Mile High Report: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Broncos Dreams and Musings July 3, 2009

Denver Broncos linebacker Darrell Reid, left, talks with head coach Josh McDaniels before drills during the team's football minicamp at the Broncos headquarters in Englewood, Colo., on Sunday, June 14, 2009. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

More photos » by David Zalubowski - AP

5 months ago: Denver Broncos linebacker Darrell Reid, left, talks with head coach Josh McDaniels before drills during the team's football minicamp at the Broncos headquarters in Englewood, Colo., on Sunday, June 14, 2009. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

The Denver Broncos and Michael Lombardi

I was meandering through some old materials this weekend when I found a pre-draft set of concerns about the Broncos by Michael Lombardi. I had thought at the time that they were reasonable and a fair consideration, so I kept them around. Here is what he said:


DENVER       

  1. Who is going to be the Broncos starting quarterback? Can they repair, restore and revive the relationship between Jay Cutler and the head coach?
  2. With the switch to a 3-4 there are plenty of positions up for grabs, but the essential question is this: Who will rush the passer from the outside? 
  3. Denver forced only 13 turnovers last season and clearly lack speed on every level of their defense.  Who is going to be their playmaker?
  4. The Broncos struggled to cover anyone, even with Champ Bailey, and finished with just six interceptions for the season.  Who can cover?
  5. Can they expect to get another year out of Casey Wiegmann at center? They struggled when they played physical defensive teams

I thought, even then, that these were excellent questions. There was not doubt that pre-draft, the Broncos had reason to give pause to even the most voracious fans. This led to a lot of musing on what happened and dreams of what might be. That being said, let's take them one at a time and see if Denver did anything to work out those concerns.

Star-divide

Question 1: Who will be the Quarterback?

The Broncos made a decision to give up on the more emotionally fraught and fragile situation with Jay Cutler, cut their losses and make a deal that would yield a starter in Orton and kept their backup in Simms. That same deal also netted them (in essence) Knowshon Moreno and Alphonso Smith and 'half' of Richard Quinn, with a caveat involving the trade of a 3rd-round pick for a 5th-rounder (There are different ways to parse this, but this one seems most accurate to me). However, the issue of who starts at QB, although important, is secondary to the issue of whether or not the Broncos got good value in a trade that most industry people agreed that they had to make. While it’s easy for fans to argue (as I have myself) that it would be grand and emotionally satisfying to see them sit Cutler on the bench for a while, that kind of thing can poison a locker room and distract a team already facing huge changes. It isn’t reasonable and it wasn’t going to happen. I have to say that they seemed to do very well with a tough situation.

In addition, the arrival of Tom Brandstater, who will probably suit up as an emergency quarterback and who will begin his apprenticeship under Head Coach Josh McDaniels and the two QBs ahead of him is a very good sign. Brandstater has all of the tools to become a very good backup or even a starter in the NFL. He needs time and work, and should be able to receive both.

Question 2: Who will rush the passer?

This is a great question. It was then and it still is now, prior to training camp. One of the many areas of weakness last year was the inability to get pressure on the QB (or the running back or the receivers, for that matter). Part of that will shake out from the front 3, and other than Ronnie Fields it seems open right now. But the draft yielded one Robert Ayers, lately of Tennessee, who was one of the best young DEs in this year’s options. Will he rush the QB well? This could be 
one of the questions that determines the outcome of the Broncos season (The production of Knowshon Moreno is the other).

A change in scheme is also letting them move Elvis Dumervil, Jarvis Moss and Tim Crowder to the outside and will let them create a wide variety of looks and options. Moss's and Dumervil's weakness against the run made them less effective coming in from the outside - the change in scheme could create a better disguise for what they are going to do. Denver will be moving towards a full time 3-4 defense, but will give a lot of different looks over the course of the season. See here for SlowWhiteGuy’s helpful look into one way to view this change.

We're going to rush the passer with scheme as well as players, as hoosierteacher pointed out with his excellent series on the Ted Blocker.

Question 3: Who will be the playmakers and create turnovers? Do we have enough speed?

To me the first section was and is the biggest question. Who will be the playmakers? You need to look at this question from two angles. If, by this, you mean to create turnovers (And it seemed that was the thrust of the question) there was a quick response by the Broncos. The answer was to redo the entire secondary, with only a scant few holdovers. They are looking to Andre' Goodman and Alphonso Smith as well as Champ to knock down and pick off passes, to Darcel McBath (David Bruton may take longer to mature, but he has the potential to be a lot more than a special teams player) to learn centerfield and look for opportunities, and Brian Dawkins and Renaldo Hill to prevent the kind of repetitive big plays that hamstrung them in the 2008 season.

I'm not huge on extrapolating stats. The players get injured or have a career year, the scheme changes and with few exceptions, rookies aren't going to get what they did in college. Still - you have to look at the overall stats to see where you were and what needs to change. When you add up last year's turnovers versus our new starters, the new players so far outdid the Broncos measly 13 defensive turnovers that you have to be impressed, and Alphonso Smith was brilliant at creating turnovers in college - fumbles as well as interceptions. The emphasis in training camp has included new drills on how to function if you're the 2nd or 3rd player to a tackle - you generally ignore the man (if he's going down) and hammer on the ball. It wouldn't even matter if he's getting away from Tackler 1 as long as you get the ball loose. Watching film from last year, it was clear that we did that erratically, but not with any consistency. We lost several fumbles to teams that used this practice. Will we be better? I hope so. Are we better prepared via personnel and approach. Assuredly.

If by playmaking you mean 'coming up big with plays to stop drives' you would have to include the massive restructuring of the front 7 as well. Ayers, Doom, Moss, Woodyard, probably Reid and certainly Williams in some degree of rotation, probably with A. Davis at LILB to start, will have to step up. I'd expect Spencer Larsen to be a backup to start and to be moved around from special teams to fullback to inside linebacker, although he may well take the job at linebacker later in the season or in next year's training camp. Fields has been noted by a few writers as the steal of the off-season, and there's reason to believe that since his explosion off the snap was the best on the 49ers D-Line last year. There are too many options for NT and DE to cover here, but that fact in and of itself makes my point. There will be no shortage of folks who can step up. The question of whether they will step up will begin to be answered in training camp.

I did look with interest on the part of this question that involved speed. I'll concede part of the issue - Shanahan drafted for speed for a long time, but we ended up with a smorgasbord of players, styles and abilities due to the revolving door at defensive coordinator and the accompanying revolving personnel door. We became neither fish nor fowl, although we managed foul pretty well.Many of our most recent pickups aren't incredibly fast nor incredibly slow. Bruton looks to be a backup - he's incredibly fast for a safety. McBath is just fast. Smith - there will always be an asterisk in my mind around the players from this year's draft. The timing was flat-out off. He's not a burner, but neither is he slow.

Most importantly, the scheme that we are setting in motion will use more zone coverage to minimize the issues of speed. We drafted fairly well for speed as well - Darcel McBath is in the 4.58 range, Bruton  was in the 4.46, A. Smith was 4.51, not a burner but very quick and agile. Ayers only had a 4.9 40 - slow for a linebacker, but good for a defensive end. Jarvis Moss, on the other hand, is a 4.7 40 guy. Overall, I'd still have to say that Lombardi has a point. Scheme will have to help us here or we'll see issues from it, but I'm Ok with that as we stand now..

Question 4: Coverage and Interceptions

This is a great question. My own feeling is that they had answered it in spades at both the cornerback and the safety positions before the draft and filled out the answer sheet in depth during the NFL draft. Champ is healthy, they added Alphonso Smith in the draft  and Andre Goodman in free agency. Jack Williams or Josh Bell will have to step up to stay on the team. They also did 'a little' at the safety position, with Brian Dawkins there to anchor the team and Renaldo Hill to start. Behind them are three young players, all distinct and with different skillsets.

Jerry Angelo got my honest appreciation for this comment in a recent National Football Post article by Matt Bowen. It brought out some issues on our safeties. 

"...it's obvious that Angelo sees the safety position as a concern heading into this summer, and not just in Chicago.

"It's the poorest-played position in football right now," he said. "It's very hard to find a safety that can tackle high to low," meaning players who can tackle from the free safety spot in the open field.  As Angelo said, there's so much emphasis placed on athleticism and ball skills at the position that sound tackling has become a thing of the past. "

This is one area where Angelo and I are in full agreement, and when I read it I suspected that our own Hoosierteacher wouldn't argue much with us either. In fact, I took this chance to ask him about this remark and appreciated his reply so much that I wanted to include it here:

"The big problem with safeties (in my opinion) at many levels of football is the mistaken belief that they are just extensions of the cornerback position.  This line of thinking has safeties valued for the ability to race to a passed ball and intercept or disrupt.  But this is not the classic role of safeties, and the effect of this type of thinking is what has hurt the position.

Safeties are, above all else, the last line of defense.  They must be sure, open field tacklers because they are intended to stop any ball carriers (runners or receivers) that get past the front seven and corners.  The ability to tackle, speed, and read plays are the most important ingredients.  When one of those skills (almost always "tackling") is sacrificed to get a safety with "good hands" for interceptions", the position suffers.  Good hands should be seen as icing on the cake for a safety, not as a requirement."

In addition to the pleasure of a chance to learn from MHRs master of Xs and Os, the other thing I love is that along with Josh Barrett, the Denver Broncos now have three young, hard hitting safeties (Barrett, David Bruton, McBath) that can play on special teams and who love to make tackles. Having lacked a decent backfield general for years, the Broncos suddenly find themselves with a plethora of riches among the veterans and the youngsters. Will they keep all of them, or will Vernon Fox make the team. I'm better that Fox falters in training camp, but I could be wrong.

With Renaldo Hill starting as the season opens and both McBath, the current heir apparent and David Bruton behind him both having great scouting reports as bright players and sure tacklers, the Broncos are finally paying attention to the defense as a unit, rather than to one position (cornerback, for example, or DE) during one draft and a second position (DL) the next. The upgrade of quality, with new FA players brought in at all positions and a lot of great young talent there from the draft and an unparalleled CFA class, is pointing towards a huge change from the past two years and brings a smile to my face.

By the way, this article on safeties and on Rodney Harrison in particular, also by Matt Bowen is a better than average look at the position and the skills it requires. 

I've mentioned this, but have you noticed that the Broncos have more talent in the defensive backfield than at any time in modern memory? Think about it. With Champ Bailey and probably Andre' Goodman starting and Alphonso Smith able to bring his zone coverage skills to the table as a nickel back, we finally have a decent crew at cornerback. Even better, Goodman and Hill have played well together in the past so we've got some built-in continuity. There will be changes in scheme and terminology, granted, but these two know and understand each others tendencies. Even better, they are paired with Champ and Brian Dawkins, who brings instant leadership and drive to a secondary that last year was best described as ‘porous'. We are much, much better than we were last year.

Question 5: Can Casey Wiegmann play, and can the Broncos play physical football?

Let's move on to the second issue right away. I know that Lombardi meant this in terms of the offensive line, but it's such a good question that I though we should look at the entire team this way. The Broncos gave up way too much to other teams in terms of physicality last year and prior to that. Shanahan preferred speed to size; there are arguments both ways. I'm of the school that wants both, but will take the speed guys if they (and Wesley Woodyard is my favorite current example of this) like being physical, regardless of size, and enjoy taking on the challenge of a team trying to out-muscle them.

It's not necessarily a situation of preferring one or the other. Lots of players give you both - look at Ryan Clady on offense or Ron Fields on defense, each of whom is very fast /explosive/agile for their position. We have quite a few examples of getting both now - David Bruton ran a 4.46 40 at Combine and had the third highest number of tackles on Notre Dame in 2008. NFLDraftScout.com calls Bruton a playmaker "with the size, speed and athleticism to potentially be a good starter and very good special teams player." (There's video at the link I provided).  Then there's the physicality of players like Robert Ayers, Alphonso Smith (who was referred to by Jonathan Hull of fantasyfootballjungle.com as the Steal of the Draft) and Jack Williams, all of whom are fast but not burners, yet incredibly tough players.

It's interesting to me that Buckhalter is still our fastest running back (Yes, even despite his knee surgeries) and that Hillis is just slightly (.02 - .04 seconds) faster than Moreno, yet Moreno's nimbleness has astonished people, while Hillis just runs them over like gophers in the road. Toughness - would anyone out there take Selvin Young and Andre Hall over Moreno and Hillis when it comes to toughness? I'm just asking. Toss in Buckhalter and Jordan and our squad is even stronger. I know - the injuries last year did seriously hurt the Broncos RB squad, but even so... Top to bottom, we just have a much better group at RB. We have a question mark at Torain, but we brought in a couple of young guys to cover us if Torain doesn't get well (don't be surprised if they get him on IR to start the season and to give themselves an option later when there are 2009's injuries to deal with). But toughness? It's a very new year, and for that I'm thankful. This is a tough bunch of guys.

When Parcells won the Super Bowl against the LA Rams in January of 1991, he leaned over to Will McDonough for the Boston Globe who had also been a long time friend, and while waiting for the post game press conference to begin he loudly whispered two words: "Power Football!" During the days following conference, he noted the same thing twice more:

"...I've coached this game for a long time, and I know one thing," said Parcells, two days later. "Power football wins games." He then repeated it, just for emphasis.

Personally, I love speed but I know that Parcells was often right. I  believe that speed has to be paired equally with the ability to match up, stand up and finish up.  That takes power and strength (and scheme, which we often lacked). Games are usually won in the 4th quarter and we lost too many that way, whether by lack of strength or lack of conditioning. Our free agent acquisitions like Brian Dawkins, Renaldo Hill and Andra Davis are also very mentally tough, as is undrafted college free agent Rulon Davis, for example (Davis also has run his 40's in as little as 4.8, although his combine time was 5.06). Tough wins games. Tough generates the stats that correlate to wins. Given the smaller, lighter DEs that we've found ourselves with (Moss, Doom, etc), turning them into bigger linebackers makes a lot of sense. We also added a little weight, players like Fields, Parker and Askew

Moving back to the first part of the final question - How about Casey Wiegmann and the physicality of the Broncos O line approach? There are two good questions here. Can Wiegmann play another year? He says that he can and the Broncos have responded with a 2 year contract so they obviously believe him. The odds are very good, and yet the Broncos had the sense to hedge their bets. They drafted two good offensive linemen. They have Kory Lichtensteiger as the guard/center apparent, Tyler Polumbus at tackle, new center Blake Schlueter and an assortment of other options. 'Steiger has a reputation for toughness that borders on sheer nastiness and he's down to 295 of rock muscle (from up to 310 lb) and dropped some soft weight. Our new offensive lineman, Seth Olsen, was described by draftcountdown.com as "Very tough...Plays with a  nasty  demeanor" and plays at about 306 lb. Just our new kind of guy - he was also elected as a member of the Leadership Group in all four of his playing seasons for the Iowa Hawkeyes.

Wiegmann is light for his position - listed at 285. The guys behind him are a little bigger - 'Steiger at 295, even Schlueter at 290 - but adequate for a zone blocking center (Denver will add other blocking schemes, and actually used to use some other schemes, but we will keep the predominance of the ZB). The question will be whether they can play with technique and leverage - for the ZB, that's the real issue.

As far as being physical, by the end of last year the Broncos were playing much more physically on offense. Their run blocking was a work in progress last year - by the end, they were hammering out holes for people that you either hadn't heard of or didn't want to, but the holes kept coming anyway. The relative size of Seth Olsen gives us a clue as to the direction they will go in – the retention of line coach Rick Dennison says a lot for the zone blocking approach, but they will be adding other blocking schemes as well. They may be looking at bigger guards than they have used in the past. Ryan Clady’s 325 lb. goes a long way towards creating a bigger, tougher line, and the genius of their zone blocking scheme will always put more of a premium on athleticism than just sheer road-grader size. Olsen is big but not huge at 306 yet he's very strong and late rounder Blake Schlueter is smaller yet very athletic (and mean). He's more of the lineman that Denver used in the past, but something about him drew the Xanders/McDaniels team to him. That 'something' was simple - he's incredibly fast, agile and tough as nails, is a master of the knockdown despite his lighter weight (leverage and technique are big tools for him and wields them like sledgehammers) and was a team captain in his junior and senior year.

I'm still not sure about Ben Hamilton. He just didn't seem quite the same guy. Could just have been the year off, maybe something else was going on. I don't see any signs that it was concussion-based, by the way. I do wonder if he's vulnerable to an in-camp challenge by a younger guy. McDaniels has shown one thing - he's not huge on sentimental holdovers.He needs to win.

You could also question this one issue from Lombardi: I'm pretty sure that Casey Wiegmann, among others, out-played, disarmed  and diffused Kris Jenkins and a host of other players. It seemed, after looking at the numbers and the tape, as if the Broncos O line was pretty physical themselves. I thought that the physicality questions were better asked of the rest of the team, but maybe that's just me.

Conclusions:

Michael Lombardi asked a lot of good, insightful questions regarding where the tam came from at the end of last year and where it's trying to go. What stands out to me is how well these questions were answered. In looking back at the players that we (often mercifully) let go, the free agents acquired and the way that we handled the draft, the Broncos did a solid job of providing players that answer what I thought  were fair, sensible queries.

They ranged from the quarterback to the pass rush, to playmakers at each level of the defense, to the quality of the secondary and defensive backfield and back again to offense. There was one question on Casey Wiegmann and another on the level of physicality on the Bronco, particularly the offensive line.  Frankly impressed at how well they’ve answered them to the extent that they can, pre-training camp. I think that every team has a high level of expectation from the fans during the weeks prior to training camp. A certain allure can abound, sometimes realistic, sometimes false. How do you tell which is which?

I think that there are several means. We cannot truly understand how the Broncos are matching players to scheme simple because we do not, cannot know the schemes. But many of us have done substantial work on the statistics and schemes that our current coaches have used in the past. We've done more analysis of last season than any year in my memory (our available tools improve as does the quality of the people we have researching and writing). We can look at who stayed, who went and who was ushered out the door and consider the background and stats on those who replaced them. Taking all known factors into account, I'm impressed at how well we answered the valid and reasonable questions that were put to the Broncos early last spring. With the onset of summer, training camp is nearly in our grasp.

Bring it on!

28 recs  |  Comment 39 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great post

I love the indepth look and analysis that is provided here. I agree with all of your points and its why I say this will be the most interesting training camp and pre-season I can ever remember.

I will be watching each game with the idea of looking for some of these clues about both scheme and personnel. I do anticipate being pleasantly surprised with the improvements in all areas of the team by the time the season starts.

The organization of McD has been most impressive. He knew coming in, who had to be replaced, who needed to be retained and what work needed done. He set out to fill coaching slots with specific people to meet specific needs and it all pointed in the same direction. The same thing has applied to his FA choices and the draft picks he and Xanders have made.

He adapted to what became the Cutler situation and he has the answer for the BM situation and none of that has distracted him from his primary objectives for the team.

I always look forward to a new season, but this one is special. It really is exciting to anticipate and contemplate. Its going to be a long month.

Rec’d by the way.

by AlanC on Jul 3, 2009 11:24 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Bear!

That was well thought out, timely and well written!

I can’t help but feel we have improved our overall roster by addition of veterans and the draft and CFA class. Depth has been bolstered significantly. While there are some key questions to be answered in terms of scheme and position battles, I am excited to see we have improved our depth and our coaching staff is very impressive.

I am planning to attend camp at least once to see how the new regime organizes the sessions and try to gauge the overall demeanor of the team in terms of intensity and execution. I think the preseason this year means a lot in relative terms.

Should be fun! Thanks for the great piece. I hope everyone has a fun and safe 4th of July weekend. Blessings to you all!

by 5280FT on Jul 3, 2009 11:34 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Those were good questions.

And they have been answered well by the Broncos (and you)! Thanks for the great read this morning Bear. I concur on almost all points. Can’t wait for camp! : )

by NedBronco on Jul 3, 2009 11:51 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

thanks bear

you continue to set the bar high for excellence in posts. your insights and commentary are much appreciated

rec’d btw

Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.

Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It

by BShrout on Jul 3, 2009 12:05 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Great job Bear

Much more insightful, thoughtful and detailed than anything you’d find on ESPN, SI or any other mainstream site about the Broncos. Should be required reading for anyone covering them nationally, or football in general. Well done, sir.

I feel as if the Broncos have answered most of these questions, maybe not all, but most, and of course we won’t know for sure until games are underway.

Happy 4th of July weekend all!

by underdog on Jul 3, 2009 12:06 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Symantics...

I would say they’ve addressed the questions, I wouldn’t say they’ve answered them. We won’t know that till much later.

by T.Dot_Bronco on Jul 3, 2009 4:17 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

As always Doc,

A great Read,
Two Salmons for the Bear…
Rec’d

Real Power, comes with the realization that One cannot change the Moment;
only ones perception of it: Atitude! JQM

by UB3 on Jul 3, 2009 12:23 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

What a fantastic post, Bear!

I particularly enjoyed the offensive line synopsis. Those “nasty demeanors” are sooo necessary for this team’s success! This may be one of your finest efforts, Bear! Rec’d!

" Life is what happens while you're making other plans "

by hairybear on Jul 3, 2009 1:51 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd, of course.

You bring up a lot of great points, but one in particular excites me most about the upcoming season:

I’ve mentioned this, but have you noticed that the Broncos have more talent in the defensive backfield than at any time in modern memory?

I couldn’t agree more. I’ve always loved the secondary element of football. S is my favorite position and no play excites me more than the crunch time interception. I think this group has huge potential in both areas. It goes without saying that teams don’t ever want to be in obvious passing situations, but if the Broncos can muster a servicable pass rush, this team can be down-right dangerous on passing downs this year. I have a lot of faith in Nolan’s ability to finds ways to bring pressure, so I’m already dreaming about the return of that element to the Mile High City.

That’s the hope, at least.

There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance-- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
-- Herbert Spencer

by PredominantlyOrange on Jul 3, 2009 2:23 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Modern Memory

Depends on the definition, ;)

We are without any reasonable dispute MUCH improved in the secondary. Camp and preseason will answer my lingering questions about the Dline and pass rush. BTW, I believed our biggest defense problem last year was not the DLine even though it seemed we could not stop the run at crunch time or create pressure with the pass rush. I thought it was the secondary coaching and players. Getting rid of Slowik and adding Nolan and Nunnelly have me stoked!

Thx for the post broncobear! Great as always!

by Endzone on Jul 3, 2009 2:51 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Very nice and detailed Summation

I thought it was just me, thinking about all the turmoil from this off season. With the help of everyone here, I have delved deeper and gained more knowledge of our great team and football in general, that I believe an excellent future awaits our beloved Broncos. Just the rate of actions/change on the team is amazing and too cognizant for happenstance; there was/is definitely a plan.
 With regards to point #1, if you look at it this way. there is a lot to be happy about:
We trade a Franchise? QB away (Cutler)

in return, we pick up a Franchise?RB(Moreno) + a more than adequate QB(Orton) + an upgrade at DB + a promising TE

IMO, we can win a Super Bowl with this more than adequate QB (witness – Mark Rypien or Trent Dilfer) and a Franchise(?)RB that very well could be dominant, than with a Franchise(?) QB (witness Elway)
THAT IS History folks, and you know history repeats itself. :-)
Thanks Bear. Rec’d

"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra
"No, I'm from Iowa, I only work in outer space."

by KaptainKirk on Jul 3, 2009 3:48 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Always a good read Bear thx

Great points from all of you… I agree with Kapt Kirk regarding the fact that due to our turmoil and wild offseason that I as well have learned more about the intricacies of system football along with a better understanding of where our favorite Broncos can thrive in the new systems. Of course all starts from scratch when the pads get strapped on! But man am I ready for 2009… I can’t wait to prove all of the mainstream haters wrong!

Bleed Orange and Blue!!!! Go Broncos!!!!!

by Orange_Crush on Jul 3, 2009 4:11 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Great job Bear and Rec'd

You hit on some great points about the importance of turnovers and the safety position. In Chicago it was Urlacher who received the majority of the press, but Mike Brown was the QB of the defense. Again great and informative article!

by rocko1 on Jul 3, 2009 4:40 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Great post Bear, rec'd as usual...

Comments like this line of yours:

the Broncos are finally paying attention to the defense as a unit, rather than to one position (cornerback, for example, or DE) during one draft and a second position (DL) the next.

and this line from the first comment by Alan C:

The organization of McD has been most impressive. He knew coming in, who had to be replaced, who needed to be retained and what work needed done. He set out to fill coaching slots with specific people to meet specific needs and it all pointed in the same direction.

help to fuel the fires of my optimism. My hope is that McD really, truly is camped out on a higher strategic plateau than Shanny was, and I can’t help but think that it was this kind of coordinated vision for the team that won Bowlen over in the interview room. I’m sure McD doesn’t feel that he has all the pieces perfectly in place yet, but there are clearly signs (at least for us front porch koolaid sippers) that he’s got a well-articulated vision for the team and is sticking to it.
I, for one, have actually started hoping that the MSM never gets it—that this stealthy path to building a winning team (i.e letting your media darling pro bowl QB walk?!) rises from the depths like a U-boat before they know what hit em. If things do play out this way, it will sure be interesting to watch people start to catch on….

"I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today" -- Wimpy J. Wellington

by Broncs Cheer on Jul 3, 2009 10:11 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

bear, so many people try to say so many things,

but you filled the cup with just half a pour. Thanks for the sip…

by bfree2bronc on Jul 3, 2009 10:17 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Very good stuff, but ...

why are people so sure Robert Ayers is going to play 3-4 DE? Everything I have heard from OTA’s, Ayers and McDaniels suggest he is going to play OLB on 1st and 2nd down and then shift to DE (either in a 3-4 or 4-3) on passing downs. Josh has emphasized how he wants us to get bigger to stop the run, and putting Robert as a 3-4 DE on 1st and 2nd down wouldn’t go with this philosophy.

I feel that Josh is going to do everything he can to stop the run, and to do that he is going to put as much size on the field as he can get away with. As a Defense you can get away with being a poor pass Defense if you are solid against the run, but it does not work vice versa. If you can’t stop the run then you lose the possession battle, your Defense becomes tired and your team becomes demoralised, so I definitely see the logic in making us bigger to get better at stopping the run.

Three of the worst 5 pass Defense’s in terms of yards per game didn’t finish with losing records last year. The worst 5 run Defense’s were Detroit (picked #1 overall), Oakland (picked #7 overall), Kansas City (picked #3 overall), St Louis (picked #2 overall) and Cleveland (should have picked #5 overall). I think this highlights my point; sorry if I went off on a tangent.

by lomaxgr on Jul 4, 2009 4:04 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Good point...

Our D will be better when we stop missing tackles.
Our defense had some MAJOR issues in simple things: tackling technique and discipline in filling gaps.

Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.

by boydy2669 on Jul 4, 2009 6:06 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't need to tell you this, but

that’s coaching in spades, and a little on field leadership issues.

I don’t buy for one second that these guys can’t tackle at this level (though I do agree with Angelo’s point that some positions where the tackling should be ELITE has lost any sense of prioritization).

But if you aren’t held accountable, both by your coaches and your teammates (who suffered from their own guilt complexes in not being able to consistently execute), the little things start to slide.

There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.

by Jeremy Bolander on Jul 4, 2009 12:14 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ayers

Don’t know about so many folks, but I think so because I saw an interview with McD that included a discussion – a brief one – of using Ayers as a 3-4 DE when he’d gained a little weight. Some of Ayers predraft scouting indicated that he has a frame that can gain 15 – 20 lb of muscle yet – he’s young, physically (some folks mature later, in many ways). If that happens, he will become even more versatile. He’s unusually strong as a player – that can be nutured and developed.

Thank you for asking that – I know that some folks are confused about the source of the ‘rumor’ but I imagine that they just saw the same clip that I did.

Hillis/Moreno in '09

by Emmett Smith on Jul 4, 2009 10:04 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I doubt he puts on 20 lbs ...

One thing is for sure – we are going to use Ayers at OLB. He has been working hard with Coach Martindale, and we have heard stories of him picking off passes at OLB during OTA’s. You don’t play OLB in the NFL at 290-295lbs, so that is pretty much out of the question. I see him staying at the 270-275 range and play as a 1st and 2nd down OLB, with some 3-4 and 4-3 DE thrown in on passing downs.

by lomaxgr on Jul 4, 2009 12:19 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know I'm in the minority view on this...

…but I go along with Bear. I think Ayers was taken with the intention of playing DE. If he DOES start at OLB, I could see him bulking bulking up for DE in short order. I think we have several options at OLB (even after the dismissal of Bailey), but fewer at DE. Ayers isn’t known as being a great pass rusher, and I think he might do a better job tackling in limited space and occupying the line for the outside rushers.

This is one I’m not as confident about as some other moves (such as moving D.J. to RILB, which I felt strongly about). But I would still be a little surprised if Ayers ends up at OLB.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 4, 2009 2:01 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol - Don't shoot the Bear

He’s just the messenger. I caught the interview and I read the scouting reports. Here’s an option – he gains 10 – 15 lb of muscle. He plays rush LB, some OLB and switches to DE on downs where we are in a hybrid form – under or over. In essence, he becomes a very versatile player who is heavy for a LB (and a nightmare for a TE or RB to block) and a light DE who is strong and heavy for a 4-3 hybrid, which we may run. He would fit well in a 5-2, as SWG has pointed out.

This isn’t about being right or wrong – the management has said that they are interested in him gaining some muscle weight. We’ll see if that works out for him, and why they had that in mind. No matter what – I think that he’s a heck of a young player.

On that note – I’ve seen Fields listed as one of the steals of the offseason. I’ve seen Ayers, Smith and Moreno listed as steals of the draft. If 3 out of 4 of those are right, we could have a heck of a year.

Hillis/Moreno in '09

by Emmett Smith on Jul 4, 2009 5:30 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

then how do you explain ...

him taking almost all his reps at OLB? I could kind of envisage him putting on 10lbs and being a heavy OLB/light DE like bear said, but I highly doubt he will do that because a 285lbs OLB is still a fair bit too heavy. And we don’t have many options at OLB. Dumervil, Reid, Moss, Crowder is probably a worse group than Peterson, McBean, Thomas and a bunch of UDFA’s. He is 100% going to play some OLB, so the only thing that makes true sense is him playing OLB on 1st and 2nd down, with him shifting to DE (3-4 or 4-3) in passing situations.

by lomaxgr on Jul 5, 2009 6:13 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

lomax, I don't 'explain' anything

Like I said, I’m reporting the news. But as far as the question, he hasn’t gained the weight (assuming that he can), so he’s playing exactly where he currently fits.

One thing i can tell you is this – people are a little over-concerned with labels. Formations are evolving and Denver will be doing different things. Is someone a DE because they put their hand down on certain formations? Fair enough – are they an OLB if they don’t? How about if he stands up but is clearly in a 5-2 formation and is playing the outside slot of the 5?

The issues will be ones of match-ups and formations. I’m not concerned with ‘explaining’ what Josh McD said – I’m just passing it on

Hillis/Moreno in '09

by Emmett Smith on Jul 5, 2009 3:16 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ayers at DE or OLB

He HAS taken most of his reps at OLB. On the other hand, in practice, there is more to evaluate at that position than DE. He’s also taking reps in a large crowd. There aren’t as many players taking reps (competing) for the DE spot. He’s already going to be a known quality at DE, so there should be little to no need to evaluate him there.

I’m not saying that he’s a lock for DE. What I am saying is that I believe he fits the mold of DE more than OLB, and given our roster (heavier at OLB than DE), I think there is a good chance he primarily plays at DE. Not a sure thing, just my hunch.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 8, 2009 6:17 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Insightful Analysis

I love this site because I learn something new with every visit. Buidling a team is not as easy as the MSM and various Madden video games would have us believe.

Great article and totally Rec’d

by CockneyBronco on Jul 4, 2009 5:03 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Great big thumbs up!

We are vastly more talented player wise than last year, but the chemistry needed to make a cohesive team out of that talent is yet to be seen…..

Personally, I’m not worried at all. I think we will be vastly better than last year…especially the defense!

A proud prognostication of 10-6 in 2009!!!

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
John Adams

by Broncotodd on Jul 4, 2009 9:21 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Life is better since the enlightenment.

I found this site from a link on Yahoo NFL during the height of the Cutler saga. I would peviously get my information from the Rocky before it’s demise. I enjoyed posting my half baked (and only partially informed) opinions on Sam Adams’ column, mostly because I liked making wise-ass jokes from a blue collar fan’s perspective. Then, suddenly, there wasn’t anything to joke about with the firing of “the mastermind” and Mcdaniels potentially “trading away the franchise!”. To make matters worse, I now only had the sad sack Denver Post to keep me informed.

In the sixth year AE (after Elway), I was a Jake Plummer fan. I knew in my heart of hearts that if Jake had a line to protect him, he would lead us to the promised land, and all the naysayers would choke on their words. Then I saw a vision from heaven. This kid from Santa Claus launched a laser beam sixty yards down the field. Defensive players were blown to the side from the jet wash of such a pass. Stop the presses! Crank up the band! Throw the ticker tape! There’s a new arm in town! We would now be saved from mediocrity!

Two years later, with the bitter taste of mediocrity still lingering in my mouth, all hell was breaking loose. I was sure there were adequate excuses for the interceptions and lack of scoring. Any idiot could see that J.C. was the savior. At the same time, it was becoming apparent that there wasn’t a big man to fill the shoes of those athletic gifts and big arm. I was angry to see my hero crumble before my eyes in an adolescent temper tantrum. I joined the Mc-insult throwing morons at the Post, and wished J.C. to be banished to Detroit. The exact words were," Let him wake up and find himself as the moping moptop of the motor city".

One day, while looking for the latest gossip about my favorite Mc-soap opera, I found a link. There, before my eyes, was discussion and opinion with meat and substance… clarity of thought… educated insight. Yea through the darkness and fog shines a beacon of light!

Coming to MHR, I put the keyboard away. I was amazed at the amount of information, and the knowlege of x’s and o’s available. As I’ve continued to peruse the posts, I could actually begin to see some of the method behind the madness. Without the input from this site, I’d be scratching my head and complaining about the draft along with the under-educated MSM. I thank you for being here.

The increase in talent has become obvious. A plan is slowly revealing itself. Attention to detail will eventually prevail. Regadless of the record, I’m sure we’ll all be entertained. I’m more anxious and excited about the new season than I’ve been in quite some time.

Let the games begin!

by jayrockstone on Jul 4, 2009 11:28 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Welcome back from the Ledge Jrock

and into the huddle.

"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra
"No, I'm from Iowa, I only work in outer space."

by KaptainKirk on Jul 4, 2009 11:35 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Glad to have you amongst the living!

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 4, 2009 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Outstanding work Bear.

My only quibble might be that I don’t think Ayers will be a pass rusher. I agree with you that he’ll play DE (I think you and I are in the minority on that), but I think he’ll be more of a run stopper and line occupier. But I could be wrong to.

Great, great stuff. All the salmon and picnic baskets to you my friend!

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jul 4, 2009 2:05 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I know it won't make me popular to disagree with you, especially on a minor point,

but i get the feeling that you’d rather hear about the 0.1% that I didn’t agree with than the 99.9% I did.

Having lacked a decent backfield general for years, the Broncos suddenly find themselves with a plethora of riches among the veterans and the youngsters.

We were only without Lynch for a season- all he brought was leadership.

otherwise, great article.

by neurospasm on Jul 4, 2009 11:27 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

He was great

Our depth wasn’t. That’s about a .01% disagreement rate – I’m more unhappy with the off-color micro-fibers in the carpet….or my fur……..

Hillis/Moreno in '09

by Emmett Smith on Jul 5, 2009 12:40 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I certainly enjoyed the article,

especially this time of year. Thanks Broncobear! There are a lot of questions still be to answered. I am very curious about how they will employ Ayers, who our LOLB will be, and what the plan is for LDT.

by Orange Crush II on Jul 5, 2009 4:37 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Great

I read this one several days ago actually but I couldn’t see the link again without taking some time to comment. Great post as always Bear. Another Rec, as always.

by USMCWall on Jul 8, 2009 7:10 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Super Bowl XXV

Excellent article and conversation! I just wanted to add here, though, that Parcells and the Giants defeated the Bills in the ’91 Super Bowl (and not the Rams, who are of course in the same conference as the Giants).

by dtd1968 on Jul 8, 2009 9:05 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!
Start posting about the Broncos »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The-big-lebowski_small
The Dude Abides...It's Charger Limerick Time...Again
Milehighstadium_small
Terror Alert in Chicago
Small
Understanding the NFL Running Game
Small
Understand the Passing Game in the NFL
Tahoetim_small
The Lynch Perspective - A Crossroads Edition

Recent FanPosts

Clay-davis2_small
Is Anybody There? We will win on Sunday - here's why
Broncos-1024x768_small
The Art of "The Deep Ball"
Wall1_small
First Upset of the week!
Small
Should Orton Start If Healthy?
Walter_drawn_small
Momentum: The Potential for Potential
Small
How short the leash?
Tahoetim_small
Il Duca
Denver_small
Orton missies 3rd practice - game time decision
Nelson_broncos1_small
Broncos Tickets
Avs_and_broncos_small
Orton or Simms against San Diego?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

MHR Radio

SPONSORS

Web Stuff


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

Cyborg_small Jeremy Bolander

Asst. Head Coach

Mhr_small Steve Nichols

Tahoetim_small Tim Lynch

J_elway_870111_640_small Douglas A. Lee

Plato_bust_small Emmett Smith

Denver-broncos-button_small Ted Bartlett

The-big-lebowski_small TJ Johnson

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk