Like a bad dream
Warning: If you want sunshine and happiness about this offseason, look elsewhere. If, on the other hand, you like dispassionate and semi-objective analysis from a diehard fan, read on. This is simply a rewind on the offseason from my own extremely confused and unhappy perspective.
Going into this offseason, I was pretty excited about the Broncos. Sure, the defense was awful and the coaching on that side of the ball seemed inept to say the least, but the offense! We had the best young QB in football. The offensive line was young and excellent already. Every skill position was set. On top of that, we had the best offensive mind in football, and the drafting issues appeared to be behind him after a solid 2008 draft.
All we needed was a good defensive draft, some new defensive coaches and this team was Super Bowl bound in the near future, I was convinced.
Then Mike Shanahan was fired. I was stunned at first, but as more info came out and I considered the past, it made sense. Shanahan had refused to fire Bob Slowik, who was clearly not the answer as a defensive coach, or relenquish player personnel control at all. Shanahan's management and player development decisions were questionable at best -- his drafts before the last had been awful with few exceptions. His choices as subordinates had not gotten the job done. Shanahan's obsession with power was counter-productive. When Pat Bowlen said it was time for a change, I accepted it. One step backwards to make two steps forward, right?
Some time later, the hire was announced: Josh McDaniels. At first it seemed a strange choice -- the 32 year old McDaniels had little in the way of a resume and was another offensive-minded coach. Hadn't we just fired the greatest offensive mind in football?
But as I read the information, I managed to rationalize it to myself. McDaniels had the potential to be a Shanahan-level genius according to all reports, and this new coach wouldn't have all of the player personnel choices left to him. A better power structure would lead to better drafting and personnel decisions, right? Perhaps he could get a better DC in (and he did in Mike Nolan). One step backwards in coaching ability for 2 steps forward in organizational structure, right?
Over the next few weeks, Jeremy Bates, widely considered a brilliant offensive mind and a "keeper", was let go, along with the Goodmans as GMs. Not a big deal, I told myself, ust more old guard cleaning out. But wait a second, who's in control of player personnel now? Brian Xanders, the new GM, is mostly a numbers guy. Does this mean the coach is back in control of player personnel? Wasn't having a better power structure a major reason Shanahan was fired? Well, maybe McDaniels is better at player personnel. Yeah, that's it.
As free agency commenced, things appeared to be in good shape. Brain Dawkins and the glut of other signings were focused on plugging secondary holes on a simply awful defense that needed help virtually everywhere. There were a couple puzzling RB signings given the presence of Peyton Hillis and Ryan Torain as at least passable options, but whatever. No biggie, just a coach wanting some more depth. And dumping Mike Leach, a brilliant long snapper and well-liked locker room figure for the Pats long snapper? Why would McDaniels do that -- is he that obsessed with his own guys that he would risk alienating the locker room like that? Puzzling...
Then, the Cutler/Cassel fiasco occurred. No need to recap the mess, but I felt there was blame on both sides, and because of immaturity on both sides the situation was untenable. You can't have a disgruntled and newly-revealed-to-be-immature guy like that leading your team, right? No choice but to trade him, and we got excellent value with 2 firsts, a third and The Neckbeard himself, Kyle Orton. One step backwards in QB talent to take two steps forward fixing the defense, right?
Which brings us to today, the first day of the draft. Time to fix the front 7, at last! After all this, our needs are clear: we need starters at NT, 3-4 DE, and rush OLB, and we have both the picks to make it happen and to make sure we don't have reach for these positions of need or ignore great value out there.
Instead, we got...this. At pick 12, Brian Orakpo is available, a great value by all accounts AND at a position of need. No brainer! But we passed him up for Knowshon Moreno -- another good value pick and a good player for sure, but at a position the team had already pursued in free agency (RB), and that had substantial talent at the spot already in Hillis and others. I am puzzled, and frustrated. I guess we'll be taking front 7 guys with the rest of the picks, right?
Pick 18, Robert Ayers. A one year wonder 4-3 DE that most figure as a rush OLB in the pros. He's got red flags for me -- major Jarvis Moss deja-vu anyone? Isn't he a bit small to be a 3-4 DE? -- but hey, at least we're improving an area of need without reaching too much.
Pick 37, Alphonso Smith, for the Bronco's #1 next year. Look, I like Smith. He's a value at #37 despite his size. But didn't we spend money in free agency to patch up this position? Aren't there awesome options available right now at positions of need, like Connor Barwin? I'm no Brace fan, but isn't he a fit at a huge need in NT? Most of all, we gave up a probable top 10 pick next year for this guy? I'm literally speechless. I cannot conceive what might possibly have happened to trigger this sort of insanity.
Pick 48, Darcel McBath? A SAFETY? WITH A 3-4 ROUND GRADE?! All of the above arguments apply -- not a position of need, huge holes to fill, etc. Why not wait until the 3rd round? Why not Fili Moala or Paul Kruger? or Sean Smith if you have to go safety? Stunned.
Pick 64, Richard Quinn? A BLOCKING TE?! WITH A 4TH ROUND GRADE?! Can't you wait until the 3rd at least instead of wasting picks? Why do we need this when we have one of the best blocking TEs in the league in Graham? McDaniels really thinks this -- a blocking TE that will play in goal line sets only for the foreseeable future -- is a greater need than a NT or OLB, and worth trading up for. Simply incredible.
This offseason is like a bad dream. We've gone from having a dominant young QB leading a killer offense with proven brilliance at coach, to question marks at QB and the coach. We've gone from a flat terrible defense, with most issues stemming from the worst front 7 in Denver history to...virtually the same front 7 with a different scheme and one more player, and an upgraded secondary. Have we learned nothing the last years of good secondary with poor front 7 play? It's worthless to have that! We've traded a future first rounder -- a likely top 10 one -- and traded it for a mid 2nd round pick at a position not even a need.
HT is attempting to tell us that this somehow makes sense. I completely disagree. This draft and offseason shows ignorance of basic football principles like building strong lines first. The bizarre doubling of expensive FA signings, trading up at huge cost, and spending most of these high picks on positions not even near the highest need shows that there's been no plan at all, just huge overvaluation of certain skills and positions.
At least this isn't unprecedented -- overvaluation of certain positions and talents to the complete ignorance of more important needs is the trademark of a well known team: the Raiders. I can't even believe I just said that, but it's true. This draft and offseason is completely Raiders-esque.
I hope I'm wrong, but I see this team on a course for disaster. But I'm still a fan no matter how awful things are.
Go Broncos.
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
11 recs |
135 comments
Comments
-1
"Really, I'm a high-motor guy. Tough, hard-nosed, a hard runner, can make you miss at times. And just competitive. I love to play the game and I bring that energy to my team. So, we'll see how that goes." - Knowshon Moreno
Knowshon Moreno is the boss!
by stedtfeld on Apr 26, 2009 1:48 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
2 minutes to read the entire post, eh? Thanks for this well informed comment. :)
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 1:50 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
Maybe I’m just sick of hearing garbage about this being a bad off-season when we haven’t played a game yet…
"Really, I'm a high-motor guy. Tough, hard-nosed, a hard runner, can make you miss at times. And just competitive. I love to play the game and I bring that energy to my team. So, we'll see how that goes." - Knowshon Moreno
Knowshon Moreno is the boss!
by stedtfeld on Apr 26, 2009 1:53 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
no worries man
im tired of hearing what you said too. Sure, there’s football to be played, but that shouldn’t preclude reasoned analysis.
as I said above, when looked at as a whole, this offseason is a disaster of short sighted decisions. Might the players themselves pan out? Absolutely. But the team still has gigantic holes due to extreme mismanagement, and a future that’s been mortgaged for poor return.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 1:59 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stedfeld
You have it wrong. The offseason is NOT about playing games. It is about PREPARING to play games. Nobody is saying the 2009 season is not going well. They (and I) are saying that based on the Train Wreck that has been OFFSEASON, the 2009 season and (several of us fear) well beyond.
If that makes you sad, frustrated, angry, etc., don’t blame the good doctor, who is just laying out the facts. Blame Mr. Bowlen (for the numerous decisions that led us to this [seemingly dark] place) and McD (for being so obviously out of his depth this offseason).
Fact hurt sometimes, but it is better to face them then ignore them IMO.
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 26, 2009 7:22 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the point thedoctor is trying to make is...
After a few solid drafts in picking up enough offensive players to be a scary offense, a new season with Shanny at the helm looked pretty promising!!! there was a lot of fans who had high hopes that in this years draft and FA the Broncos could focus solely on the Defense and if they could go from bottom third to middle or top third in the league we would have a team that easily would be play-off bound. Now the reality sinks in, after demolishing the offense and shipping away a promising QB HCMcD seemingly didn’t address the most glaring holes of the team with the exception of Ayers. From his perspective the Broncos have gone from a team almost certainly play-off bound to a team that has a lot of question marks. I have to say I do understand his viewpoint.
Here are a few of my takes:
1) I do feel that it is really hard to say just how good any of these decisions are going to be yet. While we may not agree with all of his choices one thing you can say is HCMcD is a coach who is not afraid to make a call. I think this is a good thing. We’ll see
2) When you read the analysis on Alphonso Smith the guy was an outstanding QB in High School so he could be an emergency QB the way Rod was.
3) The knock on “Big Rich” is he didn’t have a lot of catches, but that didn’t mean he couldn’t they just didn’t use him that way.
There are more but I say let’s see how the preseason plays out, heck there were some who thought Royal was a weird pick last year. All of this does one thing for me, it has me excited to see how all of this is going to unwind as the season unfolds and while I am a “water is at the midpoint in the glass” kind of guy I do have some hope and can’t wait to watch the games.
by lovewatchinthegame on Apr 26, 2009 10:17 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry but
This is horrible logic. Every single thing the Broncos do is pure awesome until proven otherwise? Why? Just because they’re the Broncos?
You think they should get a pass just because they haven’t lost any games yet? Well they haven’t won any yet either. Your “Everything McD does is amazing until proven otherwise” mantra qualifies much more as “garbage” as the reasoned opinions thedoctor has put forth because your arguments are based on nothing more than blind faith in an unproven 33 year old who has never been a head coach on any level.
I hope I’m wrong. I pray I’m wrong. But IMHO in a few short months McD has set this franchise back at least 5 years (if we’re lucky) and maybe for much, much longer
by creamy on Apr 26, 2009 2:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
-1 is pretty informed considering the fact that you post is really just a long repetitive statement
“I tried to trust the Broncos, but they kept doing things that in my ‘expert’ opinion were not good for the team. Why didn’t they do what I wanted?” Repeat the last question several times over, and you have your post.
-1 for acting like a spoiled teen who has just been refused for the first time.
Maybe in all your years coaching at any level have led you to your truism that strong line = basic principle, but you haven’t shown me anything about your football knowledge that would cause me to take your bellyaching over HT’s well reasoned and informed peice.
Just because you have named yourself thedoctor, doesn’t mean that everything you say is a well reasoned statement. We get that your a whiner, do you have any info though?
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Apr 26, 2009 1:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Easy there Jibbons
Doc doesn’t like Kool Aid. You do. No reason to toss snark all over the place.
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 26, 2009 1:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ditto EG's comment
While I do not necessarily agree with all of Doc’s statements, it’s important that all of us show one another respect.
by BShrout on Apr 26, 2009 1:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
the post is meant to be a bit repetitive. it’s clear and repeated examples of the team showing no plan, and a complete lack of regard for basic football and team management principles. they’re not MY ideas, they’re common knowledge: pass rush and run stopping before secondary. don’t mortgage the future unless you think you’re close to a championship. don’t sign FAs to shore up a position and then draft starters there too. don’t draft your team’s strengths when you have glaring needs.
and what would you consider info, jibbons? me telling you that a blocking TE 2 rounds early is the GREATEST PICK EVAR?!
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 1:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'll have to agree to disagree
I admit that I tend to look on the optomistic side, but with a strong dose of realism. I think you have some great points, but as with many cases involving human beings two people can look at the same event and walk away with totally different understandings of what just occurred.
I think the basis for most of the disagreements I’ve read today have had more to do with our perception of the past than our understanding of why Coach McD is doing what’s he’s doing.
A couple of examples of places where we disagree. I think Mike Shanahan is a great coach. I’m not sure I can agree with the designation of him as the greatest offensive mind in football. Averaging 9 wins a seaon for the last 10 years, with only 4 post season appearances and 1 play-off win, don’t do much to support that image. The fact that we scored on less than 50% of our drives last year also creates problems for me in giving him that accolade. Being the only the 16th team in scoring and one of the worst offenses in turning the ball over also gives me fits when it comes to saying we had a killer offense. We marched up and down the field but didn’t score the majority of the time.
Unlike many, I believe that we did draft for need this year, just not the needs that everyone thought we would. Our running game was terrible last year so bolstering it with running backs and another blocking tight end makes sense. Do we need to pursue a quarterback? Not necessarily, we have two on the roster who have led their teams to the playoffs with far fewer weapons than Denver already has in place.
Should we have addressed the d-line. Sure we should have, and the beauty of it is that we still can since we have multiple picks in the last 5 rounds. Plus we started to address it by bringing in a NT who’s already had experience working with DC Nolan. Yet, we also needed to address the fact that our secondary ranked dead last in take aways last season. We’ve addressed that.
Ultimately though, there is no way that we can say that we had a successful or a disastrous draft until we see how the players come together, how they’re used, and finally until we’ve played out the 2009 season.
by BShrout on Apr 26, 2009 2:32 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
i appreciate the reasoned response, sir
greatest offensive mind in football, ok, maybe some hyperbole — though I’m far from the first to say it. How’s ONE OF the greatest offensive minds in football?
As I said, the picks may result in excellent players. The secondary was a need for sure. But it was a need already addressed in free agency. Why waste all that money on Hill and Goodman? RB wasn’t nearly the need, but we still are improved, no doubt. But why waste all that money on Buckhalter and Arrington? Why make horrific trades like the for the 37th when the players you’re reaching for aren’t anticipated to go for rounds! And most of all, why ignore the largest need of all when there was great value on the board at that very need?
Yes, we can address the dline in the lower rounds. But those rounds are long shots at best. We’re in all likelihood stuck with virtually the same guys plus some backups and a 1st round choice of a one year wonder in our front 7. I am in shock that they really believe ignoring the front 7 until the later rounds is at all the best course of action.
of course we will have to wait and see on the players, but we can still make reasoned evaluations of the priorities and the methods used to obtain the players — and they are shockingly bad. So bad, it reminds me of the Raiders. Have the Raiders picked good players? of course! but their inability to properly prioritize needs and avoid the temptation to mortgage the future dooms them to mediocrity. I fear we are headed there too (or worse!) under McDaniels based on this showing.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 2:56 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point-counterpoint
At least this dialog is proceeding along reasoned lines. I am more a doubter than a believer in the new young coach, but at this point we just need to let it all play out for a season or two. I believe some of the picks were good and others were reaches and abrupt gambling moves in the frenzy of the moment. Where the Broncos have fallen down in recent years is controlling the defensive line and I don’t see this improved in the draft thus far.
Maybe we will see a diamond in the rough emerge at this point, but I am still looking.
Still, this is fun debate, not name-calling, which at this point is very old news.
by Baltimore Bronco on Apr 26, 2009 11:22 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
you could very well be right
I agree that Coach S was a great coach who will undoubtedly end up in the Hall of Fame.
I agree that the majority of draft picks (no matter who’s picking them) tend to be rolls of the dice. Why add a running back? From what I’ve read, the system being installed relies heavily on situational backs as opposed to a single LT style workhorse back. So it would seem that greater depth is necessary.
I agree that the front 7 is a glaring need. Yet, I’ve read a lot of good things about our linebacking corp. So the most glaring need would seem to me to be the front 3. We acquired a NT through free agency with whom DC Nolan is familiar, which reduces the need to 2 quality DE’s. I’m also inclined to believe that Coach McD is taking a lot of advice from DC Nolan on who we should put into that 3-man line. And the choices appear to me to reflect the idea that DC Nolan believes he can create an effective D-line using the personnel that’s already in place. I’m also still firmly of the belief that bolstering the secondary is one of the best ways to support your d-line by making the opposing QB hold onto the ball longer before being able to find an open receiver and by taking away options with the potential for interceptions.
So far as the issue of mortgaging the future, I’m withholding judgment on that one for now. It seems to me that the fact that we still have a 1st round pick in 2010 is being overlooked. And if it is Chicago’s then it should be a relatively high pick, since just like Denver, I don’t see Chicago being able to fix all of their issues simply by adding Mr. Cutler. And would it be any more a case of mortgaging the future to trade picks to gain one or two d-line players now, while the majority of our secondary starters are viewed in many quarters as being on the downside of their careers?
by BShrout on Apr 26, 2009 11:36 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
shrug we’ll have to see. It’s seems unwise to hitch our wagon to a career backup and the worst front 7 in football. It seems unwise to count on an improved secondary causing more coverage sacks when QBs could have held on the the ball for 5-10s longer all year last year.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 12:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
why assume that Buckhalter and Arrington were brought in to compete for RB? They’re for depth at RB/KR/PR that’s 3-for-1 with each signing…that’s called cost effective, not wasting money. And do you think all these RB’s are gonna make the cut? of course not.
You also neglect how draft is setting us up to deal with next years FAs and possible retirements (TE, OL, S)…that’s not being short-sighted
not only McD building a team, he’s also “untying” shanny’s knots.
Rome wasn’t built in a day, but the Dolphin turned their team around in a year under Pennington, new coach, and new scheme (they beat us and our “#2” offense)…let’s reserve judgement for another day, especially the skeptisism.
you already know.
by justwhytee on Apr 26, 2009 4:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're right
about a lot of it. A couple of things I’ll respond to, since responding to everything would take me a long time and Day Two starts in just a few hours.
I hated the McDaniels hiring because it seemed like Bowlen was trying to find Shanahan 2.0. So much of it didn’t make sense, but I figured I was just biased because Shanny is “My guy”.
I think you mentioning Hillis and Torain as viable options would be a stretch. Neither stayed healthy last year and we certainly don’t want that revolving door at RB happening again. They are talented players, but I don’t see either of them as being a stud. Solid depth and varying styles to add some versatility, but I think the Moreno pick was a good one as it solidified the position. The guys we brought in as FAs will duke it out for roster spots and the cream will rise.
I think it said a lot to me that Orakpo dropped past a number of 3-4 teams and was eventually picked up by Washington. Sometimes, that conversion from 4-3 DE to 3-4 OLB/DE isn’t a pretty one, and it seems to me that teams were seeing him as a guy who wasn’t going to project positively in that kind of system and went with other players. I think he’s going to be solid in Washington, but not a star.
I think you’ve been far too hard on Ayers. Yes, he is small but it came out BEFORE we even drafted him that McDaniels wanted him to increase his playing weight from 270 range up to 285-290 area, which I think would shore up most of the size concerns. I think you calling him for being a one-year wonder is somewhat unfair because he was a solid rotational player for the Vols his junior season, who actually posted very similar numbers in his final two years in college.
I love the selection of Alphonso Smith, but I think giving up a first straight up for a second seems kind of crazy. That said, I think we might be okay getting away with it because we already have a first locked in for next year, so I don’t thinks it’s as large of a loss as it would be for a team with only one first to play with. From the sounds of it, the Broncos had given Smith a first round grade and they essentially used a first round pick on him but will pay him second round money. If he becomes an absolute stud for us, I doubt the frustration of this move will be around long.
You and I are in complete agreement about McBath and Quinn. I liked both players, but they were definite reaches imo and represented poor value. I like the Quinn pick more than the McBath pick because I think Quinn immediately becomes a red zone weapon and McBath at better players at his position still in front of him. Hopefully, McBath over William Moore turns out like Eddie Royal over DeSean Jackson did for us last season, but I’d really be surprised.
I think today was a solid day for the Broncos, but I think there are some very puzzling decisions that were made and I can only hope things turn out okay. If we just make the playoffs next season, I think the Smith trade turns out well. If it ends up being the 5th pick, well, oops.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 26, 2009 2:48 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
yes, Hillis and Torain were health risks, but weren’t they already backed up with 2 more solid guys from FA? the decision to take Moreno screams that McDaniels cannot make up his mind, and that’s extremely worrying.
again, it’s possible Orakpo had red flags as you say, though the entire draft community seemed extremely high on him, and he appeared to drop because of strange happenings at the top of the round more than teams passing in all places except the 11th. If they had only ignored the front 7 with just this pick, I’d be ok with it. Instead they continued to ignore the front 7, except for a pick in Ayers with far more red flags than Orakpo imo. One year starter?! Being counted on to gain 20 pounds and remain effective AND start? Massive character issues? Good lord, how can you NOT see Jarvis Moss 2.0? And he faces the same 4-3 → 3-4 conversion you mention!
We agree on Smith — I like him, I really do. But the trade was horrific, and the prioritization/ignoring of free agent signings jaw dropping. And oops is not good enough for me.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 3:11 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we saw the Moreno pick differently
and I fully admit my bias because on this very site back in January I openly talked about how much I loved the idea of Moreno at 12, and then to have it happen was an awesome moment for me. I think that was McDaniels just taking the BPA on his board and running with it. I am a big advocate of taking the guy with the most talent over drafting for need unless there’s a very, very obvious lack of need (Like had we drafted a WR or OT).
I really do see your concerns with Ayers. I have a lot of the same issues, but I’m not sure who you would have wanted drafted in that spot. When you get to the 18th pick, you aren’t going to find any clean prospects, so a chance has to be taken SOMEWHERE. Everette Brown was really the guy I wanted at that pick, but I didn’t see a major difference between him and Ayers.
I think an issue I had with Orakpo was a consistent failure of UT DL prospects to translate well to the pros after making lots of big plays and getting fat stats and pub from playing mediocre OL in the Big 12. When Orakpo came up against the big uglies for TTU last year, he got shut down. If I remember correctly, he got hurt at some point, but before that happened his effectiveness was zilch.
Ayers putting on all that weight and remaining effective will be interesting. I think expecting him to start right away will be a little too much, especially since we have to see what Moss, Doom, and Crowder (another UT disappointment) can give us at the position.
Oops is never good enough when given so much time to prepare for this, but after moves have been made you can’t really do much except hope they pan out. I think you’re placing too much emphasis on the signings of Goodman and Hill as reasons not to draft the guys we did because after those players, we’re left with last year’s lot. That means there’s basically zero depth, and as the game has evolved, it’s been shown that unless your CBs go at LEAST 3 deep, you’re going to have problems. I think now our secondary looks promising and has the depth to make up for some injuries.
You know what the Smith trade reminds me of? The Foote trade. A team is obviously overpaying for someone they value highly, and if it doesn’t work out (Like the Foote trade this season), it’s going to get hammered. Last season, though, went Foote got the D in order and really got Clark straightened out, they were playing well and we made a little noise in the playoffs. If Smith turns out to have the kind of impact Foote had, I think in the end we’ll be okay with the trade. And obviously, go Avs. Hedman ftw.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 26, 2009 3:27 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, BPA is totally fine by me, if that’s what we were trying to do. Seriously, I was getting excited about Crabtree if he’d slipped to 12 — he’s an insane talent worth overriding need. I didn’t feel that way about Moreno, but I can understand how others might.
But McDaniels said we were balancing need and BPA many times though. And if we were doing BPA, why in the world would we pull the bizarre sequence of reaches and awful trades in the 2nd round? It just doesn’t make sense!
I felt we had to exit this draft with 3 new defensive starters in the front 7 to be competitive, and that we had a good chance at pulling that off. I suppose it could still happen with low round finds, but if that’s what we’re counting on … :O
Duchene all the way buddy. :)
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 3:43 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
As exciting as this draft is
I think the other one coming up in June is going to be crazy awesome.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 26, 2009 3:52 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
honestly it’s hard to get nearly as involved in the NHL draft for me, because i don’t have any way to follow potential draftees like i do with football. I basically read prospect reports, and say hey cool…
But I am excited for that top pick. Hedman, Duchene, Tavares…a superstar is coming to Colorado! And there’s virtually no way it’s not at a position of need! :)
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 3:55 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
After the first round, it's not as cool
for the reasons you mentioned, but Hedman is going to look great in a unipron.
I’d take Olivier Roy in the second, but the namesake might add to the pressure, you know?
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 26, 2009 3:59 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hockey in my City!
Went to a terrific hockey game on Friday night in Washington and saw a fight break out, this time with a grumpy coach and a water bottle thrown into the crowd. What an idiot and this guy is an Olympic coach! Theodore blew the first game, continuing his anxious ineptitude in Stanley Cup play.
But, should be a fun game today in New York. Those Ranger fans will be wild!
by Baltimore Bronco on Apr 26, 2009 11:26 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My theory on Moreno pick
I like Moreno and I have no problem with the pick but it did seem like we had other options that could have helped the D. But I have a theory on why it occured bear with me. When we signed all those FA RB’s when we had Cutler and thought we’d still have Cutler. The fiasco occurs Cutler wants out and we oblige. McD now feels the need for a stud RB to help control the clock and compensate for the loss at QB. That could explain why we draft a RB after signing three. As for addressing the secondary…The only possible explanation could be that the FO saw our inability to create turnovers as a giant weakness. I think today they will fill depth and talent at the LB and DLine. Analysis and opinion are always great but I think we need to wai until the drafts completely over before we judge the full story.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Apr 26, 2009 7:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crying can be therapeutic..
All these posts dripping with pessimism.. Let it all out people!
Hopefully the front office will set up a 1-800# soon so we can all call in and tell them how they should be running their organization.
Peace!
by BringBackOrange on Apr 26, 2009 2:54 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Smart aleck
You would think with the good, reasoned comments above that this kind of nasty comment would be unnecessary. No, some people just cannot resist themselves.
by Baltimore Bronco on Apr 26, 2009 11:27 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look.
“I was stunned at first, but as more info came out and I considered the past, it made sense.”
I get the feeling that people that feel as you do right now wil be singing this same tune about the entire offseason soon enough. As I’ve said elsewhere before, our offense was middle of the pack last season. Forget the yards mark; games are won with points. And the defense, well, until we know who will play where and see them perform on the field, how do you know what we have and don’t have? Perhaps, as has been suggested before, many guys will blossom in the 3-4 where they struggled in the 4-3. McDaniels and Company have had the opportunity to put their guys through the paces and they obviously determined a few things: 1) they thought the guys the chose where better for the team than Orakpo at #12, Matthews at #18 and Maualuga/Brace/Gilbert/etc. in the 2nd round. You, in your infinite wisdom and experience in pro football might not agree because the scouting reports you read online or the video clips you saw on TV convinced you otherwise, but that’s why we’re fans and they’re running a professional football franchise. I’m not telling you to be psyched, but to be angry or disappointed is foolish. If you’d like, be dubious. Hell, I was about Eddie Royal, Ryan Harris and many others over the years. But I’ve learned my lesson: the NFL Draft is not an exact science and the people calling the shots often times have better information than I do. Personally, I like the prospects we got even if some think we reached to varying degrees for them. Actually, it appears that almost everyone likes the prospects we got and management feels they will all make an impact as rookies. Give it time, think about it some more and you’ll come around. I know you will. We all do, sooner or later.
"The mystic chords of fandom, stretching from every trade and signing to every active account and guest all over this broadband, will yet swell the chorus of union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature". ~ Abraham Lincoln-ish
"The tree of victory must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of quarterbacks and coaches". ~ Thomas Jefferson-ish
by ejruiz on Apr 26, 2009 3:39 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
good god man, paragraphs!
consider me extremely dubious then. i don’t know as much about football as them I’m sure, but I sure seem to have a better grasp of some basics: pass rush and run stopping are far, far more important than anything else on defense. These players may be great, really, but the priorities they reveal are shockingly off. Secondary comes AFTER your front 7.
Also, that out of context quote isn’t indicative of my thesis: yes, many of these moves make some sense in microcosm and can be rationalized as I did with that move, but when viewed in the big picture this team has gone backwards pure and simple. the priorities of the front office resemble those of the Raiders — short-sighted and ignorant of basic football principles.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 3:50 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Short And Sweet.
Let me quote myself:
And the defense, well, until we know who will play where and see them perform on the field, how do you know what we have and don’t have? Perhaps, as has been suggested before, many guys will blossom in the 3-4 where they struggled in the 4-3. McDaniels and Company have had the opportunity to put their guys through the paces and they obviously determined a few things: they thought the guys the chose where better for the team than Orakpo at #12, Matthews at #18 and Maualuga/Brace/Gilbert/etc. in the 2nd round.
Perhaps that point got lost in my block of text, so I highlight it here because you seem to have missed it entirely. You view the lack of focus on the front seven as an oversight on their part, while I see it as a vote of confidence for the current roster. They must have seen something from the mini-camps that led them to believe that they may well have what they need up front already. Or at least they viewed the options you believe they overlooked as not representing significant enough upgrades to merit their selections. You may disagree, but until we see how this plays out, it’s just your amateur opinion against their professional one, so forgive for siding with them for now. If it fails, then I’ll be right with you, but right now they’re getting the benefit of the doubt from me.
"The mystic chords of fandom, stretching from every trade and signing to every active account and guest all over this broadband, will yet swell the chorus of union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature". ~ Abraham Lincoln-ish
"The tree of victory must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of quarterbacks and coaches". ~ Thomas Jefferson-ish
by ejruiz on Apr 26, 2009 4:06 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
i did lose that in the wall o’ text (and the fact that I’m insomniacing and exhausted for reasons unknown), and that’s a valid take on things.
I find it hard to believe that a scheme will fix everything though. The current players were selected/signed for a 4-3 in the first place! Honestly, isn’t it a little naive and wishful to think the worst front 7 in football will magically improve with the addition of a different scheme, a conversion project in Ayers, a backup NT in Fields, and some late round rookies? that’s nearly as crazy as the Raiders thinking DHB will fix their offense, imo.
