A Lesson On Leadership
It’s no secret that the Denver Broncos have become a "drama-queen" in terms of media coverage this NFL offseason. Shanahan’s departure, Cutler’s bitter exit and now the Brandon Marshall trade speculation continue to provide writers with more fuel for more headlines.
While some have directly attributed reactions of Cutler and Marshall to the rocky transition at the top of Rocky Mountain High, the brunt of blame rests on the players. How they’ve carried themselves throughout the whole escapade doesn’t exactly scream the words " team leader." Personally, I wouldn’t want to root for a team represented by that kind of behavior anyway.
If those players don’t wish to be leaders after all, where does that leave the Broncos? A team in transition needs more than just Pro Bowl performances from a leader. It needs steadfastness, commitment and a mature demeanor. With the upheaval caused (or seemingly caused) by the recent coaching change in Denver, where can the Broncos - a team already in need of a "leader" prior to this offseason – look to for leadership?
It’s easy to get swept up in the drama, but all you have to do is step back for a second and you’ll find what you’re looking for right under your very nose.
The Broncos did something this offseason that’s not getting the press this time of year. Pat Bowlen and company brought in a 13-year NFL veteran loaded with experience and, most importantly, with pure class: Brian Dawkins.
Dawkins recently addressed former teammate Donovan McNabb’s new contract in a Fox News interview. Did Weapon-X have second thoughts about Philadelphia forking money Donovan’s way instead of his way? Mr. Dawkins answered that inquiry with one simple sentence.
"I cheer just as hard when someone gets a blessing as when I get mine," the former Eagles’ safety said.
Like Cutler and Marshall, Dawkins found his state of affairs in limbo this off-season. Albeit both situations exist in entirely different circumstances (Cutler and Marshall are both under 30 years of age and Dawkins is currently 35), the right way to handle oneself remains the same in each.
Cutler wanted out. Dawkins did not. Cutler and Marshall started this drama on their own. In Brian’s case, the Eagles facilitated what became a business decision by choosing not to match an offer from an outside source. Cutler didn’t care about a matching offer.
Furthermore, the Dawkins transaction did not spark anywhere near the same reaction in Philadelphia that the Broncos’ recent issues have in Denver. Most fans blamed Dawkins’ departure on the team rather than the player. Further west, in Colorado, fans have been more apt to blame the player for stoking the drama this offseason (especially in the current case of Marshall).
I know many of us are tired of the Cutler saga and have already moved past it, but I hope you’ll excuse me if I reference it just a bit more for the purposes of this write-up.
First, a quote from Jay Cutler on the situation via an ESPN.com article in March…
I went in there with every intention of solving the issue, being a Bronco, moving forward as a Bronco. We weren't in there but about 20 minutes, [McDaniels] did most of the talking and as far as I'm concerned, he made it clear he wants his own guy. He admitted he wanted Matt Cassel because he said he has raised him up from the ground as a quarterback. He said he wasn't sorry about it. He made it clear that he could still entertain trading me because, as he put it, he'll do whatever he feels is in the best interest of the organization.
At the end of the meeting, he wasn't like, 'Jay, I want you as our quarterback, you're our guy.' It felt like the opposite. He basically said that I needed to tell him if we can't work this out, to let him know. I thought he was antagonizing me and that was disappointing because I was ready to move on, committed as a Bronco. Really, I figured we'd hash things out, shake hands, laugh a little and move forward. What happened [Saturday] was the last thing I expected. If I didn't think it could be fixed, I never would have come back to Denver. It was painfully obvious to me and Bus [Cook, his agent] it's not something they want to fix.
Now Dawkins, from an interview on 950 ESPN Radio in Philadelphia (also conducted in March)…
"Denver came out of the jump, and we didn’t have to prompt them to offer me anything," Dawkins said. "They came out the jump just like this. Not quite where it is right now, but it was close to that. We didn’t have to ask for anything. This is what they came out with, wanting me there. They made it clear right away that I’m not a ‘want’ there, that I’m a necessity. They feel they need me here.""I would say they opened my eyes right away that this was a business deal. That it wasn’t about me being who I am to the team. It was about my age, and it was a business decision. And that really hurt."
"I did not want to get to free agency," Dawkins said. "I’ve never gotten to free agency, I’ve never gone to free agency. I’ve had years in the past where I could have collected big bucks on the open market, but I did not want to get there. So why would I want to get there all of a sudden now on my last contract? I wanted to be an Eagle. And they denied that."
Both players "wanted" to play for their former teams…or so they said. However, who really wanted to stay aboard? If it doesn’t come across through the quotes, maybe it’ll register if presented in another fashion.
Jay Cutler
Brian Dawkins
Two completely different reactions. See if you can figure out which player wanted to be a part of his team. It shouldn’t be too hard. And remember, before you say Cutler had reasons for not wanting to be a Bronco, ask yourself, were those reasons generated by the Broncos organization itself or harbored in the mind of the quarterback himself?
Hopefully my point has made itself clear. No matter what else happens this offseason, Broncos fans should be honored to have a player with the sense of pride in and loyalty to the game of football that Brian Dawkins has.
I could go on and on about the leadership qualities I’ve read about and/or witnessed relating to number twenty-two, but I won’t. Instead I shall point out one more time how a player should carry himself. I will point out that Brian Dawkins is a leader and he comes at a time when the Broncos so desperately "need" one.
No, Dawkins may not have all that much left in the tank years’ wise, but he embodies the kind of character and positive example that players should follow for years to come. He’s the guy you want on your team. He’s also the guy that wants to be on your team.
Instead of the players Denver has lost, let’s think about the players the team has gained. Brian Dawkins may not be in Colorado for long, but his mentality and behavior should linger (not just in the NFL, but in all sports) for eternity. That’s what the Broncos are getting and that’s the kind of example that defines a TEAM.
So I say, let’s stop worrying about what the MSM wants us to worry about and stick to focusing on what we as fans know best: the TEAM. It’s June. Regular season football doesn’t begin until about three months from now. Remember, no matter what happens this offseason, we’ve still got the Broncos.
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
24 comments
|
20 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Man, am I glad we have BDawk!
I don’t know if we could have picked up a better player that Brian Dawkins…
He hasn’t even played a down for the Broncos, but he has made this a better team.
Nice post.
There’s been so much crap written in the major media outlets about this rollercoaster ride of an offseason and nearly all of it negative. Probably due to the fact that it stirs up more emotion and controversy than a positive spin would.
I think Bronco fans need to look at this situation as almost a rebuild with sights set to 2010 and beyond as opposed to the 2009 team. There’s just so much of a transition going on right now to realistically think that the team can put it all together this year.
A player like Dawkins will provide an outstanding example of leadership and commitment to the young core of the team as it moves forward. Not too many other players in the league can hold a candle to what he’ll do in the dressing room and on the field as a leader. Maybe that’s why the Broncos made him a “need” more than a “want”.
Side note on Dawkins; you’re right, a lot of Philly fans do blame the team for Dawkins’ departure. Just that that team is the Broncos and what they say was their ridiculous overpay that the Eagles shouldn’t have matched.
by Streams Of Whiskey on Jun 16, 2009 6:39 PM MDT reply actions
Thanks for the comment.
I think Bronco fans need to look at this situation as almost a rebuild with sights set to 2010 and beyond as opposed to the 2009 team. There’s just so much of a transition going on right now to realistically think that the team can put it all together this year.
I completely agree with you there. Obviously not give up entirely on the season, but have that “rebuild” type attitude where you sit back, don’t expect too much, and enjoy the ride (if, of course, it is to be enjoyable).
Also, I hear your final side note loud and clear, however a lot of fans I know personally put more blame on the Eagles for not keeping him around than the Broncos. I’m from the area, so I’ve gotten to watch Dawkins play over the years, and I personally have to admit I was sad to see him leave and I think he still belongs in Green and Black. However, with that said, what’s done is done and it doesn’t mean I can’t start to get excited about him in the orange and blue uniform :)
Finishing up that point, I think almost all fans had the IMMEDIATE reaction of blaming the Eagles. As you said, however, once the details came out in the week(s) to follow, then yes, the blame did shift. My point there was to mention that the blame went deservedly to the teams doing the deal rather than on the player for immaturely forcing the deal. Hence, the character guy B-Dawk is. I’m glad there’s been additions like this in the offseason. It gives me something great to focus on as a Broncos fan along with guys already on the squad like Hillis and Royal. Helps me drown out a lot of the speculation and MSM “drama” if you know what I mean.
Maybe it's just me....
but I’m not really sure how the Broncos are to “blame” for anything relating to Dawkins becoming a Bronco. A team (Philly) didn’t want to pay one of their most beloved players of all time and another team (Broncos) in transition and in desperate need of defensive skills and leadership was happy to make him a very nice offer (which he accepted).
Whether they “overpaid” or not, how is it the Broncos fault that they made an offer (money that comes out of their team funds and they are free to spend any way they wish and has no impact on the Eagles whatsoever) and Dawkins accepted it? Blaming the Broncos for doing what they have every right to do with their own money makes absolutely no sense to me. If it hadn’t been the Broncos, I guarantee you it would’ve been someone else since it was clear the Ealges weren’t willing to offer Dawkins anything close to what he was looking for. And it’s Brian-Freakin’-Dawkins! Even at 35, players like him don’t become available every day! Plus, as has been stated on MHR many times, with a team that’s in as big of a transition as the Broncos, and how horrendous and uninspired our defense was the past few years, why WOULDN’T we do whatever we could to secure a player and leader of Dawkins caliber?
I understand Philly fans being upset about losing Dawkins and most certainly weren’t going to blame him (as they shouldn’t). And maybe many didn’t want to blame their own team either. So maybe it was just easier to focus their anger and frustration on the team that they feel “stole” him away as opposed to their own team who let him “get” away. But I think that’s an emotional reaction rather than a logical one (we know something about that around Bronco Country the last few months). However, it still makes no sense to me. I mean, show me where in the world things work like that.
For example, say I (Philly fans) want to buy this nice house (Dawkins) that I’ve had my eye on for years. I envision living there, raising a family there, fixing it up and adding on, having holidays and BBQ’s and making lots of great memories there. I’ve even talked to the current owner and expressed my interest and they said as long as I pay whatever asking price they come up with, the house is all but mine. When the dream home of mine finally becomes available I make a fair and reasonable offer which is basically their asking price, so I assume it’s all but mine, as I was told. Then some rich guy (Broncos) from out of town with much more money who only wants it for a vacation home a few times a year swoops in and makes what I feel is a ridiculously high offer and ends up getting the house. Fair? Maybe not. But is it THAT rich guy’s (Broncos) fault that he has the means and desire to purchase the house, even if it’s at, what I feel, is an inflated price? Of course not. And most people aren’t going to say that guy did anything wrong, except maybe me (the Philly fans) because I’m the one who lost out. The analogy isn’t exactly perfect because I don’t think the Eagles made a fair offer to Dawkins, they already technically “owned” him instead of wanting to get him new, and the Broncos aren’t richer than the Phillies, but it still illustrates the main point and question…. how are the Broncos to blame for making an offer to a player who then accepted the offer. By that rationale, if you blame the Broncos, then you also HAVE to blame Dawkins as well. He DID accept the offer that some feel was too high. Sorry folks, the world just doesn’t work that way. One person (or team) is free to spend whatever amount they have and want on something (or someone) else. And if that something (or someone else) accepts the offer and you lose out, too bad. Welcome to the real world.
At the end of the day, I’m not sure anyone really is to blame. The Eagles made a decision about their own financial situation, Dawkins and his worth, and made him an offer. Dawkins felt the offer was ridiculously low, other teams felt he was worth more and made him a much higher offer. And Dawkins accepted it. Done and done.
If you want to blame anything, blame the business of the NFL; it’s just the way it is sometimes. Everything else is pretty much irrational and unfair. That’s my opinion, anyway.
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world." - Calvin from Calvin & Hobbes
by RockyMtnHigh on Jun 16, 2009 11:56 PM MDT up reply actions
Great opinion.
I was actually leaning more towards more of the fans placing the blame on the Eagles myself instead, but I had to also consider the fact that a lot of Philly fans did “come around” if you will and (not blame the Broncos), but remove blame from the Eagles after they found out how much money Dawkins got from Denver. Also, I’m with you on the ‘blame game’ issue. Why blame anyone? The thing is, a lot of fans out there need someone to “blame” for things like this. In the Dawkins situation it was purely a business transaction throughout, from the player to both teams involved…that’s how it works.
However, in the situation with Denver, a lot of this falls on the players’ shoulders. I don’t think that’s the right way to do it, but you’re gonna see players like that continue to act immaturely at times wanting out (although not all the time). Like you said, it should be about the business of the NFL rather than some player who “doesn’t feel like playing” for the team he signed a contract (that he has to honor) to play with in the first place.
I understand....
where you were coming from, phantom. I was just referring to comments made at various points above that some Eagles fans were somehow upset with and blaming the Broncos for the Dawkins situation. Which then just started my little rant about blame and no blame and on and on…. :-)
Great post, by the way!
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world." - Calvin from Calvin & Hobbes
by RockyMtnHigh on Jun 17, 2009 10:08 PM MDT up reply actions
Remembering
what Ray Bourque did for the Avalance and Chauncey Billips is doing for the Nuggets. What’s not to LOVE about Dawkins?
Although the leadership wasn't as drastic as Chauncey/Nuggets
Neil Smith also had a pretty good effect on our Super Bowl teams’ defenses…
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win" -Brandon Marshall
Great post and Rec'd. Enough said!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
+1----Rec'd ofcourse
Real Power, comes with the realization that One cannot change the Moment;
only ones perception of it: Atitude! JQM
I posted this on another thread, but it belongs here
The youth of today just don’t have good morals or values
Everything is centered on selfishness and greed. We all know that youth is wasted on the young. As we get older, we tend to gain a little wisdom. It helps if you have someone worth looking up to. These guys don’t seem to realize that younger kids try to look up to them and they should set an example.
With the 12th pick, the Broncos select Knowshon Moreno - Roger Goodell
That'll move the chains - Andy Samberg
have to disagree here
I agree with alot of things you say, KaptainKirk, but I have to disagree with you here. I think this is an unfair generalization.
I think it’s true that the malcontents often get the most coverage. But that doesn’t mean they’re in the majority. I don’t have much interaction with youth, but I’d say I’m very encouraged by the morality and service-oriented attitude of today’s youth.
For every Brandon Marshall, there’s an Eddie Royal. Maybe 10 Eddie Royals. Maybe 100 Eddie Royals.
I think you’re being unfair here.
But who will guard the guards themselves?
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Jun 18, 2009 12:08 PM MDT up reply actions
It’s funny that you brought up Dawkins because I did watch him play when he was with the Eagles. I also remember that one of the people that Josh signed (sorry, I can’t remember his nme) said in an interview that one of the things that Josh said was that he wanted to win right now and leave the rebuilding to someone else. Had those people known what was going to happen after they signed, I don’t believe that they would’ve “stepped foot” into Dove Valley . The guy you got from the colts even said that he has never played with an “average qb.” There is NO proof that today’s youth don’t have morals- you DON"T know what happened between Josh and Jay and it’s not really fair to blame him for all of this. IT’s NOT Jay or any other athlete’s job to be the inspiration for kids because they are NOT role models. Their people who make mistakes like everyone else. Just like it’s not fair with your saying which one wants to be here- Cutler had been through alot and I believe the eagles offered Dawkins a fair amount based on his age and they weren’t going to tell “young talent” to leave. I don’t know any other team that would’ve paid him $20 million because he’s near 40 and closing out his career. He has good leadership, but it doesn’t help much on the field when his receiver can get by him. In short, you don’t know what happened and trying to label one wanting to be here over the other is ridiculous. There’s no need for Jay to be crying about it- he CAME to Denver to try to fix the problem and it didn’t work. HE DOESN’T NEED TO CRY FOR YOU IN ORDER TO VALIDATE YOUR POINT!
Needagoodtime!
agree to a point
The disagreement point: it may not be in an athlete’s job description to be a role model, but whether or not they like, they ARE in fact role models.
I’ve been working with junior high school students for twenty years, and there are a lot of them that talk about wanting to be like this athlete or that athlete. I see many of them trying to emulate their favorite players. When they look around and see players who are getting into trouble, they don’t tend to say to themselves “Oh I want to go get myself in trouble” but they do tend to imitate the showboating, and some of the smug, “me-first” attitudes that they see. Without guidance, some of them will adopt those types of attitudes and run a strong risk of having the same kinds of social problems.
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
by Brian Shrout on Jun 17, 2009 12:21 AM MDT up reply actions
I like your thoughts Loveforjoy, as always.
IT’s NOT Jay or any other athlete’s job to be the inspiration for kids because they are NOT role models.
Except for that one. If I’m not mistaken, aren’t all players obligated by the NFLPA to donate time at least once a week to a charitable organization such as YMCA? I know we’ve all seen the same 4 ads over and over, but I know players have to give time to the United Way as well. If that’s not being a role-model for kids, nothing is.
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win" -Brandon Marshall
Agreed...it is EVERY pro athletes job to be a role model...
I instill that in my athletes, and EVERY coach should.
A comment lie that will really fire me up!!!!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
We ALL should be role models
But it isn’t the kids we betray if we aren’t: it is ourselves.
Being a role model is an opportunity to help shape and redirect the values in the world around you, especially in young people who still have so much to contribute and in so many ways.
It is about living in a world that you create, that reflects your values. Does it make a lot of other live beter by proxy? You bet it does. You simply can’t lose by being a positive influence on others.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Jun 17, 2009 4:10 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
And THAT is how any individual
can make the world a better place single handedly
With the 12th pick, the Broncos select Knowshon Moreno - Roger Goodell
That'll move the chains - Andy Samberg
Role models
Yes yes yes!!!
Regardless of whether it is fair or or right – PRO ATHELETES ARE ROLE MODELS FOR KIDS. Kids look up to them, they emulate them. And often these are kids who don’t have a male role model in the house.
The influence atheletes have influencing kids towards good or evil is enhanced because of their status. They can help or damage far more kids by the way they act than normal man-on-the-street.
This is not something they can decide is not true, it just is true. Some of them take on this responsibilty and I applaud them mightily. Others do not.
by Bronco Fan Doug on Jun 17, 2009 6:49 PM MDT up reply actions
I just wanted to use the reactions following the transactions to further illustrate character. Crying has nothing to do with it….it’s actually more the words the two respective athletes have uttered and the way they went about using those words. Dawkins could not have broken down during the interview and we’d still have a point here. I never said he NEEDED to “cry” in order to validate this point. All those videos do is give further insight into a man that loved his team (at the point he was leaving it) in Brian Dawkins…again, two different situations…two different ways to handle them.
I also hope you know what I meant when I said a certain player wanted to come. I wasn’t trying to label one over the other at all, because you’re right, I don’t know what happened. However, what I was trying to call attention to is the way both these players reacted in the public eye and public spotlight of today’s MSM world. One deal was done more quietly, while the other carried on for about a month. Yes, I know, again, two different situations, but it doesn’t mean you go and blare you own trumpet and turn aside some of the fans who used to support you by the way you handle your business.
This article was about positive character, a positive demeanor…and positive character does MORE than just provide a positive role model for kids. It wasn’t about Jay, or BMarsh, or negativity per se, more than it was about something positive for Broncos fans in a time like this in this offseason. I’ll stay out of the whole role models argument (because that’s something one could debate forever), but I just wanted to clarify a few particular points. It’s not about who to blame, rather it’s about why some of these players even get blame in the first place.
You totally missed the point
And yes, like it or not, athletes ARE role models.
by AllBroncsallday on Jun 17, 2009 8:51 AM MDT up reply actions
Interesting points LFJ.
And I do agree with allbroncs that you’ve probably missed phantom’s primary point. Not sure i agree with this one either
Had those people known what was going to happen after they signed, I don’t believe that they would’ve "stepped foot" into Dove Valley . The guy you got from the colts even said that he has never played with an "average qb".
For 20m and the committment the Broncos showed Brian he would be here with or without JC and BM. As for the others are you really postulating that they came here because of JC? Especially considering that the general buzz around the league (see probowl press) was tilting toward “prima donna”. It’s far more likey they came because they liked what Josh was selling ie.. system, team, character and they liked the $$. Everything I’ve seen and heard from the OTA’s and minicamps has been that the players are working hard and enjoy the environment.
As for the role model statement “Charles Barkley I amn’t” like it or not they are. The question isn’t “are they a role model” it’s “are they a positive or negative role model” and of course the players who are negative role models and in denial claim to be no role model at all.
"as in football so in life"
Rec'd
Dawkins is a real leader and a real man. Cutler, maybe not so much so.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
Great Post phantom...Thanks
Guardian of the Gate to La La Land!
Gonsoulin, Taylor, Little, Wright, Gradishar, Atwater, Davis, and Sharpe...
Why are they not in the Hall...I just don't understand.
by Mike Clark on Jun 17, 2009 7:51 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs

by 


























