You want Jay Cutler? Some ground rules
The bidding war has begun and we have already seen some rather, well, ridiculous 'offers' come in from fans of other teams that are believed to be interested in Cutler. I thought it necessary to establish some ground rules that, if I were in charge, I would give to other teams so as not to waste each others time. Now, I am going to pretend to be the two-headed monster that is Josh McDaniels and Brian Xanders.
First off, let's get a few things established -
- The Broncos still have the leverage. Jay Cutler is signed for 3 more years and has a cap number of $1.035 million this season. If you don't meet my demands, he's going to remain on the roster. I won't even try and not pay him. It will be worth my money to keep him on the roster. If he decides to report, we'll play him because he should be motivated to perform. After the season, we take a look at the situation again and decide what is best for the Broncos.
- While winning is always the goal, we don't mind the drama because we are trying to change the culture in Denver. We'll be better for it in the long run. Now that Cutler has shown he'll play hardball, we will too. Jay has said he doesn't play for us that he plays for his teammates. If he decides to sit home he will be showing them that was, well, a lie.
Okay, now that we have that out of the way, let's talk. Here are some parameters to start with --
- First, while we would prefer a starting QB back, it isn't a necessity. What will be required is an upper-level starter, preferably on defense, in the League. While we aren't ecstatic about Chris Simms as the answer, it's not like we can take a guy that hasn't started since high school and win 11 games....oh, wait, ummmm, never mind.
- If you are going to include a QB, we have no interest in a player that isn't good enough to start for your team. That means you, Miami, thanks-but-no-thanks, you can keep Chad Henne. Yeah, I know, that may create a bit of a situation with your one starting quarterback if they think you are looking to replace them. Maybe your players aren't as 'sensitive' to such things as Cutler is. Do you really want to find out? Bid high!
- Draft picks, draft picks, draft picks. We have no interest in the #1 pick and the $40 million in guaranteed dollars that comes with it. You can keep that Detroit. For the rest of you, here is a good place to start. A first-rounder in 2009 and 2010, plus a 2nd- and a 4th-rounder. That's if you give us a starting-caliber player in return. What, you think that is a lot? Haven't you listened to the media? Cutler is a Pro Bowler, who threw for 4,500 yards last season. Under .500 as a starter? That's all the defense's fault.
And cut!
Phew, that was fun. All that power. Anyway, that is what the Broncos should be looking for. They need to make this a historic trade. Despite what you are reading, there is no reason for the Broncos not to get it. You'll hear that Cutler's value isn't that high because he is disgruntled. So? His value is extremely high because of age (25), contract($1.035 million in 2009 + 2 more years) and raw talent. Add that to the fact there could be 10 teams in the mix and I say supply and demand, the very principle our economy is built upon, means the Broncos have the ability to ask for, and get, the sky.
Don't underestimate the Cutler Effect in all of this. This whole thing started, allegedly, when the Broncos entertained the prospects of trading Cutler. What would happen in some other city if their team did the same thing? You think Kyle Orton or Sage Rosenfels are simply going to say, "Well, Cutler is better than me so they should try and replace me." Or would those guys accept it and move on? How other QBs handle this will be a good indication of how THEY think Cutler handled it. Stay tuned...
Of course, all that depends on the Broncos actually making the trade. This has been a high-stakes poker game right from the beginning. Could the Broncos once again be calling Cutler's bluff?
The next three weeks or so should tell the tale. Me? I think teams like the Redskins will be much bigger players in all of this than most people think. Daniel Snyder wants to win, isn't afraid to spend big-time cash, and has little regard for draft picks. Think of those types of teams, teams that like to be on the front page, and not just the sports page.
Until then, Broncos fans, all we can do is sit, wait and wonder what the bounty could be.
19 recs |
287 comments
|
Comments
EXCELLENT Write Up, Guru!
Rec’d!
~Davus.X~
Est. 1967
Bleeding Orange and Blue for 42 years
Newest Resident of La-La-Land! Mike Clark for President!
13-3 BABY!
by Davus.X on Apr 1, 2009 11:11 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
and buzzed =)
~Davus.X~
Est. 1967
Bleeding Orange and Blue for 42 years
Newest Resident of La-La-Land! Mike Clark for President!
13-3 BABY!
by Davus.X on Apr 1, 2009 11:11 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Targeting a QB
I think a lot depends on the relative price of the QB’s. Given the choice between a 1st, a 3rd and Jason Campbell or a pair of firsts and Chad Henne, I think the Broncos would take Henne.
I also think Bowlen’s statement removed any leverage based on the idea that they might keep Cutler. I am not saying they won’t do it, but the public perception is such that other teams are probably willing to call that bluff. OTOH, the Broncos did gain some leverage by making the auction public, but that leverage is based on the idea that some other team will get Cutler instead (and not that he will remain a Bronco)
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 11:15 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Leverage is leverage
That some other team might get him is just as effective (if not more so) as the possibility that Denver might keep him.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Apr 1, 2009 12:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I agree with you
Denver still has leverage. If they tell team A that they need to offer two first round picks because that is what teams B and C are offering, team A is going to take that into consideration. But if they tell team A that they need to offer two first round picks or else Denver will keep Cutler, I don’t think team A is going to let that affect their offer.
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 12:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, but we don't have to do that, do we
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Apr 1, 2009 12:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So you want
2 #1’s, two more early picks and a starter? For one guy, a QB that made the PB once? That’s funny. I might consider Cutler for Peppers straight up but not much else.
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com
by Jaxon on Apr 2, 2009 12:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about
Peppers (Pro-Bowler on D) & Delhomme?
by UtesFan89 on Apr 1, 2009 11:17 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
No!
Don’t want Delhomme. And the Panthers don’t have a first this year do they? I think that puts them out of the bidding.
by jaffe28 on Apr 1, 2009 11:34 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We have Josh McCown and Matt Moore if you prefer one of them. :)
According to most sites out there (sure, I guess they don’t focus too much on the Broncos, so they wouldn’t really know) the Panthers are supposedly a wild-card… depending on their willingness to give up Peppers.
by UtesFan89 on Apr 1, 2009 11:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very good writeup. I mostly agree with the following statement:
Of course, all that depends on the Broncos actually making the trade. This has been a high-stakes poker game right from the beginning. Could the Broncos once again be calling Cutler’s bluff?
Growing older is not for sissies. Jack Palance
by bradley on Apr 1, 2009 11:18 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Awesome Guru.
You wrote exactly what I was thinking.
Rec’d and Buzzed. Can’t wait for MHR Radio tonight. It will be another show you just don’t want to miss.
by weazel on Apr 1, 2009 11:20 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
This show will be bananas.
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 11:21 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
MAGIC BANANAS
I seem to have lost my future self.
by papigrande on Apr 1, 2009 12:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well I tend to disagree with the leverage
The problem is that since Bowlen annouced they are trading Cutler, he has lost a lot of leverage since teams can now say, look we know you have no intention of keeping him, we will give you the bare minimum, cause what is the alternative, they keep Cutler on the bench for a season, then McDaniels gets to answer questions every day of why can’t you get Cutler to play for you, why isn’t the best player at that position starting, yada, yada, yada, in addition to splintering the locker room. If Bowlen had not made the annoucement, then teams would have the opinion that only a significant offer would be able to lure Denver into trading Cutler.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun, A-hole" - Ash from Army of Darkness
by Broncoman on Apr 1, 2009 11:21 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
According to Guru
They wouldn’t keep him on the bench, he would play.
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 11:22 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't see him playing
As soon as there is one mistake, the questions will be is Cutler ignoring the coach or is the coach sabotaging the player, McDaniels has too much ego wrapped up in this to let him start.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun, A-hole" - Ash from Army of Darkness
by Broncoman on Apr 1, 2009 11:25 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Definitely agree he wont play if things aren't patched up
It just won’t work if the QB and HC don’t trust each other and the rest of the world knows it. Any sputter on offense will turn into the cicus you mention. And who knows how the rest of the team will react. It could easily split the locker room.
But if Denver did force the issue, I think Cutler would play ball. He would lose to much if he held out.
Denver could sit him for the year, but that is going to decrease his trade value (can you think of any players whose trade value increased after they sat out a year?) Realistically, Cutler’s value will start to decrease after the draft.
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 11:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Michael Vi.... oh nevermind....
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 12:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah...
his value was gone before he sat out the year
by UtesFan89 on Apr 1, 2009 12:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why it can only increase :)
I stand corrected. I meant to say “any player not facing incarceration”.
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 12:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Suuuuure you did lol
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 12:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We do have leverage.
because if somehow Denver doesn’t like what they get in return then there is no way Jay will sit on the bench. He will want to play to make his value go up.
by weazel on Apr 1, 2009 11:24 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why would he care at that point
He would want to play so he could get more value for the team to trade him?, doesn’t make much sense. He could just decide to sit out (He may lose a million dollar) but the Broncos would be forced to trade or cut him.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun, A-hole" - Ash from Army of Darkness
by Broncoman on Apr 1, 2009 11:27 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why
would they be forced to trade or cut him?
Growing older is not for sissies. Jack Palance
by bradley on Apr 1, 2009 11:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well my guess is that if you are in the regular season or even pre-season
and every question is about Jay Cutler that is going to splinter the team, look at what happened in Philly and SF with TO, basically he said he would sit out and just became a major distration so the teams had to get rid of him, and that was a freaking WR, think what the media storm is going to be like if we open training camp and Jay is playing golf at Castle Pines, every player is going to get asked every day, once Simms throws a pick or two in a game, then where is Jay Cutler questions, why did you want Simms over Cutler…
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun, A-hole" - Ash from Army of Darkness
by Broncoman on Apr 1, 2009 11:34 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, from what Guru said above
he may be motivated to play. You never know. I personally don’t think it will come to that point.
by weazel on Apr 1, 2009 11:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Curious about this
why would he be motivated? If he really wants to be traded, I don’t think his value matters to him… he just wants out.
Not disagreeing… just curious.
by UtesFan89 on Apr 1, 2009 11:33 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not his trade value...
the value of his next contract, that, knowing his agent, they will want it to be Ben Roethlisberger-big.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Apr 1, 2009 11:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
How would him staying home....
Look good to other teams thinking of paying him $100 million? Not to mention the year of service he would lose, meaning that he wouldn’t be an unrestricted FA after his contract was up, oh, and the $6 million in incentives that he would be giving up as well…..
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Apr 1, 2009 11:33 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Worked for TO
Talented players can force their way out, other teams aren’t going to care if he stays home, they will see a guy with immense talent that can be a QB for years, he will make back any of the 6 million and more. And he could care less about the FA clause, no way any team would ever let him become a FA, or at worse they franchise him.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun, A-hole" - Ash from Army of Darkness
by Broncoman on Apr 1, 2009 11:37 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Teams will 'deal' with an enigmatic WR
The quarterback, however? If he is a head case then watch out.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Apr 1, 2009 11:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Teams will always role the dice with a QB
Look how many teams took shots with Jeff George and Ryan Leaf, there will always be a team that thinks they can motivate and coach a player.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun, A-hole" - Ash from Army of Darkness
by Broncoman on Apr 1, 2009 11:45 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, look at Jerry Jones.
Well, until he came to his sense with Pacman and TO.
by weazel on Apr 1, 2009 11:46 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why...
we have all the leverage.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Apr 1, 2009 11:47 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well in that circular logic
Again, if teams know the Broncos are desperate to unload Jay, then they really don’t have to give the Broncos the best deal, they can let the Broncos sit and the longer that Jay sits, the lower the value goes, since teams will expect that the Broncos will become more and moer desperate to unload him.
Now the leverage is (like you said) will be the wild card owners (Synder/Jones) that may want to get him now as opposed to playing a game of chicken with the other owners. But that is a big gamble, I just think when you annocunce that you are going to trade a player, that diminshes the trade value the longer that player is on the team.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun, A-hole" - Ash from Army of Darkness
by Broncoman on Apr 1, 2009 11:52 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Desperation
Is Denver more “desperate” to get rid of a talented QB with a low contract number, then some other team that’s “desperate” for a QB like him?
Personally, I think most of the desperation lies with those teams that want Cutler, which is why we’re starting to see a bidding war play out.
Some team WILL overpay for Cutler.
by AllBroncsallday on Apr 1, 2009 11:58 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Bowlen has a plan.
It’s obvious that teams have been calling for a month now. Even if they weren’t picking up the phone, somebody listened to the messages. Bowlen and the Broncos have been assesing the situation and they know what they can get. They probably already had a bunch of teams in mind.
But they knew they had something special in Cutler. They wanted to create tons of demand. So they announced.
Now instead of 4 teams that were desparate enough to call no matter what, they are going to get 10-15 teams thinking they have a shot.
by jwkcsu on Apr 1, 2009 11:59 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think teams will sit and wait
for the remaining three years on his contract to expire. There are too many teams involved and those that want Culter will make sure they get him.
by weazel on Apr 1, 2009 12:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not always.
Look at the Chad Johnson (or whatever he calls himself this week) fiasco in Cincy. Yes, a distraction, but they just let him sulk and he came around
Hillis in '09
by Emmett Smith on Apr 1, 2009 11:57 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
he would care
because the more nice stats he puts up, the more he makes in the future…even Bus Cook must know that.
Have a good time all the time...that's my motto. - Viv Savage
by TD4HOF on Apr 1, 2009 3:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No
We have leverage because he’s under contract for a relatively cheap price- ergo, we really COULD make him eat pine.
by AllBroncsallday on Apr 1, 2009 11:25 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree we could make him eat pine, but that doesn't give us leverage
Other teams will say fine, let him sit on the bench, you can have our offer or you can let him sit on the bench, but I don’t see them getting in a bidding war for him with the knowldge that the longer the Bronocos keep him, the more detrimental it will be for the team.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun, A-hole" - Ash from Army of Darkness
by Broncoman on Apr 1, 2009 11:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Supply and demand is what gives us the leverage....
That and 3 years on the contract. The Broncos don’t HAVE to do something.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Apr 1, 2009 11:34 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree the don't Have to do anything
But like I said earlier, the longer he stays on the roster at this point, the greater a distraction it becomes for the team, think about the coverage we are getting now and we haven’t even come to the draft, think about what happens come regular season and Jay and the team have not come to any agreement. It will make the Philly TO thing look like the morning news.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun, A-hole" - Ash from Army of Darkness
by Broncoman on Apr 1, 2009 11:40 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The environment can have 2 effects...
It can be positive or negative.
Philly was negative.
The Patriots used Spygate as a rallying cry for the season. That would remain to be seen, but I think the Broncos can afford to be stubborn here, there are no expectations in 2009.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Apr 1, 2009 11:43 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Touche`
Very good point around positive and negative effects.
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 12:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
These types of things
are more likely to unite the team, I agree. They drive everyone to singleminded purposefulness in order to ignore outside forces, and their paly derives the benefit.
Amnesty, the idea that you can forgive transgressions against you, gives as much to one side, as it does the other. It has the noble quality of bestowing mercy to both parties.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 1, 2009 2:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
In a bidding war
Somebody will always give too much- we can count on that.
Talented QBs are too much in demand for all 10+ teams to just sit back and wait. Those under pressure to win NOW won’t be willing to risk missing out on what they may see as their only chance to remain unemployed.
Broncos have leverage simply because they own the rights to something that lots of other people want badly. The Broncos can afford to sit back and let the offers roll in, and then use those offers to leverage even better ones.
Cutler won’t come cheaply, count on it.
by AllBroncsallday on Apr 1, 2009 11:45 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
edit
“what they may see as their only chance to remain EMPLOYED”
My Kingdom for an Edit feature!
by AllBroncsallday on Apr 1, 2009 11:47 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was hopeful:
“In a bidding war somebody will always give too much.”
Thanks for that. It rings true.
by NedBronco on Apr 1, 2009 11:50 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right!
Supply and Demand is the key to any market. What is the demand for age 25 QBs coming off 4,500 yards passing and a pro bowl? Pretty High!
Good. What is the supply available on the market for teams that want that. Let’s see….I get one.
I think this is the absolute peak of Jay’s trade value. It will never be higher given his production, age, and contract status. It is a shame that we are (very likely) going to lose him, but we will get maximum value for him. Then it will be very interesting to see what the Broncos do with what they get.
I am a Broncos Fan. I am not a Cutler Fan. I am not a McDaniels Fan. I am a Broncos Fan.
Keep Moving Forward.
by ColoradoOwl on Apr 1, 2009 12:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Someone offers the bare minimum
they’ll lose out to some other team. They know this. Therefore they’ll offer more if they want to get him themselves. If only one team wanted him, however badly, and knew that we were going to trade him come hell or high water, then and only then would our announcing his availability cost us leverage. I swear, you humans are so illogical.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Apr 1, 2009 12:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bowlen....
This whole mess is Bowlens fault to begin with. I don’t blame McDaniels for wanting a player he is comfortable with, I don’t blame Cutler for being upset. I blame Bowlen for not taking control of the organization like he said he would after he fired Shanahan. The day after the Cassel-Cutler trade fell through, Bowlen should have been on every network he could have saying, “Jay Cutler is the starting quarterback of the Denver Broncos. Instead, he is "unavailable to comment” and we don’t hear from him until after the failed March 14th meeting. By then it was too late.
Remember when The Broncos were one of the class organizations in the NFL and Bowlen was a great owner? Well it turns out that Shanahan was responsible for all of that.
Bowlen having a plan…… I doubt it. All of his football intelligence left with Shanahan.
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 4:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bowlen did take control of his organization.
Cutler is gone.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 4:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except.....
when you take control of the organization, you do whats best for the organization.
Otherwise, your GM.
Getting rid of your best player is not whats best for your organization. I don’t care how big of a headcase that player is. Denver could get the Hershal Walker deal coming for cutler and they’ll still never get equal value for him.
The NFL is a buisness, and in buisness, you don’t get rid of your best comodity.
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 4:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So keeping Jay Cutler when he has repeatedly said he doesn’t want to play for the Broncos and wants to be traded is better for the Denver Broncos? I don’t buy it.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 5:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree....
you can’t keep him now. But it should have never gotten to this point. Bowlen screwed up and now Denver is losing a top 10 quarterback for what, other teams retread passers?
However since they have to trade him, they better think about getting a 2010 first round pick. That way they can packet their two first rounders in 2010 to move up in that draft. I would not put my bread in this years quarterback classes basket. Next year, when Bradford and McCoy comes out, thats when you grab a QB.
And who knows, after the 1-15 season the Broncos and us fans are about to endure, Maybe Stoopes will join Bradford on next years roster.
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 5:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts are that Cutler never wanted to be here....
He was a law unto himself here at Denver under Shanny and Bates, where his behavior was acceptable and he could do wrong in their eyes.
Once they left he knew he would have to be a true team mate.
He did not want to be accountable to anyone, or be a member of a team based on a team concept. He wanted to be the star.
Its a shame!
Once again, this is my opinion.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
by boydy2669 on Apr 1, 2009 5:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't agree more
Cutler wanted out the moment Shanny was fired. He & Cook jumped all over teh Cassell talks as their exit strategy and a way to spin it to make McD and the Broncos look like they messed up. Now many fans, led by the MSM believe that McD royally screwed up, when in reality the made a minor misstep, if that. Cutler wanted out before the Cassell talks.
by c_style on Apr 2, 2009 12:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well Said.
This is exactly what I wanted to tell all the folks dropping in.
I agree about the Redskins. They love to fill their trophy case with players. I don’t think that Cutler would do well in that offense tho.
by jwkcsu on Apr 1, 2009 11:22 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I dont think it matters......
Shanahan will be the coach of the Redskins in 2010 if Cutler is there.
So the offense will eventually fit him.
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 4:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
From an outsiders perspective
Two 1’s AND a 2 AND a 4 AND a starter doesn’t seem feasible. I would work on getting two 1’s first…
The Broncos are pretty much screwed in my opinion…there’s no way you can receive appropriate value for a player of Cutler’s caliber.
by Joel Thorman on Apr 1, 2009 11:22 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
If your team won't pay up...
somebody else will. Supply and demand. We still have the benefit of 10 teams seriously considering and 10 more teams window shopping.
by jwkcsu on Apr 1, 2009 11:25 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
But
You’ve got 10 teams who likely all have more GM experience than Brian Xanders so far…
Not to be the antagonistic Chiefs fan, but based on the Jared Allen deal, we’d deal him fast, we’d sell him on talent, and we’d secure a first rounder and pray for a mess of later ones.
The only thing that happens closer to the draft is devaluation and drinking rumors and possibly pissing off other players.
by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Apr 1, 2009 12:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok...
You can keep the 4th rounder…. :)
If we get a starting caliber player back in return, you can keep a pick. If it would just be picks, then that is what it would take.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Apr 1, 2009 11:26 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
In that vein (Redskins) with crazy owners who want to win now
Wouldn’t the theory of a Cowboys trade be pretty plausable with Jerry Jones intentention of getting Cutler and bringing in Mike Shanahan next season to coach.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the one with the gun, A-hole" - Ash from Army of Darkness
by Broncoman on Apr 1, 2009 11:23 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
You tell 'em Guru
There’s another thing that I hope doesn’t occur to other teams (may they not read this blog). I don’t care about the aborted running game or the defense. The main variable on how well Jay performed, in my opinion, is the O-line and the receiver corps, and the first was best in the league (at pass blocking, at the very least) and the second was pretty damned good. If McDaniels was less than over-the-top-he’s-ours-forever committed to Cutler, and willing to at least consider Cassel, it might be because he knows something the rest of the league doesn’t. To wit, how well would a QB with a big arm but a less than stellar ability to cycle through his receivers and recognize danger in a few seconds have done on a team with an ordinary set of receivers and a line that didn’t give him the luxury of scanning the field at his leisure? (After which he still often stayed locked in on his primary receiver and threw into double and triple coverage.) Sure, he looks brilliant blazing a strike into Marshall’s midsection as the backs clustered around him flail at the ball. No doubt a quarterback who instead just drops the ball in to the wide open receiver will be dismissed as just managing the game. I’ll take it. So if Cutler has progressed as far as he can go in that direction, and at this time we don’t know one way of the other, we’ll be getting rid of him at exactly the right time, while other teams still see him as the second coming. It’s conceivable he can only flourish with a brilliant O-line and an outstanding set of receivers, in which case some lucky winner is going to wake up and say, We wuz robbed! Don’t know if it’ll actually happen that way, but life is strange sometimes. Let the fun begin.
P.S. Actually, I think it has occurred to Minnesota, from what I’ve heard of their evaluations of Cutler, but I think we can count on other teams being desperate enough not to want to believe it.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Apr 1, 2009 11:25 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Good points, spock
Hillis in '09
by Emmett Smith on Apr 1, 2009 11:58 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I brought that up too Spock and totally agree...
Anyone…and I mean ANYONE who tells me that our offense was all JC is insane.
You dont hink Brady Quinn would be good behind our O line with our WR’s and Jedi’s scheme????
Kidding me, right?
I am not saying JC was over rated, but he wwas helped by a very good supporting cast….VERY GOOD!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
by boydy2669 on Apr 1, 2009 12:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nail on the head
as usual Spock.
We have a coach with a ‘plug in a late rounder’ reputation. We may not even ask for a top tier QB in return (although it would be nice), and instead draft the 2010 Broncos QB late this year, and give him a year to study. Meanwhile we can try to acquire a top notch, ready to start nose tackle and some (at least one) first rounders.
Maybe there is something to the idea that we just won’t need a Cutler style QB once this team is fully assembled.
I’ll admit that the petty side of me would like to see Cutler getting sacked all game every game behind St. Louis’s O line.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Apr 1, 2009 12:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I worry about McD still grooming QB's
Isn’t he the HC now? From my experience in the professional world, when you move up, you pick up more responsibility and usually delegate some of that to your subordinates. Should McD still be worried about grooming a QB just because he is good at it?
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 12:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If it adds value to the team, why wouldn't he?
Next year is most likely a throw away now, so why not take the time to bring up the next Matt Cassel? Wouldn’t that be of immeasurable value to McD’s team in the future?
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Apr 1, 2009 12:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If it adds value, then yes it's good
but I’m just worried that he may be focusing on the QB position more than needed, whereas he should be focused on the whole team. Then again, as I typed that, I thought about Urban Meyer and how the Special Teams is his baby, his pride and joy. I guess that’s what the QB position is to McD, which I’m fine with. I was just asking other’s opinions.
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 1:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
it can add and subtract value
It can increase the play of the quarterback but would we want that if it takes away from the rest of the team. 1 player versus 52…I know the 1 is the most important player but not more important than the entire rest of the team. If it was more important Cutler would have a fat contract already and we wouldn’t be having this conversation.
Of course i’m still clicking my heels together chanting there’s no place like home, hoping this whole thing is just a dream/nightmare
by trumanj on Apr 1, 2009 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
call me greedy...
but I’d rather bring in the next Tom Brady.
Have a good time all the time...that's my motto. - Viv Savage
by TD4HOF on Apr 1, 2009 3:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That may be the case
or it could be that McD just f’ed up and is now painted into a corner and this is the only way out.
If McD really sees a QB with all the tools JC has, and doesn’t feel he can coach him out of his gunslinger ways or at least calm them down, then we are all screwed. This guy is a 2 year starter (one of which was spent losing 35+ pounds with an undiagnosed but since well publicized medical condition) and has 1 Pro Bowl. If you can’t work with that, you aren’t worth the term “coach”.
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 12:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
awesome post Spock!
singly-handedly cheered me up with that one!
by rwg on Apr 1, 2009 1:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great point, Spock
I, for one, am not convinced that Cutler’s a perennial pro-bowl talent. He’s got mad skills, and some nice intangibles, but I was always bothered by his inability to see the field, some of his decision making, and the petulant quality to his leadership. Now suddenly I find myself, instead of repressing those nagging doubts, watering them and watching them grow….
"You're slow. You're not a running back, and you're not a running back for a reason." ---Shanny to Marcus Thomas...
by Broncs Cheer on Apr 1, 2009 1:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is particualrly bothersome to recognize
that the negatives you just listed have been the same since his senior year at Vandy. He learned Shany’s playbook, but we will never know if he was going to be able to learn to play better as a QB.
Amnesty, the idea that you can forgive transgressions against you, gives as much to one side, as it does the other. It has the noble quality of bestowing mercy to both parties.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 1, 2009 2:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We might find out
once he gets behind a not so sensational O-line and throws to a more ordinary group of receivers. If he breaks out and becomes the next Montana despite that I’ll eat crow, but if he regresses someone else can.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Apr 1, 2009 7:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
the problem is.....
he always seems to have a built in excuse. In 2007, he struggled because of his diabetes. In 2008, he succeeded because of his rock solid O-Line. The excuse for failure in 2009 was already built in because he would be learning a new system and the excuse for success is because of the offensive mind of McDaniels. Now going to another team, the built in excuse for failure is getting acquainted to a new environment and the built in excuse for success is that he was traded to a contender.
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 7:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'll have to share the crow.
Amnesty, the idea that you can forgive transgressions against you, gives as much to one side, as it does the other. It has the noble quality of bestowing mercy to both parties.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 2, 2009 2:04 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good points but....
….. they are dependent on the mind of a 32 year old un-proven, first time coach.
Remember, McDainels started out in New England on the defensive side of the ball. Sure he was the offensive coordinator of one of the most proficent offenses in NFL History, but if you can say that Denvers O-Line and wide-outs helped Cutler as much as Cutler helped them, can’t you say the same for McDaniels? Especially considering that Brady was a three time champion and Moss, Welker, and Stallworth was one of the best receiving combos in history. The pieces were already they, much like they were in Denver, all he had to do was call the plays.
And if I recall correctly, didn’t Denver lead the league is dropped passes? The receivers might have helped make Jay look good, but imagine how good they would have made him look if they hung on to the ball?
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 5:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats a shady stat...
Number of drops does not stand up as Denver threw more than anyone because Bates was clueless and abandoned our run game too early….consistently!
Their % of drops was not that disportionate to the rest of the league.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
by boydy2669 on Apr 1, 2009 5:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
True but.....
dropped passes still stalls drives. And stalled drives puts that hideous defense back on the field to give up more points.
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 5:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sigh. People grasp probability so poorly.
So unless our receivers make an improbably low percentage of errors, or none at all, it’s all their fault for dragging Jay down?
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Apr 1, 2009 7:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
what I was getting at was that if you give credit to the receivers for making Cutler look good, they must also take the blame for leading the league in drops. You can’t give credit without placing blame.
You said one of the reasons you believe that Cutler had such a good year was his telented receivers. I’m only implying that you can’t take the good without the bad.
So to answer your question, if the recievers get all the credit for making him look good, then yes they must take the blame for dragging him down.
I, myself, believe the offense was the product of great quarterback play and outstanding offensive line. I don’t believe the reciever played as big as role as you as I thought they lacked the break away from coverage ability at the end of the season that they had in the beginning.
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 7:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good summary of what we've been saying Guru
We will get a great deal out of this…or play hardball and sit him. The Broncos are going to come out ahead of all this mess one way or another.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Apr 1, 2009 11:28 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Chad Henne IS good enough to start for our team...
That’s why they declared that he will be the starter of the 2010 Season after he learns for one more year under Chad Pennington. There is no QB controversy in South Florida…
by SDefee on Apr 1, 2009 11:34 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Cool...then you are all set...
No need for Cutler. i was just responding to a trade offer from a Dolphins fan…
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Apr 1, 2009 11:37 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh ok...
Not that I wouldn’t enjoy having a guy like Cutler on my team… he’s a great QB… but our QB situation in Miami is stable (finally!)
by SDefee on Apr 1, 2009 11:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea..
I was surprised that a Phin Fan said it…..
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Apr 1, 2009 11:39 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Broncos not stupid
I suspect the FO has something like a draft board prepared for their expectations of expected offers. They have looked at teams, who’s available, and have them listed in terms of priority. Priority of where Coach McDaniels wants to take this team. They are not speculating they are calculating. They have dangled a huge piece of bait and they are waiting to catch the fish they have their sites on. It will be interesting
by gpe999 on Apr 1, 2009 11:36 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Well said, sir
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Apr 1, 2009 11:39 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1
Yup…people don’t give Bowlen and McDaniels enough credit in this situation. You can give them lemons all you want…they will find out the best way to make lemonade out of it.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Apr 1, 2009 12:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, they're real geniuses over there
As they have obviously proven over the past month or so…
by creamy on Apr 1, 2009 11:44 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'm a Ravens fan and as such have no interest in trading for Cutler
But I really don’t see 2 firsts and an authentic defensive starter (let’s say 1st round value) together. 3 1sts just isn’t likely to happen anymore for anyone.
take away a first round pick or the defensive starter, and I think your’e a lot closer to a package we might see happen.
The Rams traded Trent Green and a 5th for a 1st round pick, and teams value their picks even more now. I realize Trent Green was older (30), and not as good, but this would be putting Cutler at over 3 times the value Trent Green had then
by math_geek on Apr 1, 2009 11:38 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Roy Williams was traded for a 1st, 3rd, 6th and 7th
A QB like Cutler should be worth more than a WR like Williams, but the conventional wisdom is also that Dallas overpaid
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 11:42 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dallas gave up a 1st, 3rd, and 6th
and the Lions gave up a 7th… for what it’s worth.
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 12:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dallas did overpay, but even there… let’s just estimate a round N as twice the value of a round N+1. I am saying that Jay Cutler is worth twice what Dallas payed for Roy Williams. What the Guru is suggesting is that it’s closer to three times.
by math_geek on Apr 1, 2009 12:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Denver will be lucky to get twice what Detroit got for Williams
Two first round picks and a player who will contribute is the most that I can hope for (Or a very, very good player plus a first and a mid round pick)
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 12:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What you stated in parenthesis
is actually about what I’m expecting.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Apr 1, 2009 12:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about
Detroit’s #20, #33, and next years 1st round pick (which presumably will be a top 10 pick)? That’s basically 3 1st round picks, and we could use next years pick for a top QB prospect.
by c_style on Apr 1, 2009 4:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
too much for them to cough up.
how about #20, #33, and next years #1 for Cutler and our #48
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 5:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Way to much
For the Lions to give up, Outside of Wideout and Running back, they have no one.
Now the Jets could give up their first rounder this year and next, and this years second.
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 5:49 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand the point
but while Cutler may not be 3x the value of Green then, he’s arguably at the very least twice his value, if not more. We’re talking about a QB with all the tools (who is acting like a tool, but never mind), who is just entering his prime. There is much more of a feeding frenzy for him than there was for Trent Green. So I’d argue he’s worth at least twice what Green was fetching. A 1st, a 2nd and a great player in exchange may be more fair than 2 1sts and a player, though.
by underdog on Apr 1, 2009 12:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a fine opinion
And teams that think like that won’t be bidding on Cutler…no big deal.
I guarantee there will either be a trade with the equivalent of 3 1st round picks or Cutler goes nowhere this year.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Apr 1, 2009 12:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It will be interesting to see who is right, but I’m pretty sure it won’t reach 3 1st round picks or pick caliber players.
by math_geek on Apr 1, 2009 12:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could see
Detroit offering thei #20, #33, and next year’s 1st round pick. That is essentially 3 1st round picks for Cutler.
by c_style on Apr 1, 2009 4:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk
by hibachi on Apr 1, 2009 8:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bidding wars mean someone will overpay
All Detroit has to offer is picks, plus teams don’t seem to value next years picks like they do this years picks. They will still have the #1 pick to draft a LT and they will have significantly upgraded their team. We may have to throw in a pick to sweeten the deal, but seeing Cutler in a Lions jersey is enough to make our FO work something out.
by c_style on Apr 2, 2009 12:40 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see this going all the way to Draft Day....
if nothing else, just to really feel out all the offers on the table.
Peyton Hillis in '09.
Name him---Mr. Balls....or Thunderpussy.
by Joe Medina on Apr 1, 2009 11:39 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
For all of you out there with "Cutler" or "Jay" as part of your name on MHR...email Guru
and he will change it. ;-)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 11:51 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I need to change my avatar AND sig now.... sheesh!
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 12:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is why I don't have player names in my username.
I allready changed my sig. I had to take out Cutler’s comeback counter.
by weazel on Apr 1, 2009 12:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm foolishly holding on until he is donning another jersey
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 12:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like I won't be wearing my Cutler jersey anymore.
by weazel on Apr 1, 2009 12:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm named after my cat
so unless he holds out because I hurt his feelings, which he won’t, because he knows where his food comes from, then I’m all set,
by underdog on Apr 1, 2009 12:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sadly, that's the outlook Jay should have
but in his case food = paycheck… which he uses to pay for food… hmmmmm…
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 12:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....
catfood
Amnesty, the idea that you can forgive transgressions against you, gives as much to one side, as it does the other. It has the noble quality of bestowing mercy to both parties.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 1, 2009 2:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is why I only spend money on past player jerseys.
Elway…TD…ect. ;-)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 12:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Advice
I need a Gradishar!
I am a Broncos Fan. I am not a Cutler Fan. I am not a McDaniels Fan. I am a Broncos Fan.
Keep Moving Forward.
by ColoradoOwl on Apr 1, 2009 12:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I only have one
threadbare TD jersey. It was a gift the Xmas the year before he had the ACL/MCL issue. So yes, I’m to blame for that, but I haven’t worn another one since.
"THIS IS SPARTA!!!" -- papigrande
"The cutsper gives up 100 000 dollars guy, come on custper you should show up and then give the 100 000 dollar to me so I can put down payment on the bronco cheerleader retire home where they can sit and eat all kind of pizza and chip and not have to worry any more about make for little waist in off seasnoal" -- Horvil Tiki
by broncosmontana on Apr 1, 2009 1:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
np Zappa (was JaysGirl)
i went and got a way better nic anyway
And i am totally upset with HIM...omg...i could just slap His face off...i shouldnt feel this way but...wow...like i just feel like i should go get my hair done and put on that special dress and stilleto heels and show Him what Hes gonna miss...cuz Hes never touching this again!!!!!!!!!!
by MHRsGirl on Apr 1, 2009 2:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
ironically, you were the person I thought of when I posted that comment above. :)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 2:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
awwwww...i ruined it
hugs
And i am totally upset with HIM...omg...i could just slap His face off...i shouldnt feel this way but...wow...like i just feel like i should go get my hair done and put on that special dress and stilleto heels and show Him what Hes gonna miss...cuz Hes never touching this again!!!!!!!!!!
by MHRsGirl on Apr 1, 2009 8:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice sig LOL
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 2:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meant for MHRsGirl
I hope that my avatar is a sign of things to come for a verrrrry long time :-)
by ohiobronco on Apr 1, 2009 2:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
your sweet :)
And i am totally upset with HIM...omg...i could just slap His face off...i shouldnt feel this way but...wow...like i just feel like i should go get my hair done and put on that special dress and stilleto heels and show Him what Hes gonna miss...cuz Hes never touching this again!!!!!!!!!!
by MHRsGirl on Apr 1, 2009 8:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh wow
that sig is beyond awesome.
Amnesty, the idea that you can forgive transgressions against you, gives as much to one side, as it does the other. It has the noble quality of bestowing mercy to both parties.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 1, 2009 3:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
that avatar is a little freaky though
not sure what is going on there…. Punishment for Jay perhaps?
Amnesty, the idea that you can forgive transgressions against you, gives as much to one side, as it does the other. It has the noble quality of bestowing mercy to both parties.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 1, 2009 3:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
omg...thanks
And i am totally upset with HIM...omg...i could just slap His face off...i shouldnt feel this way but...wow...like i just feel like i should go get my hair done and put on that special dress and stilleto heels and show Him what Hes gonna miss...cuz Hes never touching this again!!!!!!!!!!
by MHRsGirl on Apr 1, 2009 8:35 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome MHRsGirl.....well you know what I mean. Awesome new name.
MHR signup fee: FREE
Change username: FREE
A sig that makes my ROFL: PRICELESS
by weazel on Apr 1, 2009 3:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to totally agree weazel, by the way what will we do with our jc- saves t-shirts haha
Real Power, comes with the realization that One cannot change the Moment;
only ones perception of it: Atitude! JQM
by UB3 on Apr 1, 2009 5:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Minnesota
fan quote here:
Look, I get it—Jay Cutler is a good quarterback. He’s undoubtedly more talented than the Vikings’ current dynamic duo behind center. But I refuse to waste any more time talking about him because:
1. The Vikings have nothing to offer that would entice the Broncos to trade him to Minnesota, especially compared to the plethora of other teams that are reportedly interested in him.
2. It’s becoming blatantly obvious that the guy is a solid mixture of a giant douche and a turd sandwich. It’s OK to be a little miffed that your new coach was looking to trade you, but to burn his calls like a scorned junior high girlfriend is a bit much. I remember almost everyone on this site shunning the possibility of getting another me-first prima donna a few weeks ago—why is this one so different?
do we count Minn out?
http://www.davusx.net/assets/db/la_la_land.gif
"We should have kept Seattle and dumped San Diego from the Division"
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
by Jon Tollerud on Apr 1, 2009 11:58 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Adrian Peterson would spark our interest
"Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence."
Vince Lombardi
by Denver_Native on Apr 1, 2009 12:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
cutler for adrian and u got a deal
[IMG]http://i329.photobucket.com/albums/l398/RedFalcon_album/Denver%20Broncos/BRONCOS2.gif[/IMG]
by scheffy88beast15 on Apr 1, 2009 12:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
sure
and Hillis can be the QB!
http://www.davusx.net/assets/db/la_la_land.gif
"We should have kept Seattle and dumped San Diego from the Division"
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
by Jon Tollerud on Apr 1, 2009 9:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
lmao JT
"THIS IS SPARTA!!!" -- papigrande
"The cutsper gives up 100 000 dollars guy, come on custper you should show up and then give the 100 000 dollar to me so I can put down payment on the bronco cheerleader retire home where they can sit and eat all kind of pizza and chip and not have to worry any more about make for little waist in off seasnoal" -- Horvil Tiki
by broncosmontana on Apr 1, 2009 1:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Note from a Lions fan
Great write-up, TSG. I really don’t think you’ll get as much as you seem to think, but I have no doubt that somebody (like the Redskins) will pay through the nose for him.
As far as my team is concerned, I think a lot of people are sold on him, but not me. The way I see it, he has acted like a complete prima donna throughout this whole thing, stamping his feet and crying like a five-year-old who doesn’t get his way. As you posted in this comments section, teams are willing to deal with an “enigmatic” WR (or other skill position), but when a QB acts like a jilted girlfriend, teams should beware.
Also, you’re dead on in saying that he’s making himself look like a liar in this instance. If he refuses to play for the teammates he’s professed to be playing for, what good is his word? Who wants a me-firster leading the team?
Of course, all of this isn’t to say I think Mayhew won’t go after him, I just think he’s not worth the price.
by AZ Yooper on Apr 1, 2009 12:10 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
The point is...someone WILL pay through the nose...
The Lions have two first rounders…so dont count them out! The Broncos don’t have to trade him if the right offer doesn’t come along…he will only cost us $1 million to keep him…..someone will pay through the nose for him.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 12:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remember the Ricky Williams deal
anything is possible for someone considered “franchise”.
"THIS IS SPARTA!!!" -- papigrande
"The cutsper gives up 100 000 dollars guy, come on custper you should show up and then give the 100 000 dollar to me so I can put down payment on the bronco cheerleader retire home where they can sit and eat all kind of pizza and chip and not have to worry any more about make for little waist in off seasnoal" -- Horvil Tiki
by broncosmontana on Apr 1, 2009 1:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The silver lining to all this
I am really enjoying the kosher Coke I just picked up. Now I have to figure out how long it’ll last in my pantry before I go stock up on more.
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 12:15 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
huh??
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Apr 1, 2009 12:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uses sugar not high fructose corn syrup
The way it used to be made (and still is in some parts of the world).
Corn is not kosher for passover so Coke manufactures the sugar version every year for a few weeks.
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 12:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hear you can still get sugar coke in Mexican Markets
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Apr 1, 2009 1:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but for the most part it is harder to find and more expensive
I was looking online a few months ago and saw places selling it for something like $10 a six pack plus shipping. Given that I easily go through a six pack a day, I decided I should probably wait until now and load up on it at the normal price.
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can buy old fashioned Dr Pepper
With the real sugar, exactly how they first made it, from the original Dr Pepper factory in Texas. I’ve never had Coke with real sugar, but you can definitely taste the difference in the “real” Dr Pepper.
by c_style on Apr 2, 2009 12:48 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
When i was in Fiji
I was struck by two eating habits of the locals. The first was that they buy fresh bread by the slice. They don’t even put anything on it, they just go in and the store (if you can call it that) has an atmosphere like a baskinrobbins or something, and they get a slice of bread. Simple, but if you are in the habit of making your own bread, I think you can appreciate teh draw, especially since the hovel it was coming from could lure you from 3 miles away with the smell…
The other thing that struck me was that the natives don’t hardly drink any water at all (funny when you figure that the Fiji bottled water is the more expensive stuff you can buy). Instead they drink Coke. I have a soda maybe once a year, but I wanted one of the glass bottles they were selling it in, to make a Fiji memento out of so I bought it, and was shocked by the taste… Nothing like I remembered Coke tasting, but who knows, right? So I bought 5 more, and ended up going home with two, which I gave to a friend who was a cokeaphiliac, and he knew right away that it was the real thing, made according to the old recipe (no cocaine though).
To get the thread back on topic (sort of), there was a freaking Broncos fan over there. He drove this beat up old taxi and bombed around the dirt roads all over vanua levu. I got a ride from him once to go see the other side of the island, and ended up giving him my broncos hat. Broncos world widebaby.
Amnesty, the idea that you can forgive transgressions against you, gives as much to one side, as it does the other. It has the noble quality of bestowing mercy to both parties.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 1, 2009 3:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I fear it' a wrap for the Broncos :/
The best hope was building around Cutler…now everything is ashes…(sigh)
by FrankPitts on Apr 1, 2009 12:19 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually
the entire team is already better now than it was last year — except for Cutler. Which as I’ve said is a huge hole to fill. But it’s a bit overdramatic to say the whole team is ashes. The defense is already improved and we haven’t even had the draft yet. The offense has a ton of talent even separate from Cutler. So while losing Cutler is a big hole to fill, it’s not exactly a bar cupboard.
by underdog on Apr 1, 2009 12:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nuts.... Nuts
And more nuts….
An average QB at best worth 2 first rounders, a 2nd rounder and a 4th round pick PLUS a starter on defense?
Being a little blinded by the homerism right? Name one other player in the league worth that much. none.
by whodeyfans on Apr 1, 2009 12:30 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
You will see.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 12:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
what will I see?
A bunch of Denver fans getting behind Brady Quinn and Shaun Rogers and a 4th rounder. Probably.
by whodeyfans on Apr 1, 2009 12:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Add an early pick, and I'd take that
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Apr 1, 2009 12:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Said the poster evaluating Cutler as Average at Best
We’re not talking about Tyler Thigpen here.
And I am not saying that is what will be offered, just that that is what I would find acceptable.
I actually like the far fetched idea of making him ride pine.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Apr 1, 2009 12:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree on that
Pull a Keyshawn, give him his million and make him sit. Maybe then he would fire his agent.
by whodeyfans on Apr 1, 2009 12:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I sense a disliking of Bronconess from you...
Don’t hate.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 1:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't hate...
I am indifferent. I just think everyone is asking a bit much for a still unproven QB.
by whodeyfans on Apr 1, 2009 2:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not if the picks are conditional
and that’s at the low end of what’s possible given the feeding frenzy we’re expecting to see.
I don’t disagree with you, but with so many suitors, odds are someone will pay based on gut instinct and perceived potential, not straight value.
"THIS IS SPARTA!!!" -- papigrande
"The cutsper gives up 100 000 dollars guy, come on custper you should show up and then give the 100 000 dollar to me so I can put down payment on the bronco cheerleader retire home where they can sit and eat all kind of pizza and chip and not have to worry any more about make for little waist in off seasnoal" -- Horvil Tiki
by broncosmontana on Apr 1, 2009 2:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brady Quinn is still unproven.
what about Cutler is unproven? He has 9 4th quarter comebacks out of 17 wins. Sure he is 17-20 as a starter, but he had the worst defense ever backing him up. He threw for 4500 yards and 25 TDs last year. He is unproven as far as winning playoffs games or Super Bowls, but even Eli Manning didn’t win a playoff game until his 4th season….Elway didn’t win one until his 4th year either.
Cutler is more proven than any 3 year QB in the league.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 2:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is a perverse pleasure in the thought of forcing him to ride pine. : )
"THIS IS SPARTA!!!" -- papigrande
"The cutsper gives up 100 000 dollars guy, come on custper you should show up and then give the 100 000 dollar to me so I can put down payment on the bronco cheerleader retire home where they can sit and eat all kind of pizza and chip and not have to worry any more about make for little waist in off seasnoal" -- Horvil Tiki
by broncosmontana on Apr 1, 2009 1:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the line about Matt Cassel...
very true. I am not worried about us with Chris Simms and while I would rather have a starting QB I could work with Simms. Oh and one more thing, watch out for Matt Hasselbeck as a dark horse. A trade for him and their first overall pick this year would be well worth Jay Cutler assuming that Hasselbeck has two years left in him.
"Hey Raiders fans!!! If you leave now you can beat traffic!"
-Rod Smith
by GarretBarnes on Apr 1, 2009 12:35 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
wait..
*1st round pick lol sorry.
"Hey Raiders fans!!! If you leave now you can beat traffic!"
-Rod Smith
by GarretBarnes on Apr 1, 2009 12:35 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Work with Simms?
All Denver had last year was an offense, so you are OK degrading that offense? So you play with a worse QB and still a bad D?
Not good.
by whodeyfans on Apr 1, 2009 12:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wont be a bad defense, and the O has everyone remaining....so I am not seeing your aragument!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
by boydy2669 on Apr 1, 2009 12:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Read the Blog
Brandon Marshall will be gone half the season, QB won’t be there so your two best offensive players are gone. The D was terrible this year, what makes them better? Wishes and dreams?
by whodeyfans on Apr 1, 2009 12:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You wishing an dreaming that the Denver D won't be better than last year's mess doesn't make it true either
They may not be the best D in the league next year, but the changes they have made in the secondary instantly upgraded the team.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Apr 1, 2009 12:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah signing 8 safeties
helps stopping the run a lot.
by whodeyfans on Apr 1, 2009 1:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
1-10 defense
1 dline 10 Db’s
you can’t stop the run but nobody will be passing on you
by tdfrazi on Apr 1, 2009 1:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh man am I an idiot!
Safeties don’t have anything to do with run defense do they.
All of Denver’s Defense problems were stopping the run last year, they were definitely able to contain passing plays.
I think I see where you are going with this though. Of course the front line will need to be addressed further, but to expect them to make no improvement even with Brian Dawkins stepping on the field is pretty foolish.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Apr 1, 2009 1:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What I wanna know is:
What are we supposed to do with all these ‘JC Saves’ T-Shirts??
My first thought is to use it as toilet paper and fedex it to JC himself.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Apr 1, 2009 12:51 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
What about...
Cutler to Tenn for VY +draft picks? Your thoughts?
by TX HOCKEY! on Apr 1, 2009 12:57 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Puke
VY cannot throw the football (at all) and since Shanny left town, we will not be running the bootleg, so he’s pretty much worthless. the guy wanted to quit footbnall midway thorough his rookie year. makes no sense . . . wait a minute! That means they will do it!!
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 1:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
"quit football" I meant
typing is hard apparently.
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 1:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're kidding, right?
Why would we want VY?
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Apr 1, 2009 1:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No Thank You
Personally, I would not be in favor of getting Young. Also, I do not see Young as fitting the McDaniels offense.
I am a Broncos Fan. I am not a Cutler Fan. I am not a McDaniels Fan. I am a Broncos Fan.
Keep Moving Forward.
by ColoradoOwl on Apr 1, 2009 1:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Head case for a head case?
I see your logic, but Cutler can actually play. ; )
"THIS IS SPARTA!!!" -- papigrande
"The cutsper gives up 100 000 dollars guy, come on custper you should show up and then give the 100 000 dollar to me so I can put down payment on the bronco cheerleader retire home where they can sit and eat all kind of pizza and chip and not have to worry any more about make for little waist in off seasnoal" -- Horvil Tiki
by broncosmontana on Apr 1, 2009 1:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jay the Jag
David Garrard, John Henderson, Swapping of first round picks, and a third round pick. with conditional day one pick next year
by tdfrazi on Apr 1, 2009 1:03 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
That's a thought
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Apr 1, 2009 1:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Cutler is really worth that much...
Why are they trading him? I understand that he’s been a pre-madonna, but many players are. It seems that the administration has blown it here. Their job is to put the team first and work with the players. They have expected Cutler to act like a front-office member… that’s not going to happen. Many players in this league are arrogant. If McDaniel cannot deal with players, than he’s clearly not cut-out for coaching. Anyway, my main points are as follows:
1. If Cutler is the problem and this madness is his doing, then what team would pay that ridiculous asking price? Cutler now has red-flags all over him. Don’t take me wrong. Teams will still want him, but they aren’t going to want to bet the farm on him. I just read that the Vikings and the Panthers took Cutler off their list because of his attitude problems.
2. If the administration is the problem, then why are you trading Cutler? You should keep Cutler and fire McDaniel. Getting rid of Cutler wouldn’t solve anything. In fact, it would just set the franchise back further.
3. If it was both, than you have a real problem. McDaniel would need to be fired, and Cutler would still need to be simmered down or traded.
In short… if Cutler really is a cancer, who is going to pay through the nose to get him?
by BAL_Hawk on Apr 1, 2009 1:13 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
About 8 teams
who are desperate to win.
"THIS IS SPARTA!!!" -- papigrande
"The cutsper gives up 100 000 dollars guy, come on custper you should show up and then give the 100 000 dollar to me so I can put down payment on the bronco cheerleader retire home where they can sit and eat all kind of pizza and chip and not have to worry any more about make for little waist in off seasnoal" -- Horvil Tiki
by broncosmontana on Apr 1, 2009 1:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
…that there will be teams desperate for a quarterback (and wins), but I just don’t see anyone paying two first-round picks, a second-round pick, a fourth-round pick and a starting caliber player. That’s a ridiculous cost! It won’t happen now that Cutler has sullied his reputation around the league.
However, I do agree that Cutler’s value to Denver is AT LEAST that much. That’s why they should keep him… if they can. He’s worth much more to them than they could possible ever get in return.
by BAL_Hawk on Apr 1, 2009 1:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
BINGO!!!!
We have a clear headed winner!
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 1:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're right on the money BAL-hawk
and I choose #2.
There are lots of former OC with no HC experience.
There are very few 25 year old Pro Bowl QBs.
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
And there are very few experienced HCs
that would allow their star QB to dictate their personnel moves.
"THIS IS SPARTA!!!" -- papigrande
"The cutsper gives up 100 000 dollars guy, come on custper you should show up and then give the 100 000 dollar to me so I can put down payment on the bronco cheerleader retire home where they can sit and eat all kind of pizza and chip and not have to worry any more about make for little waist in off seasnoal" -- Horvil Tiki
by broncosmontana on Apr 1, 2009 1:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
How many experienced HC
Make it their first act to get into a slap-fight with the most talented player on the team?
My point is that JC has much more value than McD, just based on laws of scaresity.
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 1:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're judging McD's value as a HC
Before any of us have seen him coach a game as a HC. How can you make that claim? Nobody knows his value as a HC. How scarce are elite HC’s? I’m not claiming he will be the next amazing HC, but you are implying that he won’t be. Bottom line is when you hire a new HC, the players need to get on board, circle the wagons, buy into the system, and come out with all they have. If your crybaby QB wants to jump ship before they have played a single game you don’t just fire your brand new HC. How far would that set us back? What if B Dawkins now wants to jump ship? What if JC doesn’t want to play for whoever you replace him with? If your going to do that why not just let Cutler run the whole damn show? You can’t go down that road at all. People need to know their place. JC doesn’t call the shots, period. Bowlen owns the team and if he wants to replace his HC that’s his prerogative. If the FO wants to discuss possible trades that’s their prerogative. It is not the QB’s prerogative to cry about those moves and demand a trade. I hope we do bench his ass all year just to put him in his place. Make him walk through our tunnel each and every week with the fans giving him what he deserves for turning his back on all of us. Either that or he will hold out and he will have to pay Bowlen for all of the fines he can assess. Or send him to the Lions, I’m cool with that too.
by c_style on Apr 2, 2009 1:10 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
HC value issues
But that’s my point: we have absolutely NO IDEA what knid of coach McD will be. None. I admit I am personally skeptical given that every other branch of the Bilicheck coaching treat has been an absolute disaster and the fact that his handling of the JC situation has been ham-handed; however, there is just no way to know. He may be great and win multiple championships, etc. but percentage wise, if you look at the track record of new coaching hires in the NFL, the VAST MAJORITY do not work out, meaning they eventually GET FIRED due to lack of production (read: not enough wins). I don’t need to remind you that Bilicheck himself got fired in Cle. Before stumbling into Brady in NE.
Now look at JC. Drafting a QB is always a crapshoot with a high bust potential. If you told us when we drafted him that after three years (2.5 as a starter), he would have made the progress he’s made I think we would have thrown a freaking party!
Fast forward to today. We have a QB that can play, end of story. Is he perfect? No, but he can win games for you and he scares that crap out of the opposing defense AND he’s only 25 with no ceiling in sight. JC has produced at the NFL level, and he is clearly the best talent on the offensive side of the ball AT THE MOST IMPORTANT POSITION ON THE TEAM. We also have a coach that is a complete freaking question mark.
At the end of the day, we end up with the crapshoot coach rather than the Pro Bowl QB.
As a Bronco fan, how does that not make you want to puke?
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 2, 2009 7:14 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with your point that
we know what we have (had) with Cutler while McD is a big question mark. I also am sick that it came to this and that Cutler won’t be a Bronco any longer.
My reply however was directed at your opinion (which I’ve heard several others echo) that Bowlen should have fired McD to keep Cutler once we stumbled into this ordeal. There is just no way Bowlen could have gone that route. That is not a way to run your franchise. You cannot let any player dictate how you as an owner run your business. Bowlen played his hand correctly. Cutler, IMO, was out of line from the beginning. If he doesn’t want to be here, sayonara. You just can’t fire your new HC b/c you QB gets all butt hurt over your decision to go that route. The QB is not bigger than the team and he is definately not bigger than the franchise.
by c_style on Apr 2, 2009 3:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So we all need to ask outselves
what happens is they end up getting a first round pick plus some front seven player that is ok but bit on the caliber of Peppers, Rogers, etc? Then how does everyone feel about what transpired? Will JC still be blamed for screwing us, or will the wrath start to focus more on the front office for this whole travesty?
Given where we are now (past the Rubicon, it would seem) the best I can hope for is a Hershel Walker type haul; however, I fear we’re kidding ourselves. A lot of teams are interested sure, but it really isn’t realistic (IMO) to think about sitting him. It would poison the whole team and sides would be taken, lines would be drawn.
So I ask the question: What is the bare minimum that each of you, as Bronco Fans, would be OK in receiving for JC and who will you blame if we don’t get it??
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 1:14 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
The Broncos better get......
…..no less than three players. (current starters or draft picks) and baring whether or not they get Quinn in the deal, they better go out and pick up Garcia.
And if they don’t get this I blame Bowlen. Who all of a sudden doesn’t look like that great of an owner without Shanahan.
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 6:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah nah
He’s been a great owner. He’s left the guys he hired to do what they do.
He’s sided with his upper managemnet, hasn’t undermined them. And when the time finally came to intervene, he attempted to with no result. He then acted decisively.
Good owner. Have a cookie…
"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space."
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes" Douglas Adams
by orange&blue_aussie on Apr 2, 2009 1:53 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's Make a Deal
To Den: Brady Quinn, 2nd Rd Pick Cleveland
To Det: Cutler
To Cle: 1 of det’s 1st rounders, + 1 of the 3rd rounders
by hallandnash on Apr 1, 2009 1:15 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately
That’s about what I’m expecting.
And no, I do NOT veiw that as a net gain.
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 1:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
disgusting.
That would be the trade I would expect if Denver is actually desperate to get rid of Cutler…but how does it hurt Denver worse to keep Cutler on the roster and tell him to just stay home and collect a check? Ouch $1million?? lol
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 1:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deal #2
I posted something like this at the outset of McJayGate…
Denver gets QB Quinn, DT Rogers and 2009 Draft pick # 5 (1st)
Cleveland Gets QB Cutler and 2009 Draft pick # 79 (3rd)
by topnation on Apr 1, 2009 1:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a realistic deal.
Cutler is worth MUCH more to the Broncos, but unfortunately, this circus has seriously hurt his reputation.
by BAL_Hawk on Apr 1, 2009 1:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
A Patriots Perspective
I’m a Patriots fan, so as you might guess I have some recent experience trying to gauge the value of a young, succesful and somewhat NFL-experienced quarterback. And I just don’t see you getting as much for Cutler as you want.
Let me first make a few points clear: I believe Cutler is more valuable than Cassel, with more experience and a higher ceiling. He will also automatically be valued higher, because he was originally a 1st round pick. + the Broncos obviously have much more leverage, since the Patriots were pretty much forced capwise to get rid of Cassel in a hurry.
Still, I was schocked just how little interest there was in Cassel. Even if you attribute his wins to the receivers and the system – it sure wasn’t the defense – how could he only draw interest from 1½ team? (The Broncos being half the team.) I mean, at least Cassell has shown he can win in A NFL-system, and still the 49’ers were apparantly perfectly happy to go to war with Shaun Hill or Alex Smith who have haven’t won in ANY NFL-system or perhaps Mark Sanchez who has never taken a snap in the NFL. (Or think of Tampa Bay or Detroit, both certified qb-wastelands, who wasn’t even willing to give up their 1st-round pick for Cassel.)
As I said, I expect a higher price for Cutler, but it seems as if – once the off-season begins – everybody expect their young qb will “take the next step” next year, so they won’t have to pony up for the proven thing.
by hythlodaeus on Apr 1, 2009 1:27 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
The rest of the league doesn't want to pay $14 million for a one year wonder in Cassel.
Cutler will cost $1 million this year and is a proven multi year starter. He also has 9 4th quarter heroics out of 17 total wins. Not bad. I think the rest of the nation outside of Denver is underestimating just how much of a demand there will be for Cutler. We will get a fantastic deal or we will keep Cutler on our roster…he is under contract.
Bowlen said the Broncos will try to trade Cutler…which means Cutler is as good as done as a Bronco, but he didn’t say WILL TRADE, he said TRY to TRADE. Which means, you better come with your best offer…or don’t bother.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 1:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Keeping Cutler...
…would destroy the Bronco’s 2009 season and ultimately, be suicide for McDaniel’s young career.
by BAL_Hawk on Apr 1, 2009 1:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why?
Cutler could sit on the bench or just sit at home….screw him. Make him realize that playing in the NFL is a privilege not a right.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 1:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Without Cutler...
…the Broncos would be a significantly worse team. They would need some type of compensation in order to stay at the same level of competition. Sitting him on the bench is essentially like trading him away for free, at least for the 2009 season (which is all I was referring too).
by BAL_Hawk on Apr 1, 2009 1:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, we will find out if you are right...
How much worse off could we be with a very talented QB who doesn’t want to play for us than with a less talented one who does?
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 1:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My mistake:
We will begin discussions with other teams in an effort to accommodate his request to be traded.
That statement is effectively the same thing as saying, “We will try to trade him”. In my eyes anyway.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 1:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You might be right
I was just trying to pass along my experience. I understand why teams were reluctant to go after a one-year wonder, but with at least ten teams going in to next season with no-year wonders at the helm, I still found the lack of interest puzzling.
by hythlodaeus on Apr 1, 2009 1:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
$14 million a year is quite a steep price with such uncertainty in the economy...even for NFL franchises.
plus the lack of a resume since high school. lol
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 1:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s not really that puzzling when you consider a few things.
1) He’s only done it for 1 year
2) He did it with a coach that is no longer going to coach him.
3) $14 million is big cap hit
4) If he’s somewhat successful, he’ll be looking for the same money next year and term
In this regard, I’m hoping McDaniels turns out to be a young Shanahan and can turn a good QB into a star.
by hallandnash on Apr 1, 2009 1:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stat that Porkchop likes to throw around
Cutler is 13-1 when the opponent is held to 21 points or less. That’s a pretty strong argument that Cutler can win with a decent defense.
by CoastalBronco on Apr 1, 2009 2:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Am I the only one not overly impressed with that stat?
Aren’t you supposed to win when your defense doesn’t give up a lot of points. Allowing an average of 21 points per game would put you in the top half of the league last year. Add to the fact that a couple of those wins were 16-13 and 15-14 (the famous Buffalo “Toro” game)…not exactly offensive clinics.
Have a good time all the time...that's my motto. - Viv Savage
by TD4HOF on Apr 1, 2009 4:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
the antithesis of that stat
which slowWG brings up often, is how often we won by the slimmest of margins and lost by the being blown out. Not all wins and losses carry the same weight in evaluating the personnel.
Amnesty, the idea that you can forgive transgressions against you, gives as much to one side, as it does the other. It has the noble quality of bestowing mercy to both parties.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 1, 2009 5:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
hadn't thought of it that way
you’re right… it would be much more impressive if Jay had a good record when the defense wasn’t playing well.
That’s what I get for reading Porkchop.
by CoastalBronco on Apr 1, 2009 5:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah....I agree...
Has anyone done the stats for other players in the NFL with that.
It could be a great stat…but I dont know.
It is like saying you are the winningest QB with the temperature under 50 degrees.
Has anyone done those stats or knows where to get them?
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
by boydy2669 on Apr 1, 2009 5:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
As I said, I expect a higher price for Cutler, but it seems as if – once the off-season begins – everybody expect their young qb will "take the next step" next year, so they won’t have to pony up for the proven thing.
Well said, and this concerns me, as I still need to be convinced that our Bronco FO will react logically to this theoretical trade environment. I fear that we will get royally shafted in the Cutler trade unless someone really does pony up in a big way right out of the gate. Assuming that logical heads prevail, even in Washington…. Cutler starts losing appeal and trade value. Do we panic and unload him before he drops even further, or do we sit pat and wait till the end of the 2009/2010 season when some teams will have to deal with the fact that their budget QB or draft special did not and shows no potential to ever pan out? At that point Cutler (who has ridden the pine for a season, seen what he opted out of with McD, and and REALLY thinks that playing would be more fun than more pouting and bench-warming) would start to look like someone worth what he is theoretically worth this year.
I would take the second option, but I am not currently encumbered with a 32-year-old’s inflated ego, nor am I worried that my ego is about to cost my team major money and progress unless I act right now.
I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok.
Shaquille O'Neal
by tannji on Apr 1, 2009 4:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
above reply was to hythlodaeus, btw
I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok.
Shaquille O'Neal
by tannji on Apr 1, 2009 4:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like you said
Cassel didn’t draw much interest (even though he should have) whereas Cutler has drawn a lot of interest (whether or not he should). So obviously the two cases aren’t directly comparable.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Apr 1, 2009 7:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Guru, nice 'right up'.....
I enjoyed your thoughts.
Would like to add on the ‘Jay’ subject. ‘I was in the kid’s immature corner, thinking he’d grow up’, until he became bigger than the owner ; not returning the calls. I feel sadly football is as much business as a sport now-a-days, and nice guys finish last. I don’t know that obtaining a first draft thru a trade can’t include some salary consideration as well from the trading team ? However, with that in mind, a stint in Detroit may be the thing ‘Jay’ needs….if he survives.
I got a laugh with your choice of words ‘historic trade’. It reminded me of “THE TRADE” ; five players, six draft picks. Now, that’s a trade…..
by rockymtnfan on Apr 1, 2009 1:41 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
How about this trade
Cleveland Gets Cutler, 12, and Marshall
Broncos get Quinn, Edwards, 5th, and possibly a 4th
or just Quinn and 5 for Cutler and 12
Both recievers in the first trade seem to get fans mad one with the police and one with unwillingness to stay/drops but both have undeniable talent
by cgerycz on Apr 1, 2009 1:45 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Not enough for us...
Cutler has 2.5 years of NFL starts and a Pro Bowl. Quinn has 3 games started.
by topnation on Apr 1, 2009 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rogers is more important to us than Quinn
Supposedly McD can win with a career backup at QB.
by CoastalBronco on Apr 1, 2009 2:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why would Denver......
switch quarterbacks just to move up 7 spaces in the draft? Thats a horrible offer.
Rogers is a malcontent. He’ll want out of Denver in a year just like he wanted out of Detroit and cleveland.
McD didn’t win with a career backup, Belicheck did. Don’t ignore the fact that Belicheck has done just fine without his assistants while his assistants have failed misserably without Bill.
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 6:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post.
Broncos should not let a player dictate to the team. If you have to sit him and play someone like Simms, I say why not? Simms could be a pleasant surprise in the new offense. Of course you would have to get another QB, but so what? The Broncos don’t have to execute a knee-jerk reaction just because Jay says he doesn’t want to be here anymore. There are other quality QBs available next year, plus some better D-linemen. Patience is our luxury; Jay’s under contract.
"Be not like dumb-driven cattle...."
by jcps on Apr 1, 2009 1:45 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
At the end of the day
Best case I think we will get 1, maybe 2 high draft picks (1st or 2nd), plus maybe a Brady Quinn-type player.
We will lose our 25 year old Pro Bowl QB. And we will keep a rookie HC with zero experience who, statistics show, will probably not take us to the Promised Land.
Basically, we’re going to get screwed no matter how this shakes out.
Sorry to be so gloomy, but this “pie in the sky” stuff about the huge haul we’re going to get seems pretty ridiculous given the present realities facing us IMO.
Sorry to be so gloomy, but this “pie in the sky” stuff about the huge haul we’re going to get seems pretty ridiculous given the present realities facing us IMO.
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 1:49 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
It's better to be realistic.
They can only do what’s best with what’s right in front of them. The past is the past… move on. Maybe, if nothing else, McDaniel has learned a valuable lesson.
by BAL_Hawk on Apr 1, 2009 1:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Would you rather keep a disgruntled 25 year old pro bowler who hates his owner and his coach and the Denver Broncos in general?
I will never forgive Jay Cutler for WASTING OUR TIME. My time is as valuable as his and he has effectively wasted 2 and a half years of my life that I will never get back. We should have kept Jake Plummer.
LetPlummerPlay…come back and say, “I told you so!”
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 1:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that he wants to keep Cutler.
He’s just lamenting the situation. As we have already stated… it’s not pretty.
by BAL_Hawk on Apr 1, 2009 1:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes I do.
Are you kidding?
He’s a 25 year old Pro Bowl QB!! We’ve been waiting 10 flipping years for this! Good God, before JC, Plummer (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) was BY FAR our best QB since #7 and now we’re pissing that away because some 32 year old with a Hoddie fetish wants to prove he has a big set of nuts?
THIS MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE!!!
McD f’ed this situation up. he has no intrinsic value (unlike Cutler).
Fire HIM and move on.
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 2:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If that were true, Bowlen would have fired McD...
the truth is that the mainstream media is making McD look like the bad guy, because the media is in love with Cutler. Pat Bowlen is not a fool and he choose Elway over Reeves in the 90’s because Reeves was in the wrong for firing certain staff and treating Elway harshly. Same situation. Cutler is being fired because he is trying certain staff unfairly and lying to the media about what has actually happened.
I have never been able to catch Bowlen in a lie. Shanny lied all the time…McD lies…Cutler lies. For some reason, Bowlen doesn’t flat out lie to the media…maybe that’s why he is so awkward in public. Fire Cutler and let’s move on!
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 2:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
makes you believe that the “conversation” between Cutler and Bowlen never happened. Now the boss isn’t happy when his QB is trying to make an ass out of him
by hallandnash on Apr 1, 2009 2:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The rest of my comment got deleted...I'll sum it up here:
Basically, when was the last time you caught Bowlen in a LIE? Shanny lied, McD lies, Cutler lies…but really, Bowlen always tells the relative truth. Maybe that is why he is so awkward in public. I believe him when he gave his reasons for firing the Goodman’s. I believe him when he says he tried to contact Cutler and was snubbed and told Cutler still wants a trade. The fault here falls squarely on Cutler’s shoulder and Bowlen has every right to fire him for it.
Bowlen fired Reeves because he was wrong in the way he was dealing with Elway and certain staff there(Shanny). Now Bowlen is firing his quarterback for the same thing. Bowlen did what he thought was best and this is what is best for the team. Why do any of you want Bowlen to lick Cutler’s boot heel to get him back into the locker room where the rest of the team will no longer respect the owner nor care much for their QB who “bucked the system” and got special treatment when the rest of them don’t get special treatment.
Fire Cutler and move on.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 2:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ask Parcells
Players can and should be treated differently based on the value they have (i.e., how good they are).
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 2:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't like Parcells style of coaching...
he won two Super Bowls…but he never built a dynasty. I prefer Bilichek’s style…team first=dynasty potential.
me first=maybe one or two Super Bowls in a decade or 0-16…
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 2:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dont forget video taping, Zappa ;)
Just playing with ya… I prefer neither coach and really despise Bellicheat.
I want my Shannatan back! lol…
by tunga77 on Apr 1, 2009 2:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem with Bowlen recently is not lying per se
It is making statements that he means at the time, but which later turn out to be untrue. (Shanahan is the coach for life, Cutler is obviously the man now, Jim Goodman has and will have a job)
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 2:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but the point is...
he does what is best for the Denver Broncos. He may have wanted Shanny as a coach for life, but 24-24 is unacceptable for the Denver Broncos. He may have wanted Cutler to be the man, but that was before he figured out that Cutler had no desire to play for him which turned out to be unacceptable for the Denver Broncos. He wanted Jim Goodman to be the GM, but his son didn’t want to share responsibilities with Xanders..which turned out to be unacceptable for the Denver Broncos.
Pat Bowlen is honest, but he will always do what needs to be done for the Denver Broncos to remain a competitive football team. And as an owner, that does not mean grovelling to your star players. Green Bay didn’t do it for Favre, a Hall of Famer, why would Denver do it for Cutler???
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 2:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah but the result is...
that people are less likely to trust your promises when you have shown that you can change your mind.
If Cutler really was the man in Bowlen’s eyes, Bowlen would have been much more forceful in emphasizing that to both Jay and Josh when this whole thing became public. You may disagree, but IMO Bowlen’s decision to back McDaniels over Cutler at that point was what triggered Cutler’s decision that he could not play in Denver. Before that point Cutler was upset, but he could have been placated
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 2:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess that's where the term "snowballed" comes from.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 2:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do we really know why the Goodmans were fired?
Bowlen said he knew the decision to streamline the personnel department, with Xanders at the top, would leave Jeff Goodman “disenfranchised.”
Bowlen acknowledged some “anxiety” between Jeff Goodman and Xanders as they shared duties, and though Bowlen said there was no friction in their relationship, it was inevitable that the one not picked to be GM would have to leave.
“My decision was to pick Brian as the general manager, and once I did that I don’t think Jeff felt — he didn’t come out and say this — but he felt he should have moved on,” Bowlen said. “I think he should move on to a different organization and become a general manager.”
By going with Xanders, that also meant proceeding without Jim Goodman, who had been with the Broncos for 11 years. Bowlen said he didn’t think Jim would be comfortable staying without Jeff.
“I don’t think it would have worked,” Bowlen said. “Knowing Jim for a long time, I have a great deal of respect for him. Jim is a top-notch guy who could run anybody’s scouting department. And I felt he should be given that opportunity.” .
That does not sound like they were fired for the reasons you said. Similar but not the same. Bowlen decided he wanted Brian Xanders to be the GM. That meant a demotion for Jim Goodman and that Jeff Goodman would now report to someone who was previously his peer. Bowlen did not want to ask either Goodman to do that so he fired them (or allowed them to seek other oppurtunites as the euphimism goes).
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 2:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is basically the jist...its been awhile.
Thank you for jogging my memory. I was lazy and didn’t feel like going and looking it up, so I went with the impression I took away from that saga. It seems like so long ago. lmao Still, there were reports of friction between the Goodman’s and Xanders. I do remember that part of the equation.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 2:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So it goes back to my point
Just because Pat Bowlen says something and means it today does not mean that you can count on him feeling that way in a few months. I would almost prefer knowing that he was lying to me. (And I say this as a general comment, and not just related to the Cutler mess)
by MattR on Apr 1, 2009 2:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather have an owner who consistently does the right thing
than one who will never admit he was wrong or change his mind and thus drag the entire organization down with him….al la Al Davis.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 2:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you kidding Zappa?!
Bowlen CAN’T fire McD!! he’s already paying Shanny $7 Million to play golf and sit in his huge house laughing his ass off at us! He’s not going to fire his new coach and add another $3 Million to that amount.
Mr. Bowlen has to make the best of a bad situation but his actions (or lack thereof) and lack of control over his new and inexperienced coach, are a big part of why we are here IMO.
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 2:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't ask for McD to be fired..
I said FIRE CUTLER and move on. :)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 2:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hrm
I thought you said "If that were true, Bowlen would have fired McD… "
My point is that there is no way Mr. Bowlen could fire McD. You think the League is laughing at us now . . . that would be beyond brutal!
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 1, 2009 2:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If it were true...it wasn't true, hence Cutler being fired. lol
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 2:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait a second...I think you all know that we can come out of this with something good.
Why not trade Cutler to the Lions, for the #1 overall. Then, have Cleveland involved also. Have Cleveland send Quinn to Denver. As to what Cleveland gets…I don’t know.
What I want the Broncos to do before the start of next season:
1) Improve the defense drastically.
2) Improve terms with Jay Cutler.
3) Talk Jay into firing Bus Cook as his agent.
4) Sign Torry Holt to a 1 year deal.
Let's go BRONCOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by broncoholic on Apr 1, 2009 2:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never understood why Mike gave up on Jake so quickly. The sad part is that I’m sure Jay will become a star — just elsewhere. But that’s life. I’m hoping the McD/Cassel combo was more about McDaniels than Cassel .. I guess we’ll find out this year.
by hallandnash on Apr 1, 2009 1:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent Post. Top notch.
People have to think about this situation logically.
10 teams looking to trade for Jay Cutler.
Lets say 6 are serious.
How many of those 6 teams are willing to give a 1st and 2nd for Jay? I say all six
How many are willing to give 1st a 2nd and 2010 2nd or a starter? 4 maybe 5
This is not counting the team or 2 that will want to drive the price up to hurt divisional rivals. The team trying to create buzz at all cost. The coaching staff that is about to get fired.
Everything should fit on a scale. Each team has to consider that other teams are willing to give up a minumim of X. Denver is not going to say what they want, because that is tipping your hand. You look at every solid offer, and take the best offer and go back to the teams that offered less. This is the best offer, can you do better? No. Go to the next team. Yes. We will get back to you. Go to the remaining teams. repeat process until there is only one.
For those of you that play Texas Hold-em know, if you have a solid hand, you beat high early to get the small game out of the pool. You don’t raise $5 with pocket aces.
If a team comes with a valid offer and it is insulting, that team risks being out before it begins. If I know 9 other teams want him, I am going to give nearly my best shot early. What’s an addition 4th? or and additional 3rd?
Whatever the starting point is, you have to believe with this many players the price is going to go up fast.
by no-pseudo-fan on Apr 1, 2009 1:58 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Props
This was definitely a good article. I liked how you explained it all and what the stakes are.
I am sick of people saying the Broncos devalued Jay by saying that he was now available. Yeah right, what makes his value go up is the sudden rush of teams wanting him on his team. The Demand is ridiculously high for a gunslinging QB who does indeed win games. And with everyone and their dog trying to get him…it won’t be a question who…but how much.
by DailyDose on Apr 1, 2009 2:10 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Dan Patrick
Just FYI, on Dan Patrick’s show airing right now he said that at the top of the hour Peter King will be on to talk more about Cutler, if anyone’s interested. That’d be 2 PST/3MST
Caught Patrick talking just briefly about this whole thing and he said he found it hard to believe that the Broncos would trade him to anyone in the AFC. (Just his conjecture.)
by underdog on Apr 1, 2009 2:24 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Only interested
if King doesn’t talk about the soap opera and focuses on trade news.
"THIS IS SPARTA!!!" -- papigrande
"The cutsper gives up 100 000 dollars guy, come on custper you should show up and then give the 100 000 dollar to me so I can put down payment on the bronco cheerleader retire home where they can sit and eat all kind of pizza and chip and not have to worry any more about make for little waist in off seasnoal" -- Horvil Tiki
by broncosmontana on Apr 1, 2009 2:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
what trade news?
us fans won’t know jack until a deal is struck…or until Adam Schefter is told what the deal is.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 2:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
and Adam ain’t talkin until he gets his $$$. : )
"THIS IS SPARTA!!!" -- papigrande
"The cutsper gives up 100 000 dollars guy, come on custper you should show up and then give the 100 000 dollar to me so I can put down payment on the bronco cheerleader retire home where they can sit and eat all kind of pizza and chip and not have to worry any more about make for little waist in off seasnoal" -- Horvil Tiki
by broncosmontana on Apr 1, 2009 2:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cleveland trade
What is the infatuation with Quinn? There are other options for QB (Garcia, Leftwich, etc.). It seems to me that Rogers would be much more valuable to us.
by CoastalBronco on Apr 1, 2009 2:28 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
No Deal
I don’t think anything will be done until the draft. Which would be bad for Denver. Teams get weird around the draft with their picks.
by whodeyfans on Apr 1, 2009 2:28 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
mcoach has had a couple weeks of watching simms
ive always been high on him and in this system who knows. It would be nice to collect draft picks only and not waste some of the value on average QB talent. Also, how nice would it be to package BM and possibly Sheffler to detroit to get calvin ,either 20 or 33 and next years first. Zappa, should have my cod4 up and running in a day or two,are you still playing? Oh yeah,and cutler in detroit would make me smile for years
"show me a good loser and i'll show you a loser" - coach
by chikndnnr on Apr 1, 2009 2:30 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd still like a guy with a gun in our climate
but there is something to be said for smarts in the new system. We’ll see.
"THIS IS SPARTA!!!" -- papigrande
"The cutsper gives up 100 000 dollars guy, come on custper you should show up and then give the 100 000 dollar to me so I can put down payment on the bronco cheerleader retire home where they can sit and eat all kind of pizza and chip and not have to worry any more about make for little waist in off seasnoal" -- Horvil Tiki
by broncosmontana on Apr 1, 2009 2:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What a joke.
I can’t even tell if you’re serious or not about the two first rounders, 2nd and 4th.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk
by hibachi on Apr 1, 2009 3:42 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
oh yeah
and add the “starting caliber player” to that too. ha!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk
by hibachi on Apr 1, 2009 3:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for that
It really brought a lot to the table here.
by AllBroncsallday on Apr 1, 2009 4:34 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Sure it does.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk
by hibachi on Apr 1, 2009 8:35 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So I just read
We were one of 2 teams that did not attend the USC pro day
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 1, 2009 3:51 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
49ers Perspective (well one 49ers fan)
This Cutler thing has a thread (a contentious one) on the Niners Nation with over 200 posts and growing. Its got 49ers fans mad at each other.
I know my team isn’t very good. And I know our QB’s arent the greatest. And I know alot of 49ers fans want this guy. But I seriously hope we don’t make a trade on the terms of the original post. Certainly you guys would want that, but I don’t want my team to be on the ass-end of Hershel Walker part 2. This is regardless of Cutler being a little girl. And that just makes it worse. If we get him for a sweet heart deal for us fine (don’t worry won’t happen), but two first rounders and or more? I seriously hope my team doesnt do this.
Also as an outsider I am mystified how this situation got to this. I’m sure you guys have dissected this to death, but still, what is going on over there?
by save10 on Apr 1, 2009 5:07 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
FYI, Cutler has the talent to be your long term answer...
just don’t ever…EVER treat him like a man. He needs to be coddled like a 4 year old and praised for the slightest achievement…but never criticized.
If you can live up to those rules, he could probably lead you to the promised land.
btw, we demand two first rounders and a proven veteran. :)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 1, 2009 5:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I WANT...
Brady Quinn and Shaun Rodgers! They can keep their picks. Give me those two (and believe me McD WILL turn Quinn into a HUGE Star) and I will be a happy happy man.
I think this whole mess has really shown us what Cutler really is, but we were to enamored to see it and admit it…a LOSER. Good riddance to bad rubbish I say, the kid will never win anything until he learns to be a little more humble and learns that the world actually DOESN’T revolve around him. Quinn will be a better QB under McD than Cutler in 2 years, bank on it!
GO BRONCOS!
Go M's
by OBF on Apr 1, 2009 5:26 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Quinn + Rodgers
is not enogh for Culter that is not an even trade. they would have to at least include the 5th pick or next years #1 pick
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 1, 2009 5:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree....
I would take Quinn and Rogers and say thank you.
The best NT in the business who still has plenty left in the tamnk and a 24 year old QB who put up similiar to better numbers in the combine as Cutler, who has a better college record?
Thats a decent deal.
I bellieve there is NO better QB coaches than McDaniels and McCoy…and remember, Dennison is no slouch either as a developer of talent. That is a great staff for devloping young talent.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
by boydy2669 on Apr 1, 2009 6:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who exactly.....
Has McDaniels and McCoy coached to prove that no one is better with quarterbacks?
McDaniels was a defensive coach when Brady won his first two Super Bowls. He developed Cassel into an 11 win QB, but everyone and their brother said The Pats would win 10+ games after Brady went down and that was before people even knew who McDaniels was. Brady had more to do with Cassels growth than McDaniels.
I live in the Detroit area forced to watch Lions football, Shawn Rogers is a malcontent that takes too many plays off to be the best NT in the business. He wanted out fo Detroit, so they sent him to Cleveland. Now he wants out fo Cleveland and you expect him to be happy in Denver for the rest of his career? Your trading one person who wants out of Denver for another that will someday want out. Even though Denver needs a NT, this move makes no sense without draft picks included.
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 6:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
CUTLER FOR HASSELBECK
Here is a win win deal. Cutler & your #12 pick to the Seahawks for Hasselbeck and their 4 pick. You get a proven PRO Bowl QB who is 34 and should have at least a couple of good years left. You get #4 pick to use on one of the top 2 young QB’s in this draft who could be mentored by Hass for 2 years (or anyone else). We get a young Pro Bowl QB and your # 12 pick.
by walruz on Apr 1, 2009 6:31 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Not even close......
Basically, in your offer, Seattle would be getting the better deal. It basically cost you nothing to get a 25 year old Pro-Bowl Quarterback. You actually come out on top by trading back so as to spend less money on the draft pick.
Now if they threw in their 2009 second rounder and 2010 first rounder, they might have a deal.
But Cutler for an injured Hasselbeck and a higher draft pick…..Pass.
by metalmute on Apr 1, 2009 6:35 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Broncos want north of two first rounders...Hasselbeck is not a first rounder.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 2, 2009 10:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Love it
Don’t trade him, make him sit at home, and pay him the money you owe him…2 firsts and a 2nd and a 4th for a guy holding the team hostage and who will demand a new contract to be traded….hahaha
by nebulus on Apr 1, 2009 8:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm a Detroit Lions fan
1 and 20 with Ernie Sims for Cutler, 12 and 48
You’d fill 1 LB spot with Ernie, take Curry at #1 to completly shore up your linebacking core into the best in the league, and BPA @ 20.
Yes, Sims didn’t do to well last year, but with what he was surrounded by, you gotta admit it was not his fault. He is a stud
Besides, you guys owe us for George “False Start” Foster and Tatum “Bellhop”. He really did fumble the swiped duffle bags, too
by JazzyBBP on Apr 1, 2009 9:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
How about
Billy Sims instead? We could use another “veteran” running back.
by underdog on Apr 1, 2009 11:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't give up Billy...
Millen re-signed him with a no-trade clause and a HUGE cap-hit if we did try to move him unless you guys were to give up a 14th rounder from the ’88 draft. How about Robert Porcher instead?
by JazzyBBP on Apr 2, 2009 8:54 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
HA HA HA HA
thanks I needed a good laugh. If you think we will be trading away ANY draft picks you are nuts
http://www.davusx.net/assets/db/la_la_land.gif
"We should have kept Seattle and dumped San Diego from the Division"
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
by Jon Tollerud on Apr 2, 2009 12:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LMRO !!!!!!
Ludicrous, maybe….but the George and Tatum line gave me a he77 of a laugh……
by rockymtnfan on Apr 1, 2009 10:58 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
How about
your friends over in Santa Clara send you this year’s 10 and next year’s first and 3rd rounder? Eh? Eh?
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley [insert witty comment]
Thanks to roger
by bondslegend on Apr 2, 2009 12:48 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Ricky Williams
Does anyone remember what the Saints gave up to Draft Ricky Williams? I can see one of the 31 other NFL franchises going that far.
The Saints gave up all 6 remaining draft picks in 99’ and then a 1st and 3rd in 00’ draft, wow, all that for a running back who hasn’t played a down in the NFL….
Image what the Broncos can get for a Pro Bowl QB getting paid only 1 million in base salary next year?!?…
Now it might not end up being all that, but don’t be suprised if one of the interested teams give up the farm to get Cutler.
by Jeremy Foster on Apr 2, 2009 9:01 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
If you denver fans
think you are getting two firsts and a qb like quinn you are out of your mind. As a browns fans i would not trade quinn and rodgers for cutler regardless id rather keep quinn and have the best nt in the game if we gave you quinn and rodgers youd have to at least throw in your second. Cutler reminds me so much of da remeber he made a pro bowl to and is 25. He will be traded to redskins or detroit i think. Jets just do not have enough to offer i really do not see the browns getting involved because your asking price is so high and we are already good at the qb position…plus our new oc was also runs the same offense as weis so it doesn make sense.
by cgerycz on Apr 2, 2009 9:17 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
































