Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

Zen and the Art of Self-Hypnosis

Nothing is easier than self-deceit. For what each man wishes, that he also believes to be true - Demosthenes, Third Olynthiac, sec. 19

Jerry Angelo of the Chicago Bears was quoted in the Sporting News daily before the draft, talking about his team's quality and chances next year. The same discussion was quoted by Matt Bowen in the National Football Post: 

"Well, I think that it will be better just given the fact that our quarterback is going to play better," Jerry Angelo told the Chicago Sun-Times. "I feel that will be something that is going to help that position and really the whole offense overall. If we stay status quo and nobody gets hurt, with our present receiving corps - and when I say ‘receiving corps you guys have to bring in the tight ends, too - I feel we'll be OK.

Angelo conceded that the Bears need to add depth to the wideout unit, whether through the draft or as an acquisition after the draft. He was serious, and Chicago drafted wide receivers Juaquin Iglesias in the 2nd round and Johnny Knox in the 5th round as well as Derek Kinder in the 7th.  

"The receiver position is certainly something that we're looking at strongly for the obvious reasons, but I don't want to rule out other players at other positions," Angelo said before the draft, "We're never going to rule out defensive linemen."

Chicago would add two defensive ends and offensive line developmental project Lance Louis out of San Diego State.

 

Star-divide

For those who like an older phraseology, Angelo's original remark was called ‘whistling past the graveyard':  the process of ignoring something in order to keep from fearing it. To quote Chauncey Billups, "Winning is fun, man." Losing isn't. You don't necessarily get more wins by bringing a vertical game QB into a ball control system which is totally unsuited for him and expect miracles. Chicago doesn't throw a lot of vertical passing plays and their system to date has relied on a lot of checkdowns (in part due to poor receiving talent, something that the Cutler trade didn't address) and passes to the running back, Matt Forte. I hope that Orlando Pace stays healthy and that Chris Williams matures, but neither has happened so far. Chicago's tight ends are good, but their receivers have been subpar.

I like and respect Cutler's skills. The fact that he was often lousy in the red zone might have been partly the play calling, but Jay was a big part of that problem and despite lesser weapons, Orton was far better in the shortened field. Does Jerry take into account Cutler's weaknesses? If so, we haven't heard a peep about it. Saying that the QB position will be better is a big jump. Will it be different? No doubt. Better? Perhaps.

Still, at the very least, Angelo needed another good receiver or two, another running back to add to Matt Forte, a few prayers for the offensive line's play and health and a different offensive scheme. At that point, if you can fix the poor play of the defense you're in a good situation. The three young receivers he drafted at least give Chicago a better chance - Juaquin Iglesias is a fine young receiver and may also add a returner skill that the Bears need as Devin Hester attempts to go from brilliant All-World returner to mediocre WR. But without a change in scheme that takes advantage of Cutler's vertical passing skill, the Bears outlook won't be promising. It's the role of the coaches will be the central element that has the best chance of turning the tide for the Bears in 2009.

There was this disclaimer from the NFP:

"Is Cutler in the same mold as a guy like Favre? And do the Bears have the type of receivers, such as Devin Hester - who Angelo thinks needs to take another step forward at the position - who can come together as a group and excel under a talent like Cutler?

Angelo thinks they can. "We have a good receiving corps that complements one another," he said. They also added Oklahoma rookie Juaquin Iglesias, whom Angelo is high on after selecting him in the third round of the draft. "Iglesias gives us that big guy across the middle."

The verdict is still out on this group, and I'm on the fence too, but Angelo believes he has the tight ends in Greg Olsen and Desmond Clark to complete the package. "When you talk wide receivers, you have to count the tight ends," he said, something he discovered when talking with Patriots coach Bill Belichick about the struggles the Patriots had trying to contain Chargers TE Antonio Gates."

This last part is a fair point that I've made before - that the Bears TEs, former Bronco Desmond Clark and Greg Olsen - are a big strength - but a moment before, Angelo had been talking about the vertical passing game, and generally the TEs aren't much help there. Clark and Olsen are good, but as a standard part of the vertical game, they aren't the answer. So, what is Angelo actually saying?

 "Our receiving corps has a chance to be decent," said Angelo. "But, we feel good about our offense."

Our receivers might get decent but, we feel good? That was a wonderful slip of the tongue in which Angelo reveals that he doesn't think that their receivers are that good either.

Well, unless the receiving corps is better, there's no reason to feel all that different about the offense. Let's break this down: no one so far has argued that Orton was incapable of throwing to the TEs or to Forte, nor that Clark and Olsen were the problem. The claim was that the problem with the Bears offense was Kyle Orton, ostensibly because he couldn't throw the long pass. If you just got Cutler in order to have him make the same throws, you're wasting a lot of money. But this is a ‘magic bullet' solution that has gained substantial national fervor. If you have a new QB with certain strengths and some weaknesses, but ones that are different from the QB you had, suddenly all is well. You need a new perspective, a new offensive scheme and new approaches to make this trade worthwhile.

Why am I nattering on about the Bears, Angelo, receivers and Orton? In case you were wondering, here's how that reflects on the Broncos: The biggest thing that Josh McDaniels had to offer the Broncos may have been an outside perspective, getting them past the ‘whistling past the graveyard' stage that permeated offseason discussions in Denver over the past few years.

Management fiddled around while the Broncos defense burned our chances of success. Having that situation be over is a gift by itself. The Broncos hd reached the point where the constant believe that they wre just a few pieces away from winning it all had actually kept them from winning. There comes a point in the evolution of things where you have to cull the deadwood and permit new things to grow and flourish. The Broncos seem to be in that phase. Hopefully, new things will emerge for them and will prove that this path was well worth taking.

This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR

Comment 14 comments  |  9 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Agreed Doc, in order for the patient to heal properly, one had to cut away the bad tissue and start anew...

I do feel that McD has addressed the issues on all three phases of the ball, only time will tell, but I am excited!!
Go Broncos

Real Power, comes with the realization that One cannot change the Moment;
only ones perception of it: Atitude! JQM

by UB3 on May 25, 2009 1:57 PM MDT reply actions  

They were missing passes all day long in practice,

and that wasn’t in a presser, pressure situation. The problem may lie at the feet of those receivers not being able to perform to the level jay is capable of. This may present a frustrated quarterback with no alternative but to lash back at his receivers, and relie on the tight end-runningback pass plays. This should hold down the amount of interceptions thrown but will probably limit the amount of success. If it comes down to this, defenses will have a field day and the end of the bench will again be comforting for a pouter. There very well could be trouble in Chicago.

by bfree2bronc on May 25, 2009 2:09 PM MDT reply actions  

Zen? More like delusional thinking

As we see so many times, there is a lack of critical thinking which prevents the searching self analysis needed to address your deficiencies. We can applaud Mr. Bowlen for an honest appraisal of his team and taking a new direction. McDaniels has taken a critical look and addressed deficiencies, not glossing over the obvious flaws. The right QB for the system seems to be needed in Chicago and I’m not sure Cutler fits the bill.

by Ponderosa on May 25, 2009 5:09 PM MDT reply actions  

Mr. Angelo

seems to portray himself like an uninformed fan. If the majority of Bears faithful are this way, he will fool them for another years’ salary.

With the 12th pick, the Broncos select Knowshon Moreno - Roger Goodell
That'll move the chains - Andy Samberg

by KaptainKirk on May 25, 2009 8:40 PM MDT reply actions  

IMO the Bears have been fooled for a long time.

And, it wasn’t no different for us if you (not necessarily pointed at you per say) really set your man love toward Shannahan it was basicaly the same way. It was the Shannahan way or the highway, that’s the way was. He maneuvered himself into the position he was in as soon as he presented the Lombardi trophy to Pat. Pat let his guard down focusing on the shiny, coveted mantle piece and gave up to much control (costly business move). Shannahan is a slick operator, he got to the top and the wedged himself into the door. He got on the gravy train and rode it as far as it would take him. His coaching as of late (the past few years) became pathetic. Pat probably saw the writing on the wall but didn’t know what avenue to take (Shannahan and him being friends and all). IMO I believe Pat Bowlen was planning this coaching change for a long while. This new coach we have is young, and he’s smart, and hopefully Pat has learned enough from the last shenanigans not to let it happen again. JMHO.

by bfree2bronc on May 25, 2009 11:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

What about DJ Williams?

But wait, here is DJ Williams: "In my personal opinion, I loved Coach Shanahan," Williams said. "He’s a great coach. Honestly, I put that on the players more than anything. We had a three-game lead with four games to go. You can do all the coaching you want, but the players still have to play the game."

So let’s get this straight. One of the best players on the roster doesn’t think it’s the coach at all but the player’s problem. So you either have to admit one of two things. Either the OP is full of caca, as this site is so many times. Or you have to admit that McDaniels is screwing up at Denver because he’s not getting rid of the players who are causing the problem. But wait, McDaniels is GOD is so that can’t be right. I guess the OP is full of nonsense.

DJ Williams still thinks the team is just a tweak away. And if that attitude is the problem, why is he still on the team?

by Tuttifrutti on May 29, 2009 10:13 AM MDT up reply actions  

A unique article indeed and thanks for the post. Okay, first I don’t believe that Kyle was their problem (before his ankle injury, he played well) it appears to lie with the o line and the receiving core. A qb can only throw the ball, he can’t teach the guy to create separation and make the catch. They need better receivers in order to maximize the effort. They appear to want to keep the notion that as long as they have Jay, they’re fine. That’s not true, if you didn’t want to pay for the supporting cast then why did you go get him? All receivers are not the same and that’s why teams are highly selective in the ones that they choose and are willing to pay the money for them. i saw that tape of them practicing and I hope that it pans out for them, but if you’re serious about this trade then why are they still trying to make hester a receiver? He is a punt returner…that’s his job. You can claim to open the playbook, but from what I saw it looks like the same game plan. Jay Cutler is not a “dump off” passer and is not accustomed to doing that type of plan. TE’s are nice to have, but elite receivers aid in the production. He is not the qb for that job-it doesn’t cater to his ability. I don’t care what Jay says, he called Plaxico because he needed a receiver for the type of game plan that he wants used. Saying we use the west coast offense and actually using it are two different things. I’m not sure what Angelo’s game plan was as to why he traded for Jay, but I think he had more pressing issues.

Needagoodtime!

by Loveforjoy! on May 26, 2009 2:28 AM MDT reply actions  

So close, but so far away

I really like your point about how Denver was suffering from the idea that they didn’t succeed b/c they were only missing one little piece. That is such a fallacy. Teams that don’t succeed b/c of one little piece (that are good teams) end up losing in the AFC Champ. game or semis, not missing the playoffs.
I wanna put that shoe on the Bears. The Bears are the ones who are gonna pay this year b/c of thinking that the team is only missing one piece. If it was 2007, right after the SB, then they would have been right….they only missed a QB. Last year, they had a QB. The problem was their defense, their receivers, and their OL. Having not fixed any of those, JC better be as good as advertised. No way that team is better than 9 wins this year. I even loved their draft picks. I think the NFC North gets real tough this year and the Bears, having created a perfect storm of pressure and lack of judgment, implode to 4-12. The more I read about Angelo, the more the wins decrease……Thanks!

by BideshiBronco on May 26, 2009 4:27 AM MDT reply actions  

great post, Bear

You really hit the nail on the head with this:

The biggest thing that Josh McDaniels had to offer the Broncos may have been an outside perspective, getting them past the ‘whistling past the graveyard’ stage that permeated offseason discussions in Denver over the past few years.

We’ve been completely mediocre for the past few years – and yet every season was our big season where we were going all the way – especially now that Shanny had his next Elway. Whistling past our defense, our special teams, our predictable play-calling, our mediocre offensive efficiency…Thank goodness Bowlen got tired of buying into it and hired a fresh pair of eyes to do the complete renovation that we needed.

"From the get-go, we targeted a certain type of player: tough, smart, competitive, versatile, a good person that loves football and wants to win." -Coach McDaniels

by Colorado_Kitten on May 26, 2009 10:19 AM MDT reply actions  

This is about the Broncos...

not Cutler, not the Bears, etc

Great writeup, Bear.

You so very consicely say what I evangelistically belive when you say:

The Broncos had reached the point where the constant belief that they were just a few pieces away from winning it all had actually kept them from winning. There comes a point in the evolution of things where you have to cull the deadwood and permit new things to grow and flourish. The Broncos seem to be in that phase. Hopefully, new things will emerge for them and will prove that this path was well worth taking.

I think that there were issues on the offensive side of the ball as well (albeit a bit less obvious), and specifically in the red zone and they were ignored because Shanny was somehow going to find some garbage heap RB to run for 1500 yards and 22 TDs one of these years – even though that never happened, and we did this because he drafted TD and Mike Anderson (which, come on – let’s be honest, had to have a huge degree of pure luck built into both selections because of the risk of age/injury). Its been a very long time since I was confident (2005) that Denver was a “punch it in” offense. Denver did it in the TD years and wasn’t extremely efficient for a long period of time with it. Portis was a very good back and I don’t have the time to extrapolate, but he scored in the red zone, although I’d be interested to see if most of his TD’s were runs over 5 yards out because he had trouble when the D stacked for the run (or maybe that’s just selective memory). Mike Anderson had some good stints, and for a few games last year, I thought Hillis was going to be able to do it, but the offense in general has been a real heartbreaker for me.

How good can they be when their points per yard is in the 17’s over the last 2 seasons, which is much worse than it was with Plummer under center. I mean, in 06 – they scored about 20 a game. In 07 – they score right at 20, last year, we score 3 more, so 23 a game. Basically, Denver’s offense is one a field goal per game better than it was when we benched Plummer and Rod Smith was our #1 WR. Something’s missing. Denver’s offense was a yards machine last year, but so were the Saints. Both teams went 8-8.

by super7 on May 26, 2009 10:41 AM MDT reply actions  

That's a great perspective, super7

Thanks for the good comments folks. I really did believe that we were going downhill by the end of last season. The stats would later Bear that out… Yes, I have wondered if Angelo is caught in Shanny Syndrome – believing that this one piece is the pill for what ails you. I know that Ron Turner has been quoted a few times recently talking about how he needs to redo much of the offense – I just wonder if a run-first WCO will either be maintained or if a QB change from one set of strengths and weaknesses to another is really that key.

Hillis/Moreno in '09

by Doc Bear on May 26, 2009 11:45 AM MDT up reply actions  

I agree with that...

I think Cutler will actually be great – regadless of personnel in Chicago because I genuinely believe that division is weak. I think any near-elite QB will have magnified numbers (yards, TDs, wins) in that division. I even think Farve’s been grossly overrated since the 96 and 97 in GB (his best and most consistent years were 1994-1998). He had 7 years with a rating below 88 (5 of those were in the mid to low 70’s!) and the other 5 years he was in the mid to low 90’s. He absolutely dominated that division. I don’t know if it was the lack of additional talent or the lack of competition, but I think if you put Favre in the AFC in from 1998-2007, I’m not sure his numbers would be what they are. What I’m getting at is that I think Cutler will have stats just like Favre’s (both bad, like INTs, and good, like Wins) for the next 8 or 9 years, but I can’t see him ever getting to the level of a Manning/Brady who would dominate ANY division.

I guess I have a bit of AFC bias, just like I have American League bias in the AL (grew up a Red Sox fan). I don’t think any smart and successful pitcher from the NL should EVER consider moving to the AL unless they’re Pedro Martinez in the 90’s, conversely, if I was a young stud pitcher in the AL, the smartest move I could make is to try and get traded into the NL. Sure, I have to bat, but the talent level isn’t as consistent from team to team, although I bet NYCbroncosfan would argue that now that his Mets stole a couple in Fenway this weekend, but that’s for another sbnation site.

by super7 on May 26, 2009 12:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

Its no surprise

Angelo evaluated Orton on something the Bears offense was not even designed around .Didnt the Bears just let Berrian a legit deep threat walk ? and replaced him with Marty Booker and Brandon Lloyd ? If you google 2008 nfc north predictions and if you were to buy into Angelos new mantra of how the QB drives everything then Orton shouldve been his guy

Ive always believed that when your team cracks under adversity then something is seriously wrong internally . I think Bowlen saw that and brought in McDaniels to get a straight answer .

by strategik on May 26, 2009 11:08 AM MDT reply actions  

One good point in all of this....

…is that we have an owner who is able to see what is needed. A great owner is (perhaps) one of the most under rated needs for a good team. (Conversly, look at Al and the raiders).

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on May 27, 2009 4:39 AM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Haleycriesalot_small
Pre-Free Agency Thoughts
Ph_small
2011: MHR I Need Your Help With An Upcoming Post
Zozobra_small
Explaining What "IT" Is that Tebow Has: An Analysis of the Art of Miracles
Pumpkin_small
The risk/reward analysis on drafting RBs earlier vs later
Images-2_small
Calling out IAOFM

Recent FanPosts

La_la_land_small
Kids In A Candy Store
Small
A Shot at a Mock
Small
Broncos positions of need – off season 2012
0_1979_ford_f100-sequin_small
My GM box 2.0
Pimp_hand_-_the_pimp_hand_is_strong_in_this_one_small
Questions about the Spread Offense
Small
CHEAP SKATES
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
The Updated Solution
Pumpkin_small
MLBs - what we have and what Fox and Del Rio historically want
Small
It's the most wonderful time of the year!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

Dadndaughter_small Tim Lynch

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Position Coach

Flag_canada_small Colby

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall

Small zsheely

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk