MHR Broncos History Lesson - Ring of Fame -- Class of 1986
Yet another Ring of Fame class has been completed. The Class of 1986 was an important one as we honored three men who each played a significant role in shaping the identities of their respective teams. They may not have been the best Broncos ever to don a uniform or even close to being Hall of Fame-worthy, but those things don't matter when it comes to the impact on Broncos history each had.
The first two years since Pat Bowlen instituted the Ring of Fame, the Broncos inducted four of the greatest Broncos Legends of our early history, as well as an owner who stepped in to keep the Broncos in Denver back in the 1960's. 1986 became the Class that would honor the less-heralded Broncos whose impact may have been greater on the team's success during their times than the legends who were honored before them.
|
| Photo via DenverBroncos.com |
Many of you may wonder why Kyle Orton is wearing the #8 rather than the #18. The reason is that a man who was enshrined into the Ring of Fame in 1986 wore the #18 for three seasons as a Bronco. His name, Frank Tripucka. He played for almost two decades in the NFL, CFL, and AFL. His final four seasons as a player were spent in Denver from 1960-1963. He led a pass-happy offense that lost a lot of games, but he and Lionel Taylor hooked up for a league-best 192 times over two seasons and helped the Broncos to their only .500 season of the team's first 13 years in existence. Their 7-7 record in 1962 was almost enough to earn a playoff berth, but in the end that would be the only season they came close to breaking .500 for a long time.
Frank Tripucka would retire in 1963 and the Broncos would struggle to win four games for the next ten years. Tripucka's number would eventually be retired ,and even though his meaning to the team in those early years has mostly been lost over time, we can all appreciate that he helped ensure the team's future successes. Tripucka helped to lay the foundation of Broncomania in the hearts of many youngsters who used to catch the practices and games from a nearby hill. It is fitting that no player will ever wear the #18 again.
| Frank Tripucka's Bronco Stats | |||||||||
| Year | Team | GM | ATT | CMP | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | LNG |
| 1960 | DEN | 14 | 478 | 248 | 51.9 | 3038 | 24 | 34 | 80t |
| 1961 | DEN | 14 | 344 | 167 | 48.5 | 1690 | 10 | 21 | 87 |
| 1962 | DEN | 14 | 440 | 240 | 64.5 | 2717 | 17 | 25 | 96t |
| 1963 | DEN | 2 | 7 | 15 | 46.7 | 31 | 0 | 5 | 14 |
|
| Photo via DenverBroncos.com |
Paul Smith was drafted by the Broncos in 1968 and would go on to become the first player in Broncos history to spend a full ten seasons with the team. Smith would also become the foundation of the Orange Crush defense. He would be the mentor to the talented guys that would be drafted in the early 70's.
Paul Smith would languish for half of his career on a team that was trying desperately to find its identity. The old workhorse would be a major part of transforming the team from league doormats in the late 60's to AFC Champions a decade later. Smith would retire a year after reaching the Super Bowl in 1977.
Sadly, Paul Smith passed away due to complications with pancreatic cancer in March of 2000. He will forever be remembered as a dominant interior lineman for the famous Orange Crush defense. Not bad for a ninth-round draft pick out of the original American Football League.
| Paul Smith's Career Bronco Stats | |
| Games | Sacks |
| 135 | 55 |
|
| Photo via DenverBroncos.com |
Charley Johnson's contribution to the Denver Broncos was far more than the meager stats he accumulated. Johnson instilled a winning attitude with the players and the organization as a whole. He was instrumental in snapping a twenty-game losing streak to the Oakland Raiders in 1972. He also led the team to its first winning season in franchise history in 1973 with a 7-5-2 record.
The Denver Broncos had over two dozen starting quarterbacks in the ten years between Frank Tripucka's retirement and the arrival of Charley Johnson. Though Johnson only played for the team for three seasons, he set the standard for QB play in Denver for decades to come. After Johnson, the Broncos would find stability at the position for nearly two and a half decades. A quarterback carousel would not return to Denver until after John Elway's retirement.
Charley Johnson would be the first Broncos quarterback to end his tenure with the team with a winning record, at 20-18-3 as a starter. It may not look like much, but that was for a team that had a winning percentage of .286 in the franchise's first twelve seasons.
| Charley Johnson's Bronco Stats | ||||||||||
| Year | Team | G | Comp | Att | Pct | Yds | TD | INT | Sck | Rate |
| 1972 | Den | 12 | 132 | 238 | 55.5 | 1783 | 14 | 14 | 12 | 74.6 |
| 1973 | Den | 14 | 184 | 346 | 53.2 | 2465 | 20 | 17 | 26 | 74.9 |
| 1974 | Den | 14 | 136 | 244 | 55.7 | 1969 | 13 | 9 | 36 | 84.5 |
| 1975 | Den | 14 | 65 | 142 | 45.8 | 1021 | 5 | 12 | 10 | 46.7 |
5 recs |
26 comments
|
Comments
My vote:
Though Frank Tripucka has his number retired, I must still vote with my heart and my heart says that Lionel Taylor is the only reason Tripucka had any success in Denver. The dude had almost 200 catches over a two year span in a day when the all-pro wide receivers would normally catch 60-70 balls. That kind of production deserves the attention of the Hall of Fame, but alas, Taylor played his entire career in the AFL and retired early due to the wear and tear on his body from being the focus of double and even triple coverage on the hapless Broncos teams of the 1960’s.
Lionel Taylor set one record that stood for decades. And it took a league expansion to 16 games in a season to break it. The record was for the most catches in a six year span. The record was 503, Sterling Sharpe broke it nearly thirty years later, yet had 14 extra games to break it in. In any case, I made my pitch for Lionel Taylor’s induction into the Hall of Fame last year…but my feelings remain the same.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 13, 2009 4:29 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Your rec on this post came from me . . .
I’m a fan of all these guys, and I saw them all play.
Lionel Taylor was in a class by himself . . .
Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy
by AZDynamics on Apr 13, 2009 10:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I didn't see Gerald Phipps play. (heehee)
Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy
by AZDynamics on Apr 13, 2009 10:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks man!
I wish I could have seen Taylor play.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 13, 2009 10:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I haven't voted yet because I am torn between two players--Goose and Taylor
I dug out some brief bio’s to help me decide:
.
Austin Gonsoulin of Baylor University was the original Denver Bronco, the first player selected for the team in the 1960 season.
By the end of his Bronco career, he was the all-time American Football League interception leader with 43. He made the first interception in AFL history, in the first AFL game against the Patriots. He had seven interceptions in his first three games, and his 11 pickoffs in 1960 are still a Denver club record.
Gonsoulin shares the team record for interceptions in a game with four, a feat he accomplished Sept. 18, 1960 at Buffalo. Gonsoulin was an All-American Football League choice in 1960, 1962 and 1963. His amazing durablity and toughness enabled him to start 61 consecutive games at one point in his career. He was selected to the second team, All-Time All-AFL. Gonsoulin was also the captain of his college team at Baylor.
.
A member of the
American Football League Hall of Fame
.
For the first six years of existence of the American Football League, one man led the league in receptions each year: Lionel Taylor from New Mexico Highlands University, where he had starred in basketball and track, and made all-conference wide receiver in 1956 and 1957. Taylor is second in all-time receptions (543) for the Denver Broncos, and is their all-time leading receiver in yardage (6,872). Taylor was the Broncos’ team Most Valuable Player in 1963, 1964 and 1965, and an American Football League All-Star in 1961, 1962 and 1965. Taylor was the first professional football receiver ever to make one hundred receptions in a single season (1961), and he accomplished that feat in only 14 games. He had four seasons with over 1,000 yards receiving, and averaged 84.7 catches from 1960 to 1965, at the time the highest six-year total in professional football history. He finished his career with the Houston Oilers, as the AFL’s all-time reception leader with 567.
A member of the
American Football League
Hall of Fame
Both members of the
American Football League Hall of Fame
I can’t decide
Guardian of the Gate to La La Land!
Little, Wright, Atwater, Davis, and Sharpe...
Why are they not in the Hall...I just don't understand.
by Mike Clark on Apr 13, 2009 4:33 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I too wanted to vote for Goose Gonsoulin.
He was a wily player for us. He deserves some votes, but his enshrinement into the AFL Hall of Fame is a pretty great honor. Lionel Taylor did things that wouldn’t be duplicated, statistically anyway, for decades. In the Goose’s defense…he still holds the record for the most INT’s in a single season. Come on Champ Bailey! heheh
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 13, 2009 4:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
by the way, both Goose and Lionel are members of the original
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 13, 2009 4:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I loved them both as a kid--but I, for some reason, really liked Gonsoulin--I think it was the nickname "Goose"
They both should be in the ‘Hall’
.
East an Left-coast Sportswriters that vote on these things should be ashamed
Guardian of the Gate to La La Land!
Little, Wright, Atwater, Davis, and Sharpe...
Why are they not in the Hall...I just don't understand.
by Mike Clark on Apr 13, 2009 4:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lionel has plenty of votes...Goose hasn't got any love. Vote Goose!
I wish I had now. lol I liked him more before I quit smoking…but now that I am an anti-smoke nazi, his appeal to me is less than what it was. I still can’t get over how he would smoke a cig between possessions. What an era the 60’s were in football and what a league the AFL was!
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 13, 2009 4:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, I just gave Goose some love
Guardian of the Gate to La La Land!
Little, Wright, Atwater, Davis, and Sharpe...
Why are they not in the Hall...I just don't understand.
by Mike Clark on Apr 13, 2009 4:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly
I cant say any of these guys are real hall of fame bonafides. They were good players on horrbile Bronco teams. From 1960-67 Denver won over 5 games once (1962). the other times 4 ,3, 2,2,4,4, and 3. Thats 22 wins in the years 1960-67 (not counting 1962). Taylor while he was good and was the first wr to catch 100 in a season was not what you would call a dangerous player. Look he was the only threat and teams would let him nickle and dime them knowing when push came to shove they would stop the Denver offense. Jackson could have been a hofer but was hampered by knee injuries. I fell there are more deserving players from the 70’s and 80’s who are hall worthy, but only two players who started their careers in the 60’s for Denver are hall worthy (Little and Billy Thompson). This is probably not going to be popular here, but thats what i think. Regardless of what we feel about the players the team was pitiful. Also Charley Johnson wasnt nothing more than a journeyman QB, but he was pivital to the Broncos new found success in 1973-74.
somethings wrong, Trying to conquer these fears i thought were gone. And it's been so long, I'm dying to live in a world i don't belong
by broncfanstuckinsd on Apr 13, 2009 6:19 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
That is probably the exact argument made by the east boast bias...
I can’t knock how you feel, but for a team that only won 27 games in 8 years…and a quarterback how once threw 34 INTs in 14 games….Lionel Taylor still dominated. He could only be stopped when triple teamed…and our opponents could get away with it because the rest of our team couldn’t do crap without Taylor moving the sticks. That’s just my perception though.
Goose was a solid player, but that defense regularly gave up 50 points so yeah. I get what you are saying. I just disagree about Lionel Taylor…dude was great…if he had played for a Championship team he would be in the Hall no question.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 13, 2009 6:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
you know
I am real vocal about the lack of Broncos in the hall, but those 2 IMO are not near as worthy as others. Like Gradishar, Little, Thompson, Louis Wright, Meck, TJ. No matter how much we hate the bias of the voters wins and losses do come into play as crappy as it is
somethings wrong, Trying to conquer these fears i thought were gone. And it's been so long, I'm dying to live in a world i don't belong
by broncfanstuckinsd on Apr 13, 2009 6:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is good
to be judicious about our application of the HOF label. Devaluing it does us no more good than not being valued by it in the first place.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 13, 2009 7:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still think Lionel Taylor deserves to be looked at.
Lionel Taylor is, in my opinion, our only Hall of Fame worthy player from the 1960’s. Not to dilute the Hall of Fame worthiness, but here are my MUST HAVE IN THE HALL IMMEDIATELY:
Lionel Taylor
Floyd Little
Randy Gradishar
Shannon Sharpe
Those who should get in but have a while to wait still:
Terrell Davis
Tom Nalen
Billy Thompson
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 13, 2009 10:35 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lionel Taylor was great and so was Rich Jackson
Rich jackson was just unlucky that he played in an era when severe knee injuries were career enders. The same injury to day and he would have been back on the field in 6 months.
But when you are one of the people responsible for a rule change in the NFL, you know he had some influence on the game. He had the most vicous head slap of any defensive player in the game. He is one of the primary players that pushed Pro football to outlaw the move. It had been around a long time, but Jackson took it to new levels.
"Now we have them where we want them"
-Kieth Bishop - On the Denver 2 yard line, Cleveland Ohio, 1987
by AlanC on Apr 13, 2009 6:37 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Taylors recieving yards
I think if you look at Taylor’s average yards per catch and season total yards, you would see that he caught far more than just dink and dunk passes. He was an exceptional route runner and would catch anything that got near him. He battled for the ball and if he played in this game now, he would still be a premier reciever.
"Now we have them where we want them"
-Kieth Bishop - On the Denver 2 yard line, Cleveland Ohio, 1987
by AlanC on Apr 13, 2009 6:39 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
he averaged 12.7 yards per catch. Thats nothing more than dink and dunk. Especially in a league that was know for explosive passing atttacks
somethings wrong, Trying to conquer these fears i thought were gone. And it's been so long, I'm dying to live in a world i don't belong
by broncfanstuckinsd on Apr 13, 2009 6:51 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You need to learn your history....
12.7 ypc was a good number even in those “explosive” passing attacks. In those day a DB could have all the contact they wanted until the ball was in the air. Fans who try to compare statistics of modern players with players of that era just don’t know what they are talking about!
There’s a very good reason why almost no one from that era is on any of the career receiving lists. It was a much different game. There was no 5-yard contact rule, no limit to the number of defenders who could chuck a receiver at the line, no rule against blows to the head, etc.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Apr 13, 2009 7:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
no you need to learn your history
First off you dont know me or what I know. So there are better ways to have a discussion on what I perceive as a good ypc. Yes I am 100% aware of the rule changes in 1978 to give the passing game more power. Look at Alworths ypc he played in the 60’s. When you first statement is to learn MY history your argument is nothing but an attack. Now if you want to discuss this rationally I am all for, but without knowing what I do and dont know is bad form. I would expect this on the post. I am disappointed in that SWG
somethings wrong, Trying to conquer these fears i thought were gone. And it's been so long, I'm dying to live in a world i don't belong
by broncfanstuckinsd on Apr 13, 2009 7:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am going to have to side with bfsisd on this one point...
only because that YPC was the single stat that Lionel Taylor failed to surpass other HOF WR from that era. My argument against that is that Lionel Taylor was the only threat offensively and was forced to catch balls in traffic a majority of the time… The other Hall of Famers who caught less balls but went for longer gains didn’t have to worry about being triple covered. Lionel Taylor did what he did with poor QB play, poor RB play, poor defensive play, poor special teams, poor coaching, poor everything. That kind of performance demands respect.
You may feel Lionel Taylor doesn’t deserve HOF recognition, but I respectfully disagree. There is a reason why he joined Floyd Little in the inaugural Ring of Fame induction. YPC are not the end all be all of hall of fame statistics…teams “let” Taylor nickel and dime them all day, but triple covered him near the end zone and that is why Denver was stopped. Taylor could only be stopped by focusing the defense on stopping him alone. That is where you and I part ways in the way we see Lionel Taylor the player.
I posted a link above to Lionel Taylors bio…also in there are links to 5 of the “best” WRs from that era.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Apr 13, 2009 10:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey SWG,
I appreciate your points on the type of pass defense played back then. It could be brutal and a wide receiver earned every yard the hard way. I also appreciate your passion as you advocate for Lionel Taylor. I think he should be in the hall of fame, (de-emphasis added).
But I must agree with bfssd on the “you need to learn your history” comment. That one statement attacks the person making the comments rather than the comments themselves. Anybody who wants to can jump in and correct me if I’m wrong, but I think think we’ve reached a consensus around here that comments are fair game but people are not.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on Apr 14, 2009 8:50 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good post, Jack . . .
I think that is one M.O. we must continue around here: we moderate ourselves (i.e., each other) on the board. That is part of what makes this such a good one. We have an exceptional dearth of personal attacks here, and it has made this an enjoyable experience for all of us. :)
Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy
by AZDynamics on Apr 14, 2009 11:33 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a great site and that is one of the reasons.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on Apr 14, 2009 2:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right....
my bad, I shouldn’t have made it personal. But if 12.7 ypr makes Taylor a “Dink and Dunk” player what does that say about cutler’s 11.8 ypr.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Apr 15, 2009 7:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
BTW, this was a hard one.
I couldn’t decide either. But I finally settled on Paul Smith because he played at such a high level, so consistantly and for so long. Not only that, but he was so low key about it and really was one of those special figures who gave back to the team by selflessly teaching the yoiunger players everything he knew.
Really, the world is a better place for having some one like Paul Smith in it.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on Apr 14, 2009 8:56 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs



































