Shallow Thoughts & Nearsighted Observations
I'm really fired up for the 2009 season, and I hope every member of this community also is. I see a lot of reason to be positive, regardless of what people erroneously think of me and my proclivities for Kool-Aid. If I were a Raiders fan, I'd feel negative about the upcoming season, but I am a Broncos fan, so I do the other thing. Welcome to the new season, friends. Let's make it a great one. Ready.... BEGIN!!!
1. I attempt to have a certain week-to-week coherence and consistency between editions of this column. Regular readers know things about me, actually, even some really personal things, so to avoid being too "inside," I thought I should re-introduce myself in a couple of paragraphs, and let everybody know where I am coming from, and what they can expect from me, by choosing to read my content.
My name is Ted Bartlett, which you probably guessed. I grew up in Norwich, CT, and I presently live in Lakewood, OH, the first suburb west of Cleveland, along Lake Erie. I just turned 32, and I work as a Senior Financial Analyst for a Fortune 500 company. I've been a Broncos fan for more than 22 years, and I get a lot of grief about it, living in Cleveland. I always tell the people here that it hurts a lot worse to lose a Super Bowl than it does to lose an AFC Championship game, but they won't understand that until they've been through it.
I make no claims to being a journalist; I will actually explicitly state that I am nothing of the sort. I am a guy who watches a lot of football, and evaluates and describes what I see. I participated in a survey of sports bloggers a few months ago, with students of Penn State's Center for Sports Journalism, (the results are here, if you're interested,) and the guy asked me where I get my information. I didn't even think about it for a second, and I told him I get it from my eyes. I watch, I take notes, and I try to be coherent in the presentation of those observations.
What I don't do, and what I'll never do, is repeat what other people say, or steal their thoughts without attribution. I am known for being a little snarky, so if you think I might be saying something in a tongue-in-cheek way, I probably am. I meander some around pop culture, history, other sports, and whatever else seems germane in a given moment, but I always come back to football. My primary area of football expertise is offense, and I am proud to say that I have trained myself over the years to be able to watch football without watching the ball. I also always say, I am not in the arguing business, I am in the saying what I think business, so don't ever expect me to argue in the comments very much. I'm now (grudgingly) on Twitter @TedBartlett905, so if you like my work, follow me, and I might be encouraged to throw an ST&NO snippet up here and there during the week.
The key point is that I am a loyal Broncos fan, and I always will be, and my purpose in investing the many hours which I invest in this is to add value to the fan experience of every community member, and every Broncos fan. I hope you enjoy my work, and that of the many people who contribute to the site, and make MHR what it is.
2. Expect ST&NO to run at 8:30 AM on Tuesday mornings, going forward. During football season, it will definitely include thoughts about the Broncos, and their most recent game, since this is a Broncos blog. I have kind of settled into the niche of being the around-the-league guy of this site, and I will definitely also include thoughts about other games I watched, because I think knowing things about the whole league is a good thing. I am pretty sure I am the only guy who writes for a Broncos-centric outlet who focuses a lot on other teams and games, and I hope you find value in it.
A new weekly feature will include analysis of the line play (both offensive and defensive) in the Broncos game, as well as another selected game. I will watch the whole game, and focus on the lines, so you can learn interesting things like what terrible football players "Pro Bowlers" Flozell Adams and Matt Light are. This is an area which isn't being well-served by anybody, anywhere, so I am excited to bring it to you. I would call it "In The Trenches" but Firstfan writes a terrific feature by that name, before each game. I am working on a section title for it, but I don't have it yet. If you have any ideas, I'd love to see them.
3. On to current events. Isn't it great that we have current events to talk about again?
a. Big up our fearless leader, John Bena, and all of our terrific community reporters who have been able to visit training camp, and report back the real story, in an unfiltered way. Nobody is covering training camp better than MHR, and I will go on record as saying I'd like to take a shift next year (maybe a week?) I wonder if we can't cover the whole duration of camp with staggered visits and good planning.
b. I'm very happy to see Robert Ayers sign today, and if I have to choose, I'd rather have him in camp before Knowshon Moreno. I think Ayers is very well-suited for the OLB/DE position, particularly when it comes to setting the edge in the running game.
On that topic, I want to talk about that role, and how I envision them being used in the new defense. Their primary purpose will be to be physical, and maintain their gap assignments in the running game. I think Ayers, Darrell Reid, and Tim Crowder are very well-suited to that task, and Jarvis Moss and Elvis Dumervil, maybe not so much.
On passing downs, I would expect a guy like Ayers or Dumervil to line up with his hand on the ground as a 4th lineman, maybe with the other guy right outside him standing up. Jim Johnson passed this week, but his concepts of overload blitzing will surely live on. To me, it's the best way of generating a strong pass rush, if you've got defensive coaches who can identify and attack teams' tendencies with their protection schemes.
c. I'm very excited for the prospect of Peyton Hillis getting a lot of use this year. I wouldn't be surprised if he catches a lot of passes, as outstanding a receiver as he is, and as geared to high-percentage passing as the McDaniels offensive ethic has been. Don't be surprised to see Peyton carry the ball 80-100 times, catch 75-80 passes, and have 1,000 combined scrimmage yards, and 10-12 TDs. There's no reason he shouldn't be the best FB in the NFL, because he is the most talented.
d. I like everything I've heard about how the secondary looks. I've probably been the biggest cheerleader for the offseason acquisitions of Andre' Goodman and Alphonso Smith. The ever-illuminating Monday Morning QB column from Peter King filled us in on a nugget which surely hadn't occurred to anybody yet.
d. Assuming that Brian Dawkins, Champ Bailey, Renaldo Hill and Andre' Goodman make it to opening week without injury, Denver will have the oldest starting secondary of any team in this decade.
I'll be damned. They're pretty old. Of course, two of them are all-time greats who will be in the Hall of Fame someday, while Goodman is underrated and terrific, and Hill is underrated and very solid. The players who excite me more are Smith, Darcel McBath, David Bruton, Josh Barrett, and Jack Williams. Three rookies, and two second-year guys to go along with all the graybeards. It kinda sounds like what we call "succession-planning" in the Fortune 500 world. I must just be imagining that there could possibly be a plan - right, John Clayton?
e. I was watching a Patriots-Cardinals game not too long ago, on NFLN, from Week 16 of the 2008 season. For those who don't remember this game, the Patriots won 47-7. They ran the ball 42 times for 183 yards, and 2 TDs, and threw the ball only 38 times. The compelling thing is that they didn't do their running from any kind of spread-out look. They just ran it down the Cardinals' throats. It was a reminder of how flexible we can expect the Broncos to be on offense. They'll pound the ball against teams who struggle to stop the run, and they'll throw it against teams which struggle to stop the pass. Every week, the offensive game plan will be geared toward best attacking the weaknesses of the opposing defense. We're used to that from Mike Shanahan, but expect even more creativity from the McDaniels regime, if not all of the wisdom that comes from experience.
4. I really hate cliches. Every time a guy like Len Pasquarelli says that a pass rusher "gives tackles fits," I ask myself, "Really? Honest-to-goodness fits?" I don't even like it when sportswriters refer to a football game as a contest. It's a damn game, which has no particularly good synonyms, even if you have to be a little redundant and say the word "game" a lot. A limbo contest at a crappy bar is a "contest."
Here are a list of stupid football cliches that I hate:
a. Wildcat offense - A modern-era take on the Single Wing, there is nothing terribly fresh or creative about the so-called "Wildcat."
b. Red Zone - This is John Madden's fault. He shared on TV that some coach called the 20-to-Goal area the red zone, and now it's become a quasi-official term, if you listen to football commentators. It's always funny to hear an actual coach call it something other than that.
c. Spread offense - said as if it's standardized and universal like the veer series or something. The only real commonality is the the use of a lot of split receivers. Beyond that, there is WILD variation, way too much to consider everything that is called a spread offense to be part of one monolithic concept.
d. H-back - This isn't so much a cliche, as it is a misused term. Nowadays, the average John Clayton or Len Pasquarelli calls a lighter, more receiving-focused TE an H-back. Actually, when the Redskins invented the concept in the 80s, it was for one purpose: getting a strong blocker into the body of Lawrence Taylor immediately. The players they used as H-backs caught very few passes. Nobody uses this concept in 2009, so the widespread use of the term H-back is not correct.
e. Quarterback Of The Future - This is always used about a guy who wasn't a premium pick, and who may or may not be talented enough to start in the NFL, but the incumbent is considered replaceable by media members who would use this term. Think Kellen Clemens, when Chad Pennington was still the starter for the Jets. He was drafted to be the Quarterback of The Future, and his future seems to have somehow gone by the wayside.
f. Icing The Kicker - Really? Calling a timeout is going to make a difference whether a kicker makes it or not? I always thought it was interesting that Jason Elam said he preferred to have the time to focus on the task at hand. This concept is idiotic.
g. Circus catch - Does anybody go to circuses anymore? While we're at it, has anybody ever made a living catching poorly thrown footballs at them? That's a job I want.
h. Literally - As in, "The QB was literally run over by a freight train." No, he really wasn't. I think you meant figuratively, there, Bob Papa.
i. Intestinal fortitude - I think we have professional wrestling to blame for this. It's like when a commentator uses the word "patented" about the horse-collar tackle. Come on, guys. It's football, not the WWE.
i. Jamie Dukes - He's a walking cliche, and he just flat-out sucks. May God have mercy on his soul.
5. Living in Cleveland, I hear a lot about the Browns. I think they'll mess up if they don't choose Brady Quinn as their QB. He doesn't have the big arm of Derek Anderson, but he's better in every other way. The best thing about Quinn is how quickly and decisively he gets the ball out of his hands.
6. I guess I should weigh in on Michael Vick and Brett Favre, right? Vick shouldn't be suspended, but I don't expect him to resurface as a good every-down NFL QB. He never really was one, and 2 years in prison can't be good for your quick-twitch muscle memory.
As for Favre, I just hope the media lets this die. He left open the possibility of a Week 9 or 10 return, and we just don't need anymore of that.
7. Retired for John Elway.
8. I can't wait for the first preseason game. Having some actual football to evaluate will just make me so much happier. I'm fired up for this Broncos season, and I hope everybody else is too. Whether you're a Kool-Aid drinker or a more measured optimist, there's a lot of reason to feel good. I'll see you next Tuesday, with more ST&NO.
20 recs |
76 comments
|
Comments
Great to have ST&NO back!!
Great first post! I especially like the cliches segment. Maybe someday you could do a segment on stupid things football “experts” say, like “It’s a reverse!” – When really it’s just an end around… MHR has some of the best football analysts online and you’ve added much with your column. Thanks!!
by RobertDorband on Aug 4, 2009 6:59 AM MDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Glad to see you back TB!
Really glad I didn't include any player's names in my screen name with all the turnover we're seeing this offseason...
by ohiobronco on Aug 4, 2009 7:06 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Great post.
I always look forward to read your insights.
/The Hank, Stockholm
Mal...bad...in the latin.
by fripp21 on Aug 4, 2009 7:16 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Ted!
Thoroughly enjoyed that read. I can say now that I’m ready for my Tuesday to begin. With an arsenel of writers like you, Guru, broncobear, and styg, that grain of salt we should take with each MSM article just gets bigger and bigger.
Go Broncos…
by pshin8670 on Aug 4, 2009 7:17 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Ted, I'm also glad to see ST & NO back,
and ready to roll on the 09 season.
Go Broncos
rec’d
Real Power, comes with the realization that One cannot change the Moment;
only ones perception of it: Atitude! JQM
by UB3 on Aug 4, 2009 7:18 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
How about " Trench Warrors ",
Real Power, comes with the realization that One cannot change the Moment;
only ones perception of it: Atitude! JQM
by UB3 on Aug 4, 2009 8:48 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
woot! missed ya!
oh btw:
f. “You can’t shanahan Shanahan’s own kicker, the guy invented the late ice.”
by tunga77 on Aug 4, 2009 7:21 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm really excited too!
The position that intrigues me most is the DE/OLB, I think you are right about Ayers, Reid and Crowder being the run stuffers of their position.. I just can’t see Doom taking on guys like Marion Barber or Le’Ron McClain, but the other three should be able to rap them up.. Doom i think will be fine in Pass coverage as well, he is fast, smart and has long arms.
Thanks for the article.. :-)
by HorseStance on Aug 4, 2009 7:23 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
and you can add..
.. Brandon Jacobs and Clinton Portis to the list of physical runners we will be facing this season..
by HorseStance on Aug 4, 2009 7:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great to have ST&NO back!
Way to kick up my optimism again on a slow morning, Ted!
by BroncosBassist on Aug 4, 2009 7:34 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Hillis as All Pro "written all over him" (cliché). You could see his talent in the Miami game last season. Playing against a good defense that was also playing well at the time, Hillis had a monster game. He is the ideal 3rd and short back because he can smash it up the middle on a running play and he can catch out of the backfield and smash someone near the sideline, always moving forward. If used properly, he’ll be tough to game plan for in those critical situations.
If Moreno turns out to be a player, then Denver will have at RB what they already posses at OT and WR. The best young unit in the NFL.
Add “build a team from the inside out” to mindless clichés that need to go away.
Love the Broncos, don't like their Coach.
by McGeorge on Aug 4, 2009 7:43 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget the Thunder and Lightning cliche
That will arise if and when we have Hillis spelling Torain and Moreno.
Lady, you want me to answer you if this old airplane is safe to fly? Just how in the world do you think it got to be this old?
— Anon
Both optimists and pessimists contribute to the society. The optimist invents the aeroplane, the pessimist the parachute.
— George Bernard Shaw
by Choochoobonewagon on Aug 5, 2009 10:43 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I &%$@$# HATE THAT
Good one Choochoo :)
"I am not one of those who think that coming in second or third is winning." -- Robert F. Kennedy
by Ted Bartlett on Aug 5, 2009 11:14 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
ugh.
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Aug 5, 2009 11:16 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great read!
I literally laughed out loud while reading the cliches! I always get annoyed when the talking heads give their “keys to the game”…“Hmm so you are saying we need to stop the run, limit turnovers, create turnover, put pressure on the QB and control the line of scrimage in order for us to win the game?”…great insight!! It’s like why not just say we need to score more points..
by Vandylaxn21 on Aug 4, 2009 7:45 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Madden already used that last one!
"It's all over Fat Man" - Tom Jackson to John Madden 1977 AFC Championship Game
by DesertBroncoFan on Aug 4, 2009 8:54 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Nice article Ted...
one bone to pick though. The wildcat is nothing like the single wing. Blame that one on Madden as well. The Wildcat is a zone-read option offense developed by Rich Rodriguez when he was at WV. It is essentially a veer run from a shotgun spread formation. The single wing never used an option series. But it frustrates me as well the number of announcers who don’t know their history.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Aug 4, 2009 7:52 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
You're absolutely right from the perspective of the lack of an option series
My likening of the two concepts is due to the direct snap action to a Halfback, rather than a Quarterback. I agree with what you’re saying.
"I am not one of those who think that coming in second or third is winning." -- Robert F. Kennedy
by Ted Bartlett on Aug 4, 2009 9:13 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree Ted, and that's how I read it too.
The snap directly to a back is what you meant and that’s how I understood you. But I’ll go a level further. In the classic single wing, the player receiving the snap is considered the FB. He either hands to a HB or runs the ball himself (and rarely throws). He often blocks.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Aug 4, 2009 1:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes but
the single wing involves an unbalanced line with a particular arrangement of backs. That’s what distinguishes the Sw from the double wing or the Notre Dame Box, etc.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Aug 4, 2009 6:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
to the extend that it involves a direct snap to a back
it is similar to the single-wing. But there is so much more to the single-wing than just the direct snap. I doubt if any team, at any level, is really prepared to stop a true single-wing attack anymore.
Sorry i’m being a bit of a football geek here
by SlowWhiteGuy on Aug 4, 2009 6:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post, Ted. I am enjoying the comments. I played OC and OG in a Single Wing Offense in HS - 8 man football.
As center I would direct snap to the FB who was lined up with his left foot about 3-4 ft behind my right foot. I also would direct snap to the Tailback with his right foot lined about 5 ft behind my left foot. The Wingback was off to the left of the left end who was on the line. Both ends were on the line of scrimmage. With an unbalanced line, the inside guard would usually pull and lead the back on a running play. The old Single Wing was called “3 yards and a cloud of dust”.
by Blackknigh on Aug 5, 2009 12:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh but you forgot the Buck, the Buck-Lateral, the Triple Spin……
The SW is like a ballet in blood and mud.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Aug 5, 2009 11:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
the more I read up on RR
the more impressed I am…
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Aug 4, 2009 10:28 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought the wildcat came out of Arkansas
Wasn’t the old Arkansas Off Coord who went to Miami, who basically was option pass/running plays he’d designed for Darren McFadden? FootballOutsiders did a multi-part series breakdown on the “Wildcat.” There is 3 basic “wildcat” plays with variations… Its built around an unbalanced line, with a TE/H-back lined up behind the tackle. (in this case, H-back being the appropriate term for a player lined up in that position behind the line of scrimmage but tight to the formation.)
In that sense, many of the plays the announcers call “Wildcat” are no such thing, because they aren’t the 3 plays with the unbalanced line… they are basically just simple spread/option plays as practiced by a huge number of college teams (including WV, etc.).
by cjfarls on Aug 4, 2009 11:40 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
True to an extent....
but RR is the inventor of the spread-option attack.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Aug 4, 2009 6:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great as always
Glad to see you back in action, TB. I always learn more than a thing or two when reading your work. Every time.
by Douglas A. Lee on Aug 4, 2009 8:05 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Good to Read
Ted, I really enjoy reading your articles. Yes, I think you, and the rest of the MHRers are very optimistic about the Broncos post-Shanahan, but enthusiasm is OK… usually I am the unbridled optimist. (It’s actually kinda fun to play the role of grump or realist for a change.) I hope you guys are right and I am wrong to be so down on McDaniels, but no matter what, I am very happy that training camp has begun and the games will soon begin.
I think you have a lot of teaching blood in you and I am enjoying learning from you.
by Baltimore Bronco on Aug 4, 2009 8:14 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
There are some other terms or common thoughts which have been “proven” to be misleading / false but are found in almost every freaking football game:
by Todd Jewell on Aug 4, 2009 8:20 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Ted.
Always appreciate your work.
by NedBronco on Aug 4, 2009 8:21 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Great Read
Thank you Ted. I am looking forward to your analyses of line play. How about “On The Line” for a name? One nitpick: “Red Zone” has become an accepted term with many coaches if only because it is instantly recognizable when watching football broadcasts.
Thanks again for your great reporting from camp!
by Endzone on Aug 4, 2009 8:22 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
One more cliche
Deceptive Speed – you’re either fast, or you’re not.
by improv88 on Aug 4, 2009 8:26 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
And how long can you call something 'deceptive'?
I can see the game plan meeting now: “Coach, its week eight, and by golly, nobody has noticed that Jay Bob is pretty darn fast. Let’s build the plan around him again…”
There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance-- that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
-- Herbert Spencer
by PredominantlyOrange on Aug 4, 2009 8:45 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m guessing the people who said Terrell Davis (substitute any number of player’s names there) had “deceptive speed” or “ran well in pads” are the same ones who focused on his 40 time at the Combine and said he was “too slow” to be a quality NFL player. “Deceptive speed” is probably just code for “This guy is faster than I had criticized him for being, because I was either too lazy or didn’t have time to watch film. Now, because he’s proven otherwise his speed is deceptive. It’s not that I was wrong”
by Douglas A. Lee on Aug 4, 2009 9:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
Ted’s snarky is rubbing joyfully off on nyc today I see…..oh – literally!
Hillis/Moreno in '09
by Emmett Smith on Aug 4, 2009 10:03 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
Joe Sakic was pure class, win or lose, at all times.
by Colorado_Kitten on Aug 4, 2009 1:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
hehehe
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Aug 4, 2009 10:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think I first heard the term "deceptive speed"
as referred to Bobby Anderson, whom the Broncos made the mistake of drafting in the first round many years ago. (He wasn’t necessarily a “bust,” although I don’t think he ever played up to his #1 billing.) It’s just that the Broncos “homered” that pick, bypassing players who would have been a better fit.)
Anyway, I just thought the term meant the player really wasn’t very fast, because Bobby wasn’t. The next time the term was used, for a Bronco, anyway, was Steve Watson, IIRC, and he was fast . . . not a “burner,” but once he got past the secondary, it meant six points. So that left me not knowing what the hell it meant and actually hating the term.
I think the interpretations offered by PredominantlyOrange and NYC here are pretty appropriate . . .
Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy
by AZDynamics on Aug 4, 2009 10:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great to see you back Ted
I have a suggestion for your offensive/defensive line feature…
Entrenched: t place in a position of strength; establish firmly or solidly; to encroach; trespass; infringe; to dig trenches for defensive (offensive?) purposes
Thanks…rec’d
by BroncoSense72 on Aug 4, 2009 8:28 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I like this one!
My image is the Circa 1960-’61 Broncos home uniform sock. Some what folk lore to me ... but referred to as the clown sock by my Dad.
by YellowStoneBronco on Aug 4, 2009 9:06 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
Maybe expand it with part of bchipers’ as well…
Entrenched – Between the Lines
by BroncoSense72 on Aug 4, 2009 9:27 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
All you get from drafting the "best player available" is a team full of good football players.
by orangeblood on Aug 4, 2009 1:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the excellent read!
I think you are spot on about Hillis. Even though we have a plethora of backs (I believe we will sign Moreno soon), I see him as a SUPER sized Dallas Clark. What a gift we have in him. :)
A proud prognostication of 10-6 in 2009!!!
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
John Adams
by Broncotodd on Aug 4, 2009 8:45 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
rec'd for a fun an dinformative read, thanks TB
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by BShrout on Aug 4, 2009 8:49 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
As always Ted a great read
How about “See between the lines” or something to that affect.
by bchiper on Aug 4, 2009 8:54 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Ted
"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra
"No, I'm from Iowa, I only work in outer space."
by KaptainKirk on Aug 4, 2009 9:17 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Great job Ted!
Couldn’t agree more about “icing the kicker”. My biggest beef is it wastes my time. ;-)
by ShawnDenver on Aug 4, 2009 9:17 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
You mean Jamie Dukes is a moron?!
But I thought that everything said on MSM was absolute truth!

VS.

by Orange_Crush on Aug 4, 2009 9:24 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Literally
Ted, you should check out
http://listen.grooveshark.com/#/song/Misuse_of_Literally/22296283
by David Cross, a comedian. Discusses the use of Literally, very funny stuff! But bad language, so not for work!
by 3RingsHeProbablyKnowsSomething on Aug 4, 2009 9:41 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Good to see you back, Ted . . .
You might not claim to be a journalist, but you definitely are a writer. I love the way you spice your perspicacious insight with a light sprinkling of satire. MHR is lucky to have you. Keep it coming . . .
Never argue with a fool, lest you take on his appearance. - my daddy
by AZDynamics on Aug 4, 2009 10:24 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Peter King
what did he say about Alphonso Smith in his Monday Morning QB column? I couldn’t find it.
by prototype on Aug 4, 2009 10:36 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank you Ted Bartlett
I am so pleased to have found this forum. That is one credit I give to The Denver Post blogs. The other is for the submittals of JeffG (being nearly the only material – articles and posts included – worthwhile on that site). I don’t know why you can’t find this kind of information anywhere else. You would think the editors of the DP would be alerted to what is going on here and would realize what kind of writers/writings they are short on.
The cliche segment was terrific and right on (the former because of the latter no doubt).
As for a suggestion for your section title, perhaps you could use “Ted Draws The Line” or a derivative thereof.
by warmick on Aug 4, 2009 10:36 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Great read! Definitely Rec'd
I like “Through the Lines” or “Inside the Lines”
Or warmick’s idea – or a lead from that ‘Drawing the Lines’….
Whatever you call them, they’ll be most appreciated! As are the ST&NO regardless of who writes them. Love the cliche peeves!
= )
First team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! and then some, right? I think four and we oughtta let someone else have a fair shot : )
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Aug 4, 2009 10:52 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
awesome as always Ted
good to see you back!
I don’t expect him to resurface as a good every-down NFL QB. He never really was one, and 2 years in prison can’t be good for your quick-twitch muscle memory.
errm…then again, it just might! ;)
How about “Ted’s Trench Analysis” for your feature? I always like straight up title’s (though I am guilty of both obtuse acronyms and “insider” titling), especially when labelling serious(ly good) analysis. By the time one of our photoshop wizards gets done with the header, something simple and clear might be the best possible lead-in…. but that is the editor in me talking.
The fan says “Across the Lines” or “Around the Lines” or “Through the Trenches”. Maybe “Hard Line Truths”. You could stick witht he titling theme of ST&NO and call it “The Worst Damn Line Analysis Ever”, or “Nothing to See Here: More Boring Line Analysis”. Maybe “ST&NO: Now with MORE Boring Line Analysis”
“It All Starts Here: Ted Bartlett’s Week Whatever Line Analysis, featuring the Bears Oline” Last I checked there was no word limit on titles :).
“Eyes off the Ball: NFL Line Analysis”
“Linewatch” (you could feature an introductory montage that featured the linemen running and playing on the turf, maybe a few shots of their combine 40’s, in gloriously jiggling slo-mo….)
“Know Your Trench Warfare”
“A New Line of Scrimmage”
And so many more….
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Aug 4, 2009 11:02 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
"The LOS: A Closer Look"
yay, an acronym!
There is no army so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
by Jeremy Bolander on Aug 4, 2009 11:03 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay Styg
Nice tangent there. Step away from the keyboard and mouse. You need to go get a nice cool drink of water. :)
I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.
by sadaraine on Aug 4, 2009 11:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOS
I’ve spent too many hours working on a technical report about Line-of-Sight Intercept Trials, so LOS means something completely different for me…
Or maybe it just means I need more FOOTBALL to retrain my brain. :-)
Joe Sakic was pure class, win or lose, at all times.
by Colorado_Kitten on Aug 4, 2009 1:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good stuff, Ted!
Although I think Jamie Dukes looks pretty good … when you put him up against Solomon [a misnomer if ever there was one] Wilcotts.
At least John Madden made his cliches more interesting by interspercing the occasional “Bam!” in there, and it was obvious that, while he took the game seriously, he never took himself all that seriously.
My least favorite chiche comes in the terms of “warfare” and/or “soldier.” I will guarantee you that nobody who’s been in Afghanistan or Iraq has called what they’re doing a “game” or a “contest.” Kellen Winslow should be peermanantly embarrassed.
How about “Scr-Images” as a title for your line work?
by 42n81 on Aug 4, 2009 12:20 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, Ted!
Good to see your post again. I look forward to the season and your take on it. Maybe… “Over D Line”. Groannn!
" Life is what happens while you're making other plans "
by hairybear on Aug 4, 2009 12:26 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Amen to Literally
There really isn’t anything that annoys me more than people using literally incorrectly. It drives me nuts. The most recent example that comes to mind is Woody saying that McD and Orton were litterally linked at the hip. Does that mean we’ll only be able to put 10 guys on the field when we’re playing offense?
Horton is win.
by jack_ on Aug 4, 2009 12:40 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
As a teacher...
…two of my pet peeves were “literally” and “hopefuly”. You discussed “literally” (and I told students to watch the news, where newscasters use the term constantly and wrongly).
Hopefully: “Hopefuly we’ll go to the park later” doesn’t mean that we hope we’re going to the park later. It means we are going to the park later full of hope. Hopefuly means “full of hope”, not “it is to be hoped that…”
Just sayin’.
: )
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe
by Steve Nichols on Aug 4, 2009 1:41 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I "literally" loved this post Ted.
Wasn’t it Coach Bill Walsh who invented the H back to counter LT?
by bfree2bronc on Aug 4, 2009 1:45 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Nope
Walsh wasn’t coaching the Redskins. He used a pulling left guard to counter LT. The pulling motion gave the guard a little more time and a slightly beter angle to deal with LT’s incredible strength and quickness. It worked – mostly.
Hillis/Moreno in '09
by Emmett Smith on Aug 4, 2009 2:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Joe Gibbs was the coach
Younger fans remember him as having lost a step, but in the 80s and 90s, there was nobody better
"I am not one of those who think that coming in second or third is winning." -- Robert F. Kennedy
by Ted Bartlett on Aug 4, 2009 2:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
And he implemented the H-back
before LT’s rookie year. Unless he was very prescient, it is doubtful that he did it to counter a player who hadn’t played a down yet.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Aug 4, 2009 6:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was a little kid then, so I don't have personal recollection but...
Gibbs is quoted here talking about how the genesis of the idea was blocking Lawrence Taylor. I’m sure that quote is where I got the idea that that’s where it came from, but I acknowledge that I wasn’t watching football in those days.
"I am not one of those who think that coming in second or third is winning." -- Robert F. Kennedy
by Ted Bartlett on Aug 4, 2009 8:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't doubt that Gibbs remembers it that way...
but he was experimenting with the concept while he was still an assistant under Coryell. It does make a good story though.
by SlowWhiteGuy on Aug 4, 2009 11:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
re: I would call it "In The Trenches"
hmmmmm
as a fan of the genius that was Bob Marley i’m going to have to suggest
“Trenchtown Rock”
even though Mr. Marley was a fan of a different sort of futbol.
Hit Me With Music !
by Jenna Talia on Aug 4, 2009 1:47 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Language is fluid
Like the adage, if you repeat something often enough and for long enough, it becomes true….such is with language, and ‘literally’ has been misused for literally centuries. :-)
Joe Sakic was pure class, win or lose, at all times.
by Colorado_Kitten on Aug 4, 2009 1:56 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
It's nice to show some precision in words.
They can sure get you in trouble if you’re not careful. I really like your attack on cliches which annoy me during broadcasts.
Imagination is more important than knowledge A. Einstein
by Ponderosa on Aug 4, 2009 3:32 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Red Zone
You know what? I actually like the term. It makes things very clear for us; it’s a much shorter version than saying “inside the opponent’s 20 yard line” or “defending inside your own 20 yard line.” I think some Red Zone stats are interesting and useful, and it would be somewhat clumsy to say “Kyle Orton’s QB rating inside his opponent’s 20 yard line is such and such.” “Kyle Orton’s red-zone QB rating” is just neater.
by Douglas A. Lee on Aug 5, 2009 8:32 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Another excellent post Ted. Thanks
The accuracy of your statements was observed by me during the first four days of camp. This is another outstanding article Ted. I have just accepted a new assignment which will limit my time to write about the offensive and defensive lines for the coming week so feel free to use In The Trenches. I will look forward to it each week with enthusiasm.
It all starts in the trenches - HT 11/11/08
Leave the hateful vitriol to the uninformed - HT 3/16/09
by firstfan on Aug 5, 2009 11:17 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 































