Mock Draft 2.0
Yo fellow MHR bretheren. I have looked hard and come up with my take on what I would like to see. We have 9 picks so far. I will assume we get a 4th rounder for Tony (although I'd be irritated with anything less than a 3rd rounder), which gives us 10 picks, with 2 4ths, 2 5ths and 2 7ths. My big emphasis is on building / fortifying our front 7 and our O-line. We have holes, let's fill 'em.
Here goes . . .
1st - Rey Maualuga - Thumper ILB (obviously). He will give us a presence and put fear in opposing offenses. If Rey's gone, I would take Tyson Jackson. If Rey / Jackson are gone, I'd go with Cushing for his versatility. I still believe the best thing we could do here is trade down for an additional 2nd or 3rd round pick and take Larry English (Rush OLB) somewhere in the 20-24 range. Obviously, if Raji or Orakpo fall, they would be great options at #12.
2nd - Max Unger - Top flight C from Oregon - He's projected to the early part of the 2nd round. If he's not there, I would like us to look at Delmas or Chung, both are versatile, physical ball hawking FS prospects. My favorite guy here would be Larry English, but I don't anticipate that he will fall this far. If we get Unger, Chung or Delmas in the 2nd, I'd be happy.
3rd - Paul Kruger - rush olb from Utah - He's got a low second round grade, but I hope he'll fall to us in the third. High character guy, above average in every respect, good size, speed, can rush the passer, stop the run and drop into coverage. Perfect fit.
4th - Evander Hood or Terrence Taylor - Stout NT / DE type, one of these guys should be there in round 4. If Ron Brace or Fili Moala somehow slip to here, take them!!!!!! However, I feel they'll both be gone.
4th - Shonn Green - RB Iowa - Good size / physical guy who ran the zone blocking scheme at Iowa and performed well against bigtime competition.
5th - Kraig Urbik - OG - Kuper seems solid, hamilton is going into his 9th year and Lichtenteiger could be good but I still think we need more depth along that front / for the future. Tackle is an option, but we have pro bowlers there and Polumbus is a versatile back-up.
5th - Deon Butler - WR Penn State - really good footwork, smart, fast receiver from Penn State. Robiskie or quan cosby or Butler's teammate, Derrick Williams could be worth a look here as well.
6th - Mitch King - Hard worker / blue collar DE from Iowa. At the very least he will come in an compete / work 100% 100% of the time. Good lockerroom guy and could develop into a stud in our front 7. At worst, he gives good depth, character and a tireless motor / work ethic.
7th - Dorell Scott from Clemson or George Hypolite from CO - either of these guys would be a legit 3-4 D-lineman and could compete.
7th - Best football player available - basically whoever McXanders has at the top of their big board when all the carnage has settled.
Logic says we should take a NT in the 1st or 2nd and a C in the 4th, the opposite of what I proposed. Two thoughts: 1) I did this because I have a mancrush on Max Unger and think he would anchor our line for years to come. I know we need a NT, but Rey, Max, Paul Kruger at 1, 2, 3 would be too good to pass up if it's there. 2) Trading down in the first would solve this problem by allowing us to get Max and still address deficiencies in our front 7 early in the draft.
Thoughts???
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
0 recs |
40 comments
Comments
Evander Hood in the 4th? I thought he was projected late 2nd early 3rd. :)
I wouldn’t mind nabbing Terrance Taylor though :)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Mar 6, 2009 1:17 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Taylor is really the pick there
the other guys – probalby not, but you never know who will fall.
by GJcontingent-rAd on Mar 6, 2009 1:27 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah.
No way Ziggy lasts to the 4th. You know what? Yhis weekend I’m going to do a post about the second round. There are about a dozen prospects projected in the second round that I’m absolutely in love with, and Hood is atop that list.
I picked the wrong weekend to quit sniffing glue...
by papigrande on Mar 6, 2009 2:09 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd put Brace, Hood and Scott
as the potential NTs after Raji
Hillis in '09
by Emmett Smith on Mar 8, 2009 11:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I love him
but I think he is a bit too small for our 3-4. If he gained 20 pounds I’d be all for it but a bit too small so i would choose ron brace.
"Hey Raiders fans!!! If you leave now you can beat traffic!"
-Rod Smith
by GarretBarnes on Mar 8, 2009 1:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely
His draft reports suggest that his frame will accomodate andother 20+ lb. If that’s true, he will work out well at DE in the meantime, much as Fields did in SF. I find myself less sold on Terence Taylor,for several reasons, but he may turn out well also – he has the frame, and his strength and wrestling background/balance speak well for the eventual change to NT.
Hillis in '09
by Emmett Smith on Mar 8, 2009 3:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would be a great draft, but I agree, Hood likely gone in the 2nd round
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"McDaniels must go!" - Broncoman
by Broncoman on Mar 6, 2009 2:25 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I would love to get Shonn Greene.
My cousins are enormous Hawkeye fans, so I’ve seen my fair share of him. I love his running style.
However, I doubt there’s any way he lasts until the 4th round.
Isn’t he projected to go in the 2nd? We’ll probably miss out on him.
by Shoemaker on Mar 6, 2009 1:32 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Kiper said he'll fall to the third / early fourth
again, I’m being optimisic, but it’s plausible that he could be there in the fourth
by GJcontingent-rAd on Mar 6, 2009 1:34 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Also, I didn't even notice Hypolite on your list.
I’m probably biased since I go to CU, but I think he’d be a great value pickup in the 7th. He’s got the potential to develop into a pretty good D-Lineman.
by Shoemaker on Mar 6, 2009 1:35 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't wait
until the second day to spend 3 late picks on our D-Line. Unless, of course, Rey is gone, when we select Tyson Jackson, in which case we ought to spend a pick on an ILB.
"Battle not with stupid, lest ye become stupid, and if you gaze into the Internet, the Internet gazes also into you" -R. K. Milholland
by jack_ on Mar 6, 2009 1:43 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I hear you man
that’s why trading down is a good idea. But would you not be cool with those 3 players (Rey, Unger, Kruger)?
by GJcontingent-rAd on Mar 6, 2009 2:00 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
We're set on the line.
Why do you want to blow a 3rd rounder on a center?
Average Raider Fan's IQ = 89
Bill Williamson's IQ = 75
Find yours by clicking here.
by kwool79 on Mar 6, 2009 2:37 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Cuz weigmans close to retirement
And you can never have two much depth
bye bye DRE
by robbo650 on Mar 6, 2009 2:45 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
How many O-linemen should we keep on the roster man? We're stacked.
Plus Lichtensteiger can play guard and center. We also have Hamilton who can step in at guard and we also have Polumbus who is a total stud. No way we need to waste an early pick on O-line.
Average Raider Fan's IQ = 89
Bill Williamson's IQ = 75
Find yours by clicking here.
by kwool79 on Mar 6, 2009 3:05 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Because the center is the anchor of your line - a probowl center can go a long way
just ask the Colts’ Jeff Saturday. Rhymed. nice
by GJcontingent-rAd on Mar 6, 2009 4:05 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
O-line that is.
Average Raider Fan's IQ = 89
Bill Williamson's IQ = 75
Find yours by clicking here.
by kwool79 on Mar 6, 2009 2:38 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
5th rd pick
I thought Robiskie was projected waaaaay higher, like 2-3rd round. I know he’s an alternate, I just don’t think he will be available anywhere near the 5th round.
by ohiobronco on Mar 6, 2009 2:52 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
He is...and so is Derrick Williams
if those guys slip to the 5th, I’ll shave my head…
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Mar 6, 2009 3:30 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Fromt he looks of your avatar, looks like you already lost a bet! LOL!
by ohiobronco on Mar 6, 2009 3:35 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice
Victor Frankl:
What man actually needs is not a tensionless state but rather the striving and struggling for some goal worthy of him. What he needs is not the discharge of tension at any cost, but the call of a potential meaning waiting to be fulfilled by him.
Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms – to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.
by wyoeng on Mar 6, 2009 9:47 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
My question I guess would be with selecting Unger (which I definately could see)
Why draft anothre C/G later, why not a CB or S in that slot, just a thought
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"McDaniels must go!" - Broncoman
by Broncoman on Mar 6, 2009 3:38 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
We pick
We are thin at guard and C, VERY thin. I love safeties and corners just as much as you. However, I feel that we need to build a core – front 7 on D / front 5 on O. The more depth / talent we have at those positions, the better we will be.
Ask yourself this:
If Clady or Harris or Kuper or Hamilton or Kasey went down, who’d step in? Lichtensteiger? Polumbus? Not to say those guys won’t be good in the future, just not now.
by GJcontingent-rAd on Mar 6, 2009 4:20 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Polumbus is a stud and could start for us tomorrow if he had to.
Average Raider Fan's IQ = 89
Bill Williamson's IQ = 75
Find yours by clicking here.
by kwool79 on Mar 6, 2009 4:29 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, since we don't usally keep more than eight O-lineman on the roster, may be not worth the pick
If he has no shot at making the team, you figure your starting 5 are set, Polumbus I am guessing makes it and K-lich, so that would leave you room for one more lineman on the roster (probably Unger), just a thought. I agree depth is critical and I really like Unger, that’s my thought in the second round, but I think that if you draft a player in the 5th and you have to put him on the practice squad then it is somewhat of a risk, where you may get a guy at CB or S that can make the team and contributeon ST to start.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"McDaniels must go!" - Broncoman
by Broncoman on Mar 6, 2009 5:19 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
don't forget
McChesney, he’s a guard that the new regime picked up, so he may stick too. Oldenburg (T) was signed Jan 1 apparently, so he must have been an idea of the old regime, but he was a former NE boy so he could conceivably stick. Mitch Erikson and Pat Murray were also late signings last year, both at guard.
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on Mar 6, 2009 6:34 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Good thought Broncoman
Point taken.
by GJcontingent-rAd on Mar 6, 2009 8:36 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
just to let everyone know
If you are interested this is a website mock draft database has like 100 mocks listed
http://www.hailredskins.com/MockDraft.htm
bye bye DRE
by robbo650 on Mar 6, 2009 3:43 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
+1,000,000
…and it’s updated daily with the newer mocks listed first.
by Jezru on Mar 6, 2009 4:08 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Great site, use it often
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"McDaniels must go!" - Broncoman
by Broncoman on Mar 6, 2009 5:20 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice post GJ
I think Denver targets an edge rusher.
McDaniels is going to pass a lot and with this talented offense he will score often, we hope. So by taking a page out of the Colts playbook, get an early lead and add pressure off the edge and make it more difficult for the other to throw and get back in the game. Couple that with pressure also adds turnovers and an edge rusher like Brown, Orakpo or Jackson make more sense to me than Rey Rey…but I would be happy with either really.
"I am not trying to start anything I am just saying that i think if you take Knowshon and draft D later you guys will be hella good next year" ...IamtheGreatest - The smartest Chiefs fan I ever had the priviledge of reading!
"he (Turner) can get perfomance out of a yugo, but that is no reason not to buy a nicer car"....Broncobear
by Steve O' on Mar 6, 2009 4:43 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I dont thinks its smartest to take a C in the 2nd round
possibly later to develop… but we got lickstentigers who could start so I dont think we should spend a 2nd rounder on a C who might not see time in 4+ years. especially when a second rounder could do so much more for the D fence and become an immediate starter.
by RiG on Mar 6, 2009 5:17 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
In defense of Unger
He can play multiple positions on the line which makes him valuable in that he can back-up pretty much every position. I know it’s not the sexy pick, but Unger is a good value there, especially with Weigman on the wrong side of 30 and Hamilton starting to get up there in age.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"McDaniels must go!" - Broncoman
by Broncoman on Mar 6, 2009 5:22 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Lich played like 5 plays last year and gave up 2 of our 11 sacks
He is NOT ready to start. Unger would be a stud / perrenial pro bowler and would anchor our line for years to come. We’d have Unger, Harris, Clady all playing at a pro bowl level – unstoppable.
by GJcontingent-rAd on Mar 6, 2009 8:42 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
ok
cause a guy who has spent a year in our system is going to suck worse than a rookie? I know unger is toted as a star but dude, blocking guys like Jamaal Williams, Shaun Rogers and Albert Haynesworth isnt like blocking guys who barely weigh what those guys thighs weigh. I am a PAC 10 fan but the stregth of the pack ten is speed not bulk!
"We should have kept Seattle and dumped San Diego from the Division"
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
by Jon Tollerud on Mar 7, 2009 12:11 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















