A Few Broncos Thoughts Meant To Be Said, Not Read
I had a few things I wanted to talk about on MHR Radio last night, but, well, some issues arose that prohibited me from doing the show. Instead of waiting another week to talk about them I decided to do it the old-fashioned way -- blog about it. These thoughts are entirely random so forgive me if they jump around.
What do Peyton Manning, the Pacific Ocean and the Pittsburgh Steelers have to do with the direction of the Denver Broncos? Easy. In 2005, after losing the AFC Championship Game to the Steelers, Mike Shanahan won the priveledge of coaching the AFC Pro Bowl team in Hawaii. His starting QB that week was Peyton Manning. I have long claimed that Jake Plummer's struggles against the Steelers, combined with having an up-close look at Manning, were the driving factors in Shanahan's decision to trade up in the 2006 NFL Draft and get Jay Cutler. That move, of course, changed the direction of the franchise forever.
Fast forward 3 years, and it has come full circle. Jay Cutler earned the right to attend his first Pro Bowl, and is joined in Hawaii by starter Peyton Manning. Cutler seems to be taking it all in, and he should. While Peyton knows to enjoy this game, as he should, he is also the ultimate competitor. He is a little like John Elway in that manner. I could see Manning battling to the death in a game of foos ball. He just has that fire in his gut that all the great ones have, the 'IT' that is the difference from the guys who have the physical ability and those that do something with it.
That will have to rub off on Cutler. Just watching how Manning goes about his business, how he interacts with the players and coaches from other teams, how he prepares, even in a glorified exhibition. This is going to be an excellent experience for Cutler and will help his growth as a starting QB in the NFL.
Like I said, Peyton Manning gets it. He gets that part of all of this is to be a mentor for the younger QBs. Does he have to? No. But that is what makes Manning great. Just another reason I can't stand Brett Favre. Let's face it, after all the knee issues last summer, Peyton would have every justified reason to have skipped the game in order to rest. He didn't, because he gets it. Favre, at some point, decided a free vacation in Hawaii was beneath him. Bad teammate, bad guy. Of course, Brett won't stay out of the limelight forever. Another showdown about where he will play next year is about to begin.
Let's move on to the Super Bowl. I try not to be held captive by the present. What that means is that I try to wait a little while before making 'absolute' statements about events instead of knee-jerking. Immediately after Super Bowl XLIII, you were hearing comments that it was the best Super Bowl ever. That, my friends, is simply foolish. Super Bowl XLIII was actually horrible for 3 quarters. Yes, there were some exciting plays, the Harrison Pick-6, for instance, but a few shining moments do not a great game make.
Think about it, as the 3rd quarter came to a close, the score was 20-7 Pittsburgh, there was a penalty called on almost every play, both teams couldn't convert chances in the Red Zone, and I was getting ready to call it a night. Only the Steelers' failure to put the game away with multiple chances inside the Cardinals 20 kept my interest. As Broncos fans, we know better than anyone. DO NOT SETTLE FOR FIELD GOALS! Every time the Broncos do, they pay for it. The Steelers did as well for most of the night, and they nearly paid dearly for it.
Yes, the fourth quarter was filled with excitement, and the final two TD drives, one by each team, were great, but Super Bowl XLIII, as a whole, doesn't make my Top-5.
John Elway was the most elusive QB I have ever seen. I am not talking about pure running ability. I am talking about the ability to escape pressure, keep plays alive and make something out of nothing. Ben Roethlisberger might be the closest thing to Elway since John retired. Big Ben wears #7 because Elway was his hero growing up, and he plays a lot like Elway in the pocket. Elway did run more than Ben, but his preference was to elude pressure, while still looking down field. Ben's arm isn't as strong, but there were times in the Super Bowl that Ben simply refused to get sacked. It is a 6th sense in a lot of ways, something Elway had as well.
Enough with the 'Kurt Warner is a Hall of Famer' talk. I mean, come on!. What Warner has done is take advantage of great players. In St. Louis it was Marshall Faulk, Torry Holt and Isaac Bruce. In Arizona it's Larry Fitzgerald and Anquon Boldin. Oh yea, then there is the fact that he's done it in controlled environments -- dome stadiums. Even his first 2 Super Bowls were played indoors. Kurt has won a lot of games in the NFL, but he IS NOT a Hall of Famer.
Feel free to chime in and I hope to have MHR Radio back up and running next week!
