me)
We see this idea expressed frequently in a football context, when someone says the “market” value for a player is low, implying that a higher value exists but can’t be found because of the lack of a buyer.
On which all economic transaction are based.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 2:52 PM MST up reply actions
I meant the overvalue/undervalue part...
not the Endowment Effect. Items are only bougth/sold because one party (the buyer) values them more than the other (the seller).
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 2:54 PM MST up reply actions
Jeezus guys
I know Bronco fans are brilliant, but this has elevated into a freakonomics class!!
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 4:05 PM MST up reply actions
So we deserve BOTH a pulitzer and a nobel : )
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 4:08 PM MST up reply actions
fuzzy logic is dependent upon either/or
I don’t know which fuzzy logicians are upset with the term, but best case scenario they are defining a totally separate “excluded middle” term from the one used in western propositional logic, one meant to specifically apply to their discipline, which to my knowledge is limited to engineering and computer science, solely as mathematical terms used to define change without defining infinite states.
Worst case scenario they are crusading against aristotelian logic, which dooms them to productive irrelevance. I would have said historical irrelevance, except that some of the worst destroyers in history were focused on abrogating identity.
As to SWG’s post, he added clarification below which showed he was assuming that we would market Champ if we could rely on perceived value. If I am not mistaken, the upshot of this idea is that it is a value to float champ when there are buyers who aren’t willing or aren’t capable of doing the homework to separate perceived from actual, since the assumption is that the actual value is something which can be perceived, since we know what it is. This is a separate argument, and not without merits.
Concision in style, precision in thought, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 18, 2009 5:24 PM MST up reply actions
But part of that problem...
….is that other teams don’t have the time and film to look at Champ. His last two years have been way off in terms of INT’s, and then the injuries last year. Was it him, or the rest of the D, or the lousy coaching? How many teams will put in the time to decide that Champ is just as good as ever, IF he’s recovered from the groin injury?
Truly the light is sweet, and a pleasant thing it is for my eyes to behold the sun.
Ecclesiastes
Not the choice we're faced with
When you put it that way, it is exactly like under-value and over-value at the same time.
I guess the point is that putting Champ on the market now (and obviously, I’m just speculating here), he would be looked at as a potential HOF’er on the backside of his career with an injury plagued season right behind him. IF there were no other decent corners on the market at all, you could probably get a decent trade for him. This year, it’s doubtful. Not saying they shouldn’t TRY, but realistically, I don’t see it.
On the other hand, the argument for keeping him is NOT just the inverse of what I just wrote. Enter in other factors like, can the Broncos put a stronger front seven in front of him? Can they let him play CB only and not LB at the same time (talking run support here)? Are his injuries going to be a non-factor next year? If these break even slightly toward the positive side for Champ, he could be poised to break BACK out again. Also, factor in the obvious work going on with rebuilding the entire middle of the defense, front to back, and you have to think about if it’s a good idea to add CB to the list. I suppose that one factor that isn’t be addressed here is where will Champ fit in with the new philosophy? He likes to play off the receiver, looking into the backfield, whereas the NE model is bumping, no, mugging the receiver at the line. Will that fly?
Anyway, I know this post is muddled, but the point is that your argument that little trade value = someone sucks doesn’t follow. You absolutely have to factor in the market, that’s what trade value is all about. Look at what Reggie Hayward got from the Jags. Could he get that this year with Peppers, Suggs on the market as well? I doubt it.
I would not be opposed to trying to trade Champ, but I wouldn’t be overly eager to do it either. I don’t think the market for CB is in our favor this year.
aka MN Bronco
Guru, you are assuming...
that perceived value and actual value are the same. I think we would all agree that Clady’s actual value is much higher than his perceived value, especially as refelcted in Pro Bowl voting.
If Champ’s perceived value is significantly greater than his actual then it makes sense to trade him. But, if his perceived value is less (or even equal) to his actual value then it doesn’t make sense. The problem is two fold. First, we don’t know what his perceived value is. So testing the market has some validity. But we also can’t be sure what Champ’s actual value is either. Will he continue to play at the same level and for how long? Will he thrive in the new system or flonder? No one knows for sure. If Champ return to his 2006 form we will regret trading him, especially if our pass defense continues to be porous. On the other hand, if Champ gets injured again we will all be asking why we didn’t trade him. The answer all depends on how good your crystal ball is.
Mine’s been a bit cloudy lately, how’s yours been?
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 2:01 PM MST up reply actions
The question is...
What is that “level” you speak of? 6-8 games? The dude got hurt turning to run with Randy Moss. He needs to be able to do that. Was it a freak injury, sure, but as we have discussed in different posts, injuries like the one Bailey suffered become “easier” to suffer each time due to the scar tissue.
I’m not saying Champ Bailey isn’t or won’t be a great player anymore. I will question whether he can be that for the Broncos in the near future. Not unless we have one hell of a draft and FA season rebuilding that front-7.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
It all comes full circle
Nail, let me introduce to the hammer that is Guru.
Not unless we have one hell of a draft and FA season rebuilding that front-7.
I have taken part in debates over the years about which way to pursue building a defense. Does it start up front? Or do you start at the outside? I think over the past several years, it has been shown for certain in Denver that starting with great corners and building inward does not work. Obviously, Champ’s career speaks for itself and even Bly, though not the best, had a nice career going pre-Denver. Who didn’t argue that the Donks had teh best tandem a couple years ago? Yet, what did it result in? Squat.
If they can’t put together at least a serviceable front 7, then trading Champ would be the best thing for both parties. I like Champ a lot and would love to see him get a ring, obviously with the Broncos, but if not then somewhere. I guess the question is what’s the timetable? 1 year? 2?
aka MN Bronco
OF
Is there a limit to how many picks a team can have? In madden they limit you to 10 which is why I ask
bye bye DRE
robbo
I think KC had eleven picks last year, didn’t they? I play Madden alot also, and I know what you are talking about, but I am not sure if there is a set number a team can have in the NFL.
by kybroncomaniac on Feb 18, 2009 11:10 AM MST up reply actions
I love Champ
But…the Broncos need draft picks. This is a business, ant it isn’t about love, it is about putting yourself in the best position possible to win. I’m a little surprised they didn’t try to trade Bly – maybe they did look into it, who knows – but it wouldn’t hurt to at least see what people are willing to offer for Bailey. If any of the offers are worth it then it is a good idea to consider. If not, then we get to retain one of the best corners in the league and a real team leader.
But the way they’re blowing up the roster, they need picks. Lots of picks.
BOOM GOES THE DYNAMITE!
CB Position…. :-o
Where’d it go? Oh, it’s okay some guy named McDaniels has our back.
It’s alright though. However, if Champ is shopped it can bring some very, VERY intriguing possibilities along with it. I will also caution everyone to be patient IF (big potential IF) it were to happen. Your CBs don’t just improve overnight when you lose both a player of Champ’s caliber and a guy like Bly (albeit a “non-tackler,” but still had his moments). Patience is a virtue and now that a new coach and scheme have entered the fray it looks like Denver may ask it’s fans to be patient once more.
I don’t mind, as long as it brings good things for BOTH Champ and the Broncos organization. Again though, patience. I’m sure the guys in the front office know what they’re doing.
Another thought is
Another thought is that because we have so many changes to our roster comming that we might still need a little consistency. Champ is revered by all corners. If we are looking to get younger, we still need to keep a mentor. I think his valuable knowlege and ability to teach younger corners is irreplacable.
I remember watching Foxworth against the Redskins years ago. He was in coverage. They tried to throw against Foxworth, and Fox got a pass interference call. Bailey pulled him aside, and the next play the Redskins tried it again. The result… Foxworth intercepted the ball. He ran the route facing the QB.
Clearly it was Champs tutoring that helped Foxworth out. I believe we could not get adequate compensation for what we would be loosing when it comes to champ. There are too many immesurables.
Just my opinion.
by kybroncomaniac on Feb 18, 2009 11:07 AM MST reply actions
This is my thought too
we need at least one DB with a coach’s “eye” for the game,a dn Champ is one of the best.
This doesn’t preclude shopping him, it just puts some contingencies on the rest of free agency. Frankly I would rather have a safety with that kind of skill, because they see more of the play, so maybe a Brian Dawkins type of pickup would be pursued as a contingency for accepting an offer for Champ.
One other contingency would be that it must include a first day pick for 09, but that is probably standard issue.
Concision in style, precision in thought, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 18, 2009 11:27 AM MST up reply actions
I meant to add
that filmwork for DBs is very important, and another area where a veteran DB can help is in showing the younger guys how to break down film. Dawkins came to mind specifically because he is a film demon.
Concision in style, precision in thought, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 18, 2009 11:28 AM MST up reply actions
Absolutely!
I would love to see Dawkins here! How many levels would that serve us!
by kybroncomaniac on Feb 18, 2009 12:14 PM MST up reply actions
I also like Dawkins.
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
Remember the poll you helped me out with about Dawkins . once again thank you for that !
I went to the eagles blog site bleeding green nation to ask about him .
The people there said that there Quote ’’ will be a F…ing riot if they let him go to another team.
someone else said that they would flip cars over and burn stuff .
The fans here do not want to see him go at all
by broncosfaninphilly on Feb 18, 2009 5:19 PM MST up reply actions
classic Philly. lol
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
Dawkins is the man...they have to keep him
It shows how much he means to the franchise….I hope we get him
"I am not trying to start anything I am just saying that i think if you take Knowshon and draft D later you guys will be hella good next year" ...IamtheGreatest - The smartest Chiefs fan I ever had the priviledge of reading!
If the right options come along then I think McD and Mr. X will look into it.
I love the how Champ pretty much shuts down one half of the field, however if the CB on the other side isn’t doing his job or there is no pass rush, something we don’t know how to do, then Champ’s presence isn’t a big factor. I like Champ and hope he stays because even though not a lot of passes come his way, he is awesome in stopping the run. always say, “whatever makes the Broncos a better more solid team I am all for.”
the defense was never the same after Al Wilson got hurt, with or without Champ.
You are so right Guru. Also, as you said on MHR Radio we seemed to play more fundamental football at times when Champ was out this past season. Interesting food for thought.
"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan
Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 9
Also
So far we have released, what, 11players? with another 3 or four FA not going to be resigned? That makes 14 – 15 holes on the 53 man roster, not to mention the 80 or so people you want in training camp.
We are already in the hole because we have 9 picks in the draft. Of course there will always be college UFAs. leaving four or more FAs to be signed (mathmatically speaking).
Why would we decide to cut further into the skelatal structure of the defense? We still need something to build off of, don’t we? Champ, either at corner or saftey, fills a need. We might be trimming too thin if we try to move Champ. He is very valuable to us. Even in his deminished play (yes, I noted that it was not only Dre Bly that gave up a long touchdown bomb to Brett Farve that game) he is still better than many corners on many teams. Even If you move him to saftey, we can surely use him there, he would certainly be helpful as many QB’s would hesitate to throw that deep ball because Champ would already be back awaiting it. It would take away the deep threat from every team. I am certain that unless there is a great offer from a team, that Champ needs to stay right here.
He adds versatility. If we can get a good corner, use Champ at saftey, ONLY if the corner is better than Champ. If we can get a good saftey in FA, then keep Champ at corner, it opens up the possibilities a little.
by kybroncomaniac on Feb 18, 2009 11:30 AM MST reply actions
Guru makes an interesting point
when mentioning the backlash of an already shocked fanbase. Readers of MHR are, on average, more informed fans who are in tune with the Broncos much moreso than our “weekend warrior” bretheren, who contitute the vast majority of the orange and blue fan base.
That said, it should be realized that those fans cling to Champ as a pillar of this team. I think Champs earned admiration of this fan base, could very well buy him a few years here. I voted yes, but I’m not sure that “McXanders” and Bowlen are prepared to cause this type of trauma to the already shook up Bronco faithful.
by ThunderBringer on Feb 18, 2009 11:38 AM MST reply actions
Here's the real question?
what teams would want Champ? or, what teams are a “Champ” away from winning it all?
AFC
NE – can’t see them making a trade, esp now that McD is here
Indy – don’t see that happening
Pitt – doesn’t fit their biz model approach to FA
SD – don’t need
Tenn – maybe? but at what cost? Haynsworth will cost big bucks this year
Houston – does Kubes go after him? don’t know…
Bills – interesting….small market could benefit from Champ, but Im not sure their secondary is that bad…
Miami – can’t see Parcells pulling the trigger
NFC
Cowgirls – possibility just because of Jerry
Skins – HAHA…
TB – maybe…?
Saints – maybe?
anyway, you see where im going with this… who are the potential suitors?
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Feb 18, 2009 12:15 PM MST reply actions 1 recs
Won't happen and here is why:
a) Obviously when a team is rebuilding you explore all options, but as many of you have pointed out Champ’s perceived trade value is well below his value to the team. Should the Broncos be open to exploring those trade possibilities? Absolutely, but it wont happen.
b) McD recently said that they are looking for “Smart, tough players”, Champ is both of those. Champ is smart enough, and talented enough that you build your defense around his skills, not try and plug his skills into what you think your defense should be. The Patriots have always done that on both sides of the ball, find the best players, according to their criteria, then find the best way to use them. Look at the 2 best defenses in the league, the Stealers and Ravens, they have intelligent, athletic, tough, motivated players lining up all over the field. Champ stays. The challenge is on Mike Nolan to maximize his skills on Defense.
c) If Champ lines up on special teams again next season I predict a losing season for the Broncos because the change in coaching staff has failed and Mike Nolan should go sell cars or something.
I mostly agree with you....though I think Guru's premise was that the Broncos needs to explore ALL options
including trading Champ. My guess is that it won’t happen…but that doesn’t mean we can’t discuss the topic or give the idea validity. I think trading Champ has its good points and bad ones…either way I think we’ve gotten rid of enough starters on defense…let’s start rebuilding it already!
PS I am including the defensive starters going to Free Agency in the lost category. ;-)
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
C jumped out at me
Champ playing ST increases the chance of injury exponentially. Of course being one of the best tacklers on the team, he was the “safety” on ST. Not this year, no way!
by BroncoConvert on Feb 18, 2009 10:05 PM MST up reply actions
I think NE would not give a second thought to McD being a show stopper if they wanted Champ. They have a history of going after older vets.
SD had a very poor defense, any addition would improve their D, and Champ would improve it,
Miami sold out for Ricky Williams, and Champ would certainly improve what they are doing there.
KC might be up for a trade. They had 11 picks last year in the draft, and need talent NOW!
The Raiders would want him to form a dangerous CB tandem.
The saint love FAs, and are looking at the now instead of the future, I think they would make a move. Especially dealing with Carolina and Tampa Bay like they do.
None of these are facts, but certainly possibilities.
That being said, I do not want to see Champ moved at all. He belongs in Denver, in my opinion.
by kybroncomaniac on Feb 18, 2009 12:30 PM MST reply actions
Some thoughts
New England may be the most logical choice, no way we trade him in division so SD, KC, and Oakland are out of the mix, Miami I don’t think wants a older vet that may be on the tail end of his career, Parcells I think may like Champ, but he generally prefers younger guys or vets that are “his guys”, and so I don’t see that as a high possibility.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
Check your assumptions
NE doesn’t trade for high price veterans; they typically look for undervalued players like Moss (4th round pick)
SD already has cap problems and has Cromoartie and Cason
Miami has their own FAs to worry about
KC is moving toward youth and Pioli’s business model probably hasn’t changed just cause he’s not with NE anymore.
If the Raiders want to pay for a high priced CB they can just sign Asomugha, but they don’t have cap room.
Saints love FAs but they have cap problems already.
Carolina has good CBs already
Champ doesn’t fit well in a Tampa 2.
Houston can just sign Robinson if they want a top CB; he’s younger and cheeper.
Bills have a FA CB of their own. Why not re-sign the younger player you already have rather than trading for someone elses veteran.
I think it’s worth inquiring, but I don’t see many teams who would be willing to trade.
If they want an older veteran McAllister is available; Bal cut him; no draft picks required.
If you want to pay Asomugha or Robinson are both available and 8 years younger.
I just don’t see anyone giving up what Champ is worth, at least not this year.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 1:46 PM MST up reply actions
You are probably right
I guess I was just saying that ruling out teams that would want Champ is like predicting the draft:)
I know many people say that we wouldn’t send someone to a divisional team, but we have sent players (Romo, warren) to the Raiders.
I do not know what other coaches would think when considering Champ. I just wouldn’t rule out these teams. SWG, you seem to be pretty up on other teams salary cap numbers, so you probably have a better grip on what can and can’t be afforded.
by kybroncomaniac on Feb 18, 2009 2:39 PM MST up reply actions
We didn't SEND Romo or Warren to the Raiders....
We released them. Big Al signed them because he thought (rightly) that they still had some mileage left.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 3:59 PM MST up reply actions
I though we released and got a comp pick...
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 4:33 PM MST up reply actions
My bad...
Warren was traded. Ouch, why did we do that?
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 4:38 PM MST up reply actions
He couldn't play two-gap
Then we jettisoned the two-gap.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
DOOM
No, not Elvis, Shanny’s. In my mind, the Bates experiment was what did him in. Losing a productive and content Gerard Warren because he couldn’t play that scheme, blowing a pick for Jimmy Kennedy only to see him jettisoned before he could unpack his bags, etc. etc. That killed him.
aka MN Bronco
Warren traded
We used the pick for Spencer Larsen
Truly the light is sweet, and a pleasant thing it is for my eyes to behold the sun.
Ecclesiastes
Back when you first suggested it, Guru,
I could see the logic in it, and I was not vehemently against it. However, now that Bly has been shown the door, and with the safety position still in need, moving Champ would severely deplete the secondary. I really don’t think they have any intention of sending him anywhere, else they would have kept Bly. At least, that is my impression, but I have been wrong a lot lately, so who knows?
Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy
AZDynamite
Do not worry bud, we have all been wrong alot lately. LOL. Seat belts on my friend, we are in for onehellofaride!
by kybroncomaniac on Feb 18, 2009 12:33 PM MST up reply actions
i voted yes because of the wording..."investigate trading"
im watching the bills game right now and holy crap jc is awesome….cant wait til he does’nt have to score every time just to keep it close…..i just gave my opinion on this champ thing yesterday and i guessed we could get a late third for him.and if he’ll restructure and has 2 or 3 years left a third is not worth giving him away. this is all contingent on him not being stubborn with his contract and wanting to be part of this mini rebuild. if he wants out fine, send him to nfc soth for the best pick we can get in Next Years draft(better value). i would like to see him make a run with us in 2010 and 2011 and rock orange in canton in 2016
"show me a good loser and i'll show you a loser" - coach
Why do we love the Broncos?
I know the NFL is a business. Sometimes business has to be tough. Sometimes you’ve got to make ruthless decisions to improve the end product. That’s what businesses do.
But, frankly, I don’t have one dollar invested in the Broncos. I’ve invested my heart in them. And it’s no short term investment either. I’ve invested my heart in them ever since I was a little boy. Now I’m close to what many would call an old man and I still give them my heart. I will continue to do so until my heart gives out. It’s not a business to me. It’s family. I love these guys almost like they are a part of my family. You don’t trade your brother because you can get a better one, at a discount, from some other city. You don’t throw away Gramma because her up-keep is getting a little steep for the return you get back from her.
Champ has played his heart out for us, given us a lot of the best he has to offer. How can we do anything less for him?
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
I voted yes, but I don't think there would be a trade worth it
I know Champ is getting beyond his prime, but the fact is he still is one of the best in the league when healthy and I think he has the smarts to play well for another five years even though he may be losing some of his physical skills. I have seen the thoughts of trading him for a 1st rounder, but that won’t happen, no team will give up a 1st rounder for him because of his salary and injury history, I much rather have him here to provide some guidence to other young CB as a mentor, and to also help Cutler and Co. understand how to beat a top CB, he has more value than just what he does on Sundays.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
51 to 48 says you're pretty persuasive and the situation has changed
Like several others I voted yes not because I want a trade or think a 2nd and 4th is worth it but because the choices offered are basically 1) let’s keep an open mind, and 2) hell no! When you put it that way [ :) ] number one is logical, but it’s a testament to Champ’s popularity that so many still voted number two.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
I voted "No--that is crazy"
because it’s closer to “I don’t think so” than “Yes” is even with the caveat that we’d just be testing the market. I just don’t think we’re going to get value for Champ equal to what he’s worth to us on the field, and I while it might make perfect business sense to test the market, this might be one of those times to remember that these are people we’re dealing with, not baseball cards. I like the idea of Jedi going to Champ and saying, “I’m not putting you on the market, because I BELIEVE that you can still be the best CB in the league. I want you lead the defense I’m putting together, just by setting an example on the field. We are going to turn this thing around quicker than everyone thinks, and you’re the piece I’m building around. You’re going back to the Pro Bowl next year, and we’re going to the playoffs.”
MS: "I'm sorry Jake. I've decided to go another direction."
JP: "But...."
by Plummer's But on Feb 18, 2009 2:28 PM MST up reply actions
Good Grief
are you the one and only Letplummerplay?
It all starts in the trenches HT 11/11/08
Hillis=Cowbell. You can’t have too much. styg 01/29/09
No...
in fact, I couldn’t have disagreed with him more….
come to think of it, I haven’t seen LPP around these parts in a long while…
MS: "I'm sorry Jake. I've decided to go another direction."
JP: "But...."
by Plummer's But on Feb 18, 2009 4:44 PM MST up reply actions
If Plummer's But looked anything like the Butt in your avatar I would have become LPP myself!
Then again I wasn’t married back then….and the behind in your avatar is not a male behind. :)
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
Great observation!!
the behind in your avatar is not a male behind
It all starts in the trenches HT 11/11/08
Hillis=Cowbell. You can’t have too much. styg 01/29/09
Yeah...lol I felt I needed to make sure you all know that. :)
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
I'm going to disagree
On your point about the drafts:
If you don’t think ‘06 draft was a raving success (Cutler, Scheffler, Marshall, Kuper, Dumervil, Hixon) you are crazy. The 2007 draft we had four picks. We got two good starters IMO (Thomas and Harris), and two that are yet to be determined (Moss, Crowder). They’ve both been called busts, but everyone also seems pretty excited about what they can do in “Holy Grail Defense”. At any rate, half of the picks starters and the other half still on the team is pretty decent for a draft. 2005 wasn’t any worse: Darrent Williams (you can’t claim that’s a bad pick, it’s not our fault he’s not still starting), Paymah, Foxworth, Clarett (yes bad pick here), Chris Myers, and Paul Ernster (can’t fault drafting a punter in the last round when you need it).
For contrast/comparison, the Patriots 2007: Merriwether (good pick), Kareem Brown (NYJ, no career games), Clint Oldenburg (guess where he is now: Broncos), Justin Rodgers (Dallas STs), Mike Richardson (5th CB), Justise Hairston (no idea), and Corey Hilliard (no idea). That’s a good safety and a big list of “who?”. 2006: Laurence Maroney (good but not first round good), Chad Jackson (guess where), David Thomas (TE with 21 Rec, 261 yards, 1 TD last 3 years), Garret Mills (no games for NE, plays for Minn now), Gotskowski (4th round, good kicker, maybe overpaid?), Ryan O’Callahaghn (T on their roster, can’t see him on the depth chart), Jeremy Mincey (didn’t play for NE, minimal play for JAX), Dan Stevenson (don’t know), Le Kevin Smith (is on roster), Willie Andrews (no idea). Last two years, 3 starters (I’m even including Maroney in this count) and 3 other players still on roster.
Jason
The Hanging Curve
Give Moss more time....please. :)
Crowder’s potential about equals what we have in Ebenezer Ekuban…I say we keep EE and dump Crowder. Rather have the most now rather than wait for 5 years for it to come about. lol
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
I'll give you '06 and '08.
Not ‘07, and ’06 is a complete bust. But again, we are of completely separate mindsets. I am not going to say 06 was a great draft if Karl Paymah and Domonique Foxworth go on to have Hall of Fame careers somewhere else. Just like they wouldn’t be remembered as Denver Broncos.
Teams that are winning Super Bowls, or at least contending, do so because of the draft. The Pats, like the Chargers, Steelers, and others, succeed in the draft. You get to a point, however, when you just don;t have space on a roster for a guy. The Pats went through that a couple years ago, the Chargers that past 2 years. Hell, A.J. Smith said as much after he traded half his draft away in ’07.
I am looking at the 03 and 04 drafts specifically, because these guys wouold be entering their prime right now. Who is still on the roster from those drafts?
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
If players we draft become great elsewhere
that doesn’t reflect badly on our drafting but on player evaluation and retention, with salary cap management and management/player relations playing an important role. With two starters (who might turn out to be well above average) and two question marks ‘06 is a decent draft that could get better. Also, when evaluating drafts I think we need to separate the concepts of “drafting well” and “having a good draft”. If you have 11 picks of whom 5 are first and second round you’ll probably have a pretty good draft, in the sense of picking up several future starters and maybe even a star, even if you don’t do a particularly good job of picking players. Conversely, if you have only one pick, a seventh rounder, it’s not going to have been a strong draft even if you grab a sleeper who gives you years of solid play.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
With fingers in my ears...
“La, la, la, la, la, la….. I am not listening, I am not listening.”
It’s just too painful, Guru.
aka MN Bronco
No, no, no, no, no.....
I’m only doing it for a first rounder… I wouldn’t necessarily do this but we could possible swap Peppers and Bailey if Peppers is Franchised
Yes, I'm a Diamondback and Suns fan. So you may be wondering, "Why does this fool like the Broncos so much?"
A: The Cardinals are too hard of a pill to swallow. Oh yeah and that Elway dude....
Wow
313 to 309 votes. I voted, like the (slim) majority, for dangling him.
And yes i would take the 2009-2nd and 2010-4th. No use for corners, when you haven’t got pass-rush.
Random quotes about the raiders:
They really shouldn’t play — Chris Collinsworth (12/5/08)
This is an utter disaster — Chris Collinsworth (12/5/08)
/The great Dane - formerly known as Claaaaas!
by Claus Vestergaard on Feb 18, 2009 3:13 PM MST reply actions
+1
No use for corners, when you haven’t got pass-rush.
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
I voted no
because I just got a 24 jersey for Christmas…and I don’t think a 2nd and a 4th is worth it for us. Between the draft picks we have and the FA’s out there Champ is way more valuable than those picks, especially considering we don’t really have to add too much on offense.
Have a good time all the time...that's my motto. - Viv Savage
lol! Classic.
Watch…the next #24 will turn out to be the next draft bust.
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
or the next dope smoking FA
But hey, we have X now! I’ve have no more talk of draft busts!! ; )
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 4:30 PM MST up reply actions
only Xtasy
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
Xtasy? who invited Janikowsi?
lol
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 4:45 PM MST up reply actions
I voted no.......
….because one big factor last season that has been understated was the loss of Lynch as a leader more than anything; someone who can set expectation, tempo and intensity on ‘D’ and inspire those around him to do better. I think Champ can step up and be that sort of a player for us. We will definitely need those qualities with so many personnel changes, not to mention a new scheme. I don’t think we could pick up anyone on FA who could/can do the things he did /does. Give him another year where he’s hopefully injury-free and see how he goes.
by atwater-crunch! on Feb 18, 2009 3:32 PM MST reply actions
Keep Champ
At least one more year. Improve the D around him; better pass rush, maybe he won’t have to play so much run support.
"Be not like dumb-driven cattle...."
would you take late third ?
"show me a good loser and i'll show you a loser" - coach
timing
My thinking hasn’t changed since this question was first posted but the context has. Leaving Bailey in place made sense then largely because his “trade value” was less than what he brought to the team. The difference between then and now is timing, and I don’t mean that has trade value has improved. Bailey’s age is now a much greater factor since the rebuilding effort is going to outlast his ability to provide a meaningful contribution to the team.
The team and Bailey are different calendars. Moreover, as we’ve seen lately, even when he’s playing at top form he can’t compensate for weaknesses elsewhere on the defense — teams merely search out a weakness elsewhere. It’s a sort of “weakest link” logic. No matter how strong Bailey is (the strong link) he can’t make the defensive unit strong enough overall because of weak links elsewhere, thus his strength is wasted.
Finding a reasonable value is still a problem, and I wouldn’t want to give Bailey away at a sub-bargain price as Oakland did with Moss even if buyers are hard to find. On a team with a stronger supporting cast he could still prove to be the difference in winning a championship — THINK NEW ENGLAND!!
Guru’s asking price is highly appropriate, and for both sides. I also think it would expedite a trade if Bailey agreed to re-work his contract to make it cap friendly and gave his blessing to a number of trade destinations that are on the brink of a championship. Others here would know those better than I, although a few teams come to mind.
Bailey vs. Moss
This is a great comparison. I would hate to see Bailey sent packing for chump change for the sake of “rebuilding” only to have him revert back to his old form for another team. To me, his struggles were less about deteriorating skills and more about having to take his first step TOWARD the line of scrimmage in run support.
aka MN Bronco
You make a good case,
but I think the other alternative is to see if his trade value improves with a better system. Teams are always going to seek the weak link and that hasn’t been Champ in the past. But I suspect a number of teams will try to test him next year, creating the opportunity for more picks. More picks increases his trade value and a full season removes much of the “injury” risk for other teams.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 4:03 PM MST up reply actions
an idea
Everyone can critique me, but —
Bailey to NE for Cassel, who goes to SF for a #2 and #3.
I think Belichick realizes that Bailey still has something in the tank and would know what value a smart, talented player such as Bailey brings to NE, which needs CBs. SF, from what little I know, needs a QB and a #2 and #3 is commensurate for Cassel at this point. There’s also salary issues for NE, now that they’re paying so much to their QBs.
Not a bad thought to me though Cassell is a better fit at KC...
He has talent around him in that offense and if Cassell was in the draft he would be the first QB taken so why not trade the 3rd overall pick for him? NE could then trade down and load up on all the young outside LB available later in round 1 and earlier in round 2.
But your idea is possible and makes sense.
"I am not trying to start anything I am just saying that i think if you take Knowshon and draft D later you guys will be hella good next year" ...IamtheGreatest - The smartest Chiefs fan I ever had the priviledge of reading!
Not NE's style....
I just don’t see NE paying for Champ. Now if we cut him they would snatch him up in a minute like they did Harrison. If NE wanted to pay for a premier CB why didn’t they just keep Samuel?
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 4:41 PM MST up reply actions
that's why a re-worked contract is requisite
I can’t say how their salary cap looks but a re-worked contract would fit.
I’m surprised they didn’t keep Samuel, but that could have been a mistake. It’s clear that they haven’t been able to re-stock at CB as they expected (this was on NFL.com). The point is to view it from their point of view at the time rather than how it worked out (a hindsight bias).
The added element since then, besides the failure of their CBs to develop, is the emergence of Cassel, who gives them a ‘new’ value to trade and a considerable financial obligation. Would you want to trade a 2nd string QB a franchise salary? And would you see fixing a problem on defense that could deliver you a championship as worth the cost? Remember, they’ve got to pay Cassel, too, so it’s basically an even proposition salary-wise.
I understand what you are saying...
and taken in isolation it makes sense, but in the larger context I don’t think it fits. If NE is thinking that way, why wouldn’t trade Cassel to SF themselves, sign McAllister (who fits their system better in my view) and pocket the draft picks themselves. If I’m Belichick that seems like a much better plan.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 6:36 PM MST up reply actions
I think Samuel makes more than Champ...
And don’t forget, the Pats traded a 2nd Round pick for, at the time, a Special Teams player….Wes Welker. That turned out ok. When they want something, they go and get it.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
Last I checked....
when salary bonuses, etc are counted Champ is the highest paid CB, but it can be hard to do straight comparisons because everyone’s contract is structured differently. I think Champ, Nnamdi, and Samuel are the three highest.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Feb 18, 2009 11:02 PM MST up reply actions
what about nate clemens
in San Fran?
Concision in style, precision in thought, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 18, 2009 11:14 PM MST up reply actions
Colinski, you make a strong point
But I still feel that the hole left in the Depth Chart with both Bly and Bailey removed, Paymah is a Free Agen….so that leaves us with Jack Williams and Josh Bell as the only holdovers? That is a scary thought to me. Champ need to stay. He is a fine enough athlete to still contribute for 4 more years. He is a mature example of a Hall of Fame player and the type of guy who adds a presence in the locker room.
"I am not trying to start anything I am just saying that i think if you take Knowshon and draft D later you guys will be hella good next year" ...IamtheGreatest - The smartest Chiefs fan I ever had the priviledge of reading!
the roster numbers are scary
We may not receive any reasonable offers so keeping him could be unavoidable. I’m not down on Bailey, even though his recent spate of injuries leaves me leery, but I think the frequently espoused “presence in the locker room” theory needs examination. There’s clearly bad influences but I don’t think the “good influences” can remedy poor on-the-field team performance.
Keeping Bailey is more of a luxury given the fact that we can’t surround him with enough talent in the immediate future, so the “positive influence” justification is overly sentimental. I think the best way of developing a nucleus is to bring in group of players and allow them to develop together over a period of time.
We’d probably bring in one veteran corner and use a higher pick on one now if we traded Bailey. And, of course, we have JW and Bell. There’s a lot of good CBs in this draft, and giving them time to develop together with the rest of the defense would help them greatly. I think the main argument — however — is the teambuilding concept of converting players back into value while you can, and continuously building a team by adding to each position. Sadly, the CB project of the early zeros failed, so we’re due for an infusion there.
Yes an infusion is likely
When I talk about presence I mean more on the lines of the younger guys realizing that they are playing and practicing and working with one the best pure cover men in the history of football. Champ doesn’t need to be a rah rah type just due to the respect he commands. I think that makes guys keep quiet and try to learn and not try to be the “man” because Champ trumps that idea.
As always Colinski….nice talking with you.
"I am not trying to start anything I am just saying that i think if you take Knowshon and draft D later you guys will be hella good next year" ...IamtheGreatest - The smartest Chiefs fan I ever had the priviledge of reading!
That is why I am a big fan of Champ
He doesn’t talk a lot and the fact that he acts humble sometimes is the reason he is a good leader. He leads by example. You don’t always have to be a “vocal” leader.
"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan
Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 9
I agree, but a defense needs a vocal leader as well as the quite leaders.
Seriously…Nate Webster was our vocal leader last year. WTF?!
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
How much vocal leadership is needed on the field?
If professional athletes need a cheerleader with big muscles to get them to play better they should be cut. I think the vocal leaders are easy for the fans to identify with because getting excited and making lots of noise during games is our best (and only) way to contribute to the game.
Basically, I expect athletes who are paid good money to be able to internalize the actions and attitudes needed to survive and be successful throughout each game. I will make exceptions for 1st and 2nd year players, but if there is too much emphasis put on the need for “Ray Lewisish” leadership then all I see is a search for excuses to justify lack of individual intensity. Football is the ultimate team sport, but each play is broken down into individuals battling against each other, each individual has to have the inner strength to excel, with or without a vocal leader on the field.
I agree, Larsen shouldn’t get any bigger. I am getting tired of his bone crushing hits knocking the pixels off my TV, once they fall to the floor they are very hard to find.
by Arctic Bronco on Feb 19, 2009 6:21 AM MST up reply actions
Your argument is basically of the nature
that “this is the way things ought to be,” but things aren’t necessarily the way we think they ought to be. I’d guess most coaches think leaderships matters and makes a difference. Players are human beings, and some players have a knack for being able to “fire up” their teammates at critical junctures. But it could be added that it’s not only and always vocal leadership that changes the emotional intensity of a team and thus the “momentum”. A “game-changing play” can do it, because so often what makes it game-changing isn’t solely what the play accomplishes but the fire with which the team plays in its aftermath. Hence, guys who have a knack for making big plays at critical moments have an impact on the intensity with which their teammates play. Often a player is a leader in both of the above senses.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
I agree...
And I think that there’s a reasonable chance that Champ will still be performing at a high level when the Broncos are back in the Super Bowl picture. (a Darrell Green denouement, anyone?) Of course that does assume that the recent injuries are an anomaly and not a trend. Could be wrong about that. But I think Champ will bounce back and have a good year this year.
MS: "I'm sorry Jake. I've decided to go another direction."
JP: "But...."
by Plummer's But on Feb 18, 2009 4:49 PM MST up reply actions
Youre acting like Champ is done
The Raiders thought the same thing about Charles Woodson. He was hurt in Oakland the last couple of years, the raiders thought he was done, let him walk and he goes to Green Bay and he is still top 10 if not top 5 corner in the league. Lets not make the same mistake the Raiders did.
Why cant we just think about keeping champ !
Why explore trades that probably are not going to happen . Why cant we just let the guy
heal up from his injurys. And wait for him to return to the strength speed and form that
he once had . He will be whole again and dominating ! be patient.
I am going on the record as one of the people that wanted to stick with champ
all the way no matter what . So when the turnaround happens everyone
will know where i stood .
by broncosfaninphilly on Feb 18, 2009 4:04 PM MST reply actions
Yup
We’re all gonna be the first ones against the wall when the revolution starts! LOL
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 4:09 PM MST up reply actions
Well, I guess I'm in this group too.
Let me put this another way. How can we ask that our players show character when we are not willing to do the same for them? We should treat Champ Bailey like we treeated Rod Smith and John Elway. He has earned the right to decide how he leaves the Broncos.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on Feb 18, 2009 5:33 PM MST up reply actions
Absolutely agree!
"I am not trying to start anything I am just saying that i think if you take Knowshon and draft D later you guys will be hella good next year" ...IamtheGreatest - The smartest Chiefs fan I ever had the priviledge of reading!
Stray thought
I’m sure that if McD is pondering this, he is weighing it carefully.
Cuz I bet he won’t soon forget that near endzone-to-endzone, almost-pick-six Champ handed NE a few mere years ago. That’s gotta be damn near indelible in the minds of anyone on the Patriots’ staff that year.
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
You guys are all crazy
We absolutely can NOT trade Champ Bailey. First of all he is the still the best conerback in the league. He would have made his 9th straight pro-bowl, had not been injured. He is the face of our defense and he still has 5 solid years left in the NFL. His contract is not lucrative and we absolutely can not have two young corner backs starting for us, we will be crushed by teams for the next 5 years with good passing attacks. It takes minimum 2 3 years to develop a good CB, excluding Antonio Cromartie-Rogers and few others throughout the years. Champ shuts down 1 side of the field and will continue too for the Broncos for the next two years. Champ is the man, if we trade him, I will not watch the Broncos next season because our defense will be even more miserable than this year. Champ is the man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I notice the vote is getting awfully close
Does that mean it’ll trigger an automatic recount?
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
What if Champ wins the popular vote but loses the electoral vote?
And who decides a tie??
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 4:43 PM MST up reply actions
Xanders and McD either agree or nothing happens.
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
And THAT'S the electoral vote
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
hindsight....
if your trading up for cutler your reloading, smith ,nalen,lyynch, al, ect..were’nt going to be around so moving champ after a defensive mvp year would have garnered a first.With scheme generated pressure (at least attempted) champs skills would utilize so nolan needs to shed his passive rep and bring the heat.
"show me a good loser and i'll show you a loser" - coach
I am SO ready for that heat, brother
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 5:03 PM MST up reply actions
Sorry another off topic subject but???
What happened to the BY THE NUMBERS segment
A number for each bronco each day up to #99 ???
by broncosfaninphilly on Feb 18, 2009 5:27 PM MST reply actions
Guru got busy. lol
new coach…now new GM. Bronco players dropping like flies….hard enough to keep up with the present. The By the Numbers series will be posted during “slow news times”….bombs dropping all over the place in Dove Valley presently. They’ll pop up every now and then I am sure…. lol
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
Wasn't that number for each Bronco each day up to #99 quote from
99 days before opening day last year? Then Lynch got canned, we had Niko and Webster fighting for the starting position… You’ll likely see a lot of those by the numbers posts going up in the lull between draft day and training camp.
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
Wow, 167 comments and counting!
You hit the mother lode here, Guru. You ought to get double-recs for this. :)
Still, if I were part of the negotiations on players, they would meet a stone wall in me when it comes to Champ . . .
Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy
With an issue being evenly split at 51-49, the debate is going to be very lively. lol
Especially when concerning the best defensive player on our team and a future hall of famer. Part of me wants to keep Bailey around at least 4 more years so there is no disputing he will retire a Bronco. lol One more hall of famer to add to our 1.5 hall of famers already in. :) I want Bailey to be worth .75 for us, so we’ll have 2.25 Broncos in the hof. Or something like that. :)
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
Well . . .
as I posted earlier, I think it is more than what Champ can bring, as opposed to what he can offer, and the cost thereof. In Bly, the Broncos jettisoned a player who, while not a “bum,” was not worth what they were paying. So I understand that. However, the CB position is now depleted. I don’t see a starter among Paymah, Fox, or Williams. So they have to go after another starter. Unload Champ, and now there are no starters in that position. I just don’t like that idea.
Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy
I am not big on it either. I was more for it when we had Dre Bly...now I think we should keep Champ
as he is a tremendous talent that we need on the defense while we transition.
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
by Tim Lynch on Feb 18, 2009 6:00 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I wonder if they talked to Bly
about restructuring and/or taking a pay cut and didn’t get the answer they wanted?
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
Plus it kinda seems we have pulled a lot of peeps out of the woodwork
since Guru asked us all to shout out our hometowns! Clearly, this Bronco fan thing is infectious!
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 5:57 PM MST up reply actions
Bronco fan thing is infectious..........Yes it is and I love it.
"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan
Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 9
Nobody would say no to trading Champ...
if the deal was good enough. The real difference is WHAT we’d be willing to trade him for. I would hesitate to take just a first round pick for him- after all, we’d have to SPEND a pick on a CB is we traded him. And frankly, with Namdi, Ryans, and some of the other CB’s on the FA market, we wouldn’t get that much for Champ… especially coming off a down season.
NO MHR RADIO TONIGHT
JohnnyB is traveling to Indy for the Combine….how freakin’ cool is that? Live updates from the Combine itself….SA-WEET!
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
that is cool ! too bad they dont hold it in a warm climate city .
by broncosfaninphilly on Feb 18, 2009 6:12 PM MST up reply actions
at least its a dome. lol
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
That is freakin sweet.
We here at MHR are totally spoiled. Now we don’t have to do too much research as to who the top guys are. Hey Zappa, is he there to watch like a fan (if fans are allowed in) or did he somehow get a press pass? Either way it will be good to know someone who will be getting a first-hand look at the players.
"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan
Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 9
So what, they don't have the INTERNET in Indianapolis??? At this rate, he's gonna be in McD's doghouse before camp starts!
LOL Just KIDDING, Guru! That is extremely cool that you’ll be getting us the inside skinny on the livestock convention! Give a kind hello to the MSM for all us MHRers! ; )
Win or lose, do it fairly. -- Knute Rockne
by broncosmontana on Feb 18, 2009 7:56 PM MST up reply actions
Sorry Guys
I did receive a media credential, but things just didn;t work out the way I needed them to. That said, they don;t let the media watch the workouts. You basically sit in a room and they bring different guys in and out to talk to.
For all of you dads out there, I know you get where I am coming from, plus it is the better half’s birthday this weekend. I had her full blessing to go, but I just couldn’t bring myself to leave her with 2 kids for 3 days. I am definitely going to the Draft in April, and to Training Camp in July, but the Combine just wasn;t in the cards for me this year.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
Totally understandable G
I have two kids and a wife myself, and you gotta know when to say when! You made the right move.
"You can't make the club if you're in the tub." -- Rod Smith
by broncosmontana on Feb 19, 2009 12:18 AM MST up reply actions
Don't want to say anything corny
just . . . good for you.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
No worries Guru, you made the right call.
Family does come first especially with your better half’s birthday. You just can’t miss that.
That is very interesting that the media doesn’t get to watch the workouts. Is anyone allowed to like fans?
"It doesn't dissipate" ~ Mike Shanahan
Cutler's 4th qtr/OT game winning drives: 9
Bailey
it is a question I have thought about a lot lately. My only concern is who do we bring in to replace him/ who do we have to replace him? Getting something from trading him is one thing but who is going to virtually shut down half of the field the way champ does? I voted for float him out there but I still say there is a lot to consider before pulling the trade trigger
"It seems like McDaniels is pouring the Orange and Blue Kool-Aid out of the cooler and starting with a fresh batch of purified water." -Harvey J. Neptune
"We should have kept Seattle and dumped San Diego from the Division"
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
Why not shop him...
After all, a lock down corner is not the team. The Denver D sucked with or without him. There are good corners who can do the job and do it better with a well rounded defense.
It is better to keep silent, and appear to be wise, then to ramble on and remove all doubt! The Wisest Man, Solomon.
MHR is the best
Thank you to all contributors to this site. I really appreciate the great posts and comments. I was getting so tired of the mumbo-jumbo from other sites where you would have one good post followed by a bunch of nonsense and name calling.
Keep Champ! Shop D.J.!
Okay maybe don’t shop DJ… I’m just saying, wait and see what happens in free agency and that draft.
I can’t speak for anyone else, but, I except that the broncos are going to be much improved on the front 7. And when the front 7 play wait just wait and see how champ’s game elevates.
His 10 yard cushions will not look so funny when he’s running the other way with the ball and reservations for 6.
With our offense, we only need a small amount of improvement on our defense to become a viable championship contender. Trading away our best defensive back, and the best DB to EVER play the game would not be a step in that direction.
This is my GAP, there are many like it but this one is mine. Without my GAP I am useless, without me, they will run through my GAP. I will protect my GAP and have my brothers back on his. I will not be moved from my GAP, I am a crazed dog that patrols this area and will defeat all who enter it. I own this GAP, it is mine. I bought it with blood and sweat. I will not be pushed. I will not be moved. This Sunday I will make a stand and a statement. --GO BRONCOS
Champ's injuries...
We had the best DB ever to play the game on special teams. Enough said.
This is my GAP, there are many like it but this one is mine. Without my GAP I am useless, without me, they will run through my GAP. I will protect my GAP and have my brothers back on his. I will not be moved from my GAP, I am a crazed dog that patrols this area and will defeat all who enter it. I own this GAP, it is mine. I bought it with blood and sweat. I will not be pushed. I will not be moved. This Sunday I will make a stand and a statement. --GO BRONCOS
Well the market for CBs just got thinner.
the raiders just signed aso to a 3 year deal

by 







































