Is It Possible . . .
I did a lot of soul searching before finally deciding to go ahead and make this post. I kept setting it aside, not wanting to be seen as someone who was trying to stir the pot. Yet, there have been a fair number of comments made, not only here at MHR, but on other sites as well that has forced me to come back to this same question again and again.
Is it possible to root for your team to succeed while simultaneously rooting for a coach or player to fail?
Before I begin, I would like to clarify a couple of things. First, I have no intention of naming names here. The purpose is not to call anyone out. It is not to say one fan is better than another. It is not to say that there is only a single way of being a fan. Second, this post is nothing more, and nothing less than my own attempt to explore, discuss and understand a concept that I have found perplexing, confusing and contradictory.
Let me begin by sharing how I've been raised to think about the Broncos in particular, and sports teams in general. I will be using the Broncos/football as an example, because this IS a Broncos fan site after all.
I have long been an advocate of the concept that for a football team to be successful (success here meaning getting to and winning the Super Bowl) must start with everyone (and I do mean everyone) in the organization being on the same page, at the same time, working toward the same goal.
The ownership must be willing to provide the fiscal and physical resources necessary for success. This includes salaries, equipment, training facilities, staff, etc. The owner must run a fiscally effective organization that looks not only to the bottom line, but also to investing in the future, carefully balancing current need against future salary cap restrictions.
The GM of the team must be willing/able to translate the owner's fiscal policies into successful personnel decisions. That is, getting the personnel needed to bring the coach's strategies and plans to a successful conclusion. The GM is the one who is charged with contract negotiations in order to not only bring in new talent, but to maintain existing talent, and provide for the development of all players.
The Coaching staff is responsible for devising training programs, player development, scouting of potential talent, creating effective offensive/defensive schemes and teaching the players how to be effective and win. The coach is responsible for guiding the players during the game, making adjustments to improve the possibilities of winning, and overseeing the entire game.
The players are the ones who are charged with making the coach's plans work. Every one of the 53 players on the roster should be working to the best of their ability to improve at each practice. And every one of them needs to be ready to answer the call to action should it come. All three units (Offense, Defensive and Special Teams) need to know the game plan, know how to adjust should it be called for and be ready to execute their portion of the game at the appropriate time. How many times have we seen good teams brought down when one of the units fails to perform as needed?
As a fan, I choose to root for the team. This means I root for the owner to do all things the owner needs to do to give my team a chance to win the Super Bowl. The GM needs to do his part, the coaches their's and the players need to make it happen. That is what I root for throughout the year. I may not like a coach or a player, but I will root for them to be successful so that the team succeeds.
This is why I become confused, perplexed, and mystified when I read a fan say that they hope that a coach or player fails. Since my assumption is that it will take all coaches and players functioning in unison for the team to be successful, I cannot comprehend how to wish for a player or coach to fail can represent anything other than hoping for the team to fail.
I've found myself distressed, since the beginning of the year, by the number of times I've read (not just here at MHR, but on other websites as well) saying things like "I hope that McDaniels blows it," or "I hope Orton bombs." Neither of those statements, by the way, are direct quotes from any fan, they are intended to be paraphrases used as examples. Both of those suggest to me that the fan wants to see the Broncos fail.
Whether a fan likes it or not, McDaniels is our head coach. Whether a fan likes it or not, Orton has been named as the starting quarterback. Whether a fan likes it or not, Bowlen has backed both of these choices. Thus I find myself unable to comprehend how a fan advocate for either McDaniels or Orton to fail. If the coach and starting quarterback fail, then it seems to me that we can expect the team to fail as well.
A counter-example. I have not been fond of Marshall's off field choices. Nor have I been particularly inspired by the way he has handled each of his off seasons since being drafted. I've been fairly upset by the way he has chosen to act since returning to camp. But, I would still love to see him in uniform, working his butt off to learn the playbook and demonstrated the skills that McDaniels wants him to demonstrate, so that he can be a first team receiver for us again. Even though, I believe that he most likely wants out of Denver, I will root for him to succeed right up to the time he is gone. Should that happen, I still won't root for him to fail, he will simply become irrelevant for me.
Which brings me back to my original question: In your opinion is it possible to root for your team to succeed while simultaneously rooting for a coach or player to fail?
Any way, thanks for taking a moment to walk down this road with me.
13-3 Baby!!! until we aren't
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
47 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I suppose the less devoted fans would feel that way and believe it's justified.
Not to say anyone is less devoted or less educated than us here, but even those who are critical of the coach here still want success all around. McGeorge is one example.
In my opinion, if you like a team, you should support the entire team. To love the team but hope for coaches failure isn’t supporting the team in my opinion.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Aug 22, 2009 12:10 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
There is a difference between those
“Wanting” to see (coach, player, team) failure so that (maybe) you can say that you are right and, those that “think” or even “believe”, that there will be failure…Some are just so bitter that they can’t get past the “wanting” to see McDaniels fail…I believe Fans like McGeorge (not to pick on you McG) truely hope that their own opinions and assumptions are wrong and really want to see the Team succeed but just see the same evaluative facts through a more critical eye…He/they are 100% hopeful Fan, just not 100% faithful or believer (YET!)…For example, I don’t believe that he/they hopes that Prater fails but he needs to see prove that he will be better and correct his mistakes of last year, but as for my myself, I “beleive” (not blinly mind you) that Matt will be better and improved until I see that he has not improved…
by BroncoSense72 on Aug 22, 2009 6:23 AM MDT up reply actions
Correct. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I hope I wrong about McDaniels.
But when I see the guy trying to trade for Cassel or trading away an unknown #1 for a 2nd round pick, it doesn’t make sense to me. IMO, McDaniels is exercising poor judgment or showing us incredible hubris. I can point to several moves The Coach has made that really make me scratch my head. MHR tries to justify them all, but some explanations are big time reaches in my mind.
I don’t want Denver to stink, but if they do, I want us to pull the plug on the McDaniels experiment much sooner than later.
Love the Broncos, don't like their Coach.
Question?
Why fire Shanny and replace him with a coach that simply continues to “stay-the-course”? If we wanted to do that, then we could have hired a Wade Phillips clone and simply hired a coach with no authority. There is simply no way to evaluate the success or failure of McD’s decisions at this point in the season. Time will tell if he made wise decisions or not. But if we want to talk about exercising poor judgment, we have a host of evidence from the Shanny administration: Travis Henry, Javon Walker, Maurice Clarett (taken in the 3rd round..good god man), Darryl Gardner, Jarvis Moss, etc…
As to pulling the plug on the McD experiment let’s get one thing clear. McD will get at least a 3 years to make his mark and the 4th will be where he’s either made it or failed, so we better get mentally prepared to see him around whether people out there like it or not. If he ends up failing (i.e., Broncos regressed, don’t make the playoffs) then he’ll be fired and we’ll start over with someone new. Do I think that will happen? I sure hope not. McD is changing the culture here, stressing team over divas, football players over “stars” and demonstrating a great deal of poise for someone who’s still extremely young in “football years”. We’ll find out this season if he’s over his head. I’m rooting for him to be successful because that means the Broncos will be successful.
Go Broncos!
Beware the wrath of a patient adversary.
John C. Calhoun --
by bcfunk on Aug 22, 2009 8:44 AM MDT up reply actions 5 recs
Agreed and rec'd.
Barring a complete meltdown this season, I feel like McD and his staff deserve AT LEAST three years to implement his philosophy, schemes, and personnel. As it goes for draft picks, it follows for coaches as well: you need at least a few seasons to get a good feel for how they perform.
Think about the defense. My belief is that the state of affairs last season existed almost entirely due to coaching/scheme turnaround, and poor drafting of defensive players. To make matters worse, both issues played off of each other as well. How do you bring in players when you have no idea if the scheme you run this season will be the one you run the next? And how do you pick a scheme based on a hodgepodge of players who don’t, as a whole, dictate using any one particular scheme anyway? The reason PIT has such a great defense is that they have had LeBeau and his zone-blitz 3-4 scheme FOREVER. Knowing the scheme means they can go out and find players that fit the scheme.
Basically, if McD gets us to 8-8 give or take a few games, I think he deserves to stay on. If we lose close games, but the team continues to fight it out, then I will call that a HUGE improvement over last years squad that gave up in more than a few games. Even if the overall record is worse. And if three years from now we are a tough, disciplined, team-first group then I will be absolutely ecstatic.
And BTW, I agree totally with BShrout. No true fan wishes for any person on their team to fail. I also appreciate McGeorge and his perspective. In the end we all want the Broncos to be successful, regardless of who is coaching or playing.
Kool-Aid Addict & DP Message Board Refugee
Another advantage of long-held schemes
Not only does the staff know what types of players fit well, but every year, you only have a handful of guys to teach it to, and everyone around them can help out. The reason the Broncos’ transition to the 3-4 is painful is that almost none of them know the defense or its terminologies.
by BroncosBassist on Aug 22, 2009 12:23 PM MDT up reply actions
Agreed
Yet, I don’t remember ever hearing you say “I hope McDaniels fails.” What I recall is your saying that you are skeptical about whether or not he has want it takes to succeed.
IMHO those are two totally different attitudes.
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by Brian Shrout on Aug 22, 2009 11:10 AM MDT up reply actions
In your defense, though
I have seen plenty of posters (see, I refrained from calling them trolls) say things like “I HATE MCDANIELS!” elsewhere, and go on to talk about how they can’t wait until he fails. Very strange behavior. Most of them are just uninformed about the Marshall situation at this point, though.
by BroncosBassist on Aug 22, 2009 12:25 PM MDT up reply actions
McGeorge definitely isn't one of them, btw.
by BroncosBassist on Aug 22, 2009 12:25 PM MDT up reply actions
Agreed
McG is a healthy skeptic who states his reasons for skepticism clearly and concisely, and who, nevertheless, roots for the success of the team.
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by Brian Shrout on Aug 22, 2009 1:54 PM MDT up reply actions
hugs
your heart is in the right place…we want the team to succeed…because the last few years have been way not fun…and (almost) starting over has been totally painful…and its so hard to see how this can really turn out okay…and we can all be happy about the broncos….but…at least…thats what we want…to be proud of our team…and be happy for them…and for us.
MHR...and proud of it!
On the whole "Trading for Cassel" escapade.
I don’t know how many of you out there have watched a Kansas City game yet, but I’ve peeked in for a few drives (against Minnesota in fact). And Matt (although he’s no star) displays the attributes that are necessary in Josh’s system. He manages the game, makes pretty accurate throws, and has good mechanics. I can almost garruntee you that all of those things were coached into him. They aren’t talents, they are skills; and he’s pretty darn good at them considering his level of experience.
Taking that into account, is it really strange that Josh would try to go ahead and get him? We most likely would have gotten Cassel, AND a high draft pick for Cutler in that situation. Draft picks that could be used to help our dismal defense and special teams.
Though I was COMPLETELY against it at the time, and thought it was completely retarded in my own right; McDaniels saw something there that was beneficial to the Broncos. That point could be argued to death, but the fact remains that Josh is here to win, not lose. And he’s not going to bring in somebody just because he personally likes him. The guy is straight business. He displays it in every interview, on and off the field. He’s here to win, and make Denver a better team in as many areas, and as quickly as possible.
I see where you are coming from McG, and I believe its a very personal position you’re taking. Through this whole ordeal (and as I get older naturally) i’m learning to lean on wisom more than my own intelligence. And wisdom tells me that these guys know more about the situation than I do. Whether I like their decisions or not, I am going to accept them and support them until I am given a reason not to.
If you really want to see Denver succeed, than I urge you to try to take the same approach. Josh didn’t come here to make a laughing stock of himself. He wants to make something worthwhile out of his career, and he deserves that opportunity without critisism from his own fanbase.
It may be hard to swallow, but it is the medicine we need. I don’t know about you, but I want to get rid of the disease and sickness that we played with last year. Until it’s obvious that we’re allergic and this just isn’t right for us, let’s give McDaniels and the new Broncos support and encouragement.
It's Orange Crush time. And no I am NOT talking about the soft-drink.
Which I beg the question: "Can liquid really be... soft?"
The past is settled, its only the future now. A new one, for Denver, and for BMarsh. Light'em up Beast!
I feel your pain B
and the only way for McDaniels to erase any doubt about himself is to succeed, and I believe he will make every effort to do just that even if it dang near kills him. He said he has never lost which that can be taken as being somewhat egotistic or sarcastic but it can also be that he is very confident in his upbringing and his own ability to make things (in the football realm) happen. I’ll play along with him, let’s go get ’em Coach!!! 13-3 Baby!!!
Historical facts
He said he has never lost which that can be taken as being somewhat egotistic or sarcastic but it can also be that he is very confident in his upbringing and his own ability to make things (in the football realm) happen.
You know, looking back over his record since being an athlete in high school, I can’t find a record of him being associated with a team that had a losing record. I took it as just a historical reference coupled with a statement on his desire to win.
Hillis/Moreno in '09
What I was referring to was the msm using that statement as a snide remark.
In McDaniels case I believe it is a historical statement coupled with confidence he learned from his father on the field and around the dining room table. Thanks bear.
How on earth
can one expect success from the team without success from the coach? I can’t wrap my head around this concept. It just doesn’t make any sense. If a team does well, more than likely the coach and his staff are going to have something to do with it. If you want your coach to fail (and hence the team, which only makes sense) you really must not care much about the team in the first place. Not saying this about you, but just in general.
Take my advice, I'm not using it !!!
It just shows how pathetic some of these "fans" really are.
Like, for instance, some of the crowd over at the DP boards. These are supposed “fans” who want McD fired RIGHT NOW. As in, just before the season starts. If you follow their flawed logic to its conclusion, then that would leave “their” team in a fairly disastrous situation.
As a real fan, I just can’t get my head around that sort of thinking…
Kool-Aid Addict & DP Message Board Refugee
This is a VERY interesting and complex question
Well, after the whole McD-Cutler ordeal, i vowed never to root for Mcd ever. But, i soon realized that even if i strongly disagreed with his decisions, that i would ultimatly start to root FOR him just because of the fact that he is part of MY favorite team. I just find it sooo hard to even dislike someone, when they are a vital part of the franchise that I live my life around. It gets really hard to do this in the Bmarsh situation because he doesnt WANT to be part of this team. I thought to myself, “How can i possibly root for someone that doesnt want to play for this team that i love and admire?” But, I realized that i just coudnt possibly root against him when i see him in a Broncos uniform.
This is similar to the Ron Artest- Lakers situation. (I am a Lakers fan but not nearly as big a Lakers fanatic as I am of the Broncos) When i saw Artest go absolutly crazy on Kobe during the playoffs, i just coudnt believe it. I completely DISPISED the way he ran over to Kobe (My favorite player) and wanted to fight and also how Artest ran his finger across his throat to Kobe. I was digusted by Artest and i really didnt like the guy. But, just a couple months later he was signed by the Lakers and I magically became a fan of his. It was weird. I hated him so much before but now I became his fan. I came to realize that no matter how much i didnt like his personality, the fact that he could help my favorite team win a title overruled the fact that i hated him before. It is kind of like being mad at a family member. You know that they are on your “Team” amd they are close to you in a sense of being on that team. That no matter what they do, you will always root for them.
So to answer your question if its possible to root for your team while at the same time root for a member of that team to fail, no. That is in my case however it will be different to others. The bottom line is that on Game Day Sunday, when i see MCD in his hoodie calling plays and leading us to a win and when i see Bmarsh in that Shiny, sleek Blue Broncos uniform guiding us down the field playing for the team that i would die for……….I cant help but root for them…….AND the team.
What about the tainted situation?
Manny Ramirez and PEDs.
Clarence Kay and doing all kinds of bad stuff.
Derrick Rose and SAT cheating?
Tom Caple and almost killing people.
I do think there are occasions when fans have the right to expect better out of those they pay to watch and represent their city.
In general though, with a level playing field, I’d prefer to see fans all the way in rather than part way in.
I’d much rather see a passionate Dolphins fan than a bandwagon Saints fan.
Granted, there are exceptions
Yet, in the case of McDaniels, he is not guilty of any of those types of exceptional cases, so I have a hard time in reconciling the concept of a person saying “I want the Broncos to win, but I want McDaniels to fail.” That type of statement seems contradictory to me.
So far as the exceptional cases go: my inclination would be to not cheer for the player when he plays, and promote the idea that the team would be better served if he were not present. But if the league/team/society chooses to allow him to play, then I would hope that the team succeeds in spite of the problems he brings.
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by Brian Shrout on Aug 22, 2009 1:42 AM MDT up reply actions
Obviously, the answer to your question is no
so it’s good to know that several of the people who are critical of McDaniels have also said they hope they’re wrong. That’s one of the differences between MHR and other Broncos forums.
You implied that success begins at the top, with the owner, and I think that’s exactly right. It’s not just that he provides fiscal and physical resources. Evaluating and developing talent also begins at the top. It starts with an owner capable of recognizing managerial and coaching talent, including the people (e.g. Ellis) who help him choose a GM and HC. If he chooses well he’ll end up with an HC and GM capable of recognizing scouting, coaching and player talent. If they choose well they’ll end up with scouts capable of recognizing potential, players capable of becoming solid contributors and stars, and coaches capable of helping them get there. If the owner builds and supports a motivated and effective managerial and coaching team the latter in turn will create and support a motivated and effective team on the field, and the wins will follow.
Bowlen has a reputation for being a good owner because he picks good people and lets them do their jobs. Like anyone who’s good at what he does he learns from his mistakes. In choosing Shanahan he picked a head coach skilled at evaluating and developing offensive coaching and player talent but seriously deficient, as it turned out, when it came to defense and special teams and unwilling or unable to delegate responsibility for those units. In fact, as they got worse he delegated even less and they got even worse, in a negative feedback spiral that eventually cost him his job. Bowlen’s other mistake was in allowing Shanahan to be in effect the GM as well as the head coach, which was more than he could handle.
Bowlen rectified the latter by having both the coach and GM report to him, and I suspect that, although he chose another brilliant offensive mind, he was careful this time to choose someone not deficient in other aspects of the game. McDaniels not only has defensive coaching experience (for which he got high marks), he picked an outstanding defensive coordinator in Nolan and apparently is letting him do his job. As for special special teams, it was evident in the San Francisco game that they’re drastically improved. Several times our kick returners broke through the first wave of tacklers because they got good blocks at the point of attack, something that was missing last year. And our coverage units did a much better job of fighting off blocks and getting to the kick returner.
I’m optimistic that McDaniels and Xanders will put together a winning team because I have confidence in Bowlen and his team. But even if I didn’t I’d hope I was wrong.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Aug 22, 2009 6:29 AM MDT reply actions 4 recs
I concur with my Pointy-eared friend.
"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra
"No, I'm from Iowa, I only work in outer space."
It's possible for fair weather fans to feel that way
Great post though B – it’s possible for ‘regular’ or people who don’t consider themselves ‘die-hard’ or to ‘bleed orange and blue’…. But if on claims either of the latter, they should be on board, or stating their disapproval along with the hopes that they are wrong. That’s logical to me.
Good discussions.
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 22, 2009 9:30 AM MDT reply actions
A few degrees off course
I fall in the category of die-hard fans of the Denver Broncos who have no confidence or respect for McDaniels and Orton. The knee-jerk reaction would be to say “I hope the team succeeds, but McDaniels and Orton fail”, which has been discussed at length to be nearly impossible. After a couple of weeks of calming down and putting my opinions in a more sequential and logical manner, the more accurate description would be the following:
I will root for the Broncos, and always hope for success. However, I have no belief that the Broncos can be successful with Orton at QB. Additionally, since it is McDaniels who has anointed Orton as his starter seemingly no matter what, I do not believe we can be successful with McDaniels as coach as long as he refuses to acknowledge that he may be wrong on his QB assessment.
Ultimately, I do not believe you can hope for team success and individual failure at the same time. But I do believe you can hope for team success but believe in individual failure that will in turn cause the team to fail.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted and then used against you.
As I mentioned in my reply to McGeorge
Your italicized statement represents legitimate and healthy skepticism, rather than the contradictory attitude that I’ve found so perplexing.
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by Brian Shrout on Aug 22, 2009 11:15 AM MDT up reply actions
I'm confused
These two statements appear contradictory. I suppose that’s what perplexes me at times.
But I do believe you can hope for team success but believe in individual failure that will in turn cause the team to fail.
Perhaps I’m missing something, but the second half of the statement – that you hope for an individual failure that will in turn cause the team to fail – contradicts the first statement, that you hope for team success. If you get your desires met, the team will fail. In this case, this is an violation of Aristotle’s statement that A must either be A or not A. If you desire an ultimate outcome of failure, you are not hoping for success.
Which is fine by me, if that’s your preference. Obviously, I take another approach.
Hillis/Moreno in '09
hope vs. expectation
he hopes the team will do well
he expects it to do poorly due to the coach and his chosen QB
What he said...
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted and then used against you.
No
The right thing for ‘Bronco Country’ is to move their allegiance to Chicago. You can’t hope for failure from your QB and your head coach and simultaneously claim to be a fan. What you are is somebody who thinks the Broncos owe you something— whether its a vicarious jolt of superiority or ‘street-cred’ at the water cooler.
“Bronco Country’ are not fans, they are spoiled dependents.
by PredominantlyOrange on Aug 22, 2009 10:49 AM MDT reply actions 2 recs
Now that
Is very well stated. (<— Period)
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 22, 2009 10:53 AM MDT up reply actions
So PJ...Off topic here...
But what the hell does “I am Mine” mean. It is now my favorite PJ offering— I love the old Gordon Lighfoot folk song feel with the modern edge. But why does he decide, at the end, that maybe they should hide? I’ve hear him say that it began as a tribute to the tragedy in Sweden…but me thinks there is something deeper.
Your thoughts?
by PredominantlyOrange on Aug 22, 2009 11:02 AM MDT up reply actions
I think it has to do with accountability/safety due to that accountability in society
and how it’s vanishing – you know kinda along the lines of ‘there ain’t going to be no middle anymore’…. This lack of accountability in our society almost makes it to where one must withdraw into the one thing we can own – ourselves…
At least in part….
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 22, 2009 11:35 AM MDT up reply actions
As in...
Who knows what others might decide to do, but we do have ourselves? We have to find some solace in that? Because he changes his mind again in the last verse and says we don’t have to hide.
Do you like the song?
by PredominantlyOrange on Aug 22, 2009 11:40 AM MDT up reply actions
Definitely
And one of the most underrated/undisovered albums in their repertoire.
Yeah, the chorus of that song pulls at a certain part of me like no other – about things ‘left behind’ or things that could have been so, but I didn’t take for granted…At the end, the last line is ’it’s safe to hide’ isn’t it? I dig….
And Eddie has a way at bordering his poetic-ness on morbidity, or having it directly produced from something negative, that just blows the mind…. Like I hope we do this season!
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 22, 2009 11:49 AM MDT up reply actions
I think both Clapton and Vedder...
…get lots of credit for a lot of things. But both are extremely underrated when it comes to how powerful they sing…the emotion and the feel. Niether would win a singing contest, but both have the gift of saying so much through inflection.
by PredominantlyOrange on Aug 22, 2009 12:10 PM MDT up reply actions
Agreed
Dyan was largely underrated as most don’t hear the inflection being used, especially after his motorcycle accident started changing his voice so early in his career.
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 22, 2009 12:32 PM MDT up reply actions
Crazy PO
We were just talking about it, I turn on NFL Network and they’re playing “The Fixer” as preseason music!!! (Prelude to the Dallas – Tennessee game, also played throughout)
Ironically, the chorus to this new tune has a reminiscent trace of the “I Am Mine”… “If I could get it back again, yeah, yeah, yeah”
I posted a fanshot about it, you can hear the song at pj.com. Good stuff
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 22, 2009 1:53 PM MDT up reply actions
Back on topic
I tend to think in terms of logic. Wanting the team to do well but not the coach is something I can’t comprehend logically. They go hand in hand. You can’t have it both ways in this one because it’s not logically possible. Jay Cutler wanting out before McDaniels was even hired then blaming him for Cutler beign traded is an example of how people don’t or won’t think logically about something. It makes no sense to me therefore I get frustrated at people because the can’t see the logic in that. McDaniels will do fine or he won’t. The team will do fine or it won’t. Like McGeorge has stated I have’nt been happy with some of the coaches decisions but time will tell if they are in the best interest of the Team and I stress Team. I am not the most gifted or knowledgeable person when it comes to football. I try and see the picture from all sides so I can develope an opinion based on what seems logical to me.
Sorry for rambling on.
This season has seen a lot of changes. I do hope for the best and the sucess of the Team
It is what it is nothing more nothing less
Definitions....
fan
2 /fæn/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [fan] Show IPA
–noun
an enthusiastic devotee, follower, or admirer of a sport, pastime, celebrity, etc.: a baseball fan; a great fan of Charlie Chaplin.
pasted from dictionary.com…
The truth of the matter is that every fan base has all three parts of this definition….
enthusiastic devotees…
followers…..
and admirers….
each is no less of a fan….until they aren’t one, and that must be determined for ones self…
Which brings me to this….no matter how much we argue and try to persuade others to think the way we do….from both sides…the end result is the decision by the individual…to be a fan or not….
"The question that sometimes drives me hazy, Am I or the others crazy?" -Albert Einstein
only one reason to cheer against McDaniels
The only way a true fan would want to cheer against McDaniels is to hope that with a poor showing then the ownership would feel like the made a mistake and move on earlier and not wait a couple years to find out. While my thoughts are McDaniels has made some rookie mistakes, here is the way I am looking at the season. I think the first three games will give us a good idea on what we have as a team this year. The first three games should be our easiest especially with Carson Palmer hurt. If we can win all three we should be able to win AT LEAST three or four more, which I would call a success for McDaniels. If we only win two I would predict a 4-5 win season max. If we only win one then I think we can only hope for a two or three win season. I think the worst thing for the Broncos is to win around 3-5 games. If we win less than three, I think the Mr. Bowlen will look for a new coach, if we win 5-7 games then Josh will be humbled a little bit and hopefully learn from his mistakes. If we win more than 8 games than I think we have a good coach and potential for the future. But if we only win 3-5 games I think Bowlen stays with McDaniels and we struggle through a couple rebuilding years until a change is finally made, a la Herm Edwards (who is forever rebuilding). So with that said I hope we win a lot of games but I just don’t want to finish in the gray area where we don’t know what kind of coach we have got.
Great Post
I had to read this twice. First time to hear where your dilemma was coming from, second time to see where I was coming from. I supported since that first Giants vs Broncos game back in the 90s where Elway threw an interception and got knocked upside the head as the defender scored. I remember people thinking how moronic and silly that play seemed because of the futile attempts of the QB after an interception. What I saw was a man trying to make a play after making an error. Stuck w/me forever.
Now after a few months I’ve been able to buy into the many changes and they’ve been tough changes no doubt. Personally, I think we’re better than given credit for but I understand MSM (mainstream media), I hated not knowing what that acronym meant at first, focus is to find something “newsworthy” and in conflict from its audience. I get that part and its part of making the business world go around, even its poorly researched or strictly opinionated.
I have to admit my disappointment as certain situations seemed to leave my team in shambles. All I kept thinking to myself was that “McDaniels had better been worth it”. From what I’ve seen in two preseason games, read about from the countless (sometimes thankless) posts on this here website, I am pleased w/the teams development but understand there is room for growth and improvement. So I may have moments where I’ll state “McDaniels better be worth it” but for the most part, I know my team is worth following and I am very pleased in the improved play of our defense and believe that if our offense needs some more time to improve as they acclimate and adhesive-ly grow together, I’m ok with that.
If 8-8 were to be a bad thing then so be it, I mean that’s been our stance since Cutler, Marshall and Shanahan’s revolving door on defense coordinator. I’ll take this year’s 8-8 over those three years of average effort, preparation and execution. At least this year’s team would only have the comfort knowing they were all learning new again. That in itself is an accomplishment.
Again, great post and rec’d!
Say hello to my fast...

by 


























