The Broncos hit a home run!
Wow, McDaniels has gone crazy?! Not really, he just has a plan. Back in January, my post Draft a 1st Round Running Back with a terrible defense? You Betcha! had generated a great discussion. Before we had the extra pick from the big trade, I started to see the value of Knowshon Moreno. It appears through this draft that McDaniels is getting Denver ready for some smashmouth football. Why? Well there is a reason he passed on better Tight Ends for the best blocking TE available. There is a reason why he brought in bigger backs via free agency in Jordan and Arrington - I wonder if Young and Hall are already cleaning out their lockers. There is a reason that we drafted a couple of interior lineman. This new Denver team is being built to run, and I couldn't be happier.
The new regime held that mini-camp before the draft to see if these young kids on defense were really that bad or just young. I think he felt the latter and that there was no need to replace them, just teach them differently. First Nolan brought in Ronnie Fields, so they obviously feel good about him. Second, they probably wanted to get a look at Carlton Powell, who had off the charts run stopping college stats. They must have felt good about him too and other players and how our current players will fit into their scheme. Enough so that they were able to address different needs in the draft. In my post Time of Transition, I find some interesting information on Jarvis Moss...
Reports out of college imply that Denver may have misused Moss all along. This information is from a scouting report done by the Pittsburgh Steelers who inquired about his ability to play standing up...
"I told them I’m up for whatever (position)," Moss said. "Whatever my need is called and whatever is going to help the team win, I’m ready for it."
Had he ever dropped into coverage as a Gator?
"My position was called ‘The Fox,’ where I would drop into coverage during our fire zones," he said. "I did some when I was working out in Orlando. We did some linebacker-specific drills. It’s something I enjoy. My body moves well and I can run well and I’m really athletic, so it’s something I really enjoy. I’m looking forward to it if it’s my calling."
A scouting report from FFtoolbox.com...
"Moss has a tremendous upside and playmaker potential as a pass rusher off the edge.. He displays a quick burst off the edge, which allows him to set up wide of the tackle and easily shed the block to disrupt the quarterback. His quickness and agility allows him to slide down the line of scrimmage in pursuit of the ball carrier. Moss has the ability to drop into coverage based in athleticism and natural instincts. He will clearly need to bulk up to compete as an every down defensive end at the next level. Moss also lacks the upper body strength of most defensive linemen, thus often has difficulty shedding offensive linemen once engaged. He needs to develop additional pass rushing moves and avoid his dependency to beat his opponents on sheer speed alone. Moss is probably better suited to move to outside linebacker in a 3-4 scheme to showcase his athleticism and play making abilities"
Multiple scouting reports from the 2007 NFL Combine implied that Moss showed fluid hips and great movement in coverage, he was labeled a "tweener". Perhaps this change to a 3-4 may be like adding a first round pick from 2007, it was just on lay away
Some fans have obvious questions for some of the draft day decisions that at the surface seem silly and foolish.
Why trade a 1st round pick for a 2nd round player? That answer has already been discussed but I think it is two fold. One, money was a factor. They have scouts who analyzed the first round Cornerbacks next year and said, "are they going to be 10 million dollars better than Alphonso Smith?" Why Smith you ask? - well he is a ball hawk and when you win the turnover battle and the time of possession battle, you have a great chance to win. Plus, if you value him as a first round pick, how could he not be better than the 2010 corner after working with Champ Bailey and NFL coaches for a year?
Smith + NFL Experience including Champ Bailey + the million dollar savings is > a high priced rookie Cornerback. Well what about other players, like Mays or Spikes or whoever. Obviously when your entire secondary is over 30 you realize that you will be targeting a corner, so get a good one now, a proven ball hawk at a cheaper rate and allow to gain a year of NFL experience. Good move.
The second good move is the two DB's - The Safeties. One ball hawk and one "in the box guy". Learn from Dawkins and add youth to the secondary. Once it was determined that our front seven needed some tweaking not changing then the draft was destined to go in a direction that we didn't anticipate. We the fan just see the terrible results and automatically think our players stink. Imagine if we traded Jarvis Moss or Tim Crowder to a 3-4 team and they flourished would you be upset we didn't give them a chance in our system. After all they played under Slowik's system so how is it fair to judge their fit in our new system? This draft wasn't a neglect to team needs, it was an affirmation that we already have what we need, just need to use it differently.
Couple all this with the fact the new additions are all great character guys with great upside and I find it hard to say that this wasn't a great two days for the Denver Broncos.
Be excited Bronco fans, when the Broncos are on the road and the bus stops out in front of that stadium and Peyton Hillis and Knowshon Moreno are the first to walk off the bus - everybody in town is going to know "the Broncos are here"!
Go Broncos!
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
12 recs |
95 comments
Comments
Nice Post SteveO
I like your thoughts. I would like to see Moss given a chance but we’ve heard those rumors of him being offered around. I hope their rumors. Trades/releases can and probably will still happen though. We added Ayers to an already crowded DE/OLB position. I don’t konw exactly where we will us Ayers but whether its on the line or standing up, someone will probably be getting the axe. I would like to see Moss given a chance in the 3-4 though.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Apr 26, 2009 10:44 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks T.Dot
Moreno in 2009! - Check
Mays in 2010!
by Steve O' on Apr 26, 2009 10:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post man
Really insightful
"I'm very important. I have many leather-bound books and my apartment smells of rich mahogany." - Ron Burgundy
"I'd rather hit than have sex."- Reggie Jackson
"Obviously your not a golfer." - The Dude
by Elway4Prez on Apr 26, 2009 10:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
More like a lame duck!!!
“It appears through this draft that McDaniels is getting Denver ready for some smashmouth football.”
Your own words, “smashmouth football”. What would you consider smash mouth football? Did you forget that Denver is the running back capital of the NFL?
Let me help you understand a little about what our running game did last year. We averaged 4.8 yards per carry (with 7 RB to IR) and that was good enough for 2nd best in the NFL. Additionally, if we had enough carries we would have been the 2nd best running team in the NFL. Now that’s smash mouth football.
Why draft a position that we are 2nd best in the NFL?
Also, McD wanted to trade away Hillis, Torain, and Young. No smash mouth with Hillis on McD’s bus afterall.
Now to the young players on defense. You’re using WAY to many “ifs” here. What “if” Moss and Crowder became better at 3/4. What “if” they do this and do that. McD is putting way to much of his eggs in one basket. Draft a known and proven player in the position that will make your team better.
Trading draft picks 1st for a 2nd? Dumbest thing I have seen in a long time. And, your logic may be even dumber. Ever heard of trading down? The Patriots did it, this year, not once, not twice, but three times and picked up bunch of 2nd and 3rd round picks. This years NFL draft class was said to be weak, and next years NFL draft class is suppose to be one of the better class in a long time. Why trade away leverage of trading down for many more picks? Just dumb logic on both part of McD and yourself.
Broncos all the way!!! No such thing as rebuilding under Shanahan.
by vieng111 on Apr 26, 2009 11:06 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
A few notes...
I don’t recall reading anything about trading Hillis, Torrain or Young. Where did you see that? We differ on our views and that’s cool but saying “draft a known and proven player” doesn’t make sense because there’s no such thing as a known player in a draft. There are no guarantees. It is impossible to know who will perform well in the NFL, you can take a good guess but it’s still not 100% where as a proven veteran is a guarantee. Lastly “no such thing as rebuilding under Shanahan” is the reason we’re 24 and 24 in the last 3 years.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Apr 26, 2009 11:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice to see you come back, and then bag everything that the team has done.....typical of fans that BAG everything that they dont agree with.....with fans like you you who needs enemies> Get your facts right, do some research before coming on here..
and sprout garbage that is clearly your opinion and has no fact.
Damn I am over posts like this!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 27, 2009 7:21 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1
somethings wrong, Trying to conquer these fears i thought were gone. And it's been so long, I'm dying to live in a world i don't belong
by broncfanstuckinsd on Apr 27, 2009 2:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why does their YPA matter?
The Broncos were 28th in the league in rushing attempts. Not all of that is attributable to Jeremy Bates or the defense. The Broncos racked up their YPA by gaining large chunks of yardage in games in which they got blown out. Check out the game logs…
As for draft choices, if Smith becomes the player McDaniels and Co. expect him to be, the trade will be worth it. Can you at least admit that’s a possibility?
by Douglas A. Lee on Apr 27, 2009 8:16 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you answered your own question
Why draft a running back? 7 running backs lost to IR last year. 38 running backs went down to injury in 2008.
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and hope you come down somewhere between the two.
by BShrout on Apr 27, 2009 8:50 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
ooops, left off part of the sentence
38 running backs went down to injury in the NFL in 2008.
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and hope you come down somewhere between the two.
by BShrout on Apr 27, 2009 8:51 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So...
….the Broncos lost seven, and the other 31 teams averaged one per? That’s gotta say something, about conditioning or karma or who knows what.
Growing older is not for sissies. Jack Palance
by bradley on Apr 27, 2009 9:50 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
and the pats lost 6 or 7 of the others
some lucky teams out there last year, no doubt, though it shoudl be noted that PIT platooned regulalrly and lost a couple guys for the season…
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 27, 2009 1:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
"No such thing as rebuilding under Shanahan."
Surely you jest. The whole reason the defense needs to be rebuilt is because of Shanahan. I love Shanny, but we’ve been mediocre for years, and what you call “no rebuilding” I call stagnating.
"Don't be an ass!" --Bill King
by batgirl on Apr 27, 2009 1:33 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Great post, SteveO!
You were right from the beginning, and you convinced me to want a RB in the first round.
"Really, I'm a high-motor guy. Tough, hard-nosed, a hard runner, can make you miss at times. And just competitive. I love to play the game and I bring that energy to my team. So, we'll see how that goes." - Knowshon Moreno
Knowshon Moreno is the boss!
by stedtfeld on Apr 26, 2009 11:20 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Trades for RB
When McD first came to the Broncos, he signed three FA running backs and stated that he was willing to listen to offers for the remaining running backs.
I understand known and proven players are a stretch, but I would rather have us drafted Orakpo, Ayers, Chung, and Brace (in that order). I believe they would have helped this team much more then Moreno.
Shanahan may have gone 24-24, but the Broncos were competitive until the last week of the season. Last year, they weren’t even picked to come close to the playoffs. Look how competitive we made it. I don’t see us being competitive at all next year. We may be eliminated by the 9th week of the season or even earlier. That in itself may exacerbate of how upset I am with trading away a possible top 5 pick next year.
by vieng111 on Apr 26, 2009 11:26 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
You can spend six months
contemplating a disastrous season, or you can choose to buy into the changes made by a guy who is getting paid a lot more than us to do this, which is his job. Have some faith, and don’t give yourself an ulcer. There will be plenty of time to slam McDaniels IF the losses pile up in the fall. As for myself, I’d rather spend six months being excited.
As for your penultimate point, the Broncos were hardly competitive in 2008. When playing in the abysmally bad AFC West last year, our good fortune lasted just as long as it took the Chargers to get consistent. We won some games we shouldn’t have won, and they lost a couple they should have won. It was dumb luck we were even a contender at all in 2008, and it’s a showing I wasn’t proud of. Had the Chargers played to their potential, we would have been eliminated by week 9 LAST year. Depending on other teams to do the work for you is precisely the kind of Hail Mary Shanahan was fired for: “hey let’s get an injury-prone 7th rounder and MAYBE he’ll magically work out….”
Taking players just because their stats look good out of college would turn us into Oakland. McDaniels had a plan to draft quality leaders with specific talent and great intangibles who can be coached up. I will eat my words at the end of the season if we don’t see some promise in these kids, but don’t call the day a failure if it’s only 8 AM.
-Harvey J. Neptune
"Practice doesn't make perfect. PERFECT practice makes perfect." - Vince Lombardi
by HarvJNep2n on Apr 26, 2009 11:44 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
classic
… but don’t call the day a failure if it’s only 8 AM.
I can just see someone screaming in vain in the middle of the night about how the sun simply won’t ever rise again.
Patience. These are people we are talking about, not legos, and I for one am very pleased with the PEOPLE that Denver has brought on board. I can’t fathom asking for more than that. It’s like demanding omniscience or something….
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 27, 2009 1:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Love my Broncos but hate the new Philospohy of McD
Harvey, Love my Broncos but hate the new philospohy of McD!!! Of course I will always cheer for my Broncos through thick and thin, but watching McD make one bad decision after another that "may" take my beloved Broncos down a losing streak for the next five years. I cannot sit back and watch, I will voice my opinion. Just like the rest of Broncos Nation.
Trading away future #1 picks (possible top 5), trading away franchise players, not drafting position of need (Orakpo, Chung, & Brace), and many others.
I disagree with you on the competitive aspect, I think we were very competitive in 2008. Broncos won 8 games and it could of easily been 11 or 12 games. That I call being competitive. When you miss the playoff on the last day of the season, that’s being competitive. When we say we should of won the close ones and be 12-4, that’s being competitive.
The AFC West and the Chargers, you cannot say "had the Chargers played to there potential" or we got lucky because of this and that…It played out the way it did and we were competitive to the last day. I could of easily said what if we won 4 of those close games or had the Broncos played to there potential against KC, Raiders, or Buffalo we wouldn’t be discussing this at all.
by vieng111 on Apr 27, 2009 1:58 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comments that have merit - vieng
I can’t say that I hate the McD philosophy because I really don’t know exactly what it is. The closest I can come to is the NE style of Offense. The McD philosophy for Defense is still in doubt. I think so far we have had too many questionable decisions by the new Coaching regime, and it’s easy not to be optimistic. What I like about your comment is the competiveness that the Broncos gave. This is an important issue for the season forthcoming. Had the Broncos applied any consistant pressure from the front 3 or 4 depending, Denver could and should have made the playoffs with ease.
I like Ayers, and think he will improve the line, but Fields is an unknown to us. Obviously Nolan knows him, but will Fields be able to handle the load? Denver needs a NT regardless, and the position was not addressed in the draft. I am excited for the secondary and hope that the newbies will make an impact along with the great Veterans such as Dawkins and Champ. My biggest concern is that without the front seven pressure, it will still be a long days for the Denver Secondary regardless of who is there.
About playing against Joe Namath "He's the best in the Business, he can do everything, but I've never seen a Quarterback yet that can throw on his back." - Dave Costa 1969
by Denver Diehard on Apr 27, 2009 3:01 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really?????You are an expert of philosphy.....Vieng, whta is his philosophy???? I would like to know....give me a run down!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 27, 2009 7:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looks to me
As though they drafted exactly the positions you referred to, just not who you would have preferred them to draft:
Orakpo=Ayers
Chung=McBath
Brace=Baker
Let’s see how they work out!
"I told him (Montrae), don't worry, you'll pass out before you die" -- Rick Tuten
by littletinybroncos on Apr 27, 2009 7:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't get the love for Orakpo
He was an overpaid bust waiting to happen, but will likely do OK now since he has Haynesworth commanding so much attention…. I watched many a game with him, and I just don’t get it. I honestly can’t believe that he would bring more to this team than Moreno.
Anywho, I am always up for debating the pros and cons as it relates to my team :)
by Broncotodd on Apr 27, 2009 8:17 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
This infatuation with Brian Orakpo is confounding. He’s a 4-3 DE. Bring up all the “Merriman” comments you want but Orakpo has neither Merriman’s explosiveness, athleticism in the open field (BIG reason he’d struggle at OLB) nor his power.
We aren’t in the 4-3 anymore. We’re using a hybrid and we arguably picked up the most versatile DL prospect in the entire draft. Ayers can play 3-4 OLB, 3-4 DE, 4-3 DE & 4-3 DT. That’s a weapon, ala Justin Tuck.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Apr 27, 2009 10:48 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
And...
When was the last time a Texas product matched their lofty expectations?
by AllBroncsallday on Apr 27, 2009 11:40 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
By the way...
I’d LOVE to know which of the Broncos’ losses could have easily been wins, translating to 11 or 12 games.
by Douglas A. Lee on Apr 27, 2009 8:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not taking sides:
But the Miami game should have been a ‘w’.
I’m still pissed about the phantom PI call on BMarsh on the TD play.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 27, 2009 8:26 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that's a reach...
but I’ll trade you that for the San Diego game and we’re still 8-8
by Douglas A. Lee on Apr 27, 2009 8:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
a lot of our losses were blow outs too
a lot of the WINS were very close and could have gone the other way: SD, NO, CLE, ATL
I’m not dogging the concept, I mean, 9 times out of ten a game is going to be a tough, scrappy win, but the blowouts were disheartening on epic levels.
I mean, trading blowouts with the faders still makes me sick….
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 27, 2009 1:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harv, that's a great comment
Depending on other teams to do the work for you is precisely the kind of Hail Mary Shanahan was fired for: "hey let’s get an injury-prone 7th rounder and MAYBE he’ll magically work out…."
Another problem was that he often took that 7th rounding in the 1st round.
Hillis/Moreno in '09
by Emmett Smith on Apr 27, 2009 10:56 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Broncos were competitive in the Standings, not on the playing field
It doesn’t mean a thing that they had a chance to make the playoffs. They gave up 78 more points than they scored, which is the mark of a 6-10 team. They lucked their way into a couple of wins (see San Diego and New Orleans) and got absolutely mauled in several other games. I’m not sure what about these scores indicates competitiveness…
Chiefs 33 Broncos 19
Pats 41 Broncos 7
Raiders 31 Broncos 10
Panthers 30 Broncos 10
Chargers 52 Broncos 21
Losses like that don’t happen very often to “competitive teams”. A competitive team which lost a lot of games but has a bright future would be the Packers, who only got blown out once.
by Douglas A. Lee on Apr 27, 2009 8:21 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly!
The Broncos over-achieved to an 8-8 record. They were very lucky to win the SD game at home as we all know. They did have a few good road wins (Jets, Falcons), but they were pretty uncompetitive against other good teams — Patriots, Panthers, Chargers game 2.
A good Broncos team would have beaten the Chiefs and Raiders twice last year — they were bad teams — rivalry or no rivalry. A good team would have easily beaten a floundering Bills team at home.
The Broncos were good at one thing last year. Moving the ball between the 20s. Their special teams were poor and their defense was one of the worst in the past ten years according the Football Outsiders.
I am interested to see what the new coach/gm combo can do. It will be exciting. I think we need to give them at least two years to really judge them. An 8-8 record where they are competitive every week with their schedule would be a huge improvement in quality of play if not record over the 2008 Broncos. I am hoping for better, but we will see what happens.
Keep Moving Forward.
by ColoradoOwl on Apr 27, 2009 8:42 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hands up who would have taken the 7-9 record of Green Bay, but where they lost their games by less than 10 all year?
I would…because thats a competitive team that will make that leap this year.
Thats where we need to get to this year with our team….to be competitive in EVERY game!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 27, 2009 8:55 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually...
Green Bay was 6-10
They lost 7 games by 4 points or fewer…
by Douglas A. Lee on Apr 27, 2009 11:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
and had they just scored 7 points in all those games...
13-3 baby.
GB is doing exactly what McD is trying to do: rebuild. For too long the Green Bay franchise rode on Favre’s coattails, and when he left them, they really didn’t have anything. Look at them now, just over a year later. Green Bay is getting back to what they used to be: dominant. but not too dominant that we can’t beat them ;)
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win" -Brandon Marshall
by Joe Medina on Apr 27, 2009 12:49 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I appreciate you making your point
but please don’t post those scores again! :^)
Here’s to looking ahead.
by CoastalBronco on Apr 27, 2009 8:59 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
HAHAHA.....they hot home dont they Coastal!!!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 27, 2009 9:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
hit....sorry about the typo!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 27, 2009 9:09 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
After week 3 we were ranked 27th in scoring!......thats a sobering stat!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 27, 2009 9:09 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry CB!
Just trying to make a painful point…
You may want to cover your eyes at 6:30EST, because there’s more of that coming then…
by Douglas A. Lee on Apr 27, 2009 11:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the warning
I’m guessing you’re talking about the 2008 in review post that was up briefly this morning…
Last year’s stats always makes me cringe.
by CoastalBronco on Apr 27, 2009 12:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha, that's the one...
Originally it was just a FanPost but John asked me to work it into a full-fledged post.
by Douglas A. Lee on Apr 27, 2009 12:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remember this
Denver is the first team since the move to 16 games that won more than 4 game while giving up over 425 points. So I agree with you NYC.
somethings wrong, Trying to conquer these fears i thought were gone. And it's been so long, I'm dying to live in a world i don't belong
by broncfanstuckinsd on Apr 27, 2009 2:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Love my Broncos but hate the new Philospohy of McD
Harvey, Love my Broncos but hate the new philospohy of McD!!! Of course I will always cheer for my Broncos through thick and thin, but watching McD make one bad decision after another that “may” take my beloved Broncos down a losing streak for the next five years. I cannot sit back and watch, I will voice my opinion. Just like the rest of Broncos Nation.
Trading away future #1 picks (possible top 5), trading away franchise players, not drafting position of need (Orakpo, Chung, & Brace), and many others.
I disagree with you on the competitive aspect, I think we were very competitive in 2008. Broncos won 8 games and it could of easily been 11 or 12 games. That I call being competitive. When you miss the playoff on the last day of the season, that’s being competitive. When we say we should of won the close ones and be 12-4, that’s being competitive.
The AFC West and the Chargers, you cannot say “had the Chargers played to there potential” or we got lucky because of this and that…It played out the way it did and we were competitive to the last day. I could of easily said what if we won 4 of those close games or had the Broncos played to there potential against KC, Raiders, or Buffalo we wouldn’t be discussing this at all.
by vieng111 on Apr 27, 2009 1:55 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
You really need to stop referencing trading a 1st round pick especially a top 5. Do you understand how worthless those top 5 picks were to teams. They ALL wanted to trade down and none of them could save for the Jets going crazy to get Sanchez (FYI I got a feeling that isn’t going to work out all that well.)
It was so bad the Cheifs basically spent a few weeks telling their fans that they were going to way overpay for a talent because there was nothing else they liked and couldn’t move out of the pick.
Conversely come late in the draft when there are value plays on the board teams start coveting those 1st rounders and a savvy team can move down and accumulate some real value in the draft. AKA NE.
In any event a 1st rounder tomorrow for a 2nd rounder today is the going rate.
I really can’t agree with you on if it could have been 11 or 8 games. The Bills game probably should have been a team they could have beaten at home but Carolina and San Diego were beasts to play away and several of our loses were complete and utter disasters. The games we did win were often offensive blowouts that went to the final drive.
Don't jump off the cliff but if the guys next to you are loud and annoying try to push them off.
by Kfustud on Apr 27, 2009 2:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dumb move-and Alphonso Smith is not the issue
I think he will be a very good player but the way you get him (or not at all) is to use your second round pick to move up. Even if you over pay a little you keep your first round pick. With our schedule next year and all of these changes to adjust to that could be a high pick. You have to think that way, you have to be realistic.we are going to need that pick. I can’t believe the people at this site are not all over this, be fans but don’t be ridiculous. This is an Al Davis like move!!!!!!!
by Lisa FB on Apr 27, 2009 5:57 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
good comment Lisa
but I think realistic is we simply can’t afford 4 first rounders in two years. If it is a high pick as you mention it will only cost more and be harder to trade.
Moreno in 2009! - Check
Mays in 2010!
by Steve O' on Apr 27, 2009 6:36 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
true...and let's just say for instance:
Denver does bad next year, and so does Chicago. Say we’re both 4-12…
That puts Denver, in all likelihood, with the 3rd and 4th pick. Who wants to pay for 2 extremely expensive, high first rounders? Especially after drafting 2 first rounders the year before…I sure as hell don’t. That’s a lot of bread invested in 4 players that haven’t proved anything, or haven’t done anything outstanding for our team.
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win" -Brandon Marshall
by Joe Medina on Apr 27, 2009 12:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Those high first rounders are worthless. Biggest problem with the NFL right now is how worthless they are. You way overpay for talent that is only considered marginally better than that coming up later in the round.
Teams were begging this year to get out of the top 10.
Don't jump off the cliff but if the guys next to you are loud and annoying try to push them off.
by Kfustud on Apr 27, 2009 2:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the high picks are going to be that way for a long time...
you’re absolutely right in the fact that high picks don’t do much more than 2nd or 3rd rounders. only a certain few stand out. LT, etc.
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win" -Brandon Marshall
by Joe Medina on Apr 27, 2009 3:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What they should do is let a team seed itself at what pick it wants. So the worst team could choose pick 10, then the next worst might choose pick 11 etc.
I bet you the SB champs would get a top 5 pick every year.
Don't jump off the cliff but if the guys next to you are loud and annoying try to push them off.
by Kfustud on Apr 27, 2009 4:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
puh-leeze
an Al Davis move would be to take the fastest WR in the first round instead of trading down to grab him in the second
we need depth at CB. if champ is out (god forbid) who are the starting CBs? Goodman and…. Josh Bell? Jack Williams?
by lolcopter on Apr 27, 2009 11:36 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not that Al would ever do that...
Because that’d be stupid ;)
by AllBroncsallday on Apr 27, 2009 11:42 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
we have a pick in every round next year! The only reason why smith was not a top 10 pick this year was down to his height!
Sorry the guys a stud!!! He’s 5’9 and I don’t think the lack of 2" is that important,,,,In a vertical height sort of way anyway!!!!
Think about it! even if we pick #12 again next year we don’t get a corner with his talent. Future pro bowler!
by RafaTheRed on Apr 27, 2009 4:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trading picks
I might be mistaken but we did not lose any picks but our natural number one next year all picks he traded were extra pick we had this year. I like what denver did this draft. All the players are tough and smart and team player and competitive. It seems that Denver hasn’t had player with fire in them since Al wilison and Rod Smith. I think Denver is going to be alot better than people think.
by salasj on Apr 27, 2009 7:13 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Great Post Steve...I'm loving this surge of positive posts !!
.
.

.
Playoffs here we come !!!!
Guardian of the Gate to La La Land!
Little, Wright, Atwater, Davis, and Sharpe...
Why are they not in the Hall...I just don't understand.
by Mike Clark on Apr 27, 2009 7:28 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Mike, can I get a LaLa Land banner in here please
things are looking up!!
Moreno in 2009! - Check
Mays in 2010!
by Steve O' on Apr 27, 2009 10:33 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure thing!!
.
.

Guardian of the Gate to La La Land!
Little, Wright, Atwater, Davis, and Sharpe...
Why are they not in the Hall...I just don't understand.
by Mike Clark on Apr 27, 2009 11:25 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You would have drafted Ron Brace 12th overall?
In an average DT year most people were saying that Brace would be a 4th-5th round pick best specifically last years draft. Your going to pay millions of dollars to a guy who would usually have been drafted on the middle of the second day? That is almost as foolish as taking Tyson Jackson 3rd overall. In a Decent 5 tech DT/DE year he would have been a third round pick. And Denver would have considered him at 18.
by maritimebronco on Apr 27, 2009 7:54 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly Maritime...why is it everyone..
That we have one of the best DC’s in the game, who is an expert on the 3-4 and we dont take any NT types until CFA with Baker (who is the ONLY prospect to play in a true 3-4 scheme0, Pedscleaux who can play DE/ NT and Rulon Jones who may be a DE type.
Does it now make you wonder……just a little bit….about how good Brace and Raji truly are?
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 27, 2009 8:22 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Does it now make you wonder……just a little bit….about how good Brace and Raji truly are?"
Since McD is from Boston, I figured he would have some insight as to Raji and Brace, so maybe that says something (but then, NE ended up taking Brace, I believe).
Growing older is not for sissies. Jack Palance
by bradley on Apr 27, 2009 8:27 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good points...
NE HAd to take a NT type, and they took the one that cost them the least. With both Wilfork AND Seymour up in FA next year, they had to take a punt on Brace, as either one of both could be lost.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 27, 2009 8:28 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Almost Like
NE planning ahead for the future is almost like how Denver took a bunch of DBs…
Don't jump off the cliff but if the guys next to you are loud and annoying try to push them off.
by Kfustud on Apr 27, 2009 2:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Knowshon Moreno:
Regardless of what you think of the pick you have to like the guy’s personality and attitude.
His mannerisms and smile remind me a little of Carmelo Anthony.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 27, 2009 8:03 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Ugh...
I love Moreno but hate Carmelo….
You won’t see Moreno doing this: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4410889144887288309&ei=o8H1SejNBI-0_AGh__3JCg&q=carmelo+fight+slap&hl=en
The slap and run, a real classy move.
by studbucket on Apr 27, 2009 8:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll admit that Melo has a bit more of a….uhhhhh….let’s say ‘edge’.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 27, 2009 8:33 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn't that be called
A run-by slapping? ;)
by AllBroncsallday on Apr 27, 2009 11:43 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
drive-by shootings are soooooo 1994.
run-by slappings is what it’s all about. :)
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win" -Brandon Marshall
by Joe Medina on Apr 27, 2009 12:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Totally
LOL
Fair disclosure, I stole that line from “Mrs. Doubtfire” when Robin Williams hits Pierce Brosnan in the head with a thrown lime.
“It was a run-by fruiting!”
by AllBroncsallday on Apr 28, 2009 10:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not trying to justify it...
but at least he was standing up for his teammates. And that one did did swing at him first.
Okay…maybe I am trying to justify it. ;-)
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 27, 2009 12:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
ahem...meant to say, "and that one dude did swing at him first".
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 27, 2009 12:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
give it a rest
Melo isnt the same kid that played in NY. The operative word in kid.
somethings wrong, Trying to conquer these fears i thought were gone. And it's been so long, I'm dying to live in a world i don't belong
by broncfanstuckinsd on Apr 27, 2009 3:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
yep...
actually Melo and Cutler went through pretty much the exact same situation with their respective teams in terms of being shopped in the offseason.
The difference is that Melo handled it with class and maturity (for the most part). Cutler, on the other hand, not so much.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 27, 2009 3:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was a Defense first guy on Friday
But after looking at the draft in it’s entirety, I truly believe we are not going to struggle at all this year. Yes we have a TOUGH schedule, but after the Moreno pick, the reigns of potentially the best offense in the league were handed to Orton. I believe he will be our starter and I believe he will do better than he did in Chicago.
The best thing out of this weekend was the fact that the #1 pick we traded was ours….not Chicago’s. I believe that says Coach M believes their pick will be better than ours. I agree with that assessment. Bottom line? We are going to win now….not after a couple of rebuilding years.
If it comes down to needing a “franchise” QB next year, which I don’t believe will happen, then we are probably going to have to trade up to a 1 or 2 spot anyway so what’s the big deal…..
by Broncotodd on Apr 27, 2009 8:31 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Great post Steve O'
Well-thought out, well written, the whole boat. The expected starting DBs are old, and an infusion of youth was more than necessary. We have the vets to both solidify the now and help nurture the future. Rec’d.
by Douglas A. Lee on Apr 27, 2009 8:37 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Thanks NYC
I really appreciate the RB posts you have done that prove what the numbers really say!
Moreno in 2009! - Check
Mays in 2010!
by Steve O' on Apr 27, 2009 9:24 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very nice
I lke the post very insightful. Honestly when McD was first signed i wrote a post on how i wanted Spagnoulo and what not. I was very dissapointed. Now that i’ve put things in prespective though i think befroe i dislike him or anything about his system i will atleast wait until he coaches an NFL game before i really know wether he’s gonna lead our team in the right direction.
THIS ONE'S FOR JOHN!
by IamMileHigh on Apr 27, 2009 9:22 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
After reading these comments its clear that...
This is going to be an exciting year. I hope. I’m just anxious to see if this team can be competitive each and every week, and I really believe that we will be. It’s going to be a whole new experience watching the Blue and Orange play football this year. I think that’s the most exciting part. What is McD scheming right now for Moreno, Hillis, Royal and Marshall? I can’t imagine, and sure enough, it will be keeping defensive coordinators up at night next season. If our defense can just stop the occasional third down we’ll likely be more competitive.
How we play next year is a complete unknown, right now, and I find that very exciting. I think the Broncos had gone stale these last 5 or six years, and I’m looking forward to a change new thinking can provide.
We don't devote nearly enough scientific research to finding a cure for jerks. - Calvin
by solace on Apr 27, 2009 9:41 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Ncie POV Solace...and agreed!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Apr 27, 2009 9:49 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Boydy
I just wish we didn’t have to wait until September to find out. This is going to be a looong summer. Hopefully the baseball season can keep me distracted until then. :)
We don't devote nearly enough scientific research to finding a cure for jerks. - Calvin
by solace on Apr 27, 2009 10:18 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice Work Steve-O!
You break everything down very nicely here. It’s very difficult to judge a draft. I mean, who knows how these guys will turn out? However, the one thing that you can take away from what transpired over the weekend is the coaching staff’s and front office’s feel for the team they have, which you break down quite nicely. From what I gather, our staff felt we were too soft on offense, that the secondary was a couple of injuries away from the abyss, and that the front seven didn’t require a massive rookie infusion.
Are these guys nuts? I guess we’ll find out. All I know is, I’m excited to see how it unfolds.
"Talking tough is easy when it's other people's evil and you're judging what they do or don't believe. It seems to me you'd have to have a hole you're own to point a finger at somebody else's sheet" -- Mike Cooley
by ButteBronco on Apr 27, 2009 10:13 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Butte
Like you say, we gotta wait and see!
Moreno in 2009! - Check
Mays in 2010!
by Steve O' on Apr 27, 2009 10:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Post Steve-O
I like this draft, and I like McD’s philosophy. How far have we gotten with Shanny drafting for need? I love Mike Shanahan and what he did for our Broncos as a coach. However, his personnell skills left much to be desired. I know people are aggravated at all the change but could we have kept going the way we were and been in a SB in a couple years? I don’t think so. There was a need for major change and we are getting it. I think it is rediculous to judge McDaniels until we start playing games. There have been a few trolls around here who keep spouting that we are becoming Patriots West and that it is a bad thing. I’m not saying I like Bellichuck and I disagree with his morals. However, if we are bringing in high character guys with a determined work ethic and a strong focus on team play, we will improve dramatically. Also, as for becoming “Patriots West” anyone here can raise their hand who would NOT like to win 3 Super Bowls over a 4 year span. Good teams tend to be hated and I think that is where most of the anti-Patriots sentiment comes from. Every team that has been a dynasty in this league was hated while they were dominant. I wouldn’t mind that. GO BRONCOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We gotta get nastier on D!!!!!!!!!
by Broncofan on Apr 27, 2009 10:30 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks man!
Is it September yet?!?! Thanks for the nice response too!
Moreno in 2009! - Check
Mays in 2010!
by Steve O' on Apr 27, 2009 10:36 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did I already say great post? Can't remember!
Who cares! We got Moreno!
(flying chest bump)
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 27, 2009 1:52 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
flies back
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win" -Brandon Marshall
by Joe Medina on Apr 27, 2009 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's so funny you say that!
Since day one my fiancée asks, “what do you want for dinner?” I say “who cares, we got Moreno”!
(flying chest bump back with a high five)
Moreno in 2009! - Check
Mays in 2010!
by Steve O' on Apr 27, 2009 2:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a key point:
“Once it was determined that our front seven needed some tweaking not changing then the draft was destined to go in a direction that we didn’t anticipate. We the fan just see the terrible results and automatically think our players stink. "
We as fans have been caught off guard by this draft because we do not see the talent and needs on the team in the same way as the coach. Hopefully, he knows best. The other half of that is that we do not see the talent of the draft prospects in the same way either. For example, NT Chris Baker was rated as a 2nd-5th rounder and went undrafted.
As far as value, I am fine with the Smith pick. In fact, I think that he is going to become one of our favorite Broncos. I only worry that we may have lost our leverage to obtain an elite NT or QB (if we need it) in next year’s draft.
The other question mark for me, was trading the two 3rd rounders for Quinn. I understand that he is essential for making McD’s offense function, and I think he too is going to become one of our favorite players, it just seems like he would have been available at 3a.
The third question mark for me is that they didn’t take an ILB. So far, they haven’t signed a UDFA ILB to my knowledge. Maybe they feel like they are set with Davis, Larsen, DJ, Haggan and Woodyard. Still seems like they could use some depth there. Maybe someone has a good explanation?
Last, I think that we should be excited about some of our UDFAs. Signing NT Chris Baker made the draft complete (minus an ILB and elite DT, which just wasn’t available) for me. DT Everette Pedescleaux is a good prospect. I am really excited about CB Dominique Johnson. He is tall and fast (6-2, 190, 4.38 40 time). My guess is that he will win a place on the roster and contribute.
Good post!
by Orange Crush II on Apr 27, 2009 2:25 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Crush
nice comment! I appreciate the perspective!
Moreno in 2009! - Check
Mays in 2010!
by Steve O' on Apr 27, 2009 3:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Knowshon moreno
The reason we drafted Knowshon was bcause it was a Know-brainer. Obviously we are gonna go back to pounding the ball..On d we definetly got Ball hawks..The problem is we have had to many turnover and not enough takeaways…People this isnt rocket science, it is football. Draft the toughest kids that are smart and you build a smart tough football team…I think we have as good a chance as any to become a respected team again..Our team is only going to go as far as are offense and defense take us..Players decide who wins and who loses not coaches…
by rockymtnthunder on Apr 27, 2009 3:03 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Getting more and more excited for the upcoming season
I guess I’ll keep my DirecTV Sunday Ticket now- got it because I don’t live in Colo anymore- and regardless of how the draft went I am really happy that crybaby lose your way out of the playoffs every year Cutler is gone ! Franchise quarterback (NOT!) Shanahan’s repetetive act had gone stale too. I’m still wondering where the linebackers are going to come from.
by keeroc on Apr 27, 2009 3:57 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd
Kudos to you and Zappa for predicting the pick. I didn’t see it coming.
You deserve to enjoy the glory. And your take on the matter was proven correct. And now, all of Denver will get to enjoy your wisdom.
Good call my friend!
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Apr 27, 2009 8:00 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks HT
For me it’s not about being right but rather hopefully showing there are different options and different ways to run a football team. I have always thought Denver’s best asset was Bobby Turner and the ZB scheme and as I said before I think we need to maximize that asset. Moreno just turned our running game from a family physician to Dr. James Andrews!
Moreno in 2009! - Check
Mays in 2010!
by Steve O' on Apr 27, 2009 8:35 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




