Trust me, I too want the current players to succeed, but I’m not as willing to lay aside logic for my wishes. I’d much rather have injected talent into that front 7 rather than reaching for secondary and offensive players we barely even need.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 4:18 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
To be fair
I think it would be unwise to overlook the impact I think Nolan is going to make. Slowik had proven to be a failure as a DC before, and when he failed with us, it wasn’t a huge shock. Nolan has a track record of very successful defenses playing for him and I think the sheer improvement in coaching alone is going to have a noticable impact on how we play defense. Scheme changes are always a little difficult, but I think there’s a renewed enthusiasm this year and a new attitude will help. Talent is obviously very important, but I think sometimes the coaching can be just as detrimental (See: Avalanche, Colorado) as a dearth of sheer ability. I put my faith in Nolan and I have an funny feeling he had some input on which guys were picked.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 26, 2009 4:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
all we can do is hope for this, i guess. i still have my doubts that coaching will have as great an effect as we need to even be middle of the road again. but maybe.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 4:51 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Points guys
After all we’re no more than passionate fans that love to play fantasy GM. As much information and analysis we think we can come up with, we’ll never know the full story and we’ll never get to see what the GMs and Coaches in this league do. I am by nature a little skeptical of things but heck, these guys are getting paid to make decisions and to know what they’re doing and I’ll reluctantly choose to trust their judgment over anybody’s who’s not there every day.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Apr 26, 2009 7:50 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair Points.
I appreciate that you seem to be taking a more reasoned approach than most others who hate the decisions made by management this offseason and specifically on the first day of the draft.
I honestly cannot tell you who is in the mix to fill out our starting front seven at the moment, so it’s tough to say where we may need help. If the guys right around 300 will become DEs, then we have Thomas, Powell, Peterson, Clemons, Askew and McBean, plus maybe Crowder and Reid, as options there. The two guys significantly over 300, Fields and Parker, would be candidates for the NT position unless undersized guys like Powell and Thomas are to be considered as well. An LB corps of four out of Williams, Davis, Larsen, Woodyard, Bailey, Haggan and Green, plus Ayers, Dumervil, Crowder and Reid is available. Some of those guys aren’t really options, I’m sure, but I could imagine an alignment that would be plenty talented and well-suited for the 3-4. They’re all puzzle pieces that fit together to form a nice picture, I just don’t know which go where yet.
"The mystic chords of fandom, stretching from every trade and signing to every active account and guest all over this broadband, will yet swell the chorus of union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature". ~ Abraham Lincoln-ish
"The tree of victory must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of quarterbacks and coaches". ~ Thomas Jefferson-ish
by ejruiz on Apr 26, 2009 4:50 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am also excited about Powell as a 34 end — if he’s healthy. all the guys you mention are certainly candidates.
The real question is are they GOOD players? I don’t doubt that they’re warm bodies that might project here or there in this new scheme. But how can we be confident about a group of players that failed so miserably last year and has nothing but unproven question marks added?
Frankly, most of those guys have been and are probably backups and rotational players on an even mediocre defense on the basis of pure talent. Only Thomas, Dumervil, and Williams have shown more with any consistency, and that was in a 4-3 — there’s the question of whether even they can translate to a 3-4. Guys like Powell, Larsen, Woodyard, Ayers — all possibilities, but even larger question marks at the same time.
Well put together NFL teams don’t have this kind of bald-faced risk through the entire front 7. They wouldn’t even begin to tolerate it, especially when they had a golden opportunity to add more talent like the Broncos did yesterday.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 5:07 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly.
I think we agree more than we might think. We see question marks along the front seven, you worry (rightfully so) and I’m hopeful (perhaps miguidedly so). I’m just not sure that a lot of the options available to us yesterday were much more than that. I’m not sure who was taken that we could have gotten that would either not be converting to a 3-4 for the first time or was that sure of a thing in that scheme to begin with.
The new regime is certainly gambling with the current front seven and whatever else they’re able to get today, but they aren’t doing it like drunk tourists at a roulette table. They’ve had time to assess their players and those available in the draft, making the judgement to proceed as they have. I’m willing to let it run its course before passing scathing judgement myself and I hope you, as an obviously reasonable and thoughtful fan will too.
I enjoyed this conversation and look forward to many future ones as well. Thanks for taking the time and putting in thr effort that you did here. Go Broncos!
"The mystic chords of fandom, stretching from every trade and signing to every active account and guest all over this broadband, will yet swell the chorus of union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature". ~ Abraham Lincoln-ish
"The tree of victory must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of quarterbacks and coaches". ~ Thomas Jefferson-ish
by ejruiz on Apr 26, 2009 5:15 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
it would have been simple to add more talent to the front 7, even just assuming the same moves we made:
- Orakpo at 12.
- Moreno at 18 (trust me, he’d have been here)
- Brace at 37
- Kruger at 48
- keep the 3rd rounders.
i enjoyed this as well. i’ll revisit this post after the season, be watching for it.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 5:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Moreno Would Have Been Gone at 16
To San Diego
by NYCBronx on Apr 26, 2009 7:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
a team with huge contracts owed to 2 RBs already for next year? I don’t see it.
Oh well, we’ll never know for certain.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 9:03 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Eagles.
They traded up for Maclin and would have done the same for Moreno. In fact, I’d guess that the move up for Maclin was a desperation move because their top target was already off the board. Note that they jumped on Shady McCoy in the second…
"The mystic chords of fandom, stretching from every trade and signing to every active account and guest all over this broadband, will yet swell the chorus of union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature". ~ Abraham Lincoln-ish
"The tree of victory must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of quarterbacks and coaches". ~ Thomas Jefferson-ish
by ejruiz on Apr 26, 2009 5:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm...
I believe every one of those guys would be making the conversion to the 3-4, no? And I don’t see any of those guys as can’t miss prospects in that scheme, either. Don’t get me wrong, I like them plenty as prospects, but they’re no sure things. Time will tell.
"The mystic chords of fandom, stretching from every trade and signing to every active account and guest all over this broadband, will yet swell the chorus of union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature". ~ Abraham Lincoln-ish
"The tree of victory must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of quarterbacks and coaches". ~ Thomas Jefferson-ish
by ejruiz on Apr 26, 2009 5:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, just can't agree....
“when viewed in the big picture this team has gone backwards pure and simple”
We just don’t have enough to go on to make effective analysis of these draft picks for a number of reasons:
I think that in addition to our generally being at an extreme disadvantage vis a vis the FO in terms of their information and insight levels, not to mention the amount of time the FO people spend in looking over draft prospects, few of us have any understanding of what the Broncos have now in terms of talent for the systems that are going to be used. Given the change to a 3-4 and the new FAs, are any of us confident in knowing what are needs really are at this point and who would best fill them?
Also, I think that we are looking only two dimensionally at what we perceive to be talent levels of individuals. My sense, and I think the point of other more optimistic comments elsewhere, is that there is a third dimension – that of building a team with a specific attitude and (I word I use a lot in describing the new regime) discipline. This will be less obvious, and much harder for us to ever understand. (For example, was Cutler really liked and was he really a leader INSIDE the locker room? Hard to say at this point, though I was a huge JC fan.)
None of this is intended to criticize anyone for trying to make a rational analysis – it’s what I love best about MHR – and the points raised above are good points, whether I agree with all of them or not. Good post.
Bottom line, though, I think this team will be vastly superior to the teams we have fielded recently. Teams who seemed to lack identity and, I’m sorry, but also character. Great individual efforts here and there, Royale, Hillis, Clady, even Cutler at times, but I was never able to locate the team chemistry and in the end, I never trusted them not to break my heart. And I got tired of that.
If the team loses during this next very tough season, I am prepared for it – but I want a team that I feel played their guts out – team-wide – every game. Falling flat on our asses and then not really getting back to a standing position by the end of games with the Chargers, Chiefs and – god forbid! – the Raiders – I just can’t take that again.
by dwinjapan on Apr 26, 2009 8:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on your last paragraph
Well said.
by topnation on Apr 26, 2009 1:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
as dubious as you are about the Broncos picks you have to ecstatic about the blunders the Raiders have made
by lovewatchinthegame on Apr 26, 2009 10:25 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
if thats the best we have i am very sad.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 11:09 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
by the way
please do rec this post — even if you don’t agree with me even a little, I think this is a great discussion that should be continued and read by all.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 5:16 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I rec'd it for this reason.
Whether people agree with the original post, the following discussion has really carried on well. It’d be nice to see it continued a bit further.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Apr 26, 2009 5:20 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is the kind of discourse...
… I come to MHR to find. After all the naysayers, flamers and McD haters that showed up last night, this is really refreshing.
The Shanahan firing, McD hiring and Cutler kerfuffle are water under the bridge as far as I am concerned. We can rehash them all we want, but we wont really know the impact for a couple of years.
As to yesterday’s draft, I agree we need to adddress the front 7, especially NT, and to a lesser extent ILB and DE. But after Jackson and Raji were gone, not sure there was any other 1st round talent at those positions. Orakpo will probably be a very good DE in the Skins 43 scheme, but not sure he would fit as well in the 34. I liked Brace, but there are other NTs available today that are not that much of a fall off. Same can be said at ILB.
My mock had RB, DE, CB and S as the top 4 picks – different guys, same slots – then filling in some beef in the later rounds. Maybe I am as ignorant of basic football pronciples as McD, but that is how I saw it.
Again thnx to all for a legitmate debate instead of name calling. Definitely rec’d.
by DCbroncfan on Apr 26, 2009 6:57 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Perfect Post and great discussion
Doc, great well reasoned and rational take. I felt like writing something similar last night but I finished watching at around midnight (I DVRed the draft and watched it after the family was in bed) and probably couldn’t have matched your post anyway.
For what it is worth, I agree on all fronts. I obviously hope everything turns up roses with these picks (hard for me to imagine we’ll see value trading away our #1, but here’s hoping), but the trend we’ve seen this offseason is unmistakable.
I challenge ANYONE to make a legitimate argument that we are better off as a team (read: our immediate and long-term prospects are better) than we were following the chargers loss. All I ever hear in that vein is “McD has a plan” and “Mr. Bowlen knows what he’s doing” and “McD is a great offensive mind”. But nobody ever points to HOW we’ve improved other than to say we got rid of a recently unproductive (Super Bowl winning) coach and an immature (Pro Bowl) QB.
Honestly, at the end of last season I think most anyone would have been a "buyer" of the Broncos – great short and long-term prospects with its best years in front of it. How about now? Total flipping question mark. It is not out of the realm of possibility that we could be good, but I find it hard to believe any outsider would say that we’ve improved.
I swear that sometimes I feel like I’m in Jamestown watching in horror as Jim Jones passes out the Kool Aid.
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 26, 2009 8:03 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Great discussion
It is perfectly reasonable for all fans to be anxious at this point. I think we are all uncomfortable with the amount of change and uncertainty this great organization is dealing with. We are used to one thing above all things over the last 15 years – stability at the top. Regardless of what moves were made, we could take comfort in knowing the braintrust at the top was a constant. We parlayed our success in the 90s into a sense of trust in the leadership and the perception around the NFL that we were one of the top organizations.
Losing the faces of our team (Shanny and Cutler) in a matter of months and replacing them with unknown quantities is unsettling to say the least. I think it is natural then to question every move this regime makes until we see a product that can compete and win.
I do think Moreno is a star prospect and will make us better immediately. I do think we have vastly improved our secondary and made that a strength out of a weakness. The QB situation remains to be seen in my opinion, but I think we can win with Kyle Orton. Day 1 of the draft yielded 5 players that can contribute in 2009 and in that sense we are better in terms of quality depth at multiple positions. The goal of any draft is to find the best players for your team. That includes productivity first, but also character and attitude. I think we have improved the team from December in that we have a better coaching staff from top to bottom, and the culture of entitlement is gone from Dove Valley.
The players quit on their coach the last month of the 2008 season and it remains to be seen what the character of the 2009 version will be. But, we have added a lot of reasonably priced veteran leadership (who can still play BTW) and added some great value picks yesterday that improve the team as well.
I too am concerned about what has been done to address the front seven, but I am happy to see the FO stick to the best available philosophy in round one. Round two was confusing to me in that we traded a lot of picks to get Smith and Quinn. If they are players 5 years from now, no one will remember what we gave up to get them. But, I admit, that is a big if right now.
by 5280FT on Apr 26, 2009 8:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
5280...good post......
I can only speak for myself, but I am not anxious in the least.
I love Shanny, and I thank him, but I am VERY glad he is gone. Too many years in the same place brings status quo and staleness.
Cutler: Great talent but not the quality or type of guy I want representing our franchise. I ALWAYS had doubts on his character and demeanor…..never of his talent…..
I LOVE our picks this draft, and the direction the team is going.
Once again, just my opinion, but this is the mostt confident I have felt in the team since 98.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 26, 2009 8:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
for the record
I am glad Shanny is gone and I also like a great deal of what has happened this offseason. I am excited for 2009 and like that many pundits think we will be a 5 win team – I love that as an optimistic fan. i like the shake up and new direction.
My point was that I understand why many are anxious.
by 5280FT on Apr 26, 2009 9:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Get it man...no problems.....I was replying to your post with my opinion...great job and thanks for the post!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 26, 2009 9:11 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks boydy
here’s to some gems on day 2
by 5280FT on Apr 26, 2009 9:20 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.....all the guys that have come off the board in the 3rd were guys I did not like for our team....so things are looking good..
Hoping for Brinkley and Terrance Taylor….Stephen McGee…….Sammie Lee Hill……Everette pedescleaux…..Bardeen just cae off the board…he would have been good!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 26, 2009 9:24 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, we didn’t get any of them. How’s another safety, a tiny WR, and a OG that’s a terrible fit in the ZB system! whoo!
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 12:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Challenge
Ghost – that challenged has been been answered many times on many previous posts. But, from your tone I’d guess that you wouldn’t buy any of the arguments anyways.
Perhaps it was Shanahan passing you the Kool Aid?
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan "press on" has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race" Calvin Coolidge
by SSMT on Apr 26, 2009 1:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Think You Have it Backward
You claim that your concerns revolve around near sighted decisions but I see the opposite. Most of your concerns stem from last year. We had an explosive offense, we had a bad front seven, so you are looking for fixes to that team. This is no longer that team. This is a team being built for a different plan and a different scheme for the future. These picks play to that plan not fixing what we saw last year.
We can’t say the front 7 will be as bad as they were last year because it isn’t the same front seven. The scheme is new, the players are new, and the players that aren’t new are being used in a new way. I think it is going to be very different from what we have seen.
Aside from that most of your offseason analysis has been addressed and rehashed numerous times on this website. I suggest you read back over the posts of Bear and HT and Styg and others to find the answers to those questions. Assuming that you want to know the answers.
Don't jump off the cliff but if the guys next to you are loud and annoying try to push them off.
by Kfustud on Apr 26, 2009 8:29 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
100% great take K....this is not the 2008 Broncos....THANK GOD!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 26, 2009 8:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well said, Kf
-Harvey J. Neptune
"Practice doesn't make perfect. PERFECT practice makes perfect." - Vince Lombardi
by HarvJNep2n on Apr 26, 2009 11:49 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
no, this is the same front seven returning with only a few exceptions. I realize it’s a new scheme, but how can you think players that were picked for ability in an entirely different one will magically improve in a new one? If anything, won’t they struggle as the new scheme doesn’t fit their skill sets?
The scheme may have changed, but the lack of individual talent remains, and may even be worse. You’re welcome to pretend that coaching and scheme is vastly more important than talent, but I’ll have the same questions about your football knowledge I have about the Broncos.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 12:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Doc, I can tell you’re getting angry as our “draft” progresses today. I can’t say that I blame you though. My kingdom for some front 7 help, eh?
At the very least, your post and the subsequent comments have heartened me a little because now I know that I’m not alone. One likes to have company when hurtling over the cliff, right?
It is a cold comfort; however, I’ll take what I can get at the moment.
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 26, 2009 12:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, I wouldn’t say I’m angry. It’s more of a mirthless laughter with each pick as my worst fears about the Broncos are confirmed.
if you’re in FC we oughta grab a beer at jackson’s sometime and share our misery, heh.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 12:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Front 7
Well this isn’t really the same front seven. Yes there are a lot of returning players, as of now, but even if they are retained they will be used differently. Consider Doom, a good pass rusher but undersized on the line which exposed Denver to the run. In transition to the 3-4 he has the potential to take advantage of his ability to pass rush but is also now playing up and behind the D-line which will take the brunt of the run attack. Same player but he is being taken advantage of in an entirely different way and one that potentially can play to his strengths.
This isn’t to say it is a sure thing that he can make the transition to standing and back peddling but that is what the first mini camp was trying to evaluate. Doom isn’t the only player that this applies to, now many of our smaller but faster D lineman who might naturally have been considered tweeners could be just what you want in the new scheme.
So although for many on paper it may look like we haven’t made big changes we really have. We also have two new NTs that really haven’t been seen in Denver or used, due to injury. We just drafted a big DE… there are lots of changes.
Don't jump off the cliff but if the guys next to you are loud and annoying try to push them off.
by Kfustud on Apr 26, 2009 1:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree Doom could really excel in the 3-4. heck, Moss might even be worth something as an OLB. But we have no idea, and neither do our coaches until games are played. what we do know is that the front 7 needed more talent.
and our 2 NTs are castoffs. the DE is a conversion project that must add 20 lbs to be effective at the position they want him at. they’re certainly changes, but for the better? that’s pretty doggone hard to say.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, we don’t know that they needed more talent. What we are seeing is that there is a strong feeling that the talent wasn’t being taken advantage of in the best way. In fact when you look through many of our players they have exceptional “talent” but were frustrating in their inability to perform.
The NT isn’t a cast off, he was brought here specifically by Nolan who knew him. You can certainly question McD as a young unknown coach but Nolan has rebuilt and built at least two defenses in recent memory and is tried and true in stopping the run.
The easiest thing to stare at this offseason was our front seven so it is no surprise that everyone is concerned about it. However, when you really analyze the different methodology the 3-4 takes to stopping the run and pass rushing versus the 4-3 I can see where the coaches would be enthused with the talent there. At least to perform adequately that they feel they can add to the team in many areas. Something they are doing for a longer term objective that trying to patchwork anything people feel needed it now.
So conclusion, we don’t know how many of our guys or the draft guy will or would have performed in our 3-4. Honestly if anything we know more about our current guys than the draftees so it makes sense to me that they would take those odds unless really concerned.
Don't jump off the cliff but if the guys next to you are loud and annoying try to push them off.
by Kfustud on Apr 26, 2009 1:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
you seem to be arguing that there’s no point to even trying to evaluate talent outside of games, or diagnose needs in a new scheme before games are played.
I disagree. Certainly we won’t know for sure until games are played, but I think we can see red flags coming at least, and question the complete lack of plan this draft.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 2:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have no idea where you came to that conclusion. I am saying there is uncertainty in both the players moving to the new scheme and the players in the draft. I also feel that of these two groups we know more about the guys who were at the mini camp and with the team last year.
You throw red flags because you think we didn’t take defensive lineman or linebackers, a weakness in our team last year. However, I would say that the obvious thing to do would have been to draft lots of front seven players but what message would that have said? That there was no faith in our front seven and it needed a total change. I think this is a more promising message coming from the team. That they have confidence that these guys can and will work well together next year and it isn’t as hopeless as many might have thought.
I find it exciting. As for your last comment, lack of plan. Nothing could be further from the truth, if anything the fact that they moved up so often meant they had a big plan for this draft. They knew exactly who they wanted and went to get them. What you should be saying is that the coaches plan isn’t what your plan was. That is probably true but something I am not worried about.
Don't jump off the cliff but if the guys next to you are loud and annoying try to push them off.
by Kfustud on Apr 26, 2009 3:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Thedoctor and Elways Ghost....
Thanks fro your passion, and first and foremost, I believe that we are all passionate fans and want the Broncos to succeed.
I am not going to get into a debate, as we CLEARLY see things WAY differently.
I LOCE our off season, I am STOKED on our draft, and I think the hiring of McDaniels was a master stroke.
In the last 5 years (bar last years draft) I was SICK TO DEATH of Shanahan flushing the draft down the toilet, making CRAPPY decisons on FA and Draft picks.
His caoching ws uninspired as was his hiring of staff.
This year, it is refreshing having a definitive plan, and that our team has chosen guys that the fit the mold of what they are looking for.
We will agree to disagree, but discourse provides great discussion.
Thanks for the opinions, and lets remember to ALL support the team first and foremsot!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 26, 2009 8:34 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I would have written this...
I just couldn’t force myself to sit down and revisit the traumatic events. I have a terrible feeling we’re going to draft John Parker Wilson in the next round.
by DukeTC on Apr 26, 2009 9:01 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
The only problem !
That I still cant come to gripps with is trading next years # 1 pick for a #2 The broncos
did not have to do that Other than that I am still letting things play out . Waiting for
the season to start and the games to be played.
by broncosfaninphilly on Apr 26, 2009 9:24 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thedoctor I couldn't agree more
I love the Moreno pick I feel in the last few years teams had no respect for our running game in the red zone. I would have loved to see what Cutler could have done with a RB like Moreno behind him.
I was very impressed with Ayers in the Senior Bowl. I thought he was clearly the best DL in that game. What worries me is that he only has 8 career sacks and if the plan is to play him inside he needs to get stronger 18 reps at 225 shows he needs to get into the weight room.
McDaniels has me scratching my head on his decision making. He’s going to have to earn my respect. Going into this season there are tons of question marks. I’m sure McDaniel’s has a plan but there are 31 other coaches that have a plan as well an who’s to say his is better than anyone else’s. The bottom line is that he must win and win now.
by mrwhite20 on Apr 26, 2009 9:30 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
That is going to be the "What if" for the ages all season.
No matter how good the Broncos become, how much BETTER would they have been with Cutler at the helm? Then it becomes a “talent vs. leadership” debate.
-Harvey J. Neptune
"Practice doesn't make perfect. PERFECT practice makes perfect." - Vince Lombardi
by HarvJNep2n on Apr 26, 2009 11:46 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is kind of funny really
Is now really the time to be reasonable? Since when has the immediate aftermath of the draft been the time when reasonable assessment can be made about any team and its picks?
What I read here is you all getting emotional (depressed, angry, etc.) about your supposed “reasonable” analysis. The truth is, no matter how much insight you think you have about the players we drafted, or didn’t draft, history has shown that the strong majority of players drafted are not sure-fire anything. Any extreme response right now is not really called for — provisionalism is the only warranted response.
And I think this applies to early evaluations of McD & Xanders also. What’s clear here is that McD has his own interpretation of players’ values — including first and foremost QBs values. It’s not hard to connect the dots here and see how his experience with a no-name QB at the time — Cassel — and turning him into a highly valued QB, could reinforce McD’s idea that sheer talent is not the only factor in a QB’s success. What I mean is, McD saw something in Cassel when the rest of the NFL didn’t, and then proved that whatever he saw could in fact be developed into success.
McD’s unorthodox vision of talent and system is certainly on the line, and will eventually lead to his success or failure (or mediocrity). But regardless, to say that we all are in position to judge that vision without a game under his belt is pretty damn trigger-fingery. Calm down.
Y’all are trying to be “reasonable” without accurate premises to begin with. We cannot see what McD is working with right now, as far as what he sees. I’m certain that no analysis right now will prove accurate in the long run. The info we have is incomplete enough that “reason” is a hokey-pokey process. Truly reasonable people will conclude that they don’t have enough info.
by ZooTown on Apr 26, 2009 9:33 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
it's ALWAYS the time to be reasonable
You’ve missed me completely. I have zero problem with the players besides Ayers. All of these players could turn out awesome and nothing would make me happier at this point. It’s the philosophy behind this offseason’s moves that I am analyzing and taking issue with.
It’s almost completely ignoring your greatest area of need, the front 7. It’s signing 3 FA RBs and then drafting another with your top pick. It’s signing all kinds of DBs and then stacking more there in the draft. It’s making horrible trades. It’s making horrific reaches AND trading up for those reaches. It’s 4 months of one step backwards for two steps forward and then destroying the two steps forward with the next move. That’s what I take issue with.
I reject that we cannot see what McDaniels is working with. Of course we can! They’re not supermen! This crap that we have to trust them is a mind-boggling appeal to authority; a complete logical fallacy. If anyone needs to examine their premises, it’s you. Being a fan is more than blindly following your organizations leadership.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 9:45 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not saying we have to trust them and their "authority"
I’m not calling for blind faith. But by the same token, it’s not time to sound the alarms.
Sure, try to be reasonable, but recognize the limits of your conclusions (or anybody elses, for that matter) — they are very preliminary and almost certainly useless.
If Alphonso Smith proves himself to be a very good CB, then we’ll have to look back and say, “hmm, yeah, guess McD & X knew what they were doing, and that was a good trade.” Draft evaluations are so much of a crapshoot that we really need time before we can see the merit (or lack of) in McD/X’s evaluations.
As far as seeing what McD & X are working with: I disagree. They have info we do not. We don’t see these players first-hand. We don’t go to the owners meetings and get vibes about which players might be traded or might be cut after June 1. We don’t know which players have motivation problems, intelligence issues, etc. Sure, we can draw conclusions based on the info we do have, but along with that, we need to recognize the limitations of those conclusions.
by ZooTown on Apr 26, 2009 10:11 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
it IS time to sound the alarm. We’re halfway through the second day and nary a front 7 pick in sight! We’re trading up for WRs, a position you can’t possibly seriously be hoping to improve anything but depth at, while cast-offs from other teams loom as starters on D!
Our evaluations of talent may not mean much until games hit, sure, but the plan can be questioned just fine. And this “plan” is completely inscrutable.
Even if Smith turns out to be the next coming of Champ Bailey, I will still not understand why we have failed to improve our pass rush and run stopping. Hell, we HAVE Champ Bailey and he’s been mostly wasted for years because there’s no pass rush or run stoppage!
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 12:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your Arguments
Doc,
Respect your thoughts but I want to address not your critique of our draft but the first paragraph or two of your post because I think that really sums up what you are trying to argue and where your disappointment really stems from.
I agree, our defense was awful but how long can you blame the D-Coordinators? In 2006 we had a Defense that was setting records and then Coyer was let go because of differences with Shanahan. So, we played Defensive Coordinator Musical Chairs for three years without addressing players. We also neglected the fact that the Head coach was as much part of the problem as the D-Coordinator.
Your answer to that problem was to get yet another defensive coordinator and we would be Super Bowl Bound even though that tactic had failed miserably?
You say we had the best young QB in football. I’m not going to pile on Cutler – but that is patently false. In fact, we didn’t even have the best young QB in our division (and this is not said with any love for Rivers). Matt Ryan is a better QB in my opinion and that of most football minds. Cutler would NOT have made the Pro Bowl if the voting had been done at the end of regular season versus one month prior to that. Cutler certainly had potential. He had impressive physical gifts, but, at this point, that was it.
We also did NOT have the best offensive mind in football. At one time that was the case. But, to me, offense is putting up points. By definition we had an average offensive mind. McDaniels is arguably a better offensive mind.
I could go on addressing some of your points but you end your post reluctantly comparing our draft to the Raiders and that you see this team on a course for disaster.
When will the naysayers finally admit that the last 3 years were a disaster? Too many blowouts to mention, character issues, constant blame being put on subordinates without the head coach/personnel man being held accountable, passionless play and passionless coaches equal an average organization – which is exactly what we had become.
What would have really been a disaster is to continue under our old direction with the brutal schedule we had this year.
I’m not going to pretend that I understand all our picks. I do know that McDaniels has a young crop of athletes who are smart, motivated and willing to learn under the tutelage of some of the best players at their position for the next few years (Bailey, Dawkins and Graham).
Best-
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan "press on" has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race" Calvin Coolidge
by SSMT on Apr 26, 2009 12:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You should have read further.
I do not blame only the coordinators — we lacked talent and good coaching. yes, shanny was a large part of the problem, I agree. As I said, letting him go was probably the right move — we were doomed to mediocrity with him and his personnel and assistant coaching choices.
I agree the last 3 years were a disappointment to say the least.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 12:49 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
100% great post SSMT!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 26, 2009 3:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mate...seriously....how the hell do you, or anyone know, our front 7 is greatest area of need.....are you a defensive co-ordianator??
Let it go man.
You are looking at the needs as YOU see them….its your opinion and CLEARLY not the coaching staff!
I am prepared to back Nolan, Nunnely, Martindale and McDaniels more than you, me and ANYBODY on here with regards to our front 7.
It is obvious that the staff ranks the candidates we have NOW on roster higher than any of the guys in the draft you are pining for. So, the FO and staff has brought in play makers and players that fill positions that OUR staff see as needs.
We all tend to become experts during the draft, and then climb on the “Our coaches have no idea” band wagon when they do something we dont agree with…..case in point is this thread.
Its a good discussion, but the dpeths of despair based on opinion is a little over the top!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 26, 2009 2:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1000
That’s it in a nutshell…
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan "press on" has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race" Calvin Coolidge
by SSMT on Apr 26, 2009 3:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Although I disagree with much of your post
I very much appreciate the well-reasoned positions you have, as well as the lack of name calling.
by CoastalBronco on Apr 26, 2009 10:05 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Let's hope we get Hill or Taylor with this next pick
"according to the map, we've only gone 4 inches"
by MikeD55 on Apr 26, 2009 10:42 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
and its another safety, bringing the total on the roster to 5. we’ll be throwing away a draft pick or a FA signing for sure now.
this is exactly what I’m saying, complete disregard for needs.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 11:11 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
nightmare
I pretty much agree although i do understand not taking arakpo since we took ayers at 18, thank god for the raiders keeping us from having the worst draft
by rimrock on Apr 26, 2009 10:56 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Your Post relayed my thoughts
Thanks Dr.
About playing against Joe Namath "He's the best in the Business, he can do everything, but I've never seen a Quarterback yet that can throw on his back." - Dave Costa 1969
by Denver Diehard on Apr 26, 2009 11:06 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
i share your view completely
thanks for the post, and letting me know i’m not the only one who is concerned about this offseason, as you summarized perfectly. put your hardhat on, it’s going to be a rough ride.
taste my blintzkrieg!
2009-year of the defense.
by davecheffy on Apr 26, 2009 11:10 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Doc,
I clicked onto this post and almost didn’t read it after your disclaimer. I rolled my eyes that your post was going to be another doom and gloom, hate-filled rant. It was not, and I appreciate that.
I tend to trust the guys who are close to the situation, like the head coach. Regardless of what you think of him or his actions, none of us has the first-hand knowledge he does. That goes for the entire team working on this draft. They are the paid experts. And they have the information. I admit, I was beside myself, screaming at the TV when I saw Knowshon Moreno drafted. My biggest fear was that the Broncos would ignore the front 7. I was satisfied with Ayers. But what do I know? Just what I’ve read, and everyone has a different take. I trust the guys who have worked out the players, interviewed them, and get paid to analyze film about them.
That being said, I am glad I read your post. It was intelligent, well-stated, and your point-by-point support of your thesis makes a strong case. You may be right. We all hope you are not, but the fact is we will have to wait and see, because none of this can be proven until at LEAST after this season, and more likely after a few years.
In politics, it’s a good idea to question your government at times. In football, what can it hurt to question the regime? Who’s responsible to the fans anyway? All we can do is stop going to games, and McD is NOT the broncos, so no matter how bad or poorly coached, most of us will still be rooting for the orange and blue. When presented with the choice of being depressed for 6 months more, or being excited, I prefer excitement.
I thank you for your discourse, but I will not join you in doubt, just cautious optimism.
We can agree on one thing: GO BRONCOS!!!
-Harvey J. Neptune
"Practice doesn't make perfect. PERFECT practice makes perfect." - Vince Lombardi
by HarvJNep2n on Apr 26, 2009 11:43 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Moreno interview
at least the guy gives a pretty good interview. pretty well spoken and a good attitude. team first but not to a robotic extent. i like him.
"I want this team to be tough, smart and prepared to play well under pressure...Everybody here in this organization is going to be held accountable to do their job — their piece of the puzzle to make this team a competitor for a championship every season." J-Mac
by denver_diaspora on Apr 26, 2009 11:46 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm all for robotic players.
Can we draft that goofy Fox robot?
-Harvey J. Neptune
"Practice doesn't make perfect. PERFECT practice makes perfect." - Vince Lombardi
by HarvJNep2n on Apr 26, 2009 11:46 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Doc for sparking an awesome discussion
What I’m seeing come out of all of this is well-reasoned statements from two sides who are in absolute agreement on where the problems lie, but have radically different perceptions of what the solutions to those problems should be.
Like many of you, I’ve gotten to live through years where the Broncos were down at the bottom of the heap. And through years where we were the best of the best. Now we stand on a brink where we could go either way.
I’m hoping for a rise while fearing a decline. Either way it’s going to be a wild, exciting ride as we all continue to discuss and debate.
by BShrout on Apr 26, 2009 11:51 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Have you seen the latest addition?
Looks like we’ve added depth at a position Denver struggled with last year, OG, looks like we got a soldier in Seth Olsen just not sure about the scouting report on him
Lacks the deep kick-step and elite lateral quickness to handle the left tackle position, though he has experience there. May struggle on the outside at right tackle.
So where would he play best?
by lovewatchinthegame on Apr 26, 2009 12:21 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
he’s a terrible fit in a ZB system. apparently we’re abandoning that as well? I can only surmise.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 12:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Struggled?
When did we struggle at OG last year? No, in my opinion, that position is deep, young, and good.
I think the Doc is right. ZB is dead in Denver, as is anything else advocated by Shanny.
Historically, this makes sense: When a new Overlord takes power, he (and at various times, she) often tried to erase any record of the former ruler. Anyone care to count the ways this has happened in the last 3+ months . . .
by Elway's Ghost on Apr 26, 2009 12:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
ZB is dead, yep. watch, next year we’ll be trading Clady for Taylor Mays! Can’t have enough safeties! :p
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 12:51 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
biggest complaint
how was Den’s D line improved? We couldn’t stop the run last year, brought in a ST ace from Indy who runs a 4-3 and back up NT from Nolan’s old team who was not a great D and a 2 down ILB from Cleveland who might have been a worse Def then Denvers. Who on this roster can stop the RB before a 4 yard gain? the safety’s last year allowed as many big running plays as passing plays and Dawkins and Goodman were paid good money to upgrade. Now we’ve drafted two more S and a nickle CB with a first round pick after we also paid good money to Hill. How does this stop the Run before a 5 yard carry? What dominate inside or outside LB do we have? DJ will have started at more LB positions this next year then anyone else I could name. Larsen, Davis, Moss, Doom, Bailey-who’s ever played in a 3-4? Didn’t Denvers worse def running games last year involve them playing some 3-4, thats my memory at least.
Love the Broncos, been wrong on many many picks in the past but just would love to see two NT on the team at least seeing as there doesn’t seem to be one of starting caliber.
sbhchawk
by sbhchawk on Apr 26, 2009 12:31 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I posted Above
Something you might like to read. Consider though that we have a lot more information on how our current players would translate to a 3-4 than many of the guys coming out of college. If they felt that they could make the transition better then drafting them wouldn’t make sense. I think that is what we are seeing playing out.
Don't jump off the cliff but if the guys next to you are loud and annoying try to push them off.
by Kfustud on Apr 26, 2009 1:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
kfustud
first I tried to figure out your “handle” and came up with alot of non posting quality ideas. Was kind of fun and i wanted to thank you for responding to my post. Thats what this is about, and I want to say that I want you to be right. I’ll buy you a keg a month if your right.
but….in your post (I did go back and reread it) you stated that the talent was misused and not a fact that they weren’t talented. I think this is where we see things differently. Beyond Thomas our Def got pushed around last year and he was good but not great. Now in a 3-4 the line has to be more stout and we got pushed around in a 4-3. NoseTackle is the hardest position to fill. Alot of things I read stated that SD fell off last year not because of Merriman injury but because there NT Williams didn’t play well so the OLine got to the LB’s much easier. I see this same problem with the Den DLine. No linemen with the ability to occupy several OLinemen so the LB’s can flow to the ball. what are your thoughts as to what linemen have shown the ability to stop bigger OLine men from pushing them around?
sbhchawk
by sbhchawk on Apr 26, 2009 2:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough, we won’t know until the games are played. KFu was because I study Kung Fu and have for years. So this handle just follows me around. If i was to reregister I would probably use Bronco…something. Oh well.
Yes the NT is important, the thing I will say is to have some trust in Nolan if not in McD. He has shored up run defenses. Look, it would have been easy to go after lots of D lineman, they must feel that the team is more solid there than we would. That is my whole argument and I would suggest that while you can be worried or unsure try to see what they are doing.
Don't jump off the cliff but if the guys next to you are loud and annoying try to push them off.
by Kfustud on Apr 26, 2009 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Follows me around because I logged in using my Yahoo account from long ago. Just an FYI i doubt anyone cares.
Don't jump off the cliff but if the guys next to you are loud and annoying try to push them off.
by Kfustud on Apr 26, 2009 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks for the thoughts
I do hope your right my fellow Bronco nut Kung Fu (My guess were never close, hopefully like my eval of this weekend). Thanks for the follow through and as we said several times we’ll see if there was a plan or talent that scapes my attention. And as I’ve said, this site teaches me things more often then not and I hope your on that trail. good night boys as I’ve got a family to convince that I care alot about them still.
sbhchawk
by sbhchawk on Apr 26, 2009 4:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Hope I am Right Too
Here’s crossing the fingers…
Don't jump off the cliff but if the guys next to you are loud and annoying try to push them off.
by Kfustud on Apr 27, 2009 8:36 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Valid complaint
I think it’s true we have very little indication that the DL has improved. And certainly it’s a surprise that we haven’t taken an NT in the draft. Sure hope there are some eye-opening June 1 cuts on the D-line, in addition to perhaps a Peppers trade.
by ZooTown on Apr 26, 2009 1:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe we’ll trade Clady for Peppers! :p
seriously, I would barely be surprised at this point.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 2:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
?????
……..are there any rumors that ‘Nolan’ wants out yet ?
by rockymtnfan on Apr 26, 2009 1:25 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
?????
………or ‘Dawkins’ wonders what the meaning of ‘not rebuilding’ IS ?
by rockymtnfan on Apr 26, 2009 1:38 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Alphonso Smith and a mini-rant
First and formost a great player. Second, and this seems to be lost on a lot of people, the FA secondary help are all 30 or over and were necessary to make the unit servicable now, so depth and a future for the unit are pretty important…especially if you want to keep your job for more than a couple of years. Primarily, though, Smith is a financial move, and it is very unrealistic to expect a team to have four unproven prospects getting first round guarantees on your roster (i.e. Four first rounders in two years). McX saw a player they love— a guy with a first round grade— filled a legitimate hole and did it for about half the money. I can respect the organization’s desire to be financially prudent.
Finally, as an aside, how can you bemoan future building in the same post that you predict that the Broncos gave up a Top 10 Pick? Maybe its time to acknowledge that outside of Broncofandome, there aren’t a lot of people predicting a deep playoff run for the 2010 Broncos no matter what they do/did in the 2009 draft. Unfortunately, the Broncos are not a player or two away from contention, and I’m glad to see a draft strategy that reflects that.
Can I just shout it out once more for a young, already hyper-criticized coach who has the guts to build a long term football team despite constant pressure to find ways to fit a square peg in a round hole. Even if this draft ultimately flops, Josh McDaniels has earned this fan’s respect the last two days.
I am an idiot walking a tightrope of fortune and fame
I am an acrobat swinging trapezes through circles of flame
If you've never stared off in the distance, then your life is a shame
and though I'll never forget your face,
sometimes i can't remember my name.
--Counting Crows, "Mrs. Potter's Lullaby"
by PredominantlyOrange on Apr 26, 2009 1:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I have no issue with Alphonso Smith the player if he turns out, and I think he will. But how can you proclaim him a great player before he touches an NFL field? I get that our secondary was old…but McDaniels himself signed all those “old guys.” Why in the world would he do that if he planned to draft the position at the draft? It’s wasteful of money in the extreme, not to mention trade and draft resources.
As a financial move it’s certainly interesting. Are we that bad off money wise or cap wise? If we are, why not keep the future pick and trade it next year when there’s more value, instead of paying another rookie this year? I simply do not buy it was financially motivated, and McDaniels himself said it had nothing to do with finances. This argument is pure fabrication invented by people attempting to justify the move.
How can you call this a draft strategy that planned for the future? We needed to inject talent into the front 7 — young talent — that would pay off in the future. Would it have fixed things overnight? No, and we have a very hard schedule next year and all kinds of “growing” pains looming with new systems, new players, new coaches, etc. So what do we do? Ignore major needs that need youth, trade future picks for players at positions not needed NOW? This strategy says the complete opposite to me: McDaniels continually reached, traded up, and traded the future because he’s in denial about the front 7.
You completely mistake me. No one wants s
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 2:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
bah, posted by accident
no one wants square pegs in round holes. there were round pegs available all over the draft that didn’t require reaching and didn’t require mortgaging the future. And ones that started where a defense should start — the trenches.
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 2:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just saying...
..the overall depth in the secondary is as critical of an issue as the front seven. I very respectfully disagree with those who believe that the front seven is the only glaring issue on this team. In fact, after learning that D.J. will be the weakside IlB, I actually have a hard time coming up with a LB need at all. Brian Orakpo, for example, has played as many snaps at Rush OLB as Elvis Dumervile. I think Elvis is the better bet seeing that he has actually played effectively in this league. Other than that, Orakpo and Doom are straight up even when it comes to upside at the position. Yes, we need D line horses, but if the gap between one of those and an available CB or S is large, then get the DB. I can especially understand this logic when you consider that Ron Brace played next to the annointed best DT in the draft, which, in my mind, makes him harder to project than Alphonso Smith, who produced on an island. Is the gap between Ron Brace’s potential and Ronnie Fields bigger than the gap between Alphonso Smith’s potential and Josh Bell? I tend to think not. That’s why I agree with the move and the pick. Obviously, I’m as high on Smith as McX, so that clouds my argument, but I think landing a guy with Smith’s resume makes a lot of sense in a lot of ways for this team.
I am an idiot walking a tightrope of fortune and fame
I am an acrobat swinging trapezes through circles of flame
If you've never stared off in the distance, then your life is a shame
and though I'll never forget your face,
sometimes i can't remember my name.
--Counting Crows, "Mrs. Potter's Lullaby"
by PredominantlyOrange on Apr 26, 2009 10:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
McD gets Tom Brady in the 6th
6th round; 6’5" 220lbs.; pocket passer, strong arm, accurate…. the Broncs get TOM BRAnDstater.
Ooops! McD pops some more migrane meds and goes back to looking for a NT.
by donkeys on Apr 26, 2009 2:15 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
i have no problem with the QB pick. it’s ignoring the front seven with every other pick i dislike. and this trading up to reach for players probably there at the picks we originally had — that’s awful bush league raider type stuff. he was projected as a undrafted FA for god’s sakes!
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 2:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I completely agree Doc. And if you do reach in the NFL Draft, reach for a defensive lineman.
by donkeys on Apr 26, 2009 2:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brandstater trade
We gave up a 5th in 2010 and a 7th in 2009 to move up to the first pick in the 6th round.
by donkeys on Apr 26, 2009 2:28 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
drafting for the future, huh PredominantlyOrange? yay for losing future assets!
by thedoctor on Apr 26, 2009 2:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What a strange thing to do with draft picks
I am reminded of the California Golden Seals, formerly of the NHL. They always traded away their draft picks and never made any progress. The reason most of you probably never heard of them is that they folded. I am very concerned with the cavalier disposal of future draft picks.
I agree, Larsen shouldn’t get any bigger. I am getting tired of his bone crushing hits knocking the pixels off my TV, once they fall to the floor they are very hard to find.
by Arctic Bronco on Apr 26, 2009 2:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
please, please
no more posting talking about a “final cure” my heart can’t take anymore after today. a small favor mr arctic
sbhchawk
by sbhchawk on Apr 26, 2009 2:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Doctor is 100% correct
Megadittos Doc
by LLFuzzball on Apr 26, 2009 2:36 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Makes sense to me..
Heres some numbers for you… 35, 30,30, 30.. those aren’t 40 times, those are the ages, respectively, of Brian Dawkins, Champ Bailey, Renaldo Hill, and Andre Goodman. There’s only 3 players ( out of 10) in the secondary unit that are under the age of 27. Youth was needed to replace the aging corps there and, at the same time, learn what they can from Dawkins and Bailey while they’re still with the team. Very smart move in my book to shore up a future MAJOR problem when these guys retire or slow down at the same time.
Secondly, the front 7 are weak and need help but that was more because a lack of ANY playmaker. Doubleteams weren’t consistent so the opposing O-Line could adjust to outmaneuver as needed. With Ayers, the Broncos should add that consistent doubleteam threat and allow for package blitz’s and stunts to open up the pass rush.
With the new threat up front and the secondary getting younger, they can pick and choose who they need and figure out what’s really missing from the Front 7 that needs help. Also, just because you sign someone doesn’t mean you have to keep them. Many of these picks will be cut and easily some people just signed as FA will get cut now.
With Moreno’s pickup, that is now true with the RB squad too. I think it will boil down to Moreno, Hillis and Jordan. Moreno is a talented and pure runner who will be well worth his pick and will provide extra pass protection against the blitz happy teams. The varied skill sets possessed by each make a full RB trio for McDaniels offensive scheme.
The pick of Quinn was not a head scratcher in my book. McDaniels is a Pats coach so look at what he did with TE in the Patriots system. Answer: They played FB more than TE. Watch footage of Kyle Brady and you’ll see what I mean. The TE in McD’s system is a hybrid FB/TE that is expected to do more blocking than anything else and can catch a pass in the flat. He’ll also act as a screen lineman and a goalline threat. At 6-4, 264 he should open up some huge holes for Hillis(or the tandem make a mean pass blocking punch) and Moreno while providing a brutal pounding goalline rushing attack with Jordan. As a tight end, you can keep Scheffler and get rid of Graham and that ugly contract. (for the record, that signing bonus may have been prorated so he’s probably $5 mil against the cap easy). So you free up money, make Hillis a RB with Jordan and Moreno and maybe Buckhalter, dump the rest and you’re good to go.
Brandstater is a McD project. He’ll be good enough to start in a year or so and will have come cheap. Just needs better footwork.
All in all, great draft in my eyes.
by satsunada on Apr 26, 2009 3:10 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
You are right on with your DB analysis.
Having young, talented DB’s here to learn from our FA veteran signings is the best way to get full value from Dawkins, Bailey, Hill, and Goodman. All of these guys have passed or are at their peak (not that they’re still not great). They are worth having in the backfield for a few more years. Use them as mentors to new players who are willing to learn from them and they are worth twice as much. As much as would have liked to see a monster NT, these picks make long term sense.
"My job description is to win football games. I'm a hard worker. I'm not flashy by any means, but my job is to play football and win and I plan to do that." Kyle Orton
by odarol on Apr 26, 2009 4:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent
Satsunada,
You hit the nail on the head. I actually began writing something similar when I was talking to Doc earlier but gave up out of sheer laziness and not wanting to argue. But, if you understand football, what you say is true.
Everyone just automatically assumes you must have some big stud NT to make it all happen. We have a talented LB core and another exciting option and DE/OLB to mix things up. Blitz packages will be welcomed at Invesco after being sorely missed…ala Greg Robinson.
We’ll see about keeping Schef. I still think he’s a little bent out of shape about Cutler and may be trying to finagle his way out of dodge. If he wants to stay – great. If not, let him lose.
Excellent Post
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan "press on" has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race" Calvin Coolidge
by SSMT on Apr 26, 2009 3:31 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
doctor--I share some of your concerns
I just made this comment at swg’s post—maybe it will answer some of your fears. I may be totally wrong—but maybe not.
.
I have a thought on our front seven. Maybe we have the players already—maybe the problems with the last two years was not players—maybe it was bad schemes and lack of direction.
.
I know I’ve said this before and it may be getting old but I think Carlton Powell may end up being a great NT. Lined up with Marcus Thomas we have two really great atheletes. Jarvis Moss gets a shot at LB with DJ, Woodyard, and Ayers That only leaves us one player short of a really great front seven.
.
.
If McDaniels and Nolan bring in a good scheme—our defense could really surprise us this year….Keep the faith brother.

.
Guardian of the Gate to La La Land!
Little, Wright, Atwater, Davis, and Sharpe...
Why are they not in the Hall...I just don't understand.
by Mike Clark on Apr 26, 2009 4:50 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
just wondering
Lots of people say fixing the front seven is a glaring need…or us ut fixing the play of the front seven at a price we can afford?
MHR...and proud of it!
by MHRsGirl on Apr 26, 2009 4:52 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
For the record, Leroy Hill LB from Seahawks is now a UFA and not franchised. He was an OLB in a 4-3 which is kinda the same as a 3-4 OLB ..blitzing and some coverage. He had decent stats and was Franchised for a reason.. i say take a look at him and move Ayers to DE after he gets to 285-290 on size.
by satsunada on Apr 26, 2009 5:01 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
Leroy Hill would be a good addition.
by CoastalBronco on Apr 26, 2009 5:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahahahaha
It doesnt mattter. When you have skills like this coach, talent is an after thought.
by camp1997 on Apr 26, 2009 5:41 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I respect the opinion
but I disagree.
we did somethings that needed to be done. sure we have a need in other areas but we spent a lot of money in FA to fill holes. this draft with filled need. do think Bailey is going to take a contract like moss did in two years? I doubt it Champ is worth every dollar he gets paid but he is gonna be expensive.
http://www.davusx.net/assets/db/la_la_land.gif
"We should have kept Seattle and dumped San Diego from the Division"
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
by Jon Tollerud on Apr 26, 2009 5:53 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




























