Mile High Report: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Cutler/Shanahan Failed (the fixed version)

I'm writing this because I'm frustrated.  Not with anyone here at MHR or the conversation on Orton, but with the focus of the comparisons/criticism/outlook.  Once again, this isn't a knock on ANYONE (ok maybe Soloman Wilcotts) just what I view as a missing point that makes all of these......thoughts not gel well with me.  I keep hearing that the Denver Broncos of 2009 aren't going to be as good as 2008.  But, the only REASONS given are #1. Losing Jay Cutler and #2. Losing Mike Shanahan.

Someone at MHR recently published a FanPost that included a fun little "pretend" conversation between McD and Pat Bowlen during the interview process.  It had McD saying something along the lines of "Here's how I'm going to fix our Offense."  That got me thinking.  Was our Offense broken?  I'm a pretty simple man, straightforward and to the point.  After looking at the numbers, YES, our Offense was absolutely broken.  The 2008 Chicago Bears, devoid of a receiving corps, had a better Offense than the Denver Broncos.

Team

G

Pts/G

TotPts

 Plys

Yds/G

Denver Broncos

16

23.1

370

1,019

395.8

Chicago Bears

16

23.4

375

991

295.9

Kyle Orton is NOT Jay Cutler.  And Jay Cutler is NOT as good as he is being published to be.  I was blinded by the incredible arm, the fantasy production and all those beautiful yards.

Whether Orton can or cannot complete the deep ball is worth talking about (I guess) but what's being overlooked is WHO he had to throw the ball too.  Chicago's Offense was disgusting last year.  In fact, it's pretty freakin hard to find a comparable team from a passing/receiving standpoint.  Is ANYBODY going to say that Devin Hester is a #1 Reciever?  Quick, name the top 3 WR's from Chicago's 2008 team and I already gave you one of them.  The top two players (from a reception standpoint) for the Chicago Bears were the running back and the tight end.   Three of the top 4 weren't wide receivers and Devin Hester was the one.  Who in their right mind would expect Orton to be completing 40+ yrd bombs on a regular basis?  Here are the receiving stats for last year:

Receiving Statistics

Player

Rec

Yds

Yds/Rec

Long

TD

Matt Forte

63

477

7.6

19

4

Greg Olsen

54

574

10.6

52

5

Devin Hester

51

665

13.0

65

3

Desmond Clark

41

367

9.0

35

1

Rashied Davis

35

445

12.7

36

2

Brandon Lloyd

26

364

14.0

32

2

Marty Booker

14

211

15.1

51

2

Jason McKie

11

64

5.8

12

1

Adrian Peterson

6

45

7.5

19

0

Kevin Jones

2

5

2.5

3

0

Jason Davis

1

12

12.0

12

0

I tried to find a team that had a comparable receiving corps and the best I could come up with was the 2007 San Diego Chargers and it's HARDLY a fair comparison.

 

Receiving Statistics

Player

Rec

Yds

Yds/Rec

Long

TD

Antonio Gates

75

984

13.1

49

9

LaDainian Tomlinson

60

475

7.9

36

3

Vincent Jackson

41

623

15.2

45

3

Chris Chambers

35

555

15.9

44

4

Craig Davis

20

188

9.4

18

1

Brandon Manumaleuna

10

86

8.6

40

1

Darren Sproles

10

31

3.1

14

0

Legedu Naanee

8

69

8.6

22

0

Lorenzo Neal

8

23

2.9

9

1

Malcom Floyd

7

97

13.9

25

0

Michael Turner

4

16

4.0

12

0

Kassim Osgood

2

23

11.5

15

0

Andrew Pinnock

1

5

5.0

5

0

It's fairly obvious why this isn't a fair comparison. Gates>Olsen and as much as I love Forte I'm NOT going to put him in LT's class yet.  Also, Vincent Jackson is a better receiver than Hester any day, PLUS, the Chargers did acquire Chris Chamber prior to week 8 to help fix this particular receiving threat problem.  In any case, this was the best comparison I could come up with quickly.  Now let's look at the QB stats as Apples to Apples.

Passing Statistics

Player

Att

Comp

Yds

Comp %

Yds/Att

TD

TD %

INT

INT %

Long

Sck

Sack/Lost

Rating

Philip Rivers

460

277

3152

60.2

6.9

21

4.6

15

3.3

49

22

163

82.4

Kyle Orton

465

272

2972

58.5

6.4

18

3.9

12

2.6

65

27

160

79.6

Now that looks a bit more in line with what I was thinking.  Is there a SINGLE professional analyst that would go on record saying Phillip Rivers isn't an excellent QB?  What I'm getting at in this particular section is that Orton did a fine job given the receiving options he had at his disposal.  In fact, he (and the rest of the Bears Offense) did better than OUR QB and Offense.  They scored MORE POINT.

What's important to me is Points.  For all the flash and stats of Cutler, he FAILED.  Shanahan FAILED.  Why would any professional analyst (Solomon Willcots, Adam Shein, insert name here) think that the Bronco Offense will be WORSE this year than last?  I simply don't get it. 

I know this is dragging on but I wanted to show one last group of stats.  These are the VERY FEW QB's who have attempted close to 600 passes in a season over the last two years.  Cutler is Far and Away the least impressive of the group.

Player

Team

Comp

Att

Pct

Att/G

Yds

Avg

Yds/G

TD

Int

Lng

20+

40+

Sck

Rate

Kurt Warner

ARI

401

598

67.1

37.4

4,583

7.7

286.4

30

14

79T

50

12

26

96.9

Drew Brees

NO

413

635

65.0

39.7

5,069

8.0

316.8

34

17

84T

66

16

13

96.2

Tom Brady

NE

398

578

68.9

36.1

4,806

8.3

300.4

50

8

69T

56

15

21

117.2

Drew Brees

NO

440

652

67.5

40.8

4,423

6.8

276.4

28

18

58

47

8

16

89.4

Carson Palmer

CIN

373

575

64.9

35.9

4,131

7.2

258.2

26

20

70T

51

8

17

86.7

Jay Cutler

DEN

384

616

62.3

38.5

4,526

7.3

282.9

25

18

93T

55

7

11

86.0

The lowest completion %, the least TD's, the most INT's and the lowest QB rating.  All of this while having the least sacks, an excellent receiving corps and the Mastermind as the Head Coach. 

Please!!  Somebody.  Explain to me why the Broncos are going to be worse offensively this year than last.  Why are we going to miss Jay Cutler?  Why is McD such a step down from Shanahan?  The facts simply don't support it.

This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR

36 recs  |  Comment 97 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

That last table is very surprising.

I’m down with your message, Kdo09. I also like the table comparing Rivers and Orton. I plan on using this information the next time my Oakland Raider fan bugs me about our new QB. He didn’t like me bringing up the won lost records of Orton and Cutler, maybe he’ll appreciate this more.

Rec’d

We don't devote nearly enough scientific research to finding a cure for jerks. - Calvin

by solace on Jun 24, 2009 1:30 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Great stuff K. Rec'd

All you get from drafting the "best player available" is a team full of good football players.

by orangeblood on Jun 24, 2009 1:31 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice

I especially liked the Rivers/Orton comparison as well. Why would any professional analyst suggest that the Bronco offense will be worse this season? Cutler vs. Orton on arm talent alone (shallow), Shanahan vs McD on track record of NFL accomplishments (dated) and the need during this evidence-less time of year to go negative on somebody as an analyst can’t go positive on everyone and the Broncs are an inviting target. Relax! Just walk around with that sly knowing smile.

It's "just" football

by Donkhead on Jun 24, 2009 1:49 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Excellent K....nice post. The Rivers vs Orton thing is HUGE...

I think Rivers shaded Jay as best QB in the AFC West….due ti being clutch when needed.
Rec’d.

Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.

by boydy2669 on Jun 24, 2009 1:49 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Are we going to be worse than 2008

In a word NO!

rec’d for great analysis. Thanks for pointing these things out. This quote from above, IMHO, sums up why everyone thought our offense was so great:

blinded by the incredible arm, the fantasy production and all those beautiful yards.

Fans in general, and the M(B)SM in particular use a Fantasy Football view of offense. In FF, the largest factor is on yards (which also happens to be the way the NFL chooses to rank offenses). It’s simple, easy to measure, and usually fails to be an accurate measure of the effectiveness of an offense.

Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.

by BShrout on Jun 24, 2009 1:52 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes, but man, when Jay was "on"

he was FUN to watch. The sheer force and distance and accuracy of some of his passes were so exciting!

I agree with you… I just had to take a moment to revel in some of Jay’s plays as a Bronco (and forget the others). I fell asleep some Sunday nights this season just dreaming about Jay dropping back and launching a missile into the end zone. I loved it. Those were the GOOD times. I know there is a dark side.

-Harvey J. Neptune

"Practice doesn't make perfect. PERFECT practice makes perfect." - Vince Lombardi

by HarvJNep2n on Jun 24, 2009 11:51 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pucker was bad, too

I agree that he made some unbelievable throws as a Bronco (and will probably do so as a Bear), but there were lots of times he gave me chest pains with his triple-coverage throws. It’s pre-season still, but I’m thinking I’ll like Mr. Slow&steady over Mr. Nervesofsteel this season. A reduction in INTs will go a long way toward making it enjoyable to watch the games. :)

by BroncosBassist on Jun 25, 2009 5:44 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed.

In my twisted, desperate attempt to draw comparisons, ORTON follows the same vowel/consonant pattern as ELWAY. hmmmmmm…… LOL. I just think this season we are putting Orton into a position to be productive.

-Harvey J. Neptune

"Practice doesn't make perfect. PERFECT practice makes perfect." - Vince Lombardi

by HarvJNep2n on Jun 25, 2009 9:26 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

OMG

that is totally hilarious, I wish you’d shared that earlier so it could have been included in the 13 reasons to believe in 13-3 post. LOLOL

Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.

Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It

by BShrout on Jun 25, 2009 12:18 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

WOW

You would think that this has been a slow quiet off-season, with all the time we have on our hands to study anagrams(?) and numerology………………………….MHR is the best!!!!

LOL

To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also DREAM; not only plan, but also BELIEVE.

by Broncobh on Jun 25, 2009 1:40 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exciting one way or another.

My heart always went into my throat when Jay dropped back to pass. I had a pretty good idea he was going to throw it into coverage. Most of the time, it turned out to be thrilling… But then those other times…

by Velveeta on Jun 27, 2009 11:39 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

launching a missile into the end zone?

You must have been dreaming… : ) Of course, I guess you didn’t say that anyone on our team actually caught it. ; )

I kid! I kid! I do believe I’m gonna miss Cutler, too. For all the darkness, the light was pretty bright, as well. I certainly believed in him at the time and had high hopes for his future. To bad we didn’t have Kubes around longer to train him up properly. I wonder what kinda QB coach the Bears have?

"They need a hero to tell them that the impossible can become possible..... WHEN... YOU'RE... AWESOMMMME!" -- Rhino the Hamster

by broncosmontana on Jun 25, 2009 3:20 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

"for all the darkness..."

that makes me think of those movies that you watch where the cahracter with the flashlight just keeps shining the damn thing in your (the moveigoer’s) eyes.

Pet peeve of mine.

There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.

by Jeremy Bolander on Jun 25, 2009 4:00 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not a Fox Mulder fan either, I bet. ^^

"They need a hero to tell them that the impossible can become possible..... WHEN... YOU'RE... AWESOMMMME!" -- Rhino the Hamster

by broncosmontana on Jun 25, 2009 9:53 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good question, broncosmontana

Try naming three Bears QBs in the past 6 years. No luck. Oh, heck, just try naming one that made the top 10. Hmmm, no luck either. Ok, name a QB that Ron Turner ever worked with that made the top 10. No?

Fair enough. Turner isn’t a bad OC – in fact, he guided them to the SB in January 2007 (2006 season). He was with the University of Illinois as a head coach for 8 seasons. He and Lovie Smith are up front about the fact that they are run-first coaches. Despite that, they have produced over 3000 yards passing in each of the past three seasons.

So, what was the problem? Well, to hear Turner and Smith tell it, the whole problem was Kyle Orton. If he’d just been a better QB, they would have been golden. There are just a few little problems with that particular revisionist history, but that’s the issue from Turner’s perspective. It’s also fair to note that the Bears, under Kyle Orton, had surpassed 4600 yards of total offense for 2 years running consecutively. I don’t see that as problematic – Smith and Turner do. The solution to them is a big armed QB with better accuracy.

What remains odd about this is that they are now talking as if they aren’t really going to add in much in the way of vertical passing. They just want a guy who is a ‘better QB’. They honestly feel that if they have that (and the Defense doesn’t get injured) they will have a good chance of winning the SB. I’ve gone on record as saying that if you just want a guy to do essentially what Orton did, use the money on a better line (they did) and better receivers (currently up in the air) and you’ll have a better outcome. They disagree, and both Smith and Turner know a lot more than I do. We’ll see how it all goes – I’m sure that with the better O line (still needs help, but it is certainly potentially better) and such new receivers as they have (they feel that Bennett will mature, and beating his stat line of Zero won’t be hard, they think that Hester will mature and they think that they have a couple of good draft pick receivers – I agree with the draft pick part and wish them well with Hester. Will Cutler improve things? Some, I think.

Hillis/Moreno in '09

by Emmett Smith on Jun 26, 2009 10:46 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not Sure Chicago was Looking to Replace Orton

Remember the Bears said early that they were happy with Orton and were not going to make a play for Cutler. I remember that specifically, because I was still feeling spiteful and was relieved that at least Cutler wouldn’t pout himself onto his boyhood team. Then Chicago obviously changed their minds (maybe Denver approached Chicago because McD liked Orton?).

Thus, I’m not sure this happened because they were down on Orton or his abilities. With all the revisionist history already happening around Cutler at that time, with Cutler’s undenied talent and potential, and with that fan base aching for that ‘franchise’ QB type, this was the perfect time to roll the dice and take a shot at greatness. I think thats closer to reality than the idea that Orton is so deficient that they were intent on getting rid of him.

I think Denver encouraged Chicago to enter the derby because they like Orton. Not vise versa.

I am an idiot walking a tightrope of fortune and fame
I am an acrobat swinging trapezes through circles of flame
If you've never stared off in the distance, then your life is a shame
and though I'll never forget your face,
sometimes i can't remember my name.
--Counting Crows, "Mrs. Potter's Lullaby"

by PredominantlyOrange on Jun 27, 2009 11:09 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1 BShrout

"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra

by KaptainKirk on Jun 26, 2009 8:19 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Incredible

You broke down the numbers to clearly show how JC (too funny with the initials) is over-rated and Orton is under-rated. I for one and very much looking forward to what Orton can do this year.

Great work and thanks for the reference to my post on the McD, Bowlen interview. I think McD really came to show Bowlen how the O was not as strong as everyone thought and accepted it to be.

There is no I in team.

by LovedemBroncs on Jun 24, 2009 1:53 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm not a numbers guy.

But your work is clear, makes sense, and pursuasive.

Very, very rec’d!

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jun 24, 2009 1:57 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

+1, very, very, very, Very Rec'd

Real Power, comes with the realization that One cannot change the Moment;
only ones perception of it: Atitude! JQM

by UB3 on Jun 24, 2009 2:23 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice work Kdo

I’m sitting here with a big smile because the more I hear from our new coach the more I feal like we will surprise a lot of people this year. Rec’d

It is better to keep silent, and appear to be wise, then to ramble on and remove all doubt! The Wisest Man, Solomon.

by metalman5050 on Jun 24, 2009 2:16 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Receiving Corps

I share your frustration.

I’m writing this because I’m frustrated. Not with anyone here at MHR or the conversation on Orton, but with the focus of the comparisons/criticism/outlook. … But, the only REASONS given are #1. Losing Jay Cutler and #2. Losing Mike Shanahan.

Zealots on both sides of the Jay Cutler issue annoy me. Yet the comparisons with Orton and between the Broncos and Bears are useful. I really like that you’ve added comparisons with the Chargers. Could you add the Broncos receiving corps stats ?

Was our offense broken? They were competitive but could have been, and in my opinion will be, better. Replacing Shanahan with McDaniels? Look at the Tom Brady stats. The point is that the McDaniels offensive system worked better than Shanahans. Bates was predictable and RB’s too fragile. Who have we lost on the offense other than Shanahan, Bates, and Cutler? Selvin Young couldn’t pass the physical. We replaced some other RB’s with proven and experienced RB’s. We drafted a stud RB. All the other players and coaches stayed. (Well, we’ll see how the Marshall drama works out.) All in all I am also puzzled why anyone would suggest our offense is broken other than their belief that #1 Cutler is God and #2 Shanahan still is “The Mastermind.”

I’ve taken the high road and just ignored the ignorant.

It is impossible to defeat an ignorant man in argument. ~William G. McAdoo

by Endzone on Jun 24, 2009 2:28 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

The points differential

The Bears scored more, certainly. And I’m a big supporter of Orton’s, who I think will run the offense very well and show the kind of leadership that the Broncos have been lacking when things don’t go their way. But it’s likely true that the Bears ST and defense added to the points scored.

Any numbers guys here want to do the world a great service and come up with a points scored comparison that factors in points scored by the defense and on punt/kickoff returns?

That might give a more accurate account of where both teams were in offensive scoring (with qualifications like field position, etc., are also necessary variables to factor in).

by JeffG on Jun 24, 2009 2:32 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Great point on ST

    Even more than ST points, average starting position is going to be a huge factor in the ability of an offense to score. Might average scoring drive yardage vs. average starting position be used to factor the ST effect on scoring?

"My job description is to win football games. I'm a hard worker. I'm not flashy by any means, but my job is to play football and win and I plan to do that." Kyle Orton

by odarol on Jun 24, 2009 4:58 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

There isn't much differences in ST

on both teams. the Bears netted 6.7yds/punt ret and 24.9yds/kick rets while the Broncos 9.8yds and 21.9yds respectively. Assuming the worst case, they all started at the goal line, there is not much glory about ST. The Broncos offense is really shine in passing and rushing, beats the Bears handly in percentage of 1st down vs PA (passing attemps) & 1st down vs RA (rushing attempst). 220 1st dn/620 PA and 103 1st dn/387 RAs for the Broncos while the Bears 153 1st dn/528 PAs and 98 1st dn/434 RAs.

The problem is simply Broncos couldn’t score in the end zone. Doesn’t matter how you slice it, it’s the inability to score, that kills the Broncos season last year.

Words can fool men but Nature doesn't give a damn!

by MadDogExtra on Jun 24, 2009 5:40 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I mean to say

assuming they all started returning at the goal line … 3 yards differential don’t make a whole lot of differences in a real game, except for statistic ranking with percentage.

Words can fool men but Nature doesn't give a damn!

by MadDogExtra on Jun 24, 2009 5:44 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I initially assumed

That Devin Hester, working on special teams, was contributing to the Total Points for the Bears. But, when I checked it out, he didn’t have ANY ST TDs last year. I am guessing they had a few more defensive TDs than the Broncos, but the point remains the same.

by Kdo09 on Jun 24, 2009 5:53 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

in a quick search

I wasn’t able to find defensive scoring. I’d like to subtract those points — and any ST return points — from both the Broncos and Bears in order to best isolate the offensive points scored.

Any help?

by JeffG on Jun 24, 2009 6:51 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think

I found them.
Looks like the Bears had 3 defensive TDs, 1 safety, and 1 Kicking TD

Denver looks to have had 2 defensive TD and thats about it.

by Kdo09 on Jun 24, 2009 6:55 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks!

So that would mean that we’d subtract 30 points from the Bears’ total and 14 from the Broncos’ — making the adjusted totals 356 for the Broncos and 345 for the Bears.

A 9-point advantage over 16 games — given the extra receiving talent and the huge upgrade at O-line Cutler had to work with, and given Orton’s injury — seems hardly worth the kind of money it would have taken to sign Cutler.

Might he have improved? Certainly. But remember, Orton was recruited by Purdue, hardly a QB-weak school. So when you take all this into consideration — the move to the spread offense, the need for team leadership, the potential upside of a guy who is flying under the radar and might take a “system” discount to stay with the Broncos, should he play well this year, and the added bonus of getting Ayers, Smith, and a bit of Quinn in the bargain — I’m not sure how anyone can scratch their heads over the deal.

Unless, that is, you’re one of those people who believes the Broncos need a “face,” and you don’t want that face to wear a seasonal neck beard.

On NFL Total Access today, Marshall Faulk noted that if he stays in Denver Brandon Marshall “doesn’t have a quarterback to throw to him.”

I seriously hope that when Orton starts lighting it up, he freezes out the media folks who have written him off without having done any homework whatsoever.

by JeffG on Jun 24, 2009 7:21 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice research Jeff

I too hope KO will shut the mouth of the MSM. I can’t wait until the season starts and all this speculation ends.

by rollinthunder on Jun 25, 2009 12:07 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is true
On NFL Total Access today, Marshall Faulk noted that if he stays in Denver Brandon Marshall "doesn’t have a quarterback to throw to him."

By the fact that every pass isn’t going his way.

"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra

by KaptainKirk on Jun 26, 2009 8:27 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rivers/Orton Analysis

That’s a comparison I’ve never seen, and it really is fascinating – nice job there.

Would have liked the whole thing better without the random trashing of Cutler at the end. First off, I wouldn’t call him “Far and Away” the least impressive of that group – the last 3 seasons you have on the chart are very similar. Those are also all much more established QBs than Jay. And every one there is a Pro Bowl QB – hardly a shabby group to be considered with any way you choose to spin numbers. I know Cutler isn’t a Bronco anymore, but while he may have been over-rated based on potential rather than production, he is by no means suddenly a terrible QB just because he acted like a baby and went to another team.

by Gorbal on Jun 24, 2009 2:37 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't

Think he is trying to say Cutler was a bad QB, just that Orton isn’t as bad as the MSM paints him to be.

by bchiper on Jun 24, 2009 2:47 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

It wasn’t intended to be a bash. I was just surprised when I looked at the numbers, how poorly His stacked up.

by Kdo09 on Jun 24, 2009 3:17 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, the kid has a ton of promise

If someone can teach him the look off and how to dump off more consistently, I think he starts climbing the over 600 ATT chart.

To me the biggest problem with Jay was that we were installing a work intensive offense, and he couldn’t/wouldn’t put the work in. This made Jay a terrible QB for the Broncos. You can’t go to battle with a man who doesn’t want to learn the battle plan at the helm. Thankfully we were able to get some value for him from a team that didn’t mind the work ethic issues.

The Orton Rivers comparison is the real gem here, I’d like to see a PR campaign to expose this to the MSM (lord knows it would be all they could talk about for a week). But then again, I would rather sneak up on people with a solid QB in Orton when they are clearly expecting a nancy armed illiterate chump.

"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway

by jibbons on Jun 24, 2009 3:33 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny you mention the 2007 Chargers.

They went 11-5 and made all the way to the AFC Championship game. I wonder….

Peyton Hillis is also referred to in early Greek mythology by his other names such as Zeus or Poseidon.

by Joe Medina on Jun 24, 2009 2:50 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

2008 Bears

The defense blew three late 4th quarter leads. We easily could have been 11 – 5/ 12 – 4.

by rocko1 on Jun 24, 2009 3:54 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good points Rocko.

Peyton Hillis is also referred to in early Greek mythology by his other names such as Zeus or Poseidon.

by Joe Medina on Jun 24, 2009 5:16 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oy!

The title says it all. More Cutler v. McDaniels. Will the pain ever stop?

Let the Games Begin!!!

by Baltimore Bronco on Jun 24, 2009 3:41 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

You know, I read on NFL.com about how Cutler will improve the Bears offense

and that the Broncos are worse without him, but then went on to project him to throw 23td and 18int. ??? I am thru reading bullcrap…luckily I get things like this post to read. Thanks man! :)

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

by Tim Lynch on Jun 24, 2009 4:27 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm cautiously optimistic about Orton...

Obviously as a Bronco fan I want him to succeed. And as a bitter ex-Cutler fan I want Jay to be mediocre or fall into a Jeff George type career death spiral. Screw the best wishes and/or good luck, I hold a grudge. :)

Anyways, like I said, I’m cautionsly optimistic about Orton for the illustrated reasons above (well done and rec’d) as well as:

1) His leadership abilities in Chicago and Purdue
2) His extremely impressive college resume and production (in a spread offense no less)
3) His game management ability and win/ loss record in the NFL
4) Work ethic to grasp the new system and be a quality NFL QB (can’t teach that)
5) Ability to read defenses pre and post snap (extremely important)

I think when you combine those attributes with a top tier offensive line, TEs, and WRs you will be productive and win a lot of games. Throw in a little Knowshon and Hillis with a determined and disciplined QB (Orton) you have an extremely dangerous Offense. Sprinkle in McD’s scheme and the sky is the limit.

Go Broncos!

by DBronx777 on Jun 24, 2009 5:39 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

There is a great quote from Sex and the City
Believe me, I would love to be one of those people who’s all; we loved, thank you, you enriched my life, now go and prosper. But I’m much more; we didn’t work out, you need to not exist.

"From the get-go, we targeted a certain type of player: tough, smart, competitive, versatile, a good person that loves football and wants to win." -Coach McDaniels

by Colorado_Kitten on Jun 25, 2009 11:34 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

"Don't be an ass!" --Bill King

by batgirl on Jun 25, 2009 11:40 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great post mate!

I am just waiting for the season to begin and then end. I am excited to compare the 2009 Broncos to the 2008 Broncos, the 2009 Broncos to the 2009 Bears and in particular Orton 2009 to Cutler 2008 & 2009!

After that we will know who is right, the MSM or we @ MHR…

by DjBroncos on Jun 24, 2009 6:22 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Sacks

I’d have to say that the reason Orton had a drop off i think was a combination of being on his back due to a mediocre oline and very bland play calling by the o-coordinator for Chicago.

by BroncoFanInLakewood on Jun 24, 2009 7:17 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

True

It also mattered that he was hurried far more than sacked – we couldn’t find stats on Hurries without going game by game, and even then it’s a judgment call, but it was a common problem. Add to that the difficulties in getting receivers open and Orton’s own normal mistakes and he was in a tough place.

Hillis/Moreno in '09

by Emmett Smith on Jun 24, 2009 10:42 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

In that last group of stats,

you have to give jay credit, he was only 3 years in the NFL, the rest of the group were twice the tenure. Play calling probably was one of the big problems for the offense last year, calling the same plays over and over. jay’s first look to Marshall probably had a lot to do with it too. Bottom line is jay could have gotten better IMO with the coaching at hand, but he is not here and will play with Ron Turners playbook. I have a feeling Kyle Pee’d his pants when he found out he got promoted to the Broncos (no offense Bears fans), and was jumping for joy. Who wouldn’t with Royal, Marshall, Scheffler, Stokely, Hillis, Graham, and now, Moreno. Wow. The blessing have bestowed that young man, and he better take advantage of it while he can. Great Post Kdo09. Oh yeah, that was my post “What In The World Was Pat Thinking”, and I have a sneaking suspicion he may have come right out with that dialog, and diametrically speaking, it was totally necessary.

by bfree2bronc on Jun 24, 2009 8:57 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Love the analysis (and, Wow! for the Brady season with 50 TDs!). Rec'd

I agree, Larsen shouldn’t get any bigger. I am getting tired of his bone crushing hits knocking the pixels off my TV, once they fall to the floor they are very hard to find.

by Arctic Bronco on Jun 24, 2009 8:59 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

highly rec'd

Thanks for the great post!

by CoastalBronco on Jun 24, 2009 9:29 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

First of all, thanks for the article. But it’s funny how these things are written “after” the player is gone. No one would’ve bothered with this had he still been here. He didn’t start great…okay. It’s not how you start, but how you finish the race. Jay will be fine in Chicago because I regard him to be a better qb than Tony Romo (my own). He made mistakes like all of them do, but there’s no way I would’ve traded him. I’ve lived through the “glad he’s gone or he’s sorry” complex. You can be shocked as to what a difference a year can make because I’ve been there. You have Kyle, but that’s no reason to assume that Jay was/will be “bad.” If you believe in early career stats, literally every great qb would be gone because alot started out bad. I had one that went 1-15 and took a couple ofyears to “come around.” We didn’t rely heavily on the “stats” early on and it reaped benefits. Jay is a good qb and I expect him to floursh in the NFC because "youth on youth " has an effect on qbs when they play against each other. Please stop relying so heavily on the stats and put the “notes” away because it’s a learning process for all qbs. I’d still have no problem trading for Jay because he’s still “learning.”

Needagoodtime!

by Loveforjoy! on Jun 24, 2009 11:19 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

You are right

I doubt this would have been written (by a Denver fan site at least) if Jay were still with the team. However, in 3 years, how much real development did we see? We saw Jay learn how to throw the ball away… if he was for sure going to be sacked. But he adjusted by forcing the ball into triple coverage. He had the opportunity to study with Shanahan AND McDaniels, two of the greatest QB coaches and offensive minds. For whatever reason, he chose not to pursue the development with McD. He may yet improve. I hope so. I think of Cutler, especially in Chicago, as a Joe Namath type personality. He’s rough and has a little swagger and I think he can win recklessly. As I said before, he is one exciting mofo to watch sling the football.

But don’t discount the stats. This is telling stuff, if not prescient. Good luck to your Cowboys (my whole family’s team. I’m the Black Donkey of the family).

-Harvey J. Neptune

"Practice doesn't make perfect. PERFECT practice makes perfect." - Vince Lombardi

by HarvJNep2n on Jun 25, 2009 12:01 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

This post

and other posts along the line existed not because JC is traded but it exists because 99% of the MSM can’t write and can’t read intellectually. If the divorce is not messy and ESPECIALLY if the MSM doesn’t pile on it, I doubt there will be many posts like this would exist. Maybe there some just to dissect how horrible the Broncos is in red zone scoring attempt despite a terrific offense show case. So it’s not “funny” at all if you consider the whole situation. It’s our voice against the ignorance and mainly is for our peace of mind, that we said something to defend the unjust. With data off course, because our members demand it.

Words can fool men but Nature doesn't give a damn!

by MadDogExtra on Jun 25, 2009 10:35 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great stuff! Recommended!

Thanks for the info. I like your slant on this thing.

-Harvey J. Neptune

"Practice doesn't make perfect. PERFECT practice makes perfect." - Vince Lombardi

by HarvJNep2n on Jun 25, 2009 12:01 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Ok Ok fine, pass the Kool Aid

I’ll be honest. I really was disappointed when Cutler left. I had just won my fantasy league with him as my QB ($3,600 yeah baby!) and bought his jersey. He was so exciting to watch that it’s tough to let him go. However…
I’ve got to say you guys have really shown me the light. The more numbers I see and the more I learn about McD and his system, I have to believe that this was a good trade. Cutler was not a “check down” QB which is required in McD’s system. Yes, the kid is talented, no doubt, but talent alone do not score TDs, as we all saw last year and in your numbers Kd. I for one can’t wait for KO to show what he can do in McD’s system. Imagine the 2007 Patriots(they went 16-0 for those not keeping track) with a better O-line, better RB’s, maybe a slightly worse defense, and that’s the 2009 Broncos. I for one am pumped up for this year. Anything less than a 10-6 season would surprise me. Pass the Kool Aid, shots on me.

by rollinthunder on Jun 25, 2009 12:25 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Liquid Refreshment

I sure do hope that there will be plenty of beverages flowing in December…. will the system work?

by Baltimore Bronco on Jun 25, 2009 4:17 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks everybody

You guys all rock. I appreciate all the kind words and am glad if …..anyone was able to glean a little from my thoughts. It’s still a bit hard for me to understand WHY Cutler wouldn’t want to play in McDs system. I truly have very little ill-will towards the guy. Anyways, Thanks Again for listening to my “vent”.

by Kdo09 on Jun 25, 2009 6:49 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

your vent was awesomely stated as a well thought out post

thanks for sharing all that you did.

My personal take on why Jay didn’t want to be here has been stated by others in many posts, it just seems like Jay needed a lot of positive reinforcement from his coaches (as in, you’re the 2nd coming of Elway, and you can do no wrong), had a self-confidence that bordered on “I can win each game by myself if necessary” and tied too much of who he was as a quarterback to Shanahan and Bates. Then enters McDaniels who says, “We’ll have a team first attitude in which any player is expendable,” most likely told Jay that he was going to need to depend on the other players to all do their jobs rather than do it all himself, and refused to keep Bates. Add to that, Jay getting some really poor advice from someone, and you get a situation in which Jay believed he needed to move to a different team.

Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.

by BShrout on Jun 25, 2009 7:14 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thorough and well thought out...

Rec’d!

Take my advice... I'm not using it!
Just click your heels together three times and say, "There's no player like Hillis... there's no player like Hillis."

by BroncTastic on Jun 25, 2009 7:48 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

KO - Steady, Accurate, Intelligent, Coachable, Leader.

Great analysis and comparisons, the obvious favorite is with Phyllis and KO.

As most have mentioned I concur the info is logical and comprehensive.
Received – thanks!

by CraigMorton07 on Jun 25, 2009 11:38 AM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Pics

How do you post pics? I tried doing it with pics on my computer. Can this only be done with pics on the internet?

by Endzone on Jun 25, 2009 11:48 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes.

the pictures need a valid url to post.

There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.

by Jeremy Bolander on Jun 25, 2009 4:02 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow!

The first pick is delightful. I need to use that, somehow….

"3rd and 6, Elway shotgun... Elway, scrambling, looking, running-- DIVING!!!-- inside the 5 yard line for a first down! Is he only 37?! How important is this football game? How bad does John Elway want to win this football game? Where you see the quarterbacks go down: Not Elway!"

by Sharpe as a Tack on Jun 26, 2009 3:36 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Endzone, browse for the image on the internet, double-click the image to view it’s path, copy the entire link, and go back to the post. Click the image link (tree) and paste the copied link into that text box.

That’s it.

by CraigMorton07 on Jun 25, 2009 11:53 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

ditto his thanks

I’ve wondered about how to do pics also; CM7, would you know how to set up tables in posts (or excel tables)

Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.

Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It

by BShrout on Jun 25, 2009 12:21 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Everyone will be better

I think JC will be better in Chicago than he would have been in Denver. He out himself in a situation that if he doesn’t correct his bad tendencies then he makes McD look like a genius. To JC that would be worse than death. He would not have had as much incentive to work on these areas if he stayed in Denver. I think Denver will be better because if Denver fails to do well MSM will paint McD as the biggest idiot since Adam ate the fruit. But if McD succeeds without JC, he will look like the greatest genious since Einstein. 6 wins or less he’s an idiot. 10 wins or more he’s a genious. 7-9 the debate will continue for at least another year.

by 3nS on Jun 25, 2009 12:38 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I hope we can keep perspective on the first 2 years 3nS..

     6 wins would not mean idiot in my book if the team shows character and competes well. I’m more intereseted in how they develop as the season progresses. With all of the new players ,coaches, new D system and new O system I’m not looking for miracles.
      Here’s some historical perspective of first year coaches. Tom Landry 0-11-1 (2 SB’s) Chuck Noll 1-13 (4 SB’s) Bill Walsh 2-14 (3 SB’s) Bill Bellicheck 5-11 (3 SB’s) Tom Coughlin 4-12 (1 SB) Bill Parcells 3-12 (1 SB) Tony Dungy 6-10 (1 SB) .
      I want to win now just as bad as anyone but I would prefer that Mcdaniels sticks to a methodical system of steady improvement that will restore the team to consistent excellence over taking big chances on players that are reaches with short term payoff.

"as in football so in life"

by asinsoin on Jun 26, 2009 11:14 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

I’m just saying how I percieve MSM depicting McD

by 3nS on Jun 26, 2009 11:25 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

QB Gold Standard

I’m going to try to upload these pics. First time for everything!

The first shows Hall of Fame Quarterback stats, courtesy of the NFL Hall of Fame

The second shows 2006 through 2008 top rated QB’s, courtesy of nfl.com stats

Of course, you have to factor in that the HOF guys stats are for their entire careers and the QB Leaders stats are for only one year.

Bottom Line:
Pass Completions: HOF 57.71% QB Leaders 64.79%
Rating HOF 81.4 QB Leaders 99.7

Therefore, extrapolating these numbers, if a QB performs in the current game/year above 60% completions and an 89 rating, that is statistically one very good quarterback.

Orton’s career stats are 55.3% and rating is 71.1
Cutlers career stats are 62.5% and rating is 87.1

I’m not suddenly becoming an apologist for Cutler. Obviously statistics don’t tell the whole story. It may be Polyannish, but I think Orton will exceed all expectations here in Denver because of our superior OLine, receivers and revamped RB corps.

by Endzone on Jun 25, 2009 12:56 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

HOF

Hall of Famers played in a different time and different NFL. You’re comparing apples to oranges

by 3nS on Jun 25, 2009 1:04 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes and No

No because those guys are there for a reason. But yes, I am comparing apples and oranges because the HOF numbers are for careers and the QB leaders are only for seasons. I doubt any of the last three year leaders except Manning and possibly Brady will make the HOF.

Actually, the point I was trying to explain is that statistics don’t mean a whole lot. But they can give us guidance.

by Endzone on Jun 25, 2009 1:11 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Something has to be said for the differences in the game itself when comparing QBs like this.

The QBs from the past did not have anywhere near as friendly of a football game to them as the current ones have. Rules differed greatly back then and now. Even between Aikman and today it is a vastly different structure as far as how offensive / defensive penalties are called.

I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.

by sadaraine on Jun 25, 2009 1:53 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent Point

The rules changes and different schemes have significantly changed the game.

What I’m trying to get to is “What is the gold standard for QB’s?”

by Endzone on Jun 25, 2009 2:07 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Suggestion

If you are speaking about the gold standard in today’s game, then compare the top 5 QBs in the league to the rest of them. We really have some exceptional guys to look at as far as the “best” QBs today…Manning, Brady, Brees, etc.

If you are speaking about the hof, then compare the people in it to the averages in that day.

I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.

by sadaraine on Jun 25, 2009 4:05 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Past & Present

Do we then have nothing to learn from the HOF’s to today’s players? I agree that comparing them to the other QB’s of their eras would be interesting. It is just disappointing though that their experience seems to be dismissed as irrelevant.

There are tons of articles, posts, spreadsheets, and so on ad nauseum on how to evaluate a quarterback. It is, after all, the most visible position on a typical team.

I’m concluding that this was a useless exercise based on the comments. At least I learned how to post a picture! :)

Getting back to the thread,

Explain to me why the Broncos are going to be worse offensively this year than last. Why are we going to miss Jay Cutler? Why is McD such a step down from Shanahan? The facts simply don’t support it.

I can’t explain it either.

by Endzone on Jun 25, 2009 4:29 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not at all useless, just not as useful to some of us.

It is always positive to discuss such things and get different points of view.

I’m with you on the thread though…I don’t know for sure why people seem to think our offense will suffer.

I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.

by sadaraine on Jun 25, 2009 4:40 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh

One more thing. I saw all of these guys play. Completions, TDs and avoiding INT’s are no different today than it was then.

by Endzone on Jun 25, 2009 1:13 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree and disagree

Schemes are different in the different eras, which in turn affect all three of those things and many others. McD’s offensive scheme should lend to a higher number of completions because there are higher % of easy throws. For this same reason, it should help avoid INT’s, but I think this solely falls on the QB’s shoulders and his mental maturity to go through his progressions.

Really glad I didn't include any player's names in my screen name with all the turnover we're seeing this offseason...

by ohiobronco on Jun 25, 2009 1:28 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

But the rules were different.

by Broncos_FTW on Jun 25, 2009 2:07 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

BTW

Last Year’s median completion rate was 61.2. Average was 61.2. Highest was Chad Pennington with 67.4, lowest was JaMarcus Russell with 53.8.

Last year’s median rating was 85.7. Average was 84.8. Highest was Philip Rivers with 105.5 and lowest was Ryan Fitzpatrick with 70.

by Endzone on Jun 25, 2009 1:28 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just Saying

Many of the HOFers played before the rule changes in the early 80s therefore under different rules schemes etc. Point is taken let no one dis Bradshaw, Jorgeson, or Baugh. I agree Orton’s # will be good. I wouldn’t be surprised if he gets pro-bowl consideration.

by 3nS on Jun 25, 2009 1:53 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Keep in mind

When comparing points scored in 2008 by the Broncos and Bears:

Chicago’s defense and special teams accounted for 7 TDs. When you remove those ponits from the total you get an average Offensive Points Per Game (OPPG) of 20.375.

Do the same with Denver, who scored only 2 such TDs, and you get OPPG of 22.25.

by JohnElwayOverdrive on Jun 25, 2009 2:06 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't find those same #'s

I found 3 Defensive TD’s and I Kicking TD.

by Kdo09 on Jun 25, 2009 5:30 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Neither do I

I looked at nfl.com, pro-football-reference.com,databasefootball.com and a bunch of MSM.com, and the data is not consistent with each other.

Words can fool men but Nature doesn't give a damn!

by MadDogExtra on Jun 25, 2009 6:05 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why would any professional analyst think that the Bronco Offense will be WORSE?

New QB, new head coach, new QB coach, new offensive coordinator, new and complex offensive system.

I’d be curious to know the average starting point of an offensive drive for the Broncos vs. the Bears last year? That might make me feel better.

Is there any way to measure the impact of offensive skill player continuity on the effectiveness of an offense in the red zone? We went through 18 RBs last year. How might that lack of continuity affect scoring in the red zone. Perhaps it doesn’t affect things so much when moving up and down the field, outisde of the red zone? Just a thought.

Another intangible factor that influences scoring, but is very difficult to measure, is the impact of the worst defense in the NFL in the past few decades on the psyche and decision making of a very young and relatively inexperienced QB like Cutler. How many interceptions or bad decisions are made each game, when the QB knows his defense is likely to let the other team score on the next possession? Conversely, what kind of decisions are made by an older and more experienced QB who has a much better defense? These sorts of factors, which DO impact scoring, are impossible to measure in a table. QB performance does not occur in a vacuum.

by Broncos_FTW on Jun 25, 2009 2:06 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Great post.

No time to comment, but thanks for the excellent breakdown!

"They need a hero to tell them that the impossible can become possible..... WHEN... YOU'RE... AWESOMMMME!" -- Rhino the Hamster

by broncosmontana on Jun 25, 2009 3:22 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Good Work Kdo Rec'd

"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra

by KaptainKirk on Jun 26, 2009 8:44 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Last year was Cutler’s 2nd full year as a starter to say he failed is ridiculous. Chicago’s offense may have been better last year because THEY COULD RUN THE BALL.

by Daemon on Jun 27, 2009 6:27 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Who is saying he failed???

Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.

by boydy2669 on Jun 27, 2009 8:21 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cutler is going to want $100 million

…as a young “franchise” QB.

Franchise QBs — with a running attack that averages close to 5 yards per, with an offensive line that gives up 12 sacks in over 600 passing attempts, and with a set of receivers like Marshall, Royal, Stokely, Scheffler, and Graham — shouldn’t finish 21st and 16th in scoring with those kinds of assets helping them out.

Had Cutler stayed and learned from McDaniels, I have no doubt he would have succeeded in the new system and grown leaps and bounds as a QB. Fact is, he’s a sling and swagger kind of guy, Cutler is, and he’s content to remain that kinda QB.

Can’t say that I blame him — it’s gotten him this far, after all, and lots of NFL people are gaga over his abilities (of course, they were at one point more gaga over Vince Young and Matt Leinart, but let’s bracket that for convenience) — but that style doesn’t work in the kind of offense McDaniels wants to run.

Something had to give. And it did.

by JeffG on Jun 28, 2009 11:23 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

The author of the post

by Daemon on Jun 27, 2009 8:46 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Sorry Daemon

I absolutely think that Shanahan and Cutler failed to provide the scheme/gameplan or implementation of that gameplan. The skill was obviously there, the points weren’t.

The Broncos had a better rushing total than the Bears. They ran the ball just fine, just not in the red zone.

by Kdo09 on Jun 27, 2009 1:22 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!
Start posting about the Broncos »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Baltimore Beatdown
Ravens Game Release: Week 12 vs. Pittsburgh
Mile High Report
Comcast Redzone Report - Behind the losing streak
The Phinsider
Dolphins in the red zone: Week 11

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Kyle_orton_drunk_small
What McGeorge likes about the 2009 Denver Broncos.
Charlotte_1_small
Aussie Meanderings: The Tale of Two Teams (pre and post bye).
Small
Why are we freaking out guys?
Ah-64_apache_helicopter_small
Ryan McBean, the difference maker?
Hpim2076_small
UPON FURTHER REVIEW - The Chargers Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Cpfc_club_badge_small
Tales From Across The Pond Day 3
Hpim2076_small
UPON FURTHER REVIEW-Scouting the Giants
Zoo_080_small
w 12 odds
Tahoetim_small
Upheaval
Cpfc_club_badge_small
Tales From Across The Pond Day 2
Untitled_4_small
Egads!
N1500960434_30298681_247_small
Gasp...The First Broncos Mock Draft of the Year!  Maybe...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Turf Show Times
Making moves at Rams Park
Arrowhead Pride
It's Official: Chiefs S Maurice Leggett to Injured Reserve
The Phinsider
Dolphins vs Bills: Game Capsule

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

MHR Radio

SPONSORS

Web Stuff


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

Cyborg_small Jeremy Bolander

Asst. Head Coach

Mhr_small Steve Nichols

Tahoetim_small Tim Lynch

J_elway_870111_640_small Douglas A. Lee

Plato_bust_small Emmett Smith

Denver-broncos-button_small Ted Bartlett

The-big-lebowski_small TJ Johnson

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk