Educated Guess - 2009 Depth Chart Thoughts
It is still too early to have a good idea of what depth chart Denver will be using. But members of the media and fans at Milehighreport.com will put up depth charts anyway because it is fun to speculate on who will play at what positions. I love depth chart projections because the conversation that ensues serves to educate. Some folks will share information about a player trait that others weren't aware of, and discussions of schemes ensue.
Most longtime members of MHR love the annual depth-chart breakdown that Guru does. It was my favorite feature of MHR before I joined the site a few years ago. If you want accurate predictions, that's your story. If you want some educated guesses and a good discussion, I hope you'll enjoy the following....
As I've written consistently, this is a tough year to guess on our final roster and dept chart. New coaches, new system, a radical change in player-use philosophy, and a major turnover in players makes this year tricky, but very intriguing. We'll know much more when camp is fully underway, but here are some of my thoughts thus far.
DEFENSE
SAFETY
One of my most difficult tasks is to guess whether or not Brian Dawkins plays at his historical free-safety position or moves to strong safety. There are strong arguments both ways. Even at his age, Dawkins had a terrific season again last year. He still has speed and range, and can sack quarterbacks from the deep safety position. He still has the hands to intercept. And when he hits a ball carrier, the stadium hears it. Brian Dawkins remains a terrifying force on the field. I would like to see him stay at FS, but I'm starting to lean towards a move to SS. I have a few reasons for this, but I'm not 100% comfortable with making a firm projection.
First, Dawkins will be getting older, and the eventual slowing will make him a better fit at SS. Second, I'll take Dawkins covering a TE over some of the prospects at LOLB. Third, in most schemes the SS will have more run-support responsibilities, and Dawkins is one of those safeties that can consistently bring down even the biggest of RBs.
Renaldo Hill would then become my guess at FS. Coming off of the good year he had last year, I think he is a definite upgrade at FS. Given his age, he will likely be holding the position for a young up-and-coming player in the near future.
Darcel McBath is my favorite for the backup FS spot. He should do well on STs, but I think he will be the future at FS, and a player to watch. I think he'll see some playing time this year. For the fourth spot on the safety chart, we might see a duel between Vernon Fox and Josh Barrett. Fox could win out because there is talk about Barrett getting some looks for an OLB position.
Where does this leave the "other" rookie (David Bruton)? I think he has a shot at being a special teams ace for now, and a project for a future role at safety.
Cornerback
Superstar Champ Bailey is a lock for the #1 CB position. Andre Goodman was brought in to take over at the #2 position, and should do a great job there. Controversial draft pick Alphonso Smith will be exciting at nickel back, and is likely going to be a #2 CB in the near future.
I love what the team has done at safety and corner. We have two future-Hall of Famers at defensive-back positions, a hot rookie, and two solid veterans. The battle for the final spot will be between Jack Williams, Josh Bell, and Rashod Moulton.
Inside Linebacker
In my last article, I wrote that I was proud of myself for predicting that D.J. Williams would again be moving, this time to RILB. It is his natural spot, and one that he is happy with. He will be the anchor for the LBs. At LILB, Andra Davis will be stopping runs and "ted blocking" the way to sacks for the RILB. Beyond these two, nothing is sure.
I'm guessing that Larsen will be a FB / ILB hybrid. Someone pointed out a fact to me in the last couple of weeks, and I buy the reasoning - Larsen would make a great LILB because (as a FB) he is already capable of blocking the way through the trenches. I buy that, so Larsen becomes my pick for #2 LILB. Woodyard is my pick to back up Williams.
Outside Linebacker
With hybrids, this is a very tough call. Until he gets injured, Boss Bailey has a shot at starting LOLB, and Jarvis Moss is my guess to compete for the spot. The more I think about it, I like Elvis Dumervil at ROLB. He isn't big enough to play RDE in a 3-4, but his rush skills would make him a feared presence in a 3-4 played with a 5-2 look. I'm not sure who backs up Dumervil. With safety Josh Barrett getting looks at LB, I think he could go ROLB or LOLB. For now, let's consider ROLB a possibility.
Nose Tackle
The early favorite is clearly Ronald Fields, who was projected to start for the 49ers this year. Carlton Powell and Marcus Thomas are both bulking up and fighting for a spot, and I think there may be a better competition for the spot than earlier thought.
Defensive End
Let me throw out the names in the mix as I see them (in no special order) - Robert Ayers, Tim Crowder, Ryan McBean, Kenny Peterson, and Nic Clemons.
I think Ayers, McBean, and Crowder compete for the LDE spot. I think Peterson starts RDE, with Clemons or one of the three players competing for LDE backing him up.
OFFENSE
Quarterback
Kyle Orton had a lesser offensive line and lesser receivers in Chicago, but still managed more wins than Denver's previous QB. He may not have the physical tools and potential of a Jay Cutler, but he also lacks the drawbacks (forcing the ball into interceptions, not looking off receivers, decision making in general). Chris Simms is not likely to be the starter, but could be a surprise if called in during an injury to Orton.
Tom Brandstater may be a long-term project, or a desperate emergency player in the event of a catastrophic string of injuries. The only real question is, "Do we carry three QBs on the roster, or keep Brandenstater on the practice squad but suited up under the NFL's emergency 'third QB' rule"? Tom is a very smart kid, and may be a surprise in a couple of years.
Running Backs
Denver is loaded at this position. I was sorry to see Arrington not pass the physical, but Denver didn't lose much in the signing. Still, Denver finally has a workhorse RB in 1st-round draft pick Knowshon Moreno. The next question is, do we go committee or run a prime back? Do we spell or rotate? Peyton Hillis is a proven commodity as a power back, but can also block as FB or gash defensive lines running the ball from the FB position. Correll Buckhalter and LaMont Jordon are solid backs, not castoffs. The running game will not be an issue for Denver this year.
Larsen and Hillis can both play FB. Hillis is good enough to start at RB (with Moreno), and Larsen is good enough to play at LILB (likely rotating behind Davis).
Denver has a lot of options.
Receiver
Brandon Marshall starts at #1, and Eddie Royal starts at #2. Brandon Stokley is probably still going to be our slot receiver, and that's a good thing. This is a great starting group. Competing for the coveted 4th-receiver spot are Jabar Gaffney, rookie Kenny McKinley, and Chad Jackson.
Tight End
Daniel Graham is not only the clear starter, but has played in the NE offensive program before. He is an outstanding blocker, but can cause defenses problems if he goes out to catch. Tony Scheffler is too good of a receiving TE not to be in the mix, and will see the field in a lot of two-TE sets. Jeb Putzier and rookie Richard Quinn will fight for the 3rd TE position. Putzier has the advantage in catching, but Quinn is a heck of a blocker.
Center
Casey Wiegmann will start. Kory Lichtensteiger is being groomed as his replacement. Blake Schlueter (rookie) is either going to back up Kory next year, or might back up one of the guards this year.
Guard
Ben Hamilton starts at LG, and Chris Kuper starts at RG. Seth Olsen and (perhaps) Blake Schlueter are my guesses to back up.
Tackle
Ryan Clady is a lock at LT, and Ryan Harris is a lock at RT. Tyler Polumbus is a likely backup, but Brandon Gorin might give him a run for his money.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Special teams is settled at K, P, and long snapper. The only question is whether Royal will be relieved of his return responsibilities.
As mentioned earlier, without knowing the systems we'll be running, and with the added complexity of the Amoeba philosophy and the hybrid scheming, this is a tough depth chart to figure out. I'm certain that I'm going to be wrong on a least a few of my early guesses, but my overarching hope is that we as a group can discuss the roster and use the chart as a good base to exchange ideas.
I look forward to hearing from folks on their thoughts!
8 recs |
119 comments
|
Comments
Nice write up HT.
Jabar Gaffney getting the big nod in your poll. ;-)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Jun 9, 2009 11:38 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep
I voted for Gaffney, but I hope McKinley can step into that role next season.
by studbucket on Jun 9, 2009 11:51 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
McKinley vs. Gaffney
I voted Gaffney, but I have reasoning behind it. I think McKinley could use the year to develop (while making the squad, but not starting), and should get looks as the heir-apparent to Stokes. He fits the slot receiver mold pretty well, and even if he develops into a potential #1 or #2 guy, all that gives us is options. Gaffney gets the nod for ’09 because of experience.
by BroncosBassist on Jun 9, 2009 2:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really like Chad Jackson too...he is improving and Jedi likes something about him!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Jun 9, 2009 4:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
McD had some pretty glowing comments
about Gaffney’s smarts, work ethic, and versatility in his comments after yesterday’s passing camp. I think he’ll be hard to unseat at #4 in the coach’s mind.
"I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today" -- Wimpy J. Wellington
by Broncs Cheer on Jun 9, 2009 2:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, HT
Great stepping off point for discussion. Just read today the Torain ran windsprints with the team yesterday. Yet another RB in the mix.
This is what we wanted...
Hey, look what we got!
by pubkeeper on Jun 9, 2009 11:41 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Great and informative, HT
Just to clarify, are you suggesting that Marcus Thomas is going to be an NT or bust? I’d like to hear your insights on whether competing for starting NT would preclude him moving to DE if someone else is the starter.
by Chibronx on Jun 9, 2009 11:42 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Not at all.
I think any of our NTs could play DE. He could certainly play at DE. Good call Chibronx.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 2:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks HT!
It is fun to speculate, no? The biggest questions for me are around the front 7. I’m rather hopeful that we’ll feed a good group and love the competition we have there, but I am very unclear who will win out. I suspect Fields at NT and the two ILBs you identified above make a lot of sense, but outside of those I struggle. Like Chibronx above, I wonder what will happen to Thomas and Powell if Fields wins the starting NT job. And Ayers is a question, of course. Tough to figure out! : )
by NedBronco on Jun 9, 2009 11:57 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes; very tough.
I agree that NT and ILB are the easiest. Ayers is a very tough call. I tend to think of him as more a DE type, but he could play both. I agree with Chibronx; I think that any of the three players I listed for NT can play at DE.
Good stuff Ned!
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another good one HT
I wonder if Marcus Thomas would be better suited or more effective not playing the nose. He seems to have all the athletic ability in the world. I feel it would be wasted playing in the nose spot. Correct me if I’m wrong but, doesn’t the NT just plug the middle and take up 2 guys (ideally)?
All you get from drafting the "best player available" is a team full of good football players.
by orangeblood on Jun 9, 2009 12:19 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
You're pretty much right.
I wouldn’t say “just” plugs the middle, as it is a critical role in the 3-4, but yes, that about sums it up.
I want the best guy at NT that we can get. If it IS Marcus, than so be it. If not, I’d be very happy to see him in depth at NT, or in the rotation at DE.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
DE bugaboo...?
i hate to bring this up AGAIN, but DE still looks weak. i like ayers’ potential, but he seems small for a 3-4 end. (could be wrong on that—i’m just going on eyeballing). i like peterson too, but he’s not what i what i’d call “premier”, and other than that there’s not much exciting there. are we in big trouble here?
btw thanks HT! recd.
by oxmouth on Jun 9, 2009 12:23 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
We might be in trouble, but maybe not.
WIth a 5-2 type of 3-4 (the OLBs as pass rushing DEs, in a sense), I think we can do fine. So much comes down to how we do at NT. I agree we don’t look premier yet, but I think we look better than last year already.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
A thought
I’m wondering…
Do we need a “premier” player at DE? If Peterson is just solid, wouldn’t that work as well? I’m not sure how many teams employing the 3-4 front have 3 “premier” D-linemen. Look at SD, for example. I would venture a guess that only Castillo is “premier”. Williams has slowed, and Olshansky was average, at best. Or Pittsburgh, where everyone knows of Hampton, but are Keisel and…and…drawing a blank on the other DE…but I would say they were all just solid. If Ayers, who I think might surprise us as a 5-technique, and Peterson can be solid, along with Fields, then I think we could compare favorably with SD’s front 3, especially now that we have their coach. What do you think?
No inspirational quote here, just this...GO BRONCOS!!!
by Zogernaut on Jun 9, 2009 3:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the NT is key.
A rule of thumb for the 3-4 is that the 3-4 must be terrific. Even two terrific DEs without a teriffic NT does not make a good line.
So I’m really, really pulling for one of our NTs to come up big. If he’s fine, the other two don’t have to be “premier” (though that would be nice). I think we are passable at DE and OLB right now. It could go either way. I’ll be watching the NT battle closely.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
"premier"
i probably shouldn’t have used that term—I just meant to say that peterson’s not a player that most teams would be overly envious of (as a starter anyway). i think HT’s front line is a solid guess (maybe thomas at NT) and if it is… well, the front three don’t look like world beaters to me. as one of those “in the trench” believers, i need some comforting words… or to stock up on irish whiskey before the season…
by oxmouth on Jun 9, 2009 4:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're not far off
I think that Fields is the key to this. Here’s why: if Thomas and Petersen (or, even better, Powell, but that may take a few years if it even works) can develop in this formation we have some excellent options at LB. Fields taking that next step, with perhaps Baker to back him up, frees Thomas to start at DE and Powell to back up (or Davis, Pedescleaux, Parker)
We have so many options that it will be later traning camp before we have any thoughts as to who plays and who sits – and that could be a good thing
Hillis/Moreno in '09
by Emmett Smith on Jun 9, 2009 4:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
good call, bear.
now that you mention it, i was thinking of thomas at DE anyway. i think i like him there better than NT. so yeah, fields is a key and you’re right, there’s options. (i believe it’s what HT calls “a big part of the ameoba” down below. ….even if the biggest amoeba part is still pretty small. plus, i’ve always been a paramecium guy, myself).
in sum, i feel better about the D-line, but i still might get some irish whiskey.
by oxmouth on Jun 9, 2009 5:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
paramecium guy?
Don’t be cilia…
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Jun 10, 2009 12:08 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
That gets my rec'd comment of the day award.
(rolling eyes)
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 10, 2009 4:44 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
yep.
styg50: unofficial pioneer of the wildly popular single cell organism pun genre.
by oxmouth on Jun 10, 2009 9:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll be here all week
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Jun 10, 2009 10:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
+ 1
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on Jun 10, 2009 1:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we may have one
I am starting to believe that McBean could be a monster. Think about how stacked Pitt Dline and LBs are with depth. J. Harrison was cut from this team. McBean could be a guy like that ready to shine given the chance. I think pickups like him and Griesen are recognitions that some of these teams loaded with depth at certain positions can provide phenomenal value.
by BideshiBronco on Jun 9, 2009 10:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pitt DE's
Keisel is average, but Aaron Smith (former Univ. Nothern Colorado guy) is a stud.
Smith is very fast and fluid for a 290lb guy, and is one of the big keys to the success of Pitts Zone Blitz system because he is very effective hen dropping into a zone, while still able to hold the point on runs, etc.
If Ayers or Reid could develop into a similar player, that would be a GREAT piece in the defense.
I perosnally like the idea of Powell at NT… aren’t the scouting reports on him that he is stout against the run, but not a great slasher/pass rusher? If so, having him hold the point from NT sounds like more natural fit than a DE role?
by cjfarls on Jun 10, 2009 4:57 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree on Powell
Not only is he a runstopper, he handles double teams well. If he bulks up sufficiently he might turn into a real surpise at NT, might even be the starter by 2010.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Jun 10, 2009 5:10 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we're going to see a lot of rotation on the D-line,
so maybe the depth chart doesn’t matter quite as much there.
If this be Hell, let us make the most of it!
by Trinidad Jack on Jun 9, 2009 12:26 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
That’s a big part of the Ameoba. We’ll also have a lot of fresh players when the opposition makes long drives, which is another selling point.
I agree.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree also
From the post I did on Nunnely, I remember that one of the comments made from the SD website was that the MO for Nunnely was to constantly rotate in DL to have fresh and strong DL bodies in the 4th Qtr.
Another thought: Does playing an “Attacking” style of 3-4 or 5-2 change the need to have a Premier player or two on the line – especially NT. I other words if the NT is not Premier can Nolan/Nunnely game plan around that?
To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also DREAM; not only plan, but also BELIEVE.
by Broncobh on Jun 9, 2009 3:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The NT has to be very good.
Even if the DEs are great, an average NT wrecks the line. If yo go back and read a couple of the MHR-U articles I did on how the 3-4 linemen attack the gaps, you’ll see the requirement for the NT to draw the center and one of the guards for the rest of the line (and one LB) to be able to find an effective gap. This goes for both 1 and 2 gap schemes (though they are accomplished differently).
This doesn’t really change in a 5-2 look. The reason is because the OLBs are typicaly going wide (unlike in a true 5-2 with true DEs, who might drive inside). The blitzes from the ILBs allow the OLBs to play man or zone, and the NT still needs to draw the double.
So in a 4-3 or a true 5-2, you can get by with “just” good DTs. But in a 3-4 (even a 3-4 that gives a 5-2 look), you still really need excellence at NT.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why
I think we’ll be good at NT and DE.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Jun 9, 2009 4:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Nunnely's MO is that he rotates more than any other coach to keep his D Line fresh. We may take and extra D Lineman to the roster!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Jun 9, 2009 4:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted for Gaffney
I don’t know much about him other than he’s not a good Fantasy pick and has a funny name. He does have more seniority and experience with McD. I’m really waiting on Chad to step up his game and crack the rotation. My only concern with McKinley is his injury history. Thanks for the starting point for discussion HT.
Your choices look about right for this point in the year. I AM concerned about the recent speculation of Casey Weigman (sp?) wanting a new contract extension. Yes, he should get a pay raise after filling in admirably after Nalen retired. How many more years does he have after 14 seasons? It does not look like he would hold out, but I’m hoping that the issues get resolved. If not, the question becomes; is K Lich ready to start?
I really like the quality depth that is developing on our team as it bodes well for long term success.
With the 12th pick, the Broncos select Knowshon Moreno - Roger Goodell
That'll move the chains - Andy Samberg
by KaptainKirk on Jun 9, 2009 12:48 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
My Bad
Casey’s situation was being discussed on Horse Tracks and I came here previous to that conversation.
With the 12th pick, the Broncos select Knowshon Moreno - Roger Goodell
That'll move the chains - Andy Samberg
by KaptainKirk on Jun 9, 2009 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I haven't read the Wiegmann piece yet.
But he was brought in as a back-up, and is playing like a pro-bowler. I’d give him a raise and a couple more years; I think he’s earned it.
I also agree with most folks that Gaffney is the best of the three. I think we are bound to see McKinley this year, either to replace an injured player for a few plays or to come in for a play or two. I think he’ll do well getting a little experience with pro level practices before starting for us.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gaffney hands down...
He’s already proven himself a number of times on the field. I’ll take a proven talent over an unproven talent anyday (unless it’s a top flight sure thing pick). Also, when I say “proven” I mean it in the sense of the role Gaffney would play as a number four receiver. Come on, 438 yards a season and maybe two TDs here or there? That’s number four numbers. Besides, the more acclimated and experienced people the new QBs have to start out with, the better (I know they’re not “new” QBs in a rookie sense, but I’m sure you can get the point).
Nice post as always HT. Not only do you know how to inform readers in expert fashion, you can also stir up the debate and speculation.
by phantom818 on Jun 9, 2009 1:07 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Good points all.
I know what you mean about “new” QBs, and I agree.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice Projection!
Our offense is going to be deadly!!!!!!!
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win"-Brandon Marshall
Neckbeard vs The Spleen: How better can this get?!?!
by broncoboy on Jun 9, 2009 1:10 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
I only hope our defense can hold its own. If it can, we’ll have a decent season.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts, as well, HT
I think we will see much improvement if our D improves from “holding our collective noses” to “holding our own.” If we can just get an average D effort this year, I think the playoffs will be within sniffing distance. Not saying we will be a shoo-in, just saying they may be within reach.
Take my advice... I'm not using it!
by BroncTastic on Jun 9, 2009 5:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Center position
We have to wait and see, here, I am afraid. Casey has said that he wants a new deal. He could potentially retire. In the event that this does happen, we would have to go with Kory.
Bringing Bronco love from 1,114 miles away.
by broncointheville on Jun 9, 2009 1:23 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I want to see Wiegmann get a small extension and a raise.
Whether he stays or not, I think we can get it done with K-Lich. Wiegmann is a proven commodity, but I’m confident in Casey.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The talent on offense is Top 5 in the NFL.
Good read:
I would have liked to see the author make a few guesses as to some of the final cut downs. Is Crowder or Moss or Jack Williams or Barrett likely to be cut? Any surprise vet cuts?
Would we carry six WRs or six RB/FBs
How many D-linemen does he think we’ll have on the roster?
How many LBs?
Any rookie FAs making the team?
Side note: Denver is loaded at WR, TE, has a top pass blocking O-line, Hillis and a blue chip RB. We even have depth at all the skill positions on offense. Even if Orton is just decent, this offense better be a Top 10 unit throughout the season.
by McGeorge on Jun 9, 2009 1:24 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. Let's do some guesses.
I am biased toward Jack Williams making this team. As much as he reminds me of DWill, I just am really rooting for him in my heart of hearts. I really think he will make this team, too. I just think Bell has too much work to do and don’t know enough about Moulton to make an informed case for him.
I think Moss makes it and Crowder doesn’t. Crowder hasn’t really shown us much at all since he was drafted but Moss has at least shown some glimmers (or “a gleam” if you are Marty Schottenheimer)
I don’t think we carry six wr or rb/fb. That is way too many. I can see five WR and four RB. I don’t see us needing more than that. With the amoeba offense we will be running with hillis splitting out wide and moreno catching passes, I don’t think we will need more than that. We should be fine there.
LB will be near impossible to forsee. There is so much new information for them to digest and so many new players to the team. It’s gonna be a dogfight all the way to the end to see who stays and who goes. I do think that DJ will start. Quite a prediction, huh????
I see a few FAs making the team at NT. We need all the DLine help we can get.
Prediction: The broncos will take a MAJOR look at Greg Ellis. None of the MSM said the Broncos were talking about Ellis, but the Broncos would be amiss if they didn’t at least contemplate this guy on our defense. Talk about a playmaker.
What do you all think????
Bringing Bronco love from 1,114 miles away.
by broncointheville on Jun 9, 2009 1:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does anyone think Clemmons may be a casualty?
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I picked him as my dark horse.
I have absolutely no reasoning behind it; I just think he will surprise people.
No stairway? ...denied!
by papigrande on Jun 9, 2009 5:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
re: Clemons
It’s a surprisingly crowded field, but Clemons has an advantage in that he has a 3-4 somatotype. We have a number of 3-4 body types, however, and it’s a curious fact. In fact, it’s one of the things that’s missed by pundits who were critical of Denver’s draft strategy.
The upside is that ‘coaching them up’ could substantially improve our defense, especially if we can avoid the breakdowns elsewhere on defense.
My feeling on the subject of the DL — I’m getting a ‘buzz’ on Rulon Davis. His effort may appeal to the staff. My logic tells me that versatility and willingness to sacrifice oneself are key for DL34s. I can’t see more than six full time DLs, and a player such Crowder stands to benefit from being ‘coached up,’ too. I’d turn the “less invested” logic on it’s head and say that the new staff may be able to bring more out of Moss & Crowder than the old one could.
Some guesses:
NT – Fields*, Thomas*, Baker (*can play DE)
DE – Peterson#, Powell#, Crowder (#can play NT)
Notice that Ayers and Reid are part time DEs, which adds to the depth.
It’s very tentative at this early point but it would seem, based on this, that Clemons and Jones are on the bubble.
"If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas
by Colinski on Jun 10, 2009 12:06 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crowder
I think you forgot about what Crowder did in 2007. He ran back a fumble for a TD, made a few plays in the backfield, and I believe had 2.5 sacks. Lets try and forget what happened last year with these young guys, and think about the new coaching they will have this year. I got a feeling Crowder might be a pleasant surprise this year at LDE. He has the size, and with the new coaching staff teaching better techniques, he could be a disruptive force on passing downs, as well as a clogger on first down run plays. Moss is better suited standing up, and could be a Boss Bailey clone, hopefully without all the injuries.
Have faith, at least until we see what happens in August.
No inspirational quote here, just this...GO BRONCOS!!!
by Zogernaut on Jun 9, 2009 3:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Crowder would be good in rotation...
…but he faces a lot of tough competition to be a true starter.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great point...you cant give up on a 2nd round pick after 2 years, when his first season was VERY good!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Jun 9, 2009 4:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
four RB/FB
Moreno
Hillis
who do you cut?
Buckhalter, bad knees has had success as backup 3rd down back
Jordan, knows the coach/system decent talent…probably an underacheiver (though it was the raiders)
Torain – has potential, injuries problems and no experience
Larsen – versatile; great ST and Def talent as well
by trumanj on Jun 9, 2009 4:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Easy
Larsen doesn’t belong in this group…he isn’t solely a RB and can fill roles elsewhere (and probably will).
Torain goes unless he shows in camp he is better than Moreno. (Sorry kid, but that’s what it is…upside needs to be superb to stick around in this group)
There you have it. I LOVE the four we have left there.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Jun 9, 2009 5:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Larsen stays but as a linebacker and special teams player
Jordan stays because he is good in the system
Torain stays
Buckhalter doesn’t really have a place in this offense. We already have a 3rd down back in hillis and jordan. His strengths are found in other players. I see him getting cut.
Bringing Bronco love from 1,114 miles away.
by broncointheville on Jun 9, 2009 6:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ick
No way does Buckhalter go and Torain stay. The kid looked good in one half of one game last year. Buckhalter has much more game and much more evidence backing up his capabilities.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Jun 10, 2009 8:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
you may be right
but Torain was drafted last year and i have to believe the leftover coaching staff still sees promise in him.
by trumanj on Jun 10, 2009 11:50 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The author...
…isn’t as good at some of those questions as you might be. I left it pretty open ended because I want to fire up the discussion. I feel it is hard enough to pick the starters in a new system (which we don’t yet know), a new philosophy (the Ameoba) and a new formation (on defense).
As to how many of each position we carry, I’d love to hear your thoughts and everyone else’s.
: )
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I bet we keep 4 tight ends
With McD planning on 3 TE formations, you’ve got to have a spare. If that means just 5 wide receivers, so be it, with either McKinley or Jackson hopefully making it past waivers to the PS.
Growing older is not for sissies. Jack Palance
by bradley on Jun 9, 2009 1:48 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
We just might.
If we only keep three, I agree with another commentor that it is hard to believe that we would give up a high pick like Quinn. That would make Putzier the casualty.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
An Ironic Twist of Fate
I though it was really ironic that last week on Broncos TV – the two interviews were Putzier and Vernon Fox – Two potential roster cuts in my opinion.. Time will tell,.
To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also DREAM; not only plan, but also BELIEVE.
by Broncobh on Jun 9, 2009 3:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want us to keep jackson....he has MAD potential
I think we may keep 6 WR’s with how lethal and option ridden our O will be…especially with multi talented players we have on D.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Jun 9, 2009 4:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only thing with Jackson
I agree, boydy – MAD potential. But it’s his fourth season and it’s a business. I think that it’s his ‘put up or walk’ training camp
Hillis/Moreno in '09
by Emmett Smith on Jun 9, 2009 4:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
he was released once already from a McDaniel's led offense
I think he has the steepest uphill battle of any WR, including the rookie. Despite his speed in practice, let us remember that it was inability to recover fully froma knee injury that even made it possible for him to come to Denver.
Guru, firstfan, et al, please keep an eye on the speedy guy once the pads go on….
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Jun 10, 2009 12:16 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't see us keeping 4 TEs
I think Putzier’s gone.
But who will guard the guards themselves?
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Jun 9, 2009 5:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that if...
…we only keep three, Putzier is the casualty. Quinn is a keeper.
Growing older is not for sissies. Jack Palance
by bradley on Jun 9, 2009 5:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
roster math
Yes, and it’s partlly because we’ll have one less position because we’ll carry three QBs. The days of four TEs seem to be over. Shanahan seemed to be infatuated with the possibilities inherent in keeping a player such as Nate Jackson, who created severe matchup problems, but it’s too much of a luxury to carry two pass-catching TEs now.
"If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas
by Colinski on Jun 10, 2009 12:46 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I couldn't vote
I thinkwe will likely sign another WR after the final cuts or someone else will emerge, just a hunch. As for Ayers, I see him being a rush LB primarily and maybe getting moved around the defense like Mecklenberg did early in his career. I could see him playing NT on passing downs where they try to exploit him one on one against a center like the Cardinals did with Dockett in the Super Bowl. Unless Schef gets injured, I don’t see Putzier making this team, I can’t see them cutting or putting a second round draft choice on the PS, and I don’t see them keeping more than three TE on the active roster. I m not sure Olsen will make the active roster, I could see him being on the PS for a year.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Jun 9, 2009 2:05 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
One strange thought that I have...
Is that our last pick (Schlueter) may turn out to be a bigger role player than Olsen. Nothing solid, just a hunch.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seems like Schlueter fits the mold better than Olsen, I would agree with that.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Jun 9, 2009 5:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
HoosierTeacher, like you said ‘let the debate start’
I really think the O is set so my energy is spent on D.
My first issue is that you did not include ANY CFA’s. They are not that good in your opinion? Maybe since you left out many players, you excluded the practice squad on purpose.
IMO they keep 6 DL and Coach Nunnely rotates them all; McBean, Fields, Peterson, Powell, Thomas, and Baker/Pedescleaux loser to the PS.
IMO they keep 8 LB’ers; Dumervil, DJWilliams, ADavis, Ayers, Larsen, Woodyard, Reid, Moss/RDavis. Lee Robinson to PS. Boss to IR or cut.
IMO they keep 5 CB and safeties; Bailey, Goodman, Phonze, JWilliams and Bell. Carter and Johnson to PS. Dawkins, Hill, Barrett, McBath, Bruton.
Greg Ellis is a ‘rush’ OLB. Denver already has two VERY promising players at that position, Doom and Ayers.
by DLMyers on Jun 9, 2009 2:51 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
CFAs, etc
I left out the CFAs because I’m playing the odds. I’m sure we’ll get a surprise or two, but keep in mind that I’m making these predictions even before camp is underway. I didn’t include the practice squad on purpose.
Good picks you have there, and hard to argue with.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Robert Ayers ...
Why do people actually think Robert Ayers is going to be a DE on anything other than an obvious passing situation? Every camp report I have read suggests he will almost all his snaps as a 3-4 OLB or a 4-3 DE when we are in a Nickel/Dime. He also isn’t anywhere near big enough to play 3-4 DE on possible running downs. Until I hear otherwise, I believe Robert Ayers will battle for a spot at OLB for us rather than DE.
by lomaxgr on Jun 9, 2009 3:18 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
My thinking
First, Ayers isn’t known for his pass rush skills. He can tackle, and he can hold the point of attack. But his speed to the QB hasn’t been a strong point. For that reason, I see him as more of a run stopping DE or OLB. Since reports have us being a penetrating defense, I’m guessing he would do well as a DE, since he could tie up an OLman or two and allow the OLB a clean shot.
I don’t see him as fast enough to cover the edge weakside OLB, and he doesn’t have the coverage skills of a LOLB. That’s just my thinking, and there are good arguments both ways.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I should add that I see him playing as a 1 gap DE.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Ayers will end up at OLB
Today, the DP reported the following:
Ayers was working with the first-team nickel defense at outside linebacker Monday.
I continue to see evidence that he’ll play OLB.
And, HT, I’ve never heard anyone share your opinion about Ayers’ lack of pass rushing ability. I always heard people liked his scheme/position diversity and that he really could get after the quarterback. What makes you think he can’t rush the quarterback?
But who will guard the guards themselves?
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Jun 9, 2009 5:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
IT isn't that he can't rush
it is that he is not a classic speed rusher. He is a true “technician” at the position, and works best when he is plugged into a scheme and a team.
He isn’t a solo star type guy, but that doesn’t mean he won’t leave his mark as a playmaker.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Jun 10, 2009 12:20 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unless I'm mistaken....
A lot of folks were critical of the fact that he doesn’t seem to get many sacks, and used this to bash the Broncos for taking him. My answer was that I don’t see him as a rushing DE (or OLB) at any rate.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 10, 2009 4:53 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with styg about him being a technician
and think he can develop into an effective rusher from the LDE position, in which speed isn’t as much a priority as at OLB.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Jun 10, 2009 5:15 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hes a 5 technique isn't he with pass rushing talent...
I think he will play a Elephant type, Adallius Thomas type role, as will Darrell Reid. We have MONSTER options on D now!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Jun 9, 2009 4:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe I am thinking of Rulon Davis...
In fact, I am.
Davis was the only TRUE 5 technique in the draft and he will be my surprise pick to make the squad.
I read that Ayers has the ability to bulk up to around 290 to play end in certain situations.
Sorry about the confusion…too much going on right now!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
by boydy2669 on Jun 9, 2009 4:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great as always HT!
This got me very excited for AUG. It’s gaffney at the number 4. Coach loves him and he already understands the system.
by ThorpeBroncosfan on Jun 9, 2009 3:28 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
I probably should have come up with a trickier poll question!
: )
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks HT.
Nice post. I agree with some of your points and disagree with others. Where did you hear that Barrett is being looked at as a possible LB? I think he is still a prototypical safety that every team looks for but needs some coaching to reach his potential. My predictions are for the Base 3-4 and does not reflect where players will line up in the dime and nickel.
I agree with everything at safety and corner. Love what the coaching staff has done there. I believe A Smith could beat out Goodman in trainging camp for the #2 spot.
I agree that our DJ will play RILB and A Davis will play LILB but I could really see Larsen beating our Davis for the starting spot at LILB. Lasen showed last year that he has great insticts, he is younger and faster then Davis. If Larsen does not beat him out by week one then it will have during the season.
The OLB spot is a big question right now. I think DOOM starts as the rush ROLB. He will be a terror of the edge, there a very few LT and no TE that can cover him 1 on 1. DOOM also gets to practice against the bets LT in the league in Clady everyday which will make him better. I think the other OLB spot is one of the biggest questions right now. You have Ayers, Moss, D Reid, Greisen, possibly crowder(I dont see Crowder at LB more of a DE but who knows), The suprise could be Lee Robinson. I am probably forgetting someone but this position will not be locked down until training camp.
The D line is the biggest question mark right now and is the hardest to judge with no pads on. One thing I do know is Coach Nunnely rotates his linemen more then most coaches in the league so that his starters are fresh for the 4th Q. I think Fields is the favorite the start at NT right now because he knows Nolans system. I think Powell, Marcus Thomas and the rookie Baker will all compete to be in the rotation for NT. These guys will also compete for the DE spots. I would love to see a Dline with each guy above 310, think about that for a second. No more 280 pound DT, what a great thought. At DE we could see Petereson, Powell, Thomas, Baker, R Davis, E Pedescleaux, Askew, J Parker and possibly Ayers. You can not predict this position until training camp. The coaches have to see what the big guys can do in pads first.
The offense will almost have the same depth chart from last year. The Oline will be the same, unless management does not give Casey his contract and he retires. I think KO will start at QB. Moreno and Hills will be the 1-2 punch at RB. You can call Marshall, Royal and Stoke the 1-2-3 WR but wideouts move around some much in this offense that being called the #1 widereciever doesn’t really matter. TE will be the same, Graham will start, Tony will be used the same as a pass catching TE and the Rookie Quinn will most likey be used in heavy TE sets.
by gnarlybroncodude on Jun 9, 2009 3:32 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Lots of good stuff in there!
I remember reading about Barrett lining up at LB in mini-camp, and the talk was tht he was pretty good. I agree with you that I prefer him at SAF. But with the current crop at SAF, it will be hard for him to get some playing time in.
Larsen is faster thatn Davis. On the other hand, speed isn’t as much of an issue at LILB. Davis has a lot of experience, and is a sire tackler. On the other hand, you have a great point about Larsen. He could vey well use his FB skills as a lead Ted block for Williams, and that could get him past Davis. Perhaps they’ll rotate.
I messed up by leaving out Reid. I think he will make the team as a DE. I don’t know where he’ll be on the chart in terms of depth, but I wouldn’t count him out as a starter. Thanks for bringing his name up.
Thanks for the thoughts!
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 9, 2009 3:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Barrett talks about playing a Monster role
HERE.
He says he lines up where the Mike and Jack might be, too. I’ll let the ‘X and 0s’ people decipher what he means, but it appears to be an assignment and not a position change. And this doesn’t preclude him from actually making a position switch, which may have occurred in an earlier camp. My advice is to not get too worried about players trying different positions. Unlike in the past, where it may have been a precursor to a permanent change, now it probably means they’ll see the field in a wider variety of roles — it’s a good thing!
"If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas
by Colinski on Jun 10, 2009 1:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
plus I feel better
about the coaches whose eyes are dictating the packages and changes. I cringed last year every time I saw something new….
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Jun 10, 2009 10:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Barrett at Monster
the Monster role usually refers to a run stopping safety who is brought up to the line to create a hybrid LB/S position. He makes a 5-2 look like a 5-3 or a 4-3 look like a 4-4. It’s usually only used at the HS and small college level anymore. But they seem to be exploring a lot of unconventional ideas.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Jun 10, 2009 12:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Goal line usefulness?
Would it make sense to bring in a Monster in goal line or red zone situations, providing someone who can cover the pass effectively, but is also better able to step up and stop a run?
"Don't feed the trolls. Remember to be polite. And please show self-restraint in comment length!" -Me, to myself, because I need constant reminding.
by Disco_Stu on Jun 10, 2009 12:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not so much.
The goal line defensive formation is too ideal to go with another formation. At any rate, the safeties play pretty close to the goal line anyway and (in the case of a goal line formation) wouldn’t then be called “monster”.
SWG is also right about the “monster” being pretty much used in HS and small colleges. FWIW, a “monster” scheme is to have a safety blitz.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 10, 2009 4:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
could it be possible that they are just expanding his toolbox?
He is a heavy hitter, so maybe they want to get him more familiar with blitz packages to help create turnovers and pressure?
In this case they don’t necessarily install the monster role, but just some terminology and tape for breaking down and teachinga specific skillset: the SS blitz.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Jun 10, 2009 5:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he is just going to be used all over, as he (Barrett) says in Colinski's comment.
And thanks to Colinski for clearing up who used the term. The fact that a reporter used it and not Barrett makes it much clearer.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 11, 2009 12:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Monster is the reporter's term
A question was asked by a reporter about his playing in a “monster back type,”[role] at the 4:00 minute mark.
http://www.denverbroncos.com/page.php?id=349&videoID=3295&type=broncosTV&year=&month=
Barrett says, “it’s almost like a hybrid.. because at times I’ll line up line up like our Mike backer will line up or as our Jack backer would line up..” Barrett goes on to talk about the flexibility of how he’ll be used.
"If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas
by Colinski on Jun 10, 2009 10:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice article Professor
Some interesting cuts are going to be needed at the WR position. Look for a shake up, I wouldn’t be suprised if we see a lot of -
Marshall and Gafney with Royal in the slot…
I love Stokely, love what he brings, his 3rd down awareness, etc…but it’s a numbers game and he is probably not in the long term plans due to his age and concussion history so…I’m not making a bold prediction but wouldn’t be suprised is Stokely is a surpise cut.
Moreno in 2009! - Check
Taylor Mays in 2010!
by Steve O' on Jun 9, 2009 4:15 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm pulling for Stokley
Stokley is one of the best to ever play the slot position. His concussion history is the result of taking hits over the middle of the field to catch passes that some other receivers wouldn’t dare sacrifice for. His biggest advantage (in a new system under McDaniels) is that he is a veteran of route running. I think he’s just too good to let go. Still, I could see Gaffney bumping him; it would just be a shame (in my mind).
We are really over loaded at receiver. Marshall is our clear #1, and Royal our #2. Gaffney could play at 2 or 3, Stokley is built to play 3, and McKinley is (in my opinion) a slot receiver who is built to stretch the field verticaly and NOT take passes over the middle. In short, they’re all in the mix. Whoever doesn’t get the slot will compete for #4, and we can carry a fifth anyway. I really don’t see Jackson making the team.
First, we can run a deadly 5 WR set if the situation calls for it. Second, we’ll have skilled reserve players if we get an injury. While I don’t think we’ll be losing Marshall anytime soon, Gaffney provides some insurance. With Royal increasing his experience (and burning the opposition when he played at #1 the first weeks that Marshall was suspended), I wouldn’t panic if Royal played at #1 should Marshall leave. Recall too that Stokley filled in at #1 a few times and held his own.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 10, 2009 5:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I don’t see Stoke going anywhere. He is too good and still loves the game. No way can you get rid of him. If he leaves it will be because of another concussion, not because of getting cut.
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Jun 10, 2009 8:34 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd like to give my predictions
QB – Orton, Simms. I think TB might have to cool it on the PS
RB – Moreno, Buckhalter/Jordan, Torain. By the end of training camp, either Buck or Jordan will be cut.
FB – Hillis, possibly Jordan. We might even stash Quinn as a FB/TE, like KC used to have.
WR – Marshall, Royal, Stokley, Gaffney, Jackson, and McKinley. There’s enough room, and if not, McKinley goes to PS.
TE – Graham, Scheffler, and Quinn. Putzier gets the axe at the first roster cuts.
OT – Clady, Harris, and Polumbus. Gorin is also a “maybe”
OG – Hamilton, Kuper, Olsen, and Erickson. Might have KLich as a BU
C – Weigmann, and KLich. I think Schleuter goes to PS
DE – Ayers, Thomas, Peterson, Crowder/McBean, Pedescleaux, and Powell. Thats a man-sized rotation! Rulon Davis to PS
NT – Fields, Baker, and Parker. Thomas and Powell slide in on passing downs
OLB – Dumervil, Bailey/Moss, Reid, Barrett, and Crowder. I still have faith in Crowder
ILB – DJ, A. Davis, WW, Larsen, and Robinson. Haggan might make it as well
No inspirational quote here, just this...GO BRONCOS!!!
by Zogernaut on Jun 9, 2009 4:17 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Continued
CB – Champ, Goodman, Smith, JMFW, and Bell. We should have one of the top CB corp in the league
S – Dawkins, Hill, McBath, Fox, and Bruton. Barrett makes the switch to OLB smoothly, and also fills in at S if injuries occur
I’m not sure about the final tally here, but I would be extremely happy with any number of these guys making the team. With the improved coaching staff, and the leadership infusion, we should definitely compete for the AFC West crown in 09.
GO BRONCOS!!!
No inspirational quote here, just this...GO BRONCOS!!!
by Zogernaut on Jun 9, 2009 4:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL! Actually orton throws more ints per attempt. Inaccurate, bad arm or just bad decisions?
When I look at our defensive talent… I sure hope Nolan gets them playing well together, they’re not going to scare anybody individually.
Our OLBs scare me. They could be really good or really bad! Anybody got a feel for how they’ve looked in camp? Boss’s health?
I’d like to see how we’re using Champ this year. Hopefully he used as the shut down corner he is, not the half cover, half cheat run stopper he’s been the last few years! I don’t care how well he sniffs out and stops the run (really well!), he’s been burnt far too many times in that mode.
Wow, gotta be excited about our offense! If we can get smart production out of the QB position and our line learns to run block? …An average defense has us competing for the division.
Oh yeah, special teams were horrible last year, it could be argued that they cost us two games. I like our new coach there but the kicker… he better be working hard this off season!
by Whidbey Bronco on Jun 9, 2009 8:18 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Oddly enough
Sounds like Prater is working a bit LESS right now! But from the sounds of it, that’s the plan. Between kicker competitions and the pressure, he was over-kicking and suffering from fatigue as the season wore on. I think he’s going from kicking more to kicking smarter.
As for Boss, I got his autograph at Fan Fair…but he had to leave with a sprained wrist half way through…
"Don't feed the trolls. Remember to be polite. And please show self-restraint in comment length!" -Me, to myself, because I need constant reminding.
by Disco_Stu on Jun 9, 2009 8:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
classic!!!!
" to Disco Stu from Boss Ba"
Love it.
And yeah, Prater mentioned that he would kick the snot out of the ball during his “funk”, logging an extra 60 kicks in practice per day.
By the end of the season it was probably a lot like having a rubberband swinging from your hip instead of a leg….
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Jun 10, 2009 12:26 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very nicely done.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 10, 2009 4:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Orton vs. Cutler
Career Numbers:
Cutler – INT every 32.97 Attempts (1220/37)
Orton – INT every 33.81 Attempts (913/27)
2008 Season
Cutler – INT every 34.22 Attempts (616/18)
Orton – INT every 38.75 Attempts (465/12)
Put into INTs per attempt:
Career:
Cutler – 0.0303 INTs per attempt
Orton – 0.0295 INTs per attempt
2008
Cutler – 0.0292 INTs per attempt
Orton – 0.0258 INTs per attempt
Not sure where you got your numbers from, unless it was a comparison to Simms…
"Don't feed the trolls. Remember to be polite. And please show self-restraint in comment length!" -Me, to myself, because I need constant reminding.
by Disco_Stu on Jun 9, 2009 8:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
oops my bad, I didn't actually do the math
really similar actually. I won’t go on like I want to. Let’s just say if Orton’s numbers are anything like JC’s, he should do well in McD’s system…
Boss’s wrist… gosh
Prater? fatigue as the season wore on? He’s a freaking kicker already! Yikes.
by Whidbey Bronco on Jun 9, 2009 10:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Job Disco-Stu
Another point is that he was putting up less INTs per attempt with a lesser OL and lesser WRs. He should do very well in Denver. The inverse is true too – Cutler should help in Chicago.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 10, 2009 5:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doing the numbers kind of helps when you quote numbers
It’s also worth noting that for 08, we have:
Cutler :INT% – 2.92, Sack% 1.75
Orton: INT% 2.58, Sack% 5.79
With a lousy O line a poor overall receivers Orton still had less INTs by percentage. With a very good O line and excellent receivers, Cutler throws more. Then there are red zone and 2 minute drill numbers and Cutler looks even worse. He’s got a lot of natural talent, but he needs to learn to become an NFL quarterback. Orton has had a bad rap.
As far as kickers go – very few ever move from college to the pros without having problems with fatigue and injury later in their first year. Read Fatsis’ book on kicking and you’ll find that what most folks believe is simply wrong. The repetitive nature of the kicker’s job is hell on the human body. What am I, some kind of doctor? Yes
Hillis/Moreno in '09
by Emmett Smith on Jun 9, 2009 10:31 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Now I get down to your comment....
…and see you beat me to it (and did a better job than I did).
: )
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 10, 2009 5:36 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Classic!
“Doing the numbers kind of helps when you quote numbers”
by AllBroncsallday on Jun 10, 2009 10:12 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't mean it to sound rude
Just pulling someone’s leg – sometimes the claws tend to scratch…..
Hillis/Moreno in '09
by Emmett Smith on Jun 10, 2009 11:25 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
All I know
Is that it made me laugh!
by AllBroncsallday on Jun 10, 2009 2:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice job HT
Figuring out who will be where on the depth chart will quite interesting and entertaining as well. I think the fact that we have a new HC and DC who will implement a whole new system along with going to a 3-4, will definatly help the players for the better. Competition always brings out the best in everyone. Not a lot of players are locks for their postition so this will show us what we have and how bad they want it.
GO BRONCOS IN 2009 AND BEYOND!!
Lakers lead NBA Finals 2-1
by weazel on Jun 10, 2009 1:41 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Random thoughts
Nice topic. I have no idea what’ll happen on the d-line. Too many bodies about whom I know nothing. But I’m not going to let that stop me. I see Fields at NT with Powell backing him up, Thomas and Peterson at RDE, Powell and Ayers at LDE. Clemons is gone, Crowder and McBean are on the bubble, but I think Crowder beats him out for second or third string LDE.
I see DJ at RILB and WW at LILB, with Andra Davis and Larsen the backups. At LOLB Reid and Ayers, with Boss on the bubble, at ROLB Dumervil and Moss, maybe also Barrett. I think lots of players on the front 7 will see the field as part of a regular rotation and/or in various situational packages. I think the coaches will try to keep Bailey, Dawkins, DJ and WW on the field as much as possible, especially in critical situations, as they’re all playmakers. Ayers will probably gain that status as he gains experience. With the emergence of WW, the acquisition of Dawkins and the drafting of Ayers the defense suddenly has a lot of big play guys, and with Nolan’s coaching this unit might turn out to be opportunistic and surprisingly effective.
The secondary is more settled, with Dawkins and Hill the starters at FS and SS and McBath and Barrett, respectively, as the backups. I think Fox is gone and that Bruton will likely end up on the practice squad. At CB Champ and Goodman, with Smith as the nickle back and Bell as the dime.
At RB pencil in Moreno, Hillis, Buckhalter, Torain, Larsen and maybe Jordan, depending on whether we go with five or six backs. Larsen is the starting FB with Hillis the backup, Moreno is the starting RB. As with the d-line I think the terms starter and backup are nominal, as all will see significant playing time. I think Moreno and Hillis might often be on the field together on third downs, and I think we’ll see a lot of Hillis in the fourth quarter when we’re protecting leads. We might see more of Moreno if we’re trying to come from behind. I think Buckhalter and Torain will get snaps but will mainly provide depth, giving guys who get dinged up a chance to heal without the offense missing a beat. Jordan might beat out Torain if McDaniels wants a backup power back in addition to having Buckhalter as the backup speed back.
I expect Orton to be the QB after a surprisingly stern challenge from Simms. The o-line and receiver corps are pretty unproblematic, so I don’t have anything to add except that, like most, I expect Gaffney to be number 4.
"In the empty spaces - lacunae, vacuums, pauses, voids, black holes - new things begin. We are born anew from the unexplored space, the badlands, the outlaw territory." - Sam Keen
by spock on Jun 10, 2009 5:06 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Great stuff Spock.
I can’t wait to see how this all plays out. I’m pretty sure there will be a lot of surprises for all of of us.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 10, 2009 6:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Until he gets injured, Boss Bailey has a shot...
I just shot coffee through my nose…LOL
So sad but true. :(
A proud prognostication of 10-6 in 2009!!!
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
John Adams
by Broncotodd on Jun 10, 2009 9:32 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Hope the coffee didn't hit the keyboard!
I didn’t mean for the comment to be funny, but yeah, I guess it is.
: )
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 10, 2009 4:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really am intrigued by the NT position
I just wish I could watch all team activities and see these guys fight for the job.
It really seems to be the key to being more than just an average defensive team.
Thanks for the post, and as always, I have expanded my X’s and O’s awareness from one of your articles!
A proud prognostication of 10-6 in 2009!!!
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
John Adams
by Broncotodd on Jun 10, 2009 9:35 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I wish I could be paid to watch all the practices.
If it wasn’t for the need to have my current job, I would LOVE to watch the Broncos constantly to try and figure out what was going on. This year is the hardest year I can remember in trying to figure out who will be where.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Jun 10, 2009 4:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





























