Has Brandon Marshall quit on the Broncos?
The twitter world was all aflutter this morning with reports that Broncos WR Brandon Marshall was not only not working with the first team, but he was relegated to scout team duty....on DEFENSE!
Needless to say, I was waiting anxiously to hear what Brandon would have to say about this. I fought the urge to blast the Broncos and Josh McDaniels for what looked to me to be a public humiliation of the team's best offensive player. I'm glad I did, at least a bit.
Frank Schwab of the Colorado Springs Gazette broke down what Marshall had to say after and it does shed a bit of light on why Marshall would be relegated behind the likes of Matthew Willis. What did Marshall have to say?
After basically disengaging himself from practice by standing with the defensive players on the sideline and not taking any normal repetitions during 11-on-11 drills (he said it is because he is "not close" to learning the playbook), Broncos receiver Brandon Marshall reiterated he is not happy with the team. He was asked if there were irreconcilable differences with the team.
"Unfortunately, sometimes it gets to that point," Marshall said. "There are trust issues on both sides. It’s understandable. We’ve got to try our best to move forward."
He said he was starting to work past his issues with the team, but he was upset on Friday when he said a public-relations staffer told Broncos players not to act too happy for Marshall after he was found not guilty of a misdemeanor battery charge in Atlanta.
"I think the biggest thing was, it was really disappointing hearing that some of my teammates on one of the best days of ... for the past three years, of my life, some of my teammates were coached to say ‘Don’t say you’re happy for Brandon,'" Marshall said.
Obviously, whatever went down regarding instructions the players were given about their reaction to Marshall's 'not guilty' verdict has Marshall a bit annoyed.
Marshall went on to talk about his contract request, or lack of one -
"From day one I’ve never asked the Broncos for more money, and that’s from the summertime," Marshall said.
Marshall wouldn't say he asked again for a trade but said Broncos owner Pat Bowlen said back in June he would try to trade him.
"In that meeting with ownership, it was told to me they’ll do their best to accommodate me with that wish," Marshall said. "And I’m still here. I’m a Bronco and all I can do now is do my best to get in my best football shape and be that player I was the past three years."
While there is plenty of double-talk to go around, and I think both sides are being less than truthful about the facts, the one thing that really bothers me, and I mean REALLY BOTHERS ME, is Marshall's confession that he isn't "close to learning the playbook".
Think about that.
Brandon Marshall has had the ENTIRE OFFSEASON to learn the playbook, healthy or not. Marshall chose to stay away this offseason; then, once he did begrudgingly show up, failed to spend the time the past 3 weeks to get up to speed. It is his JOB as a professional to learn the playbook. If he is telling the truth, he is giving you the best example of why the Broncos are making the RIGHT DECISION not to extend his contract. It also has told 31 other teams exactly what his work ethic is like.
You learn a lot about a player when things are going well. You learn more about A MAN when things are not. Brandon Marshall is not handling this like a man. While it hurts the Broncos on the field to have a player essentially admit he doesn't want to work, it hurts Marshall a lot more exactly where he cares the most - the wallet.
7 recs |
388 comments
|
Comments
On the lighter side...
we do have plenty of ‘gruntled’ players. I’m excited to see a week’s worth of progress at preseason game number two.
by dr.mort on Aug 19, 2009 12:13 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
It looks like...
the Broncos are moving ahead with or without him. If he wants to drag his heels along the way, that’s his issue. 104.3 the Fan is reporting that the Jets made an offer for him… If it’s good enough, I say let’s go with it. Good riddance.
J
by Jezru on Aug 19, 2009 12:18 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Knowing New York and knowing Brandon Marshall
I’d predict a Plaxico Burress-type incident in 2 months time if he went to the Jets.
by NYCBronx on Aug 19, 2009 1:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I second the motion!
C’mon, lets just move on – he won’t be the player we want him to be and he clearly doesn’t want to be here. We get the Jets first rounder and we might be looking at a top ten pick. Seems fair to me – Please Mr.Bowlen just trade his ass already, enough is enough!
by quarterhorse on Aug 19, 2009 5:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem is
this is 104.3 the fan where they really don’t research anything and just speculate so until I hear what this “offer” is I think they are just reading the article in the NY Times and assuming.
by Arimaris on Aug 19, 2009 5:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
nice even keeled response
You are totally right about the situation. How can you say you are committed to the team when, even with a several week injury layoff, you don’t bother to learn the playbook.
As far as I am concerned. McD is saying – look you have no leverage and don’t even cost us that much. If you prepare like a scout team player you will work there. If you prepare like a #1 wr you will work there. You are under contract with this team and when you act like it you will play.
Does marshall think (a la crabtree) that sitting on the sidelines all year will net him a big free agent contract? Apparently so…
by jonahsilas on Aug 19, 2009 12:18 PM MDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
No Beauty In The Beast.
Brandon has shown his true colors and got lucky that his off field behavior did not ruin his football career like M. Vick. His talents may be above avg (dropped passes and running backwards) yet he’s a prima donna that the Broncos do NOT need. Obviously his role models are not Rod Smith nor Ed McCaffrey…Maybe #85 or TO. I’m proud of McDaniels for not folding in and treating him exactly what he deserves. The Broncos have all the leverage and only BMarsh is hurting his reputation among the NFL like Cutler has with the Bears.
Either we get equal value as with Cutler or keep him standing by the sidelines and make him wait it out until he becomes a free agent.
by tedwin on Aug 19, 2009 9:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
actually..
he didn’t have the offseason, the broncos don’t give out playbooks unless you are there — he wasn’t here so no playbook for him
McDaniels actually addressed this [a little] on his latest interview on denverbroncos.com
by Todd Jewell on Aug 19, 2009 12:18 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Ok....
Still his choice, whatever the reason, not to get on board….
I guess the point is, he made the choice. This is all on him.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Aug 19, 2009 12:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus he had
A multi-week injury layoff during camp to study. Reid and Powell constantly tweeting about working 8am-9pm every day.
There is no excuse. Either you are a professional, or you ain’t.
by jonahsilas on Aug 19, 2009 1:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to say
After listening to his interview today, he was less the initiator than the press was. And if I heard a couple questions correctly, Dave “the complete waste of skin” Krieger did his fair share of provoking.
I actually thought he handled the interview well. I for one think they guy who authorized telling the players to say what they were told should be fired.
The Broncos need to be smarter in their handling of these matters. They are sometimes looking foolish.
"Time wounds all heels" Groucho Marx
by dmitchell624 on Aug 19, 2009 8:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are correct, the Press was trying to get him to say he couldn't move forward
That was disgusting to listen to. He says “moving forward”, and they say, “BUT can you REALLY move forward after this?” The journalism as a profession is now as low as rats.
by MichaelCushman on Aug 19, 2009 8:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No Excuse
I am positive the Broncos would have given Marshall a playbook IF MARSHALL HAD ASKED FOR ONE.
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 12:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
With BM's
judgements so far, this doesn’s surprise me in the least. So far in his career as a football player he has done nothing but make bad decisions….why stop now? And its a real downer to air his work ethic in public, which will surely hurt his trade value!!! As well as his unknown recovery from surgery, we wont be able to get squat for him!!
Would it be an option to put him on IR or PUP to free up a roster spot?? What can the organization do besides bench him, and take up a slot on the roster? It is going to take a real desperate team to pay what we want in return for trade!
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 19, 2009 12:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking the EXACT same thing . . .
can’t we just put him on PUP and free up a roster spot. Even if we have to pay him to do it, the message would be sent, his season would be over, and ANY chance of another team offering him a big paycheck would be pretty much gone. Is this a possibility by the Broncos?
"The men who have done big things are those who are not afraid to attempt big things, who were not afraid to risk failure in order to gain success."
- B.C Forbes
by HSFBCoach on Aug 19, 2009 8:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Im torn....
BM is a BEAST and a top notch athlete that gives apposing coaches sleepless nights……
On the other hand his conduct off the field and during the off season leaves you with a bad taste in your mouth. A less talented player would have been gone a long long long time ago!
Shakespeare said it best " Parting is such sweet sweet sorrow"
Great piece…very informative!
by vdisciple on Aug 19, 2009 12:19 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Well Said
He is a beast, with the potential of being a GREAT receiver. But the physical problems alone cause pause. Plus, the “morals clause” in the NFL contracts supposedly greatly restricts the ability for teams to get back “guarantee” money, and everyone knows that his next “morals” incident will mean at least 1 year of suspension……..And, lets face it, he is a baby. The question is what do we get in return.
by JRSIII on Aug 19, 2009 6:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here we go again............
Trade the moron for whatever we can get. Get rid of the headache. There is absolutely NO EXCUSE to not know the playbook by now. I can see a player not being able to execute it perfectly yet. But when was McD hired? Marshall has had more than enough time to learn the playbook. My god,we have rookies that have learned it. If he isn’t more dedicated than that, I say bury his diva butt on the depth chart and get whatever you can for him. I’m sorry but if I am McD, I am completely pissed that B-Dork doesn’t know the playbook and I am in full support of him running 2nd or 3rd team. Why let him drag the other guys down, and why jump him over guys that have been here every day all summer. You know Fitz may not run gunner, but I’ll bet he would if he thought that would help his team win. You think Jerry Rice wouldn’t do whatever it took to win? How about EddieMac? How about Rod Smith? How many Super Bowls have Chad Ochocinco, Terrell Owens, and Keyshawn Johnson won? If B-Dork wants to act like them, then get him the hell out of here. Sorry but my patience with BM is long gone.
We gotta get nastier on D!!!!!!!!!
by Broncofan on Aug 19, 2009 12:20 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Brought that over from another post, sorry for putting it on twice but I am out of patience with BM...........
As a coach I understand a little bit the frustration he is causing the Broncos right now, especially McD.
We gotta get nastier on D!!!!!!!!!
by Broncofan on Aug 19, 2009 12:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am so sick of Broncos drama. Seriously…I can’t handle anymore. What the hell happened to this team? We’ve become a football soap opera.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Aug 19, 2009 12:21 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
It could have something to do...
with the type of players that were brought in here….I don’t know, I’m just sayin’…
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Aug 19, 2009 12:23 PM MDT up reply actions 7 recs
+1
Funny how most of the players there were brought in here (prior to this year and current regime, that is) aren’t here anymore. And the ones that are still here, well, I think the names (and their character) speak for themselves…. Bailey, Graham, Hillis, Clady, Harris, Dumervil, Stokley, Royal, Wiegmann, just to name a few….although there aren’t too many more to name. If Marshall needs to be one of the final old pieces to be purged, so be it. I’d hate to lose his talent, but at this point I don’t really care.
As always, great thoughts and perspective, Guru!
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin (Calvin & Hobbes)
by RockyMtnHigh on Aug 19, 2009 1:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very true.
"The night is darkest just before the dawn."- Harvey Dent
by broncofan91 on Aug 19, 2009 3:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with that John
Shanny lost contact with reality some where along the line
"Time wounds all heels" Groucho Marx
by dmitchell624 on Aug 19, 2009 8:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where have you been for the last two and a half years?
We’ve been a soap operas since Shanahan benched Plummer for Cutler.
D-Will
Nash
Henry
J Walker
B Marsh
Culter 1 & 2
need I go on. What we are seeing here is the legacy Shanahan left behind.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Aug 19, 2009 12:25 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
go further back
How about benching Brister for Griese? Now that you bring it up, As the Shanny Turns is a pretty good description of Denver’s off-seasons since Elway retired.
by CoastalBronco on Aug 19, 2009 1:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Daryl Gardener, Dale Carter, Maurice Clarett…
by Douglas A. Lee on Aug 19, 2009 1:35 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
-1
For making me remember Maurice Clarett. I thought I had buried that deep, deep, deep down.
"3rd and 6, Elway shotgun... Elway, scrambling, looking, running-- DIVING!!!-- inside the 5 yard line for a first down! Is he only 37?! How important is this football game? How bad does John Elway want to win this football game? Where you see the quarterbacks go down: Not Elway!"
by Sharpe as a Tack on Aug 19, 2009 8:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, Sharpe. I meant no harm…
by Douglas A. Lee on Aug 20, 2009 8:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why D-Will?
I don’t see the correlation of those names to the benching of Plummer. Are those just a list of guys that aren’t “high character”? Because if so, then D-Will shouldn’t be on the list.
by Vandylaxn21 on Aug 19, 2009 2:51 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My impression
was there was drama involved, not D-Wil’s fault…Just the Soap Opra effect
by BroncoSense72 on Aug 19, 2009 2:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but also
remember how the media tried to initially implicate D-Will. Similar to what they tried to do with Sean Taylor. I’m not saying it was necessarily any of those guys fault. Even J Walker wasn’t entirely his fault; I can’t imagine what he went through in the off season.
I’m just saying the drama isn’t really all that new. This is different drama, but not new.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Aug 19, 2009 3:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you completely
I guess I was not too clear myself with my verbiage
by BroncoSense72 on Aug 19, 2009 3:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
well there was the Marshall/Walker effect that night
"Time wounds all heels" Groucho Marx
by dmitchell624 on Aug 19, 2009 8:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
actually if memory serves....
….the drama that preceded D-Will….Brandon Marshall in an “altercation”
by jayhawk bronco on Aug 20, 2009 5:33 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Drama is everywhere in all situations these days
An outcome of social networking and a plethora of newshounds, professional or otherwise. The drama has always been there. It’s just more thoroughly pointed out these days.
In regard to the player Marshall, his immaturity is now front and center. To use another cliche, he is putting the cart before the horse (Bronco?). He wants paid before he performs any further as opposed to performing to fulfill his contract in order to get paid at the level he desires.
He apparently cannot see that the reasons he is not getting his contract re-negotiated are all on him. He is a basket case waiting to be suspended. He is coming of injuries that are apparently severe enough to keep him off the field. His team actions and actions on the field have not proven one way or the other he can still perform, let alone want to perform.
As with the player Cutler, he seems to be getting either no sound advice or terrible advice.
Perhaps this can be resolved by renogiating his contract after all. Pay him minimum scale and put all the incentives in field performance, team commitment, and game day availability.
He is acting like a Sales Rep rather than a player. Pay him like one.
by Broncos Rule on Aug 19, 2009 3:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remember when Shanny considered bringing in TO? We’ve come a long way baby!
by lolcopter on Aug 19, 2009 12:25 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Are you serious Marshall?
You want to be paid like one of the best receivers in the game and you don’t even know your playbook? What kind of message does that show, it shows that you dont take your craft seriously, it shows that you are immature when thinks dont go your way, and it shows that you have no problem letting your teammates down by not giving your best effort for the team. I understand that you are disgruntled but I know you love your teammates so if you don’t want to work hard for the broncos, at least work hard for your teammates! I honestly think this will end up being about nothing, he will learn the playbook because I still don’t think Marshall has any quit in him and this will eventually blow over……
by milehighinTO on Aug 19, 2009 12:22 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
He should be kept off the field
Until his attitude changes, he is a sideline poison the team would be best served without. I say bench him but don’t trade him or discuss contract extensions until he proves his hip, checks his attitude and becomes a team player. Anything less would reward the man-child for ridiculousness and tell the Ryan’s, Royal, Scheff, Hillis and others exactly how to get whatever they want whenever they want it
by elvisalex on Aug 19, 2009 12:23 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Sounds like a great idea.......
Lets pass it on to McD!
by vdisciple on Aug 19, 2009 12:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
HAHA! Nice
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Aug 19, 2009 12:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
As the Stomach Turns
"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra
"No, I'm from Iowa, I only work in outer space."
by KaptainKirk on Aug 19, 2009 3:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know what the worst part about this is?
If Marshall stays with Denver and DOESN’T learn the playbook, Denver will waste a member of the 53 roster on him because they won’t cut him. If they can’t get a good trade for him, he’s going to waste a spot that could have gone for someone that wants to be here.
That’s a really crappy situation for McD.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 12:26 PM MDT reply actions 2 recs
LOL..
just asked the same question above before I read this….oops
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 19, 2009 1:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
There it is...
I was going through the comments looking for when/if someone was going to address this point…Should have known it would be you joe…We need 53 that want to be here and play for this Team
Maybe we need to start looking for ANY trade so we can cut our losses and get back to getting this Team focussed on the task(s) at hand…
Rediculous!!!
by BroncoSense72 on Aug 19, 2009 1:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully that's not the angle Marshall is playing for
= (
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 19, 2009 2:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
or not playing for, as it were
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 19, 2009 2:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Injured reserve
Out all year…case solved.
by Broncos Rule on Aug 19, 2009 3:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bingo! You called it!
Takes care of everything. Sit his butt for the year. “No soup for you” Brandon Marshall!
"The men who have done big things are those who are not afraid to attempt big things, who were not afraid to risk failure in order to gain success."
- B.C Forbes
by HSFBCoach on Aug 19, 2009 8:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
that makes no sense
if you plan on not using Brandon Marshall anyway and getting rid of him next season you might as well get some sort of compensation out of it. At least with a trade you can prevent him from seeking revenge on the Broncos by signing with the Chargers or Chiefs in the off season
Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.
by 808NaNz808 on Aug 20, 2009 3:03 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not gonna get much for this guy
I remember watching this kid when I was living in Orlando and he was at UCF. I was so happy when the Broncos selected him because I knew we had made a great choice. Little did I know….
I think Rod Smith needs to stick a cleat up the Beast’s rear and boot him out of Denver. Unfortunately, the Jets don’t have much to offer other than a 1st rounder next year.
Maybe we should just bench the idiot for the season.
by SinDonor on Aug 19, 2009 12:27 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
They could give us Sanchez
hahahaha just kidding.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 12:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'd be lucky to get a first rounder at this point
Unless a starting receiver goes down for the year with an injury and some team gets desperate, his trade value is likely dropping sharply
Belief is accepting something because you’ve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.
by Hercules Rockefeller on Aug 19, 2009 12:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I say they hold him until week 3 or 4 of preseason.
Someone somewhere WILL go down. It always works out like that.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 12:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin (Calvin & Hobbes)
by RockyMtnHigh on Aug 19, 2009 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jets have no WRs 'cept the Crotch.
They’d love to have BMarsh there to improve Sanchez’ chances of doing anything positive this year. NY ’s MSM are high-maintenance whores.
Also, last I checked, there are quite a few teams that would love to have a happy, healthy BMarsh. Maybe the entire NFC East, all of our AFC West foes, Baltimore, Rams…. any others?
by SinDonor on Aug 19, 2009 12:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, last I checked, there are quite a few teams that would love to have a happy, healthy BMarsh. Maybe the entire NFC East, all of our AFC West foes,
No thank you…
Marley will be walking soon...she could probably play Linebacker better than some of the guys we had.
by PVChiefsfan on Aug 20, 2009 6:22 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do NFL teams take out insurance on their players?
If so, somebody give Tonya Harding a call to see if she can get a goon to pummel “The Bee-atch” with a sack of oranges or something.
;-D
by SinDonor on Aug 19, 2009 12:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
ROFL!
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 19, 2009 1:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't Rod Smith sort of mentoring Marshall at one point (even if in a limited capacity)?
What happened with that? I haven’t heard their names connected for quite a while. Maybe Rod washed his hands of this knucklehead realizing he didn’t want his name associated with him anymore, which would be saying something because Rod is not a “throw in the towel, give up” kind of guy.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin (Calvin & Hobbes)
by RockyMtnHigh on Aug 19, 2009 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can mentor all you want
but if he’s too knuckleheaded to listen what can you do?
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Aug 19, 2009 2:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rod
I don’t remember his exact quote, but yes. Rod has washed his hands of BMarsh.
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 2:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that after Rod...
washed his hands, Cutler steped in and gave him a crash course on the finer points of the ME game….lets get our numbers to pro bowl level…forget the team….they suck anyway…let get ours so we can get OUR big payday…..or something along those lines….and Jay topped it off by giving him the final lesson by throwing him under the bus when Marshall side tracked his side of the deal with his off-field problems….just a blue and orange tinted observation…
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 19, 2009 2:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that would be the most responsible thing
is just to bench him unless he shows some Rod Smithisms here and there.
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 19, 2009 3:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If being acquitted at a trial is one of the happiest days of your life
Then your life is kind of messed up.
If all Brandon can do is whine that some of his fellow employees weren’t allowed to publicly comment on his legal proceedings, then it shows that in his mind, everything the Broncos do at this point is nefarious. What’s that called…confirmation bias or something like that?
It’s probably too late to save this relationship.
by creamy on Aug 19, 2009 12:28 PM MDT reply actions 8 recs
Yeah, as a defense attorney and former prosecutor
even I was appalled listening to Sandy Clough on the the way back from court today talking about how Brandon Marshall should be upset that the team wouldn’t let his mates celebrate his “victory.” What a great thing to celebrate, a relationship gone so awry that violence is the norm—even if a jury found it justified. I’m thinking “So what if it was the owner, coach, or some p.r. underling that told the team not to comment?” I mean, really, should Champ Bailey come out and say “Great WIN for Brandon!! His attorney really tore his ex up! Yeah, were stoked that Brandon got himself into a volatile relationship and struck his girlfriend on more than one occassion, but a jury found he didn’t have the intent to injure her in the heat of the moment and that striking her maybe justified, so he was acquitted. Again, GREAT WIN for Brandon!”
Give me a break, it’s not a win and it’s not something to celebrate . . . it’s tragic, dysfunctional, and no one “wins” a domestic violence trial. It may be a relief that it’s over and no one got hurt seriously and something that Brandon Marshall can hopefully learn from, but shame on Sandy Clough for even thinking it was something to celebrate.
by lawb0y on Aug 19, 2009 7:04 PM MDT up reply actions 3 recs
I was sickened by Clough
That guy clearly thinks he’s the smartest guy in the room, and yet it never seemed to occur to him that cautioning the team about acting too jubilant over an acquittal on charge 13 that you’ve beaten your woman isn’t a particularly bad bit of advice, from a PR perspective.
But then, admitting that would mean that Clough couldn’t pretend indignation and call out McDaniels as dishonest and arrogant, and call out the Broncos organization as no longer having class.
It was repulsive to listen to — made even more so by the fact that the call-in lemmings seemed to back him.
by JeffG on Aug 19, 2009 7:14 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
What we believe
about the appropriateness of celebrating his “victory”, and my opinion about that is the same as yours, does not in my opinion justify micromanaging his teammates’ reactions to the outcome of the court case. The issue is not whether it’s appropriate to react that way. It’s whether it’s appropriate to script every word that comes out of the players’ mouths, including apparently the width of their smiles.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Aug 19, 2009 8:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Respectfully
I disagree. If Pat Bowlen and/or Josh McDaniels and/or Brian Xanders don’t want their organization to appear to be celebrating an ugly situation, it’s within management’s perogative to craft the message that the organization sends. It’s their organization.
Moreover, I haven’t heard any report that players couldn’t express their support for Marshall; rather, it was to be couched in terms of a distraction removed being good for the team. If Marshall takes that as a slight, for which he was issued a public apology, that seems to prove Creamy’s point.
by lawb0y on Aug 19, 2009 8:52 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
Absolutely
Employees are coached by PR every day. After every interaction I have with the press, I get emails coaching me to tweak my words. People who speak to the press regularly should be coached by the people responsible for setting the tone.
Privately, what they say to Brandon is another matter. If that is where this went, then the Bronco’s PR guy crossed the line. If it has to do with their reaction for public consumption, that’s a PR issue and employees are expected to take guidance from those responsible for messaging.
by MichaelCushman on Aug 19, 2009 9:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with lawboy here
“Script every word” seems to be a bit overblown. Like lawboy points out, it wasn’t (according to the only info we have) a script that denied them to support Marshall, it just cautioned them to temper any enthusiasm they might have regarding the outcome. We can only speculate regarding the reason for this, but it is at least plausible that it is the reason we are offering— that the organization didn’t want to present the appearance of rejoicing over a player being found “not guilty” in a domestic violence suit. I’m perfectly fine with that level of control over a potentially PR-damaging situation.
"3rd and 6, Elway shotgun... Elway, scrambling, looking, running-- DIVING!!!-- inside the 5 yard line for a first down! Is he only 37?! How important is this football game? How bad does John Elway want to win this football game? Where you see the quarterbacks go down: Not Elway!"
by Sharpe as a Tack on Aug 19, 2009 8:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
This is an organization speaking with a unified and appropriate tone. Marshall is trying to take a page out of Bus Cook’s book of obnoxious tricks.
Imagination is more important than knowledge. A. Einstein
by Ponderosa on Aug 19, 2009 9:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trying and failing
Trying to elicit sympathy from the public over the appropriate response to a verdict in a nasty drawn out list of domestic violence cases is a road to nowhere. The domestic violence card will trump anything his fans can come up with in an argument, while the Broncos had no trump card in Cook’s charade (except for the whole thing about not answering his boss’s calls, but on a basic level I think most people would love to ignore their boss too (-: ).
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 12:33 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man,
You said a mouthful. Right on is all I can add to that.
Take my advice, I'm not using it !!!
by grind_core on Aug 19, 2009 8:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sandy Clough is a waste of life!
Most moronic man I have ever listened to. HE HAS ABSOLUTELY ZERO KNOWLEDGE OF FOOTBALL OR TEAM. I have now got to the point of not listening to 104.3 just because of him . . . we should all do it.
"The men who have done big things are those who are not afraid to attempt big things, who were not afraid to risk failure in order to gain success."
- B.C Forbes
by HSFBCoach on Aug 19, 2009 8:51 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'm in CO Springs, so I don't get The Fan
Except for a few brief, fuzzy bursts. The bits I’ve heard are just atrocious.
"3rd and 6, Elway shotgun... Elway, scrambling, looking, running-- DIVING!!!-- inside the 5 yard line for a first down! Is he only 37?! How important is this football game? How bad does John Elway want to win this football game? Where you see the quarterbacks go down: Not Elway!"
by Sharpe as a Tack on Aug 19, 2009 8:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm in the Springs too
But I had court in Douglas County today. I used to like to listen to the Fan when I had to drive to the Metro Area, at least when they were the Avalanche station. After the last couple of trips this off season though . . .
by lawb0y on Aug 19, 2009 9:35 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This guy is unbelievable
When he had all of his legal issues, who stood behind him? Pat Bowlen and the Denver Broncos. When he “slipped on a McDonalds bag”, who stood behind him? Pat Bowlen and the Denver Broncos. When he skipped the mini-camp, who stood behind him? Pat Bowlen, Josh McDaniels, and the Denver Broncos.
When is this clown going to understand that he owes the Broncos, not the other way around? They’ve given him everything, and all he wants is more.
"Speak softly and carry a big (hockey) stick." - Theodore Roosevelt
by wtnelson on Aug 19, 2009 12:30 PM MDT reply actions 3 recs
After three years, if he doesn't get it
he won’t.
"Talk about the Broncos and I'm gonna 'put my dukes up'. I'm gonna hit you with these rings." -- Rod Smith's rebuttal to Jamie Dukes
by broncosmontana on Aug 19, 2009 6:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've mentioned
before that psychology suggests that if an individual is a certain way at 20 (good or bad traits apply here) that more than likely they will be that way at 30, 40 etc..
I don’t think there is anything wrong with wanting to get paid, but it should be gone about the right way. Clearly Marshall is doing it The Marshall Way.
Take my advice, I'm not using it !!!
by grind_core on Aug 19, 2009 8:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've tried to stay mellow and even-handed, but.....
This is flipping ridiculous. The Jets like money and want butts in the seats. I bet they’d give up a lot — too much, since any actuary would tell you to stay away from this walking time bomb. I’d love to see how Marshall gets along with Rex Ryan, a man who with seven Napoleon complexes crammed inside him.
As a bonus, we’d get to watch as several trolls just…. explode…. and the inarticulate nicknames for McDaniels spiral into the thousands.
I’m going to put the over-under at a 2nd and 4th-round picks. Any takers?
by Chibronx on Aug 19, 2009 12:33 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I think New York would give way too much for him.
For some reason, I have a feeling that New York would give up much more just to have him there. Sanchez needs a new toy out there, and they think Sanchez will bring them a championship. IF there is a trade, I bet NY throws a playmaker in as well as a 3rd or 4th rounder.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 12:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, I'll put you down for "over."
But as far as playmakers go, isn’t the cupboard pretty bare around there? Not that they have anything to worry about. Rex Ryan is going to fix it by talking tough. That’s awesome, and it makes you a man. Talking a lot.
by Chibronx on Aug 19, 2009 12:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jenkins
What about a player-for-player…Marshall for Kris Jenkins?
"Mr. President, call in the National Guard! Send as many men as you can spare! Because we are killing the Patriots! They need emergency help!"
by bronco-Maine-iac on Aug 19, 2009 1:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are we allowed
to trade him to the UFL?
by BroncoSense72 on Aug 19, 2009 2:01 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
LOL
Lady, you want me to answer you if this old airplane is safe to fly? Just how in the world do you think it got to be this old?
— Anon
Both optimists and pessimists contribute to the society. The optimist invents the aeroplane, the pessimist the parachute.
— George Bernard Shaw
by Choochoobonewagon on Aug 20, 2009 1:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd guess
2nd in 2010and 2011. I’d be happy with2 #2s. I think a two in 2011 is equal to a 4th in 2010.
"Sanity is the realization that everyone is insane to some degree." Me
by 3nS on Aug 19, 2009 12:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it has to be valued more highly than that. The "overs" have it!
by Chibronx on Aug 19, 2009 12:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
On second thought
I’d say conditional. If BM plays like last year then it’ll be over, if he doesn’t come close it’ll be under.
"Sanity is the realization that everyone is insane to some degree." Me
by 3nS on Aug 19, 2009 12:51 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two #2s would be fantastic
sold
by CoastalBronco on Aug 19, 2009 1:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that's too much value
Remember we got Javon Walker (a 1000 yard, big number receiver guy) coming off injuries with attitude problems for a 2nd rounder.
I doubt we’d get much more than that for a time-bomb diva likely to be suspended someday coming off hip surgery who has some nerve damage in one of his hands after putting his forearm through glass.
by dr.mort on Aug 19, 2009 1:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you, although it’s important to note that Javon’s injury was far more serious that Brandon’s. That’s not to belittle Brandon’s injury, but Javon had blown out his knee
by Douglas A. Lee on Aug 19, 2009 1:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about this
The Jets are ALWAYS willing to give up high draft picks for immediate impact. Brett Favre, Kris Jenkins, Lito Sheppard anyone? How about trading up to get both Sanchez AND my guy Shonn Greene in the draft this year? They have absolutely NO problem getting rid of draft picks. That being said, I think we could strike a deal where we get Jerricho Cotchery and a second round pick. The Broncos aren’t going to trade Marshall for 2nd and 4th round picks. Are we as fans even blown away by that deal? The Broncos need to be blown away by the offer, just like they were for Cutler, or Marshall stays for this year at the very least.
by Sayre111589 on Aug 19, 2009 1:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
As much as I want to see Marshall on the field, and being a great weapon for us, I just think it’s not going to happen. He doesnt want to be here. We might keep him and be last on the depthchart, until he becomes a free-agent. What did we gain? Nothing… We might as well trade him and at least get something of value in the process.
Imagine the MSM blow up (and blow us as Broncos up) when we trade him. Im not going to be on the internet that day…
That being said… I think our offense is good enough without him. With him it would just be better.
Bleeding Orange & Blue in The Netherlands
by BroncosNL on Aug 19, 2009 12:34 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
The Marshall Plan
I can’t help but wonder if he is doing this on purpose to lower his trade value. This way he can stick it to the Broncos in that they have to accept something less then they would have liked, then he’ll turn around and act like an angel and a superstar receiver for another team.
Is that logical or realistic?
"I'm not really good at being a shifty kind of guy who likes to make moves -- I like to be a straight-line guy and run over somebody if I can."
-Peyton Hillis
by NYBronco on Aug 19, 2009 12:40 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I had this same thought yesterday...
but it really makes no sense for Marshall either. Especially considering his surgery and off-field issues. He wants a pay day now, as a security measure, because he probably has a feeling that he won’t get much better than last year.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 12:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he's that messed up in the head, then yes.
Money makes people insane sometimes. This guy makes more in a couple weeks than I do all year, so I could care less when they want to double their millions before their contract is up.
Let him sit. Or even better, design plays were he has to go over the middle and let him get CRUSHED. If he doesn’t want to play, then we can fine him and he makes nothing.
by SinDonor on Aug 19, 2009 12:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My guess is that he knows he's damaged ...
and wants his pay now before anyone finds out. Further, I would suggest he would be incapable of holding a real job outside football. So, his only play is try to get paid so that he can skate the rest of his life.
I suppose that is expecting the worst out of someone, and it is certainly commenting on a situation I know very little about. But his actions suggest to me there may be some validity in my observation.
by Broncos Rule on Aug 19, 2009 3:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
With a guy like Marshall, the Broncos could do the same thing the Eagles did with T.O and Deactivate him every week….
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Aug 19, 2009 12:43 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
What do you mean?
I’m a little confused with all the terminologies.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 12:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
He would be on our roster
but inactive each week. Kind of like Tim Crowder last year. Doing this with BMarsh would be lose-lose for us though.
by ButteBronco on Aug 19, 2009 12:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not necessarily
If he is a restricted free agent at the end of the season, we get something when someone signs him.
by jonahsilas on Aug 19, 2009 1:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not as much as we would get for him in a trade right now.
On the bright side, McDanials probably wouldn’t draft Maurice Clarett with the compensatory pick.
by ButteBronco on Aug 19, 2009 2:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good idea.
That’s about where I am with this right now…
by NedBronco on Aug 19, 2009 12:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ditto!!
This is exactly what I was thinking!! We don’t trade him, he doesn’t take up a 53-man roster spot, each week, and he doesn’t get his weekly paycheck. This looks better and better every day…
"To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
by fooballa303 on Aug 19, 2009 12:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unless I misunderstand he WOULD take up a 53-man roster spot
Deactivating him doesn’t take him off the 53-man squad. It just means he’s not one of the 45 players eligible to play in that week’s game. And everyone on the 53-man squad does get a paycheck, whether they’re active or inactive that week.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Aug 19, 2009 12:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure he would...
Does it matter, though?
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Aug 19, 2009 1:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well it matters because he would be taking a roster spot away from someone that tries hard and wants to be here.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 1:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's the rub
If we keep him he takes up a roster spot and gives us nothing. If we trade him we prove once again that despite tough talk we will cave in to a player intent on pouting his way out of town. At this point I think we should just bite the bullet and get what we can for him. Changing an entrenched culture is hard to do but it has to be done if the Broncos are to get back on a winning path. We need to purge this team of its problem children. It’s dispiriting, however, that the organization, whether it was just one idiot or whether he was acting on orders from above, should have made such a bonehead move. Whoever is ultimately responsible for this fiasco, whether it was McDaniels are somebody else, needs to be called to Bowlen’s office and raked over the coals.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Aug 19, 2009 1:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's really unfortunate
Is that Marshall isn’t adult enough to understand the reasoning behind not acting ‘happy’ for the media about it.
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 19, 2009 3:18 PM MDT up reply actions 3 recs
Rec'd John -
That was basically my idea by ‘benching’ him, but like Calijoe – wasn’t certain of the terminology.
This is likely the best-case scenario, at this point.
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 19, 2009 3:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We dont
need anymore distractions. Eather extend his contract or trade him. If he doesnt like the offer and we cant get what we want for a trade, make him play special teams. I like Gurus take, treat him like TO, thats what hes has become.
live and die blue and orange
by jerry251 on Aug 19, 2009 12:45 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
DOH!!!!!
I dont hink BM is anywhere close to being the TO virus………..but he is well on his way :)
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 19, 2009 1:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
errr think not hink
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 19, 2009 1:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We can laugh at TO all we want (and I do), but at least he’s never had any legal issues…
by Douglas A. Lee on Aug 19, 2009 1:37 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
true
how nice would it be if this thread was only about marshall dressed up like lance armstrong on the practice field sidelines this afternoon because he only came out of the locker room to ride the stationary bike and loosen up those leg muscles.
by dr.mort on Aug 19, 2009 1:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
TO shows up and plays the game.
Yes, he’s a character, and some would mistake that for a cancer. He has his faults, but at this point, I’d rather take a loudmouthed TO than a legal-troubled BM
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 1:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont laugh at TO....
I laugh at the Orgainzations who think they can fix his attitude ;)
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 20, 2009 12:51 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we cave into either of his demands,
then we will never be rid of the drama. Next time it will be someone else trying to follow in BM’s and Cutler’s tracks. The only right move here is to expect him to honor his contract, and deny all trade offers that aren’t ridiculously huge, I mean offers you would have to be insane to walk away from. That being said, who in their right mind would sell the farm to pray BM doesn’t get the cops called on him again.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 12:44 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
the Jets Raiders and Redskins
Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.
by 808NaNz808 on Aug 20, 2009 3:05 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What a bummer.
Love the Broncos, don't like their Coach.
by McGeorge on Aug 19, 2009 12:46 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Truth is will Marshall will be here this time in a year....
even if he is a bronco through this entire season….how can the broncos give him the contract he seeks. If Eddie keeps playing at the level he has…than in a couple years he will require a high level contract (I truly dont want to say demand because I love Eddie and his team first attitude and I just hope he dosnt become a diva)
This is a tricky situation for managment and Id hate to be in their shoes….tho I guess if its played right we may get that second first rounder next year….tho I sure will miss seeing BM throwing around DBs
On To Victory!!!
by alacumba!! on Aug 19, 2009 12:48 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Call Arizona
see if we can get Boldin for him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
live and die blue and orange
by jerry251 on Aug 19, 2009 12:48 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Trading one problem child
for another?
Pass.
by underdog on Aug 19, 2009 12:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boldin's not a problem child.
He wants a new deal, just like Marshall.
The big difference is Boldin shows up and plays his tail off. He earns it more than Marshall does. Besides, Boldin decided to shut his mouth and go to work a couple weeks ago. He hasn’t said peep about a new deal since.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 12:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why the Cardinals probably have no interest in trading him.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Aug 19, 2009 12:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Indeed.
Arizona has what we WANT to have: 2 wide receivers that are threats all over the field.
Oh what I wouldn’t give to have Larry Fitz in orange and blue.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 12:57 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
They have what everyone wants to have.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Aug 19, 2009 1:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except Beanie Wells...
you couldn’t give me that guy.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 1:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just meant in terms of the WRs. I think Beanie will do okay. Both he and Moreno have shown why I don’t really like drafting a RB in the 1st round though.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Aug 19, 2009 1:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably fair, I think my view of him
reflects back more to last season than this one. He seems to have improved his attitude (and he’s certainly shown a lot of toughness in the past.) So I will stand down, but yeah, but as Poster says, the Cards probably aren’t interested anyway.
by underdog on Aug 19, 2009 12:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
not gonna get boldin
the reason why cards want to get rid of Boldin is b/c of the money issue
they’re not going to want to trade one WR looking for big $$$ for another
by Bustafluff on Aug 19, 2009 1:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly....
While it’s a no brainer for us it’s actually a worse off situation for them. No chance it happens
by T.Dot_Bronco on Aug 19, 2009 8:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'd have a better chance...
trading for Braylon Edwards. Not saying we should but that would be the only way we could go receiver for receiver.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Aug 19, 2009 9:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
BMarsh
Last season was the first time I visited Denver and see my beloved Broncos. They lost to Miami, and although I was sadden by the lost the team had so much promise….the offense had its moments. The team just needed a defense identity. We all know what happened this off season. I believe in the team first mentality that McD brings with him from NE, but at what cost? We lost a franchise QB (cry baby or not) and may lost the best young player on this team. This front office has time and time again made rookie mistakes that have caused a lot of miscommunication and added fuel to the fire. Where is Bowlen? why is he letting these inexperienced guy run the franchise to the ground….I mean when you have a front office official say"sorry face to face)! that front office needs to be on a short leash and some power needs to be taken away from McD…we can not afford to let him learn on the job…..come on Bowlen take charge like you said you would when you fired Shanny….
by NJ Broncos on Aug 19, 2009 12:50 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
All Wrong
NJ, you don’t know what you’re talking about. I appreciate your emotion, but there are NO facts to back up your concerns. For example, just exactly WHAT rookie mistakes are you referring to? Why is your focus only on McD? He’s not the GM. Xanders is.
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 12:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You Have No Facts to back up your mis-statements
It was Bowlen himself that told BM “He would accomodate his request” – which was for a trade. Bowlen is smart enough to not give BM away fro nothing.
To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also DREAM; not only plan, but also BELIEVE.
by Broncobh on Aug 19, 2009 2:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bowlen
Bowlen restructured the front office so that the GM and HC answer directly to him and he has publically expressed his support for McD’s handling of Cutler (and claimed responsibility for the trade) so for all we know he is 100% behind their approach on this as well!
by Timimus on Aug 19, 2009 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
time for a change
i have been a proponent of trading marshall ever since he almost pulled that stunt in the endzone last season. that told me all i needed to know, another wannabe t.o. i hope their privately shopping him for more defensive hope. i still didn’t see anything in game 1 that would alleviate my concern. he’s trying to get a new contract for 1 of 2 reasons, either because he knows his body isn’t going to recover like it was before, or he knows the new collective bargaining agreement is going to be a winner for the owners.
by golfdoc on Aug 19, 2009 12:50 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Flabergasted......
I so much wanna see our offense this year wih Marsh included, however i dunno what to think anymore. Do we really ever get fair trade out of him if we do trade him. When he plays he is worth more than a 2nd draft pick imo, but who would give us a 1st for him.
Truthfully I hope they can work this out with him, who knows?
"Baseball players are smarter than football players. How often do you see a baseball team penalized for to many men on the field?" - Jim Bouton
by diviesti on Aug 19, 2009 12:51 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
no to boldin
don’t want boldin. that would be getting the same problem as we currently have with marshall.
by golfdoc on Aug 19, 2009 12:53 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
same problem minus the injuries, minus the rap sheet.
by ButteBronco on Aug 19, 2009 12:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
minus the mouth
but PLUS the hard work preparing for a game.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 12:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I'd take Boldin in a heartbeat.
The contract stuff is the least of my worries when it comes to Brandon.
by ButteBronco on Aug 19, 2009 1:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder how bad the Jets want Marshall? Like Kris Jenkins bad?
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Aug 19, 2009 12:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
no...
more like LEEROY JENKINS bad.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 12:58 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
LEEEEEEEEEROOOOY JENKINS!
I don’t even play or like WoW…..
by SinDonor on Aug 19, 2009 12:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
me neither
but if I did I wouldn’t last long, that’s exactly how I would play.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 12:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least we’d have a chicken. Right?
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Aug 19, 2009 1:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 1:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
Joe Sakic was pure class, win or lose, at all times.
by Colorado_Kitten on Aug 19, 2009 2:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Real Bad
The Jets are definitely desperate for a quality WR.
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 1:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Guys
Defensive minded Rex Ryan is not going to trade his starting nose tackle. Not gonna happen.
Take my advice, I'm not using it !!!
by grind_core on Aug 19, 2009 1:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
But wouldn’t it be cool if he did?
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Aug 19, 2009 1:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
heck yea my man.
and I’d say do it in a half a heart beat.
Take my advice, I'm not using it !!!
by grind_core on Aug 19, 2009 1:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jets
The Jets are one of those teams that if they want someone bad enough they’ll get him. As far as getting what BM is worth, this is good news that the Jets want him.
"Sanity is the realization that everyone is insane to some degree." Me
by 3nS on Aug 19, 2009 1:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
The Jets have been doing stupid stuff for as long as I’ve been a football fan (and then some). So there’s hope for us, yet…
by Douglas A. Lee on Aug 19, 2009 1:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
see: Farve, Brett, 2008
"I want this team to be tough, smart and prepared to play well under pressure...Everybody here in this organization is going to be held accountable to do their job — their piece of the puzzle to make this team a competitor for a championship every season." J-Mac
by denver_diaspora on Aug 19, 2009 9:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just the other day
I posted a blog about how we should pay him. I am going on the record to say I jumped the gun. While he may be a beast, I think it’s high time we either trade him or bench him until he wants to get his act together. At this point, having two 100 catch seasons in your first four years should have gotten him some kind of raise, but he clearly isn’t in the upper echelon of wide outs. I’m pretty sure Moss, Fitz, Boldin, Andre etc. ALL know their playbooks. It is looking more and more like Shanahan had no clue what character means. It’s ok, folks. We have to experience our growing pains this season, and that doesn’t mean we can’t be competitive. I just think it will take all the bad seeds being purged from the team to see what McDaniels truly has to offer as a head coach. Right now it’s still partly Shanahan’s team. How can he be 100% focused on the team right now with all the controversy surrounding us as of late. He is doing a great job in the media, as he is very savvy and thick skinned. Sorry for the tangent, but it all seems to go together.
Take my advice, I'm not using it !!!
by grind_core on Aug 19, 2009 12:57 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
speed runs rampant
one thing i noticed in the preseason game was the speed/separation that mckinley, our rookie wr had. a little more concentration by him and we could have another player like royal. at least thats the impression i got watching him.
by golfdoc on Aug 19, 2009 12:58 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Hard Ball
Since day one with this junk I’ve said the same thing…bench his pansy little rear. Ruin his chances for a big paycheck if he wants to keep being such a pathetic little whiny baby. I’ve never seen someone so physically overpowering (love watching B shove CBs into the dirt after the catch) be so much of a baby since TO.
This guys is a grade A stinking pile of dung. Play ball or get out.
Yeah…any 1st round pick gets B-Marsh if I’m the GM.
GRRR
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Aug 19, 2009 12:59 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
To balance out all the negative reports
I just read today’s DB.com blog, and there is a picture there of Marshall on the scout team. Dude sure doesn’t look like he is moping – looks happy and having fun.
I am not pleased as punch with his admission that he doesn’t know the playbook, but makes me think he hasn’t quit entirely!
by jonahsilas on Aug 19, 2009 1:03 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
everything hes doing
is for money i dont buy everything hes saying
by Skotty on Aug 19, 2009 1:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
He generally looks happy and is SUCH a nice guy
You can’t go by appearances.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Aug 19, 2009 1:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
True dat
Just trying to temper my own inner flare up of indignation!
by jonahsilas on Aug 19, 2009 1:35 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
For $$ he will even play football!
by jonahsilas on Aug 19, 2009 1:08 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Flesh Eating Disease
I believe the Broncos have this horrible flesh eating disease that will do one of two things. Either it will kill us, or we’ll survive and be that much stronger for it. Right now, I can’t tell which is going to happen…it sure looks like our team won’t make it through the night(ie 2009 season). I just want to win baby.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
by Tim Lynch on Aug 19, 2009 1:08 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Have faith Zappa.
All will be well. The worst than can happen is we’ll finish 3rd in our division. (No way in hell are we losing the division to Jokeland)
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 1:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
flesh eating disease???
fader nation is a conquered nation
Jerry Jones is Al Davis with a smile!
by mdierk on Aug 19, 2009 1:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Divaculosis
It is said that ducks crash and die on the blue turf.
by Welcome2Boise on Aug 19, 2009 3:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
cranial rectal inversion :D
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 19, 2009 7:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re:all wrong
I can give you two examples: One…the whole Cutler trade. The front office should have made sure that NE was totally in with the deal for Cassel…because once it was out it would cause issues between the player and the organization if the trade didnt happen. Call the player and inform him or his rep that they will be talking to a team regarding a trade. This would just be the right thing to do and would also open lines of communication if the trade falls threw. Two: BMarsh While i do not believe we should re-work his contract until the end of the year they handled his court outcome all wrong and it was the front office that met with BMarsh and his attorney and Joe Ellis told them that the organization was sorry for the PR’s actions and said this person acted on their own. If that was the case why didn’t they fire this low level PR rep…
by NJ Broncos on Aug 19, 2009 1:13 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree and disagree
I agree that the PR department needs to be called to task for the rumored instructions to players.
I disagree regarding the comment about the Cutler trade. I have yet to see any substantive report regarding that affair that says it was anything other than what McDaniels stated: They called, we listened, we said no. At that point, I imagine it became a non-issue for McDaniels. Why stir the pot at that point? From what I saw it was the DP that jumped all over the affair and started characterizing it as “McDaniels shopped Cutler.”
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by BShrout on Aug 19, 2009 1:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, do you really think
that Cutler would have been okay with “being shopped” if McDaniels would have called him? No way, no how.
by adamriggs on Aug 19, 2009 1:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you Kidding?
Cutler got with the coach and told him where to trade him. =)
"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra
"No, I'm from Iowa, I only work in outer space."
by KaptainKirk on Aug 19, 2009 3:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Belichik stated that he wasn't aware of the trade talks until the KC trade had been finalised!
If McD really wanted Cassel so badly, why would he not have called the man who was his boss weeks earlier? As Guru has stated time and time again, the only team who would have turned down the offer was Denver. Tampa Bay (or whoever else called) wanted Cutler and NE would have got much more than they settled for with KC.
by Timimus on Aug 19, 2009 4:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would love to have voted NO
however there is more evidence he has. I mean not being up to speed on the playbook? What else to you do besides getting healthier if you aren’t on the field practicing? You think that Marshall would be handling this better considering he saw the way Jay handled his ordeal. I guess not.
You are so right Guru and when things are going badly you really do learn a lot more about someone. I figured he would step it up when he saw all the new WRs we brought in.
Get healthy, learn the playbook like every NFL player does, and his new contract will come. Simple as that.
GO BRONCOS IN 2009 AND BEYOND!!
2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
by weazel on Aug 19, 2009 1:14 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Marshall for Hester + picks
both hate the guy throwing to them…
broncorat
by broncorat on Aug 19, 2009 1:15 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
We can't help the Bears, they need to suck for us to get a good pick.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 12:56 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Devin Thomas or Malcom Kelly and a 2nd rounder.
Snyder would get a ‘superstar’….Denver would fill the void with promising young talent at WR and another pick. WhoooHooo!!!
by PredominantlyOrange on Aug 19, 2009 1:18 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Or...
….Thomas Jones and a pick from NY.
by PredominantlyOrange on Aug 19, 2009 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
NO WAY!!!
Thomas is starting to show signs, but are they a real replacement for Marshall? Not in my book.
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Aug 19, 2009 1:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt...
…even with the wildest luck, that BM will ever bring fair-market value.
by PredominantlyOrange on Aug 19, 2009 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably true..
and yes, dealing with danny and raping him of picks and players isn’t terribly hard to do, but i’m not sold on Malcom in the Middle Kelly….
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Aug 19, 2009 2:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jets player
The player I saw that would interest me is Gholston
"Sanity is the realization that everyone is insane to some degree." Me
by 3nS on Aug 19, 2009 1:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still not sold on the idea that Baltimore is out of the picture.
Anyone else have that hunch?
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 1:20 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
yup
We gotta get nastier on D!!!!!!!!!
by Broncofan on Aug 19, 2009 1:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
i've thought that too
they just paid foxy big cash, and they have lots of injuries across a suspect group of wr’s.
by dr.mort on Aug 19, 2009 1:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention Mason could still retire.
Not to pin the Favre card on him, but he could still bail on them. Then they are really in deep water.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 1:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Brandon wants a new contract, then he should LEARN THE PLAYBOOK.
This guy is a huge distraction. He thinks that the Broncos actually need him, but he forgot that we already have Eddie Royal et co. I wonder if Brandon even thinks about the consequences of his actions? Just look at what he’s done in terms of the law.
"When you put on that jersey, the name on the front is more important than the name on the back." - "Miracle".
"Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else." - Vince Lombardi.
by broncoholic on Aug 19, 2009 1:20 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
re:all wrong
McD is pulling all the strings….why do you thing we got smith from NE. A move that I hope will help the team but if he was any good he would be able to hold his roster spot. They have two rookies that never took a snap in the NFL and they are beating him out in training camp. I like McD and i understand that a HC and the GM work together to put together a roster but with the lack of experience they sometimes jump the gun on some deals….
by NJ Broncos on Aug 19, 2009 1:23 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
bad way to look at Smith
High draft pick rookies will usually take spots from solid backups if they show promise. Smith was caught between a rock (the starting 3) and a hard place (rookies with promise and bigger contracts). He had some decent stats last year as a backup and should improve (what is he, 4th year? third?). Whatever way you look at it, he’s not been brought in as the saving grace of the defensive line, but rather as more competition to improve the level of play on all squads (first and second team).
by BroncosBassist on Aug 19, 2009 1:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Smith was said to have been
somewhere between 5th and 7th on the NE depth chart, so he was part of the basic rotation in a very deep defensive line. Given that we don’t have nearly as much defensive line talent as NE he’ll probably push for a starting spot here.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Aug 19, 2009 1:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Smith is 4th year
He was drafted in 2006. I don’t know I he’ll start (he might), but he’s talented and can also help on ST, an era that needs a lot of help. Good 5 technique DEs don’t come along all the time – he was a good pickup
Hillis/Moreno in '09
by Emmett Smith on Aug 19, 2009 2:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would also like to ask.................
Brandon if he really meant it when during the Cutler fiasco he said that Mr. Bowlen and Coach McD have the rings so I will trail along with them. Apparently that was lip service.
We gotta get nastier on D!!!!!!!!!
by Broncofan on Aug 19, 2009 1:24 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I'd say trade him and a 2nd rounder to Arizona for Anquan Bolden
Give Bolden his extension and be stacked at WR
by CombatChuk on Aug 19, 2009 1:28 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
This is a Michael - Fredo Situation
Denver is dead to Brandon. Reading between the lines of this whole ordeal, it’s pretty clear to me at this point that Marshall just wants out of Denver at any cost. He’s had a rough go of things while living in Denver— the majority of his arrests have been while he was a Bronco, the McDonald’s bag incident, and most importantly, his involvement in DWill’s death. Throw all this together and add an entitled fanbase, a below market contract, losing the coach that always had his back, and the QB that helped make him a star, and you can see why he “hates Denver”.
I realize most of the arrests and the fall were outside of Denver and the Cutler and Shanny situations were after his “I hate Denver” comment, but Denver is where he had to come to be held accountable for all his transgressions. I could see him saying, “great, now I have to back and deal with Woody f’n Page”. By far the biggest issue here is the Darrent William’s murder. I’m not saying that he was responsible for the Murder in any way, I’m just saying that it has had to have a huge affect on his life and his perception of Denver. I think we as fans underestimate how big of an effect that event had on the organization. Every other player that was there that night is gone.
Brandon wants out of Denver. Sure, money has a lot to do with it, but these other factors play a huge role too. I think these other reasons are why Pat Bowlen told him he would try to accommodate a trade— especially the DWill angle. I’m not saying Brandon’s right for wanting out for these reasons. I’m just looking at the situation (especially Bowlen’s willingness to trade him and Marshall’s “I hate Denver comment”) and trying to read between the lines.
The best case scenario is a trade before the season starts. Now that his court proceedings are behind him, I think enough teams will be interested to creat decent value. I don’t think it’s out of the picture to get a starting receiver second round pick, or a reciever project (Devin Thomas) and a first round pick. I would take either.
by ButteBronco on Aug 19, 2009 1:29 PM MDT reply actions 2 recs
It's pretty clear that he had a part in that New Year's Night
Javon Walker had to get outta town to clear his head too. But a move to Oakland hasn’t seemed to flip the script too much.
The truth is, trouble follows you more than you follow trouble.
by dr.mort on Aug 19, 2009 1:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why don't we send him to Dallas, he'd be a second coming of T.O.
"When you put on that jersey, the name on the front is more important than the name on the back." - "Miracle".
"Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else." - Vince Lombardi.
by broncoholic on Aug 19, 2009 1:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
He had a part in the NYE tragedy for sure,
I just didn’t want to sound like I was blaming DWill’s death on him.
Trouble may follow him, but the point I was making was that this guy seems to want out of Denver period.
by ButteBronco on Aug 19, 2009 2:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a very good point.
Brandon wants out of Denver because he can’t get away from his past here. He is in denial. He thinks because he wasn’t found guilty it proves he’s a good guy. He just won’t admit he’s done anything wrong. He contributed to the death of another player, but no remorse. What has he got, 14 arrests? He wants to go someplace else so he can smile and pretend he’s a charming little boy that everyone loves. Too much reality for Brandon in Denver.
by MichaelCushman on Aug 19, 2009 9:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why should we trade for another WR, when the depth at that position is off the charts.
Why don’t we trade for a D-lineman??? I don’t want draft picks b/c the only pick I would take is a #1, but two #1’s in one year is hard to deal with…Knowshon and Ayers.
"When you put on that jersey, the name on the front is more important than the name on the back." - "Miracle".
"Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else." - Vince Lombardi.
by broncoholic on Aug 19, 2009 1:30 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
McKinely looks promising (needs more development), Royal is stellar, Stokely is getting old, Gaffney didn't look good
Having another stud WR will do wonders for us
by CombatChuk on Aug 19, 2009 1:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
2 number 1's
puts us right back in the situation we were in this year. Which by the way isn’t a good one. 4 number 1’s in 2 years is a LOT of money.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 1:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what I'm getting at. It's like having Peyton Manning and Tom Brady on the same team.
"When you put on that jersey, the name on the front is more important than the name on the back." - "Miracle".
"Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else." - Vince Lombardi.
by broncoholic on Aug 19, 2009 1:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
except neither one of them are proven at all....
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 19, 2009 1:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Off the charts?
We have an OK set of WRs without BM but it’s nowhere close to being off the charts. Might even be bottom half of the league, actually.
by creamy on Aug 19, 2009 2:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trade him to the Jets for Britt Davis and a 2nd 2010
Britt Davis | #17 | WR
New York Jets | Official Team Site
Height: 6-3 Weight: 205 Age: 22
Born: 8/23/1986
College: Northern Illinois
Experience: Rookie
High School:
by bfree2bronc on Aug 19, 2009 1:47 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand how you could think Brandon knows the plays
He wasn’t here during the offseason and has only been on the field for a couple of practices in preseason. The only way to know the plays as a WR in an offensive system this complex is to be on the field doing them. It’s one thing to look at diagrams in a lengthy playbook. It’s another to be out there repping them. I never understood why people thought he would just show up after trial and run out as a contributing starter. This is a VERY complex offense and he skipeed the entire offseason. This is not a surprise.
by Broncos_FTW on Aug 19, 2009 1:47 PM MDT reply actions 3 recs
+1 and rec'd
" Life is what happens while you're making other plans "
by hairybear on Aug 19, 2009 2:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You forgot the rec.. lol
Meh, i’ll do it for you.. :-)
by HorseStance on Aug 19, 2009 3:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps
Instead of showing how well he could dunk a basketball following his hip surgery, he should have been on a field – ANY FIELD – running through the playbook he should have also been studying.
"The first step to penetration... must not be lateral"
-Confucius
by ArrowSpread on Aug 19, 2009 10:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not surprised he is way behind either,
but I just don’t buy that he couldn’t have gained anything from the playbook without being on the field. He needs to understand not just his responsibility, but also the whole offense’s. Heck, he also needs to know what a defense will most likely do when they see the physical manifestation of the diagrams. Which explains why McDaniels has had the offense line up as defense during camp. Marshall just had to go through that too.
I don’t get the impression that McD is trying to punish Marshall, as much as requiring he catch up. I wouldn’t want him taking reps from a starter if he doesn’t know the roll of a starter.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 1:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trade him to Seattle for our 2010 1st round pick
Then the Cutler trade will come full circle
by CombatChuk on Aug 19, 2009 1:48 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
now that's funny! LOL
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Aug 19, 2009 1:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Denver Broncos trade Marshall for their own #1 pick.
now that would be a bombshell.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 1:24 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
CBA
The reason the FO holds the trump cards is that after the season:
If no CBA renegotiated, Marshall will be a restricted FA meaning he can be tendered for a first and a third. That’s his value – unless they could get that now…
If not, the franchise tag would allow another FO trade like Cassell.
by dr.mort on Aug 19, 2009 1:51 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Inside knowledge
I wonder if we should take Bowlen’s position on this whole situation as a hint that the CBA will expire.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 1:27 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trade
Have you ever stared at a hypnotist’s wheel. Sucks you right in until you’re sound asleep. The whole BMarsh saga today feels like being hypnotized and got me thinking.
What exactly are we lacking for the team’s NEEDS and how best could we leverage any potential BMarsh trade?
- Do we need a #1 WR if we trade Marshall?
- What other needs could we fill and what are they?
Marshall is a big-body WR. We don’t have another like him on the roster unless we converted Scheffler. What other somotype WR’s are available? Maybe Boldin from Arizona? Maybe Braylon Edwards from Cleveland? Do we really need a #1? Royal is certainly great but not the big body weakside WR like Marshall. Maybe a promising rookie WR plus picks?
I don’t think the team has any GLARING needs right now. Areas of weakness, yes, but nothing glaring. What other needs could we address?
- QB – I’m completely happy with Orton. Would I rather have Manning, Brees, a few others? It could happen. But I’m in no rush.
- D – I’m still concerned about our Dline. We could also use depth in our secondary.
- ST – We could probably use better kickers.
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 1:56 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
huh?
Getting Manning or Brees is not a possibility… :)
I agree…d line help is always nice…but what team (outside the NY Giants have enough depth to give up real talent)? I’d argue the only team that appeals to me is the Giants… They’re backup D-line is better than 75% of the league.
kicker???
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Aug 19, 2009 2:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just some topics
I’m just asking what the team needs and whether we could meet those needs by trading BMarsh.
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 2:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
i would say
defensive line help…
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Aug 19, 2009 3:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like this line of thinking Endzone
I just got back from rehab and I find this mess. I stated earlier this morning, that we should just cut Marshall and I stand by it. If we were to trade him, I think we should try to upgrade our LB corps. Yes it would be lovely to get Boldin, but I think we will be fine. You watch, McDaniels has been prepared for this for quite awhile. Why else do we have so much depth at the WR position?
"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra
"No, I'm from Iowa, I only work in outer space."
by KaptainKirk on Aug 19, 2009 3:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LB's & WR's
I was disappointed with Fox & Barrett last Friday, so I’m thinking we could upgrade there. My only concern is that BMarsh is a “big-body” WR. I was also impressed with Fields and Baker at NT, but not as much with our DE’s. We are also a little weak on our SOLB spot, IMO.
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 3:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I must be the only guy in Cyberspace
That thinks we are going to see him starting for the Broncos week 1 and signed to an extension sometime after.
…Unless the Jets are going to go loco.
Smokey, my friend, you are entering a world of pain.
by TJ Johnson on Aug 19, 2009 1:59 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Yeah…I’m kinda there with you.
Follow the Arizona and Cincinnati playbook for dealing with ‘disgruntled’ WRs.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Aug 19, 2009 2:06 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
You are not alone
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 1:28 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope we fire the Jr. staff idiot that when rogue to tell the players what to say and not to say without first discussing the matter with The Coach.
Love the Broncos, don't like their Coach.
by McGeorge on Aug 19, 2009 2:10 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
McG...
I have been there. Not everything goes through the coach. While I find it high.y unlikely that a Jr. staffer would do this on their own, the PR staff does not go through the HC. It if indeed come from above, it was above McDaniels as well….
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Aug 19, 2009 2:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
McG
Just wanted another opportunity to express his distate for McDaniels (note that he always refers to McD as “The Coach” in capital letters as if to say that McD thinks he’s god). It’s just so tiresome.
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 2:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
He expressed distaste for the Jr. staff member, not The Coach
Granted McGeorge has expressed many unpopular views (especially to enjoyers of Kool-Aid) some of which appeared to be only to cause unrest, this comment isn’t one of them. I for one like the differing opinion he has to offer (most of the time), and didn’t think he deserved any backlash for this one. Your own distaste for McG may rival his for McD.
No offense meant, BTW, Endzone. To each his own (differing opinions and all).
by Royal With Cheese on Aug 19, 2009 2:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
As John Noted
John noted that McG was indirectly saying that McD was responsible.
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 3:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No I was not.
Love the Broncos, don't like their Coach.
by McGeorge on Aug 19, 2009 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think...With all due respect to McG
He is actually mocking McD using the “The Player” expression during the Cutler saga…It is classic McG though…He even got me to use the term on occasion, although not for the same reasons…
by BroncoSense72 on Aug 19, 2009 3:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correct.
Kill them with their own poison.
Love the Broncos, don't like their Coach.
by McGeorge on Aug 19, 2009 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think the directive came from The Coach. I really do think some rouge Jr. idiot was trying to make a name for himself. It was a stupid stupid stupid thing to do and it gave BM some (very small but unnecessary) leverage.
In the case of BM, I find no fault in The Coach. None. This mess is all on BM, a Jr. Staff moron and our crappy medical staff that can’t diagnose diabetes, major hip injuries, dozens of hamstring injuries and mass weight loss. But mostly BM.
And if you are tired of me calling The Coach, The Coach. I can assure you I am beyond tired of you guys rationalizing every freaking thing The Coach has done, Orton’s play, the Cutler fiasco, Bowlen’s behavior, etc..
Love the Broncos, don't like their Coach.
by McGeorge on Aug 19, 2009 3:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You mean the Cutler fiasco in which Cutler asked to be traded BEFORE McDaniels arrival?
Bowlen’s behavior? Could you please elaborate?
I am tired of your continual “rationalization” of what you perceive was wrong. Sorry to say McG . . . you are in the minority. Get used to it!
"The men who have done big things are those who are not afraid to attempt big things, who were not afraid to risk failure in order to gain success."
- B.C Forbes
by HSFBCoach on Aug 19, 2009 9:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, Guru
I find it doubtful that a junior staffer would take it upon himself to take that kind of action. It probably came from the front office, in my opinion. Regardless, somebody’s tail should be in a sling over this stupid move.
" Life is what happens while you're making other plans "
by hairybear on Aug 19, 2009 3:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think so. Obviously domestic violence is an extremely touchy issue and I think the Broncos didn’t want any of their players saying something that was going to be misinterpreted or seen as an insensitive. I don’t think it had anything to do with their thoughts on Marshall or was intended to be a personal jab at Marshall.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Aug 19, 2009 3:11 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
-1. These are grown men. Treat them as such. They don’t need a muzzle.
Love the Broncos, don't like their Coach.
by McGeorge on Aug 19, 2009 3:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Grown men say incredibly stupid things regularly,
that is why PR departments exist.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 1:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't agree
The advised approach was the wise one- there was two sides to the very contentious story. PR is all about not angering anyone. It’d look very shabby to appear gleeful for one side.
Obviously the execution of the plan was suspect, but Marshall’s objections show how clueless he continues to be in the PR department.
by AllBroncsallday on Aug 19, 2009 3:39 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'm with AllBroncsallday
It would look shabby indeed. The infamous PR instructions have nothing to do with not “supporting” Marshall — fair or not, it’s certainly true that players expressing unreserved happiness about the outcome would read as being glad that he “got off.” Assuming that the other Broncos would never mean such a thing, it’s a shame that they didn’t get the chance to say so to the press, but … I guess that’s just life in world where what you mean isn’t always what gets heard. (Especially for celebrities whose words might get broadcast around the country within the hour.) Alas.
Anyway, either Marshall is actually really hurt that the team restricted his teammates from expressing their great joy to the press or this is just another occasion for him to express whatever dissatisfaction he’s had with the team for a while.
Or to put it another way, I’d think about this episode differently if it was coming from a player who hadn’t already asked to be traded.
by GordonPym on Aug 19, 2009 4:35 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Excessive Celebrations
Just like on the field, off-field celebrations should not be excessive. I think BMarsh was expecting to repeat his touchdown glove celebration that Stokely rushed in to prevent.
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 4:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just pictured someone throwing a flag during a press conference
“excessive celebration! Assess 15 yards at the kickoff!”
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Aug 19, 2009 8:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's always easy to blame the "rogue staffer" or "bad apple" (see: Lynndie England)...
it probably wasn’t from McD, but I’ll bet some on on the PR staff (maybe Saccomano himself) came up with the strategy. As speculated elsewhere on MHR, it’s probably a case of the PR staff looking at the problem from a pure PR perspective (not wanting to upset any women’s group, etc.) and not from a personnel perspective (pissing BMarsh off even more).
by ButteBronco on Aug 19, 2009 2:30 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
There's nothing new about the concept
of getting the people in your organization together to give a unified message to the press. A lot of people (me included) wouldn’t know what the hell to say about a sensitive subject if a microphone was thrust in their face. There’s nothing wrong with giving people some guidance on the matter. It doesn’t take much to twist that guidance into something nefarious, if your mind was already there.
by ShawnDenver on Aug 19, 2009 5:37 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
i'm biting my tongue
i kinda think i know why the FO didnt want celebrations
MHR...and proud of it!
by MHRsGirl on Aug 19, 2009 8:58 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
BM
BM hits women, but he can’t trust the Broncos! Whats wrong with this picture?
by Tech_man on Aug 19, 2009 2:16 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Marshall for Urlacher
Let them reunite….just kidding, sort of.
by phondonkey on Aug 19, 2009 2:20 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Trade Marshall for Tommy Harris
Love the Broncos, don't like their Coach.
by McGeorge on Aug 19, 2009 3:51 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know your joking, but the Bears must suck for us to get the best pick possible
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 1:39 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
another thought
in my earlier posts in wanting to trade marshall…. haven’t come across the many ideas of who to trade for. i would only trade him to nfc, liked the idea to giants if we can get some of their def. line or the rams. don’t know what the rams have in exchange.
by golfdoc on Aug 19, 2009 2:26 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
We may be overreacting a bit here:
From the Marshall interview:
“I’m still here and I’m a Bronco. All I can do now is try to get into the best football shape and go from there…all I can do is show up at Dove Valley everyday and try to do my best”
When asked if he would sign a contract extension he replied, “I’m here now and I love playing football…it’s what makes me happy…and I love what I do”.
When asked if he’s still hoping for a contract extension, “I think that’s what all players want”
These may not be word for word…but it’s the gist of what he said.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Aug 19, 2009 2:37 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I just heard the whole press event on 104.3...
and I didn’t think it sounded that bad. McDanials also downplayed it pretty well.
by ButteBronco on Aug 19, 2009 2:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well that is reassuring
but nonetheless – it’s hard to believe he doesn’t understand the reasonings behind not wanting teammates to go all ‘public’(ly happy) about his trial
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 19, 2009 3:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
His body language says it all...
he’s not happy and is begrudgingly doing his job right now…
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Aug 19, 2009 3:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just watched the interview on db.com
And I have to say, this is not what the media says it is. I was watching Marshall’s face the whole time, and he seemed to get annoyed at the media constantly trying to prod him into saying something negative. The things he said did not in any way make it sound like he is quitting, he never said a “breaking point is near” as the headline at DP suggests.
He seems to have had his feelings hurt by the PR incident and is smarting about it still (understandable) but he also seemed to actually be trying to put stuff behind him and actually defended McDaniel’s and the whole 2nd team/scout team thing.
He can exasperate me at times, but this time I don’t see any fire, Just the media with a commercial grade smoke machine.
It is said that ducks crash and die on the blue turf.
by Welcome2Boise on Aug 19, 2009 3:03 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Thanks for your Insight
WATCH THE DB.COM VIDEO AND MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND
To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also DREAM; not only plan, but also BELIEVE.
by Broncobh on Aug 19, 2009 3:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Watched and...
came away with the feeling that he’s not happy….he’s giving Cutler-like answers….i really like BMARSH on the field, but he’s wearing on me… just get out on the field and play…
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Aug 19, 2009 3:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what he is doing (until the next 'hammie')
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 1:42 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait...
Are you saying the drama-lovin’ media is intentionally overplaying a story to create the drama they crave?
Say it ain’t so!! ;)
by AllBroncsallday on Aug 19, 2009 3:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
poll results
are sad. i wish there was a “i hope not” vote. …… i still picked yes
by 3rdegree on Aug 19, 2009 3:05 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
MSI reposted
a trade sending Marshall to KC in exchange for Croyle and a second is in the works.. Of coarse this is a pile of crap and even AP homers laughed at it
Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.
by 808NaNz808 on Aug 19, 2009 3:08 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe I'm missing something here . . .
but isn’t BMarch entering the last year of his contract?
As a 4th round pick 3 years ago, I think he’s entering the 4th and final year of his rookie contract. Historically, that’s when the Broncos will redo a guy’s contract (i.e., TD, A. Wilson, etc.). Given that he has (clearly) outplayed his first deal, and he obviously has all the talent in the world, why wouldn’t we extend him? And for those of you playing, the answer CANNOT be because he’s had off field issues, because that can and would be easily provided for in the contract.
Basically, this is as confusing to me as almost anything else that’s happened this offseason. We actually managed to draft an absolute STUD at WR, one who makes the QB, #19, Hillis, and any other RB better just by his presence on the field. We, as a team, are significantly less without him. These are the types of players that do not grow on trees and they almost never come without some sort of issues. At least BMarch has a personality, is liked by his teammates, plays hurt, competes for every ball, and will block.
Why in the world would we not extend him?
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 19, 2009 3:17 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
He is astonishingly underpaid.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Aug 19, 2009 3:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Assuming you're not being sarcastic,
and given the economics of the NFL, I completely agree.
Money would solve this and it should be spent giving BMarsh a Roddy White type contract (with appropriate safeguards in place in case he is attached by another flat screen, etc).
He is NOT a player that we should let slip away.
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 19, 2009 3:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not being sarcastic at all. What are other back to back 100+ reception WRs in the league getting paid?
I tend to agree with you…this is not a guy that we can let get away. It seems like this whole thing would be resolved by an extension and I think we should just roll the dice and get it done.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Aug 19, 2009 3:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok
I’ve found you can never be too careful around here, especially when one is not 100% in agreement with management decisions! ;)
Here’s hoping he’s still with us (both physically and mentally) this season and beyond!
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 19, 2009 3:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why Not Extend Him?
Simple…7 Arrests in the last 3 years to go along with a serious arm and leg injury. Does his play deserve a raise? Yes. I feel he needs to prove he can stay healthy on the field, and clean off of it.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Aug 19, 2009 6:17 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
great point...
only so many times you can hear……I swear I’m gonna change…this will be the last time…..Ive learned my lesson the hard way………….etc…etc……….etc……….
Correct me if I’m wrong (2004 arrest for assaulting a police officer, failure to obey, resisting arrest) but wasn’t is some of these issues that dropped him to the fourth round in the draft……..which constituted the contract he is playing out now……sure he proved he could provide the numbers on the field….but never made good on his word about his continuous off field antics….
I guess the real question for the Broncos is which out weighs the other??? The ability to believe that Marshall will make good on his word THIS TIME….and risk signing a player that could easily miss 8 weeks with yet another run in with the law….yet have a talented WR on the field….
Or cut ties with someone that hasn’t proven that he can stay out of trouble for the last 5 years? Not many second chances, third chances, fourth or even seventh chances left!
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 19, 2009 8:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, then we disagree
I think he’s proven his worth on the field (and then some). I don’t believe his skill set will be easily replaced and I don’t think we’d ever get fair value in return.
Does he have warts? Yes. Is he the most talened WR to wear a Bronco uniform in the last 25 years? I’d say without a doubt. Are we better off without him? Absolutely not.
We can make him play out his last year and then see how it goes. Maybe his value decreases. Maybe it increases. Maybe it stays the same. The point is that I don’t like the mentality that we as an organization don’t or won’t take care of home grown talent.
I guess I just fear watching talent walk out the door because I know how hard it is to find a WR like that.
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 19, 2009 8:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair Enough...
To call on and off field risk “warts” is belittling it don’t you think?
Last 25 years? I’d take Rod in his prime over Marshall, and I’ll tell you waht, while he doesn’t have Marshall’s size, Eddie Royal is well on his way and he has already proven he doesn’t need Marshall on the field to make a huge impact(Oakland last year).
I would love to see Marshall hang around, but to blindly give him $50 million without taking the risks into account isn’t smart business….
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Aug 19, 2009 9:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
At this point we're just arguing, be here goes
You would take Rod Smith over Marshall on talent? Really?! I agree that Rod was the perfect WR for us, uber productive, hard working, clutch and (mainly) kept his nose clean (remember the charges for domestic violence against his common-law wife back in 2000?). But from a talent standpoint there is (again, IMO) no argument.
As for #19, I also am a big fan. That said, I think claiming he has “proven” he can be a #1 based on the results of the first game of his professional played against a floundering franchise while matchup with the a CB that didn’t even make it though the season with that team, much less starting, is a bit of a stretch.
Bottom line is that we’re basically in agreement: BMarch is a great talent, one that will not easily be replaced, but I agree we can’t give him the “keys to the Kingdom” without some serious safeguards in place to protect us in the event he has further legal and League issues. If he won’t (or, because of the collective barging agreement, can’t) accept a contract that provides such reasonable safeguards, then I too would support moving on. But to pretend that wouldn’t be a BIG loss to us is an exercise in self-deception IMO.
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 20, 2009 6:19 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
talent is only part of the equation..
With that mentality…you could argue that Maurice Clarett was a good draft choice….with similar behavioral problems.. …with the same promises about his off field antics…….Ae what point is it good to tarnish the intergrity of the Broncos Organization to put talent on the field?? To me that leads to a very slippery slope….one hard to recover from….one that Shanahan started, and that we are trying to pull out of right now! Talent isn’t the only thing goes into being a member of the NFL! Athletes today are among the biggest Role Models for our youth!!! Who would you rather your son act like??? Steve Watson….or Brandon Marshall?
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 19, 2009 9:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Come on
If my son ends up like BMarch, that’s on me not him. I’m his father and his upbringing is my responsibility.
I think its sad if you really believe that athletes are really the biggest “Role Models of our youth”.
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 20, 2009 6:26 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL...
I guess we will disagree on this point too….
Every time I picked up a football, baseball, basketball, hockey stick…I always imagined my self as one of my heros….sorry but IT IS a fact of life!! Whether you want to admit it or not…Pro Athletes ARE today’s bigest role models, with the multi-million dollar contracts, what kid isnt lured into the prospect of being a pro athlete, or emulating their heros?
To think that Pro Athletes don’t have an effect on the youth, is just plain naive…
Two prime examples……BE LIKE MIKE!!!! BO KNOWS!!! I could go on and on about the marketing of professional athletes as Role Models!!
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 20, 2009 11:10 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
A couple thoughts
It IS hard to find a WR with Brandon’s combination of skills. It is not at all hard to find a WR who plays great on the field. And— especially in a system like NE’s that won 2 SBs without anyone of BM-caliber at WR— that’s all we really need.
Here’s my bottom line: would I rather have two Eddie Royal-type players at WR, or Eddie Royal and Brandon Marshall— warts and all? I don’t have to think about that for any length of time: give me two of #19. But then again, I’ve never been even a little prone to the Al Davis fallacy that falls in love with size/speed/strength to the neglect of all else.
"3rd and 6, Elway shotgun... Elway, scrambling, looking, running-- DIVING!!!-- inside the 5 yard line for a first down! Is he only 37?! How important is this football game? How bad does John Elway want to win this football game? Where you see the quarterbacks go down: Not Elway!"
by Sharpe as a Tack on Aug 19, 2009 9:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
There's a bigger picture here that you seem to want to ignore.
It’s not enough to put up good individual numbers at the expense of team chemistry. It’s definitely not enough to put up good numbers at the expense of violence against women no matter how justified at first look. While innocent in the court, how many of us at MHR have been in trial for domestic assault? You can’t even put yourself in that situation as a public figure. To raise the issue of valuable you are in football no matter how despicable a human being just doesn’t work for me. i have heard all the arguments about M. Vick, but will never accept that he can come back to the NFL just because “he’s paid for his crimes.” Many times bad judgment alters a person’s life forever as part of the accounability for aberrant behavior. That’s just the way it is in real life.
Imagination is more important than knowledge. A. Einstein
by Ponderosa on Aug 19, 2009 9:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
How soon we forget
In 2000, Rod Smith was charged with domestic violence against his common law wife. Instead of being acquitted, he pled guilty to a lesser charge of verbal harassment and went though anger management classes.
Was he a “despicable human being”?
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 20, 2009 6:22 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
one time....
he only had to say…it wont happen again….one time!!! BIG DIFFERENCE!!!
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 20, 2009 11:15 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
there wasn't a string...
if 17 arrests that follwed LMAO!
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 20, 2009 11:16 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
One more reason not to extend him (yet):
He hasn’t even shown that he can crack the starting lineup yet.
That’s not to say he won’t, he almost certainly will. But this is an opportunity for the Broncos to say to him and the rest of the team, ‘The Broncos pay for players that work to help them win games,’ rather than, ‘The Broncos will pay any player who has put up big numbers, regardless of what they will do for the Broncos this year.’
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 2:04 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
But the team can make him a restricted FA next year.
Who are you saying we drafted as a stud WR this offseasn?
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 3:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
NO
From a personnel perspective you don’t play games like that (wait until he’s a restricted FA and then see what happens), not with a player of that caliber. Bad move from BMarsh’s perspective and frankly a worse move from a league player’s perspective (“they don’t take care of their guys in Denver”). Either he’s worth extending or he’s not. If he is (and let’s be clear, he definitely IS), get it done, treat him like a man and they type of player he clearly is, and demand that he live up to that level. Make him a partner and an ally in the new direction of the franchise, not an outsider.
As for the drafting WR issue, I meant that we drafted BMarsh, not someone else this last April.
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 19, 2009 3:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
I thought you were asking if BMarsh was entering the last year of his contract. Yes, he is. But the team controls his services this year and next.
As far as the league players. It is a two-way street. If the player takes care of the team, the team takes care of the player. Right now, BMarsh is making himself the outsider, not the other way around.
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 4:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I agree that the Broncos hold all the cards for this year and some of the cards next year, but I disagree that using that control is a wise short or long-term strategy in the present case.
Of course it all comes down to numbers (production and $$$), but assuming BMarch wants Roddy White numbers, and would accept certain reasonable protections re off-field issues, I think it would be in the interest of both parties (and certainly in our interest as fans!) to find some common ground and move forward together.
But then again, I’m an M&A attorney, not a litigator, so I tend to approach most situations looking for a win-win (orange-colored glasses, if you will).
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 19, 2009 4:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
M&A
OK. You look at two companies. One produces a quantifiable product with an outstanding market share and good management. The other produces an unknown product with poor market share and poor management. Which is worth more? I think we are on the same page. Marshall needs to produce this year (quantifiable product). That in turn will increase his market share (other teams will want him). The biggest problem is his self management (e.g. not learning the playbook, diva personality, etc.) coupled with some hard asset failures (hip surgery and leg injury).
I don’t think the Broncos can get as much value right now for him as either they or BMarsh believe he is worth. BMarsh needs to demonstrate his value on and off the field.
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 4:59 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I get what you're saying
But that’s not the same thing.
We’ll just have to agree to disagree.
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 19, 2009 8:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't remeber where or when i saw it but i was under the impression that..
.. a restructured deal was offered too him but was heavily “conditioned” and not the money he wanted… i could just have made this up thought.. not too sure.
by HorseStance on Aug 19, 2009 3:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
"And for those of you playing, the answer CANNOT be because he’s had off field issues, because that can and would be easily provided for in the contract."
So your question is, “bracketing the number one reason you’re hesitant to give Marshall a new contract, why on earth don’t you give Marshall a new contract?”
Is that right?
For those of you who aren’t paying attention, evidently Jamie Dukes was correct: this story is a BOMBSHELL, at least on ESPN and talk radio, where McDaniels is again being hammered.
From now on, every time a guy is acquitted for beating his girlfriend because she was crass enough to demand hush money, teams should be counseled to throw parties.
Bring on the ho’s!
by JeffG on Aug 19, 2009 3:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
as a follow up...
…I’d like to add that I’m embarrassed these days to be counted among the majority of Broncos fans. Such as they are.
by JeffG on Aug 19, 2009 3:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
I don’t have any idea what you’re talking about/asking. That’s not a slam against you at all. I’ve reread your message about 5 times and I really don’t get it.
Are you saying that the fact he was accused and acquitted of battery against his girlfriend is a legitimate reason to not resign him? If so, I simply cannot agree. Nor, I’m sure, would 31 other NFL teams.
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 19, 2009 4:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's really not that difficult to understand.
The Broncos know that Marshall is not blameless, acquittal or not. They know that he’s one incident away from an 8-game suspension.
In case you haven’t heard, this wasn’t a one time thing. And a new incident with his new fiancee raises all sorts of flags, even though the charges were dropped.
You may be willing to forget all that. But then, it ain’t your $50 million that’s on the line.
by JeffG on Aug 19, 2009 4:12 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
As I said before
contracts can be, and routinely are, structured to protect the team in case of additional off the field issues cropping up. Given that the team’s financial protection is a given, resigning him is (IMO) a complete no-brainer.
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 19, 2009 4:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately This Isn't True
Under the bargaining agreement the morals clause can’t recapture that much of the cost.
From Klis’ Article:
Let’s use Roddy White as an example, as Marshall probably is. During his trip to Atlanta last week, Marshall spoke with White, the Atlanta Falcons’ top receiver who recently received a six-year extension with an $18.6 million guarantee.
White recorded a combined 2,584 yards and 13 touchdowns the past two years while in that same period Marshall had 2,590 yards and 13 touchdowns.
If the Broncos gave Marshall a similar $18.6 million guarantee, they could use the morals clause to recover only $775,000 (25 percent of the prorated bonus in the particular year of his suspension).
Tis better not to throw it to the deep receiver but the open receiver.
by Kfustud on Aug 19, 2009 4:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I read that article too but
unless there is something in the collective bargaining agreement that prevents clawbacks (maybe there is, unfortunately I don’t work for an NFL team and therefore don’t know for sure), nothing would prevent a team from adding specific language that says something to the effect of “suspension = payback of bonus/salary for time missed”.
So to anyone out there reading this, IS there something that prevents a team from structuring their own contract in this way?
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 19, 2009 4:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well I don't Work There Either
But I think that is the point of the statement. Arguing that moral clauses must be limited otherwise there is no reason to say it could recoup more.
Tis better not to throw it to the deep receiver but the open receiver.
by Kfustud on Aug 19, 2009 4:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
“couldn’t”
Tis better not to throw it to the deep receiver but the open receiver.
by Kfustud on Aug 19, 2009 4:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Collective Bargaining Agreement
See this link
by Endzone on Aug 19, 2009 5:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
300+ Pages!
Do you know what my billable rate is?!?!? :)
I’m sure the answer is in there somewhere but I’ll just wait until the Cliff’s Notes come out . . .
by Elway's Ghost on Aug 19, 2009 8:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
just out of curiosity, what is your billable rate?
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 2:05 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think it's that simple
To work conditions into a contract for off-the-field issues.
Seems to me there’d be all kinds of legal aspects of that which would not get approved by the NFLPA or Marshall’s agent(s).
by ShawnDenver on Aug 19, 2009 5:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's obvious...
Mathematically you have to look at this off season and check out the variables versus the control in the situation with Cutler and Marshall:
Variables: Unhappy Denver Players wanting to leave
Control (or constant presence this summer): Denver, Josh McDaniels and Pat Bowlen
Denver (McD + Bowlen) = Good Players leaving
Case Closed!
by chiefs_55 on Aug 19, 2009 3:18 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
good math
"Have you ever heard of the emancipation proclamation?"
- "I don't listen to hip-hop"
"Born like this / Into this"
by BroncoJoe311 on Aug 19, 2009 3:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's your case?
Either my mathematics are rusty, but I don’t see your point.
by adamriggs on Aug 19, 2009 3:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
or
Variables: B Marsh wanting a new contract or team
control: Deciding to forego working with team, or working much at all, and complaining alot
result: no new contract, no reasonable trade offers
‘math’ can prove anything
"My job description is to win football games. I'm a hard worker. I'm not flashy by any means, but my job is to play football and win and I plan to do that." Kyle Orton
by odarol on Aug 19, 2009 3:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
There are no variables in your equasion
(Control) = (some value) isn’t math
by Royal With Cheese on Aug 19, 2009 3:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unhappy Denver Players wanting to leave:
2 (out of 80 or so)
Not sure what your case was, but yeah, I’d say it’s closed. ;-)
by ShawnDenver on Aug 19, 2009 5:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
McDaniels Presser from NFL.com
McDaniels is not about to reward Marshall for being behind in his preparation. After getting some first-team reps Tuesday, Marshall was relegated to scout-team duties Wednesday. Even in four-receiver sets, he did not work with the first-team offense.
Still, McDaniels insisted he was not trying to send a message.
“He was out there plenty with the first team [Tuesday],” McDaniels said.
“Everybody takes reps on the scout team. … I’m not going to sit here and narrate the practice for you. Everybody takes turns doing that and that’s where we’re at.
“Everybody needs to do the same thing — practice, do your job. We’re not going to make roster decisions, first-string, second-string right now in the second week of training camp.”
To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also DREAM; not only plan, but also BELIEVE.
by Broncobh on Aug 19, 2009 3:22 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
What is the role of leaders on our team to corral him and say grow up!
With all the leaders this team has someone should get in his grill and say “ManUp! This whining has to stop. Shut up and play the best you can, don’t talk to the media and you’ll get everything you think you deserve but haven’t earned yet. You’ll have the support of your teammates if you work hard and perform. Otherwise we’ll be happy to see you somewhere else wearing out your welcome.”
Imagination is more important than knowledge. A. Einstein
by Ponderosa on Aug 19, 2009 3:43 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
If Rod Smith couldn't sway him
Louis Armstrong had a good quote: “there are some people that if they don’t know, you can’t tell ’em”
by ShawnDenver on Aug 19, 2009 5:43 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Good Worker
I once had an employee that was a good worker. But he always had some kind of family problem or car problem that by themselves were legit. But he would leave me in binds. I didn’t want to fire him because he was a decent guy and a good worker. One day the owner of the company pulled me aside and we discussed what was going on and he finally told me, people don’t change. I said “OK if it happens again I’ll fire him.” The next day he was fired.
Moral of the story is unless a person has a rare epiphany he doesn’t change.
"Sanity is the realization that everyone is insane to some degree." Me
by 3nS on Aug 19, 2009 7:04 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
No matter how legitimate the excuse
sometimes it’s just the person having recurrent issues because it’s their karma. I totally agree 3nS.
Imagination is more important than knowledge. A. Einstein
by Ponderosa on Aug 19, 2009 8:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL...
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 19, 2009 9:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about trading Marshall for Shawn Merriman?
I don’t think trading for a second-stringer or a draft choice would significantly help the team.
Merriman is a former Pro bowler, still young, with injury issues, and from what I’ve heard SD is planning on him being gone next year anyway. They have Jyles Tucker and Larry English to take his place.
The downside is having to face each other twice a year, but I think that would be a good trade.
"Remember, it's only a game."
by robswenson on Aug 19, 2009 3:53 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
no thanks,
between the injury and the ‘roids wearing off,’ the guy is just a big question mark.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 2:10 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
On a more positive note..
McD said more two tight end sets where being used today and i can see that continuing if Marshall decides he can’t get too grips with the PB.
Again i want to reiterate that JMac is building a versatile team that will be able too soak up ‘problem’ players or injuries and change the focus but still be effective.
On the actual Marshall issue, i totally trust McDaniels too do the right thing for the team.. if not good trade comes up uno cinco will sit until he learns the playbook and decides that he should really honor a contract that he himself signed!
It’s honestly not like he is not getting paid at all, he is still getting MILLIONS! An if he seriously wants to play for another team then he should be showing the rest of the NFL that he is intelligent (in being able to learn a complicated playbook), trustworthy (in not getting into any more trouble), healthy (in not having further hip or other serious injury problems) and productive (in being able to thrive and make big plays in this type of offense – which is one that more and more teams in the league will start to draw from because it’s successful!)
by HorseStance on Aug 19, 2009 3:56 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I wrote this recently
It seems like a reasonable time to reconsider it.
For size, Tony Scheffler runs a slightly slower 40 and is learning his route-running ksills, but he’s getting there and he is a very good receiver. Last year he gave us 40 receptions for 645 yards, providing 49 yards per game and a rousing 16.1 average with 28 first downs and 3 TD. Labels (TE vs WR) don’t seem to matter as much with this offense. Dan Graham wants to receive more. The use of Quinn will let us keep a 3 TE set if we wish, and make 2 TE sets common. We also have several good receiving RBs – the only thing that Jordan did in the SF game that I liked was catch a nice pass.
Stokley will be a frequent weapon. Royal is a 1st receiver, in my book. Lloyd has limitations but is a talent with a knack for important circus catches. Jabar Gaffney was part of a lot of big plays last season – which researching the Divining series, I enjoyed watching his work.We have a couple of young guys in Swift and McKinley who show lots of talent and potential.
Folks, teams have won the Super Bowl – like last season, as SWG has pointed out – with less receiving talent. I’d love to see Marshall in a Broncos Uni and doing well, but that’s mostly up to him.We’ve got a nice stable if for any reason he isn’t playing.
Hillis/Moreno in '09
by Emmett Smith on Aug 19, 2009 3:56 PM MDT reply actions 7 recs
hehe.. my point exactly
Only slightly more thorough and well thought out!
We have players that can bring what Brandon can bring.. lets not forget that a lot of teams thought he would be a TE in the NFL.. We have 3 TE’s that can catch the ball and do it well (maybe some of them better than BM – he dropped a lot last season), we are deep at WR and have RB’s who can catch.. We are able to soak up the Loss of BM – but obviously if he stays and decides to jump back aboard the ship then we would be deeper and have even more talent to draw on!
by HorseStance on Aug 19, 2009 4:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meh.
The fan base here would have a cow.
Frankly, I’m about done with ‘em. The idea that it is somehow nefarious for a PR guy to teach players how best to negotiate a tricky, politically-charged issue is so ridiculous I can’t even get my head around it.
That the press is doing its best to lend credence to Marshall’s complaint is proof that they care more about stoking controversy than they do about the truth. Sadly, they get fans to believe the garbage they spew.
The result? We have a fan base who boos at training camp and would gladly trade a team for a couple of superstars whose jerseys they’d like to wear.
by JeffG on Aug 19, 2009 4:08 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Don't lose hope Jeff..
Most of the reason people are getting so bent out of shap is because the want us to win and they are worried that all these off season issues will stop that from happening..
Little do they know that underneath all the drama and controversy, JMD has been building himself a trojan horse, for want of a better analogy, it looks on the outside like we are gifting the rest of the teams in this league with a gift win.. but when it comes to the game and our squad of Tough, Smart, Versatile players who are hungry to play hard, earn respect and win, jump out of the horse then i guarantee the fans will get back behind this team.
by HorseStance on Aug 19, 2009 4:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
i've said it before...
that i really hate being a Bronco fan in Denver. You get to see how the common fan is quick to criticize and the local media is always looking for their digs in. Kind of like the glass is alway empty, and not even halfway.
I’ve been at bars and even games at invesco where players make a play and get cheered and, literally, the next play get booed and remarks spewed from these “fans” mouths i wouldnt even say about the other team.
It really makes me wonder what it would be like to be a true hometown fan in another town, you know of a respectable team, and see how their fanbase speaks about said team. I think its Denver fans, not just Broncos fans, as the Nuggets are victim of this too.
Go Broncos!
by 3rdegree on Aug 19, 2009 5:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That happens anywhere
There is no shortage of knuckeheads anywhere you go- it’s not just Denver.
by AllBroncsallday on Aug 20, 2009 9:06 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It IS nefarious
or dumb, or something. We don’t need FO control freaks telling players how to modulate their pleasure/relief that a star player isn’t going to be facing a suspension. It reminds me of a story my dad once told me about basic training. The drill instructor told his charges that as they marched their arms should swing nine inches towards the front and twelve inches towards the rear. The results were predictably hilarious.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Aug 19, 2009 5:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If teams don't need PR guidance,
why do all teams have PR departments?
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 2:15 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The company I work for has a PR dept too
but they don’t go around micromanaging employee reactions. If what that employee did was okay why are the Broncos so embarrassed about it? Why did they issue a public apology? Do you really think they’d humiliate themselves all over again just to placate Marshall? They clearly felt that what that employee did was a mistake, even if you don’t. The PR dept.‘s job is to manage the public’s perception of the organization, to make it look good, and in this instance it was the PR dept. itself that made the team look bad. It made the organization look like an overbearing nanny.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Aug 20, 2009 4:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you a football player?
Respectfully, your company and the Broncos are not the same organization with the same kinds of people.
by AllBroncsallday on Aug 21, 2009 3:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You didn't answer my questions
Why are they embarrassed if it’s business as usual? Why did they issue a public apology? Why does everyone but Broncos fans think it was a dumb thing to do?
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Aug 21, 2009 11:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand what you're saying
But I just don’t think this is any big deal, and I don’t see anything nefarious here, I just don’t. And will all respect, you didn’t answer my question either.
My point is this- just because your company does or does not do something, doesn’t mean anything in this context. You cannot compare yourself and your company equally to the Denver Broncos because they are not the same kinds of organizations. You are not a football player, and your company is not a football team, so how things are handled simply are NOT the same between your company and the Denver Broncos Football Club. Simply put, the people who make the rules are not the same people between the two organizations, thus organizational philosophies will differ.
Not to be insulting, but football players are not always the sharpest tools in the shed, you know? Knowing that it is the fact that “grown men say incredibly stupid things all the time”, I think it’s in fact wise and PRUDENT to guide these types of employees in their responses if they are contacted by the media, which is VERY likely.
How likely is it that the media contacts you directly on some sticky issue that your company is involved in? Not likely at all, unless you are a rep that’s given authority to speak to the media (Public Relations), in which case you already know what to say about it. Therefore, it may not be necessary for your PR department to contact you about every potential thing, but that’s up to them and whoever make those determinations. It’s simply not the same environment nor organization.
I’m just a regular joe in my company, no special importance or relationship to the media at all. But just recently, all 300+ of our employees got instructions from our PR department on how to handle potential media contacts re a certain issue. It’s just standard stuff in the business world. I didn’t take offense because I realize it’s just business. I realize it’s not a slight against me, nor an insult to my intelligence. It’s just business. Clearly Brandon and those players that narc’ed to him on the PR coaching don’t get that, which is unfortunate.
It’s not personal, it’s just business.
Ask yourself this: How would it have looked if some player/friend of Brandon’s was asked how he felt about the verdict, and the guy busts out “Yeah, I knew it all the time. That girl was just a liar. a lying slut just trying to get money off Brandon. And that lawyer, what a scumbag…”
That’d look pretty shabby, don’t you think? /This WAS a domestic violence case, let’s remember. The job of a PR department is to AT THE WORST, leave the public feeling nothing at all about you as an organization. How do you think a statement like the one I outlined above would’ve made the Denver Broncos look? “The Broncos SUPPORT beating on women!” Absolutely terrible, thus you do everything you can to avoid that nightmare scenario.
That’s all that I see that went on here. The fact that Brandon’s getting all bent out of shape about something that’s just standard shows how clueless he remains about the “PR Game”.
Sorry, I just don’t see anything nefarious or personal here- just the business of business.
by AllBroncsallday on Aug 30, 2009 10:59 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
And the apology
Sorry, forgot to address this: I think the apology was one of “We’re sorry that we offended you, Brandon.”, not one of “We’re sorry we did what we did.”
I see the two differing significantly in that the first one is a “We’re sorry you’re mad”, whereas the second would be an apology for the action. I don’t think they are sorry for taking the action, but I do believe that they are remorseful for offending Marshall. Thus the apology.
That was the gaffe- offending an already po’ed player. Their mistake, IMO, was not advising Brandon personally beforehand that this was the angle they were taking, and why.
That it was just the business aspect of it, that personally they were all very happy for him. As a team, in the locker room, that they couldn’t be happier. But on the public face of it, they were advising everyone not to be gleeful, and to just be “glad to be moving on as an organization”. Basically, be as blandly pleased as a team as possible to avoid any further possible negative association to the Team.
I have no problem with that- I think the message was the right one to convey, and I see it as their entire job. I am annoyed that they didn’t talk to him first though- that was stupid because had they done so, I don’t think we’d be talking about it. Brandon was clearly surprised by the news, and that should never have happened. Once again, it’s all about communication, isn’t it.
Anyway, I have all respect in the world for you Spock- love your posts so don’t get me wrong here. I just see it as the business of business, and not nefarious. They screwed up in failing to communicate all this to Brandon, in my view.
by AllBroncsallday on Aug 30, 2009 11:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
PR is standard stuff
Because, as another poster said, “Grown men say incredibly stupid things all the time”. Sorry, I just don’t see anything nefarious about it. IMO, it’s Marshall that’s being dumb getting offended by something that wasn’t personal. Nothing to see here.
by AllBroncsallday on Aug 20, 2009 9:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My sentiments
EXACTLY.
"Talk about the Broncos and I'm gonna 'put my dukes up'. I'm gonna hit you with these rings." -- Rod Smith's rebuttal to Jamie Dukes
by broncosmontana on Aug 19, 2009 8:51 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Point
and as far as receiving talent goes it should always be pointed out that the Patriots are 3-0 in Super Bowls without Moss and 0-1 with Moss. Even though he is arguably their best offensive weapon.
Tis better not to throw it to the deep receiver but the open receiver.
by Kfustud on Aug 20, 2009 9:07 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I should add to my previous comment that the coaches probably knew
he didn’t know the playbook inside and out yet. They know he missed the entire offseason and had only participated in a few practices. It ain’t rocket science.
by Broncos_FTW on Aug 19, 2009 3:57 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
If they trade him
It should be to the Minnesota Farves.
Victor Frankl:
What man actually needs is not a tensionless state but rather the striving and struggling for some goal worthy of him. What he needs is not the discharge of tension at any cost, but the call of a potential meaning waiting to be fulfilled by him.
Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms – to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.
by wyoeng on Aug 19, 2009 4:10 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
LOL...
I am loathe to bring it up…but does anyone think that Favre came back just to play against Cutler, and try to prove his arm is still stonger than Cutlers??? Favre has always had a HUGE EGO!!
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 19, 2009 9:33 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
That comment alone made reading this epically long comment section worth every hour.
I hadn’t thought about their rivalry. Maybe Favre will sign with the Lions next year to get two more showdowns.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 2:19 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
He didn't bother to learn the playbook because
he never had any intention of playing here. Bowlen had promised to try to trade him and Marshall, in his ignorance, thought other clubs would stand in line for the chance to get him. It never occurred to him that it would not be possible to find someone offering anything worthwhile in return.
Marshall isn’t without leverage though. If he refuses to play, then The Broncos obviously don’t have to pay him but they would still have to leave a roster spot open for him. There is no way they would waste the spot when it could be given to someone who may actually help the team. Nor are they going to put him on POP or something just to teach him a lesson. While it would not cost that much to pay him to be inactive, they won’t pay him to do nothing when there is no prospect of using him later. If he can’t be traded (which seems more and more likely), he will get his will and be cut.
If after being cut he thinks there is a big fat contract with another team waiting, he is in for a rude awakening (unless, of course, he might catch the attention of Al Davis).
by warmick on Aug 19, 2009 4:30 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
the media
has baited a few hooks and it looks like they caught themselves a Jay Cutler and a Brandon Marshall. It seems though that Marshall had probably cashed his ticket as soon as Shanahan was fired. From my impressions, Shanahan coddled a lot of his star players, something that he wouldn’t have done early on. I bet they weren’t too thrilled with McDaniels “another cog in the wheel” approach and wanted to go to someplace where they could be a rockstar in football pads. I’m sure the Raiders or the Lions could use a wide receiver.
by matt97c83 on Aug 19, 2009 4:57 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Slow Down... Relax 4 just a second!
It is a lot simpler than it seems. I agree with what warmick says just above this comment in that Marshal obviously blew it in thinking that just because Ownership and management said that they would try to honor his request, that he was quaranteed a trade. NOT SMART! But BM has not been very smart many times in his past.
The other point in annother comment was that Marshal didn’t have a playbook during his rehab and hold out from otas. Why would an “IFFY” player get a playbook to study, copy and turn over to the new team that he is traded to and thus pass along the playbook to every other team that the broncos play this year!?
If Brandon had been given a playbook to study, way back then, then I guarantee u that he was NOT EVER going to be traded to begin with. I don’t think he did get a playbook to study for just those reasons. How could he even be offered one and still believe that he had an opportunity to BE traded?
That is why BMarsh is so far behind in his understanding of the offense and guess what! Two weeks of studying the playbook while rehabing his Hammie is NOT going to get him up to speed with the rest of the O, who went through OTA’s and all of the rest of the things that he missed.
Brandon admitted that he is behind and out of football shape, and he understands why he is where he is on the depth chart, etc., and when asked wheather he could get back with the first team it cracked him up. He knows where he stands next to the rest of the tallent at his possition on this team, and he knows what he is up against to get back to the first team.
After all that has happened in his life, and the fact that it is “finnally over”, to Branden Marshal, that is a big deal and reason to be happy! Just think about it from his point of view. If in fact he is changed and this is the end to all of the off field distractions, then he is ecstatic about that, and to have a staff member (who took it upon themselves, without direction from the front office) try to influence certain team members in an extreemly negative manner, against Brandon “RECOVERING SOME SELF ASSURANCE AND POSSITIVE FEALINGS,” then that simply added to his fealings like he would just as soon be “out-a-here”!
I personally don’t know how I would be able to handle continuing to work as a professional under the circumstances in the same town where I went through it all. Yes, He brought it all on himself, but if you read between the lines and you have a little insite into the nature of how different people react to embare-ass-ment.
I do believe that brandon came in to camp fully knowing that he was going to be a Bronco this year, like it or not, and that he was absolutely dedicated to having a record year, even if it was for the purpose of getting a great contract next year.
The “APOLLOGY” by the staffer was certainly owed to Brandon, if in fact we can believe what the msm said happened, and it didn’t help what I thought was a player at odds, who was trying to get back to normal with this team.
Just annother oppinion.
It is better to keep silent, and appear to be wise, then to ramble on and remove all doubt! The Wisest Man, Solomon.
by metalman5050 on Aug 19, 2009 5:23 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
not to be a dick
but dude, spellcheck. seriously
by 3rdegree on Aug 19, 2009 5:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
therem is know seil shek
It is better to keep silent, and appear to be wise, then to ramble on and remove all doubt! The Wisest Man, Solomon.
by metalman5050 on Aug 19, 2009 5:34 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I agree with everything,
up until you say that the PR guy was telling them not to help Brandon recover some self… That may be how BM took it, but it looks like typical corporate PR work to me. Tell your staff not to look too happy about a controversial issue.
A lot of us think Brandon is on the right track with his life off the field, myself included. However, there are vocal members of the Denver community that don’t see it that way, and one misstatement by a player could really light a fire under their vocal butts.
I also think the Broncos can see how Brandon would see it the way he did, and I would hope that their apology would address the fact that the Broncos are very happy for him.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 2:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
High risk/high reward
I love MHR and you guys so much…so many different takes on a clearly very emotional topic close to everyone’s bronco heart.
Just another opinion here: Players agitating for money/trade is nothing new, it’s all part of the bargaining process and clubs and their coaches are well versed in stone-walling the media – McD has got that down pretty good! And as much as we’d like to know about what goes on, there is no right to know.
So..to summarise the debate so far…
BMarsh speaks to Shanahan’s penchant for high risk/high reward players and Marshall’s risk/reward ratio has been well documented.
The Broncos probably would like to pay Marshall, but his risks are starting to outweigh the rewards. Marshall’s value is plunging by the day, and his request for a trade to be accommodated is not going to happen unless someone actually matches the Broncos valuation – unlikely given the risks, I would’ve thought. As metalman5050 says, it probably never ocurred to Marshall and his agent that there wouldn’t be a queue around the block for his services.
My vote is the new regime are nothing if not pragmatic and they’ll find a way to get Marshall on the field for week 1, they at least want the opposition to game plan for the man. It’s either that or PUP.
And Matt Jones still can’t get a job after spending $20,000 of his own money to get in shape at the IMG academy….
Sorry I can’t stay to reply, it’s getting on for 1am here and I have my annual appraisal tomorrow morning. Should I do a Bmarsh – show up unprepared, act surly, declare trust issues and demand a rise?
Maybe not….
"The great fallacy is that the game is first and last about winning. It's nothing of the kind. The game is about glory. It is about doing things in style, with a flourish, about going out to beat the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
by orangecrush22 on Aug 19, 2009 5:45 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
BM
Time for a BM. Can we stop using that. It is making me want to go to the bathroom
I ride the short bus!
by scottwchicago on Aug 19, 2009 5:47 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
LMAO
2funny… I’ll quit! I always thought about that 2.
It is better to keep silent, and appear to be wise, then to ramble on and remove all doubt! The Wisest Man, Solomon.
by metalman5050 on Aug 19, 2009 5:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
BM
Everybody on this board sure is quick to go the the “BM” card, but while Cutler gets just as much heat I sure don’t see any references to “JC”. Funny how that happens. Anyway while they are both big babies they were also the two most talented players on the offense last year. Denver has downgraded drastically at QB and losing Marshall will have the same effect at the WR spot.
by The Wad on Aug 19, 2009 7:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
WWAAA!
I am so tired of star athletes whining about unfairness or trust issues. Give me a freakin’ break. Bmarsh wants a big money contract and he is in no position with no leverage to get one. Now he is making mountains out of mole hills to create(read dramatize) problems with he team so they will trade him. He is trying to orchestrate a way out when there is no other way to get the big money he wants. He learned well from JayC(Although his wasn’t about money now , but money down the road). All of this drama is Bmarsh and Bmarsh only. He knows the only way he is going to get his money now is to force his way out. But again he has absolutely no leverage. What I find interesting is that some think this PR problem came from up higher than the lowly staffer. But don’t you think by now other players would be coming out and defending BMarsh or even JayC, and that has never happened.Some will say well if others talk they risk being dropped or chastised by the team. Give me a break this is American not the Soviet Union or Iran. These guys would speak out if the problems with trust that Jayc and BMarsh claim were going on. It seems to me the rest of the guys are enjoying the new coach and are preparing for the season. BMarsh is an immature baby in the vein of JayC and the Broncos would be better off without both. Their talents are undeniable but their immaturity and lack of leadership hurt the team more than their talents help. I get that we are all entitled to our opinions but I don’t get people defending either of these guys at all. The only reason JoshMac has ruffled feathers is that he is about team and not coddling individuals and you are seeing the ones that can’t handle that type of coaching and leadership and who they are. Neither Champ or BDawk has stood by either guy and that to me speaks volumes!!!!
by postalmoose1 on Aug 19, 2009 6:43 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
pioli
any way of getting this guy to the chiefs?
i personally hope he would be willing to give up some high draft picks to get this guy
marshall and bowe that would be amazing but it would take hell of a lot to take a player of this magnitude from the broncos
obviously if i was a denver fan i would definitely want to keep this guy
why not just rework his contract and give him a huge raise?
im sure character issues can be dealt with but at this rate, marshall will definitely
be out of denver quick
by andrew33 on Aug 19, 2009 8:07 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Rule NO.1
NEVER TRADE IN YOUR OWN DIVISION.
fader nation is a conquered nation
Jerry Jones is Al Davis with a smile!
by mdierk on Aug 19, 2009 9:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unless ....
the guy sux….. ;)
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
by Disturbed70 on Aug 20, 2009 4:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
isnt
this what people said about cutler though…
that he had no leverage against the management?
if marshall keeps this up, i would think McDaniels would definitely lobby to trade him away
im not sure because im not a broncos fan but McDaniels seems like a guy who
wont take this kind of behavior from his players…
by andrew33 on Aug 19, 2009 8:11 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
keeps what up?
Going to practice despite a temporary demotion and a beef with the PRness of the PR department.
Just be happy with Lelie.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 2:40 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Holy...
Wow, I’d LOVE to post thoughts on this but it literally took me an HOUR to read everyone else’s. I’m too tired…LOL
by TheMastermind on Aug 19, 2009 8:42 PM MDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
LMAO
I was just about to post the same thing. But now even that thought has been posted. Guess I get to hit the sack early! : ) Niters!
"Talk about the Broncos and I'm gonna 'put my dukes up'. I'm gonna hit you with these rings." -- Rod Smith's rebuttal to Jamie Dukes
by broncosmontana on Aug 19, 2009 8:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously...
WOW Literally everything that CAN be said on this subject HAS been said twice in just hours! LOL This must surely violate the laws of physical science in some dangerous way. Hopefully it will just create a time vortex that swallows the city of Oakland. We can only hope.
by TheMastermind on Aug 19, 2009 9:39 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
awesome.
hilarious.
"I want this team to be tough, smart and prepared to play well under pressure...Everybody here in this organization is going to be held accountable to do their job — their piece of the puzzle to make this team a competitor for a championship every season." J-Mac
by denver_diaspora on Aug 19, 2009 9:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can anyone tell me if Marshall has any legal issues with the NFL still?
Regarding the court appearence? Or is it all said and done with no further suspension.
by bfree2bronc on Aug 20, 2009 12:18 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope so however I have been wrong on this subject before.
GO BRONCOS IN 2009 AND BEYOND!!
2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
by weazel on Aug 20, 2009 12:24 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess that could be it
maybe The Broncos know about an arrest in Siberia that the DP hasn’t dug up yet. ;-)
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 2:41 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I finished!! :-)
I even read most of it.
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
by jibbons on Aug 20, 2009 2:42 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I've given up on him
so screw him. Have fun being a diva.
I thought you knew that algebra was all razzamatazz. A Globetrotter always saves the good algebra for the final minutes.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Aug 20, 2009 12:26 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
B Marshall, B Gone
What a wuss. What happened to the good old days when players thought it was an honor to be on a pro football team. It was about being a team. No “I’s” Marshall is too much of a distraction. Off with his head. B Marshall, B Gone…
by Tim111 on Aug 20, 2009 5:18 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





























