Captain's Patch
Did anyone else notice that none of the captains had on the "C" patch this last weekend?? i could be wrong but im pretty sure they didnt have them on. Any reason for this??
jjjjjjjjj jjjjj jjjjjj jjjjj jjjjjjjj jjjjjjjj jjj jjjjjjjjjjjjjj jjjj jjjjjjjjjj
jjjjjjjjj jjjjj jjjjjj jjjjj jjjjjjjj jjjjjjjj jjj jjjjjjjjjjjjjj jjjj jjjjjjjjjj
jjjjjjjjj jjjjj jjjjjj jjjjj jjjjjjjj jjjjjjjj jjj jjjjjjjjjjjjjj jjjj jjjjjjjjjj
jjjjjjjjj jjjjj jjjjjj jjjjj jjjjjjjj jjjjjjjj jjj jjjjjjjjjjjjjj jjjj jjjjjjjjjj
jjjjjjjjj jjjjj jjjjjj jjjjj jjjjjjjj jjjjjjjj jjj jjjjjjjjjjjjjj jjjj jjjjjjjjjj
jjjjjjjjj jjjjj jjjjjj jjjjj jjjjjjjj jjjjjjjj jjj jjjjjjjjjjjjjj jjjj jjjjjjjjjj
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
0 recs |
10 comments
Comments
i have been wondering the same thing!
i thought it was a new requirement from the nfl
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win"-Brandon Marshall
GET TO CAMP BRANDON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by broncoboy on Sep 15, 2009 8:09 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
50th anniversary patch
Everyone is wearing those, so no captains patch’s. Not all teams wear them though, the Ravens haven’t worn the captains patch any of the years that they have been available.
by Vandylaxn21 on Sep 15, 2009 8:41 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I disagree. I’ve seen the patches.You can only have two patches max on a jersey I thought. So do you guys have two patches this year? One for the AFL and one for the Broncos anniversary?
by SpecialBrownie on Sep 15, 2009 9:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
We use to wear the patches
I don’t know the league rule on how many you can wear, but we wore the captain C patches the previous two years. But none of the captains were wearing them on Sunday. It must be a team choice becuase like I said, their has been teams who have elected not to wear the patch on their jersey, like the Baltimore Ravens. The broncos must have chosen just to go with the 50th anniversary patch and nothing else.
by Vandylaxn21 on Sep 16, 2009 12:44 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well. I checked the rule and it’s two patches maximum. And you guys already have the Broncos anniversary patch and the AFC anniversary patch. So I think thats why.
by SpecialBrownie on Sep 16, 2009 4:44 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the research
Victor Frankl:
What man actually needs is not a tensionless state but rather the striving and struggling for some goal worthy of him. What he needs is not the discharge of tension at any cost, but the call of a potential meaning waiting to be fulfilled by him.
Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms – to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.
by wyoeng on Sep 16, 2009 12:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the team can choose
to wear the patch or not. Not every team does it. I personally like not wearing the patch. No undue attention to individuals, after all this is the ultimately team sport.
by 5280FT on Sep 16, 2009 8:20 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I was Looking
Has NE ever worn the patch? I didn’t find a picture of Brady with one. Frankly I think the patches are ugly.
Tis better not to throw it to the deep receiver but the open receiver.
by Kfustud on Sep 16, 2009 9:32 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Patches?
We don’t need no Stinking Patches!
"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra
"We don't stop playing because we grow old; We grow old because we stop playing." -- George Bernard Shaw
Breaking jaws or the NFL in Oakland who cares? Fall on your pirate’s sword - Ponderosa
by KaptainKirk on Sep 16, 2009 9:40 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't have said it better Kaptain
+1
by bchiper on Sep 16, 2009 1:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




