4 recs |
78 comments
|
Comments
I agree that it was not a Top 5 Super Bowl...maybe not even in my Top 10.
as for John Elway being elusive…I agree, but I also want to point out that he owns the sack record by like 100+ sacks. lol
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
by Tim Lynch on Feb 5, 2009 11:22 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
And no player has been sacked more the past 2 or 3 years than Ben…..But damn, when it matters the most, neither one of these guys takes a sack.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
by John Bena on Feb 5, 2009 11:23 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree on the #7 similarities
the context of their success isn’t the same, but that spin out of pressure with the completion to the TE was very elway-esque…
Concision in style, precision in thought, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 5, 2009 11:54 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
There were many times during the game (as there have been over the last several years) where I have watched Roethlisberger and seen John. He’s got that similar knack of getting it done when it counts. Just like John, his first SB win came more on the legs of his running back, and with a poor individual performance on his own part. This second one, just like John’s last game, he was much more impressive and made a lot of big throws.
by Douglas A. Lee on Feb 5, 2009 2:15 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I said I agreed with ya! lol
He may hold the record by when he did take a sack(ala 1987 championship game), he would throw 19 yards to get the first down by a yard on 3rd and 18 with time running out need a score.
Or he would scramble for a first down on 4th and 6…then throw for a first down on 4th and 10 with less than two minutes to go 98 yards from pay dirt. ;-)
Elway was the greatest
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
by Tim Lynch on Feb 6, 2009 10:49 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
If Kurt had won would he be a HOF QB in your opinion?
by ThorpeBroncosfan on Feb 5, 2009 12:13 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
In MY opinion
No. QBs do not “win” Super Bowls. Teams do. Kurt Warner’s career, in a nutshell:
1999: Playoffs (Super Bowl)
2000: Playoffs (Bad year, lots of picks)
2001: Playoffs (Lose to Pats in SB)
2002: Crap year (No playoffs)
2003: Crap year (Benched in St. Louis, later cut)
2004: Crap year (No playoffs, cut by Giants)
2005: Crap year
2006: Crap year (Benched for Matt Leinart)
2007: Decent year (No playoffs)
2008: Playoffs (Lose to Steelers in Super Bowl)
So, for most of Kurt Warner’s career (5 of 9 years) he is not helping his team make the playoffs. He was benched by three different teams, and cut by two. Yes, he has won 2 league MVPs, a Super Bowl, and played in three Super Bowls. That is indeed impressive. No one is disputing that.
But real, TRUE HoFers are consistently great, year in and out. Warner is as up and down as it gets. If people consider THAt a HoF caliber career, people have very low standards.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.
by BigBlueShoe on Feb 5, 2009 12:22 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Can't argue with that
If Warner’s resume to date is HOF worthy, then surely Terrell Davis is worthy as well. As much as I loved TD and as good as he was from 1996-1998, I can’t really make a wholehearted argument that he deserves to be in the Hall. There are too many other legitimate “snubs” that are more qualified.
by MattR on Feb 5, 2009 1:04 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent point
If Terrell Davis is not in the HoF, Kurt Warner isn’t good enough to clean the women’s restroom in Canton, let alone have his “talking bust” reside there.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.
by BigBlueShoe on Feb 5, 2009 2:28 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
by Tim Lynch on Feb 6, 2009 10:51 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
In a word, no.
Again, this is the M’n-F’n HALL OF FAME. The best of the best. My expectations are a bit higher than alot of the talking heads that like “a good story”.
Though, I will say this. If Kurt Warner gets in the Hall on the back of a few solid years, then Terrell Davis HAS TO GET THERE.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
by John Bena on Feb 5, 2009 12:26 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
What's that I see in the clouds?
….Sh…a….n….no……n ….. Sh….ar….. pe….. wa….s ….ro…b….bed…..
Hmm. I wonder what that means.
Blast and botheration.
by Silverblood on Feb 5, 2009 12:28 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
You so right...
So so so right….
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
by John Bena on Feb 5, 2009 12:31 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't claim credit
Even the clouds know. Which is remarkable, seeing as it’s dark.
Blast and botheration.
by Silverblood on Feb 5, 2009 12:36 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting points...here's my 2 cents
+1 on your Peyton statements…I hate losing to him, but he is what I look for in a QB…drive, passion, commitment to the game.
Absolutely agree with you on the “best superbowl ever” junk. It was a good game. It was not a great game. Now, if I were a Steelers or Cardinals fan, I’d have a different opinion, but I’m not. I totally agree about it not being a top 5.
Big Ben is really really good under pressure. Like Elway he must have really good hearing. People always thought Elway had a 6th sense, but I remember one of his hof interviews where they asked him about it and he said, “I could hear them coming…even from the blind side.” 270+ lb linemen must not be that stealthy. :)
I disagree with you on Warner…yes he’s succeeded with talent around him, but he has to make reads and get the ball out there before people can catch it. Elway didn’t win any superbowls until we surrounded him with talent…they weren’t even competitive until that happened. Warner is iffy right now about going into the hof, but he definitely deserves consideration.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Feb 5, 2009 12:19 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Warner
The thing is, Elway single-handedly took 3 football teams to the Super Bowl. Warner’s only had success when he’s had great, and I mean GREAT talent around him. Super Bowls, to me, do not guarantee the Hall of Fame. In fact, I’d say it should be decided more on what a guy does when the team isn’t very good.
A look at Elway’s stats wouldn’t blow anyone away, per se, but he elevated the lackluster talent around him. Warner, conversely, has been ELEVATED by the talent around him.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
by John Bena on Feb 5, 2009 12:24 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I know...
That Elway went to 5 Super Bowls, but I was specifically talking about the 86, 87 and 89 teams.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
by John Bena on Feb 5, 2009 12:27 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I actually think Warner is close to HOF consideration.
I think it’s important to NOT compare Warner to Elway. This conversation is about whether Warner belongs in the Hall of Fame. It’s not a question of Who’s the Greatest QB of All. Elway is in the conversation of Best Player and Best QB both. Warner, I think, is in the HOF conversation but not the Greatest QB one.
Elway is not the standard for HOF consideration. If he were, there would be 5-10 QB’s in the HOF – Montana, Unitas, Starr, Graham, Marino and eventually Favre. I’m surely omitting a name or three, but you get my point.
by Douglas A. Lee on Feb 5, 2009 2:21 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno
Elways stats blow me away…he’s like top 5 in a bunch of the major categories.
I still disagree with you though…all that talent on the Cardinals didn’t elevate Linehart’s play that much. The Cardinals are a completely different team with Warner at the helm. Also, Warner has done superbly this year with no real running threat. I’m okay saying he isn’t a shoe-in, but Warner is a very talented QB and deserves consideration.
By the way…I agree if Warner gets in, so should TD.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Feb 5, 2009 1:48 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Leinart's play WAS elevated
he’s just not that good. Guru isn’t saying that Warner is a bad QB, just that he isn’t HoF worthy. There have been a lot of excellent QB’s that weren’t HoF’ers.
by jack_ on Feb 5, 2009 2:15 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
but that isn’t how it reads to me…I don’t see much credit being given to Warner for his play at all. If Warner is so bad then Linehart should be able to do just as good since it is the talent around the QB that is making them good.
I’m fine if Warner is an excellent QB that doesn’t make it, but my point is he absolutely deserves consideration and discussion.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Feb 5, 2009 2:20 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Semantics, perhaps
I’m just saying that being someone who ISN’T a HoF’er and being a very good player aren’t mutually exclusive. Not every Pro Bowl calibur player is someone who merrits serious consideration for the HoF.
That said, I DO think he deserves consideration. I also agree that he and TD have more or less the same flaws and thus, they deserve the same fate, whatever it may be.
by jack_ on Feb 5, 2009 2:48 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe that's the key . . .
The GREAT QBs have been able to elevate the talent around them, as opposed to game managers, which most QBs have been.
This is a plateau that I don’t believe Ben has reached. He can take advantage of the best of good receivers, but he cannot elevate them, as Elway did the “Three Amigos,” who were really not as good as Elway made them appear.
That’s a pretty exclusive club, actually (i.e., ability to raise talent levels). Over the years, Norm Van Brocklyn had that, and so did Johnny Unitas. Joe Namath had it for a brief time. Maybe Montana, but how could one elevate the talent levels of Jerry Rice, John Tayler, Dwight Clark, and Roger Craig, along with TEs such as Brent Jones and Russ Francis?
Ben is terrifically elusive and good at turning a busted play into something. But he gets a whole lot of help from a very good supporting cast . . . something Elway never enjoyed to the fullest until the advent of Rod, Eddie Mac, and TD. So, while I give Ben his props, I am reticent to cast him into a legendary status. Peyton Manning and Tom Brady exist on a plateau above the rest, and Cutler has the tools to join them . . . I think he will. Some of the rest, such as Ben, have “it,” but they likely will never have “IT.”
IMHO.
Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy
by AZDynamics on Feb 5, 2009 3:15 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
What did Ben have on the offensive side of the ball this year?
by purplesocks on Feb 5, 2009 3:47 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
The Pittsburgh offense really wasn't very good this year
They were 19th in points and 21st in yards. That’s the same range as the Titans, 49ers, Chiefs, and Jags.
No one would suggest Collins, Garrard, and whoever QB’ed the 49’ers and Cheifes were anything special.
by jack_ on Feb 5, 2009 4:14 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
You're right, jack
And those stats could have been a lot better if Big Ben had a decent o line to play behind. Oddly, I think that he got better over the season at throwing on the run. He sure did get a lot of practice.
In Goodman We Trust
by Emmett Smith on Feb 6, 2009 1:34 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Something to consider
Ben has a problem with making his reads and uses his clutch scrambling crutch to overcome that. To me he doesn’t seem near as sharp as an elite QB should be…a good QB coach would help him get out trouble by going through his reads and making quicker decisions…
And a decent Oline wouldn’t hurt his performance either.
Good…not great.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Feb 5, 2009 4:18 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I DO think that he's a great fit for that offense
He’s not an elite QB, but his ability to scramble and buy time means he does as well as just about any QB could in that offense. On the other hand, I don’t think he’d be spectacular in a great offense.
by jack_ on Feb 5, 2009 4:36 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Elway's 6th sense
Big Ben is really really good under pressure. Like Elway he must have really good hearing. People always thought Elway had a 6th sense, but I remember one of his hof interviews where they asked him about it and he said, "I could hear them coming…even from the blind side." 270+ lb linemen must not be that stealthy. :)
I remember one interview where Elway went through the various things that let him know when to get moving. At the end of the interview he said, “Oh, yeah. And shadows.”
Truly the light is sweet, and a pleasant thing it is for my eyes to behold the sun.
Ecclesiastes
by bradley on Feb 5, 2009 12:37 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
rick reilly
from SI made a funny comment about that, something about how hard that made it for defensive coaches trying to teach their players how to get their hands on John… “Dammit Thomas, you’ve got to quit throwing so much shadow!!”
Concision in style, precision in thought, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 5, 2009 4:12 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I have that article.
I love reading it sometimes, just for fun. The #1 greatest sports article I have ever read. It’s too bad ESPN had to steal Reilly from SI…
Average Bronco Fan's IQ: 120!
Average MHR Mod's IQ: 145!
John Madden's IQ: Fried Chicken!
Click here to beat these scores!!
by papigrande on Feb 5, 2009 4:15 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Here it is, in case any of you want to read it.
It comes very highly recommended.
Average Bronco Fan's IQ: 120!
Average MHR Mod's IQ: 145!
John Madden's IQ: Fried Chicken!
Click here to beat these scores!!
by papigrande on Feb 5, 2009 4:17 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Hmmmmmmmm . . .
Kurt Warner had Marshall Faulk, Isaac Bruce, Torry Holt, Anquan Boldin and Larry Fitzgerald at his disposal during various points in his career . . .
I like to compare Warner to Johnny Unitas, who no one argues is a Hall of Famer (it’s too easy – former cast-off becomes superstar). While Warner is no Johnny Unitas, he’s about the only comparable I can come up with.
Unitas, at various points in his career, was able to use the assistance of the likes of Alan Ameche, Raymond Berry, Lenny Moore, Jimmy Orr and John Mackey (just to name a few).
I understand where you’re coming from on the dome front . . . but despite the whole controlled-environment thing, the fact is that you still have to perform on the field in an ultra-competitive environment, which is something Kurt Warner has done through most of his career (I’ll give him a mulligan for his last two years in St. Louis when he was clearly not right, and for the season with the Giants in which he was warming the hot seat for some dude named Eli).
But to me, Kurt Warner is a Hall of Famer not because of the rags-to-riches story . . . but because he is a pretty damned good quarterback. I’ve never seen a QB before who was able to get rid of the football as quickly as he could, under considerable front seven pressure, and deliver the ball ACCURATELY like Warner has done in the past (and still does). And he’s put up unbelievable numbers in his career, despite getting off to a “late start” (he was 28 when he got his Rams breakthrough . . . no one had given him a true chance before that).
Add 4 Pro Bowl selections, 2 NFL MVP awards, a Super Bowl victory (and Super Bowl MVP award) and three Super Bowl appearances (including the top three passing days in Super Bowl history – not exactly easy to pull off even if you DO have skilled players around you) . . . and if you ask me, you’re looking at a gold jacket and a bronze bust.
If this is all coming out due to my Midwestern bias, I apologize. But I seem to think the man is a Hall of Famer. Then again, it won’t matter, because he probably won’t get in anyway. (Shannon Sharpe, anyone?)
"Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile." -- Vince Lombardi
(No, I'm not a Packers fan)
by Donut King on Feb 5, 2009 12:35 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Very good points
You said things I was thinking better than I could.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Feb 5, 2009 1:49 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Well . . .
a bit of research was involved, too. Couldn’t do all THAT on my own.
"Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile." -- Vince Lombardi
(No, I'm not a Packers fan)
by Donut King on Feb 5, 2009 2:54 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Welcome Aboard, Josh McDaniels!
by Colorado_Kitten on Feb 5, 2009 2:01 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree to disagree...
He’s good, no doubt, when surrounded with awesome talent. When not, he is average at best.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
by John Bena on Feb 5, 2009 2:03 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
No more Quarterbacks for the HoF....
until these defensive bad boys are all in…
http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_1355_Canton_should_call_these_legends.html
Gotta love the Steve Atwater love there!
Besides when it comes to the QB’s of this era well that can really only be Brady, Manning & Favre (although even with Mr Interception Favre I have my reservations). To add Warner as well would mean that yet again more deserving OL and defensive players are snubbed. Are you really saying that Kurt Warner is a better QB then Steve Atwater was a safety or say Cortez Kennedy was a DT? No way.
if the HoF was given out using proper percentages then no more than 2/3 QB’s should be getting in every decade. Give the other players a chance.
by British Bronco on Feb 5, 2009 4:09 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate
that Brady is such a shoo-in for the HoF. I really think he should have to do more to get in.
I am Jack's unbridled optimism.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Feb 6, 2009 12:20 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
Brady has been to 4 SB’s, won three of them, and has two SB MVP’s. He also has a league MVP after QB’ing the highest scoring offense of all time. That’s already a better resume than many HoF QB’s
by jack_ on Feb 6, 2009 8:48 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a great career
and I’m not taking any of that away, but I’m looking at it from the standpoint of “If he never played another down, should he be in?” and my answer would be no. Naturally, if he plays another 6 years and even comes close to matching what he’s already done, he’ll be a HoF lock. The people voting on the HoF are making such a huge deal out of longevity in regards to a guy like TD, and I think the same standard should be held for everyone.
I am Jack's unbridled optimism.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Feb 6, 2009 4:50 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
by Tim Lynch on Feb 6, 2009 5:20 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
"If he never played another down, should he be in?"
Yes he would. Brady has been amazing this decade
by purplesocks on Feb 6, 2009 5:25 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I have to agree. Brady quarterbacked a team to 4 Super Bowls....
and a nearly perfect season. That to me is enough to get into the hall of fame…maybe not first ballot. lol After all, there are some guys who may not be as good as Brady, but they have been waiting a while and deserve their fair share of the hall of fame pie. Right?
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
by Tim Lynch on Feb 6, 2009 5:50 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not entirely sold
on saying he isn’t a HoF player if he never plays another down, but my original point is that there is seemingly NO discussion about it. I know right know everyone can sit back and say “Brady is an easy HoFer”, but again, were he to never play another down, in 5 years, would we still remember him the same? I honestly think that part of TD’s problem getting in has been the great success that everyone has seen Denver have with other players at the same position. How would we remember Brady if he didn’t play again, and Cassell became a stud in that offense? Would Brady still look like the same amazing player that we see him as now, or would that be tarnished?
This is why I said I believe he has to do a little bit more. If numbers were the main reason for someone getting into the HoF, Floyd Little, Randy Gradishar, and Shannon Sharpe would be in the Hall right now. Legacy is an extremely important factor, and if Brady never played again, and especially if the Pats continued having great success, I think his would look very different than it does to us at this particular moment.
I am Jack's unbridled optimism.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Feb 6, 2009 9:40 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Err
“has seen Denver have great success”
I am Jack's unbridled optimism.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Feb 6, 2009 9:41 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
I was right originally. I really shouldn’t be allowed to read my own writings. I get lost in my language too often. Buh.
I am Jack's unbridled optimism.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Feb 7, 2009 4:40 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously?
So let me ask you this…
If Tom Brady doesn’t already have HOF credentials, then how in the world would Terrell Davis ever get in?
by Douglas A. Lee on Feb 6, 2009 9:41 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Enjoyed your thoughts...
Here’s my cent (i lost my other penny):
1. so we can expect to see Cutler pimping any and every product now? Master Card commericals here I come! :)
2. I think the most important trait of peypey is that he’s a student of the game… I want Cutler to mimic that…and bust his ass like peypey does…
3. SB ending was great…and I have no problem saying it was one of the better endings..(although I still hold Montana’s drive against Cincy in high regard). But best SB ever… PUH-LEASE…. also, did anyone else feel the game is hampered big time by all the tv timeouts? it felt like it took till the end before the game got into a groove….
4. Big Ben is damn elusive, but the closest thing to Elway’s elusivity is McNabb—when healthy. Hands down….
5. I have nothing personal against Warner aside from my personal feelings toward athletes and the way they go about their expressing their faith…. I think his career is remarkable simply because he’s beaten so many odds. Yes, he had incredible talent around him and the right offenses at the time (Giants offense and the Meadowlands were like kryptonite to him). If I ran the HOF I’d truly make it for the elite of the elite (for example next year, Jerry Rice yes, Tim Brown and Chris Carter no).. and not just a Hall of Very Good (HoVG), which I think it has become (Cooperstown is the same way). However, because it’s not truly for the elite, I’m not going to lose sleep if Warner gets in… The fact that the Cardinals made it to the SuperBowl is amazing… Seriously, the Cardinals…That’s like the Clippers going to the NBA championship…
6. I like cheese and believe everyone should… :)
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Feb 5, 2009 1:55 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Really?
You didn’t think Cris Carter was one of the best WRs ever? I can see Tim Brown being told no, but Carter? His ability to make the tough catch and get both feet in was unlike anything I have ever seen. The man was a magician in the red zone. I can’t imagine not putting Carter in the HoF.
I am Jack's unbridled optimism.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Feb 6, 2009 12:23 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
If had my way, I'd make the HOF for the "mount rushmore" of players
or…another idea is to enshire players after each decade, almost like the All-Decade teams… I think Chris Carter was a damn good player, but he doesn’t crack my “Super Hero” HOF…:) For example, only Elway could make it into my Hall from the Broncos….
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Feb 6, 2009 8:43 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
ZOMG the best Super Bowl EVAR!!1!1!!
Not so much. Too many penalties, and the only reason it was close was because the Steelers let their collective foot off the gas. Here’s my top 5:
1. XXXII Broncos 31, Packers 24, Because I’m a homer.
2. XXXIV Rams 23, Titans 16, Greatest finish in Super Bowl history
3. XLII Giants 17, Patriots 14, Mostly because of the situation
4. XVI 49ers 26, Bengals 21, because of the finish
5. XXXVI Patriots 20, Rams 17, back when the Pats were underdogs
Also up there are XXXVIII (Pats v. Panthers), the one good Cowboys-Steelers matchup, and then this one.
It’s kind of interesting to see how the games are on average much closer now than they were in the past. Ever since XXXII, there seems to have been a run of very competitive ’Bowls.
Average Bronco Fan's IQ: 120!
Average MHR Mod's IQ: 145!
John Madden's IQ: Fried Chicken!
Click here to beat these scores!!
by papigrande on Feb 5, 2009 2:02 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Run of close 'Bowls
SI has an interesting article about the run of close SB’s:
Golden Age of Super Bowls
The author points out that in the first 31 Super Bowls there were just 2 lead changing scores in the final 3 minutes, wheras in the last 12, there have been 12.
by jack_ on Feb 5, 2009 2:27 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Was just gonna mention it
http://coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_2663_The_Golden_Age_of_the_Super_Bowl.html
Here’s a link to the original story, from coldhardfacts – it was reprinted in SI. Papi does a good job of calling the best ones.
Truly the light is sweet, and a pleasant thing it is for my eyes to behold the sun.
Ecclesiastes
by bradley on Feb 5, 2009 2:30 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
One Good Thing
I’ve read before that Cutler is a demon in the fillm room. Shanahan mentioned it again the other day. Nice to hear. If he begins to really see what his options are and gets the direction that he clearly needs, he will be even better. A lot better, and that’s saying a great deal. You’re right – learning from Manning will be a great chance for him.
In Goodman We Trust
by Emmett Smith on Feb 5, 2009 2:07 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Enough of all the manlove for Peyton Manning
I’m tired of all the manlove going around for Peyton Manning. I think he is entirely overrated. He is a good QB, but the truth of the matter is that the NFL changed its rules around the time Peyton came into the league allowing offensive linemen to hold, hold, hold, hold, hold. The Colts offensive staff was one of the first to take the new way of not calling holding to the extreme, and afforded Peyton with pass protection that no other QB in league history had been given.
Ironically it took Shanahan too many years to figure this out. Think he finally got there in the last couple of years, and based on how many sacks the Broncos gave up this last year, was on his way to perfecting an offense based on lineman that could hold. Bellichick / McDaniels figured it out a few years before while Shanny was still trying to zone block / run / bootleg rollout down the field.
Of course, it didn’t take long for others to copy, and for defenses to even get more aggressive in trying to get to QB’s, but the fact of the matter is that without the change in rules, the timing based offense of Manning and the Colts would have never thrived like it has.
Could you imagine Marino, Elway, Stabler, Stauback, and even Peyton’s old man Archie if they had been given the time and pass blocking afforded by the rules that Manning has gotten. Back in the day, holding was called if you extended your arms, then if you grasped with your hands, then if you grasped outside of the shoulder, now only if you practically tackle someone or grab them around the throat.
To me, Peyton is the poster boy QB who should be dressed in pink and required to wear a Tutu while on the field.
by MTBroncoFan on Feb 5, 2009 2:47 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I respectfuly disagree.
Every team has the same rules for offensive holding that the Colts do. Not every team has dominance at the QB position.
In my humble opinion (and I’m no Colts fan), Manning is a true elite. He is probably the most intelligent QB I’ve seen (even if he doesn’t “present” that way). His situational awareness is awe inspiring to me in that he can throw a pass without even looking to his WR. The timing route system (as employed by Indy) probably has more demand on a QB than any other system I can think of. And to add to all of this intelligence, he can throw a football and put it on the money.
I live in Indiana, and can also vouch that he’s a heck of an individual in terms of his community participation (I very briefly met him when he was raising funds for his "Peyton Manning’s Childrens hospital for the St. Vincent hospital network). And he was pretty good on Saturday Night Live.
But most importantly, on the field, I wouldn’t want to face a Manning led offense. And it isn’t his offensive line that would concern me.
Just my opinion.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Feb 5, 2009 6:08 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Plus, he's funny.
I loved that Super Bowl Gatorade commercial with all the big athletes and inspirational figures talking about how they got where they are. "Hard work, dedication, play hard when no one’s watching, be a role model, blah, blah, cliche, blah blah.
Peyton Manning: “I cheat.”
Average Bronco Fan's IQ: 120!
Average MHR Mod's IQ: 145!
John Madden's IQ: Fried Chicken!
Click here to beat these scores!!
by papigrande on Feb 5, 2009 9:22 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree to disagree
His knowledge of the game is encyclopedic. His ability to adjust the play at the line is currently the best in the NFL and has been for some time. His precision in passing is excellent. It’s difficutl for me to lay his tremendous knowledge and skills at the feet of ’his lineman can hold".
In Goodman We Trust
by Emmett Smith on Feb 5, 2009 4:20 PM MST reply actions 2 recs
Rec'd comment
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Feb 5, 2009 6:08 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with al ot of this conversation
This is what I love about talking football.
The Montana vs. Elway thing is like the Big Ben vs. Brady thing will be someday
The ‘Bellichick (or Walsh) created Brady’s (or Montana’s) success’ argument versus the ‘Elway/Big Ben is a playmaker on an average team’ argument.
They’re all winners, they’re the best of the best.
by super7 on Feb 5, 2009 8:24 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Montana and Brady
But, Super7, the ignorant give the nod to Montana and Brady because they won more SB’s(although Big Ben has a chance to catch Brady). That is how stupid some fans are. Now, Montana was seen to have more potential coming out of college than Brady did. I heard a story of how a Packer scout or GM was upset that they didn’t get Montana. He came in after the Pack made their third round pick in 79, and he said something like “tell me you took Montana”. I think it was HC Bart Starr that said “we didn’t”, and I heard that the guy was so upset he had to go out in the hall and vent. The Cowboys, when the third round came, had him as the top player on their board, but they passed him over because they had Staubach and Danny White. But, that being said, if Joe would have went to those other locations, I think he might have done a decent job, but he wouldn’t be in the Hall today.
Brady, on the other hand, wasn’t too highly ranked at all, as a lot of you know. I saw his combine pics 9 years ago, and he almost looked like a malnutritioned Ethiopian. He goes to another team, and he is forgotten. The Pats made him a lot better than what he really is. I would take Elway over either one, and Big Ben. Ronnie Lott even said back in 1984 that, if John was in their system, he would be one of the NFL passing leaders.
by PABroncofan on Feb 5, 2009 10:47 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
No no no no no
If you want to make the argument that Brady has benefited from playing for the Pats, then do so. DON’T say that Brady can’t be better than Montana because Montana was drafted in the 3rd round and Brady was drafted in the 6th. That’s totally bogus logic.
by jack_ on Feb 6, 2009 8:34 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
It seemed more of a "other teams could see Montana's talent and not Brady's" comment
That being said. There were several people who were very successful even though they were low draft picks (see Rod Smith).
Victor Frankl:
What man actually needs is not a tensionless state but rather the striving and struggling for some goal worthy of him. What he needs is not the discharge of tension at any cost, but the call of a potential meaning waiting to be fulfilled by him.
Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms – to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.
by wyoeng on Feb 6, 2009 7:16 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously
other teams didn’t see Montana’s talent- or they would have picked him sooner. Maybe they thought he had a high upside, but to suggest that any team had any inkling of what a good QB he would be is bogus. And, like you said, sometimes players are very talented and scouts just don’t see it.
by jack_ on Feb 6, 2009 9:01 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Rod Smith was so underrated . . .
that he wasn’t even drafted.
My opinion = He’s a HoF’er. But as we all know, that’s a pipe dream.
"Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile." -- Vince Lombardi
(No, I'm not a Packers fan)
by Donut King on Feb 7, 2009 9:30 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
He will end up like Lionel Taylor....
a great player who will never be recognized nationally, but will always be remembered by their fans.
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
by Tim Lynch on Feb 9, 2009 2:27 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Damn straight.
Rod Smith was, in the tail end of his career, THE leader of the Broncos offense . . . no matter what changes were taking place, you knew Rod was the one rallying the troops.
Oh, and he was a hell of a receiver too. Not just catching the ball, either.
"Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile." -- Vince Lombardi
(No, I'm not a Packers fan)
by Donut King on Feb 9, 2009 11:22 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Brady
“If you want to make the argument that Brady has benefited from playing for the Pats, then do so. DON’T say that Brady can’t be better than Montana because Montana was drafted in the 3rd round and Brady was drafted in the 6th. That’s totally bogus logic”. Quote
I didn’t say that Montana was better than Brady because he was picked higher. I think that he was better because he was more mobile and athletic.
“other teams didn’t see Montana’s talent- or they would have picked him sooner. Maybe they thought he had a high upside, but to suggest that any team had any inkling of what a good QB he would be is bogus. And, like you said, sometimes players are very talented and scouts just don’t see it”.
Apparently, that Packer scout, or coach(or whatever the heck he was) must have been in the minority of the guys that were impressed by Montana. Tom Danyluk, author of the book “The Super 70’s”, did an interview with Art Rooney, Jr, and asked him if they were interested in Montana thirty years ago. Art said that, basically, they weren’t that impressed with Joe. They thought he threw a soft ball, and they were more into the bigger, more stronger armed QB’s.
by PABroncofan on Feb 6, 2009 9:40 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I disagree a little...
Warner may or may not be HOF material, I’ll give everyone that. But he’s accomplished what he’s accomplished and you can’t take that away. While we can say he’s been blessed with talent around him in his good years, I don’t think you can hold that against Warner. Does that mean he could be a more well rounded QB? Possibly.
But like I said, he’s done what he’s done and you can’t take that away. I am not sure it is straight up HOF worthy work but it should be worth the conversation.
As far as the Super Bowl, I have to respectfully disagree wholeheartedly. Most of the penalties were in the second half, and the Steelers – while showing some weakness in the red zone, played some great ball control offense and the Cards really stepped up on defense to keep the score within reason.
There may not have been a light the scoreboard up airshow in the first half but both teams slogged it out well, and when you consider the fact the Cards touched the ball all of twice by the time they finally scored, they were lucky to be in it at all at halftime.
Arizona adjusted nicely at the half and came out swinging. I think this was a classig game plan, ball control offense for a half and then both teams began to figure each other out in the second half, with the cards clearly holding the advantage.
Personally, I think the Steelers win was pure grit – I don’t think by the end of the game they had an answer for the Cards’ offense, they simply imposed their will on their opponent and the Cards, while playing a gutsy game, were simply outclassed where it mattered.
Best Sb ever? Possibly. But I don’t think the word ‘horrible’ even belongs in the conversation where this game was concerned.
by TheMastermind on Feb 8, 2009 3:49 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Elway and Cutler
Maybe this is a little off tangent, or talked about before, but on the subject of Elway, I don’t know if Cutler has the intangibles that he had. He was great in the most important category: wins. He fought hard to get those wins. I just don’t get the feel from Cutler that he’ll put himself out there to win. Oh, he’ll make the risky throw (and be picked off), but he won’t do the other things. He doesn’t keep the play alive with his feet until someone opens up; he just fires. He won’t go for a timely scramble when the Broncos need 6 yards. I see 97 yard drives stopped by him angrily throwing 4 times into coverage. He can compare arms with Elway if he wants, but he is lacking in the W category.
by NDbronco on Feb 9, 2009 3:32 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Elway had a will to win...Cutler has a will to compete.
The two are similar, but also completely different. My hope is that Cutler will always have tons of talent around him so that his will to compete turns into many victories for us. As bad as this sounds….Brett Favre had a will to compete…Joe Montana had a will to win. The two are different, but both types can win Championships for their teams. ;-)
Is there such a thing as a Playstation 3 Anonymous? I can't seem to stop thinking about or playing COD 4 and COD 5. I hear this is quite normal for a teenager, but I haven't been a teenager since Bill Clinton was frolicking with interns.
by Tim Lynch on Feb 10, 2009 11:04 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs

by 





































