Broncos release four as roster cutdowns begin

by John Bena on Sep 1, 2009 11:57 AM MDT in Roster Moves Comment 100 comments

Teams across the NFL has to pare their rosters from 80 to 75 players as the League prepares for the start of the 2009 Regular Season in 9 days. For the Broncos, that meant saying adios to 4 players, since Brandon Marshall is on the Reserved-Suspended list (currently, anyway).

As such, the team released P Britton Colquitt, WR C.J. Jones, TE Jeb Putzier and C Blake Schlueter.

Schlueter was a 7th-round pick in this past April's draft, and Colquitt seemed to be making a late run at Brett Kern's starting job, with two beautiful punts inside the 5-yard line Sunday Night. Too little, too late, I suppose.

The Broncos now sit at 75 players for Thursday's preseason finale against Arizona. Teams have to be at 53 players by Saturday, 9/5.

1 recs | Comment 100 comments | Share

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Surprised by Colquitt

But it is probably better for him to be able to find another team.

by adamriggs on Sep 1, 2009 11:59 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs

Same on Colquitt

What a waste on Schlueter

by Bustafluff on Sep 1, 2009 12:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Expect that they sign him and Schlueter to the practice squad.

by Broncos_BZ on Sep 1, 2009 12:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Colquitt won't make the PS, probably

Someone needs a punter, and he’s pretty damned good.

by BroncosBassist on Sep 1, 2009 1:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

agree

He deserves to start for somebody.

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 1, 2009 1:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I looked up their numbers

P Brett Kern is third in the league in gross punting average (47.5 yds.). Rookie P Britton Colquitt, a college free agent from the University of Tennessee, leads all NFL rookies in net punting average (40.3 yds.). That sort of explains the situation. I agree with those who say that Colquitt should get another shot – he’s going to catch on with someone.

Hillis/Moreno in '09

by Emmett Smith on Sep 1, 2009 2:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

with our luck this year

he’ll come back to haunt us. ; )

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 1, 2009 2:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Yep, he's gonna get picked up -

no doubt. Just like last year when Kern beat out Paulescu.

by Merlin Scott on Sep 1, 2009 2:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Colquitt

Priefer, Burns and McD must have a lot of confidence in Kern. Especially when Priefer coached his brother in KC.

by Endzone on Sep 1, 2009 12:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Yah but Kern

did also look very good, and has more experience. I think it was probably a tough call, and Colquitt will be snapped up right quick by another team. But even as good as Colquitt was it’s not like Kern wasn’t also good. My only surprise is just that BC showed that he had versatility by backing up Prater a few times. But maybe he wasn’t really that special in that regard. Best of luck to him.

The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".

by underdog on Sep 1, 2009 1:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Very surprised on Colquitt as well.

Denver Stiffs.com: Defending the sovereignty of Nuggets Nation.

by Nate Timmons on Sep 1, 2009 1:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I knew Putzier would not make the final 53, but im surprised he’s with the first round of cuts already.

Colquit really surprises me… had expected it would be him to be the new punter, he looks solid and can kick off as well. Im sure he’ll be claimed be a team very soon.

Bleeding Orange & Blue in The Netherlands

by BroncosNL on Sep 1, 2009 12:01 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

Not really for me

Cutting him now gives him a better chance of landing on another roster, but I figured he would be cut since I could not see them keeping four TE’s and you figure the three were already set. The only way Putzier was going to make this team is if someone got injured.

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman

by Broncoman on Sep 1, 2009 12:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Putzier

I’m not surprised here. Quinn has demonstrated good ability and potential.

by Endzone on Sep 1, 2009 12:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Sorry to see Putz go

but not surprising.

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 1, 2009 1:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Poor Jeb, but he knew the score going in...

they were only going to keep 3 TEs. Maybe a TE needy team will pick him up (Cinci).

Quinn looked good and this only cements his place on the final roster.

by DBronx777 on Sep 1, 2009 1:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Says a lot of good about Quinn

Nice call on that today, Ted

Hillis/Moreno in '09

by Emmett Smith on Sep 1, 2009 12:06 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

Schlueter to the practice squad?

So are they hoping Schlueter makes it to the practice squad?

by FtCoNative on Sep 1, 2009 12:08 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

I doubt it, getting cut this early means he will likely be trying to sign somewhere else

Usally they wait until the last cuts and then try to sign the guy right away rather than have him floating out there for a week.

by Broncoman on Sep 1, 2009 12:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

he still may be out there for pick-up later

fader nation is a conquered nation

Jerry Jones is Al Davis with a smile!

by mdierk on Sep 1, 2009 12:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Maybe, but general history has shown that team aren't likely to sign a guy to their practice squad

if they cut him a week before the final cuts, usally they try to hide those guys until the end and then sign them before other team nab them.

by Broncoman on Sep 1, 2009 12:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Schlueter

A bit of a surprise here since he was a draft pick. But picking up Hochstein probably made him expendable.

by Endzone on Sep 1, 2009 12:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Surprised that they let Schueter go this soon

I would of figured they would of waited for the last cut day and thn try to get him on the practice squad

by Broncoman on Sep 1, 2009 12:08 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

that would be my thought as well

but this pretty much guarantees that he is not in the forefront of their practice squad considerations. There is a good and bad to this…

the bad is that Schlueter was a decent prospect. The good is twofold: it means that they are taking the wiser road of preparing to hold onto at least one extra veteran on the line (hochstein), and it means that they aren’t sold on the idea of making up for sunk costs (i.e., they drafted Schlueter so they HAVE to make him workout). If cutting him makes the team better, then cut him…

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 1, 2009 12:44 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs

other knocks

He’s a Center and only a Center. His weight dropped from a 290ish, optimistic number down to below 280. Hochstein’s versatility and Schlueter’s youth. Youth on the OL — both in general and for us this year — aint such a good thing.

We seem to need a little size + experience in the interior, so we can run block a little more effectively.

I don’t like what I’ve seen there so far. And Kuper’s injury makes us even ‘thinner.’

"If people define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas

by Colinski on Sep 1, 2009 4:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Liechtensteiger

Hasn’t looked bad. Hasn’t looked great either. Kuper’s injury has me very worried. I was already noticing issues on the strongside G blocking.

by Endzone on Sep 1, 2009 4:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Well as for the two punters

they both had similar punt averages, and both downed 2 inside the 20….with Kern having the longest punt of 59 yards….tho that punt may have come on the long bounce/roll.

Both seem to be interchangeable to me….with Colquitt having the past character issues may have been a factor in making him the odd man out. It shouldnt be too hard for Colquitt to find a job somewhere.

Kern was also named to the all-rookie team..or something like that… last year as the punter.

On To Victory!!!

by alacumba!! on Sep 1, 2009 12:10 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

may have helped Kern

that he has experience holding kicks, and that Prater is comfortable with him

On To Victory!!!

by alacumba!! on Sep 1, 2009 12:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

True, I was actually surprised that they brought Colquitt in to begin with

I thought Kern did a very good job last season, I rather that they had brought in another PK to challenge Prater.

by Broncoman on Sep 1, 2009 12:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I agree.

I was kind of expecting that they would have brought in another place kicker just to pressure Prater. I thought Kern was pretty good last year. Why bring in Colquitt at all? Then again, why did we replace our Long Snapper (tounge in cheek)?

Strength and honor

"It's easy to have faith in yourself and have discipline when you're a winner, when you're number one. What you've got to have is faith and discipline when you're not yet a winner." -Vince lombarti

by kybroncomaniac on Sep 1, 2009 12:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I suspected

that it was a typo on a memo somewhere.

McDaniels: Take a letter to X. Love Kern but let’s bring in some competition for Prater.

Secretary (writing but distracted by something shiny): Bring in some competition for Kern. Got it.

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 1, 2009 1:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I agree alacumba

They could have gone either way as far as I could see. There must have been a very minor intangible that was considered to make this decision.

"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra
"No, I'm from Iowa, I only work in outer space."

by KaptainKirk on Sep 1, 2009 12:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

And so it begins

No major surprise…totally agree with having a PK in camp…but it didn’t happen. Cost me a Gents bet ’cause I said no way he would be in Orange & Blue for ’09. Jeb is a journeyman and I think Schlueter will be a serviceable back-up but probably no higher…

When will the O’Connel deal get done?

by MHFan4Life on Sep 1, 2009 12:27 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

4 pm est is when they award claimed players each day...

So I guess we’ll know one way or another in about 1 hr and 20 minutes…

by PredominantlyOrange on Sep 1, 2009 12:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Too bad KC will get him first

Im sure if NE cut their waterboy Pioli at KC would have him picked up immediately. While I would be interested to see O’Connel in a Broncos uniform…I just dont see it with the way KC has been picking up waiver players and their superior position.

On To Victory!!!

by alacumba!! on Sep 1, 2009 12:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Don't the Chiefs already

have 4 QBs (including Cassel) or did they cut someone I’m not aware of?

The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".

by underdog on Sep 1, 2009 1:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I hope we get Kevin O'Connel...

it is rare to have a QB be able to come in and run the offense right away. That would certainly be a good thing for our that position given all the recent injuries. McD appearently worked him out when he was at New England and they used a 3rd round pick on him. I’m keeping my fingers crossed.

by DBronx777 on Sep 1, 2009 1:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

McD said that they'd be OK starting TB

I was very surprised, but I’m happy to hear it. He’s got a couple of weeks and another game to get used to driving the machine – he’s got a long way to go, but he’s a very fine young player.

Hillis/Moreno in '09

by Emmett Smith on Sep 1, 2009 2:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Me Too

not a knock on Simms or Orton but the kid is kinda exciting.

Tis better not to throw it to the deep receiver but the open receiver.

by Kfustud on Sep 1, 2009 2:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Lions Claimed O'Connell

A bit surprised by that.

Keep Moving Forward.

by ColoradoOwl on Sep 1, 2009 2:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I was right on CJ Jones… but had Branson instead of Putzier and Lich instead of Schleuter. I thought they would wait longer to get rid of one of the punters

by Todd Jewell on Sep 1, 2009 12:30 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

You bring up a good point...

it is interesting that they kept M. Branson. Maybe he has a shot at the practice squad.

by DBronx777 on Sep 1, 2009 1:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Blake and Britton are PS eligible

watch and see if they get put there!

http://www.davusx.net/assets/db/la_la_land.gif

"We should have kept Seattle and dumped San Diego from the Division"

Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!

by Jon Tollerud on Sep 1, 2009 12:35 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

C.J. Jones

No surprise here. He was not performing well. Other WR’s were doing better than he was.

So, making a guess, I think we’ll keep these guys:
*Royal
*Stokley
*Gaffney
*Marshall
*Lloyd

Between Swift and Jackson…hmmm…

by Endzone on Sep 1, 2009 12:37 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

what about McKinley?

Bleeding Orange & Blue in The Netherlands

by BroncosNL on Sep 1, 2009 12:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

oops, yes

I had him as my #5, but I don’t know what Endzone had.

I wanted to correct my comment below since I was going off memory and forgot about McKinley.

Here’s my roster at WR:

WR – (6) Marshall, Royal, Stokley, Gaffney, McKinley, Lloyd – (7) Jackson

Note: 6 was my guess at how many would be kept and I listed the 7th, Jackson, because I thought we might keep 7.

I’ve revised my thinking regarding Jackson lately. It’s going to be interesting. I’d like to see a 7th WR but I don’t know if the injury situation allows it.

"If people define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas

by Colinski on Sep 1, 2009 1:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Guessing

I’ll bet we keep 7 WR’s and Marshall is suspended another couple of weeks.

by Endzone on Sep 1, 2009 1:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

that makes the numbers interesting

Suspended players don’t count against the 53 (I believe) so we could temporarily carry an added player. Marshall didn’t count against the initial 53 last year either.

The margins of the roster are often in flux, so the question is whether some players will perform an important job, such as KR, which allows them to remain on the 45 man active squad, or if they’ll be a Mustard-like, we have you on the rolodex type of temporary worker.

It’s not a trivial consideration to know that they can be brought back. And PS members need to stay there for a while lest we burn part of their eligibility for the PS. I foresee a hard five at WR with a possible temporary worker existence for the 6th and even 7th. It’s really about how many RBs we can function with. WR is a less wear-and-tear position so we can get by with fewer players, if needed.

