Want to improve the secondary, move Champ to safety
This has been a topic of debate that traditionally I have been against. I felt Champ’s best value was at CB, yet looking over the past season and watching some Super Bowl highlight films, I have come to the conclusion that Champ needs to be moved to safety. Granted there are some factors against this move, namely he would be the highest paid safety in the league and one generally does not pay safeties as much as a number 1 corner, two we signed two safeties in Dawkins and Hill and it would relegate one of them to an expensive bench player, three is who do you put in at Champ’s spot at CB, and four is would he be able to withstand the added punishment at safety. All of these are valid arguments against such a move, yet I think the short-term and long-term benefits would outweigh all of these arguments.
I think the first myth that needs to be exposed is how valuable a cover corner really is. The fact is that looking back at many of the past Super Bowl teams and their CB tandems were generally solid but not spectacular, in fact their safeties were generally much better players than their CBs. They (the teams) knew that provided the front seven could dominate the line of scrimmage and get pressure on the QB, that they could survive with average to good CB, Pittsburgh, the Colts, even the Pats did not have what I would call dominate CBs, they had CBs that could make plays on poorly thrown balls when the QB was under pressure. Look at the teams with what would be considered to have dominate CB’s (Broncos, Raiders, Chargers, 49ers,etc..), none have what I would consider exceptional defenses, San Diego being the best, but again that was generally due to the play of the front seven, take away a guy like Merriman and their CB’s look very average. Dion Sanders made this myth that a CB could take away a side of the field, granted I think a CB can take away a WR, but this notion that a CB can take away a side of the field is ludicrous. Most offense coordinators will simply run a cover corner out of the play and throw under the routes or over the routes, thereby eliminating a cover corner greatest weapon in getting interceptions.
Many CB have made a successful transition to safety, I point to Rod Woodson being the model that I think Champ could follow. Granted Woodson is a bit bigger than Champ, but both play very similar games. If you watch Champ closely, you will not that he actually plays CB very similar to a safety in that he will play a triangle technique where he reads the QB and the WR at the same time, this technique and style indicate that he should be able to easily transition to a safety position that relies on reading the QB and WR routes versus a strait man-to-man coverage. Many would argue (myself included previously) that Champ would not be able to withstand the punishment of being a safety, I would tend to agree if he is forced to play in the box and be a run stuffer, however, if he is allowed to be a deep safety that can properly set up his tackles and is taking on WR’s more versus RB,TE, and FB, then I think the move would likely prolong his career. Most of the plays that he has been injured on, typically have occurred near or at the line of scrimmage when he has been tackling RB’s and taking on more powerfully built players, he has very good technique and if he is playing further behind the line of scrimmage, he can properly set up those tackles and not have to worry about taking on guards or tackles coming on sweeps. Tyrone Braxton (another CB converted to safety) always said, it doesn’t matter how it looks, as long as you tackle the guy before he gets to the end zone, then you have done your job. Bailey would generally be used as the last man method and I think he would be fine in that position. I think the longer he is forced to play at the line of scimmage the shorter his career will be since teams will continue to run at him in hopes of punishing him.
Filling his shoes at the CB position may be a tall order, but again, a cover CB is only effective if the front seven can put pressure on the opposing QB. Given enough time, most NFL QB’s can beat a elite CB, having Champ in at CB did not make the Broncos a better defense, the Broncos defense was better when they shut down the run and could put pressure on the QB, regardless of who was playing CB. Seeing that the Broncos paid a very steep price for A. Smith this year, he should be starting at CB if they think he was worthy of a potential top 10 pick next year. In addition, having Bailey and Dawkins roaming the back half will allow for the CB’s to play tighter underneath coverage since both Bailey and Dawkins can recover for CB mistakes. But for Bailey to be an effective weapon on defense, the Broncos need to have him covering greater portions of the field and to not be limited to matching up one on one. They need to be able to disguise his coverage, put him in position to make plays on passes, and have the offense guessing where he will be. If a QB knows where he will be, chances are he won’t throw there, but if they can disguise his coverage from moving him to safety, his interception totals should increase and help the defense. By keeping him lined up at CB, we are really limiting what he can do on defense since the opposing offense can devise schemes to limit his involvement in plays.
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
11 recs |
32 comments
Comments
Can't Vote
But that’s a testament to your arguement, Broncoman. Coming in, I would have voted "NO’ to moving Champ to safety…but now I need to think about it some more. I don’t think I will vote “Yes”, but stranger things have happened!
"Don't feed the trolls. Remember to be polite. And please show self-restraint in comment length!" -Me, to myself, because I need constant reminding.
by Disco_Stu on Jun 8, 2009 12:39 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I would not move Champ until he loses a step as a CB.
He could fit in a “Tyrone Braxton” role but not for another year or two.
fader nation is a conquered nation
Jerry Jones is Al Davis with a smile!
by mdierk on Jun 8, 2009 1:01 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
That is my initial reaction too
The assumption is that his skills are transferable to FS, vs. just using that position as a placeholder for older CBs.
I agree, Larsen shouldn’t get any bigger. I am getting tired of his bone crushing hits knocking the pixels off my TV, once they fall to the floor they are very hard to find.
by Arctic Bronco on Jun 10, 2009 12:57 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please MHR, forgive me if I'm wrong in this
But a corner plays man coverage almost exclusively, where a safety is pretty much always zone (unless it’s a run or short pass play, then he covers one guy). If I’m correct in that, then read on, if not, bound me to a tree and duct tape my mouth shut.
Now, I like Champ as a safety, I really do. The fact of the matter is Champ’s been playing zone, even as a cornerback. The problem with that situation (especially in last years case) is that in a lot of cases, he has to do two jobs at once. In a weird, but very logical way, I would love to see Champ as a safety opposite of Dawkins. You could transition Renaldo Hill into a corner position, but I think Alphonso Smith is going to be a starting quality corner when the season starts. Now with that in mind, let’s just say for instance that our secondary looks like this:
FS: Brian Dawkins
SS: Champ Bailey
Strong side CB: Alphonso Smith
Weak side CB: Renaldo Hill
Now, if that were the case, I think our secondary could do some pretty mean work against the pass at all depths, as well as provide a hard second wave of defenders (when the runner breaks through the front 7). In the instance provided above, I believe your biggest asset to having Champ in the SS position is his vision. Champ has the vision of a hawk on the field, and is one of the few dominating corner’s in the league that MAKES plays happen. Granted, a lot of corners make plays, I can remember a few instances where Champ picks that ball away from a guy he wasn’t even defending (in a man coverage situation). Now because of Champ’s vision, I believe he’d make a good SS. The only issue I have with it is his size. He’s not incredibly undersized, and he certainly can make hits, I don’t know if I see Champ taking the “beating” that a safety does as opposed to a cornerback.
Again friends, if I’m wrong in all the assumptions above, spare my head!
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win" -Brandon Marshall
by Joe Medina on Jun 8, 2009 1:05 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Another thought is switching Champ and Dawkins in the safety slots
Since Dawkins is a hard hitter, make him the strong safety, and let Champ be the free safety. I do see Dawkins making the same bone crushing hits that John Lynch made, whereas Champ could be the “third cornerback” in the passing situation and be a man coverage guy in the running game.
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win" -Brandon Marshall
by Joe Medina on Jun 8, 2009 1:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you hit it right with that idea!
It is better to keep silent, and appear to be wise, then to ramble on and remove all doubt! The Wisest Man, Solomon.
by metalman5050 on Jun 8, 2009 7:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would not necessarily say a corner plays man exclusively
Really depends on the CB and the system, if you look at guys like DeAnglo Hall, he can’t play man because he will get eaten alive, but he is a decent zone CB, in fact most traditional Tampa 2 defenses play almost exclusive zone coverage. Champ has been playing man but you are right in the fact that he will often leave his receiver and play zone if he sees the play developing under him, but most teams have gotten wise to that and will basically force Champ to commit early to a WR and then run him far enough out of the play so he really can’t be that effective. I would probably put Goodman as the strong side CB and Smith as the weak side.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Jun 8, 2009 4:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My knee jerk reaction
was to say “no” until I read this comment. It gave me a perspective I had not even considered. Thanks CJ
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
by BShrout on Jun 9, 2009 8:42 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm for moving Bailey to SAF
But not until next year or the year after. He still has the goods and he can do a lot for our future by showing the ropes to our new CBs.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Jun 8, 2009 1:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Interesting Idea BM...
I’d have to agree that with Champs vision and ability to anticipate he’d be a force at FS or SS even after he loses a step. Nice post and rec’d.
"as in football so in life"
by asinsoin on Jun 8, 2009 2:46 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
It is better to keep silent, and appear to be wise, then to ramble on and remove all doubt! The Wisest Man, Solomon.
by metalman5050 on Jun 8, 2009 7:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good points, Broncoman, but I voted to move Champ to offense
Okay, my vote was meant as a goof . But your second point is why we shouldn’t do it:
two we signed two safeties in Dawkins and Hill and it would relegate one of them to an expensive bench player,
But here’s my idea (inspired by your post): on passing downs, when Dawkins will likely come out (like he did in Philly last year) let’s see Champ replace him and one of the young guys (Smith, Williams, Bell) replace Champ.
Growing older is not for sissies. Jack Palance
by bradley on Jun 8, 2009 4:17 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Not a bad idea
I would be for it, last year I was against the move, but after seeing lat season and how he was basically taken out of games because of how an offense ran plays away from him or his side of the field, I would much rather see him have some more freedom in coverage and ability to hide where he is going to be. I just don’t see the bang for your buck in having him play man-to-man and not have any balls thrown his way, I rather see him get some more balls thrown in his area, I think the only way that happens is if he moves to safety or more zone coverage.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Jun 8, 2009 5:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your best point....
moving Champ to S, especially on passing downs, would make it more difficult for opposing teams to go away from him. I’m actually on the fence about the whole Champ to S debate. I think a better use would just be to use him to take away to other teams top receiver whoever that might be. I remember in 2005 when Coyer put Champ on Gonzo and basically just took away Green’s favorite target. I guess I would be in favor of more creative defensive scheming that uses his skills in the best way based on the team we are facing: S one week then back to CB the next week, constantly taking away the other teams top receiver.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Jun 8, 2009 6:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was initially against it for the same reasoning, but when you think about it
the Chiefs were really a unique case in that thei WR corps stunk to high heaven and I think you could of rolled out two CB’s off the street and matched up on the WR in 2005 effectively against the Chiefs. But putting him at safety doesn’t mean he can’t be assigned to cover the best WR an opposing team has, it just means that he does not declare before the snap that he will be matched man to man, he can play man to man or back off into a zone. Just my thoughts, like I said I have come around to the idea.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Jun 8, 2009 8:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
IIIIIII Like it !
"as in football so in life"
by asinsoin on Jun 8, 2009 4:23 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
maybe in a year or two
he was injured last year, and is still our best corner
by rayzin1973 on Jun 8, 2009 5:38 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
B man, I like your thinking
But, please please don’t use last year as an analysis point for our defense. Champ got beat up partially because he was trying to make up for our tackling deficiencies.
The teams that you cite didn’t make a post season run, and perhaps the other teams in the league were stronger at the front seven making up for their lack of strength at the DB positions.
I can see moving Champ in a year or two.
As I understand (and I may be wrong) the FS is the center fielder and the SS is the run stuffer. I’m sure they could switch, however.
With the 12th pick, the Broncos select Knowshon Moreno - Roger Goodell
That'll move the chains - Andy Samberg
by KaptainKirk on Jun 8, 2009 6:36 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Well I could use last years or the year before
Both were horrendouos, mainly because of the front seven, maybe that changes (hopefully that changes), but I think that after the 2005 run, teams realized that passing against the Broncos was relatively simple in that they would throw it away from Champ generally and they could dictate or force Champ to show who he was and how he was going to cover based on the pre-snap formation and defensive alignment, I realize we will have a different defense this year, but coverage can still generally be determined based on pre-snap reads if you have a good QB and OC. My main reasoning is that for Champ to get more oppurtunities at making plays or having balls thrown in his direction, I think a move to safety will allow for a greater freedom in Champ and his ability to read and react to a play and also allow the defense to disguise his coverage responsibilities a little better. Again, it will come down to the front seven putting pressure on the QB regardless of where Champ plays, I just think that having him at safety would hopefully result in more turnovers in that he is the best ball hawk in the secondary and I could see him becoming like an Ed Reed or Woodson type safety.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Jun 8, 2009 8:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I really like where you're coming from
I just didn’t think the examples were fair, that’s all.
With the 12th pick, the Broncos select Knowshon Moreno - Roger Goodell
That'll move the chains - Andy Samberg
by KaptainKirk on Jun 8, 2009 8:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was all for it...until FA and the draft.
I think Hill will be a huge upgrade over the last couple of years and, at the very least, solid. McBath needs reps and experience. Nolan loves his corners playing off man, which should play to Champ’s peek-and-pounce game perfectly.
As for Bailey’s potential at FS— I think he’d be as good a FS as CB. I think he’d shine in both phases.
I am an idiot walking a tightrope of fortune and fame
I am an acrobat swinging trapezes through circles of flame
If you've never stared off in the distance, then your life is a shame
and though I'll never forget your face,
sometimes i can't remember my name.
--Counting Crows, "Mrs. Potter's Lullaby"
by PredominantlyOrange on Jun 8, 2009 6:47 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
If a QB knows where he will be, chances are he won’t throw there, but if they can disguise his coverage from moving him to safety, his interception totals should increase and help the defense.
I was skeptical, at best, until I read the above statement. Then your position started to make some sense. I’m still skeptical, but your solid reasoning got me past the first hurdle…
Take my advice... I'm not using it!
by BroncTastic on Jun 8, 2009 7:20 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Not yet . . .
I’ve been telling fellow fans since we got him that Champ would eventually make a fine safety a la Rod Woodson, but he’s still playing great at corner, and you don’t move him until you have someone better to cover WRs.
by Halfdanish on Jun 8, 2009 11:15 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I guess my arguement would be was Rod moved to safety because they had a better corner
or was it because he could function better as a safety? I will admit I am not that knowlegable of when Rod was moved, but I don’t remember him losing his job at CB, more that they felt that he would have better impact at safety, I may be wrong on that.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Jun 9, 2009 2:11 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Had to vote no.
Bailey takes away one half of the field, and the opposing team’s best WR. He is also (by talent) a natural at CB, not at SAF.
Some lesser corners (you mentioned the Colts for example) play zone because that’s how you should use a lesser CB. Int those programs, the safeties play a different role. When you get a Ferrari, you don’t waste it in zone coverage, you use it in man. Champ is a true, man-coverage shut down corner, and his skills would be wasted in deep zone, which is a less skilled position. (I think I can say that, being that FS is my favorite position on the field, and Dawkins has always been my seceond favorite player next to Elway).
Dawkins and Hill are naturals at safety (and Dawkins is legendary). Bailey, Goodman, and Smith are naturals at CB. I wouldn’t mess up a goof thing. The last two years have been brutal on Champ and Bly, two quality pro bowlers because of the lack of a pass ruch up front and the odd use of one safety deep. I don’t think that should reflect on Bailey at all.
When Bailey does lose a step, I’ll still be opposed to Bailey moving to safety. I just don’t believe that Bailey’s man coverage skills convert to the same skill set as a safety. I doubt he will ever play safety.
A big part of my problem with Bailey moving to safety is the implied concept that the safety position is somehow just a lesser cornerback position. In my mind, the two positions are not very similar at all.
I’m giving this post a rec. I don’t have to agree with the premise to recognize when something is well written and sparks a good conversation.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 7:18 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
FWIW
McD seems to agree with you HT. In an interview yesterday he was talking about Champs ability to take away one side of the field. It’s an interesting read.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Jun 9, 2009 7:48 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on the quality of this post and the discussion
I don’t look at safety as a lesser cornerback position. It is different, but there is something to be said for a natural move from CB to SAF as a player gets older. This assumes Bailey wants to do it. If he does, then I think he will excel in it.
I disagree with the implication that Bailey wouldn’t be good at it. He reads plays better than any player on the defensive side of the ball. That skill set is key into what a FS would be doing. It would be an adjustment, but it is one that would be smooth for Bailey.
Even with my disagreements of HT, I still say this discussion is truly moot for probably 2 seasons anyhow…Bailey hasn’t lost a step yet and he is the friggin MAN at CB. I definitely agree with HT on that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Jun 9, 2009 8:09 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Bailey reads the offense differently than a safety.
A safety (particularly a free safety) reads the field strategicaly. He sees the overall play unfold, and the simultaneous movement of each of the potential runners / receivers. He sees a big picture.
Bailey reads the field tacticaly. He watches the QB’s eyes, throwing arm, and feet, while using his situational awareness and peripheal vision to position on the WR. He reads the QB and WR for his specific role.
I’m not saying he can’t read a play like a FS. But he hasn’t been doing it for years like many FSs have. I jus believe that it’s a different skill set.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 4:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am with you 100% on this
If anyone can translate, it is Champ, but we are talking some serious tradeoff here.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Jun 10, 2009 1:02 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
HT beat me to it....
:)
This was a real thought provoker of a post I must say.
What it boiled down to for me was the point you made about the opposition taking Champ out of the plays. That is exactly why he is needed in that position. It not only takes Champ out of the play, lessening risk of injury, but it also takes out the BEST receiver the opponent has. That’s a worthwhile tradeoff in my opinion.
A proud prognostication of 10-6 in 2009!!!
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
John Adams
by Broncotodd on Jun 9, 2009 8:55 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I have to disagree on this one. I probably would have agreed last season; however, I think we’re improved at safety and Champ will hopefully be healthy and back to his former self (not the Champ of the past two seasons) and will be best utilized as a CB.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Jun 9, 2009 2:35 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs




























