Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Four TCU Football Players Among 17 Arrested In Drug Ring

"We're going to play everybody here. There will be a certain rotation we're going to have, depending on the way the game is going. We have a plan going in how to play each guy, and the same thing with the receiver group. We're going to play those guys 'X' number of plays and get them in there, and we're going to keep certain guys in for certain plays."

over 2 years ago Milehighreport_tiny John Bena 35 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I don't know how I feel about that

How is the offense supposed to find a rhythm when the players keep substituting in and out?

by Bustafluff on Sep 15, 2009 1:49 PM MDT reply actions  

I'm with you

There has to be a balancing act with this sort of approach. On the one hand you need guys to get in a rhythm, on the other hand you want to keep them fresh for 4 quarters, 16 games. I can see this helping if/when injuries occur, you have someone who’s already been in the fire stepping in.

This is what we wanted...
Hey, look what we got!

by pubkeeper on Sep 15, 2009 1:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

How about, on the other hand

it just might keep opposing defenses off balanced too. The days of the running back carrying the ball 30 or more times is coming to an end. Sure there may be times when a player runs a few plays in a row but not all day.

by bfree2bronc on Sep 15, 2009 2:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

Plus

I would imagine that if everyone is routinely getting snaps, that would have the net effect of keeping everyone sharp and on their game, reducing the amount of time needed to establish a rhythm.

There’s that theme again: short term challenges for long term dividends.

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 15, 2009 3:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

Well Somehow

The Giants can do it. So can the Panthers. Tennessee can do it. Anyway this is the way it will go.

Tis better not to throw it to the deep receiver but the open receiver.

by Kfustud on Sep 15, 2009 2:33 PM MDT up reply actions  

agreed, bustafluff, but for what it's worth...

a couple lines later in the same piece:

In response to a follow-up question, McCoy said the team is willing to be a bit flexible on it plan at tailback if a hot hand clearly emerges during the game.

still though, i like systems that have a feature back, a bulldozer for short yardage, and maybe a speedy scat guy and that’s about it. i just don’t think having four or five “situational backs” every game lets anyone get in the groove.

by oxmouth on Sep 15, 2009 2:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

I agree

I think you need to have a primary back and secondary back, trying to play four backs is basically asking for inconsistency, part of the line ability to block is they get used to how backs will react, where to take the block, how fast they hit the hole and how quick they can attack the second level. For the running game to be effective, they need to know who the main guys are and not have 4 or 5 guys through the game.

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman

by Broncoman on Sep 15, 2009 9:59 PM MDT up reply actions  

Total agreement

I usually tow the team line, but I don’t like what I’ve seen with the running game at all— both in terms of the player rotation and the incoherent (IMO) scheme in general.

by PredominantlyOrange on Sep 15, 2009 2:07 PM MDT reply actions  

I understand the basic philosophy

and it is important to keep players fresh, as well as preparing them for the week by dividing reps. However sometimes you have a player that is playing extremely well in a game and you need to continue to play the “hot hand.”

On a side note – GIVE HILLIS THE BALL!!! He makes plays and we need to give him to opportunity to produce.

I hope we see a lot better out of Knowshon this week. Buck looked good.

by DBronx777 on Sep 15, 2009 2:08 PM MDT reply actions  

This will change as the season goes on

First, I don’t think we should expect to see much of Hillis as RB until Larsen returns to the lineup. They won’t want to risk injuring our only remaining FB by overusing him as RB. Second, I think it’s obvious that Moreno is not 100 percent yet. When he is, he’ll start getting the ball more and more, and essentially become our primary back.

By the second half of the season, barring injury, I suspect that Moreno will be getting 75 percent of the carries, and Hillis/Buck 25 percent.

by Telluridden on Sep 15, 2009 4:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

it's better than having 7 RBs on the IR

let it ride

i like hillis, but the worship of him in broncos country is a bit ridiculous. he doesn’t need 20 touches every game just because people like him

by lolcopter on Sep 15, 2009 2:23 PM MDT reply actions  

It's

not the RBs I’m real concerned about, it’s the wide receivers…

by Bustafluff on Sep 15, 2009 2:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

good point. i think marshall was being subbed frequently to ease him back into the offense. he looked rusty

the QB and WRs need to get their timing down, so i agree that the “starters” should get the most reps at WR

by lolcopter on Sep 15, 2009 2:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sooo.....how is this different than other positions?

Just seems to me that this is sorta like treating runners the same way maybe other players are used…like…dont coaches sometimes have totally detailed plans for how they are gonna use receivers and tight ends and defensive linemen and defensive backs and stuff. And…if the coaches have the same kind of ideas about running backs…then how is it different.

Maybe you can find the kind of running backs you want. Like…if you have a choice between a guy who can go in sorta totally cold when its his turn or his situation and he is in for one or two plays and then is out and can do it…thats the kinda guy you want at running back. But…….if you have a bunch of guys who needs lots and lots of carries to get warmed up so then they can be good…maybe i want the guys who can go in and do it on totally short notice.

And what do i know…well…not much. Just sayin’

MHR...and proud of it!

by MHRsGirl on Sep 15, 2009 2:36 PM MDT reply actions  

it’s not any different. the broncos have been doing this for years, which is why it’s always a bad idea to draft a broncos RB in fantasy football!

this goes all the way back to mike anderson and tatum bell

by lolcopter on Sep 15, 2009 2:49 PM MDT up reply actions  

Exactly

Running back by committee is definitely the trend in the NFL these days. Maybe if Moreno turns out to be the next incarnation of Terrell Davis, McC will change his tune. Until then, I say go with the hot player from game to game.

by DCbroncfan on Sep 15, 2009 2:54 PM MDT up reply actions  

good point

but i guess what bothers me about rotating three to five backs is how do you ever know who the hot player is? the guy who just got 8 yards, i guess….??

by oxmouth on Sep 15, 2009 3:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think it’s different though for WRs. We know many teams use RBs by committee… but WRs by committee?

by Bustafluff on Sep 15, 2009 3:17 PM MDT up reply actions  

How about sitting the cold player?

I think Moreno could have sat more…he definitely wasn’t the one with the hot hand or feet.

by NDbronco on Sep 15, 2009 3:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

My biggest concern....,

Isn’t the RB rotation. It is the o-line. We seem to be running much more in the way of power run plays and getting away
from the zone stuff. The o-line hasn’t consistently opened up holes for the RBs, and you can’t blame them. Much of the o-line is too undersized to expect them to consistently drive bigger d-linemen off the line of scrimage. We really should stick with the zone stuff more of the time

by OrangeandBlue27 on Sep 15, 2009 3:17 PM MDT via mobile reply actions  

quoting Dr. Bartlett, regarding the Bengals game
Among 20 running plays, I counted 11 zone-blocked plays and 9 man-blocked plays. Buckhalter had good success both ways, and LaMont Jordan had a nice run on a zone play. Peyton Hillis had his only carry behind man-blocking, which I think suits him best, and Knowshon Moreno ran both ways, having more success in man-blocking, which didn’t have him running sideways, which was largely his downfall in his underwhelming debut.

It’s about even, and it appears some players may be more adept at one than the other. Key word is “versatility”. Imagine, in the classic Shanahan switch-up style, the O line going man, man, man, ZONE. D lines gotta hate that.

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 15, 2009 3:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

The o-line hasn’t consistently opened up holes for the RBs, and you can’t blame them.

who can we blame? chicago’s wide receivers?

by lolcopter on Sep 15, 2009 3:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

i think

he was just suggesting that our O line consists of players better suited (size-wise) to zone, as has been our tradition under Shanahan.

It’s a fair point, but I do believe we’ve been getting a little more size there in recent years, as well as some of the FAs we’ve picked up, correct?

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 15, 2009 4:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

yeah, i understand that point, but your response already addressed it so i was trying to be a smart ass

by lolcopter on Sep 15, 2009 4:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

lol okay gotcha

And no worries — others try, you succeed. ; )

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 15, 2009 4:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

OK but

Then why spend a 12th pick in the draft on a guy you are planning on occasionally playing? Similar to the Patriots drafting Laurence Maroney, why draft high a guy you don’t plan on using extensively?

by AKfan on Sep 15, 2009 3:56 PM MDT reply actions  

hot hand

I think his comment about the hot hand further down in the thread is revealing. If Know comes alive, he’s gonna be the guy. That’s probably as much the coaches’ hope as it is ours. He clearly has a ways to go to adjust to NFL speed, though.

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 15, 2009 4:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

Agree with you BM....

Versatility is the key with the group, and take the earlier points about getting bigger in recent years and blending more power running into our game. However, the running game looked decidedly different to me on Sunday than in recent years. Maybe I missed them, but I don’t recall many zone stretch plays. Even Mcdaniels has admitted the group, and I would imagine he’s refering to Hamilton and Wegman in particular, are smaller players than he is used to in his offense. All I am suggesting is that we play to our strengths, which I propose are more quickness than power.

by OrangeandBlue27 on Sep 15, 2009 5:49 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'm with you

I miss those nice big holes we used to blow in defenses. ^^

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 15, 2009 10:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

because other than hillis, all of our RBs are seasoned vets with injured pasts

by lolcopter on Sep 15, 2009 4:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

excellent point

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 15, 2009 4:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Haleycriesalot_small
Pre-Free Agency Thoughts
Pumpkin_small
MLBs - what we have and what Fox and Del Rio historically want
Ph_small
2011: MHR I Need Your Help With An Upcoming Post
Zozobra_small
Explaining What "IT" Is that Tebow Has: An Analysis of the Art of Miracles
Pumpkin_small
The risk/reward analysis on drafting RBs earlier vs later

Recent FanPosts

Small
Broncos Roster needs – offseason 2012
Cube-orange_small
what makes a good nickel cornerback?
Small
Spread-ing History
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
The First Real Signing
La_la_land_small
Kids In A Candy Store
Small
A Shot at a Mock
Small
Broncos positions of need – off season 2012
0_1979_ford_f100-sequin_small
My GM box 2.0
Pimp_hand_-_the_pimp_hand_is_strong_in_this_one_small
Questions about the Spread Offense
Small
CHEAP SKATES

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

Dadndaughter_small Tim Lynch

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Position Coach

Flag_canada_small Colby

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall

Small zsheely

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk