Analyzing Running Backs--An Extension of MHR University
One of the more exciting positions to analyze, Running Backs have a whole range of responsibilities, styles and physical qualities, and many times formations are designed around what they are capable of doing.
When analyzing them you have to answer questions like: Is he a starter, a slasher, or a power running back? Does he have a second gear, or additional speed which can cut through the second level of defenses? Does he belong in a 2-back scheme, and if so, should it be I-formation or split-back? Is he primarily a fullback or can he be used in other ways? If he is best suited to FB, should he be primarily a blocker or a pass-catching outlet?
To answer these questions one merely needs to add up all of the parts. Read on to find out how to go about identifying and measuring the relevant qualities...

RUNNING GAME
| Durability | |
|
Injury history. Look at how often the player has left games early or lost effectiveness as the season has worn on. Does the player deliver the hit, or does he get hit? |
|
| Ball Security | |
|
Look for good decisions about when to change hands, such as shifting to the opposite side from an anticipated hit. When shifting ball position, player should maintain security, and when the ball is tucked away, all pressure points should be covered (ends of the football, though for some players, this may require two hands to additionally cover two sides of the football as well. This is related to the size of the player). When taking hit or being tackled, player should get two hands on the ball, and quickly. |
|
| Vision | |
|
This difficult-to-measure ability requires that as a viewer, you know where the play is designed to go. Once you know that, look to see how quickly the player makes a decision to commit to an angle and running lane. Additionally, when the player has committed to a running lane, note the direction of the blocking angles around him, and then note how his angle matches up with his blockers. The best way to think about this may be to look for "flow." Watching a play from on high, you can see the general direction of the play "flowing" in a particular direction. A runner who matches this flow when he chooses his running angle and lane will get extra yards just from the momentum of the play itself. An important note here is in the analysis of one-cut running schemes, because they teach the opposite: when the flow goes a certain way, the RB needs to choose a proper cutback lane, which makes him go in the opposite direction of the general flow. While this method is generally superior at creating open running lanes, it lacks the extra yardage of a "flow" system, and it requires a RB who is able to make second-level defenders miss, or who can bend an angle to such a degree that the defenders are unable to compensate. |
|
| Inside Running Ability | |
|
While toughness is a primary concern, look also for loose hips and an ability to swivel in tight spaces. Quickness off the snap is important, and decisive-cutting ability. The propensity to fall forward and gain yards is an important factor a back. |
|
| Outside Running Ability | |
|
Straight-line speed is the easy part of this equation, as it requires a back with strong cutting ability and a good vision for taking proper angles. This is a measure of a player's ability to get to the edge and turn the corner. |
|
| Elusiveness | |
|
Generally a measure of lateral shiftiness, it can also measure a back who makes himself small going through a hole. Some backs base this part of their game on "moves" such as head fakes, stiff-arms, or spins. Coupled with proper ball security, these moves can be extremely effective. |
|
| Power | |
|
Look for good forward lean, low shoulder pads. Legs should have a lot of drive and keep moving, and back should fall forward when tackled. On contact, back needs to be able to maintain balance, and look for backs who break tackles and reestablish momentum after contact. |
|
| Run Blocking | |
|
Note blocking-angles chosen specifically, and note performance on chop-blocks, lead-blocks and kick-out blocks. Smaller backs should be able to attack the hips and thighs without losing awareness of the defender or losing balance, while larger backs should be physical and use leg drive to engage and redirect defenders. |
|
| Blocking Effort | |
|
Does the back only give halfhearted effort? Watch out for backs who "block and watch," where they throw a block and then watch the defender instead of finding the next target. Does the back make the best blocking choice for his body type? If he doesn't, could be a sign that he isn't listening to his coaches, or doesn't care about that aspect of his game.. |
|
| Start out of Stance | |
|
A measure of the balance and quickness a player exhibits coming out of his stance and approaching the line of scrimmage. You are looking for consistency most of the time, and in certain formations like goal-line or short-yardage you are looking for explosiveness and quickness. In general, players should grade out adequately here, though occasionally you might note the surprising quickness of a larger player. |
|
PASSING GAME
| Hands | |
|
Does he catch with his hands? Is he able to catch outside his body? Does he look comfortable reaching out to get the ball or does he "double-catch" or bobble the ball? |
|
| Route Running | |
|
Are his routes out of the backfield well-timed? He should be coming open as the QB reaches his final check-down. Can he come off a block and be ready to catch a pass? |
|
| Pass Blocking | |
|
Does he use his hands to maintain separation from the defender? Does he move well laterally when choosing his blocks? How well does he pick up the blitz, and does he understand where pressure comes from pre-snap? Does he sustain his blocks? Look for a back who can choose proper angles and times the blocks well to avoid "high-low" penalties. |
|
6 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
Rec'd, Buzzed, and greatly appreciated
The volume of high quality work you’re putting together for us is amazing, styg
Hillis in '09
by Emmett Smith on Feb 22, 2009 12:38 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
combine
This year’s group wasn’t as fast but the speedier ones were surprises.
Peerman, Cedric -— 4.45
Johnson, Ian -——— 4.46
Sheets, Kory -——— 4.47
Brown, Andre -——— 4.49
Brown, Donald -—- 4.51
Williams, Javarris - 4.52—— 4.54
Goodson, Mike -
Scott, Bernard -—— 4.56
Coffee, Glen -——— 4.58
Lucky, Marlon -—— 4.59
Wells, Beanie -—— 4.59
Sorry about the strikethrough but I can’t find the glitch
by Colinski on Feb 22, 2009 2:00 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
further comments on Combine times
Ian Johnson rehabilitated himself with a faster than expected time, but there isn’t the speed in the RB group that last year’s group showed — from what I can recall.
Andre Brown showed very well for a big back.
Both ‘Beanie’ and Knowshon (not listed) did worse than expected, and this may hurt their stock. Wells was billed as much faster while Moreno was closer to his advertised speed. Another RB — Rashad Jennings — failed to demonstrate his speed.
Note: Moreno came in much heavier, at 217 lbs, so he may have alleviated concerns over his size, although the tradeoff could have been a missed chance to impress scouts with an improvement in speed. He’s been training at the camp of ex-Olympian Micheal Johnson, according to reports.
by Colinski on Feb 22, 2009 2:20 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Slower than last year
yeah I found this on USA Today:
Darren McFadden may have solidified himself as the elite athlete in this draft, but his speed shouldn’t overshadow the times turned in by the other junior backs. With times in the 4.4s turned in by fellow underclassmen Rashard Mendenhall, Jonathan Stewart, Felix Jones, Jamaal Charles, Ray Rice, Steve Slaton and Kevin Smith
McFadden’s referred-to speed was 4.33, plus, Chris Johnson ran that 4.24.
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on Feb 22, 2009 2:37 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
WRs are a different story
Some of the lesser names — Peerman, Sheets — helped themselves, as well as bigger names such as Donald Brown, but there wasn’t a lot of the raw speed at RB this year.
I like the WRs more this year than last, and I do think a lot of the top combine performers helped themselves get noticed in this very large and deep crop. We haven’t paid much attention to this position but the odds are fairly good that we’ll draft one because it’s the deepest position overall, in terms of yearly amount of picks produced, and it’s relatively strong this year, too. The depth at WR makes the prospect of finding a sleeper quite high. For instance, a Johhny Knox, etc., could be available late or as a CFA. And he could help us on kick returns besides offering a deep threat. There’s lots of good players to pick from. I don’t think most people realize the amount of talent that gets overlooked when draftniks draw up their lists.
by Colinski on Feb 22, 2009 3:18 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I was not impressed by any of the Running Backs
Knowshon did come into the Combine bigger, up 10 pounds, and he looked strong with 25 reps with the bench press. His two forty times were unimpressive as many of the backs, including Moreno, looked like they were “fighting” themselves and didn’t run smooth. The knock on Moreno has always been his long speed. He is lucky there is a lot of game tap on him as ultimately scouts will look to see game footage.
"I am not trying to start anything I am just saying that i think if you take Knowshon and draft D later you guys will be hella good next year" ...IamtheGreatest - The smartest Chiefs fan I ever had the priviledge of reading!
by Steve O' on Feb 22, 2009 2:38 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I was looking for the result from last year's combine
The bench press numbers weren’t unusual, but Moreno helped himself by showing some strength.
Royal posted 24 reps last year, but he’s an usual specimen with a reported 385 lb bench max.
“Smoothness” is very important. I don’t think players realize how much it contributes to speed, and it’s very important — as was commented — for pass routes. Keeping your upper body quiet allows you to keep your head steady, which helps when catching the ball, from what I understand.
by Colinski on Feb 22, 2009 3:40 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
One thing I wanted to see the official time of was the three cone drill...here are those results
Name Time
Scott, Bernard 6.82
Moreno, Knowshon 6.84
Ogbonnaya, Chris 6.85
Jennings, Rashad 6.86
Ringer, Javon 6.87
Bell, Kahlil 6.87
Goodson, Mike 6.89
Brown, Donald 6.93
Johnson, Ian 6.93
Sutton, Tyrell 6.94
Shows that Moreno still has his lateral foot quickness with the added weight. He also did fairly well in the 60 and 20 yard shuttle.
I would say Donald Brown and Ian Johnson helped themselves the most.
"I am not trying to start anything I am just saying that i think if you take Knowshon and draft D later you guys will be hella good next year" ...IamtheGreatest - The smartest Chiefs fan I ever had the priviledge of reading!
by Steve O' on Feb 22, 2009 4:49 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Ian coming in as a late guy. He had a good day.
And something I will say (maybe it will please you as well)…
Man, Knowshon is CUT!
by phantom818 on Feb 22, 2009 5:55 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Here is the classic RB argument...
Instead of the MHR faithful it’s Gruden and Dukes, the classic can’t you find a running back later?
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80ee1121
I find it interesting indeed…
"I am not trying to start anything I am just saying that i think if you take Knowshon and draft D later you guys will be hella good next year" ...IamtheGreatest - The smartest Chiefs fan I ever had the priviledge of reading!
by Steve O' on Feb 22, 2009 10:01 PM MST reply actions 1 recs
Great post
But from I can understand, thankfully, coaches are relying less and less on the stats of the combine.
Peyton Hillis in '09.
Name him---Mr. Balls....or Thunderpussy.
by Joe Medina on Mar 19, 2009 1:23 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 