"If people define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas

by Colinski on Sep 1, 2009 1:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Makes Sense To Me

I would not be surprised if we pick up a RB cut by another team to add temporary depth.

by Endzone on Sep 1, 2009 1:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

McKinley

I like McKinley at #6 because I have Lloyd at #5 because of his experience.

by Endzone on Sep 1, 2009 1:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Ooops

Yeah, sorry! He did really well the last game. He’s showing good improvement.

by Endzone on Sep 1, 2009 1:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Yes, that's what I predicted

The #5, #6 & #7 — Lloyd, Jackson & Swift — are what are interesting. Jackson has shown me something lately, and I noticed that a sports writer had listed as one of a hand full of players who’ve fared better under the new coaching staff.

The question may be overall numbers, since injuries may make it necessary to keep more depth at positions where injuries have affected the depth situation. We can get by with one less WR but some other positions may not be able to function. RB has that walking wounded look already — again.

"If people define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas

by Colinski on Sep 1, 2009 12:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

The rap on both Lloyd and Jackson

is that they have historically been very inconsistent players. So it will be interesting who makes the cut.

by bchiper on Sep 1, 2009 1:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

yeah

its gonna be

Royal
Marshall
Gaffney
Stokley
McKinley

between C.Jax, and Lloyd…i say swift has no chance.

"He who is not courageous enough to take risks will accomplish nothing in life". -Muhammad Ali
Celtics-17 rings, 18 on the way
Im drowning in all this Kool-aid

by BDAWKisaBRONC on Sep 1, 2009 12:53 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

he may not make the 53 man squad but....

His chances of making the PS are very good. He does all the little things, such as block, and he’s good over the middle, which helps him, especially considering Marshall’s current status.

I wouldn’t dismiss Swift’s eventual odds of sticking around. He’s up against a lot of good WRs right now, which makes it hard for him. Our #6 & #7 — Lloyd and Jackson (actual order is arguable) — are as good as last year’s #4 — Darrell Jackson.

"If people define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas

by Colinski on Sep 1, 2009 1:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Since I am a Boise State fan as well, I am sad to see Putzier go and fear it could be the end of the line for the former Bronco.But being fourth on the tight end depth chart certainly didnt help his chances.

After watching Colquit in 2 preseason games,I was convinced that he would at least make it to the final cut.I hope that McD made the right call in the punter battle

by OrangeCrush4082 on Sep 1, 2009 1:25 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

Re: Schlueter

It’s been apparent for some time that the numbers weren’t going to work out in his favor. The trade for Hochstein eliminated whatever tiny possibility left that he could make the 53 man protected squad.

Schlueter’s stellar pro day, especially his very fast (for an OL) 40, boosted his stock, but he saw little time and the real story was his weight.

I watched his listed weight (and the weight numbers do appear accurate despite skepticism) and he couldn’t hold enough mass on his already thin frame (for an OL).

His last listed weight: 279.

There is a need for bigger Centers now, because 3-4 teams use giant NTs to control the middle.

"If people define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas

by Colinski on Sep 1, 2009 1:34 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

i believe marshall will be dealt, even if the value is low

by lolcopter on Sep 1, 2009 1:42 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

Any value is high value for that imbecile at this point. Though I doubt the Broncos would settle on a 5th rounder or worse.

by ELGee on Sep 1, 2009 1:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I doubt it. I think the lowest we’ll go is a second-rounder plus some later picks. I doubt he gets traded.

We need to let him sit for as long as he wants to.

by aLuffabo on Sep 1, 2009 2:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Marshall trade rumor.

You can read more about it in the Fanshots, but the rumor is Marshall to Arizona, Boldin to K.C. and Leinart to Denver.

But who will guard the guards themselves?

by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Sep 1, 2009 6:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

ewwww gross

by trumanj on Sep 1, 2009 6:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

And the rumor comes from where

exactly?

And why would we want to help KC for that matter?

The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".

by underdog on Sep 1, 2009 7:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Ugh...

Colquitt has pedigree.. this was Mac’s first Shanahan-esque move. Sticking with the familiar face who has some friends in the locker room despite being not even half as talented.

Let’s face it, folks.. we’re going to punt a LOT this year, and special teams play is crucial when you have a green defense philosophy-wise. Kern’s boomers out of the end zone at home and 30 yard ducks on the road aren’t what we need.

As for Schleuter.. seemed like a decent guy, but 7th round picks are 7th round picks for a reason. I agree that he’ll probably be on the PS.

by ELGee on Sep 1, 2009 1:56 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

Kern was #5 in the NFL at punting in 2008

It’s not like either was stinking it up. It’s odd to have 2 quality punters competing.

"If people define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas

by Colinski on Sep 1, 2009 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

In Net Yardage?

by ELGee on Sep 1, 2009 2:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I've checked

Kern’s net yards average was 46.7, which put him at 8th in the NFL, although some averages should be omitted because they’re not representative. Cassel, yes him, had a sole punt to put him at #1. Two others had low total punts, which can skew their average. McBriar (Dal) and Pakulak (NO) had 24 punts a piece.

The reason we weren’t considered a strong punting team is because our allowed average on returns stunk. Note: the other statistic called Net Average includes the return so I’m making a confusing distinction. I’m trying to distinguish what the punter does well from what the STs do not (in our case, last year).

"If people define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas

by Colinski on Sep 1, 2009 2:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

True.

But, sometimes the return can be attributed to a poor punt (low, short hang-time not allowing the gunners to get downfield).

Now, I’m not pining for Colquitt. I think they both performed admirably, and one of them had to go. Too bad punters don’t have any trade value. :)

by BroncosBassist on Sep 1, 2009 2:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

hang time

The numbers for hang time for Kern are good. It’s not a knock on Colquitt however.

Our average for PR allowed is the statistic that tells us — in part — how well we covered. It’s not a number that’s easy to find, unfortunately.

I’ve seen numbers here at MHR that suggest we did quite poorly. Kern performed admirably but the coverage let us down, for the most part. We’ve focused on that area and seem to have improved however.

"If people define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas

by Colinski on Sep 1, 2009 3:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

He was 17th in Net.

by ELGee on Sep 1, 2009 2:05 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

He was also tied for 27th with a measly 13 kicks Inside the 20. One could say part of the blame falls on special teams tackling, but good punters find a way to stick the ball on the sidelines. If it does get returned, there’s nowhere for the returner to go. Kern kicks straight down the middle of the field far too often.

But, as with all questionable moves, I digress.. we could still have Ernster or Paulescu shudder

by ELGee on Sep 1, 2009 2:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

He also has the huge advantage of being

an experience holder whom Prater is comfortable working with.

Notice you never saw Britton holding. That was a big disadvantage for him, plus we don’t have a viable replacement holder on the roster. I don’t remember ever seeing Simms hold and I’m not sure about Brandstater.

In addition, his accuracy (outside of the Hester kick) has improved this preseason.

"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden

by Randall15 on Sep 1, 2009 2:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Sims is a south-paw

I think that makes a difference, holding for a right-footed kicker. Gotta catch with your off hand…

Of course, I’ve never played a down as a kicker or holder, so I could be making that all up wholesale. :)

by BroncosBassist on Sep 1, 2009 2:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Colquitt has great potential

I liked his ability to put “kill” balls (i.e., make them stop) inside the 20, and that’s why I was on the fence regarding punter lately.

Use the NFL site and order rankings by hitting the Avg, etc. at the top of the list, which will re-rank according to whatever you’re selecting. NET Avg is different from Average Net — oddly.

Avg net punting

Kern’s net avg was 46.7 whereas his Avg Net was 37.8. It’s about STs coverage, and since Kern’s hang time is good I wouldn’t blame him.

"If people define situations as real, they are real in their consequences". W. I. Thomas

by Colinski on Sep 1, 2009 2:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

would the roster size + suspended players be the reason marshall isn’t on the depth chart?

by Todd Jewell on Sep 1, 2009 2:24 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

Knowshon update from MHR

MileHighReport twitter: Knowshon Moreno returns to practice. A welcome sight for a team looking for something positive to happen…

The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".

by underdog on Sep 1, 2009 2:28 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

Good News

for sure!

by Merlin Scott on Sep 1, 2009 2:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Do you guys think Marcus Thomas is going to make the final 53?

Love the Broncos, don't like their Coach.

by McGeorge on Sep 1, 2009 2:39 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

I’ve never liked the guy, and haven’t seen a single thing so far in the preseason to tell me he would make the roster. I also hope Clemons is gone too along with Moss, then we can forget about the last 4’ish years of defensive drafting debacles.

by aLuffabo on Sep 1, 2009 2:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I tend to agree. I’d definitely cut Crowder and Moss. Clemons too.

Not sure about Thomas, but I don’t think any of those four will make the final roster.

Love the Broncos, don't like their Coach.

by McGeorge on Sep 1, 2009 2:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Who do you see as DE?

Right now, we’ve got McBean, Peterson, Smith, Thomas, Clemons, and Askew (that I remember). If we cut Clemons and Thomas, that leaves us with Askew as second string (unless Pedescleaux makes a leap). That doesn’t look too great, to me. I think of the guys behind the first three, Thomas is the best.

by BroncosBassist on Sep 1, 2009 3:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

When you put it like that, yikes! Something is wrong when a guy of those physical gifts continues to show nothing. He’s the kind of physically gifted/low football IQ player whose absence in the 2009 draft class delighted me. If Shanahan hadn’t traded up to get him, the fan base’s hopes would have been a lot more reasonable….

Who survives the LB cuts is the more interesting question to me.

by Chibronx on Sep 1, 2009 3:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Good question

I will bet that one or more of Thomas, Moss, Crowder, and Clemons is gone.

Keep Moving Forward.

by ColoradoOwl on Sep 1, 2009 2:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I don't think so

McDaniels seems pretty clear about building a productive and versatile team with size on the defensive side. I don’t know about you, but I’m not seeing much productivity from Thomas.

I don’t want breakaway speed. I want break-some-poor-fool-as-I-bowl-you-over power getting 6 yards off a play that should have been stopped for 2 at most.

by sadaraine on Sep 1, 2009 3:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Injury

Marcus Thomas was looking good until he hurt his shoulder.

by Endzone on Sep 1, 2009 3:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

hard to be productive when you're injured.

Hasn’t he missed most of pre-season? I thought he was looking pretty decent ’til he got hurt.

Btw according to the DP he was back at practice today, too. Hopefully that gives him enough time to show what he has, or doesn’t have…

The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".

by underdog on Sep 1, 2009 4:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Marcus Thomas definitely makes the team...

I think they keep 6 D Lineman – McBean, Fields, Peterson, Smith, Thomas, and Baker

by DBronx777 on Sep 1, 2009 3:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Also remember that M. Thomas didn't play versus the Bears

He was hurt much of last week. During review of the previous two preseason games I thought Marcus looked pretty good.

by DBronx777 on Sep 1, 2009 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

What about Carlton Powell?

A lot of people were excited about his potential as a run-stopper here, what changed?

by aLuffabo on Sep 1, 2009 4:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I Was Excited

He spent all of last year on injured reserve. I was excited for him to perform well this year. Unfortunately, to my eye, he has not. Instead he has looked fat, slow and indecisive. I’m disappointed.

by Endzone on Sep 1, 2009 4:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

I was optimisic about Powell as well

however he didn’t seem to catch on at camp and has not got much playing time. Maybe he is a practice squad player. It depends how much upside the coaches think he has.

by DBronx777 on Sep 1, 2009 4:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Who was the guy who punted to Hester?

and who did the sideline kick v the bears?

free 10 cents to bet with , completely ad-supported, no personal info check it out
http://www.centsports.com/?opcode=547710
Tom Brandstater -nstater +y =Tom Brady 13-3 baby

by RiG on Sep 1, 2009 4:38 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

It wasn't the kick

The kick was not bad. It was, imo, two things. One – McBath overpursued Hester and Two – Bruton, the gunner, was held all the way down the field. Maybe three – STers did not adequately cover their zones of responsibility.

by Endzone on Sep 1, 2009 4:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

Its not that Im blaming the kickecker but the plan to boot it so deep

We should get more hangtime and be there when they catch it. imo

Hester had like 15 yards in front of him to much room for any returner

free 10 cents to bet with , completely ad-supported, no personal info check it out
http://www.centsports.com/?opcode=547710
Tom Brandstater -nstater +y =Tom Brady 13-3 baby

by RiG on Sep 1, 2009 5:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs