Debunking the myth that championships require a strong passing offense

While I am certainly excited to see what Orton can do with our offense in 2009, I think most of us would probably agree that we wouldn't be surprised if our offense was statistically less impressive this coming season. Of course, there's always a chance this may not be true with regards to points (we know we have a first class receiving corps and offensive line, and a better than decent prospect for starting QB) but I think our farewell to the rocket arm more or less guarantees us fewer passing yards.


That said, I figured why not take a look at the enviable Superbowl Champion teams of the past 10 years and see how they measure up with regards to total passing yards in the regular season. How important is it to have a passing offense that ranks in the top 5 - or even top 10 - in the league?

I know i'm not the first to bring this up (there's been another post or two that have referenced the lack of correlation between passing yards and wins), and this certainly isn't any sort of earth shattering find =), but for those of us who may not look at stats much (or at all) I thought I'd put together this brief summary to shine some light on the subject..  Where have the passing offenses of the past 10 Superbowl championhip teams stood in relation to other teams in their SB winning season?

. . . .

Year      Team               Ranking

2008     Steelers           17

2007     Giants              21

2006     Colts                 2

2005     Steelers           24

2004     Patriots            11

2003     Patriots             9

2002     Buccaneers    15

2001     Patriots            22

2000     Ravens            22

1999     Rams                1

. . . .

The average ranking is 15th  in the league (exact avg is 14.5, but rounding up). While we all understand that good defenses are often responsible for winning Superbowls, I (perhaps naively) was still surprised that the average ranking of Superbowl winning passing offenses was so low. With the exception of the Rams in '99 and the Colts in '06, the rest of the teams didn't even rank in the top 5.

Again, probably isn't too surprising, but perhaps may be educational for a few of us out there =) .. (it was for me).

If you go back another two years to include the Broncos' championship seasons, the average drops to 13.33. And if you go all the way back to the '85 Bears it drops to 12 (Redskins and 49ers brought it down a few points), but the average still doesn't fall beneath 10th place. AND, as you can see from above, there is clearly a great deal of variation, which just goes to show what we already know, which is that great TEAMS (comprised of an offense and a defense) win championships.

Here's to the pursuit of a well rounded TEAM (offense and defense!) in 2009. Now let's keep working on that defense...

This is a Fan-Created Comment on The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Mile High Report

You must be a member of Mile High Report to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Mile High Report. You should read them.

Join Mile High Report

You must be a member of Mile High Report to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Mile High Report. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.